Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Heart logoLink to Heart
. 1997 May;77(5):417–422. doi: 10.1136/hrt.77.5.417

Signal averaged P wave compared with standard electrocardiography or echocardiography for prediction of atrial fibrillation after coronary bypass grafting.

P J Stafford 1, S Kolvekar 1, J Cooper 1, J Fothergill 1, F Schlindwein 1, D P deBono 1, T J Spyt 1, C J Garratt 1
PMCID: PMC484762  PMID: 9196410

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To define the clinical value of the signal averaged P wave (SAPW) and to compare it with the standard electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiogram, and clinical assessment for the prediction of atrial fibrillation after coronary bypass grafting (CABG). DESIGN: Prospective validation cohort study. SETTING: Regional cardiothoracic centre. PATIENTS: 201 unselected patients undergoing first elective CABG were recruited over six months. Patients requiring concomitant valve surgery were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Age, sex, cardiothoracic ratio, and cardioactive drugs were noted. P wave specific SAPW recordings, ECG, and M mode echocardiograms from which left atrial diameter was measured were performed within 24 hours of surgery. Filtered P wave duration (SAPWD), spatial velocity, and energy were calculated from the SAPW. From the ECG, lead II P wave duration, P terminal force in lead V1, total P wave duration, and isoelectric interval were measured. Patients had Holter monitoring for 48 hours postoperatively and daily ECGs until discharge. RESULTS: Two patients died (1%) and 10 were unsuitable for analysis (5%). Of the remaining 189, 51 (27%) had atrial fibrillation (AF) lasting > 1 hour at a mean of 2 (0.5 to 7) days after CABG. Of the variables examined, only SAPWD (AF group 148 (SD 12), v 142 (14) ms, P = 0.008) and male sex (AF group 96%, v 78%, P < 0.01) were significantly different. A prospectively defined SAPWD of > 141 ms predicted atrial fibrillation with positive and negative predictive accuracies of 34% and 83%. Logistic regression analysis identified both male sex and SAPWD as significant independent predictors of postoperative atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS: Signal averaged P wave duration was a better predictor of atrial fibrillation after coronary bypass grafting than standard electrocardiographic or echocardiographic criteria. The predictive value of this test is such that it is likely to be useful in the design of prospective trials of prophylactic antiarrhythmic treatment but is of limited use using current techniques in the clinical management of individual patients.

Full text

PDF
417

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Buxton A. E., Josephson M. E. The role of P wave duration as a predictor of postoperative atrial arrhythmias. Chest. 1981 Jul;80(1):68–73. doi: 10.1378/chest.80.1.68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Christiansen E. H., Frost L., Pilegaard H., Toftegaard-Nielsen T., Pedersen A. K. Within- and between-patient variation of the signal-averaged P wave in coronary artery disease. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996 Jan;19(1):72–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb04793.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Frost L., Lund B., Pilegaard H., Christiansen E. H. Re-evaluation of the role of P-wave duration and morphology as predictors of atrial fibrillation and flutter after coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur Heart J. 1996 Jul;17(7):1065–1071. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a015003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Frost L., Mølgaard H., Christiansen E. H., Hjortholm K., Paulsen P. K., Thomsen P. E. Atrial fibrillation and flutter after coronary artery bypass surgery: epidemiology, risk factors and preventive trials. Int J Cardiol. 1992 Sep;36(3):253–261. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(92)90293-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fuller J. A., Adams G. G., Buxton B. Atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Is it a disorder of the elderly? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989 Jun;97(6):821–825. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Guidera S. A., Steinberg J. S. The signal-averaged P wave duration: a rapid and noninvasive marker of risk of atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Jun;21(7):1645–1651. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90381-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Klein M., Evans S. J., Blumberg S., Cataldo L., Bodenheimer M. M. Use of P-wave-triggered, P-wave signal-averaged electrocardiogram to predict atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. Am Heart J. 1995 May;129(5):895–901. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(95)90109-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Leitch J. W., Thomson D., Baird D. K., Harris P. J. The importance of age as a predictor of atrial fibrillation and flutter after coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990 Sep;100(3):338–342. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. MORRIS J. J., Jr, ESTES E. H., Jr, WHALEN R. E., THOMPSON H. K., Jr, MCINTOSH H. D. P-WAVE ANALYSIS IN VALVULAR HEART DISEASE. Circulation. 1964 Feb;29:242–252. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.29.2.242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Opolski G., Stanisławska J., Słomka K., Kraska T. Value of the atrial signal-averaged electrocardiogram in identifying patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 1991 Mar;30(3):315–319. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(91)90009-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Seifert M., Josephson M. E. P-wave signal averaging. High tech or an expensive alternative to the standard ECG? Circulation. 1993 Dec;88(6):2980–2982. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.88.6.2980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Stafford P. J., Cooper J., Fothergill J., Schlindwein F., deBono D. P., Garratt C. J. Reproducibility of the signal averaged P wave: time and frequency domain analysis. Heart. 1997 May;77(5):412–416. doi: 10.1136/hrt.77.5.412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Stafford P. J., Robinson D., Vincent R. Optimal analysis of the signal averaged P wave in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Br Heart J. 1995 Oct;74(4):413–418. doi: 10.1136/hrt.74.4.413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Stafford P., Denbigh P., Vincent R. Frequency analysis of the P wave: comparative techniques. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995 Feb;18(2):261–270. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb02516.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Steinberg J. S., Zelenkofske S., Wong S. C., Gelernt M., Sciacca R., Menchavez E. Value of the P-wave signal-averaged ECG for predicting atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Circulation. 1993 Dec;88(6):2618–2622. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.88.6.2618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Yamada T., Fukunami M., Ohmori M., Kumagai K., Sakai A., Kondoh N., Minamino T., Hoki N. Characteristics of frequency content of atrial signal-averaged electrocardiograms during sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Mar 1;19(3):559–563. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(10)80273-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Yousif H., Davies G., Oakley C. M. Peri-operative supraventricular arrhythmias in coronary bypass surgery. Int J Cardiol. 1990 Mar;26(3):313–318. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(90)90087-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heart are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES