Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2016 Apr 27;11(4):e0154421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154421

Lamivudine Concentration in Hair and Prediction of Virologic Failure and Drug Resistance among HIV Patients Receiving Free ART in China

Jing Yan 1,#, Jia Liu 2,#, Bin Su 3,#, Xiaohong Pan 4,#, Zhe Wang 2, Jianjun Wu 3, Jiafeng Zhang 4, Yuhua Ruan 1, Jenny Hsi 1, Lingjie Liao 1, Yiming Shao 1, Hui Xing 1,*
Editor: Shibo Jiang5
PMCID: PMC4847920  PMID: 27119346

Abstract

Background

The assessment of adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) is important in order to predict treatment outcomes. Lamivudine (3TC) is one of the most widely used NRTIs in China, but its concentrations in hair and association with virologic failure and drug resistance have not been studied.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional survey to investigate 3TC concentrations in hair as a predictor of virologic failure and drug resistance among HIV patients receiving free ART. We also compared the capacity of hair 3TC concentrations with self-reported adherence in predicting virologic responses. Hair 3TC concentrations were detected through the LC-MS/MS system.

Results

In patients without HIV drug resistance (HIVDR), with a threshold hair 3TC concentration of 260 ng/g, the sensitivity and specificity in predicting virologic suppression were 76.9% and 89.9%, respectively. Some factors, including CD4+ cell counts, initial treatment regimens with 3TC, and current regimens with second-line drugs, influenced the association between hair 3TC concentrations and virologic suppression. In patients who experienced virologic failure with HIVDR, with a threshold of 180 ng/g, the sensitivity and specificity were 70.0% and 74.4%, respectively. Hair 3TC concentrations had higher sensitivity and specificity in predicting virologic failure and drug resistance than self-reported adherence.

Conclusions

The hair 3TC concentration was a stronger indicator than self-reported adherence in predicting virologic failure and drug resistance in HIV patients receiving free ART.

Introduction

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) effectively reduces HIV patients’ morbidity and effectively prolongs their disease-free lives. According to a previous study, antiretroviral treatment outcomes are relevant to immunologic, pharmacokinetic factors, and adherence to regimens [1]. Strict adherence to regimens ensures better treatment outcomes, but suboptimal drug levels may lead to the emergence of drug-resistant HIV variants [2, 3]. Therefore, the assessment of adherence to ART is important to predict virologic outcomes, disease progression, and death.

Many methods are used to evaluate the adherence to antiretroviral therapies, such as self-reported questionnaires, pill counting, the Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS), the visual analogue scale, and drug concentrations in plasma or urine [3, 4]. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods are obvious. Self-reported questionnaires and the visual analogue scale are often used in resource-limited countries because of their low cost and simplicity. However, both of these methods tend to overestimate patients’ adherence due to recall bias and social desirability [57]. Pill counts are not suggested to solely assess patients’ adherence [7]. In previous studies, though MEMS has shown good correlation with the HIV load, the estimation of adherence may be biased when assessed through MEMS [7, 8]. Measurement of drug concentrations in plasma and urine may be more sensitive indicators, however, both only provide the adherence within 1 to 2 days of sampling [911]. Alternatively, measuring drug concentrations in hair has the potential to provide an objective estimate of a long-term exposure, which will be more meaningful in predicting treatment outcomes and efficacy of ART [12]. In individual patients, hair growth varies from 0.5 to 1.5cm each month and drug concentrations in the hair root (hair 0.5–1.0 cm from the scalp) record the last month’s history of drug use. Thus a monthly history of drugs is recorded in the hair root[1315]. Many studies showed that hair drug concentrations can strongly predict virologic outcomes [1618].

The current recommended regimens in China include two nucleotide or nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and one non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) or protease inhibitor (PI). Since 2008, China’s National Free Antiretroviral Treatment Program (NFATP) had changed its first-line ART regimen by replacing didanosine (DDI) with lamivudine (3TC) [19, 20]. So far, 3TC has been the most widely used NRTI in China. In another research conducted in China, researchers concluded that lamivudine (3TC) produced better treatment outcomes with a higher virologic suppression rate and lower drug resistant rate [21]. At the same time, researchers admitted that adherence to treatment regimens should be given more attention in the future. According to the pharmacokinetic study of NRTI drugs such as 3TC, d4T, and AZT, they need be biologically activated through intracellular conversion to phosphorylated metabolites [22]. Thus, if the NRTI plasma concentration has any association with the intracellular 3TC concentration or can predict treatment outcomes still remains uncertain [23]. What is more, another study showed that 3TC plasma concentrations among patients may be influenced by many factors, such as different durations between the sampling time and the last dose, the variability of the body mass index, and renal conditions [24]. The elimination half-life of 3TC is as short as 3–4 hours and this may contribute to a large variation in 3TC plasma concentrations [25, 26]. Considering the long-term assessment of regimen adherence and the complex testing of intracellular 3TC active metabolite concentrations, we conducted this study to find if hair 3TC concentrations can predict virologic failure and drug resistance, and also compare the capacity of hair 3TC concentrations with self-reported adherence in predicting virologic responses.

Methods

Ethics Statement

The IRB of Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention approved this study and the approval number was X120331207. We obtained written informed consents.

Sample population and sample collection

We conducted a cross-sectional survey in HIV patients receiving the lamivudine regimen from 2013 to 2014. 287 patients were enrolled from Zhejiang, Anhui, and Henan Provinces. The inclusion criteria were: patients ≥ 18 years old, had received national free ART treatment for ≥12 months, current treatment regimen included lamivudine, and willingness and consent to participate. Patients who were treated with second-line regimens as the initial treatment were excluded. Basic information (age, sex, income per month, marital status, education, occupation, HIV transmission route, initial ART regiment, current ART regiment, duration of ART, missed dose in the past month, and ratio of on-time drug intake in the past month), blood specimens, and hair specimens for lamivudine were collected. Hair samples were collected from the occipital area as previously described because it has the lowest variability in hair growth rate [17, 27]. At least 30 strands of hair were cut as close to the scalp as possible and the distal portion labeled to denote directionality [28]. At least a 1 cm hair of sample was cut and at least 1cm of hair close to the scalp should be remained for testing. The hair specimens were placed in small plastic bags and were stored at room temperature in the dark to avoid excessive exposure to moisture. Blood samples were also collected for CD4+ cell count, HIV-1 RNA viral load testing, and genotypic drug resistance (HIVDR) testing as previously described [29, 30]. All the hair samples and blood samples were collected within the same hour. In accordance with the WHO survey guideline, successful viral suppression was defined as HIV RNA level <1,000 copies/mL using a quality-assured viral load assay. In samples with a viral load (VL) ≥1000 copies/mL, HIVDR genotyping was performed by in-house polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) at the National Center for AIDS/STD Control and Prevention of the China Center for Disease Control and Prevention (NCAIDS, China CDC).

Hair ART quantification

The hair 3TC concentration was determined using liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) at iPhase Pharma Services in Beijing, China. Briefly, 3TC concentrations in 1–1.5 cm hair samples near the scalp approximately represented the drug accumulation in the past month. Hair samples were cut into small segments, yielding approximately 2 mg of hair [31], and 50 μL of 50% methanol was added, and samples were whirled to blend well. Then 50 μL IS (0.02 μg/ml lamivudine-15N2,13C as an internal standard) and 0.9 ml methanol were added to each sample. Samples were shaken in a 37°C water bath overnight, followed by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 5 minutes. 500 μL supernatant was extracted and mixed with 500 μL deionized water, and then the mixture was whirled. 10 μL of the mixture was used for LC-MS/MS analysis.

The LC-MS/MS system consists of an Agilent 1200 Series pump (G1312A) and autosampler (G1367B), and an AB Sciex LC triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer. The mass spectrometer was set to electrospray ionization in a positive multiple reaction monitoring mode. The precursor/product transitions (m/z) were at 230.3 > 112.2 m/z for lamivudine and 233.2 > 115.3 m/z for the internal standard (IS) lamivudine-15N2, 13C. The declustering potential and collision energy were 30 V and 18 V, respectively, for lamivudine and IS. The source temperature was 550°C. The HPLC conditions were as follows: the column was an Agela venusil ASB C18, (50 × 4.6mm), 5 μm, 150Å, and the mobile phase was composed of methanol and HPLC-grade water. Elution was achieved with an isocratic flow of water:methanol (55:45, v:v) at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. Data processing was performed using Analyst 1.5 software.

The calibrated hair samples were prepared as follows: 2 mg of blank cut hair samples were placed into different test tubes, and 50 μL 0.4, 0.8, 2, 5, 20, 40, 64, or 80 ng/ml standard solutions was added. Then, these samples were treated in the same way as above. We controlled the relative standard deviation (RSD) of the standard curve at less than 15%. The linear range of the standard curve was 10–2000 ng/g.

Statistical analysis

Questionnaires were double-entered and validated with EpiData 3.1 (The EpiData Association, Denmark) and then were analyzed by the Statistical Analysis System (SAS 9.2, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and SPSS Statistics 19 (SPSS Inc., USA). Demographic variables were described with descriptive statistics and the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare hair 3TC concentrations among the three groups for virologic suppression, virologic failure without HIVDR, and virologic failure with HIVDR. In order to explore the association between the 3TC concentration in hair and virologic suppression/drug resistance, we used multivariate logistic regression to calculate the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. At the same time, we selected cut-off concentrations with receiver operating characteristics. In addition to investigating factors which have an influence on the relationship between hair 3TC concentrations and viral load, we used stratified analysis through the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test to calculate the P value among different stratifications. Hypothesis testing was two-sided with α = 0.05.

Results

A total of 287 patients from Zhejiang, Anhui, and Henan Provinces of China were enrolled in the survey. The characteristics of the subjects are shown in Table 1. The average age was 44.9±10.2 years, 52.6% were male, the proportion with an income per month of less than 1,000 Yuan was 74.6%, 76.0% were married, 19.5% had a high school or higher education level, and farmers accounted for 68.3%. The two major reported transmission routes were blood donations from former commercial plasma donations (former plasma donors were prople who acquired HIV infection through illegal hemapheresis in the mid-1990s in China.) and sexual intercourse, which accounted for 70.7% and 25.8%, respectively. The median duration of ART treatment was 87.4±39.2 months. The proportion of DDI-based initial ART regimens was 45.6%. 47.4% of current ART regimens were the second line of 3TC plus (AZT or TDF or d4T) plus LPV/r. Among these 287 patients, 79 (27.5%) had experienced virologic failure and 40 (13.9%) had drug resistant mutations.

Table 1. Characteristics of HIV patients receiving free ART in three provinces of China.

Number %
Total 287 100
Site
 Zhejiang 78 27.2
 Anhui 56 19.5
 Henan 153 53.3
Age (mean ± SD, year) 44.9±10.2
Sex
 Male 151 52.6
 Female 136 47.4
Income per month (RMB, yuan)
 0–1000 214 74.6
 1000–2000 12 4.2
 2000 or above 61 21.2
Marital status
 Married 218 76.0
 Other 69 24.0
Education
 Illiterate 59 20.6
 Primary school 90 31.3
 Junior high school 82 28.6
 High school or more 56 19.5
Occupation
 Farmer 196 68.3
 Others 91 31.7
HIV transmission route
 Blood Donation 203 70.7
 Sexual intercourse 74 25.8
 Drug injection 3 1.1
 Other 7 2.4
Initial ART regimen
 3TC+AZT+NVP/EFV 73 25.5
 3TC+D4T+NVP/EFV 77 26.8
 DDI +AZT+NVP/EFV 131 45.6
 3TC+TDF+NVP/EFV 4 1.4
 Others 2 0.7
Current ART regimen
 3TC+AZT+NVP/EFV 106 36.9
 3TC+ D4T +NVP/EFV 31 10.8
 3TC+ TDF+NVP/EFV 14 4.9
 3TC+AZT/TDF/D4T+LPV/r 136 47.4
Duration of ART (mean±SD, month) 87.4±39.2
Missed doses in the past month
 Yes 59 20.6
 No 228 79.4
Ratio of on-time drug intake in the past month
 90% or more 244 85.0
 75–90% 24 8.4
 50–75% 7 2.4
 <50% 12 4.2
HIV viral load (copies/ml) at the survey
 < 150 (detection limit) 158 55.1
 150–1000 50 17.4
 1000–10,000 30 10.4
 ≥ 10,000 49 17.1
Drug resistance at the survey*
 No 247 86.1
 Yes 40 13.9
CD4 cell count (cells/mm3) at the survey
 <200 44 15.3
 200–350 78 27.2
 ≥350 165 57.5

*Drug resistance was defined as viral load≥1000 copies/ml with drug resistant mutations.

Hair 3TC concentrations among people are shown in Fig 1. We divided the 287 patients into three groups according to viral load and drug resistant mutations. There were 208, 39, and 40 patients in the groups of virologic suppression, virologic failure without HIVDR, and virologic failure with HIVDR, respectively. The mean hair 3TC concentrations in the groups of virologic suppression, virologic failure without HIVDR, and virologic failure with HIVDR were 915.0±670.5 ng/g, 284.1±538.9 ng/g, and 648.4±616.9 ng/g, respectively. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the medians of hair 3TC concentrations among these three groups, and the difference among these groups were statistically significant (virologic failure with HIVDR vs. virologic suppression, p = 0.0125; virologic suppression vs. virologic failure without HIVDR, p<0.0001).

Fig 1. The box plot of hair 3TC concentration.

Fig 1

We then conducted a multivariate logistic regression model to examine the association of different indictors with the dichotomous outcome of virologic suppression after controlling for several variables, such as age, sex, income per month, marital status, education, occupation, HIV transmission route, initial ART regiment, current ART regiment, duration of ART, and CD4 count at the survey (S1 Table). The adjusted odds ratio of the 3TC concentration in hair was 11.5 (compared to 3TC concentration < 260ng/g, 95% CI 5.7, 23.2, p<0.001). Missing doses in the past month and the ratio of on-time drug intake in the past month were not included in the final model. What is more, after adjusting for demographic factors, only those with a higher 3TC contents in hair were observed to be at higher risk for emerging drug resistance than those with a lower 3TC contents (<180 ng/g)(AOR = 6.8, 95% CI 2.5,18.2, p<0.001).

Through the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), the optimal cut-off (that maximized the Youden Index) was 260ng/g. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values were 54.4%, 89.9%, 67.2%, and 83.9%, respectively. The large amount of false-negatives (patients with HIVDR always tend to have higher 3TC concentrations while experiencing virologic failure) resulted in a lower sensitivity. Thus, we constructed another receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) among patients without HIVDR, and the optimal cut-off was also approached at 260ng/g, with 76.9% sensitivity, 89.9% specificity, 58.8% positive predictive value, and 95.4% negative predictive value. The sensitivities and specificities at different hair 3TC concentrations are listed in Table 2. We also used interviewer-assisted questionnaires to assess the adherence in the past month, including missed doses in the past month and the ratio of on-time drug intake in the past month. When we used the threshold of hair 3TC concentration at 260ng/g, the hair 3TC concentration was a much stronger indicator than variables of self-reported adherence in predicting virologic failure. We examined whether demographic and treatment factors would influence the threshold of hair 3TC in predicting virologic failure. Stratified subgroups are listed in S2 Table. The Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to calculate the P value among different stratifications. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values were not significantly affected by most stratified factors, except for CD4+ cell counts, initial ART treatment, and current ART treatment. Patients who had higher CD4+ cell counts (≥350 cells/ml) had lower positive predictive values (77.8%, 77.8%, and 37.5% for <200 cells/ml, 200–350 cells/ml, and ≥350 cells/ml, respectively, p = 0.01) and higher negative predictive values (89.5%, 89.6%, and 98.4% for <200 cells/ml, 200–350 cells/ml, and ≥350 cells/ml, respectively, p = 0.01). What is more, we found that patients who had received 3TC as the initial ART treatment regimen had higher sensitivity (91.7% vs. 53.3%, p = 0.02). Receiving second-line ART treatment may lower the negative predictive values (91.9% vs. 98.2%, p = 0.04).

Table 2. Optimizing the threshold of hair 3TC concentration and comparing it with self-reported adherence among HIV patients without HIVDR (N = 247).

VL≥1000 VL<1000 Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV Youden Index
Hair 3TC<100 25 14
 ≥100 14 194 64.1% 93.3% 64.1% 93.3% 57.4%
Hair 3TC<200 29 20
 ≥200 10 188 74.4% 90.4% 59.2% 94.9% 64.7%
Hair 3TC<260 30 21
 ≥260 9 187 76.9% 89.9% 58.8% 95.4% 66.8%
Hair 3TC<300 30 25
 ≥300 9 183 76.9% 88.0% 54.5% 95.3% 64.9%
Hair 3TC<400 30 40
 ≥400 9 168 76.9% 80.8% 42.9% 94.9% 57.7%
Hair 3TC<500 30 51
 ≥500 9 157 76.9% 75.5% 37.0% 94.6% 52.4%
Missed dose in past month
 Yes 15 33
 No 24 175 38.5% 84.1% 31.3% 87.9% 22.6%
Ratio (90%) of on-time drug intake in the past month
 Yes 13 24
 No 26 184 33.3% 88.5% 35.1% 87.6% 21.8%

The threshold of hair 3TC concentrations associated with virologic failure with HIVDR is presented in Table 3. According to the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) among 79 HIV patients with a viral load≥1000 copies/ml, the optimal operating point on the ROC curve was 180ng/g with the area under the ROC curve of 0.72. This threshold corresponds to a sensitivity of 70.0%, a specificity of 74.4%, a positive predictive value of 73.7%, and a negative predictive value of 70.7%. The threshold of 180ng/g had a more balanced sensitivity and specificity than 300ng/g with the same Youden Index. Although hair 3TC concentrations had a lower sensitivity than self-reported adherence in predicting HIVDR, its specificity was an obvious advantage and the Youden Index was also higher (Table 3). Through the stratified analysis to explore factors which may influence the association between hair 3TC concentrations and the emergence of drug resistance (S3 Table), we found that 3TC in the initial treatment regimens only influenced the specificity in predicting HIVDR.

Table 3. Optimizing the threshold of hair 3TC concentration and comparing it with self-reported adherence among HIV patients with viral load≥1000copies/ml and HIVDR (N = 79).

With HIVDR Without HIVDR Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV Youden Index
Hair 3TC≥100 29 14
 <100 11 25 72.5% 64.1% 67.4% 69.4% 36.6%
Hair 3TC≥180 28 10
 <180 12 29 70.0% 74.4% 73.7% 70.7% 44.4%
Hair 3TC≥300 27 9
 <300 13 30 67.5% 76.9% 75.0% 69.8% 44.4%
Hair 3TC≥400 24 9
 <400 16 30 60.0% 76.9% 72.7% 65.2% 36.9%
Missed dose in past month
 No 29 24
 Yes 11 15 72.5% 38.5% 54.7% 57.7% 11.0%
Ratio (90%) of on-time drug intake in the past month
 No 34 26
 Yes 6 13 85.0% 33.3% 56.7% 68.4% 18.3%

Discussion

In our study, we first demonstrated that 3TC concentrations in hair are significantly different among groups of virologic suppression, virologic failure without HIVDR, and virologic failure with HIVDR. Patients who had a suppressed viral load had the highest hair concentration, illustrating their favorable adherence. Intermediate concentrations in virologic failure patients were associated with the emergence of drug resistance mutations. This may be because of irregular missed doses or non-adherence [16, 32].

In addition, we also found that hair 3TC concentrations have a strong association with virologic outcomes and are able to give a comparatively accurate prediction of virologic outcomes. According to a previous report conducted by Gandhi [11], the odds ratio for virologic suppression was 39.8 for those with hair LPV/r levels in the top tertile compared to the lowest tertile, and for patients with ATV, the adjusted OR was 7.7. Another study of hair NVP concentrations reported that the odds ratio for viral suppression in the highest concentration tertile was 9.17 compared to the lowest tertile [18]. Other studies also reported the sensitivity and specificity of predicting virologic outcome with drug concentrations in hair. A study of the IDV concentration in hair reported that the sensitivity and specificity of predicting virologic outcomes were 75% and 78%, respectively [16]. Another study concluded that the LPV/r concentration in hair had a PPV of 79% and a NPV of 89% [17]. Our study found that the hair 3TC concentration is reliable in assessing patients’ adherence. However, there were two reasons that may limit the sensitivity and specificity. First, patients with HIVDR had a large amount of false-negatives (patients who had high hair 3TC concentrations while experiencing virologic failure at the same time) which reduced the sensitivity. Second, HAART is always a combined therapy and the detection of one drug may reduce the specificity.

According to our previous studies, self-reported adherence variables of the questionnaire were significantly associated with HIV virologic failure and/or HIVDR, including missed doses and the ratio of on-time drug intake in the past month [33, 34]. The self-report adherence variables were suggested by the WHO HIVDR surveillance protocol that was particularly designed for resource-limited settings [35]. What is more, the self-report questionnaires are quite simple and less costly compared with other methods. However, the sensitivity of self-reports was still low and proved that self-report questionnaires would overestimate the adherence. The results may be related to social desirability and recall bias [36]. Our study found that the hair 3TC concentration was a stronger indicator than the self-reported adherence questionnaires in predicting virologic outcomes and HIVDR. Also, hair collection is easy and noninvasive and the storage is less limiting [37]. Other studies showed that plasma 3TC concentrations tend to largely vary among patients and there is no consensus of whether the plasma concentration can predict treatment response [22, 24]. Based on our study, hair 3TC concentrations could be a better measurement of the adherence monitoring index.

The limitations of our study were: first, our sample recruitment from only three provinces could not guarantee a representative sample of all HIV patients in China. The size was not large enough and did not include all kinds of patients in China, which may have lowered the accuracy of the threshold value. Second, most of the participants had been treated for a long-time which could lead to more patients with HIVDR, while hair 3TC concentrations may only reflect the ART treatment adherence in the past month. The relationship between hair 3TC concentrations and HIVDR might be underestimated. Third, data collection did not include any pharmacokinetic related indicators, which may influence the association between hair 3TC concentrations and viral load. We performed this study in a cross-section manner and a longitudinal assessment is required and will be done in the future in order to show causality.

However, these limitations should not affect our conclusion that hair 3TC concentrations can strongly predict virologic outcomes in HIV patients and are a better indicator than self-reported adherence questionnaires in predicting virologic outcomes and HIVDR. Testing lamivudine levels in hair is a simple and safe method for evaluating the ART adherence over a period of months in resource-limited settings. China should establish a centralized unit of drug resistance surveillance to monitor ARV adherence through testing hair concentration of drugs in HIV patients.

Supporting Information

S1 Table. The impact factors of virologic failure.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Stratified analysis to explore factors influencing the association between viral loads and hair 3TC concentrations.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Stratified analysis of factors which may influence the association between the hair 3TC concentration and the emergence of drug resistance.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Dr. Edward C. Mignot, Shandong University, for linguistic advice.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2012ZX10001-002 and 2009DFB30420), the Chinese State Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Develop Grant, and the International Development Research Center of Canada (grant #104519-010). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Fletcher CV. Pharmacologic considerations for therapeutic success with antiretroviral agents. Ann Pharmacother 1999,33:989–995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Friedland GH, Williams A. Attaining higher goals in HIV treatment: the central importance of adherence. AIDS 1999,13 Suppl 1:S61–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Marcellin F, Spire B, Carrieri MP, Roux P. Assessing adherence to antiretroviral therapy in randomized HIV clinical trials: a review of currently used methods. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2013,11:239–250. 10.1586/eri.13.8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gandhi M, Greenblatt RM. Hair it is: the long and short of monitoring antiretroviral treatment. Ann Intern Med 2002,137:696–697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Amico KR, Fisher WA, Cornman DH, Shuper PA, Redding CG, Konkle-Parker DJ, et al. Visual analog scale of ART adherence: association with 3-day self-report and adherence barriers. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2006,42:455–459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Arnsten JH, Demas PA, Farzadegan H, Grant RW, Gourevitch MN, Chang CJ, et al. Antiretroviral therapy adherence and viral suppression in HIV-infected drug users: comparison of self-report and electronic monitoring. Clin Infect Dis 2001,33:1417–1423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liu H, Golin CE, Miller LG, Hays RD, Beck CK, Sanandaji S, et al. A comparison study of multiple measures of adherence to HIV protease inhibitors. Ann Intern Med 2001,134:968–977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Berg KM, Arnsten JH. Practical and conceptual challenges in measuring antiretroviral adherence. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2006,43 Suppl 1:S79–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Duong M, Piroth L, Peytavin G, Forte F, Kohli E, Grappin M, et al. Value of patient self-report and plasma human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitor level as markers of adherence to antiretroviral therapy: relationship to virologic response. Clin Infect Dis 2001,33:386–392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kumar AK, Ramachandran G, Kumar P, Kumaraswami V, Swaminathan S. Can urine lamivudine be used to monitor antiretroviral treatment adherence? MedGenMed 2006,8:53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gandhi M, Ameli N, Bacchetti P, Gange SJ, Anastos K, Levine A, et al. Protease inhibitor levels in hair strongly predict virologic response to treatment. AIDS 2009,23:471–478. 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328325a4a9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Huang Y, Gandhi M, Greenblatt RM, Gee W, Lin ET, Messenkoff N. Sensitive analysis of anti-HIV drugs, efavirenz, lopinavir and ritonavir, in human hair by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 2008,22:3401–3409. 10.1002/rcm.3750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nakahara Y. Hair analysis for abused and therapeutic drugs. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 1999,733:161–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kintz P, Tracqui A, Mangin P. Pharmacological studies on meprobamate incorporation in human beard hair. Int J Legal Med 1993,105:283–287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Graham K, Koren G, Klein J, Schneiderman J, Greenwald M. Determination of gestational cocaine exposure by hair analysis. JAMA 1989,262:3328–3330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bernard L, Vuagnat A, Peytavin G, Hallouin MC, Bouhour D, Nguyen TH, et al. Relationship between levels of indinavir in hair and virologic response to highly active antiretroviral therapy. Ann Intern Med 2002,137:656–659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.van Zyl GU, van Mens TE, McIlleron H, Zeier M, Nachega JB, Decloedt E, et al. Low lopinavir plasma or hair concentrations explain second-line protease inhibitor failures in a resource-limited setting. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2011,56:333–339. 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31820dc0cc [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Baxi SM, Greenblatt RM, Bacchetti P, Jin C, French AL, Keller MJ, et al. Nevirapine Concentration in Hair Samples Is a Strong Predictor of Virologic Suppression in a Prospective Cohort of HIV-Infected Patients. PLoS One 2015,10:e0129100 10.1371/journal.pone.0129100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Z F. China Free ART Manual.1st ednBeijing:. People's Medical Publishing House; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhang F W Y, Wang J et al. China Free ART Manual. 3nd ednBeijing:. People's Medical Publishing House; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Xing H, Ruan Y, Hsi JH, Kan W, Liao L, Leng X, et al. Reductions in virological failure and drug resistance in Chinese antiretroviral-treated patients due to lamivudine-based regimens, 2003–12. J Antimicrob Chemother 2015,70:2097–2103. 10.1093/jac/dkv078 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hemanth Kumar AK, Ramachandran G, Rajasekaran S, Padmapriyadarsini C, Narendran G, Anitha S, et al. Pharmacokinetics of lamivudine & stavudine in generic fixed-dose combinations in HIV-1 infected adults in India. Indian J Med Res 2009,130:451–457. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Back D, Gatti G, Fletcher C, Garaffo R, Haubrich R, Hoetelmans R, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring in HIV infection: current status and future directions. AIDS 2002,16 Suppl 1:S5–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Minzi O, Mugoyela V, Gustafsson L. Correlation between lamivudine plasma concentrations and patient self-reported adherence to antiretroviral treatment in experienced HIV patients. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2011,7:441–446. 10.2147/TCRM.S23625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Panhard X, Legrand M, Taburet AM, Diquet B, Goujard C, Mentre F, et al. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of lamivudine, stavudine and zidovudine in controlled HIV-infected patients on HAART. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2007,63:1019–1029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yuen GJ, Lou Y, Bumgarner NF, Bishop JP, Smith GA, Otto VR, et al. Equivalent steady-state pharmacokinetics of lamivudine in plasma and lamivudine triphosphate within cells following administration of lamivudine at 300 milligrams once daily and 150 milligrams twice daily. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004,48:176–182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Huang Y, Yang Q, Yoon K, Lei Y, Shi R, Gee W, et al. Microanalysis of the antiretroviral nevirapine in human hair from HIV-infected patients by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 2011,401:1923–1933. 10.1007/s00216-011-5278-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gandhi M, Ameli N, Bacchetti P, Anastos K, Gange SJ, Minkoff H, et al. Atazanavir concentration in hair is the strongest predictor of outcomes on antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis 2011,52:1267–1275. 10.1093/cid/cir131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang X, Yang L, Li H, Zuo L, Liang S, Liu W, et al. Factors associated with HIV virologic failure among patients on HAART for one year at three sentinel surveillance sites in China. Curr HIV Res 2011,9:103–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ruan Y, Xing H, Wang X, Tang H, Wang Z, Liu H, et al. Virologic outcomes of first-line HAART and associated factors among Chinese patients with HIV in three sentinel antiretroviral treatment sites. Trop Med Int Health 2010,15:1357–1363. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02621.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.LeBeau MA, Montgomery MA, Brewer JD. The role of variations in growth rate and sample collection on interpreting results of segmental analyses of hair. Forensic Sci Int 2011,210:110–116. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.02.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Condra JH. Resisting resistance: maximizing the durability of antiretroviral therapy. Ann Intern Med 1998,128:951–954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Leng X, Liang S, Ma Y, Dong Y, Kan W, Goan D, et al. HIV virological failure and drug resistance among injecting drug users receiving first-line ART in China. BMJ Open 2014,4:e005886 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005886 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Xing H, Ruan Y, Li J, Shang H, Zhong P, Wang X, et al. HIV drug resistance and its impact on antiretroviral therapy in Chinese HIV-infected patients. PLoS One 2013,8:e54917 10.1371/journal.pone.0054917 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.WHO global strategy for the surveillance and monitoring of HIV drug resistance 2012. Available: http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/drugresistance/drug_resistance_strategy/en/. Accessed 2014 April 30.
  • 36.Mannheimer S, Friedland G, Matts J, Child C, Chesney M. The consistency of adherence to antiretroviral therapy predicts biologic outcomes for human immunodeficiency virus-infected persons in clinical trials. Clin Infect Dis 2002,34:1115–1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gandhi M, Yang Q, Bacchetti P, Huang Y. Short communication: A low-cost method for analyzing nevirapine levels in hair as a marker of adherence in resource-limited settings. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2014,30:25–28. 10.1089/AID.2013.0239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Table. The impact factors of virologic failure.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Stratified analysis to explore factors influencing the association between viral loads and hair 3TC concentrations.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Stratified analysis of factors which may influence the association between the hair 3TC concentration and the emergence of drug resistance.

(DOCX)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES