Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of the waiting time for elective percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) on the primary success rate. SETTING: University hospital in The Netherlands. PATIENTS: A cohort of 817 consecutive patients awaiting elective PTCA. Scheduled PTCA was performed in all 817 patients, involving 1237 coronary lesions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The relation between procedural success and the duration of the waiting time was evaluated. Major cardiac events, that is, death and myocardial infarction while awaiting PTCA, were documented. Alterations in lesion characteristics during the waiting time were assessed in unsuccessful procedures. RESULTS: Elective PTCA was performed within one to six weeks after acceptance in 388 patients (587 lesions; 47.5%), between six and 12 weeks in 203 patients (308 lesions; 25%), and after more than 12 weeks in 226 patients (342 lesions; 27.5%). The procedural success rates in the defined time intervals were 97%, 99%, and 97% in ACC/AHA type A lesions, 93%, 87% and 90% in type B lesions, and 63%, 55% and 38% in type C lesions respectively; 96% of type C lesions were total coronary occlusions. There was a significant decrease in primary success rate in type C lesions after a waiting time beyond 12 weeks. A reasonable explanation for an unsuccessful angioplasty related to alterations in lesion characteristics during the waiting time was documented in only four of 115 procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The primary success in type A and B lesions is unaffected by the duration of a waiting period for elective PTCA. A waiting time of more than 12 weeks is associated with a lower success rate in patients with total coronary occlusions.
Full text
PDF




Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bell M. R., Berger P. B., Bresnahan J. F., Reeder G. S., Bailey K. R., Holmes D. R., Jr Initial and long-term outcome of 354 patients after coronary balloon angioplasty of total coronary artery occlusions. Circulation. 1992 Mar;85(3):1003–1011. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.85.3.1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Braunwald E. Unstable angina. A classification. Circulation. 1989 Aug;80(2):410–414. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.80.2.410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carroll R. J., Horn S. D., Soderfeldt B., James B. C., Malmberg L. International comparison of waiting times for selected cardiovascular procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Mar 1;25(3):557–563. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00442-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chester M., Chen L., Kaski J. C. Identification of patients at high risk for adverse coronary events while awaiting routine coronary angioplasty. Br Heart J. 1995 Mar;73(3):216–222. doi: 10.1136/hrt.73.3.216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Collins-Nakai R. L., Huysmans H. A., Scully H. E. 23rd Bethesda conference: access to cardiovascular care. Task Force 5: Access to cardiovascular care: an international comparison. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Jun;19(7):1477–1485. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90607-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ellis S. G., Vandormael M. G., Cowley M. J., DiSciascio G., Deligonul U., Topol E. J., Bulle T. M. Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group. Circulation. 1990 Oct;82(4):1193–1202. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.82.4.1193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ivanhoe R. J., Weintraub W. S., Douglas J. S., Jr, Lembo N. J., Furman M., Gershony G., Cohen C. L., King S. B., 3rd Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of chronic total occlusions. Primary success, restenosis, and long-term clinical follow-up. Circulation. 1992 Jan;85(1):106–115. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.85.1.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maiello L., Colombo A., Gianrossi R., Mutinelli M. R., Bouzon R., Thomas J., Finci L. Coronary angioplasty of chronic occlusions: factors predictive of procedural success. Am Heart J. 1992 Sep;124(3):581–584. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(92)90262-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marber M., MacRae C., Joy M. Delay to invasive investigation and revascularisation for coronary heart disease in south west Thames region: a two tier system? BMJ. 1991 May 18;302(6786):1189–1191. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6786.1189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Myler R. K., Shaw R. E., Stertzer S. H., Hecht H. S., Ryan C., Rosenblum J., Cumberland D. C., Murphy M. C., Hansell H. N., Hidalgo B. Lesion morphology and coronary angioplasty: current experience and analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Jun;19(7):1641–1652. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90631-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Naylor C. D., Baigrie R. S., Goldman B. S., Basinski A. Assessment of priority for coronary revascularisation procedures. Revascularisation Panel and Consensus Methods Group. Lancet. 1990 May 5;335(8697):1070–1073. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)92640-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Naylor C. D., Baigrie R. S., Goldman B. S., Cairns J. A., Beanlands D. S., Berman N., Borts D., Fitchett D. H., Haq A., Hess A. Assigning priority to patients requiring coronary revascularization: consensus principles from a panel of cardiologists and cardiac surgeons. Can J Cardiol. 1991 Jun;7(5):207–213. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Naylor C. D., Sykora K., Jaglal S. B., Jefferson S. Waiting for coronary artery bypass surgery: population-based study of 8517 consecutive patients in Ontario, Canada. The Steering Committee of the Adult Cardiac Care Network of Ontario. Lancet. 1995 Dec 16;346(8990):1605–1609. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91934-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Puma J. A., Sketch M. H., Jr, Tcheng J. E., Harrington R. A., Phillips H. R., Stack R. S., Califf R. M. Percutaneous revascularization of chronic coronary occlusions: an overview. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Jul;26(1):1–11. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00156-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rentrop K. P., Feit F., Sherman W., Thornton J. C. Serial angiographic assessment of coronary artery obstruction and collateral flow in acute myocardial infarction. Report from the second Mount Sinai-New York University Reperfusion Trial. Circulation. 1989 Nov;80(5):1166–1175. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.80.5.1166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ryan T. J. International comparisons of waiting times for cardiovascular procedures: a commentary on the long queue. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Mar 1;25(3):564–566. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00545-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stone G. W., Rutherford B. D., McConahay D. R., Johnson W. L., Jr, Giorgi L. V., Ligon R. W., Hartzler G. O. Procedural outcome of angioplasty for total coronary artery occlusion: an analysis of 971 lesions in 905 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Mar 15;15(4):849–856. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90285-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sullivan P. The AMA looks north with fear and loathing. CMAJ. 1990 Jan 1;142(1):50–51. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suttorp M. J., Kingma J. H., Vos J., Koomen E. M., Tijssen J. G., Vermeulen F. E., Ascoop C. A., Ernst J. M. Determinants for early mortality in patients awaiting coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a case-control study. Eur Heart J. 1992 Feb;13(2):238–242. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tan K. H., Sulke N., Taub N. A., Watts E., Karani S., Sowton E. Determinants of success of coronary angioplasty in patients with a chronic total occlusion: a multiple logistic regression model to improve selection of patients. Br Heart J. 1993 Aug;70(2):126–131. doi: 10.1136/hrt.70.2.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Warren R. J., Black A. J., Valentine P. A., Manolas E. G., Hunt D. Coronary angioplasty for chronic total occlusion reduces the need for subsequent coronary bypass surgery. Am Heart J. 1990 Aug;120(2):270–274. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(90)90069-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weissman J. S., Stern R., Fielding S. L., Epstein A. M. Delayed access to health care: risk factors, reasons, and consequences. Ann Intern Med. 1991 Feb 15;114(4):325–331. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-114-4-325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

