Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Qual Health Res. 2015 Oct 28;27(2):182–190. doi: 10.1177/1049732315613311

Negotiating violence in the context of transphobia and criminalization: The experiences of trans sex workers in Vancouver, Canada

Tara Lyons 1, Andrea Krüsi 1, Leslie Pierre 2, Thomas Kerr 1, Will Small 3, Kate Shannon 1
PMCID: PMC4848175  NIHMSID: NIHMS742448  PMID: 26515922

Abstract

A growing body of international evidence suggests that sex workers face a disproportionate burden of violence, with significant variations across social, cultural, and economic contexts. Research on trans sex workers has documented high incidents of violence; however investigations into the relationships between violence and social-structural contexts are limited. Therefore, the objective of this study was to qualitatively examine how social-structural contexts shape trans sex workers’ experiences of violence. In-depth semistructured interviews were conducted with 33 trans sex workers in Vancouver, Canada between June 2012 and May 2013. Three themes emerged that illustrated how social-structural contexts of transphobia and criminalization shaped violent experiences: (1) transphobic violence, (2) clients’ discovery of participants’ gender identity, and (3) negative police responses to experiences of violence. The findings demonstrate the need for shifts in sex work laws and culturally relevant anti-stigma programs and policies to address transphobia.

Keywords: sex work, violence, police, transgender, criminalization, structural violence, participatory analysis, qualitative, interviews, Vancouver


A growing body of international evidence suggests that sex workers face a disproportionate burden of violence compared to the general population, with significant variations occurring across social, legal, cultural, and economic contexts (Beattie et al., 2010; Deering et al., 2014; Kurtz, Surratt, Inciardi, & Kiley, 2004; Lowman, 2000). The majority of research has focused on women sex workers with a growing body of research on trans sex workers –those whose gender identity or expression differs from their assigned birth sex—emerging in global settings (Bhattacharjya et al., 2015; Infante, Sosa-Rubi, & Cuadra, 2009; Rhodes, Simic, Baros, Platt, & Zikic, 2008; Socías, Marshall, Arístegui, Romero, et al., 2014). This research suggests that trans sex workers may be particularly vulnerable to violence due to a complex interplay of social-structural contexts. For example, Hwang & Nuttbrock (2007)’s study of three trans communities demonstrated how social-structural contexts of racism and economic barriers shaped vulnerabilities to violence. Additionally, within the epidemiological literature, trans women sex workers have been found to experience significantly higher rates of physical and sexual violence by clients than cisgender sex workers—individuals whose assigned sex corresponds to their gender identity and gender expression (Johnson, 2013)—(Cohan et al., 2006; Nemoto, Bodeker, & Iwamoto, 2011).

Prior research has shown that many trans individuals face stigma (Bockting, Miner, Swinburne Romine, Hamilton, & Coleman, 2013; Logie, James, Tharao, & Loutfy, 2012; Sevelius, 2013); stigma which can contribute to violence (Lombardi, Wilchins, Priesing, & Malouf, 2001; Mogul, Ritchie, & Whitlock, 2011; Perry & Dyck, 2014). For example, youth who display gender non-conforming behaviors may face family rejection and end up experiencing violence in street-based environments (Landolt, Bartholomew, Saffrey, Oram, & Perlman, 2004; Marksamer, 2008). Stigma, including barriers to healthcare and economic opportunities, greatly impacts the health of trans sex workers (Roche & Keith, 2014; Sausa, Keatley, & Operario, 2007). It has been suggested that sex work is one of a few viable economic opportunities for trans individuals (Poteat et al., 2015; Xavier et al., 2013) and a relationship has been found between barriers to economic security and violence among trans persons (Lombardi, et al., 2001). Trans sex workers are also known to experience high rates of police-perpetuated violence in some settings (Rhodes, et al., 2008), and the adverse impact of such violence on healthcare avoidance by trans sex workers has been observed (Socías, Marshall, Arístegui, Romero, et al., 2014). Therefore, social-structural contexts shape trans persons’ experiences of violence and associated impacts on health.

It is also understood that certain populations of trans sex workers face a range of stigma and barriers that heighten HIV vulnerabilities (Infante, et al., 2009; Jürgens, Csete, Amon, Baral, & Beyrer, 2010; Poteat, et al., 2015). Research has generally focused on trans women sex workers relationships and sexual practices (e.g., condom use) with clients and intimate partners. Often, however, the contexts in which relationships are situated remain overlooked despite knowledge that social-structural contexts shape health and experiences of violence (Rhodes, Singer, Bourgois, Friedman, & Strathdee, 2005; Shannon et al., 2015).

Social-structural contexts include the social, political, and legal contexts in which this study is situated. Our study takes place in the Downtown Eastside neighborhood of Vancouver, British Columbia where since the 1980’s over 67 women, a third of whom were Indigenous and many of whom were involved in sex work, have been murdered or are missing (Amnesty International, 2009; Oppal, 2012). Additionally, Canada’s sex work laws have recently undergone changes after legal challenges by sex workers. In December 2013, three sections of Canada’s prostitution laws, including communicating in public for the purchase of prostitution, were ruled unconstitutional for violating sex workers’ rights (Sampson, 2014). In response, a year later the Canadian government implemented new prostitution legislation called the ‘Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act’ that criminalizes the purchase of sex and the advertisement of sexual services for the first time in Canadian history, and continues to criminalize communication in public for the purpose of prostitution (Government of Canada, November 6, 2014). This legislation has been criticized for its potential to contribute to even greater harm to sex workers (Krüsi et al., 2014; Sampson, 2014). Thus, this study is situated within a historic context of violence against sex workers and an evolving sex work legal framework.

In summary, it has been documented that sex workers and trans persons are situated within social-structural contexts that can lead to health inequities and violence. While cisgender sex workers’ experiences in the study setting have been well documented, trans sex workers’ experiences of violence have been largely overlooked or combined with sexual minorities. Thus, the objective of this exploratory study was to investigate the lived experiences of violence and social-structural contexts shaping violence among trans sex workers in a Canadian setting.

Method

Study Design

This study is situated within a qualitative and ethnographic examination of the physical, social and policy factors that influence HIV prevention, treatment, and care for sex workers and people who use drugs, which includes longitudinal epidemiological cohorts of street and off-street sex workers (An Evaluation of Sex Workers Health Access) and people who use drugs (The At Risk Youth Study, Vancouver Injection Drug Users Study, and AIDS Care Cohort to Evaluate Access to Survival Services). Cohort participants, who are recruited through community outreach and from research offices located in different neighborhoods of the city, complete structured questionnaires and clinical assessments bi-annually. The cohort methods have been described in detail elsewhere (Shannon et al., 2007; Strathdee et al., 1997; Tyndall et al., 2003; Wood, Stoltz, Montaner, & Kerr, 2006). Participants who identified as transgender, transsexual, genderqueer, or two-spirit1 in their baseline interviews (e.g., In the last 6 months, which of the following best describes your gender identity (check all that apply)) were contacted via phone or email by Tara Lyons or frontline staff and invited to participate in the study. In addition, three participants were referred to the study by other participants. Eligibility for this qualitative study included: a) having ever exchanged sex for money, b) residing in the Greater Vancouver area, c) being 14 years of age or older, and d) identifying as persons whose gender identity or expression differs from their assigned sex at birth.

Between June 2012 and May 2013, Tara Lyons conducted 43 in-depth semistructured interviews with 33 trans sex workers. Follow-up interviews were conducted with 10 participants to expand on sex work-specific issues that arose during the first interviews, and more in-depth sex work questions were added to subsequent interviews. Interviews were approximately one hour and no participants declined to be interviewed or left the study after being interviewed. Interviews were audio recorded with permission and participants were paid CDN$20 to compensate for their time. All participants signed a written consent form that was reviewed verbally prior to the interview. This study holds ethical approval through Providence Health Care/University of British Columbia Research Ethics Board. Pseudonyms are used to protect the identity of participants.

Analysis

Interview and ethnographic data was analyzed using a theory- and data-driven approach (DeCuir-Gunby, Marshall, & McCulloch, 2011) guided by a framework that positions health as an outcome of social-structural contexts (Rhodes, et al., 2005; Shannon et al., 2008). Interviews were transcribed verbatim (excluding names) and imported into ATLAS.ti (version 7) qualitative data analysis software to organize the data analysis. Tara Lyons conducted the first-level open coding. Additional data- and thematic- driven codes and sub-codes were created during second- and third-level coding using a participatory analysis approach developed by Tara Lyons and two trans participants who were hired as researchers. Three participants were invited to participate in the data analysis and one declined. Tara Lyons approached participants after their interview in-person or via email on the subjective basis of 1) power dynamics (e.g., comfort in challenging her ideas) and 2) engagement and interest during the interview. It was not possible to invite every participant to engage in the analysis due to financial and time constraints. To further preserve confidentiality during the analysis process any identifying information was removed from the text and research assistants signed a confidentiality agreement.

At each participatory analysis session a hard copy of all the quotations associated with a first-level code (e.g., drug use) was printed and then split in half, with one half of the papers analyzed independently by each person. As a second step, the sections were exchanged in order for each section to be analyzed twice, once by Tara Lyons and once by a trans researcher. As a result, the data was analyzed three times. We validated the codes, corrected any errors, and discussed theoretical concepts, such as structural violence, during the analysis sessions. New codes were also pulled from the analysis using an inductive approach (Thomas, 2006). For example, a research assistant developed a ‘client shame’ code during this level of coding to indicate how a client’s shame after sexual activity could lead to violence; a code that would have otherwise been missed. Codes were separated analytically into sub-codes and were imported into the software, along with new codes and theoretical notes that were imported as memos, and reviewed during a subsequent analysis session. The 24 one-on-one analysis sessions ranged from 2 to 3 hours and were held at a research office. This approach was initiated to ensure that data was not solely analyzed by Tara Lyons, a queer cisgender woman. Using a participatory analysis approach enriched and contextualized the research findings, and provided an opportunity to engage with research participants in the co-construction of knowledge (Fortin, Jackson, Maher, & Moravac, 2014; Shannon, et al., 2007).

Results

Participants ranged in age from 23 to 52 years of age, with an average age of 39 years. Twenty-three (69.7%) participants identified as having Indigenous ancestry (inclusive of status or non-status First Nations and Métis2), 7 (21.2%) identified as White and 3 identified as Filipino, Asian and ‘other’ visible minority respectively. Approximately half of the sample (54.5% or n=18) reported current use of illicit drugs, an additional 5 participants (15.2%) reported only cannabis use, and 10 (30.3%) reported no current drug use. The majority of participants (n=26, 78.8%) were currently engaged in sex work and of those, 19 (73.1%) solicited in street sex work environments with the remainder soliciting clients online and/or working with regular clients in indoor environments. Among the 30 participants also enrolled in the cohort studies, 60% (n=18) were living with HIV. Of the 3 individuals recruited from outside the cohort studies, 1 self-reported living with HIV and 2 did not self-report their HIV status.

Gender

All participants had been assigned male sex at birth; however they did not all identify as women and many used more than one category to describe their gender (e.g., transsexual and two-spirit). Participants most often described their gender as transgender (n=16) and as women (n=8). Seven participants identified as transsexual and 6 participants identified as two-spirit. Three participants reported dressing as a woman for sex work but had a masculine gender expression in other contexts. As one two-spirit individual explained, “When I was working…I’d dress up [as a woman] at night and then during the daytime I’d dress as a guy.” The final participant identified as androgynous after living as a trans woman for many years. Thus, there was a range of gender identity and expression in the sample and some participants’ gender expression varied over time and with sex work.

Our analyses revealed that violence was ubiquitous among trans sex workers in this setting and was shaped by the overlapping social-structural contexts of transphobia—the discrimination of and negative attitudes towards individuals because of perceived gender identity and gender expression (Bettcher, 2007)—and criminalization of sex work. Three themes that emerged from the data are detailed below.

Transphobic Violence

Participants described experiencing violence from clients because of their gender. As Kylie explained,

[He] almost stabbed me… I seen that knife and I jumped out…He swung at me, but he never got me. I got out of the truck just in time… I think you know ‘cause I was trans and he didn’t like it.

Annie explained how transphobia shaped her work experiences and how her experience compared to cisgender sex workers:

It’s different in the way you have to be careful because a lot of people wanna try [sex with a trans sex worker]. And after they’ve tried it, they get the guilt and they can’t deal with it…they can’t deal with their emotions. And that’s when it becomes rage.

Consequently, a second theme that emerged was negotiating gender expression with clients as a way to reduce potential violence.

Gender Identity Discovery

Participants described how violent incidents occurred as a result of clients’ misreading or discovering one’s gender identity while negotiating the terms of the sex work activity or during the transaction. Jasmine explained a violent incident:

I got beat up in a public washroom. I got this cheekbone cracked over ten dollars… We were in the cubical there and he wanted his ten dollars back ‘cause he found out I was trans. I said no. My face was like that [swollen]. I couldn’t even open my eye.

Didn’t get the ten dollars though. I jumped out of the cube and got away. Participants did not necessarily intentionally pass as cisgender; rather clients would at times misread gender, which put participants in the position of having to disclose their gender while negotiating the terms of the date. This disclosure, given the context of transphobia in which participants are situated, put them at risk of potential violence. Below are two examples that detail how participants feared being murdered if clients discovered their gender identity.

My rule is that when a car pulls up, I tell them right away because it’s only fair for them to know. I don’t try and mask who I am. … I know that there’s other girls out there that do that but I think that that’s a good way to get beat up or murdered.

– Bree

It’s good that way up front…because if they find out that you’re not a girl, and you tell them that you’re a girl, your life is at risk. They might kill you. Because there’s some guys out there that are homophobic and they don’t wanna be with a guy at all and they might just kill you once they find out so I don’t do that. I don’t play that danger anymore.

- Leila

In the context of transphobia, participants feared for their safety and their lives if clients discovered their gender. As a result some employed disclosure strategies to protect against client violence, while others managed potential client violence differently. Pat explained:

They normally don’t [find out] and I’m pretty good at keeping myself unreadable. Also when I get into a car I basically can sense whether or not, if the possibility that I do end up getting found out happens, that I will still stay safe.

Additionally, some participants resisted continuously disclosing their gender identity, such as Mindy who explained, “I don’t disclose what I am, I refuse.”

Police Inaction

Participants revealed that did not report client violence to police because, as Jasmine explained, “It’s useless. Why even report it ‘cause nothing’s gonna be done.” Participants felt the police would not act on their behalf if they reported violence, and this was attributed to stigma related to sex work, gender, and drug use. Thea explained,

One of my trans girlfriend’s got killed… She got wrapped up and thrown in a dumpster. And [the police] sorta knew [the description of] the truck, but they didn’t pursue it too much. Every time a [trans person] goes they never do it too hard. Unless the guy is right there with blood dripping on his hands.

Jasmine described how police responded to her being violently assaulted by a client.

Took the police 22 minutes to get there. Why, because it was a transsexual prostitute. Let her get killed, who cares. … And I was doing this naked too. Getting dragged up and down the hall screaming for my life. Anyway the police get there and I said call the ambulance, I need an ambulance, I’m gonna have a heart attack and they said, fuck you, die junkie. … I was begging and begging.

Police inaction reinforced participants’ feelings of deserving violence. For example, after describing a violent physical assault by a client Trace explained how they worried about being arrested for sex work if they sought medical care.

I just went home and I told my friend this is what happened and they wanted me to go see a doctor, but I was too embarrassed by the whole ordeal and I just didn’t want to. I didn’t want to get in trouble ‘cause I thought I would get arrested for being on the streets prostituting myself, so I thought well I guess I was kind of asking for it.

Discussion

Responding to calls for research that situates gender as central to sex workers’ lives (Bhattacharjya, et al., 2015), our study explored how the social-structural contexts of transphobia and criminalization shaped trans sex workers experiences of violence. The findings illustrated that gender was intimately intertwined with the remarkable violence trans sex workers experienced. This violence impacted working conditions and interactions with clients and police. In particular, the findings of transphobic violence and gender identity discovery tease out how transphobia, or cissexism (Serano, 2007), is at the core of the expectation that sex workers disclose their gender to every client. Within this social-structural context trans individuals are perceived to violate gender norms and are subject to continual gender policing. Trans women are considered to be deceivers (not ‘real’ women) and this is used to justify transphobic violence (Bettcher, 2007; Perry & Dyck, 2014; Schilt & Westbrook, 2009; Serano, 2007). Hence, the responsibility is placed upon trans sex workers to disclose their gender or face violence instead of responsibility being placed on clients to not be violent. Research undertaken in international settings also found trans women sex workers faced client violence related to discovery of their gender (Bhattacharjya, et al., 2015; Nemoto, Operario, Keatley, & Villegas, 2004; Reisner et al., 2009; Simić & Rhodes, 2009). Thus, this study contributes to the literature by demonstrating how trans sex workers adapt their gender expression as a way to manage client violence.

Additionally, drawing on concepts of structural and symbolic violence facilitates an understanding of why participants in our study felt it was not in their best interests to report client violence to police. Symbolic violence is the process whereby the oppression of marginalized groups is regarded and enacted upon as natural and as part of this process individuals come to participate in their own subjection (Bourdieu, 2000); a process that maintains dominant relationships (e.g., relationships between police and sex workers) (Bourdieu, 1994). Structural violence is embedded within social structures and refers to political and economic arrangements that result in harm (Farmer, Nizeye, Stulac, & Keshavjee, 2006). It is often concealed, like symbolic violence, due to its internalization and institutionalization (Scheper-Hughes, 1996). Structural violence, like stigma (Link & Phelan, 2001) depends upon social, economic, and political power and inequality (Galtung, 1969). Thus, drawing on the concepts of structural and symbolic violence can help elucidate how the police maintain and reinforce their dominant relationship over trans sex workers by not responding appropriately to their experiences of violence. The internalization of symbolic and structural violence is also illustrated by Trace’s above example of not reporting client violence because they felt they were “asking for it.”

Police and sex work laws have historically not protected trans sex workers (Ross, 2012; Sausa, et al., 2007), including in our study setting where the police infamously ignored calls from the community to investigate missing women and sex workers (Oppal, 2012). This historical context contributes to trans sex workers’ reluctance to report violence or to engage with police (Namaste, 2000; Rhodes, et al., 2008; Stotzer, 2009) as demonstrated in our study. Lack of police response to violence against trans sex workers is firmly rooted within the context of criminalization, where sex workers are considered criminals, and within the context of transphobia, where trans persons are framed as deviant.

Given the inclusion of two-spirit individuals in this study and the over-representation of Indigenous participants it must be noted that the violence experienced by participants in the study is also situated within social-structural contexts of racism, poverty, and colonialism (Hunt, 2013; Simpson, 2004). Colonialism and the ongoing attempts by the state to destroy Indigenous peoples and cultures, including residential schools and displacement of land (Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada, 2015) are inseparable from current health inequities and discrimination experienced by many Indigenous peoples (Adelson, 2005; Bingham, Leo, Zhang, Montaner, & Shannon, 2014; Reading & Wien, 2009). Additionally, many Indigenous persons in Canada continue to experience barriers to economic and employment opportunities due to colonialism and systemic racism (Reading & Wien, 2009). As such, Indigenous trans sex workers may face increased levels and severity of violence due to racism, economic discrimination, and gendered power inequalities which are intersecting social-structural vulnerabilities (Bourgois, Prince, & Moss, 2004; de Vries, 2015; Meyer, 2012; Saffin, 2011).

Legal & Policy Implications

Due to the stigmatized and criminalized character of buying and selling sex in Canada and elsewhere, sex workers routinely face violence due to being conceived of as deserving of criminal punishments and violence (Shannon, et al., 2015; World Health Organization, 2005, 2012). Moreover, it is understood that criminalization increases sex workers’ vulnerability to violence and HIV infection (Bhattacharjya, et al., 2015; Shannon, et al., 2015). For example, sex workers who face violence are less able to engage in HIV prevention, such as condom-negotiation with clients (Deering et al., 2013; Shannon et al., 2009; World Health Organization, 2005). As the findings illustrate, Canadian sex work laws heighten trans sex workers’ vulnerability to client violence because they have to rush gender disclosure with clients. Indigenous trans sex workers may be more vulnerable to the harms of criminalization as evidenced by the vast overrepresentation of Indigenous persons in Canadian jails and prisons (The Correctional Investigator, 2014). In contrast, the decriminalization of sex work in New Zealand has improved sex worker’s working conditions and the relationships between sex workers and police (Abel, 2014). Thus, this international work and our findings support the decriminalization of sex work as a necessary tool to promote trans sex worker’s occupational safety and health.

It is imperative that structural interventions that address transphobia and colonialism are embedded within social structures (e.g., police) to improve the health and economic security of trans sex workers. Interventions and policies that remove barriers to economic opportunities and that support transition-related healthcare for those interested in transition need to be implemented and evaluated. For example, in 2012 Argentina introduced a Gender Identity Law that recommends universal coverage for transition-related healthcare and allows for changes to gender, image, or birth name on their identity card and birth certificates without psychiatric evaluation (Socías, Marshall, Arístegui, Zalazar, et al., 2014). Broader anti-stigma education programs and policies (e.g., gender education in schools) are vital to reduce transphobic violence, and interventions in healthcare settings are required to address the serious structural and cultural competency issues for trans populations in accessing health services (e.g., substance use treatment) (Bauer et al., 2009; Lyons et al., 2015).

Limitations and Future Directions

It is important to acknowledge the heterogeneity of trans persons and to note the study sample cannot be assumed to represent all trans and gender diverse sex workers, and policy changes, such as the decriminalization of sex work, may produce different results in Canada than in other settings. Very little is known about the experiences of two-spirit sex workers; however, including two-spirit participants in this study may have served to overshadow their unique experiences, particularly concerning Indigenous ancestry. Indigenous persons are overrepresented in the local environment due to colonialism and the displacement of Indigenous people in Canada (Hunt, 2013). Thus, future research would benefit from two-spirit specific research conducted by Indigenous peoples and/or in accordance with Indigenous research methods and ethics. Additionally, while a participatory analysis approach enriched and validated the data analysis, involving more than two research assistants in future research may help to offset any potential bias. Lastly, the data used in this analysis are based on self-report and may be susceptible to response biases, which may include an underreporting of violence.

Conclusion

This study offers insights into how the contexts of transphobia and criminalization of sex work shaped experiences of violence among trans sex workers by perpetuating gender-based violence and strained relationships with police. The findings illustrate that the decriminalization of sex work is necessary to improve the workplace health and safety of trans sex workers. In addition, culturally-based interventions and policy reforms (Hunt, 2013; Rowan et al., 2014) tailored to the unique needs of trans sex workers are required, including those specific to violence and sexual assault prevention focused on perpetrator interventions.

Acknowledgments

We thank all those who contributed their time and expertise to this project, particularly participants, research assistants, community advisory board members, and partner agencies. We wish to acknowledge Chrissy Taylor, Solanna Anderson, Elena Argento, Krista Butler, Peter Vann, Sarah Allan, and Jill Chettiar for their research and administrative support. A version of this paper was presented at Canadian Association for HIV Research Conference, April 2013, Vancouver, BC.

Funding

This research was supported by operating grants from the US National Institutes of Health (R01DA033147). TL, AK, and WS are supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. KS is supported by a Canada Research Chair in Global Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS and Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research.

Biographies

Tara Lyons, PhD, is a Research Scientist with the British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS.

Andrea Krüsi, PhD, is a postdoctoral fellow with the School of Population and Public Health at the University of British Columbia and the BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Leslie Pierre works at Providing Alternatives, Counselling & Education (PACE) Society in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Thomas Kerr, PhD, is the co-director of the Urban Health Research Initiative at the BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS and a Professor in the Department of Medicine at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Will Small, PhD, is an Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Health Sciences at Simon Fraser University and a Research Scientist with the BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Kate Shannon, PhD, MPH, is the director of Gender and Sexual Health Initiative at the BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS and Canada Research Chair in Global Sexual Health & HIV/AIDS at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Footnotes

1

Two-spirit is a dynamic concept that sits outside of binary understandings of sex and gender. The term was adopted in 1990 at a meeting of Indigenous peoples and it is used to describe an Indigenous person who has feminine and masculine spirits (Fieland, Walters, & Simoni, 2007). Two-spirit is also used by some indigenous people to describe their sexual orientation as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or queer (Ristock, Zoccole, & Passante, 2010).

2

First Nations and Métis are two of the three officially recognized Aboriginal groups in Canada (Bell, 2014). There were no participants of Inuit ancestry, the third recognized group, in our study.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abel GM. A decade of decriminalization: Sex work ‘down under’ but not underground. Criminology and Criminal Justice. 2014;14(5):580–592. [Google Scholar]
  2. Adelson N. The embodiment of inequity: Health disparities in Aboriginal Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 2005;96(Supplement 2):S45–S61. doi: 10.1007/BF03403702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Amnesty International. No more stolen sisters: The need for a comprehensive response to discrimination and violence against indigenous women in canada. London, UK: Amnesty International Publications; 2009. Retrieved from http://www.amnesty.ca/research/reports/no-more-stolen-sisters-the-need-for-a-comprehensive-response-to-discrimination-and- [Google Scholar]
  4. Bauer GR, Hammond R, Travers R, Kaay M, Hohenadel KM, Boyce M. “I don’t think this is theoretical; this is our lives”: How erasure impacts health care for transgender people. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care. 2009;20(5):348–361. doi: 10.1016/j.jana.2009.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beattie TS, Bhattacharjee P, Ramesh B, Gurnani V, Anthony J, Isac S, Bradley J. Violence against female sex workers in Karnataka state, south India: Impact on health, and reductions in violence following an intervention program. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(1):476. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bell C. R v. Daniels: Issues of jurisdiction, identity, and practical utility. Aboriginal Policy Studies. 2014;3(3):132–149. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bettcher TM. Evil deceivers and make-believers: On transphobic violence and the politics of illusion. Hypatia. 2007;22(3):43–65. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bhattacharjya M, Fulu E, Murthy L, Saraswathi Seshu M, Cabassi J, Vallejo-Mestres M. The right(s) evidence – sex work, violence and HIV in asia: A multi-country qualitative study. Bangkok: United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), and Asia Pacific Network of Sex Workers (CASAM); 2015. Retrieved from http://asiapacific.unfpa.org/sites/asiapacific/files/pub-pdf/Rights-Evidence-Report-2015-final_0.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bingham B, Leo D, Zhang R, Montaner J, Shannon K. Generational sex work and HIV risk among indigenous women in a street-based urban Canadian setting. Culture, health & sexuality. 2014;16(4):440–452. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2014.888480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bockting WO, Miner MH, Swinburne Romine RE, Hamilton A, Coleman E. Stigma, mental health, and resilience in an online sample of the US transgender population. American Journal of Public Health. 2013;103(5):943–951. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bourdieu P. Structures, habitus, power: Basis for a theory of symbolic power. In: Dirks NB, Eley G, Ortner SB, editors. Culture/power/history: A reader in contemporary social theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1994. pp. 155–199. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bourdieu P. In: Pascalian meditations. Nice R, translator. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bourgois P, Prince B, Moss A. The everyday violence of hepatitis C among young women who inject drugs in San Francisco. Human organization. 2004;63(3):253–264. doi: 10.17730/humo.63.3.h1phxbhrb7m4mlv0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cohan D, Lutnick A, Davidson P, Cloniger C, Herlyn A, Breyer J, Klausner J. Sex worker health: San Francisco style. Sexually transmitted infections. 2006;82(5):418–422. doi: 10.1136/sti.2006.020628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. de Vries KM. Transgender people of color at the center: Conceptualizing a new intersectional model. Ethnicities. 2015;15(1):3–27. [Google Scholar]
  16. DeCuir-Gunby JT, Marshall PL, McCulloch AW. Developing and using a codebook for the analysis of interview data: An example from a professional development research project. Field Methods. 2011;23(2):136–155. [Google Scholar]
  17. Deering KN, Amin A, Shoveller J, Nesbitt A, Garcia-Moreno C, Duff P, Shannon K. A systematic review of the correlates of violence against sex workers. American Journal of Public Health. 2014;104(5):e42–e54. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Deering KN, Lyons T, Feng CX, Nosyk B, Strathdee SA, Montaner JS, Shannon K. Client demands for unsafe sex: The socioeconomic risk environment for HIV among street and off-street sex workers. Journal Of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (1999) 2013;63(4):522–531. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182968d39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Farmer PE, Nizeye B, Stulac S, Keshavjee S. Structural violence and clinical medicine. PLoS Med. 2006;3(10):e449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.003044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fieland K, Walters K, Simoni J. Determinants of health among two-spirit American Indians and Alaska Natives. In: Meyer I, Northridge M, editors. The health of sexual minorities. New York: Springer; 2007. pp. 268–300. [Google Scholar]
  21. Fortin R, Jackson SF, Maher J, Moravac C. I was here: Young mothers who have experienced homelessness use photovoice and participatory qualitative analysis to demonstrate strengths and assets. Global Health Promotion. 2014;22(1):8–20. doi: 10.1177/1757975914528960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Galtung J. Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research. 1969;6(3):167–191. [Google Scholar]
  23. Government of Canada. Statutes of Canada 2014: Protection of communities and exploited persons act. Ottawa, ON: Government of Canada; Nov 6, 2014. Second session, forty-first parliament, 62–63 Elizabeth II, 2013–2014. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hunt S. Decolonizing sex work: Developing an intersectional indigenous approach. In: van der Meulen E, Durisin EM, Love V, editors. Selling sex: Experience, advocacy, and research on sex work in Canada. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press; 2013. pp. 82–100. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hwahng SJ, Nuttbrock L. Sex workers, fem queens, and cross-dressers: Differential marginalizations and HIV vulnerabilities among three ethnocultural male-to-female transgender communities in New York City. Sexuality Research and Social Policy. 2007;4(4):36–59. doi: 10.1525/srsp.2007.4.4.36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Infante C, Sosa-Rubi SG, Cuadra SM. Sex work in Mexico: Vulnerability of male, travesti, transgender and transsexual sex workers. Culture, health & sexuality. 2009;11(2):125–137. doi: 10.1080/13691050802431314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Johnson JR. Cisgender privilege, intersectionality, and the criminalization of cece mcdonald: Why intercultural communication needs transgender studies. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication. 2013;6(2):135–144. [Google Scholar]
