Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most frequent and malignant brain tumor. Treatment includes chemotherapy with temozolomide concomitant with surgical resection and/or irradiation. However, a number of cases are resistant to temozolomide, as well as the human glioblastoma cell line U138-MG. We investigated doxazosin’s (an antihypertensive drug) activity against glioblastoma cells (C6 and U138-MG) and its neurotoxicity on primary astrocytes and organoptypic hippocampal cultures. For this study, the following methods were used: citotoxicity assays, flow cytometry, western-blotting and confocal microscopy. We showed that doxazosin induces cell death on C6 and U138-MG cells. We observed that doxazosin’s effects on the PI3K/Akt pathway were similar as LY294002 (PI3K specific inhibitor). In glioblastoma cells treated with doxasozin, Akt levels were greatly reduced. Upon examination of activities of proteins downstream of Akt we observed upregulation of GSK-3β and p53. This led to cell proliferation inhibition, cell death induction via caspase-3 activation and cell cycle arrest at G0/G1 phase in glioblastoma cells. We used in this study Lapatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, as a comparison with doxazosin because they present similar chemical structure. We also tested the neurocitotoxicity of doxazosin in primary astrocytes and organotypic cultures and observed that doxazosin induced cell death on a small percentage of non-tumor cells. Aggressiveness of glioblastoma tumors and dismal prognosis require development of new treatment agents. This includes less toxic drugs, more selective towards tumor cells, causing less damage to the patient. Therefore, our results confirm the potential of doxazosin as an attractive therapeutic antiglioma agent.
Introduction
Gliomas are malignant primary brain tumors with no effective cure. Diffuse high grade gliomas (glioblastoma) patients have a short life expectancy despite aggressive therapeutic approaches based on surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy [1].
Molecular mechanisms of glioblastoma multiform (GBM) resistance to therapy involve the PI3K/Akt pathway—which regulates cell proliferation, cell cycle, survival, apoptosis, chemotherapy resistance and tumorigenesis [2]. Transition from anaplasic astrocytoma to glioblastoma malignant evolution [3] and intrinsic radioresistance [4] are promoted by protein kinase B (Akt) activation, which is also a negative prognosis factor [5]. Glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) and p53, protein substrates downstream of the PI3K/Akt pathway, also regulate cellular sensitivity/resistance to cancer chemotherapy and are unregulated in glioblastoma multiform [6,7].
Doxazosin (2-{4-[(2,3-Dihydro-1,4-benzodioxin-2-yl)carbonyl]piperazin-1-yl}-6,7-dimethoxyquinazolin-4-amine) is a quinazoline compound and a selective α1-adrenoceptor antagonist widely used for treatment of high blood pressure and urinary retention related with benign prostatic hyperplasia [8]. Early studies showed doxazosin induced apoptosis in murine prostatic stromal and epithelial cells [9,10] and on urothelial cancer [11], pituitary adenoma [12], breast cancer [2] and human glioblastoma cells (U87-MG) [13]. Sakamoto et al. suggested that early administration of doxazosin may be useful in preventing clinical prostate tumor formation and supressing metastasis of human prostate cancer [14].
Many studies have focused on cytotoxic effects of doxazosin on cell death in tumor cells, but not in neural non-tumor cells. Moreover, chemotherapeutics used in glioma treatment have poor permeability through the blood brain barrier and short half-lives. Due to its physicochemical characteristics, doxazosin is able to permeate the blood-brain barrier [15] (BBB) and its relatively long half-life provides basis for once-daily dosing, which is a therapeutic advantage [16].
Here we show that doxazosin has low neurotoxicity and induces cell death and G0/G1 phase arrest on C6 and U138-MG glioblastoma cells. When compared with the tyrosine kianse inhibitor Lapatinib, doxazosin appears to be a more potent antiglioma agent. We demonstrated that doxazosin’s antitumoral effects are due to downregulation of Akt and upregulation of GSK-3β and p53, in addition to activation of caspase 3. We also observed that doxazosin’s effects on the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/AKT pathway were similar as LY294002 (PI3K specific inhibitor).
Materials and Methods
Chemicals and materials
Cell culture medium and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were obtained from Gibco-Invitrogen (Grand Island, NY, USA). Doxazosin was obtained from Sigma Chemical Co (St. Louis, MO, USA). All other reagents were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA) or Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). All chemicals and solvents used were of analytical or pharmaceutical grade.
Cell culture
C6 rat (passage number 20–25) and U138-MG human glioma cell lines were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, Mariland, Md., USA). C6 and U138-MG cells were grown and maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM, Gibco-Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 5% and 10% (v/v) FBS (Gibco-Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA), respectively, and containing 2.5 mg/mL of Fungizone® and 100 U/L of gentamicine (Shering do Brasil, São Paulo, SP, Brazil). Cells were kept at 37°C, in an atmosphere of 5% CO2.
Ethics statement
All animal procedures were approved by the local animal ethics comission (Comissão de Ética no Uso de Animais/Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul—CEUA/UFRGS, under project number 20.005) and follows national animal rights regulations (Law 11.794/2008), the National Institute of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH publication No. 80–23, revised 1996) and Directive 2010/63/EU. We further attest that all efforts were made to minimize the number of animals used and their suffering.
Primary astrocyte culture
Primary astrocyte culture from Wistar rats was prepared as previously described [17]. Newborn Wistar rats (1–2 days-old) were maintained in a ventilated room at constant temperature, in breeding cages with their mother, on a 12h light/dark cycle. The newborn rats were decapitated, their cerebral cortices were removed and mechanically dissociated in Ca²+ and Mg²+ free balanced salt solution, pH 7.4, containing (in mM): 137 NaCl; 5.36 KCl; 0.27 Na2HPO4; 1.1 KH2PO4 and 6.1 glucose. Cortices were cleaned of meninges and mechanically dissociated by sequential passage through a Pasteur pipette. After centrifugation at 1400 rpm for 5 min, the pellet was resuspended in DMEM (pH 7.6) supplemented with 8.39 mM HEPES, 23.8 mM NaHCO3, 0.1% amphotericin, 0.032% gentamicin and 10% Fetal Calf Serum (FCS). Cultures were maintained in DMEM containing 10% FCS in 5% CO2/95% air at 37°C, allowed to grow to confluence, and used at 15 days in vitro.
Organotypic hippocampal slice culture
Organotypic hippocampal slice cultures were prepared according to the method of Stoppini [18] with modifications [19]. Wistar rats (6–8 days-old) were maintained in a ventilated room at constant temperature, in breeding cages with their mother, on a 12h light/dark cycle. The rats were decapitated, their hippocampi were removed and 400μM thick slices were prepared using a Mcllwain tissue chopper in ice-cold Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS), pH 7.2. Slices were placed on MiIlicell® culture membranes and the inserts were transferred to a six-well culture plate. Each well contained 1mL of tissue culture medium consisting of Minimum Essential Media (MEM) with 25% of HBSS and 25% of horse serum supplemented with 36 mM glucose, 25 mM HEPES, 4 mM NaHCO3, 1% Fungizone® and 0,1 mg/mL gentamicine, pH 7,3. The cultures were kept in an incubator 37°C and 5% of CO2 for 14 days.
Culture treatments
C6 and U138-MG glioma cells were seeded in culture media and grown for 24 hours. Doxazosin was dissolved in 20% ethanol/milli-Q™ water (vehicle) and C6 cells were treated with concentrations ranging from 30 μM to 300 μM. U138-MG cells were treated with drug concentrations ranging from 5 μM to 75 μM. Primary astrocyte cultures and organotypic slice cultures were treated with doxazosin for 48 hours at 30–250 μM. Lapatinib was dissolved in DMSO and cells were treated with 500 nM.
MTT assay
C6 and U138-MG glioma cells were plated in 96-well plates at 10³ cells/well and grown for 24 hours. Following treatment, cells were incubated with 0,5 mg/mL MTT (3-(4,5-methylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) for 1 h. The solution was then removed from the precipitate and the formazan product in the cells was solubilized by adding DMSO. Absorbance was read by an ELISA plate reader (Biochrom Anthos Zenyth 200 Microplate Reader) at 490 nm.
LDH assay
Cell death was evaluated by measuring the activity of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH, E.C.1.1.1.27). After treatment, U138-MG and C6 cell culture medium was collected and LDH activity was determined by an enzymatic colorimetric reaction (Cytotoxity Detection Kit—LDH, Roche Applied Science). Absorbance was measured at 490 nm.
Sulforhodamine B assay
Sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay was used for cell density determination [20]. After treatment with doxazosin, cells were washed with Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) and fixed with PBS/FORMOL 4% for 15 minutes. Fixed cells were stained with SRB. Subsequently, wells were washed with deionized water to remove unbound stain. Culture plates were air dried and protein-bound SRB was solubilized in 1% SDS. Absorbance was measured by an ELISA plate reader (Biochrom Anthos Zenyth 200 Microplate Reader) at 515 nm.
Flow Cytometry
Cell death was analyzed by flow cytometry. For C6, U138-MG and primary astrocyte cultures, both floating and trypsinized adherent cells were collected. Organotypic hippocampal slices were dissociated in PBS containing 1% collagenase, 1% DNase, and 0.2% trypsine and filtered through a 40 μm membrane (Millipore). Annexin-V FITC/propidium iodide (PI) double stain kit was used, following the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA). Samples were incubated in binding buffer containing Annexin-V FITC and PI for 15 min in the dark at room temperature.
For cell cycle analysis, C6 and U138-MG cells were seeded in 6-well plates (3x104 cells/well). After treatments, cells were washed with PBS, trypsinized and counted. Cells were centrifuged at 400 x g for 5 min and resuspended (106 cells/mL) in PBS containing RNAse (100 μg/mL) and PI (5 μg/mL) for 15 min at room temperature.
For analysis of cleaved caspase 3, C6 and U138-MG cells were trypsinized and centrifuged at 400 x g for 5 min. Cells were resuspended in PBS containing 0,1% Triton X-100 and mouse anti-cleaved caspase 3 antibody (1:100; Cell Signaling), for 30 min at room temperature. Then, secondary antibody anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 (1:100, Invitrogen) was added and, after incubation for 30 min, fluorescence intensity was analyzed by flow cytometry.
Data acquisition was done by flow cytometry using a FACS Calibur cytometry system and Cell Quest software (BD Bioscience, Mountain View, CA, USA). Data obtained was analyzed with FCS Express 4 Software (De Novo Software, Los Angeles, CA, USA).
Western blotting
After treatments, cells were homogenized in lysis buffer (4% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 2 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris). Protein concentration was determined by the Lowry method. Proteins were resolved (75 μg per lane) on 10 or 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Hybond™ ECL™ nitrocellulose membrane, Amersham Biosciences™, Fryeburg, Germany) using a semi-dry transfer apparatus (Bio- Rad™, Trans-Blot SD, Hercules™, CA, USA). Membranes were incubated for 60 minutes at 4°C in blocking solution (Tris-buffered saline containing 5% powdered milk and 0.1% Tween-20, pH 7.4). and incubated overnight with specific antibodies. Primary antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology™, Beverly, MA, USA) against the following proteins were used: anti-p-AKTSer473 and anti-AKT (1:1000), anti-p-GSK-3βSer9 and anti-GSK-3β (1:1000), anti-p-p53Ser15 (1:1000), anti-β-actin (1:1000). Membranes were then incubated with horseradish peroxidase conjugated anti-rabbit antibody (1:1000; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ, USA). Chemiluminescence (ECL, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech™) was detected using X-ray films (Kodak X-Omat™, Rochester, NY, USA).
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as means±SEM. All results are representative of at least 4 independent experiments. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to the means to determine statistical differences between experimental groups. Post hoc comparisons were performed by Tukey test. Differences between mean values were considered significant when p<0.05.
Results
Evaluation of doxazosin toxicity on non tumoral tissue/cells
One of the problems of current cancer therapy is lack of specificity and selectivity of certain drugs used for tumor treatment [21]. In order to evaluate the drug toxicity on non-tumoral neural tissue, we exposed primary astrocyte cultures and organotypic hippocampal slice cultures to doxazosin for 48 hours.
Initially, we tested a concentration curve (30–250 μM) of doxazosin, with intermediate concentrations obtained from the literature [22]. In primary astrocyte culture (Fig 1 and S1 Table), 250 μM doxazosin increased total cell death (15.62%±2.674), while at concentrations of 75 and 180 μM was not observed significant cell death. Lapatinib (500 nM) caused total cell death of 27.61%±1.218, inducing necrosis in 20.07%±1.261. The toxicity on non-tumoral astrocytic cells by Lapatinib was higher than doxazosin 250 μM.
In organotypic cultures (Fig 1 and S1 Table), doxazosin caused cell death of 10.82%±1.232 at 180 μM and 18.27%±1.346 at 250 μM. Lapatinib (500 nM) caused cell death in 26.86%±1.885 of cells, inducing necrosis in 17.28%±6.134 of cells. In non-tumoral neural tissue, Lapatinib cell death induction also was higher than doxazosin.
In relation to the distribution and type of cell death observed on organotypic cultures, doxazosin induced apoptosis and necrosis at 250 μM mostly on CA1 region (S1 Fig). Lapatinib induced apoptosis and necrosis on CA1 and mostly on the dentate gyrus (DG) regions.
Antiglioma activity of doxazosin
C6 and U138-MG cells were treated with a concentration curve of doxazosin for 48 hours, based on concentrations used for non-tumor cells. In C6 cells, we observed a significant reduction of cell viability with treatments from 150 μM to 300 μM of doxazosin for 48 h (Fig 2). Doxazosin increased LDH activity in the incubation medium of C6 cells when treated with 150 and 180 μM (Fig 2). In agreement with these results, cell density of C6 cells decreased to approximately 25% when treated with doxazosin 150 and 180 μM for 48 h (Fig 2).
For U138-MG cells, after 48 hours of treatment we observed a significant reduction on the percentage of viable cells in cultures treated with 75 μM of doxazosin (Fig 2). LDH activity increased in the incubation medium of U138-MG culture cells when treated with 50 and 75 μM doxazosin (Fig 2). Also at these concentrations, doxazosin decreased cell density to approximately 50% (Fig 2), supporting the results above. All together, these cytotoxicity assays suggest an antiglioma effect of doxazosin in C6 and U138-MG cell lines.
Doxazosin induced cell death by necrosis and caspase-dependent apoptosis in human and rat glioblastoma cell lines
Doxazosin induced necrosis and apoptosis in C6 cells after 48 h of treatment (Fig 3, S2 Table and S2 Fig). At concentration of 100 μM, the drug caused 36.68%±5.045 of cell death and this toxic effect increased with higher drug concentrations, reaching 69.71%±2.503 at 180 μM. At 180 μM, doxazosin caused early apoptosis in approximately 14.89%±1.581 of cells and late apoptosis in approximately 26.20%±4.860. Necrosis occurred in 28.62%±6.373. While Lapatinib caused cell death in 47.96%±0.975 of C6 cells after 48 h, triggering necrosis in 20.56%±1.591 and late apoptosis in 22.01%±1.548 of cells. Lapatinib caused cell death on C6 cells to a less extent than doxazosin.
In U138-MG cells, doxazosin induced cell death in 35.9%±3.356 of cells at 50 μM and 52.69%±5.709 at 75 μM after 48 h (Fig 3 and S2 Table). Doxazosin 75 μM triggered mostly late apoptosis (41.86%±5.589) in U138-MG cells. Lapatinib caused cell death in 41.44%±0.466 of cells, and triggered mostly necrosis (36.13%±1.733) (Fig 3 and S2 Table).
After 48 h of treatment, doxazosin increased activation of caspase 3 in C6 and U138-MG (Fig 4) cell lines and this was proportional to increase in drug concentration. These results of cleaved caspase-3 levels confirm induction of apoptosis by doxazosin.
Doxazosin caused G0/G1 phase arrest on C6 and U138-MG glioblastomas
We next sought to analyze doxazosin’s effect on cell cycle progression and mitotic index. As shown in Fig 5, after 48 h of treatment of C6 cells, doxazosin caused cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase at concentrations of 100 and 180 μM compared to control. We analyzed the mitotic index of C6 cells in order to assess proliferation (Fig 5). Doxazosin decreased the mitotic index in the concentrations of 100, 150 and 180 μM after 48h of treatment, in agreement with cell cycle results.
In U138-MG cells, doxazosin caused cell cycle arrest in G0/G1 phase at concentrations of 30 and 75 μM and decreased mitotic index in the concentrations of 50 and 75 μM after 48 h of treatment in U138-MG cells (Fig 5).
PI3K/Akt pathway: a possible doxazosin target
Next, we analyzed activation of proteins involved with apoptosis, cell cycle and glioma malignancy in rat and human glioblastoma cells. The phosphorylation levels of p-AKTSer473, p-GSK-3βSer9 and p-p53Ser15 were analyzed for their role in cell survival, proliferation and apoptosis regulation. Doxazosin was added for 24 and 48 h. As shown in Fig 6, p-AktSer473 levels decreased at 150 and 180 μM doxazosin in C6 cells after 48 h.
Additionally, we evaluated whether Akt downstream target GSK-3β was affected. As shown in Fig 6, the treatment of C6 cells with doxazosin, 150 and 180 μM, decreased p-GSK-3βSer9 levels after 48 h. We also observed an increase of phosphorylation levels of p-p53Ser15 after 48 h of treatment with doxazosin 180 μM in C6 cells (Fig 6).
In U138-MG cells, treatment with doxazosin during 24 h and 48 h at concentrations of 30, 50 and 75 μM, decreased p-AktSer473 levels (Fig 6). By other hand, after 24 h only the treatments at concentrations of 50 and 75 μM of doxazosin were able to decrease the p-GSK-3βSer9 levels, while after 48 h this decrease was maintained and we also observed a decrease at 30 μM of doxazosin treatment (Fig 6). Regarding to the effect of doxazosin on the p53 protein in U138-MG cells, it was observed an increase in p-p53Ser15 at the concentrations of 30, 50 and 75 μM (Fig 6). We analyzed immunocontent of these same phosphorylated proteins at earlier times and did not observe any differences (data not shown).
In order to analyze whether the PI3K signaling pathway by Akt activation and GSK-3β inactivation was involved in the effect of doxazosin, we carried out this experiment using LY294002, a specific inhibitor of PI3K [23]. Activated PI3K phosphorylates its downstream target Akt. Phosphorylated Akt directly affects GSK-3β by phosphorylating it at Ser9 and thus inhibiting its activity. LY294002 induced C6 and U138-MG cell death in 48 h and inhibited GSK-3βSer9 phosphorylation in the same manner as doxazosin (Fig 6). This result indicates a possible effect of doxazosin on the PI3K/Akt pathway on glioma cells.
Discussion
Current anticancer drugs have limitations by presenting cytotoxicity, low specificity and the prolonged use may result in lethal damage to healthy cells. Therefore, chemotherapeutic treatment of tumors in the central nervous system is associated with severe systemic side effects and therefore affecting patients quality of life [24]. Glioblastoma is a radio- and chemo-resistant cancer. This makes it necessary to increase chemotherapy dosage or add more drugs for treatment, which increases toxicity on non-tumor cells. Tumor surgical resection, in the case of glioblastomas, might compromise vital brain areas due to the cancer’s aggressive and infiltrative characteristics [24].
Temozolomide (TMZ) is considered the standard therapy for treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. However TMZ must be administered at high doses systemically in order to achieve therapeutic levels in the brain, mainly due to its low half-life (about 1.8 h in plasma) [25]. It has been approved by the FDA in the USA for the treatment of GBM, showing a median survival of just 5.8 months [26]. Furthermore, prolonged systemic administration is associated with side effects such as nausea, vomiting, fatigue and headache.
Additionally, the central nervous system has another limitation regarding treatment: nerve tissue has a low rate of cell division and loss of non-tumor cells greatly affects the well-being of patients. For these reasons, the search for new therapeutic strategies and chemotherapeutics is necessary to improve effectiveness of glioma treatment, while preserving the quality of life of patients. Doxazosin is a FDA approved drug in the USA for treatment of hypertension and symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia, with mild side effects, like dizziness and hypotension [22,27]. However, doxazosin toxicity on nervous non-tumor tissue has never been evaluated so far.
In astrocytes, doxazosin increased total cell death only at the high concentration of 250 μM when compared to control. In organotypic cultures, doxazosin caused cell death at 180 and 250 μM concentrations when compared to control. Although there was no statistical difference between the types of cell death, doxazosin showed a tendency towards induction of necrosis and late apoptosis. These results show that doxazosin triggers different cell responses depending on its concentration and the best range of concentrations for further tests are below 250 μM.
We also tested Lapatinib citotoxicity on primary astrocytes and organotypic cultures, and compared its antitumoral effect with doxazosin on C6 and U138-MG glioma cells. Lapatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which has a quinazolinic ring in its chemical structure. Compounds based on quinazoline scaffolds can target a range of kinases with varying degrees of selectivity [28]. Doxazosin also presents a quinazoline scaffold on its chemical structure. Lapatinib was used in this study as a comparison with doxazosin because they present similar chemical structure [29]. Reports show Lapatinib effective inhibition of human breast and prostate cancer cell lines, and in U87-MG and M059K glioblastoma cell lines [30]. Here we showed that Lapatinib 500 nM is more cytotoxic than doxazosin 250 μM on primary astrocytes and hippocampal organotypic cultures.
We observed that in hippocampal organotypic cultures doxazosin induced apoptosis on DG and CA1 cells, but necrosis was limited to CA1 area, possibly due to delayed cell death and DG’s capability of apoptosis induction for tissue remodeling purposes [31]. Lapatinib also induced apoptosis and necrosis on both regions, but necrosis was more pronounced in the DG region. CA1 neurons react differently after lesions than DG cells, mainly because they present more dendritic remodeling and present high abundance of NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptors, which could lead to glutamate excitotoxicity [32].
Several studies have demonstrated that doxazosin’s concentrations responsible for cell death induction vary depending on the origin of the cells, the type of cancer and even between different cell lines of the same type of tumor [22,33]. On prostate cancer cells, for example, maximum concentration of doxazosin used is 100 μM [22,34]. On the other hand, colon cancer SW-480 cells and bladder cancer HTB1 cells were less sensitive to this concentration of doxazosin [22]. HeLa cells showed high sensitivity to doxazosin, while HepG-2 and MCF-7 cells showed an IC50 of around 200 μM [35].
We observed that C6 and U138-MG cell lines had different vulnerability against doxazosin. Results showed that doxazosin induced apoptosis and necrosis on C6 cells and only apoptosis on U138-MG cells. When compared with Lapatinib, doxazosin showed to be more effective in inducing apoptotic cell death in both C6 and in U138-MG cells. Although it has been observed that treatment with TMZ induces a decrease in cell viability in various glioma lines, it is well described that U138-MG lineage is resistant to this treatment [36]. Our results showed that doxazosin was able to induce apoptosis in both cell types, C6 and U138-MG. Differences observed between cell lines on cytotoxicity assays and types of cell death could be due to: different species, varying doubling times or characteristics and mutations between cell lineages. C6 cells have a doubling time of approximately 25–30 hours [37], while U138-MG cells’ is 70 hours [38]. C6 cells proliferate faster, being more aggressive than U138-MG. Moreover, U138-MG cells have higher expression of the pro-apoptotic protein Bax, being more sensitive to apoptosis [33]. This could explain the different concentrations to which doxazosin was more effective (50 and 75 μM for U138-MG cells and 150 and 180 μM for C6 cells).
Doxazosin’s effective concentrations used on this study on rat C6 cells (150 and 180 μM) exceeds the limits used for most cancer cells on the literature [22,34]. For the human cell line U138-MG, effective doxazosin concentrations are 50 and 75 μM, which is in accordance with what was used in the literature for other cancer cells. Future studies, however, are necessary to determine if this in vitro therapeutic concentrations of doxazosin are effective against glioblastoma in vivo models.
In addition to inducing cell death, doxazosin decreased proliferation, shown by cell cycle arrest in G0/G1 phase and decreased mitotic index. On human LNT-229 and U87-MG GB cells, doxazosin also induced G0/G1 cell cycle arrest and concentration-dependent apoptosis [13]. Several in vitro and in vivo studies show that the main mechanism underlying doxazosin-induced apoptosis is inhibition of receptor-mediated signaling [39,40,41]. Therefore, we suggest that those effects and the apoptosis induction may be related with the decrease of Akt phosphorylation/activation, which possibly affected the Akt downstream targets, GSK-3β and p53. In PC-3 cells, doxazosin induced apoptosis in part through downregulation of Akt cell signaling. Akt plays a pivotal role regulating cell growth and survival in cancer cells. This fact justifies the pharmacological use of doxazosin and derivatives, which possess quinazolinic rings, for the development of a new class of apoptosis-inducing agents, which blocks activation of Akt protein [42].
Moreover, doxazosin was shown to suppress PI3K and Akt phosphorylation on ovarian carcinoma cells [41]. The authors of this study suggest the hypothesis that doxazosin inhibits PI3K/Akt activity. GSK-3β is involved in the processes of apoptosis and cell cycle, as well as p53. One of the most important regulatory mechanism acting on GSK-3β is phosphorylation of Ser9, which inhibits the protein. Several kinases are able to phosphorylate this protein, including Akt [43]. Here we found that doxazosin, possibly through Akt inhibition, decreased GSK-3β Ser9 phosphorylation. Also we observed that doxazosin cell cycle arrest and the decrease on proliferation of C6 and U138-MG glioma cells appears to be mediated by GSK-3β dephosphorylation/activation.
In cancer, GSK-3β has been reported as a “tumor suppressor” by repressing neoplastic transformation and tumor development[44]. GSK-3β also appears to be involved in chemotherapy resistance. When treated with lithium, which is a GSK-3β inhibitor, hepatoma cells became resistant to etoposide and camptothecin. On the other hand, GSK-3β activation with LY294002 and with exogenous expression of Ser9 GSK-3β sensitizes hepatoma cells to apoptosis induced by those drugs [45]. LY294002 can also inhibit expression of p-Akt in cancer cells via PI3K suppression [46], which supports the induction of cell death on C6 and U138-MG cells shown here. Other reports show that GSK-3β activation enhances and sensitizes human breast cancer cells to paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, taxol and prodigiosin [43]. Also, other studies with GSK-3β inhibitors on GBM patients and two established cell lines (U251 and U87-MG) showed that inhibition of GSK-3β phosphorylation significantly reduced tumor invasiveness [6].
Another protein that we found altered by doxazosin treatment is p53. This is a tumor-suppressor protein that is activated upon various types of cellular stresses. The p53 protein is involved with apoptosis induction, with inhibition of cell cycle progression [47], as demonstrated here on C6 and U138-MG cells. In almost all types of cancer, p53 is frequently inactivated, being a central tumor-suppressor. The p53 protein can regulate and be regulated by Akt and also can interact with GSK-3β. It is well established that activation of Akt inhibits p53-mediated apoptosis [47].
The p53 gene is mutated in 30–50% of glioblastomas and this mutation confers increased malignancy and tumorigenicity to the cancer. Also it has been reported that p53 mutation decreases chemosensitivity of malignant gliomas to TMZ [7]. The U138-MG cell line has a TP53 mutation and is TMZ resistant [48]. Here we showed that doxazosin, unlike TMZ, decreased cell viability and induced apoptosis in U138-MG cells, and also increased p53 phosphorylation in these cells.
We also found that doxazosin activated caspase-3 on glioma cells. Caspase-3 can be activated through inhibition of Akt phosphorylation, and consequently leading to the inhibition of this kinase. When Akt is inactive, cells can undergo apoptosis through loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, leading to activation of caspase-9 and caspase-3, resulting in apoptosis [49].
In summary, our results suggest that doxazosin induces caspase-dependent apoptosis, decreased mitotic index and induced cell cycle arrest on C6 and U138-MG glioma cells, and this effect could be mediated by the inhibition of Akt and the activation of GSK-3β and p53 proteins (Fig 7). Besides, we also show that doxazosin has low cytotoxicity on primary astrocytes and hippocampal organotypic cultures.
Conclusions
Development of new effective therapeutic strategies for the treatment of brain tumors is essential to reduce mortality and morbidity of the disease. Characterization of new drugs that may act as an adjuvant to other anti-tumor therapies could be a very useful strategy for treating gliomas. Doxazosin’s pharmacology and safety profile is well-characterized in humans and its adverse-effect profile is acceptable [22], since the most frequent side-effects are dizziness and hypotension [50]. Moreover, Kyprianou and Benning [22] demonstrate that the therapeutic doses of doxazosin with antitumoral effect in mice (3 to 100 mg/Kg) are compared to intracellular doxazosin’s concentrations effective on human prostate cancer cells in vitro (100 μM). They showed in vivo efficacy studies in which doxazosin treatment suppressed significantly the tumorigenic growth of prostate cancer xenographs in SCID mice. Chon et al. [9] and Vashist et al. [51] also demonstrated the in vivo functional significance of doxazosin’s action in a mouse model of prostate hyperplasia and in the persistent reduction of intimal hyperplasia in a rabbit model, respectively.
Therefore, we and others [13,22,41,52] suggest that doxazosin can become a new pharmacotherapy alternative for the treatment of cancer, especially gliomas, although more experiments are needed to further elucidate the mechanism of action of this drug on tumor cells and animal models.
Supporting Information
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
The authors have no support or funding to report.
References
- 1.Van Meir EG, Hadjipanayis CG, Norden AD, Shu H-K, Wen PY, Olson JJ (2010) Exciting New Advances in Neuro-Oncology: The Avenue to a Cure for Malignant Glioma. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians 60: 166–193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hui H, Fernando MA, Heaney AP (2008) The α 1-adrenergic receptor antagonist doxazosin inhibits EGFR and NF-κB signalling to induce breast cancer cell apoptosis. European Journal of Cancer 44: 160–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sonoda Y, Ozawa T, Aldape KD, Deen DF, Berger MS, Pieper RO (2001) Akt pathway activation converts anaplastic astrocytoma to glioblastoma multiforme in a human astrocyte model of glioma. Cancer research 61: 6674–6678. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zhang Y, Zhang N, Dai B, Liu M, Sawaya R, Xie K, et al. (2008) FoxM1B transcriptionally regulates vascular endothelial growth factor expression and promotes the angiogenesis and growth of glioma cells. Cancer research 68: 8733–8742. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1968 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jhanwar-Uniyal M, Labagnara M, Friedman M, Kwasnicki A, Murali R (2015) Glioblastoma: Molecular Pathways, Stem Cells and Therapeutic Targets. Cancers 7: 538 10.3390/cancers7020538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pyko IV, Nakada M, Sabit H, Teng L, Furuyama N, Hayashi Y, et al. (2013) Glycogen synthase kinase 3β inhibition sensitizes human glioblastoma cells to temozolomide by affecting O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation via c-Myc signaling. Carcinogenesis 34: 2206–2217. 10.1093/carcin/bgt182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wang X, Chen J-x, Liu Y-h, You C, Mao Q (2013) Mutant TP53 enhances the resistance of glioblastoma cells to temozolomide by up-regulating O6-methylguanine DNA-methyltransferase. Neurological Sciences 34: 1421–1428. 10.1007/s10072-012-1257-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Antonello A, Hrelia P, Leonardi A, Marucci G, Rosini M, Tarozzi A, et al. (2005) Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of prazosin-related derivatives as multipotent compounds. Journal of medicinal chemistry 48: 28–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chon JK, Borkowski A, PARTIN AW, ISAACS JT, JACOBS SC, KYPRIANOU N (1999) Alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonists terazosin and doxazosin induce prostate apoptosis without affecting cell proliferation in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Journal of urology 161: 2002–2008. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yang G, Timme TL, Park SH, Wu X, Wyllie MG, Thompson TC (1997) Transforming growth factor β1 transduced mouse prostate reconstitutions: II. Induction of apoptosis by doxazosin. The Prostate 33: 157–163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Siddiqui EJ, Shabbir M, Thompson CS, Mumtaz FH, Mikhailidis DP (2005) Growth inhibitory effect of doxazosin on prostate and bladder cancer cells. Is the serotonin receptor pathway involved? Anticancer research 25: 4281–4286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fernando MA, Heaney AP (2005) α1-Adrenergic receptor antagonists: novel therapy for pituitary adenomas. Molecular Endocrinology 19: 3085–3096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Staudacher I, Jehle J, Staudacher K, Pledl H-W, Lemke D, Schweizer PA, et al. (2014) HERG K+ channel-dependent apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in human glioblastoma cells. PloS one 9: e88164 10.1371/journal.pone.0088164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sakamoto S, Kyprianou N (2010) Targeting Anoikis Resistance in Prostate Cancer Metastasis. Molecular aspects of medicine 31: 205–214. 10.1016/j.mam.2010.02.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nikolic K, Filipic S, Smoliński A, Kaliszan R, Agbaba D (2013) Partial least square and hierarchical clustering in ADMET modeling: Prediction of blood–brain barrier permeation of α-adrenergic and imidazoline receptor ligands. Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences 16: 622–647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kaye B, Cussans N, Faulkner J, Stopher D, Reid J (1986) The metabolism and kinetics of doxazosin in man, mouse, rat and dog. British journal of clinical pharmacology 21: 19S–25S. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gottfried C, Valentim L, Salbego C, Karl J, Wofchuk ST, Rodnight R (1999) Regulation of protein phosphorylation in astrocyte cultures by external calcium ions: specific effects on the phosphorylation of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), vimentin and heat shock protein 27 (HSP27). Brain research 833: 142–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Stoppini L, Buchs P-A, Muller D (1991) A simple method for organotypic cultures of nervous tissue. Journal of neuroscience methods 37: 173–182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Horn AP, Gerhardt D, Geyer AB, Valentim L, Cimarosti H, Tavares A, et al. (2005) Cellular death in hippocampus in response to PI3K pathway inhibition and oxygen and glucose deprivation. Neurochemical research 30: 355–361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Vichai V, Kirtikara K (2006) Sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay for cytotoxicity screening. Nature protocols 1: 1112–1116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Parhi P, Mohanty C, Sahoo SK (2012) Nanotechnology-based combinational drug delivery: an emerging approach for cancer therapy. Drug Discovery Today 17: 1044–1052. 10.1016/j.drudis.2012.05.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kyprianou N, Benning CM (2000) Suppression of human prostate cancer cell growth by α1-adrenoceptor antagonists doxazosin and terazosin via induction of apoptosis. Cancer research 60: 4550–4555. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Vlahos CJ, Matter WF, Hui KY, Brown RF (1994) A specific inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, 2-(4-morpholinyl)-8-phenyl-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one (LY294002). Journal of Biological Chemistry 269: 5241–5248. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wen PY, Schiff D, Lee EQ (2011) Neurologic complications of cancer therapy: Demos Medical Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang H, Gao S (2007) Temozolomide/PLGA microparticles and antitumor activity against Glioma C6 cancer cells in vitro. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 329: 122–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dehdashti AR, Hegi ME, Regli L, Pica A, Stupp R (2006) New trends in the medical management of glioblastoma multiforme: the role of temozolomide chemotherapy. Neurosurg Focus 20: E6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lepor H (2007) Alpha Blockers for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Reviews in Urology 9: 181–190. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li D-D, Fang F, Li J-R, Du Q-R, Sun J, Gong H-B, et al. (2012) Discovery of 6-substituted 4-anilinoquinazolines with dioxygenated rings as novel EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters 22: 5870–5875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhang J, Yang PL, Gray NS (2009) Targeting cancer with small molecule kinase inhibitors. Nature Reviews Cancer 9: 28–39. 10.1038/nrc2559 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Giannopoulou E, Dimitropoulos K, Argyriou A, Koutras A, Dimitrakopoulos F, Kalofonos H (2010) An in vitro study, evaluating the effect of sunitinib and/or lapatinib on two glioma cell lines. Investigational New Drugs 28: 554–560. 10.1007/s10637-009-9290-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Harry GJ, Lefebvre d’Hellencourt C (2003) Dentate Gyrus: Alterations that Occur with Hippocampal Injury. NeuroToxicology 24: 343–356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kaku DA, Giffard RG, Choi DW (1993) Neuroprotective effects of glutamate antagonists and extracellular acidity. Science 260: 1516–1518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Vogelbaum MA, Tong JX, Perugu R, Gutmann DH, Rich KM (1999) Overexpression of bax in human glioma cell lines. Journal of neurosurgery 91: 483–489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Petty A, Myshkin E, Qin H, Guo H, Miao H, Tochtrop GP, et al. (2012) A small molecule agonist of EphA2 receptor tyrosine kinase inhibits tumor cell migration in vitro and prostate cancer metastasis in vivo. PloS one 7: e42120 10.1371/journal.pone.0042120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.El Sharkawi FZ, El Shemy HA, Khaled HM (2013) Possible anticancer activity of rosuvastatine, doxazosin, repaglinide and oxcarbazepin. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention: APJCP 15: 199–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ryu CH, Yoon WS, Park KY, Kim SM, Lim JY, Woo JS, et al. (2012) Valproic acid downregulates the expression of MGMT and sensitizes temozolomide-resistant glioma cells. BioMed Research International 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.(2016) Dsmz.de—C6.
- 38.(2016) Dsmz.de—U-138-MG.
- 39.Partin J, Anglin I, Kyprianou N (2003) Quinazoline-based α1-adrenoceptor antagonists induce prostate cancer cell apoptosis via TGF-β signalling and IκBα induction. British journal of cancer 88: 1615–1621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Garrison JB, Kyprianou N (2006) Doxazosin Induces Apoptosis of Benign and Malignant Prostate Cells via a Death Receptor–Mediated Pathway. Cancer research 66: 464–472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Park MS, Kim B-R, Dong SM, Lee S-H, Kim D-Y, Rho SB (2014) The antihypertension drug doxazosin inhibits tumor growth and angiogenesis by decreasing VEGFR-2/Akt/mTOR signaling and VEGF and HIF-1α expression. Oncotarget 5: 4935 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Salagierski M, Sosnowski M (2009) Therapeutic implications of quinazoline-derived α-1 adrenoreceptor inhibitors in BPH and Prostate Cancer. Central European Journal of Urology 62. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Luo J (2009) Glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) in tumorigenesis and cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Letters 273: 194–200. 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.05.045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Medina M, Wandosell F (2011) Deconstructing GSK-3: The Fine Regulation of Its Activity. International Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease 2011: 12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Rocha C, Garcia C, Vieira D, Quinet A, de Andrade-Lima L, Munford V, et al. (2014) Glutathione depletion sensitizes cisplatin-and temozolomide-resistant glioma cells in vitro and in vivo. Cell death & disease 5: e1505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Chen L, Han L, Shi Z, Zhang K, Liu Y, Zheng Y, et al. (2012) LY294002 enhances cytotoxicity of temozolomide in glioma by down-regulation of the PI3K/Akt pathway. Molecular medicine reports 5: 575–579. 10.3892/mmr.2011.674 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Oren M (0000) Decision making by p53: life, death and cancer. Cell Death Differ 10: 431–442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Rocha CRR, Garcia CCM, Vieira DB, Quinet A, de Andrade-Lima LC, Munford V, et al. (2014) Glutathione depletion sensitizes cisplatin- and temozolomide-resistant glioma cells in vitro and in vivo. Cell Death Dis 5: e1505 10.1038/cddis.2014.465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Nikoletopoulou V, Markaki M, Palikaras K, Tavernarakis N (2013) Crosstalk between apoptosis, necrosis and autophagy. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Molecular Cell Research 1833: 3448–3459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Carruthers SG (1994) Adverse effects of α1-adrenergic blocking drugs. Drug Safety 11: 12–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Vashisht R, Sian M, Franks P, O'Malley M (1992) Long-term reduction of intimal hyperplasia by the selective alpha-1 adrenergic antagonist doxazosin. British journal of surgery 79: 1285–1288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Rundle-Thiele D, Head R, Cosgrove L, Martin JH (2015) Repurposing some older drugs that cross the blood–brain barrier and have potential anticancer activity to provide new treatment options for glioblastoma. British journal of clinical pharmacology. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.