Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Heart logoLink to Heart
. 1997 Jun;77(6):539–542. doi: 10.1136/hrt.77.6.539

Measuring QT dispersion: man versus machine.

A Murray 1, N B McLaughlin 1, R W Campbell 1
PMCID: PMC484797  PMID: 9227298

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare manual and computer automated techniques for measuring QT dispersion. DESIGN: Assessment of the ability of manual and automatic measurements of QT dispersion to discriminate between a normal group and two cardiac groups. SUBJECTS: 12 simultaneous electrocardiogram leads were recorded from 25 healthy volunteers, 25 subjects after myocardial infarction, and 25 with cardiac arrhythmias. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For each subject, QT dispersion was measured as the difference between the maximum and minimum QT from all 12 leads and separately for only those leads with T amplitudes of > 100 microV and for those > 250 microV. RESULTS: Manual QT dispersion (T > 100 microV) was greater (P < 0.02) in the arrhythmia patients (mean (SD), 45 (21) ms), but not the infarction patients (54 (36) ms), than in the normal subjects (39 (13) ms). There were no significant differences when all T waves were included. QT dispersion was significantly reduced by an average of 30% when T waves < 100 microV were excluded, and by 51% when those < 250 microV were excluded. Automatic techniques gave different measurements for dispersion in comparison with manual measurements. Three of the four automatic techniques detected significant differences between normal and both patient groups when no leads were excluded (P < 0.01) as well as when T waves < 100 microV were excluded (with increased significance, P < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of QT dispersion from small T waves increases measurement variability and reduces the potential for detecting clinical differences. Automatic measurement of QT dispersion gives different results from manual measurement, but can satisfactorily discriminate between normal and abnormal groups with good quality electrocardiograms.

Full text

PDF
539

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barr C. S., Naas A., Freeman M., Lang C. C., Struthers A. D. QT dispersion and sudden unexpected death in chronic heart failure. Lancet. 1994 Feb 5;343(8893):327–329. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91164-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buja G., Miorelli M., Turrini P., Melacini P., Nava A. Comparison of QT dispersion in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy between patients with and without ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death. Am J Cardiol. 1993 Oct 15;72(12):973–976. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)91118-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Glancy J. M., Garratt C. J., Woods K. L., de Bono D. P. Use of lead adjustment formulas for QT dispersion after myocardial infarction. Br Heart J. 1995 Dec;74(6):676–679. doi: 10.1136/hrt.74.6.676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Higham P. D., Furniss S. S., Campbell R. W. QT dispersion and components of the QT interval in ischaemia and infarction. Br Heart J. 1995 Jan;73(1):32–36. doi: 10.1136/hrt.73.1.32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hii J. T., Wyse D. G., Gillis A. M., Duff H. J., Solylo M. A., Mitchell L. B. Precordial QT interval dispersion as a marker of torsade de pointes. Disparate effects of class Ia antiarrhythmic drugs and amiodarone. Circulation. 1992 Nov;86(5):1376–1382. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.86.5.1376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hnatkova K., Malik M., Kautzner J., Gang Y., Camm A. J. Adjustment of QT dispersion assessed from 12 lead electrocardiograms for different numbers of analysed electrocardiographic leads: comparison of stability of different methods. Br Heart J. 1994 Oct;72(4):390–396. doi: 10.1136/hrt.72.4.390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Laguna P., Thakor N. V., Caminal P., Jané R., Yoon H. R., Bayés de Luna A., Marti V., Guindo J. New algorithm for QT interval analysis in 24-hour Holter ECG: performance and applications. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1990 Jan;28(1):67–73. doi: 10.1007/BF02441680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McLaughlin N. B., Campbell R. W., Murray A. Accuracy of four automatic QT measurement techniques in cardiac patients and healthy subjects. Heart. 1996 Nov;76(5):422–426. doi: 10.1136/hrt.76.5.422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Merri M., Benhorin J., Alberti M., Locati E., Moss A. J. Electrocardiographic quantitation of ventricular repolarization. Circulation. 1989 Nov;80(5):1301–1308. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.80.5.1301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mirvis D. M. Spatial variation of QT intervals in normal persons and patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 Mar;5(3):625–631. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80387-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Murray A., McLaughlin N. B., Bourke J. P., Doig J. C., Furniss S. S., Campbell R. W. Errors in manual measurement of QT intervals. Br Heart J. 1994 Apr;71(4):386–390. doi: 10.1136/hrt.71.4.386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. O'Donnell J., Lovelace D. E., Knoebel S. B., McHenry P. L. Behavior of the terminal T wave during exercise in normal subjects, patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease and apparently healthy subjects with abnormal ST segment depression. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 Jan;5(1):78–84. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80087-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heart are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES