Abstract
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are myeloid neoplasms characterized by dysplasia in one or more cell lines, ineffective hematopoiesis and variable risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia. In the past few years, important steps have been taken in characterizing the molecular basis of MDS. More recently, somatic mutations in genes encoding core components of the RNA splicing machinery have been detected in high proportions of MDS patients, and are shown to be founding mutations in many instances. These mutations have different clinical significance, and their incorporation into current stratification systems might improve risk assessment in MDS.
Keywords: myeloid neoplasm, myelodysplastic syndrome, myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm, RNA splicing, spliceosome, mutation
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are myeloid neoplasms characterized by dysplasia in one or more cell lines, ineffective hematopoiesis and variable risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML).1 The World Health Organization (WHO) classification criteria2 for MDS diagnosis require evaluation of peripheral blood and bone marrow morphology, combined with cytogenetic analyses, and define the following categories:3 refractory cytopenia with unilineage dysplasia, refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts, refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia, refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB) type 1 (RAEB-1) and 2 (RAEB-2), and MDS with isolated (del 5q)).
These conditions are heterogeneous in terms of life expectancy,4 and risk-based stratification systems have been developed to improve their prognostication, including the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS)5 and the WHO classification-based Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS).6 Both IPSS and WPSS are currently being revised by the International Working Group for Prognosis in MDS to improve their ability to predict the outcome of MDS patients. As comorbidities have a significant impact on clinical outcome, accounting for both disease status and comorbid conditions considerably improves risk stratification in MDS.7
In the past few years, important steps have been taken in characterizing the molecular basis of MDS, and in developing novel molecular tools for diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of these myeloid neoplasms. Acquired somatic mutations of TET2 have been detected in approximately 25% of MDS patients.8, 9 TET2 mutations represent a useful marker of clonal proliferation, although they do not carry prognostic relevance.10 Additional mutant genes, including TP53, EZH2, ETV6, RUNX1 and ASXL1, have been identified in smaller proportions of patients, but mutations in these latter genes have been shown to be independently associated with decreased overall survival in MDS.11
More recently, somatic mutations in genes encoding core components of the RNA splicing machinery have been detected in high proportions of MDS patients.12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 The close association between mutations in one of these genes, SF3B1, and disease phenotype with ring sideroblasts is consistent with a causal relationship.18 In addition, SF3B1 mutations are independent predictors of favorable clinical outcome, especially of low risk of leukemic evolution.18 On the contrary, mutations of SRSF2 or U2AF1, other genes encoding spliceosome components, are associated with unfavorable clinical outcome and a high risk of progression to (AML).14, 15, 16, 17 Incorporation of these mutant genes into current stratification systems might improve risk assessment in MDS.
The recent advances in our understanding of the molecular basis of MDS have also allowed to decipher, at least in part, the pathophysiology of myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms,19 such as refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts associated with marked thrombocytosis and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.20, 21, 22
Acknowledgments
MC has received grant support from Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC).
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
This article was published as part of a supplement that was supported by Novartis, MSD Italia, Roche, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Gilead, Adienne, Italfarmaco, Pierre Fabre Pharmaceuticals with an unrestricted educational contribution to AREO—Associazione Ricerche Emato-Oncologiche (Genoa) and AMS—Associazione Malattie del Sangue (Milan) for the purpose of advancing research in acute and chronic leukemia.
References
- Cazzola M, Malcovati L. Myelodysplastic syndromes--coping with ineffective hematopoiesis. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 536–538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H et al. WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. IARC: Lyon, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Brunning RD, Orazi A, Germing U, Le Beau MM, Porwit A, Bauman I et al. Myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms, overview. In: Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H, et al. (eds). WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. IARC: Lyon, 2008, pp 88–93. [Google Scholar]
- Malcovati L, Della Porta MG, Pascutto C, Invernizzi R, Boni M, Travaglino E et al. Prognostic factors and life expectancy in myelodysplastic syndromes classified according to WHO criteria: a basis for clinical decision making. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 7594–7603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greenberg P, Cox C, LeBeau MM, Fenaux P, Morel P, Sanz G et al. International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 1997; 89: 2079–2088. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Malcovati L, Germing U, Kuendgen A, Della Porta MG, Pascutto C, Invernizzi R et al. Time-dependent prognostic scoring system for predicting survival and leukemic evolution in myelodysplastic syndromes. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 3503–3510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Della Porta MG, Malcovati L, Strupp C, Ambaglio I, Kuendgen A, Zipperer E et al. Risk stratification based on both disease status and extra-hematologic comorbidities in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Haematologica 2011; 96: 441–449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Delhommeau F, Dupont S, Della Valle V, James C, Trannoy S, Masse A et al. Mutation in TET2 in myeloid cancers. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 2289–2301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Langemeijer SM, Kuiper RP, Berends M, Knops R, Aslanyan MG, Massop M et al. Acquired mutations in TET2 are common in myelodysplastic syndromes. Nat Genet 2009; 41: 838–842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith AE, Mohamedali AM, Kulasekararaj A, Lim Z, Gaken J, Lea NC et al. Next-generation sequencing of the TET2 gene in 355 MDS and CMML patients reveals low-abundance mutant clones with early origins, but indicates no definite prognostic value. Blood 2010; 116: 3923–3932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bejar R, Stevenson K, Abdel-Wahab O, Galili N, Nilsson B, Garcia-Manero G et al. Clinical effect of point mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 2496–2506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yoshida K, Sanada M, Shiraishi Y, Nowak D, Nagata Y, Yamamoto R et al. Frequent pathway mutations of splicing machinery in myelodysplasia. Nature 2011; 478: 64–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Papaemmanuil E, Cazzola M, Boultwood J, Malcovati L, Vyas P, Bowen D et al. Somatic SF3B1 mutation in myelodysplasia with ring sideroblasts. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 1384–1395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Graubert TA, Shen D, Ding L, Okeyo-Owuor T, Lunn CL, Shao J et al. Recurrent mutations in the U2AF1 splicing factor in myelodysplastic syndromes. Nat Genet 2012; 44: 53–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Makishima H, Visconte V, Sakaguchi H, Jankowska AM, Abu Kar S, Jerez A et al. Mutations in the spliceosome machinery, a novel and ubiquitous pathway in leukemogenesis. Blood 2012; 119: 3203–3210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Damm F, Kosmider O, Gelsi-Boyer V, Renneville A, Carbuccia N, Hidalgo-Curtis C et al. Mutations affecting mRNA splicing define distinct clinical phenotypes and correlate with patient outcome in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 2012; 119: 3211–3218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thol F, Kade S, Schlarmann C, Loffeld P, Morgan M, Krauter J et al. Frequency and prognostic impact of mutations in SRSF2, U2AF1, and ZRSR2 in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 2012; 119: 3578–3584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Malcovati L, Papaemmanuil E, Bowen DT, Boultwood J, Della Porta MG, Pascutto C et al. Clinical significance of SF3B1 mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood 2011; 118: 6239–6246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hyjek E, Vardiman JW. Myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms. Semin Diagn Pathol 2011; 28: 283–297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Malcovati L, Della Porta MG, Pietra D, Boveri E, Pellagatti A, Galli A et al. Molecular and clinical features of refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts associated with marked thrombocytosis. Blood 2009; 114: 3538–3545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muramatsu H, Makishima H, Maciejewski JP. Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia and atypical chronic myeloid leukemia: novel pathogenetic lesions. Semin Oncol 2012; 39: 67–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cazzola M, Malcovati L, Invernizzi R. Myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Prog 2011; 2011: 264–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
