Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 11.
Published in final edited form as: Tetrahedron Lett. 2016 May 11;57(19):2090–2092. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2016.03.108

An alternative synthesis and x-ray crystallographic confirmation of (−)-stepholidine

Satishkumar V Gadhiya a,b, Chunhua Hu c, Wayne W Harding a,b,d
PMCID: PMC4852479  NIHMSID: NIHMS777298  PMID: 27152055

Abstract

A formal enantioselective synthesis of (−)-stepholidine that provides an alternative preparation of key lactone intermediate 2 is described. The stereostructure of (−)-stepholidine prepared via this method was confirmed by x-ray diffraction.

Keywords: Stepholidine, THPB, Tetrahydroprotoberberine, Dopamine, X-ray crystallography

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name nihms777298u1.jpg


Tetrahydroprotoberberine (THPB) alkaloids are an important class of biologically active compounds. Several THPBs have been reported to possess strong affinity for dopamine receptors.1,2 Dopamine receptor ligands are sought after as biological tools and as potential therapeutics for a range of neuropsychiatric disorders. Hence, the pharmacological potential of THPBs has attracted the attention of synthetic and medicinal chemists for decades.

The naturally-occurring THPB (−)-stepholidine (1), possesses a remarkable pharmacological profile in having dopaminergic D1 agonist/D2 antagonist dual activity. This extremely rare profile is promising as a new therapeutic strategy to treat schizophrenia and psychostimulant abuse.37

A common method to synthesize THPBs is via Mannich cyclization of a 1-benzyltetrahydroisoquinoline intermediate (usually formed via Bischler-Naperialski or Pictet-Spengler reactions), thus forming ring C at a late stage in the synthesis. However, this approach fails to afford high yields in the synthesis of THPBs that have a 9,10 dioxygenated substitution pattern, as displayed by 1.811 One approach to solve this issue is to use a sulfinyl or trimethylsilyl group to direct cyclization in ipso fashion.12,13

An alternative approach to the synthesis of 9,10-dioxygenated aporphines involves the use of a suitable tetra-substituted phenyl intermediate, in which the phenyl ring later becomes ring D of the THPB core. The degree of success of this approach hinges on an efficient preparation of this tetra-substituted intermediate as well as its subsequent transformation to 1. Yang et al utilized the lactone 2 (Figure 2) - prepared via a phenylacetic acid precursor for this purpose, in the first enantioselective synthesis of 1.14 However, preparation of 2 was deemed inefficient and a bottleneck in the synthesis. Later the same group utilized the o-tolunitrile intermediate 3 to provide the ring D motif via reaction of the lithiated derivative of 3 with a chiral sulfinimine.15 The yield for this key step was quite low due to problematic self-condensation. In a third approach, the bromoacid 4 was used as the key tetra-substituted intermediate.16 In this case the preparation of acid 4 and its eventual transformation to 1 (though straightforward) required several synthetic steps.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Structures of key intermediates 2, 3 and 4

Of the three methods to prepare 1 described above, the first synthesis is particularly attractive based on the length of the synthesis and ease of synthesis in general. Since the major obstacle in this synthesis was the formation of 2, we considered alternative approaches to intercept this key intermediate in the synthesis. In this manuscript we report an alternative preparation of 2 as a key intermediate in Yang’s synthesis of 1. In addition, we have confirmed the structure of 1 prepared by this method via x-ray crystallography.

As depicted in Scheme 1, our synthesis of 2 commenced with compound 5 (which is easily obtained by protecting commercially available 4-bromoguaiacol with ethoxymethyl ether). Regioselective reaction of the intermediate benzyne derived from 5 with malonate anion at −78 °C afforded diester 6 in 56% yield.17 The ethoxymethyl group of 6 was exchanged for a benzyl protecting group in two high yielding steps. Here, 6 was refluxed in acidic methanol to effect deprotection of the ethoxymethyl group and this was followed by protection of resulting phenol as the benzyl ether to give 7. Global hydrolysis of the ester functionalities of 7 and subsequent selective esterification of the aliphatic acid functionality, generated acid 8. The acid 8 was converted to an intermediate activated ester via reaction with EDC/HOBt. This ester group was selectively reduced with NaBH4 to provide an alcohol which was then cyclized to the lactone 2. We also effected cyclization of 8 to 2 by selective reduction of the carboxylic acid group of 8 with BH3, followed by lactonization with p-TsOH.18 However, despite the fact that this process was one step shorter, we found that the yield for the conversion was lower (65% for transformation of 8 to 2), than the previously described activated ester method.

Scheme 1. Synthesis of key intermediate 2 and transformation to (−) stepholidine (1).

Scheme 1

Reagents and conditions: a) Diisopropylamine, n-BuLi, dimethyl malonate, THF, −78 °C, 56%; b) i) Conc. HCl, MeOH, reflux; ii) K2CO3, Benzyl bromide, CH3CN, reflux; 100%; c) i)10% NaOH, EtOH, reflux; ii) SOCl2,MeOH, rt, 98%; d) i)EDC, HOBt, DCM; ii) NaBH4, THF, H2O; iii) p-TsOH, CH3CN, 81%;

Thereafter the route developed by Yang was implemented to prepare 1. The spectral data of 1 were in accordance with previously reported values.14

The key enantioselective reaction in the synthesis of 1 involves reduction of a dihydroisoquinoline intermediate to generate a chiral tetrahydroisoquinoline. As was previously reported, the determination of ee at this stage is difficult via chiral HPLC; ee was determined as 99.6% after the final step in the synthesis (removal of the benzyl groups under acidic conditions to give 1). Chiral HPLC, though a very powerful tool, can be unreliable in structure/enantiopurity determination. Thus, to provide unequivocal stereostructural proof, we determined the 3-dimensional structure of 1 by single crystal X-ray diffraction. Figure 3 shows a representation of the x-ray structure, in which a water molecule co-crytallizes with 1. The structure compares favorably with a previously reported crystal structure of 1, isolated from the Chinese medicinal herb, Stephania intermedia.19, 20 This confirms the molecular structure of 1 and also validates the success of the method.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Crystal structure of (−)-stepholidine monohydrate (1.H2O)

In conclusion, the synthesis of 1 was accomplished in 23% overall yield from compound 5 in a fourteen step sequence. This is comparable to Yang’s first synthesis where a 24% yield of 1 was obtained in eleven steps (from a 4-benzyloxy-3-hydroxy phenylacetic acid precursor).14 This, route involves an alternative, reliable preparation of the vital intermediate compound 2. The synthetic manipulations to afford 2 are straightforward, scalable and generally high yielding, (save for the moderately yielding first step; conversion of 5 to 6). This synthetic pathway should be applicable to the generation of chiral analogues of 1 for bioactivity studies.

Supplementary Material

supplement

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Structure of (−)-stepholidine (1)

Highlights.

  • A new synthesis of a key lactone intermediate required for the synthesis of (−)-stepholidine (1) was achieved

  • (−)-Stepholidine was prepared in 23% overall yield in a fourteen-step synthetic sequence

  • The stereostructure of (−)-stepholidine prepared by this method was confirmed by single crystal x-ray diffraction

Acknowledgments

This publication was made possible by Grant Numbers 1SC1GM092282 and G12MD007599 from the National Institutes of Health. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or its divisions.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Supplementary Material

Description of syntheses and NMR spectral data for all new compounds.

References and notes

  • 1.Jin GZ, Wang XL, Shi WX. Sci Sin B. 1986;29:527–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Parraga J, Cabedo N, Andujar S, Piqueras L, Moreno L, Galan A, Angelina E, Enriz RD, Ivorra MD, Sanz MJ, Cortes D. Eur J Med Chem. 2013;68:150–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2013.07.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bhakuni D, Gupta S. Journal of Natural Products. 1982;45:407–411. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yang K, Jin G, Wu J. Current neuropharmacology. 2007;5:289. doi: 10.2174/157015907782793649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Natesan S, Reckless GE, Barlow KB, Odontiadis J, Nobrega JN, Baker GB, George SR, Mamo D, Kapur S. Psychopharmacology. 2008;199:275–289. doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1172-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jin G-Z, Zhu Z-T, Fu Y. Trends in pharmacological sciences. 2002;23:4–7. doi: 10.1016/s0165-6147(00)01929-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Milivojevič N, Krisch I, Sket D, Živin M. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s archives of pharmacology. 2004;369:576–582. doi: 10.1007/s00210-004-0937-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hanaoka M, Hirasawa T, Cho WJ, Yasuda S. Chemical and pharmaceutical bulletin. 2000;48:399–404. doi: 10.1248/cpb.48.399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cushman M, Dekow FW. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 1979;44:407–409. doi: 10.1021/jo00427a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mastranzo VM, Romero JLO, Yuste F, Ortiz B, Sánchez-Obregón R, Ruano JLG. Tetrahedron. 2012;68:1266–1271. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cutter PS, Miller RB, Schore NE. Tetrahedron. 2002;58:1471–1478. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cutter PS, Miller RB, Schore NE. Tetrahedron. 2002;58:1471–1478. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mastranzo VM, Olivares Romero JL, Yuste F, Ortiz B, Sanchez-Obregon R, Garcia Ruano JL. Tetrahedron. 2012;68:1266–1271. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cheng JJ, Yang YS. J Org Chem. 2009;74:9225–8. doi: 10.1021/jo9020826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cheng J, Fu L, Ling C, Yang Y. Heterocycles. 2010;81:2581–2592. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gao S, Cheng J-J, Ling C-Y, Chu W-J, Yang Y-S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014;55:4856–4859. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rathwell DC, Yang SH, Tsang KY, Brimble MA. Angewandte Chemie. 2009;121:8140–8144. doi: 10.1002/anie.200903316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Albrecht S, Defoin A, Salomon E, Tarnus C, Wetterholm A, Haeggstrom JZ. Bioorg Med Chem. 2006;14:7241–57. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2006.06.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wu S, Tinant B, Declercq JP, Van Meerssche M, Chen YY. Acta Crystallogr, Sect C: Cryst Struct Commun. 1987;C43:2126–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.X-ray data (CCDC no. 1454126) can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

supplement

RESOURCES