Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Heart logoLink to Heart
. 1997 Apr;77(4):357–362. doi: 10.1136/hrt.77.4.357

Impact of continuous quality improvement on selection of pacing mode and rate of complications in permanent pacing.

J E Møller 1, E H Simonsen 1, M Møller 1
PMCID: PMC484732  PMID: 9155617

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To improve pacing mode selection and to reduce complications of pacing using continuous quality improvement. DESIGN: Criterion standard study. Comparison of implantations from 1992-94 with preset standards. Implementation of corrections in 1994 and re-evaluation in 1995, with one year follow up of all patients. SETTING: Tertiary hospital. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients implanted with a pacemaker from January 1992 to October 1993, 361 patients; October 1993 to June 1994, 115 patients; and January 1995 to October 1995, 140 patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reasons for not choosing physiological pacing and complications of pacemaker implantation. RESULTS: Most frequent reasons for not selecting physiological pacing for patients in sinus node disease were age (12.8%, 5 of 39) and technical problems (12.8%, 5 of 39); and for patients in atrioventricular block, age (31.4%, 16 of 51), and disability due to other diseases (13.7%, 7 of 51). To improve the standards, age as a sole reason for not selecting physiological pacing was disregarded and VDD pacing was introduced. Follow up showed fulfillment of standards. Cost analysis indicated minimally increased expenses of pacing hardware and no additional costs of procedures. A high rate of complications (16.2%, 77 of 476) was found related to atrial lead displacement (10.2%, 19 of 186), and to subclavian puncture from January 92-June 94. To reduce complications use of atrial screw-in leads and cephalic cut down were encouraged. Follow up showed significant reduction of complications from January 92-June 94 (77 of 476) compared with January 95-October 95 (12 of 140) (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Better compliance with international pacing guidelines was obtained by registration of reasons for deviations followed by corrections of procedures. By using screw-in leads and by using cephalic cut down the set standards were met.

Full text

PDF
357

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aggarwal R. K., Connelly D. T., Ray S. G., Ball J., Charles R. G. Early complications of permanent pacemaker implantation: no difference between dual and single chamber systems. Br Heart J. 1995 Jun;73(6):571–575. doi: 10.1136/hrt.73.6.571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersen H. R., Thuesen L., Bagger J. P., Vesterlund T., Thomsen P. E. Prospective randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet. 1994 Dec 3;344(8936):1523–1528. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90347-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bernstein A. D., Parsonnet V. Survey of cardiac pacing in the United States in 1989. Am J Cardiol. 1992 Feb 1;69(4):331–338. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90229-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chauhan A., Grace A. A., Newell S. A., Stone D. L., Shapiro L. M., Schofield P. M., Petch M. C. Early complications after dual chamber versus single chamber pacemaker implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994 Nov;17(11 Pt 2):2012–2015. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb03791.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Furman S. Venous cutdown for pacemaker implantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1986 Apr;41(4):438–439. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)62705-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Linde-Edelstam C., Gullberg B., Norlander R., Pehrsson S. K., Rosenqvist M., Rydén L. Longevity in patients with high degree atrioventricular block paced in the atrial synchronous or the fixed rate ventricular inhibited mode. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992 Mar;15(3):304–313. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1992.tb06500.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Markewitz A., Wenke K., Weinhold C. Reliability of atrial screw-in leads. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1988 Nov;11(11 Pt 2):1777–1783. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1988.tb06309.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mounsey J. P., Ray S. G., Griffith M. J., Gold R. G., Bexton R. S. Impact of internal audit on pacemaker prescription and the immediate costs of pacing in the northern region: towards implementation of the recommendations of the British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group. Br Heart J. 1994 Apr;71(4):395–398. doi: 10.1136/hrt.71.4.395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mueller X., Sadeghi H., Kappenberger L. Complications after single versus dual chamber pacemaker implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990 Jun;13(6):711–714. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1990.tb02095.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nathan A. W., Davies D. W. Is VVI pacing outmoded? Br Heart J. 1992 Apr;67(4):285–288. doi: 10.1136/hrt.67.4.285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Parsonnet V., Bernstein A. D., Lindsay B. Pacemaker-implantation complication rates: an analysis of some contributing factors. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989 Mar 15;13(4):917–921. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(89)90236-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ray S. G., Griffith M. J., Jamieson S., Bexton R. S., Gold R. G. Impact of the recommendations of the British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group on pacemaker prescription and on the immediate costs of pacing in the Northern Region. Br Heart J. 1992 Nov;68(5):531–534. doi: 10.1136/hrt.68.11.531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rosenqvist M., Brandt J., Schüller H. Long-term pacing in sinus node disease: effects of stimulation mode on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Am Heart J. 1988 Jul;116(1 Pt 1):16–22. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(88)90244-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sulke N., Dritsas A., Bostock J., Wells A., Morris R., Sowton E. "Subclinical" pacemaker syndrome: a randomised study of symptom free patients with ventricular demand (VVI) pacemakers upgraded to dual chamber devices. Br Heart J. 1992 Jan;67(1):57–64. doi: 10.1136/hrt.67.1.57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sutton R., Bourgeois I. Cost benefit analysis of single and dual chamber pacing for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block. An economic sensitivity analysis of the literature. Eur Heart J. 1996 Apr;17(4):574–582. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a014911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. de Belder M. A., Linker N. J., Jones S., Camm A. J., Ward D. E. Cost implications of the British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group's recommendations for pacing. BMJ. 1992 Oct 10;305(6858):861–865. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6858.861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heart are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES