Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 19.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Chem Biol. 2015 Mar 18;10(6):1404–1410. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.5b00170

Constructing de Novo H2O2 Signaling via Induced Protein Proximity

Guihua Zeng 1, Roushu Zhang 1, Weimin Xuan 1, Wei Wang 1, Fu-Sen Liang 1,*
PMCID: PMC4849873  NIHMSID: NIHMS774561  PMID: 25775006

Abstract

A new chemical strategy has been developed to generate de novo signaling pathways that link a signaling molecule, H2O2, to different downstream cellular events in mammalian cells. This approach combines the reactivity-based H2O2 sensing with the chemically induced protein proximity technology. By chemically modifying abscisic acid with an H2O2-sensitive boronate ester probe, novel H2O2 signaling pathways can be engineered to induce transcription, protein translocation and membrane ruffle formation upon exogenous or endogenous H2O2 stimulation. This strategy has also been successfully applied to gibberellic acid, which provides the potential to build signaling networks based on orthogonal cell stimuli.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms774561u1.jpg


Nature evolves sophisticated cell signaling circuits that convert perceived environmental signals into proper cellular responses to maintain normal function of cells. Recent efforts have been dedicated to engineer predictable and tailored cellular functions in response to detected stimuli by rewiring or creating synthetic signal transduction pathways.13 These efforts contribute to the understanding of how sophisticated cellular functions and behaviors are built and hold great promise for biological computing4,5 and novel therapeutic applications.6,7

To create a synthetic signaling pathway, one needs to consider how to create a sensing unit that can recognize only the chosen signal, how to transmit and process the detected signal, and how to link a processed decision to a desired functional output. Most of the current methods to engineer synthetic pathways that respond to cellular signals rely on either rewiring nature-evolved pathways or creating de novo synthetic pathways by evolving and selecting novel signaling parts.8 The first approach requires extensive knowledge of native cell signaling pathways and is limited to existing pathways in nature. The second approach can potentially provide unlimited possibility in constructing new signaling pathways. However, it requires substantial efforts and may still not obtain functional products as desired. The engineering information that is gained is also less likely to be transferable to the design of a new signaling component.

The chemically induced proximity (CIP), or chemically induced dimerization (CID), technology has been developed to regulate biological processes using exogenous chemical inducers.9 Each CIP inducer triggers the association between two unique inducer-binding adaptor proteins that are fused individually to two other proteins of interest (POIs). Depending on the choice of POIs, it has been shown that different types of downstream biological events can be triggered by the stimulation of these exogenous inducers.911 This technology provides a rapid and modular way to create novel CIP inducer-responsive synthetic signaling pathways. Several orthogonal CIP systems using different chemical inducers, including rapamycin, abscisic acid (ABA), gibberellic acid (GA), and other synthetic ligands,9,12,13 have been developed for broad biological applications.

H2O2 is a member of the reactive oxygen species (ROS) and an important diffusible secondary messenger in biological systems.14 It plays critical roles in several biological processes (e.g., signal transduction, cell differentiation, and apoptosis) and human diseases (e.g., cancer and neurodegenerative diseases).1519 Here, we report a novel chemical strategy to create de novo H2O2 signaling pathways that can be tailored to give desired downstream biological outcomes by integrating the CIP methods and the H2O2 sensing technology. We showed that new signaling pathways can be engineered to link the H2O2 signal to otherwise unrelated cellular processes, including expression of chosen genes, translocation of chosen proteins, and remodeling of cytoskeleton through activating endogenous Rac1 signaling.

In the design of an H2O2-signaling inducer, an H2O2 responsive masking group is incorporated into a CIP inducer to abolish the protein dimerization ability of the inducer. It is expected that the modified inducer remains inactive until being exposed to H2O2. H2O2 then promotes the chemical cleavage of the masking group to regenerate the original CIP inducer that triggers the predesigned biological effects (Figure 1A).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) General process for H2O2-induced proximity to control biological processes. (B) Synthesis of ABA-HP and its conversion to ABA in the presence of H2O2. (C) ABA-HP (1 mM) was treated with or without 5 mM H2O2 for indicated time periods. (D) ABA-HP (100 μM) was incubated with 100 μM of indicated molecules for 4 h at 37 °C. Error bars are SD (N = 3).

To explore the feasibility of this strategy, we first focused on the ABA CIP system that we developed.12 ABA binds selectively to the PYL protein and causes a conformational change of PYL to create a surface that can subsequently bind the ABI protein. On the basis of the crystal structure, ABA is totally embedded within the PYL pocket where it makes extensive contacts.20 We hypothesize that any chemical modification of ABA will likely disrupt its binding to PYL and therefore abolish the induced association between PYL and ABI. By modifying ABA with a chemical moiety that can be removed by H2O2, the ABA-based CIP activity should then be controlled by H2O2. We have recently shown that modifications at the carboxylic acid group on ABA, which engages in critical hydrogen bonding to PYL,20 disrupted the CIP activity of the caged ABA.21 We expect that a similar strategy can be used to install an H2O2-sensing unit onto ABA to mask its CIP activity. Several H2O2-responsive fluorescent probes have been developed.22 H2O2-inducible systems that control transcription or cellular targeting were also reported.23,24 In these studies, a boronate ester moiety was used as the H2O2-sensing unit. We reason that when ABA is equipped with the same boronate ester moiety, the ABA-inducible CIP should then be controlled by H2O2.

To examine the feasibility of this strategy, we synthesized an H2O2-responsive boronate-conjugated ABA, referred to as ABA-HP (Figure 1B), which is expected to convert back to ABA upon the exposure to H2O2 (Supplementary Figure S1) based on a reported oxidative cleavage mechanism.22 Monitored by HPLC, we observed that, without H2O2, ABA-HP was not hydrolyzed to give ABA in HEPES buffer at 37 °C throughout the 24 h observation period (Figure 1C). A dimer was observed (based on mass spectrometry analysis, Supplementary Figures S2 and S3) during this incubation period, which was likely formed through the coordination between the electron deficient boron on ABA-HP with an oxygen lone pair on another molecule of ABA-HP. Upon the addition of H2O2, ABA-HP started to convert back to ABA within minutes, and the transformation was completed in 4 h (Figure 1C and Supplementary Figure S2). Following the cleavage process using HPLC, we observed that besides the regenerated ABA and the dimeric ABA-HP, another peak appeared, which was converted to ABA at later time points and was likely an intermediate of the conversion (Supplementary Figure S1). To confirm that the dimeric ABA-HP can be converted to ABA, we preincubated ABA-HP in HEPES buffer to form the dimer and then treated it with H2O2. We found that ABA can indeed be generated from this dimer (Supplementary Figure S4). Next, we tested the selectivity of ABA-HP toward H2O2 over other ROS, metal ions, and signaling molecules. ABA-HP was incubated with different molecules as indicated in Figure 1D for 4 h, and the products were analyzed using HPLC. ABA-HP was found to be unreactive to all molecules tested at 100 μM (Figure 1D, Supplementary Figures S5 and S6), except Cu+ and Cu2+, which produced a minimal amount of cleavage but were later shown to have no effects at the more physiologically relevant concentration of 10 μM (Figure 1D, Supplementary Figure S7).

To test if this strategy works in cells, we first investigated whether the H2O2 signal can be linked to activate transcription since most cell signaling events eventually lead to gene expression. We used an HEK293T stable cell line, in which enhanced GFP (EGFP) expression occurs only in the presence of functional ABA.21 This cell line has both the ABA-responsive split transcriptional activator DNA fragment (VP-PYL and GAL4DBD-ABI linked by IRES)12 and an inducible EGFP DNA fragment (with 5xUAS) inserted into the genome (Figure 2Ai). To determine if the ABA generated from the H2O2-induced cleavage of ABA-HP is biologically active, we tested its ability to induce EGFP expression in this HEK293T reporter cell line. We precleaved ABA-HP with H2O2 and added the resulting products to the HEK293T cells. After incubation for 7 h, EGFP production was observed under a fluorescence microscope (Supplementary Figure S8). This result indicates that the regenerated ABA is indeed biologically active. On the contrary, uncleaved ABA-HP failed to induce EGFP expression, which confirmed that the boronate modification blocked the activity of ABA as expected. We next tested whether ABA-HP can respond to H2O2 in cell culture conditions and cause the gene expression to be activated by H2O2 in cells. It has been reported that the endogenous H2O2 concentrations of tissue samples vary from 10 to 100 μM range and that the pathologic tissues usually have even higher levels of H2O2.2529 We therefore tested the response of our system to H2O2 at micromolar concentrations in living cells. The HEK293T reporter cells were treated with no drug, 10 μM ABA, ABA-HP, or ABA-HP plus 10, 50, or 100 μM H2O2 for 5 to 24 h. The expression of EGFP was monitored at indicated time points using a fluorescence microscope. The EGFP expression was detected only when ABA, or ABA-HP plus H2O2, were added (Figure 2B, Supplementary Figure S9). These results confirm that the H2O2-induced cleavage of ABA-HP generates functional ABA in situ. Notably, we observed differential levels of EGFP production when different amounts of H2O2 were added. The ABA CIP system is known to give a wide-range of dosage response.12 These results indicate that this dosage response can be reproduced in the ABA-based H2O2-inducible system. This property can be useful for converting differential levels of H2O2 signals into different levels of transcription activity.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A) DNA constructs for (i) EGFP expression, (ii) EGFP nuclear export, and (iii) Rac1 signaling/ruffle formation. (B) EGFP expression in HEK293T cells under different treating conditions (10 h). (C) Nuclear export of EGFP in CHO cells under different treating conditions (30 min). (D) Ruffle formation of CHO cells under different treating conditions (30 min). (E) Nuclear export of EGFP in A431 cells under different treating conditions. The statistical data was obtained by counting cells to give the percentage of cells showing nuclear export or ruffling over the total EGFP positive cells. Cells were counted from three separate experiments each with five different areas chosen randomly, and over 700 cells were counted for each sample. Scale bar is 100 μm (B) and 20 μm (C–E). Error bars are SD (N = 3). *P-value < 0.001.

One concern for the stability of ABA-HP in cells is the existence of an ester linkage in the molecule, which may be susceptible to the hydrolysis by cellular esterases. In the above experiments, only a minimal level of the EGFP expression was observed within a 10 h period following the addition of ABA-HP in the absence of H2O2 (Figure 2B). This result suggests that the rate of ABA built up from the esterase cleavage of ABA-HP may be much slower than the H2O2-promoted cleavage. We suspect that the bulky benzyl boronate moiety may contribute to the enhanced stability when compared to simple ester structures commonly used in pro-drugs. With an extended incubation period (24 h), the EGFP expression was indeed observed (Supplementary Figure S9). When using a more sensitive ABA-inducible luciferase reporter assay,12 ABA-HP alone indeed induced observable luciferase expression in a shorter time (within 6 h), although free ABA induced a much higher expression of luciferase (Supplementary Figure S10). These results indicate that further structural modifications of the boronate probe (e.g., increasing structural bulkiness near the ester linkage)30 will be required to increase the cellular stability of ABA-HP for applications requiring extended incubation periods.

Many signaling events are regulated through the dynamic subcellular translocation of proteins. To test if we can redirect the H2O2 signal to control protein translocation, we used a reported ABA-inducible EGFP nuclear export system consisting of NES-ABI and EGFP-PYL DNA constructs (Figure 2Aii).12 CHO cells were transfected with both plasmids for 24 h and then incubated without additive, or with 10 μM ABA, ABA-HP, or ABA-HP plus 100 μM H2O2 for 30 min. The subcellular localization of the EGFP-PYL fusion protein was monitored under a fluorescence microscope, and the percentage of cells showing nuclear export in each condition was quantified (Figure 2C). EGFP-PYL showed pan-cellular distribution in the absence of ABA and was localized outside of the nucleus when ABA was added. ABA-HP alone did not change the subcellular location of EGFP-PYL. However, the addition of ABA-HP plus H2O2 caused rapid nuclear export of EGFP-PYL similar to the case when ABA was added. When different concentrations of H2O2 were added, dosage-dependent responses were also observed based on the percentage of cells showing nuclear export (Figure 2C). The lowest detection limit for H2O2 was observed to be around 1 μM. To characterize and correlate the kinetics of H2O2-promoted ABA-HP cleavage and H2O2-induced protein translocation, the ABA-HP cleavage and the EGFP-PYL nuclear export were monitored immediately after ABA-HP and H2O2 addition (from 5 to 30 min, Supplementary Figure S11). Followed by HPLC, we observed that ABA was rapidly generated in 5 min, and the amount was increased with longer incubation periods. It correlated well with the observation that the EGFP nuclear export occurred at around 5 min, and the percentage of cells showing EGFP-PYL translocation also increased with longer incubation periods. These results indicate fast kinetics of ABA-induced dimerization between PYL and ABI. To determine changes at the single cell level, we performed live-cell imaging using a confocal microscope and quantified the fluorescence intensity inside and outside the nucleus of a cell at different time points after ABA or ABA-HP plus H2O2 was added to the transfected cells (Supplementary Figure S12). Consistent with previous observations, cells started to show decreased fluorescence intensity in the nucleus at around 5 min and continuing to decrease thereafter. These results demonstrate that we can link the H2O2 signal to the translocation of a protein to a chosen subcellular location. Several localization signal peptides have been reported,31 which can be used in our system to transport chosen proteins to different subcellular locations upon the stimulation of H2O2.

With this rapidly responsive protein translocation assay at hand, we re-evaluated the stability of ABA-HP against esterases in biological environments (both in cells and in the serum). CHO cells were transfected with the inducible nuclear export DNA constructs for 24 h and then incubated either with ABA-HP for 30 min to 4 h or with ABA-HP that was preincubated (for 30 min to 4 h at 37 °C) with nonheat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) for 30 min in cells (Supplementary Figure S13). The nuclear export of EGFP-PYL was used as an indication of the ABA-HP hydrolysis. It was found that ABA-HP was relatively stable in cells within 30 min as only a minimal percentage of cells showed nuclear export. To rule out the possibility that there may be endogenous H2O2 that could also cleave ABA-HP to give ABA, control experiments were conducted in which cells were pretreated with catalase, an enzyme that has been used to quench H2O2 in cellular experiments,32 for 1 h before adding ABA-HP. No difference in the percentages of cells showing nuclear export was observed with or without catalase pretreatment. These results suggest that the observed ABA-HP hydrolysis is likely caused by esterases. To our surprise, ABA-HP that was preincubated with FBS up to 4 h did not lead to obvious nuclear export when incubated in cells for 30 min. If any cleavage of ABA-HP caused by FBS occurred before adding to cells, a much higher ratio of cells showing nuclear export would be expected. This observation suggests that ABA-HP is stable in FBS for at least 4 h. The difference in results between the incubation in cells and in FBS may likely be due to the different level of esterases in each condition.

To further investigate whether we can integrate the de novo H2O2 signal components into an endogenous signaling network, we examined the possibility of routing the H2O2 signal to induce membrane ruffling through the activation of the endogenous Rac1 signaling pathway. Tiam1 is a guanine exchange factor for Rac1, which is a member of Rho GTPase. The membrane translocation of Tiam1 activates Rac1 signaling and induces ruffle formation.33 We constructed an ABA-inducible Tiam1 membrane localization system, which consists of DNA plasmids encoding the membrane-localized ABI (myr-ABI)12 and the cytoplasmic EGFP/PYL-fused Tiam1 (PYL-EGFP-Tiam1) (Figure 2Aiii). CHO cells were transfected with these plasmids for 24 h and then incubated for 30 min without additive, or with 10 μM ABA, ABA-HP, or ABA-HP plus 100 μM H2O2. The ruffle formation was analyzed by counting the number of cells showing morphological changes among all EGFP positive cells using a confocal microscope. As expected, only when cells were treated with ABA, or ABA-HP plus H2O2, did they show increased ruffle formation (Figure 2D). Either ABA-HP or H2O2 alone gave background levels of ruffling similar to those without drug addition. These results indicate that the ruffling was caused by the presence of free ABA instead of by H2O2 alone. To further confirm that the observed ruffling was induced through activating the endogenous Rac1 signaling, the transfected cells were treated with a Rac1 inhibitor, NSC 23766 (50 μM), for 1 h before adding ABA or ABA-HP plus H2O2. NSC 23766 is known to block the binding between Tiam1 and Rac1 and inhibit the activation of Rac1 signaling.34 The NSC 23766 treatment lead to decreases in the percentage of cells showing ruffling in both cases of ABA and ABA-HP plus H2O2 addition (Figure 2D), which indicated that the Tiam1-activated Rac1 signaling was indeed involved in the observed H2O2-induced ruffling. To examine whether the degree of ruffling can be reduced to the background level, we used higher concentrations of NSC 23766, which, however, led to severe cell death. Alternatively, when we treated cells with lower concentrations of ABA-HP (5 μM) and H2O2 (50 μM), the ruffling was indeed reduced to the background level with the NSC 23766 (50 μM) treatment (Supplementary Figure S14). Overall, the above results demonstrate that our approach enabled an endogenous signaling pathway to become responsive to a new signal (i.e., H2O2), which is not normally associated with the pathway in the tested cell type.

We next tested whether the created H2O2 signaling system can respond to endogenously generated H2O2 instead of exogenously applied H2O2 as in previous experiments. It has been reported that A431 cells can be stimulated by epidermal growth factor (EGF) to produce H2O2 in micromolar concentrations.35,36 A431 cells were transfected with the inducible EGFP nuclear export DNA constructs for 24 h and then treated with no drug, ABA-HP alone, 10 μM ABA-HP plus 100 μM H2O2, or 10 μM ABA-HP plus 500 or 1000 ng/mL of EGF. The percentage of cells showing EGFP-PYL nuclear export in each condition was then quantified using a fluorescence microscope. The EGFP nuclear export was readily detected within 30 min after EGF stimulation, which was similar to the case when cells were stimulated by exogenous H2O2 (Figure 2E). No obvious EGFP nuclear export was observed without EGF stimulation. To confirm that H2O2 was indeed generated by the EGF stimulation to give the observed EGFP-PYL translocation, the EGF-stimulated cells were treated with catalase for 1 h before adding ABA-HP. The level of EGFP nuclear export was found to reduce to a level similar to the case when cells were treated with ABA-HP only (without H2O2 or EGF) (Figure 2E). These results clearly demonstrate that the engineered H2O2 signaling system can respond to the H2O2 generated endogenously in cells.

We expect that the same strategy can be expanded to other CIP inducers, which will allow us to build orthogonal signaling pathways in the same cell and potentially to construct crosstalking pathways. To test this possibility, we applied this strategy to the GA-based CIP system. GA induces the binding between GAI and GID1 proteins in a similar way as ABA does.37 GA has been developed as an orthogonal CIP system that was used to perform cellular computing.13 GA is not cell permeable. It was modified as the acetoxymethoxy ester (GA-AM) to cross the cell membrane and subsequently be cleaved by esterases to generate functional GA.13 It has been shown that the carboxylate group on GA is critical for its biological functions. A minor modification that converts the carboxylate into a nonhydrolyzable hydroxamate abolishes its CIP activity.13 A recent report also showed that photolabile groups can be linked to the carboxylate group on GA to cage its activity.38 We expect that modifying this carboxylate group of GA with the H2O2-sensitive boronate probe will give an H2O2-responsive GA system. We synthesized GA-HP by coupling the boronate group to GA (Figure 3A). We analyzed the chemical stability of GA-HP and its conversion back to GA upon H2O2 addition using HPLC. In the presence of H2O2, GA was rapidly regenerated from GA-HP within 2 h (Figure 3B, Supplementary Figure S15). It was observed that, without H2O2, GA-HP did not release GA when incubated in HEPES buffer for 24 h, although the boronate group was partially hydrolyzed as reported in a similar case to give an inert but convertible product (Supplementary Figures S16 and S17).39 We also tested the selectivity of GA-HP against different ROS and cellular metals and found that GA-HP was selective for H2O2 among tested molecules (Supplementary Figures S18 and S19).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A) Synthesis of GA-HP and its conversion to GA in the presence of H2O2. (B) GA-HP (5 mM) was treated with or without 50 mM of H2O2 for indicated time periods. (C) DNA constructs for EGFP nuclear export and (D) the nuclear export of EGFP in CHO cells under different treating conditions (30 min). The statistical data was obtained by counting cells to give the percentage of cells showing nuclear export over the total EGFP positive cells. Cells were counted from three separate experiments each with five different areas chosen randomly, and over 700 cells were counted for each sample. Scale bar is 20 μm (D). Error bars are SD (N = 3). *P-value < 0.001.

To examine if we can produce biologically active GA from GA-HP in the presence of H2O2 in cells, we made DNA constructs to encode a nuclear exported GID1 (NES-GID1) and a pan-cellular distributed EGFP-tagged GAI (EGFP-GAI) (Figure 3C). CHO cells were transfected with these plasmids for 24 h and then incubated without additive or with 100 μM GA-AM, GA-HP, or GA-HP plus 100 μM H2O2 for 30 min. The percentage of cells showing EGFP-GAI nuclear export was quantified in each condition using a fluorescence microscope (Figure 3D). Only cells treated with GA-AM or GA-HP plus H2O2 showed nuclear export, which indicated that functional GA was generated from GA-HP upon H2O2 addition. Given that GA cannot cross the cell membrane, the observed intracellular effects suggested that the H2O2-induced cleavage of GA-HP occurred inside the cells. The successful implementation of this strategy using GA demonstrates the potential generality of our strategy.

In conclusion, we have developed a novel strategy integrating CIP methods and H2O2-sensing to construct de novo cell signaling pathways that redirected H2O2 to control different cellular processes (i.e., transcription and protein translocation) or to interface with an existing endogenous signaling circuit (i.e., the Rac1 signaling). We have showed that ABA can be converted to become responsive to exogenous or endogenous H2O2 stimulation rapidly and specifically at physiologically relevant concentrations. Moreover, this strategy can be generally applied to different CIP inducers (i.e., ABA and GA). It provides the potential to expand this strategy in building signaling networks when each orthogonal CIP inducer is designed to become activated by a unique signal. We expect that sensing units for different cell signals can be used to replace the H2O2 sensing unit used in this study to switch the responding specificity.40,41 We believe that our novel strategy to engineer de novo cell signaling circuits will have wide applications in the fields of cell signaling research, biocomputing, and synthetic biology and contribute to the future development of gene and cell therapies for human diseases.

METHODS

Methods and any associated references are available in the Supporting Information.

Supplementary Material

SI

Acknowledgments

We thank the Michael J. Fox Foundation (to F.-S.L. and W.W.), the University of New Mexico (to F.-S.L.), and the Shin Fellowship (to G.Z.) for financial support.

Footnotes

Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supporting Information

Methods and additional figures as described in the text. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.Bashor CJ, Horwitz AA, Peisajovich SG, Lim WA. Rewiring cells: synthetic biology as a tool to interrogate the organizational principles of living systems. Annu Rev Biophys. 2010;39:515–537. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.050708.133652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Purnick PE, Weiss R. The second wave of synthetic biology: from modules to systems. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10:410–422. doi: 10.1038/nrm2698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Haynes KA, Silver PA. Eukaryotic systems broaden the scope of synthetic biology. J Cell Biol. 2009;187:589–596. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200908138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Auslander S, Auslander D, Muller M, Wieland M, Fussenegger M. Programmable single-cell mammalian bio-computers. Nature. 2012;487:123–127. doi: 10.1038/nature11149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Miyamoto T, Razavi S, DeRose R, Inoue T. Synthesizing biomolecule-based Boolean logic gates. ACS Synth Biol. 2013;2:72–82. doi: 10.1021/sb3001112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Aubel D, Fussenegger M. Mammalian synthetic biology: from tolls to therapies. Bio Essays. 2009;32:332–345. doi: 10.1002/bies.200900149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ruder WC, Lu T, Collins JJ. Synthetic biology moving into clinic. Science. 2011;333:1248–1252. doi: 10.1126/science.1206843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lim WA. Designing customized cell signaling circuits. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11:393–403. doi: 10.1038/nrm2904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fegan A, White B, Carlson JCT, Wagner CR. Chemically controlled protein assembly: techniques and applications. Chem Rev. 2010;110:3315–3336. doi: 10.1021/cr8002888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gestwicki JE, Marinec PS. Chemical control over protein-protein interactions: beyond inhibitors. Comb Chem High Throughput Screening. 2007;10:667–675. doi: 10.2174/138620707782507296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.DeRose R, Miyamoto T, Inoue T. Manipulating signalling at will: chemically-inducible dimerization (CID) techniques resolve problems in cell biology. Pflugers Arch. 2013;465:409–417. doi: 10.1007/s00424-012-1208-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liang F-S, Ho WQ, Crabtree GR. Engineering the ABA plant stress pathway for regulation of induced proximity. Sci Signal. 2011;4:rs2. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2001449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Miyamoto T, DeRose R, Suarez A, Ueno T, Chen M, Sun T, Wolrgang MJ, Mukherjee C, Meyers DJ, Inoue T. Rapid and orthogonal logic gating with a gibberellin-induced dimerization system. Nat Chem Biol. 2012;8:465–470. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Stone JR, Yang S. Hydrogen peroxide: a signaling messenger. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2006;8:243–270. doi: 10.1089/ars.2006.8.243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rice ME. H2O2, a dynamic neuromodulator. Neuroscientist. 2011;17:389–406. doi: 10.1177/1073858411404531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Xiao Q, Luo Z, Pepe AE, Margariti A, Zeng L, Xu Q. Embryonic stem cell differentiation into smooth muscle cells is mediated by Nox4-produced H2O2. Am J Physiol, Cell Physiol. 2009;296:C711–23. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00442.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nindl G, Peterson NR, Hughes EF, Waite LR, Johnson MT. Effect of hydrogen peroxide on proliferation, apoptosis and interleukin-2 production of Jurkat T cells. Biomed Sci Instrum. 2004;40:123–128. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.López-Lázaro M. Dual role of hydrogen peroxide in cancer: possible relevance to cancer chemoprevention and therapy. Cancer Lett. 2007;252:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2006.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lee J, Giordano S, Zhang J. Autophagy, mitochondria and oxidative stress: cross-talk and redox signaling. Biochem J. 2012;441:523–540. doi: 10.1042/BJ20111451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Miyazono K, Miyakawa T, Sawano Y, Kubota K, Kang H, Asano A, Miyauchi Y, Takahashi M, Zhi Y, Fujita Y, Yoshida T, Kodaira K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Tanokura M. Structural basis of abscisic acid signaling. Nature. 2009;462:609–614. doi: 10.1038/nature08583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wright WC, Guo ZF, Liang FS. Light control of cellular processes by using photocaged abscisic acid. Chem Bio Chem. 2015;16:254–261. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201402576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lippert AR, Van de Bittner GC, Chang CJ. Boronate oxidation as a bioorthogonal reaction approach for studying the chemistry of hydrogen peroxide in living systems. Acc Chem Res. 2011;44:793–804. doi: 10.1021/ar200126t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Govan JM, McIver AL, Riggsbee C, Deiters A. Hydrogen peroxide induced activation of gene expression in mammalian cells using boronate estrone derivatives. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2012;51:9066–9070. doi: 10.1002/anie.201203222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Weinstain R, Savariar EN, Felsen CN, Tsien RY. In vivo targeting of hydrogen peroxide by activatable cell-penetrating peptides. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:874–877. doi: 10.1021/ja411547j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Spanos M, Gras-Najjar J, Letchworth JM, Sanford AL, Toups JV, Sombers LA. Quantitation of hydrogen peroxide fluctuations and their modulation of dopamine dynamics in the rat dorsal striatum using fast-scan cyclic voltammetry. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2013;4:782–789. doi: 10.1021/cn4000499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hyslop PA, Zhang Z, Pearson DV, Phebus LA. Measurement of striatal H2O2 by microdialysis following global forebrain ischemia and reperfusion in the rat: correlation with the cytotoxic potential of H2O2 in vitro. Brain Res. 1995;671:181–186. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)01291-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gill RS, Lee TF, Liu JQ, Chaudhary H, Brocks DR, Bigam DL, Cheung P. Cyclosporine treatment reduces oxygen free radical generation and oxidative stress in the brain of hypoxia-reoxygenated newborn piglets. PLoS One. 2012;7:e40471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mueller S, Riedel HD, Stremmel W. Determination of catalase activity at physiological hydrogen peroxide concentrations. Anal Biochem. 1997;245:55–60. doi: 10.1006/abio.1996.9939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Imlay JA. Cellular defenses against superoxide and hydrogen peroxide. Annu Rev Biochem. 2008;77:755–776. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061606.161055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kusaka N, Maisch J, Nick P, Hayashi K, Nozaki H. Manipulation of intracellular auxin in a single cell by light with esterase-resistant caged auxin. Chem Bio Chem. 2009;10:2195–2202. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200900289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Heijine GV. Signal Pept. 2005 doi: 10.1038/npg.els.0005050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Martinez-Outschoorn UE, Lin Z, Trimmer C, Flomenberg N, Wang C, Pavlides S, Lisanti MP. Cancer cells metabolically “fertilize” the tumor microenvironment with hydrogen peroxide, driving the Warburg effect: implications for PET imaging of human tumors. Cell Cycle. 2011:2504–2520. doi: 10.4161/cc.10.15.16585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Michiels F, Habets GG, Stam JC, van der Kammen RA, Collard JG. A role for Rac in Tiam1-induced membrane ruffling and invasion. Nature. 1995;375:338–340. doi: 10.1038/375338a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fu L, Jiang C, Davis JS. Insulin-like growth factor 1 promotes cancer cell growth via RAC1 activation in ovarian epithelial cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2012;72:3915–3915. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jin H, Heller DH, Kalbacova M, Kim JH, Zhang J, Boghossian AA, Maheshri N, Strano MS. Detection of single-molecule H2O2 signalling from epidermal growth factor receptor using fluorescent single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nat Nanotechnol. 2010;5:302–309. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bae YS, Kang SW, Seo MS, Baines IC, Tekle E, Chock PB, Rhee SG. Epidermal growth factor (EGF)-induced generation of hydrogen peroxide. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:217–221. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Shimada A, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Nakatsu T, Nakajima M, Naoe Y, Ohmiya H, Kato H, Matsuoka M. Structural basis for gibberellin recognition by its receptor GID1. Nature. 2008;456:520–523. doi: 10.1038/nature07546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Schelkle KM, Griesbaum T, Ollech D, Becht S, Buckup T, Hamburger M, Wombacher R. Light-induced protein dimerization by one- and two-photon activation of gibberellic acid derivatives in living cells. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2015;54:2825–2829. doi: 10.1002/anie.201409196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Song CC, Ji R, Du FS, Liang DH, Li ZC. Oxidation-accelerated hydrolysis of the ortho ester-containing acid-labile polymers. ACS Macro Lett. 2013;2:273–277. doi: 10.1021/mz4000392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chan J, Dodani SC, Chang CJ. Reaction-based small-molecule fluorescent probes for chemoselective bioimaging. Nat Chem. 2012;4:973–984. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Choi KY, Swierczewska M, Lee S, Chen X. Protease-activated drug development. Theranostics. 2012;2:156–178. doi: 10.7150/thno.4068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SI

RESOURCES