  28. Jürgens R, Csete J, Amon JJ, Baral S, Beyrer C. People who use drugs, HIV, and human rights. The Lancet. 2010;376(9739):475–485. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60830-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Krüsi A, Pacey K, Bird L, Taylor C, Chettiar J, Allan S, Shannon K. Criminalisation of clients: Reproducing vulnerabilities for violence and poor health among street-based sex workers in canada - qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2014;4(6) doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kurtz SP, Surratt HL, Inciardi JA, Kiley MC. Sex work and “date” violence. Violence Against Women. 2004;10(4):357–385. [Google Scholar]
  31. Landolt M, Bartholomew K, Saffrey C, Oram D, Perlman D. Gender nonconformity, childhood rejection, and adult attachment: A study of gay men. Archives of sexual behavior. 2004;33(2):117–128. doi: 10.1023/b:aseb.0000014326.64934.50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Link BG, Phelan JC. Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology. 2001;27:363–385. [Google Scholar]
  33. Logie CH, James L, Tharao W, Loutfy MR. “We don’t exist”: A qualitative study of marginalization experienced by HIV-positive lesbian, bisexual, queer and transgender women in Toronto, Canada. Journal of the International AIDS Society. 2012;15(2):17392. doi: 10.7448/IAS.15.2.17392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lombardi EL, Wilchins RA, Priesing D, Malouf D. Gender violence: Transgender experiences with violence and discrimination. Journal of Homosexuality. 2001;42(1):89–101. doi: 10.1300/j082v42n01_05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lowman J. Violence and the outlaw status of (street) prostitution in canada. Violence Against Women. 2000;6(9):987–1011. [Google Scholar]
  36. Lyons T, Shannon K, Pierre L, Small W, Krüsi A, Kerr T. A qualitative study of transgender individuals’ experiences in residential addiction treatment settings: Stigma and inclusivity. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy. 2015;10(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13011-015-0015-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Marksamer J. And by the way, do you know he thinks he’s a girl? The failures of law, policy and legal representation for transgender youth in juvenile delinquency courts. Sexuality Research and Social Policy. 2008;5(1):72–92. [Google Scholar]
  38. Meyer D. An intersectional analysis of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people’s evaluations of anti-queer violence. Gender & Society. 2012;26(6):849–873. [Google Scholar]
  39. Mogul JL, Ritchie AJ, Whitlock K. Queer (in) justice: The criminalization of LGBT people in the united states. Boston: Beacon Press; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  40. Namaste VK. Invisible lives: The erasure of transsexual and transgendered people. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  41. Nemoto T, Bodeker B, Iwamoto M. Social support, exposure to violence and transphobia, and correlates of depression among male-to-female transgender women with a history of sex work. American Journal of Public Health. 2011;101(10):1980–1988. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.197285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Nemoto T, Operario D, Keatley J, Villegas D. Social context of HIV risk behaviours among male-to-female transgenders of colour. AIDS Care. 2004;16(6):724–735. doi: 10.1080/09540120413331269567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Oppal WT. Forsaken: The report of the missing women commission of inquiry. Vancouver, BC: 2012. Retrieved from http://www.missingwomeninquiry.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Forsaken-Vol-1-web-RGB.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  44. Perry B, Dyck DR. “I don’t know where it is safe”: Trans women’s experiences of violence. Critical Criminology. 2014;22(1):49–63. [Google Scholar]
  45. Poteat T, Wirtz AL, Radix A, Borquez A, Silva-Santisteban A, Deutsch MB, Operario D. HIV risk and preventive interventions in transgender women sex workers. The Lancet. 2015;385(9964):274–286. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60833-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Reading CL, Wien F. Health inequalities and the social determinants of aboriginal peoples’ health. National Collaborating Centre for Aboriginal Health Prince George, BC; 2009. Retrieved from http://ahrnets.ca/files/2011/02/NCCAH-Loppie-Wien_Report.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  47. Reisner SL, Mimiaga MJ, Bland S, Mayer KH, Perkovich B, Safren SA. HIV risk and social networks among male-to-female transgender sex workers in Boston, Massachusetts. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care. 2009;20(5):373–386. doi: 10.1016/j.jana.2009.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Rhodes T, Simic M, Baros S, Platt L, Zikic B. Police violence and sexual risk among female and transvestite sex workers in serbia: Qualitative study. BMJ: British Medical Journal. 2008;337 doi: 10.1136/bmj.a811. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Rhodes T, Singer M, Bourgois P, Friedman SR, Strathdee SA. The social structural production of HIV risk among injecting drug users. Social Science & Medicine. 2005;61(5):1026–1044. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Ristock J, Zoccole A, Passante L. Aboriginal two-spirit and LGBTQ migration, mobility and health research project: Final report. Winnipeg, MB: University of Manitoba; 2010. Retrieved from http://www.2spirits.com/PDFolder/MMHReport.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  51. Roche K, Keith C. How stigma affects healthcare access for transgender sex workers. British Journal of Nursing. 2014;23(21):1147–1152. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2014.23.21.1147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Ross BL. Outdoor brothel culture: The un/making of a transsexual stroll in Vancouver’s west end, 1975–1984. Journal of Historical Sociology. 2012;25(1):126–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6443.2011.01411.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Rowan M, Poole N, Shea B, Gone JP, Mykota D, Farag M, Dell C. Cultural interventions to treat addictions in indigenous populations: Findings from a scoping study. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy. 2014;9(1):34. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-9-34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Saffin LA. Identities under seige: Violence against transpersons of color. In: Stanely EA, Smith N, editors. Captive genders: Trans embodiment and the prison industrical complex. Oakland, CA: AK Press; 2011. pp. 141–162. [Google Scholar]
  55. Sampson L. The obscenities of this country: Canada v. Bedford and the reform of Canadian prostitution laws. Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy. 2014;22:137–172. [Google Scholar]
  56. Sausa L, Keatley J, Operario D. Perceived risks and benefits of sex work among transgender women of color in San Francisco. Archives of sexual behavior. 2007;36(6):768–777. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9210-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Scheper-Hughes N. Small wars and invisible genocides. Social Science & Medicine. 1996;43(5):889–900. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(96)00152-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Schilt K, Westbrook L. Doing gender, doing heteronormativity: “Gender normals,” transgender people, and the social maintenance of heterosexuality. Gender & Society. 2009;23(4):440–464. [Google Scholar]
  59. Serano J. Whipping girl: A transsexual woman on sexism and the scapegoating of femininity. Berkeley, CA: Seal Press; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  60. Sevelius J. Gender affirmation: A framework for conceptualizing risk behavior among transgender women of color. Sex Roles. 2013;68(11–12):675–689. doi: 10.1007/s11199-012-0216-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Shannon K, Bright V, Allinott S, Alexson D, Gibson K, Tyndall MW. Community-based HIV prevention research among substance-using women in survival sex work: The Maka project partnership. Harm Reduction Journal. 2007;4(1):20. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-4-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Shannon K, Kerr T, Allinott S, Chettiar J, Shoveller J, Tyndall MW. Social and structural violence and power relations in mitigating HIV risk of drug-using women in survival sex work. Social Science & Medicine. 2008;66(4):911–921. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Shannon K, Strathdee SA, Goldenberg SM, Duff P, Mwangi P, Rusakova M, Boily MC. Global epidemiology of HIV among female sex workers: Influence of structural determinants. The Lancet. 2015;385(9962):55–71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60931-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Shannon K, Strathdee SA, Shoveller J, Rusch M, Kerr T, Tyndall MW. Structural and environmental barriers to condom use negotiation with clients among female sex workers: Implications for HIV-prevention strategies and policy. American Journal of Public Health. 2009;99(4):659–665. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.129858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Simić M, Rhodes T. Violence, dignity and HIV vulnerability: Street sex work in serbia. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2009;31(1):1–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01112.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Simpson LR. Anticolonial strategies for the recovery and maintenance of indigenous knowledge. The American Indian Quarterly. 2004;28(3):373–384. [Google Scholar]
  67. Socías ME, Marshall BD, Arístegui I, Romero M, Cahn P, Kerr T, Sued O. Factors associated with healthcare avoidance among transgender women in Argentina. International journal for equity in health. 2014;13(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12939-014-0081-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Socías ME, Marshall BD, Arístegui I, Zalazar V, Romero M, Sued O, Kerr T. Towards full citizenship: Correlates of engagement with the gender identity law among transwomen in Argentina. Plos One. 2014;9(8):e105402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Stotzer RL. Violence against transgender people: A review of united states data. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2009;14(3):170–179. [Google Scholar]
  70. Strathdee SA, Patrick DM, Currie SL, Cornelisse PG, Rekart ML, Montaner JS, O’Shaughnessy MV. Needle exchange is not enough: Lessons from the Vancouver injecting drug use study. AIDS. 1997;11:1291–1304. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199708000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. The Correctional Investigator. Annual report of the office of the correctional investigator 2013–2014. Ottawa, ON: Government of Canada; 2014. Retrieved from http://www.oci-bec.gc.ca/cnt/rpt/annrpt/annrpt20132014-eng.aspx. [Google Scholar]
  72. Thomas DR. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation. 2006;27(2):237–246. [Google Scholar]
  73. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Honouring the truth, reconciling for the future: Summary of the final report of the truth and reconciliation commission of canada. Winnipeg, MB: 2015. Retrieved from http://www.trc.ca/websites/trcinstitution/File/2015/Findings/Exec_Summary_2015_05_31_web_o.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  74. Tyndall M, Currie S, Spittal P, Li K, Wood E, O’Shaughnessy MV, Schechter MT. Intensive injection cocaine use as the primary risk factor in the Vancouver HIV-1 epidemic. AIDS. 2003;17(6):887–893. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200304110-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Wood E, Stoltz JA, Montaner J, Kerr T. Evaluating methamphetamine use and risks of injection initiation among street youth: The ARYS study. Harm Reduction Journal. 2006;3(1):18. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-3-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. World Health Organization. Violence against sex workers and HIV prevention. Violence against women and HIV/AIDS: Critical intersections. 2005 Retrieved from http://www.who.int/gender/documents/sexworkers.pdf.
  77. World Health Organization. Prevention and treatment of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections for sex workers in low- and middle-income countries: Recommendations for a public health approach. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2012. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/guidelines/sex_worker/en/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Xavier J, Bradford J, Hendricks M, Safford L, McKee R, Martin E, Honnold JA. Transgender health care access in virginia: A qualitative study. International Journal of Transgenderism. 2013;14(1):3–17. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES