Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Heart logoLink to Heart
. 1997 Sep;78(3):262–267. doi: 10.1136/hrt.78.3.262

Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in patients with permanent pacemakers.

T M Lee 1, S F Su 1, K L Chien 1, Y J Lin 1, W J Chen 1, M F Chen 1, C S Liau 1, Y T Lee 1
PMCID: PMC484928  PMID: 9391288

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relations between left atrial appendage function, spontaneous echo contrast, and thromboembolism in patients with different modes of permanent pacemakers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 88 patients with pacemaker implantation and 25 healthy controls in sinus rhythm had transoesophageal echocardiographic examination of the left atrial appendage. Left atrial size, appendage area, peak filling and emptying velocities of the atrial appendage, and the presence or absence of spontaneous echo contrast and thromboembolism were determined. The results in 63 patients with ventricular pacing (group 1, subdivided into subgroup 1A: 42 patients with sinus rhythm, and subgroup 1B: 21 patients with atrial fibrillation) were compared with those in 25 patients with synchronous pacing (group 2), and 25 normal control subjects (group 3). RESULTS: Patients with ventricular pacing had two distinct appendage flow patterns: well defined biphasic filling and emptying waves in subgroup 1A, and irregular very low filling and emptying waves in subgroup 1B. The ejection fraction of the left atrial appendage in subgroup 1A was significantly better than that in subgroup 1B (mean (SD) 40.6 (12.0)% v 7.6 (5.0)%, P < 0.0001). The spontaneous echo contrast was observed in 90% of subgroup 1B patients but in only 19% in subgroup 1A (P < 0.05) and was not found in groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.0001). There was a trend for increased prevalence of spontaneous echo contrast in subgroup 1A v group 2 (P = 0.053). Thrombi were detected in two cases, and cardiogenic embolism occurred in one case in subgroup 1B. All patients with spontaneous echo contrast had ventricular pacing. Multivariate analysis showed that atrial fibrillation was associated with occurrence of spontaneous echo contrast in patients with ventricular pacing (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The left atrial appendage ejection fraction was lower with ventricular pacing than with synchronous pacing. With ventricular pacing there was a trend towards increased prevalence of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in patients in sinus rhythm, and a significantly increased prevalence in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Full text

PDF
262

Images in this article

263Image
on p.263
263Image
on p.263
264Image
on p.264
264Image
on p.264

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Asanuma T., Tanabe K., Yoshitomi H., Shimizu H., Murakami Y., Sano K., Shimada T., Morioka S. Left atrial appendage function in patients with single-chamber ventricular pacing. Am J Cardiol. 1995 Oct 15;76(11):840–842. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80241-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bathen J., Sparr S., Rokseth R. Embolism in sinoatrial disease. Acta Med Scand. 1978;203(1-2):7–11. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1978.tb14823.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Black I. W., Hopkins A. P., Lee L. C., Walsh W. F. Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast: a clinical and echocardiographic analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Aug;18(2):398–404. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(91)90592-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Castello R., Pearson A. C., Labovitz A. J. Prevalence and clinical implications of atrial spontaneous contrast in patients undergoing transesophageal echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 1990 May 1;65(16):1149–1153. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90330-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chimowitz M. I., DeGeorgia M. A., Poole R. M., Hepner A., Armstrong W. M. Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast is highly associated with previous stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation or mitral stenosis. Stroke. 1993 Jul;24(7):1015–1019. doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.7.1015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cormier B., Vahanian A., Iung B., Porte J. M., Dadez E., Lazarus A., Starkman C., Acar J. Influence of percutaneous mitral commissurotomy on left atrial spontaneous contrast of mitral stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 1993 Apr 1;71(10):842–847. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90834-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Daniel W. G., Nellessen U., Schröder E., Nonnast-Daniel B., Bednarski P., Nikutta P., Lichtlen P. R. Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in mitral valve disease: an indicator for an increased thromboembolic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Jun;11(6):1204–1211. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)90283-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Erbel R., Stern H., Ehrenthal W., Schreiner G., Treese N., Krämer G., Thelen M., Schweizer P., Meyer J. Detection of spontaneous echocardiographic contrast within the left atrium by transesophageal echocardiography: spontaneous echocardiographic contrast. Clin Cardiol. 1986 Jun;9(6):245–252. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960090603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fatkin D., Kelly R. P., Feneley M. P. Relations between left atrial appendage blood flow velocity, spontaneous echocardiographic contrast and thromboembolic risk in vivo. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Mar 15;23(4):961–969. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90644-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jue J., Winslow T., Fazio G., Redberg R. F., Foster E., Schiller N. B. Pulsed Doppler characterization of left atrial appendage flow. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1993 May-Jun;6(3 Pt 1):237–244. doi: 10.1016/s0894-7317(14)80059-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kubica J., Stolarczyk L., Krzyminska E., Krasowski R., Raczak G., Lubiński A., Stanke A., Swiatecka G. Left atrial size and wall motion in patients with permanent ventricular and atrial pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990 Dec;13(12 Pt 2):1737–1741. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1990.tb06882.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Langenfeld H., Grimm W., Maisch B., Kochsiek K. Atrial fibrillation and embolic complications in paced patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1988 Nov;11(11 Pt 2):1667–1672. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1988.tb06292.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Leclercq C., Gras D., Le Helloco A., Nicol L., Mabo P., Daubert C. Hemodynamic importance of preserving the normal sequence of ventricular activation in permanent cardiac pacing. Am Heart J. 1995 Jun;129(6):1133–1141. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(95)90394-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mahony C., Sublett K. L., Harrison M. R. Resolution of spontaneous contrast with platelet disaggregatory therapy (trifluoperazine). Am J Cardiol. 1989 Apr 15;63(13):1009–1010. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90163-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mügge A., Kühn H., Nikutta P., Grote J., Lopez J. A., Daniel W. G. Assessment of left atrial appendage function by biplane transesophageal echocardiography in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation: identification of a subgroup of patients at increased embolic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Mar 1;23(3):599–607. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90743-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Porte J. M., Cormier B., Iung B., Dadez E., Starkman C., Nallet O., Michel P. L., Acar J., Vahanian A. Early assessment by transesophageal echocardiography of left atrial appendage function after percutaneous mitral commissurotomy. Am J Cardiol. 1996 Jan 1;77(1):72–76. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)89137-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Reimold S. C., Lamas G. A., Cantillon C. O., Antman E. M. Risk factors for the development of recurrent atrial fibrillation: role of pacing and clinical variables. Am Heart J. 1995 Jun;129(6):1127–1132. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(95)90393-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Santiago D., Warshofsky M., Li Mandri G., Di Tullio M., Coromilas J., Reiffel J., Homma S. Left atrial appendage function and thrombus formation in atrial fibrillation-flutter: a transesophageal echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Jul;24(1):159–164. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90557-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Santini M., Alexidou G., Ansalone G., Cacciatore G., Cini R., Turitto G. Relation of prognosis in sick sinus syndrome to age, conduction defects and modes of permanent cardiac pacing. Am J Cardiol. 1990 Mar 15;65(11):729–735. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)91379-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sigel B., Coelho J. C., Spigos D. G., Flanigan D. P., Schuler J. J., Kasprisin D. O., Nyhus L. M., Capek V. Ultrasonography of blood during stasis and coagulation. Invest Radiol. 1981 Jan-Feb;16(1):71–76. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198101000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sutton R., Kenny R. A. The natural history of sick sinus syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1986 Nov;9(6 Pt 2):1110–1114. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1986.tb06678.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Verhorst P. M., Kamp O., Visser C. A., Verheugt F. W. Left atrial appendage flow velocity assessment using transesophageal echocardiography in nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation and systemic embolism. Am J Cardiol. 1993 Jan 15;71(2):192–196. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90737-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. de Belder M. A., Lovat L. B., Tourikis L., Leech G., Camm A. Left atrial spontaneous contrast echoes--markers of thromboembolic risk in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 1993 Mar;14(3):326–335. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/14.3.326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heart are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES