Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Biochem Biophys. 2015 Sep 5;587:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2015.08.017

Characterization of the structural and protein recognition properties of hybrid PNA-DNA four-way junctions

Douglas Iverson 1, Crystal Serrano 1, Ann Marie Brahan 1, Arik Shams 1, Filbert Totsingan 2, Anthony J Bell Jr 1,*
PMCID: PMC4852880  NIHMSID: NIHMS731227  PMID: 26348651

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the structure and protein recognition properties of hybrid four-way junctions (4WJs) composed of DNA and peptide nucleic acid (PNA) strands. We compare a classic immobile DNA junction, J1, vs. six PNA-DNA junctions, including a number with blunt DNA ends and multiple PNA strands. Circular dichroism (CD) analysis reveals that hybrid 4WJs are composed of helices that possess structures intermediate between A- and B-form DNA, the apparent level of A-form structure correlates with the PNA content. The structure of hybrids that contain one PNA strand is sensitive to Mg+2. For these constructs, the apparent B-form structure and conformational stability (Tm) increase in high Mg+2. The blunt-ended junction, b4WJ-PNA3, possesses the highest B-form CD signals and Tm (40.1°C) values vs. all hybrids and J1. Protein recognition studies are carried out using the recombinant DNA-binding protein, HMGB1b. HMGB1b binds the blunt ended single-PNA hybrids, b4WJ-PNA1 and b4WJ-PNA3, with high affinity. HMGB1b binds the multi-PNA hybrids, 4WJ-PNA1,3 and b4WJ-PNA1,3, but does not form stable protein-nucleic acid complexes. Protein interactions with hybrid 4WJs are influenced by the ratio of A- to B-form helices: hybrids with helices composed of higher levels of B-form structure preferentially associate with HMGB1b.

Keywords: Four-way junctions, peptide nucleic acids (PNAs), high mobility group proteins (HMG), A-DNA helices, B-DNA helices

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms731227u1.jpg

Introduction

Peptide nucleic acid (PNA) is a synthetic nucleic acid with a peptide backbone. PNAs were originally developed as gene targeting drugs 1, DNA mimetics that recognize specific DNA sequences and alter the expression of target genes 2. Like DNA and RNA, PNAs possess standard purine and pyrimidine bases. As do peptides and proteins, PNAs contain a polyamide backbone – typically aminoethyl glycine (AEG). The neutral PNA backbone imparts greater stability than the natural sugar phosphate backbone in hybridization to complementary strands of DNA and RNA3,4. PNA-DNA and PNA-RNA duplexes have higher melting temperature (Tm) values than the corresponding DNA-DNA and DNA-RNA structures 3,4. A schematic of the chemical structures of DNA and PNA monomers is shown in Figure 1A. The polyamide backbone of PNA also confers enhanced nuclease resistance 5. Thus PNAs have been investigated as reagents for antisense applications 610. The majority of PNA-related gene expression studies focus on nucleic acid targets. However, several studies have used PNAs to modulate gene expression by targeting transcription factors1117.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A–B: A) Chemical structure of DNA and PNA monomeric units. B) Schematic of open-x and stacked-x conformers.

We recently expanded upon the PNA-protein targeting strategy by designing hybrid PNA-DNA four-way junctions (4WJs) that bind the DNA-binding proteins, High Mobility Group B1b (HMGB1b) and Histone H1 18. Four-way junctions are immobile versions of Holliday junctions, key intermediates in homologous and site-specific genetic recombination 1921. HMGB1 serves diverse roles as an architectural nuclear protein and proinflammatory cytokine. Our long-term goal is to develop hybrid 4WJs, composed of DNA and PNA, as high affinity ligands against HMGB1 in order to inhibit unintended proinflammatory signaling. The focus of this study is to elucidate the biophysical and protein (HMGB1b) recognition properties of hybrid 4WJs.

X-ray crystallography and NMR structural analysis have confirmed two structural states of immobilized 4WJs: i) an open-x and ii) a stacked-x conformer 2227. In low ionic strength solutions (≤ 100 μM Mg+2), the open-x or unstacked conformer is favored 2228. In high ionic strength solutions (≥ 100 μM Mg+2), the helical arms of each duplex stack coaxially to generate a cruciform or stacked-x structure 2831. Several research labs have confirmed that the stacked-x conformer possesses greater structural heterogeneity than the open-x conformer; these studies show that the stacked-x conformer can fold into the two isomers (I/II and III/IV) displayed in Figure 1B 3235. The hybrid junctions investigated in this study are based on the immobilized DNA junction, J1. J1 possesses an asymmetric sequence pattern that blocks branch migration 3638. Hydroxyradical footprinting, NMR and tr-FRET (time resolved-FRET) experiments show that the branch point sequences of J1 are biased towards the formation of the I/II structural isomer (Figure 1B) 32,39.

In this study, the biophysical and protein-binding characteristics of six hybrid PNA-DNA junctions are investigated. The DNA and PNA strands of each hybrid 4WJ are shown in black and magenta in Figure 2A. The branch point sequences are highlighted in bold text. Three hybrids, 4WJ-PNA1, 4WJ-PNA3 and 4WJ-PNA1,3, contain shorter PNA strands relative to the DNA strands (12 vs. 16) in order to minimize synthetic problems associated with longer PNA sequences (Figure 2A). In our previous study we show that the DNA overhangs, present in 4WJ-PNA1 and 4WJ-PNA3, do not prohibit the formation of immobilized junctions because the non-bonded regions are not located close to the junction branch point 18. To avoid overhanging DNA residues, three hybrids were designed with shorter (blunt) DNA strands: b4WJ-PNA1, b4WJ-PNA3 and b4WJ-PNA1,3.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A–B: A) Native and hybrid junctions. B) 3-D structure of HMGB1b displaying the helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif.

Circular dichroism (CD) analysis reveals that the hybrid 4WJs are composed of helices that possess structures that are intermediate between A- and B-form DNA. Moreover, the apparent level of A-form helices is correlative with the PNA content. The influence of ionic strength (Mg+2) on the secondary structure and conformational stability (Tm) of each hybrid 4WJ is described in the Discussion section. The protein recognition characteristics of each hybrid are evaluated using the recombinant DNA-binding protein, HMGB1b. HMG proteins bind preferentially to bent and cruciform DNA within the minor groove in a non-sequence specific manner. We focus on HMGB1b because the b-box subunit is responsible for important extracellular functional roles of HMGB1 4042. A schematic of the 3-D structure of HMGB1b is displayed in Figure 2B 43,44. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) reveal that HMGB1b binds 4WJs composed of a single PNA strand with similar affinity to the DNA control, J1. HMGB1b binds hybrid junctions with multiple PNAs with relatively lower affinity. Models that describe the basis of HMGB1b binding interactions with hybrid 4WJs are presented in the Discussion.

Materials and Methods

Synthesis of PNA oligomers

Fmoc-protected PNA monomers A, C, G, and T were purchased from Panagene and used without further purification. Fmoc-Lys(Boc)-OH was obtained from Novabiochem and used without further purification. PNA oligomers were synthesized manually by standard Fmoc solid-phase peptide synthesis protocol using Rink amide resin (0.62 mmol/g), HBTU (O-(Benzotriazol-1-yl)-N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate) as activating reagent and N,N-diisopropylethylamine as base. 30 mg of resin was first swollen for 1 h with dichloromethane and downloaded overnight with Fmoc-Lys(Boc)-OH (5.7 mmol) to give a final loading of 0.19 mmol/g. The unreacted amino sites were then blocked using Ac2O/DIEA/NMP (1:2:2). The Fmoc group of the Rink-amide resin and the growing peptide chain was removed by treatment with 20% of piperidine in DMF (2x8 min). Upon completion of the last monomer coupling, PNA oligomers were cleaved from the resin using TFA/m-cresol (9:1) and precipitated with diethyl ether. The crude PNAs were purified by reversed phase HPLC with UV detection at 260 nm, using a C-18 column (2.2 x 25 cm, 300 Å; Grace Vydac Co., Hesperia, CA), and eluting with H2O + 0.1% TFA (eluent A) and CH3CN + 0.1% TFA (eluent B). Elution gradient: 0–100% CH3CN in 40 min and flow rate = 7 mL/min. The resulting pure products were collected, lyophilized, and characterized by MALDI-TOF, which gave positive ions consistent with the final products.

PNA1: H-CAATCCTGAGCA-K-NH2 (MW = 3364.4); found m/z = 3387.21 (M+Na+)

PNA3: H-ATTCGGACTATG-K-NH2 (MW = 3410.4); found m/z = 3433.14 (M+Na+).

MALDI-MS spectra and HPLC chromatographs that indicate high purity end PNA products are included in supporting information. PNA concentrations were determined spectrophotometrically using the following molar extinction coefficients at 260 nm: A =13700, C =6600, G =11700, and T=8600 M−1 cm−1.

Four-way junction oligonucleotides

The sequences for J1 are: 101*, 5′-CGCAATCCTGAGCACG-3′; 102, 5′-CGTGCTCACCGAATCG-3′; 103, 5′-GCATTCGGACTATGGC-3′ and 104, 5′-GCCATAGTGGATTGCG. The sequences for 4WJ:PNA1 are: PNA1, H-CAATCCTGAGCA-K-NH2; 102, 5′-CGTGCTCACCGAATCG-3′; 103*, 5′-GCATTCGGACTATGGC-3′ and 104, 5′-GCCATAGTGGATTGCG. The sequences for b4WJ:PNA1 are: PNA1, H-CAATCCTGAGCA-K-NH2; b102, 5′-TGCTCACCGAATCG-3′; 103*, 5′-GCATTCGGACTATGGC-3′ and b104, 5′-GCCATAGTGGATTG. The sequences for 4WJ:PNA3 are: 101*, 5′-CGCAATCCTGAGCACG-3′; 102, 5′-CGTGCTCACCGAATCG-3′; PNA3: H-ATTCGGACTATG-K-NH2 and 104, 5′-GCCATAGTGGATTGCG. The sequences for b4WJ:PNA3 are: 101*, 5′-CGCAATCCTGAGCACG-3′; nb102, 5′-CGTGCTCACCGAAT-3′; PNA3: H-ATTCGGACTATG-K-NH2 and 104, 5′-GCCATAGTGGATTGCG. The sequences for 4WJ:PNA1,3 are: PNA1, H-CAATCCTGAGCA-K-NH2; 102, 5′-CGTGCTCACCGAATCG-3′; PNA3: H-ATTCGGACTATG-K-NH2 and 104*, 5′-GCCATAGTGGATTGCG. The sequences for b4WJ:PNA1,3 are: PNA1, H-CAATCCTGAGCA-K-NH2; db102, 5′-TGCTCACCGAAT-3′; PNA3: H-ATTCGGACTATG-K-NH2 and bf104*, 5′-CATAGTGGATTG. Fluorescein labeled strands are denoted with an asterisk (101*, 103*, nb104* and bf104*). Each fluorescent strand was purified via HPLC; each non-labeled DNA strand was purified via denaturing polyacrylamide gels. All DNA was purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT). Each junction was formed by lyophilizing a mixture of a fluorescein labeled strand (25 μM) with 5-fold excess of the unlabeled strands (125 μM). The pellet was in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) and 1.0 mM MgCl2, incubated at 95°C for 2 minutes, followed by cooling to room temperature for 12 – 16 hours. To determine purity of each 4WJ, samples were loaded onto 15% mini-PROTEAN native polyacrylamide gels (BioRad) and run for 1 – 5 hours (4°C). The gel running buffer was composed of 0.5 X TBE•MgCl2 buffer (45 mM Trisma, 45 mM boric acid, 1.0 mM EDTA and 1 mM MgCl2), pH 7.6. The gels were subsequently scanned with a Typhoon 9400 Phosphorimager.

Protein expression and purification

HMGB1b from rat was expressed from pHB1-Escherichia coli Bl21(DE3)pLysS in accordance to the methods described by Chow et al.45 The protein was purified via FPLC using an Econo-Pac CM cartridge (Bio-Rad). The crude protein fraction was loaded onto the CM cartridge in the presence of low salt buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH7.0), 50 mM NaCl and eluted with high salt buffer 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH7.0), 500 mM NaCl using a linear gradient. The purity of HMGB1b was monitored by resolution of each sample on 12% SDS-polyacrylamide (29:1 acrylamide:bisacrylamide) gels in Tris-Tricine buffer (150 V for 45 minutes) followed by staining for 12 hours with Comassie Brilliant Blue G-250 46. The concentration of HMGB1b was determined by methods described previously by Pace et al.47. An image (SDS gel) displaying the purity of the proteins is included in the supporting material.

Circular dichroism analysis

CD spectra were recorded using Jasco J-815 spectrometer. A 2.0 μM solution of each 4WJ was prepared in CD analysis buffer: 20 mM HEPES, 30 mM NH4Cl, 200 mM KCl, 2 mM DTT and 10% glycerol. The low Mg+2 CD buffer contained 100 μM MgCl2; the high Mg+2 CD buffer contained 2 mM MgCl2. All spectra were measured in a 0.1 cm path-length quartz cuvette; spectra were recorded from 320 to 200 nm in 1.0 nm increments at 4°C. The thermal denaturation profile of each 4WJ was monitored under the same buffer conditions (low and high Mg+2) at a fixed wavelength (maxima near 275 nm) from 4 to 100°C. The Tm values were calculated by the fitting the average value of at least three independent scans to a sigmoidal curve equation using GraphPad Prism. All of the CD data displayed in Figures 46 and listed in Tables 1 and 2 were based on at least three independent assays.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

CD spectra highlighting A- and B-form signals for J1 vs. single-PNA and multi-PNA 4WJ in low and high Mg+2. Panel A) represents each single- and multi-PNA hybrid vs. J1 in low Mg2. Panel B) represents each single- and multi-PNA hybrid vs. J1 in high Mg2.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

CD thermal denaturation scans of overhang vs. blunted 4WJs in low and high Mg+2. Panels A – C) display the denaturation of: 4WJ:PNA1 vs. b4WJ:PNA1, 4WJ:PNA3 vs. b4WJ:PNA3 and 4WJ:PNA1,3 vs. b4WJ:PNA1,3.

Table 1.

Thermal unfolding temperatures of 4WJs in low and high Mg+2.

Junction J1 4WJ:PNA1 b4WJ:PNA1 4WJ:PNA3 b4WJ:PNA3 4WJ:PNA1,3 b4WJ:PNA1,3
Tm (°C) low Mg+2 39.5 32.4 32.90 29.9 36.5 35.7 31.0
Tm (°C) high Mg+2 40.1 34.1 35.6 35.8 41.4 35.1 32.4
ΔTm (°C) (high – low) 0.6 1.7 2.7 5.9 4.9 − 0.6 1.4

Table 2.

Unfolding temperatures of hybrids 4WJs in low and high Mg+2 vs. J1.

Junction J1 4WJ:PNA1 b4WJ:PNA1 4WJ:PNA3 b4WJ:PNA3 4WJ:PNA1,3 b4WJ:PNA1,3
Tm (°C) low Mg+2 39.5 32.4 32.90 29.93 36.52 35.67 31.01
ΔTm low Mg+2 (°C) (J1 – hybrid) - − 7.1 − 6.6 − 9.6 − 3.0 − 3.8 − 8.5

Tm (°C) high Mg+2 40.1 34.1 35.6 35.8 41.4 35.1 32.4
ΔTm high Mg+2 (°C) (J1 – hybrid) - − 6.0 − 4.5 − 4.3 1.3 − 5.0 − 7.7

Electrophoretic mobility shift assays

To ensure maximum complex (4:1) formation, 500 nM of each 4WJ was incubated with HMGB1b at 4°C for 30 minutes in binding buffer. The binding buffer was composed of 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mM NaCl, 1mM MgCl and 10% (w/v) glycerol. The junction and protein are expressed in terms of molar ratio of protein to junction (P/J). P/J binding interactions were evaluated over a molar ratio range of 3.2:1 (1.6 μM:0.05 μM) to 79:1 (40.0 μM:0.05 μM). Lane 1 corresponds to 0.05 μM of 4WJ, lanes 2 – 8 represent each 4WJ incubated with each protein at protein/DNA ratios of 3.2:1, 6.4:1, 12.8:1, 25.6:1, 47.8:1, 63.4:1 and 79:1. Each sample was loaded onto 15% Mini-PROTEAN TBE precast native polyacrylamide gels (BioRad). EMSAs were run using a buffer composed of 0.5 X TBE•MgCl2 buffer (45 mM Trisma, 45 mM boric acid, 1.0 mM EDTA and 1 mM MgCl2), pH 7.6, at 4°C for 6 – 8 hours. The gels were subsequently scanned with a Typhoon 9400 Phosphorimager.

Results

Four-way junctions

The six hybrid 4WJs of interest are shown in Figure 2A. To determine if each construct forms stable immobilized junctions, samples are prepared under standard conditions (Materials and Methods) and assayed by native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. J1 is loaded in lanes 2 and 9 to ensure a more accurate comparison of each hybrid 4WJ vs. the DNA control throughout the gel. As displayed in Figure 3, four of the six hybrid junctions migrate with similar mobility to that of J1. The blunt single-PNA junctions, b4WJ-PNA1 and b4WJ-PNA3, display electrophoretic patterns that are similar to their derivative structures (lane 4 vs. 3 and lane 6 vs. 5). The mobility patterns of the multi-PNA hybrids, 4WJ-PNA1,3 and b4WJ-PNA1,3, are slower than J1 (lanes 7 and 8 vs. 9) reflecting the loss of charge due to the neutral PNA backbone(s) in these constructs.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel of 4WJs. Lane 1) 101, 2) J1, 3) 4WJ-PNA1, 4) b4WJ-PNA1, 5) 4WJ-PNA3, 6) b4WJ-PNA3, 7) 4WJ-PNA1,3, 8) b4WJ:PNA1,3 and 9) J1.

The presence of fast running (i.e. high mobility) bands in each sample, including the DNA control, indicates that immobilized junctions dissociate to a certain extent during gel analysis. However, the large amount of high mobility bands in the PNA1-derived junctions (lanes 3 and 4) is an area of concern. It is plausible that these bands represent contaminating structures that promote the assembly of larger structures that mimic immobilized 4WJs. To prove that the high mobility bands are not contaminating junction structures, a series of different combinations of double and triple strands of J1 (i.e. 101–102, 102–103, 101-102-103 etc.) are evaluated against each hybrid 4WJ (see Figures 2 – 4 in Ref [48]48). These controls are analogous to those used by Kallenbach and Seeman to characterize J149. As shown in Figure S1A, the double and triple DNA strand combinations do not form slow-running species. Hence, the high mobility bands present in lanes 3 and 4 (Figure 3) presumably represent dissociated fragments of immobilized PNA1 junctions.

CD analysis of the secondary structure of hybrid 4WJs

The CD spectra of B- and A-form nucleic acid helices possess distinctive signatures; the B-form helices found in duplex DNA and 4WJs have a minimum and maxima at 250 and 280 nm in their CD bands 5054. By contrast the CD bands of A-form helices of duplex DNA and RNA show a minima near 205 nm and a maxima between 260 and 270 nm 53,55. Figure 4 compares the CD spectra of single- and multi-PNA junctions vs. J1 (black line). Panels A and B display scans run in low Mg+2 (100 μM) and high Mg+2 (2 mM). The CD spectrum of J1 is consistent with a full complement of B-form DNA helical arms having spectral minima and maxima at 250 and 280 nm. The CD spectra of each hybrid junction, however, display global helical conformations that are intermediate between A- and B-form DNA. Each hybrid possesses a prominent A-form band at 205 nm that is absent in the DNA control, J1. Moreover, the position of the maxima for each hybrid is shifted either slightly or significantly from 280 nm to shorter wavelengths vs. J1. The single-PNA junctions: 4WJ-PNA1, b4WJ-PNA1, 4WJ-PNA3 and b4WJ-PNA3 display moderate shifts (2 – 8 nm) from 280 nm (Figure 4). The multi-PNA junctions, 4WJ-PNA1,3 and b4WJ-PNA1,3, exhibit more significant shifts (~15 nm) from 280 nm (Figure 4).

To determine if the A- and B-form CD signatures are unique to hybrid 4WJs and not the result of PNA structural isomers per se, the CD spectra of the hybrid 4WJs are compared to the spectra of PNA duplexes. The report by Wittung et al. clearly shows that the CD signatures of PNA duplexes are strongly influenced by the sequence and the amino acid at the C-terminus 56. According to their results, PNA duplexes have min/maxima at the following wavelengths: 220 nm (min), 240 nm (max), 255 nm (min) and 275 nm (max). The CD signals at 220 and 240 nm are unique to PNA duplexes, whereas the signatures above 250 nm resemble those of B-form DNA. As shown in Figure 4, the CD spectra of each hybrid do not conform to those of PNA duplexes. Each spectrum in Figure 4 is based on at least three independent assays.

Analysis of the change in apparent A- and B-form content in low and high Mg+2

The CD data are analyzed further to: i) determine the apparent levels of A- and B-form helices within the global helical structure of each spectrum and ii) investigate the influence of ionic strength on secondary structure. The apparent level of A- and B-form helices are estimated by using the signals at 205 and 250 nm to represent the apparent population of A- and B-form helices. The signals between 265 nm and 280 nm are excluded because these bands represent heterogeneous A- and B-form conformers. Figure 5 displays the apparent fraction of A-form (AFA) and B-form (AFB) helices recorded in low and high Mg+2. The hatched bars represent apparent helical fractions calculated in low Mg+2; the solid bars represent the apparent helical fractions calculated in high Mg+2. As expected, the secondary structure of the DNA control J1 consists predominantly of B-form helices. For J1, the AFB values exceed 0.85 in low and high Mg+2 (Figure 5A). The structural features of the single-PNA junctions display two clear trends: i) the AFB values are sensitive to Mg+2 and ii) the blunt hybrids possess larger AFB values than their root structures. As shown in Figure 5A, the AFB value of each single-PNA construct increases in high Mg+2 (solid bars); three of four hybrids possess AFB values > 0.5. A comparison of the trends of PNA1- vs. PNA3-derived hybrids reveals, that the secondary structure of the PNA3-derived hybrids is more sensitive to Mg+2. 4WJ-PNA3 and b4WJ-PNA3 display an approximate 2-fold increase of AFB levels in high Mg+2, with the AFB value for b4WJ-PNA3 being nearly identical to J1. The corresponding change(s) in apparent A-form fractions for each construct is displayed in Figure 5B. The large AFA values (> 0.9) for the multi-PNA hybrids reflect the CD signatures displayed in Figure 4. Moreover, the structure of the multi-PNA junctions is not sensitive to high ionic strength.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Bar graphs displaying the apparent fraction of B- and A-form helices for each junction in low and high Mg+2. Panel A) represents the fraction of B-form helices (AFB). Panel B) represents the fraction of B-form helices (AFA).

CD analysis of the thermal unfolding temperature (Tm) of hybrid 4WJs

The CD wavelength scans clearly show that ionic strength strongly influences the secondary structure of certain (i.e. single-PNA) hybrid junctions. We are interested in determining if a similar correlative links ionic strength to the conformational stability of hybrid 4WJs. The Tm values for each junction measured in low and high Mg+2 are listed in Table 1. The Tm values show that the majority of hybrid junctions (five of six) display an increase in stability in high Mg+2. The ΔTm values for these hybrids range from 1.4°C (b4WJ-PNA1,3) to 5.9°C (4WJ-PNA3). One hybrid, 4WJ-PNA1,3, is slightly less stable in high Mg+2 (ΔTm = − 0. 6). The relative increase in Tm for the majority of hybrid 4WJs may be attributed to the excess solvated Mg+2 ions, Mg[(H2O)6]+2, that form a stabilizing solvent shell around the junction lattice.

A comparison of the Tm values of the hybrid junctions vs. J1 reveals that the majority of the hybrids (five of six) are, somewhat surprisingly, less stable than J1. The ΔTm values for each hybrid vs. J1 in low and high Mg+2 are listed in Table 2. As expected, the thermal unfolding values are reduced significantly in low Mg+2; the ΔTm value for each hybrid vs. J1 in low Mg+2 range from − 9.6°C (4WJ-PNA3) to − 3.0°C (b4WJ-PNA3). Upon shifting to high Mg+2, the ΔTm values of the hybrids vs. J1 range from − 7.7°C (b4WJ-PNA1,3) to 1.3°C (b4WJ-PNA3).

Comparison of the Tm values of hybrids with DNA overhang vs. blunt ends

A direct comparison of the Tm values of the hybrids with DNA overhangs vs. blunt-ended hybrids supplies a more direct method to evaluate the efficiency of the DNA end-shortening strategy. The Tm values for each hybrid junction are listed in Table 3; the corresponding CD temperature melt scans are displayed in Figure 6. As shown in Table 3, the end-shortened strategy is most effective for the single-PNA hybrids. In low Mg+2, the Tm values for b4WJ-PNA1 and b4WJ-PNA3 are 0.6° and 6.6°C higher than their derivatives 4WJ-PNA1 and 4WJ-PNA3. In high Mg+2, the Tm values for b4WJ-PNA1 and b4WJ-PNA3 are 1.5° and 5.5°C higher than their derivative structures. As shown in Figure 6A, the PNA1-derived junctions display cooperative unfolding transitions in low and high Mg+2. The denaturation profiles of the PNA3-derived junctions do not posses a clear cooperative transition in low Mg+2 (Figure 6B). Upon shifting to high Mg+2, the denaturation profiles of 4WJ-PNA3 and b4WJ-PNA3 display more discreet transitions between folded and unfolded states (Figure 6B). For the multi-PNA hybrids, the thermal unfolding data shows that end-shortening does not enhance the stability of the b4WJ-PNA1,3 vs. 4WJ-PNA1,3. As shown in Table 3, the Tm value for b4WJ-PNA1,3 is −4.7°C lower than 4WJ-PNA1,3 in low Mg+2; the Tm for b4WJ-PNA1,3 is −2.7°C lower in high Mg+2. With respect to the denaturation curves, both multi-PNA hybrid displays a clear cooperative transition between folded and unfolded states in low and high Mg+2 (Figure 6C). The denaturation scans are based on an average of at least three independent assays.

Table 3.

Unfolding temperatures of overhang vs. blunt 4WJs in low and high Mg+2.

Junction 4WJ:PNA1 b4WJ:PNA1 4WJ:PNA3 b4WJ:PNA3 4WJ:PNA1,3 b4WJ:PNA1,3
Tm (°C) low Mg+2 32.4 32.9 29.9 36.5 35.7 31.0
ΔTm (°C) (overhang – blunt) 0.5 6.6 − 4.7

Tm (°C) high Mg+2 34.1 35.6 35.8 41.4 35.1 32.4
ΔTm (°C) (overhang – blunt) 1.5 5.6 − 2.7

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSAs) of 4WJ:HMGB1b binding interactions

Finally, EMSAs are used to evaluate the binding affinity of the previously uncharacterized hybrid 4WJs: b4WJ-PNA1, b4WJ-PNA3, 4WJ-PNA1,3 and b4WJ-PNA1,3 toward the recombinant DNA-binding protein, HMGB1b. Xin et al. used fluorescence binding and analytical ultracentrifugation analysis to show that HMGB1b binds J1 with a stoichiometry of four to one (4:1), presumably favoring the open configuration 57. The complex typically migrates as a single band without intermediate binding species. In our previous study, EMSAs were used to measure the binding constants of 4WJ-PNA1 and 4WJ-PNA3 toward HMGB1b. This report showed that the protein binds 4WJ-PNA3 with a nearly identical affinity to J1 (KD ~ 6.0 μM) and 4WJ-PNA1 slightly less (KD ~ 16.0 μM) 18. Moreover, these data show that the insertion of a PNA strand into the immobilized lattice of J1 does not abolish protein recognition. In this study, the effect(s) of DNA length (i.e. blunt hybrids) and insertion of additional PNA strands (i.e. multi-PNA hybrids) are monitored.

The EMSA data are displayed in Figure 7. Panels A – E represent: J1, b4WJ-PNA1, b4WJ-PNA3, 4WJ-PNA1,3 and b4WJ-PNA1,3. In each gel, lane 1 contains the 4WJ control (without protein); lanes 2 – 8 report on the mobility of 4WJ in the presence of increasing amounts of protein. The protein and junction are expressed in terms of molar ratio of protein to junction (P/J). As shown in Figure 7 (panel A), HMGB1b binds J1 with high affinity. The protein displays initial binding to J1 at a P/J molar ratio of 3.2:1 (lane 3). Complete binding of HMGB1b to J1 is achieved upon increasing the P/J ratio to 6.4:1 (lane 4). Tight binding is indicated by the absence of any free J1. As shown in panel B, HMGB1b binds b4WJ-PNA1 with high affinity as well. The protein displays initial binding interactions with b4WJ-PNA1 at a P/J ratio of 3.2:1 (lane 3). Complete binding of HMGB1b to b4WJ-PNA1 is achieved at a P/J ratio of 12.8:1 (lane 5). HMGB1b binds b4WJ-PNA3 with slightly lower affinity than J1 and b4WJ-PNA1. In this case, the protein displays initial binding toward b4WJ-PNA3 at a P/J ratio of 6.4:1 (lane 5). Complete binding of HMGB1b to b4WJ-PNA3 is achieved upon increasing the amount of protein to ≥ 12.8:1 (lanes 6 – 9). The EMSA profiles of the multi-PNA hybrids, 4WJ-PNA1,3 and b4WJ-PNA1,3 are shown in panels D and E. HMGB1b binds 4WJ-PNA1,3 beginning at a P/J ratio of 12.8:1 (panel D, lane 5) and binding appears to increase as the P/J molar ratio increases beyond 24:1 (lanes 6–8). In this case, protein binding is detected by the reduction of free 4WJ-PNA1,3 and the appearance of broadened/smeared bands, indicative of metastable 4:1 complexes (lane 8). The binding affinity profile of b4WJ-PNA1,3 displays a similar pattern to 4WJ-PNA1,3. HMGB1b:b4WJ-PNA1,3 binding is reflected by a reduction of free b4WJ-PNA1,3 and the appearance of broadened/smeared bands (lanes 6 – 8). These data indicate that HMGB1b binds the multi-PNA constructs but dos not form stable 4:1 complexes. Each EMSA represents at least three independent runs/junction.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

EMSA of HMGB1b binding with: A) J1, B) b4WJ:PNA1, C) b4WJ:PNA3, D) 4WJ:PNA1,3 and E) b4WJ:PNA1,3.

Discussion

The current study is the first to focus on hybrid 4WJs composed of blunt DNA ends and multiple PNA strands. The overall structural features of each hybrid junction are determined via gel electrophoresis. Despite the substantial reduction in electrostatic charge, single- and multi-PNA 4WJs have similar migration patterns to J1. The multi-PNA junctions migrate slightly slower than J1 and single-PNA junctions. The less pronounced difference in electrophoretic mobility is expected because DNA-PNA gel shift assays are sensitive to conformational properties in the resulting hybrid nucleic acid complex as opposed to differences in mass or charge of the complex. For example, Peffer et al. showed that the difference in electrophoretic mobility of a large DNA duplex (217 nucleotides) vs. the resulting PNA-DNA triplexes (227 nucleotides) was strongly dependent on the shape of the triplex 58. More specifically, PNA-DNA triplexes that possessed a significant bend migrated more slowly than linear triplexes. In our study, each 4WJ possesses a similar size and global conformation (stacked-x) that migrates in nearly a charge independent manner.

The CD data suggests that the helical structure(s) of each hybrid 4WJ are intermediate between A- and B-form DNA. The structural heterogeneity of the hybrid PNA-DNA junctions is consistent with the findings by Eriksson et al. 60. This report showed that the 3-D structure of a PNA-DNA duplex possesses characteristics of A- and B-form DNA 60. In this study, both single- and multi-PNA hybrids display an ~4-fold increase in the amplitude at 205 nm vs. J1. The minima at 205 nm provide strong evidence that the hybrid junctions possess a significant population of A-form structure.

Our studies also indicate that the structure of single-PNA 4WJs is more sensitive to ionic strength. The AFB values for each single-PNA junction are < 0.5 in low Mg+2. Upon shifting to high Mg+2, the AFB values of these constructs (with the exception of 4WJ-PNA1) increase beyond 0.5. Although CD does not provide high-resolution information, logic suggests that the structural dimensions (i.e major and minor groove) of the single-PNA junctions are similar to J1 based on the large ratio of DNA to PNA strands (3:1). For duplex DNA, the preference of B- vs. A-form helices in high activity solvents is well known 6163. Taking this into account, the suspected widened major groove of the single-PNA hybrids more readily accommodates solvated Mg+2 ions to promote the formation of B-form helices. The multi-PNA junctions presumably have a narrow major groove (associated with A-DNA structure) that does not readily accommodate solvated Mg+2 ions. For the single-PNA hybrids, high ionic strength conditions may also favor B-form helices by: i) reducing the repulsion between the DNA phosphate backbones, particularly at the branch point and ii) more effectively hydrating the phosphate backbones of the DNA strands. Support for this hypothesis is provided by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations data that show B-DNA helices are preferred in high activity solvent(s) due to favorable solvation free energy values 64,65. The corresponding solvation free energy values are considerably smaller for A-DNA helices 64.

Finally, the protein recognition properties of the previously uncharacterized junctions: b4WJ-PNA1, b4WJ-PNA3, 4WJ-PNA1,3 and b4WJ-PNA1,3 are evaluated with HMGB1b. The protein binds b4WJ-PNA1 and b4WJ-PNA3 with similar affinity to J1. With respect to the multi-PNA hybrids, HMGB1b recognizes both constructs but does not consistently form discrete 4:1 complexes. One plausible explanation for the reduced level of the protein affinity for these hybrids is linked with significant alterations of the helix rotation angle. To date, one 3-D crystal structure of a DNA junction composed of four asymmetric strands has been solved 26. The rotation angle (Jtwist) between the two helices of this structure is 56.5°, a value that is strikingly close to the Jtwist value of 60° that was determined using electrophoresis, FRET and atomic force microscopy analysis 29,6669. The EMSAs are run in high ionic strength conditions (1 mM Mg+2). Hence, we presume the junctions are stacked-x conformers that possess Jtwist values near 60°. Figure 8 displays a model of HMGB1b binding to single- and multi-PNA hybrids. The model displays the predominant structural isomer - I/II. As shown in Figure 8A, the single-PNA 4WJs (and J1) possess Jtwist angles (~60°) that facilitate strong protein binding interactions. Hence, HMGB1b forms stable 4:1 complexes with this class of hybrid 4WJs. As shown in panel B, the multi-PNA junctions may possess Jtwist values that deviate significantly from 60°. A phenomenon that is likely the result of the flexible PNA strands within the junction lattice. This viewpoint is supported by NMR studies of PNA-DNA duplexes that show each hybrid possesses heterogeneous base stacking arrangements that are attributed to the high degree of flexibility of the PNA backbone 60,70.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

A–B: Binding models of HMGB1b binding to the I/II structural isomer of J1 and hybrid PNA-DNA junctions. Panel A displays J1 and single-PNA 4WJs. Panel B displays J1 and multi-PNA 4WJs.

Conclusion

PNA-DNA four-way junctions are composed of helices that are intermediate between A- and B-DNA; the apparent level(s) of A-form structure correlate with PNA content. The single-PNA constructs favor B-DNA structures and possess enhanced Tm values in high Mg+2. Future studies will be conducted with to determine if different di- and monovalent cations generate similar results. The single-PNA junction, b4WJ-PNA3, possesses larger apparent B-form structure (AFB) and Tm values than the DNA control, J1. HMGB1b also binds b4WJ-PNA3 with high affinity. These results clearly show that the insertion of a PNA strand and DNA end-shortening are effective means to stabilize 4WJs without comprising protein recognition. Future studies will focus on developing novel strategies to shift/constrain the topology of the multi-PNA toward conformations that favor HMGB recognition.

Highlights.

  • Immobilized four-way junctions assembled from PNA and DNA strands contain mixed A- and B-form helices.

  • The apparent level of A-form helical content of hybrid PNA-DNA four-way junctions is correlative with PNA content.

  • The secondary structure of hybrid PNA-DNA junctions composed of single PNA strands is sensitive to Mg+2.

  • The DNA-binding protein, HMGB1b, readily recognizes hybrid PNA-DNA junctions.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Mississippi INBRE, funded by an Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under grant number P20GM103476 and startup funds from The University of Southern Mississippi.

Footnotes

Author Contributions.

DI and CCS planned, performed experiments and analyzed data. AMB and AS performed experiments. FT contributed essential materials. AJB Jr. planned and performed experiments, analyzed data and wrote paper.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Nielsen PE, Egholm M, Berg RH, Buchardt O. Sequence-selective recognition of DNA by strand displacement with a thymine-substituted polyamide. Science. 1991;254:1497–1500. doi: 10.1126/science.1962210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nielsen PE. A new molecule of life? Scientific American. 2008;299:64–71. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican1208-64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Egholm M, Buchardt O, Nielsen PE, Berg RH. Peptide nucleic acids (PNA). Oligonucleotide analogs with an achiral peptide backbone. J Am Chem Soc. 1992;114:1895–1897. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Egholm M, Buchardt O, Christensen L, Behrens C, Freier SM, Driver DA, Berg RH, Kim SK, Nordén B, Nielsen PE. PNA hybridizes to complementary oligonucleotides obeying the Watson-Crick hydrogen-bonding rules. Nature. 1993;365:566–568. doi: 10.1038/365566a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Demidov VV, Potaman VN, Frank-Kamenetskil MD, Egholm M, Buchard O, Sönnichsen SH, Nlelsen PE. Stability of peptide nucleic acids in human serum and cellular extracts. Biochemical Pharmacology. 1994;48:1310–1313. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(94)90171-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hanvey JC, Peffer NJ, Bisi JE, Thomson SA, Cadilla R, Josey JA, Ricca DJ, Hassman CF, Bonham MA, Au KG. Antisense and antigene properties of peptide nucleic acids. Science. 1992;258:1481–1485. doi: 10.1126/science.1279811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Larsen HJ, Nielsen PE. Transcription-Mediated Binding of Peptide Nucleic Acid (PNA) to Double-Stranded DNA: Sequence-Specific Suicide Transcription. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996;24:458–463. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.3.458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hyrup B, Nielsen PE. Peptide nucleic acids (PNA): synthesis, properties and potential applications. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry. 1996;4:5–23. doi: 10.1016/0968-0896(95)00171-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nielsen PE. Peptide nucleic acids (PNA) in chemical biology and drug discovery. Chem Biodivers. 2010;7:786–804. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.201000005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gasser G, Sosniak AM, Metzler-Nolte N. Metal-containing peptide nucleic acid conjugates. Dalton Trans. 2011;40:7061. doi: 10.1039/c0dt01706j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mischiati C, Borgatti M, Bianchi N, Rutigliano C, Tomassetti M, Feriotto G, Gambari R. Interaction of the human NF-κB p52 transcription factor with DNA-PNA hybrids mimicking the NF-κB binding sites of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 promoter. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:33114–33122. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.46.33114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Borgatti M, Lampronti I, Romanelli A, Pedone C, Saviano M, Bianchi N, Mischiati C, Gambari R. Transcription factor decoy molecules based on a peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-DNA chimera mimicking Sp1 binding sites. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:7500–7509. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206780200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gambari R. New trends in the development of transcription factor decoy (TFD) pharmacotherapy. Curr Drug Targets. 2004;5:419–430. doi: 10.2174/1389450043345416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Piva R, Penolazzi L, Zennaro M, Bianchini E, Magri E, Borgatti M, Lampronti I, Lambertini E, Tavanti E, Gambari R. Induction of Apoptosis of Osteoclasts by Targeting Transcription Factors with Decoy Molecules. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1091:509–516. doi: 10.1196/annals.1378.092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Finotti A, Borgatti M, Bezzerri V, Nicolis E, Lampronti I, Dechecchi M, Mancini I, Cabrini G, Saviano M, Avitabile C, et al. Effects of decoy molecules targeting NF-kappaB transcription factors in Cystic fibrosis IB3-1 cells: recruitment of NF-kappaB to the IL-8 gene promoter and transcription of the IL-8 gene. Artif DNA PNA XNA. 2012;3:97–296. doi: 10.4161/adna.21061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cabrini G, Bezzerri V, Mancini I, Nicolis E, Dechecchi MC, Tamanini A, Lampronti I, Piccagli L, Bianchi N, Borgatti M, et al. Targeting transcription factor activity as a strategy to inhibit pro-inflammatory genes involved in cystic fibrosis: decoy oligonucleotides and low-molecular weight compounds. Curr Med Chem. 2010;17:4392–4404. doi: 10.2174/092986710793361243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gambari R, Borgatti M, Bezzerri V, Nicolis E, Lampronti I, Dechecchi MC, Mancini I, Tamanini A, Cabrini G. Decoy oligodeoxyribonucleotides and peptide nucleic acids–DNA chimeras targeting nuclear factor kappa-B: Inhibition of IL-8 gene expression in cystic fibrosis cells infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biochemical Pharmacology. 2010;80:1887–1894. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2010.06.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Totsingan F, Bell AJ., Jr Interaction of HMG proteins and H1 with hybrid PNA-DNA junctions. Protein Science. 2013;22:1552–1562. doi: 10.1002/pro.2342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schwacha A, Kleckner N. Identification of double Holliday junctions as intermediates in meiotic recombination. Cell. 1995;83:783–791. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90191-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hoess R, Wierzbicki A, Abremski K. Isolation and characterization of intermediates in site-specific recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987;84:6840–6844. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.19.6840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kitts PA, Nash HA. Homology-dependent interactions in phage λ site-specific recombination. Nature. 1987;329:346–348. doi: 10.1038/329346a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gopaul DN, Guo F, Van Duyne GD. Structure of the Holliday junction intermediate in Cre-loxP site-specific recombination. EMBO J. 1998;17:4175–4187. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.14.4175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ortiz-Lombardía M, González A, Eritja R, Aymamí J, Azorín F, Coll M. Crystal structure of a DNA Holliday junction. Nat Struct Biol. 1999;6:913–917. doi: 10.1038/13277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ariyoshi M, Nishino T, Iwasaki H, Shinagawa H, Morikawa K. Crystal structure of the holliday junction DNA in complex with a single RuvA tetramer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:8257–8262. doi: 10.1073/pnas.140212997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hays FA, Watson J, Ho PS. Caution! DNA crossing: crystal structures of Holliday junctions. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:49663–49666. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R300033200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Khuu P, Ho PS. A Rare Nucleotide Base Tautomer in the Structure of an Asymmetric DNA Junction. Biochemistry. 2009;48:7824–7832. doi: 10.1021/bi900829b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pikkemaat JA, van den Elst H, van Boom JH, Altona C. NMR studies and conformational analysis of a DNA four-way junction formed in a linear synthetic oligonucleotide. Biochemistry. 1994;33:14896–14907. doi: 10.1021/bi00253a029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lilley DMJ. Structures of helical junctions in nucleic acids. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics. 2000;33:109–159. doi: 10.1017/s0033583500003590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Duckett DR, Murchie AI, Diekmann S, Kitzing von E, Kemper B, Lilley DM. The structure of the Holliday junction, and its resolution. Cell. 1988;55:79–89. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90011-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Duckett DR, Murchie AI, Lilley DM. The role of metal ions in the conformation of the four-way DNA junction. EMBO J. 1990;9:583–590. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08146.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Duckett DR, Murchie AI, Giraud-Panis MJ, Pöhler JR, Lilley DM. Structure of the four-way DNA junction and its interaction with proteins. Philos Trans R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci. 1995;347:27–36. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1995.0005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Miick SM, Fee RS, Millar DP, Chazin WJ. Crossover isomer bias is the primary sequence-dependent property of immobilized Holliday junctions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:9080–9084. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.17.9080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Grainger RJ, Murchie AI, Lilley DM. Exchange between stacking conformers in a four-Way DNA junction. Biochemistry. 1998;37:23–32. doi: 10.1021/bi9721492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.McKinney SA, Déclais A-C, Lilley DMJ, Ha T. Structural dynamics of individual Holliday junctions. Nat Struct Biol. 2002;10:93–97. doi: 10.1038/nsb883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Joo C, McKinney SA, Lilley DMJ, Ha T. Exploring rare conformational species and ionic effects in DNA Holliday junctions using single-molecule spectroscopy. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2004;341:739–751. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.06.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kallenbach NR, Ma RI, Wand AJ, Veeneman GH, van Boom JH, Seeman NC. Fourth rank immobile nucleic acid junctions. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1983;1:159–168. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1983.10507432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Seeman NC, Kallenbach NR. Design of immobile nucleic acid junctions. Biophys J. 1983;44:201–209. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(83)84292-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Seeman NC, Maestre MF, Ma RI, Kallenbach NR. Physical characterization of a nucleic acid junction. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1985;172A:99–108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Churchill ME, Tullius TD, Kallenbach NR, Seeman NC. A Holliday recombination intermediate is twofold symmetric. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988;85:4653–4656. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.13.4653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Li J, Kokkola R, Tabibzadeh S, Yang R, Ochani M, Qiang X, Harris HE, Czura CJ, Wang H, Ulloa L, et al. Structural basis for the proinflammatory cytokine activity of high mobility group box 1. Mol Med. 2003;9:37–45. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Palumbo R, Sampaolesi M, De Marchis F, Tonlorenzi R, Colombetti S, Mondino A, Cossu G, Bianchi ME. Extracellular HMGB1, a signal of tissue damage, induces mesoangioblast migration and proliferation. J Cell Biol. 2004;164:441–449. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200304135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hreggvidsdottir HS, Ostberg T, Wähämaa H, Schierbeck H, Aveberger A-C, Klevenvall L, Palmblad K, Ottosson L, Andersson U, Harris HE. The alarmin HMGB1 acts in synergy with endogenous and exogenous danger signals to promote inflammation. J Leukoc Biol. 2009;86:655–662. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0908548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Weir HM, Kraulis PJ, Hill CS, Raine AR, Laue ED, Thomas JO. Structure of the HMG box motif in the B-domain of HMG1. EMBO J. 1993;12:1311–1319. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05776.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ramakrishnan V, Finch JT, Graziano V, Lee PL, Sweet RM. Crystal structure of globular domain of histone H5 and its implications for nucleosome binding. Nature. 1993;362:219–223. doi: 10.1038/362219a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chow CS, Barnes CM, Lippard SJ. A single HMG domain in high-mobility group 1 protein binds to DNAs as small as 20 base pairs containing the major cisplatin adduct. Biochemistry. 1995;34:2956–2964. doi: 10.1021/bi00009a027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Schägger H, Jagow von G. Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa. Analytical Biochemistry. 1987;166:368–379. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90587-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Pace CN, Vajdos F, Fee L, Grimsley G, Gray T. How to measure and predict the molar absorption coefficient of a protein. Protein Sci. 1995;4:2411–2423. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560041120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bell T. Bell_DatainBrief. 2015 Submitted. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kallenbach NR, Ma R-I, Seeman NC. An immobile nucleic acid junction constructed from oligonucleotides. Nature. 1983;305:829–831. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Shida T, Iwasaki H, Shinagawa H, Kyogoku Y. Characterization and comparison of synthetic immobile and mobile Holliday junctions. J Biochem. 1996;199:653–658. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a021292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wu Q, Zhang W, Pwee K-H, Kumar PP. Rice HMGB1 protein recognizes DNA structures and bends DNA efficiently. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2003;411:105–111. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9861(02)00721-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zhang W, Wu Q, Pwee K-H, Jois SDS, Kini RM. Characterization of the interaction of wheat HMGa with linear and four-way junction DNAs. Biochemistry. 2003;42:6596–6607. doi: 10.1021/bi034280h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kypr J, Kejnovská I, Renčiuk D, Vorlíčková M. Circular dichroism and conformational polymorphism of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:1713–1725. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Howell LA, Waller ZAE, Bowater R, O’Connell M, Searcey M. A small molecule that induces assembly of a four way DNA junction at low temperature. Chem Commun (Camb) 2011;47:8262–8264. doi: 10.1039/c1cc12922h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ranjbar B, Gill P. Circular Dichroism Techniques: Biomolecular and Nanostructural Analyses- A Review. Chemical Biology & Drug Design. 2009;74:101–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0285.2009.00847.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wittung P, Eriksson M, Lyng R, Nielsen PE, Norden B. Induced Chirality in PNA-PNA Duplexes. J Am Chem Soc. 1995;117:10167–10173. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Xin H, Taudte S, Kallenbach NR, Limbach MP, Zitomer RS. DNA binding by single HMG box model proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:4044–4050. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.20.4044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Peffer NJ, Hanvey JC, Bisi JE, Thomson SA, Hassman CF, Noble SA, Babiss LE. Strand-invasion of duplex DNA by peptide nucleic acid oligomers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:10648–10652. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.22.10648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Frank-Kamenetskii MD, Mirkin SM. Triplex DNA structures. Annu Rev Biochem. 1995;64:65–95. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.64.070195.000433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Eriksson M, Nielsen PE. Solution structure of a peptide nucleic acid-DNA duplex. Nat Struct Biol. 1996;3:410–413. doi: 10.1038/nsb0596-410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Franklin RE, Gosling RG. The structure of sodium thymonucleate fibres. I. The influence of water content. Acta Cryst. 1953;6:673–677. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wang JC. Helical repeat of DNA in solution. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979;27:3466–3473. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kypr J, Chládková J, Zimulová M, Vorlickova M. Aqueous trifluorethanol solutions simulate the environment of DNA in the crystalline state. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:3466–3473. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.17.3466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Jayaram B, Sprous D, Young MA, Beveridge DL. Free Energy Analysis of the Conformational Preferences of A and B Forms of DNA in Solution. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:10629–10633. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.McConnell K, Beveridge D. DNA structure: what’s in charge? Journal of Molecular Biology. 2000;304:803–820. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Cooper JP, Hagerman PJ. Gel electrophoretic analysis of the geometry of a DNA four-way junction. Journal of Molecular Biology. 1987;198:711–719. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90212-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Murchie AI, Clegg RM, Kitzing von E, Duckett DR, Diekmann S, Lilley DM. Fluorescence energy transfer shows that the four-way DNA junction is a right-handed cross of antiparallel molecules. Nature. 1989;341:763–766. doi: 10.1038/341763a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Clegg RM, Murchie AIH, Zechel A, Carlberg C, Diekmann S, Lilley DMJ. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis of the structure of the four-way DNA junction. Biochemistry. 1992;31:4846–4856. doi: 10.1021/bi00135a016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Mao C, Sun W, Seeman NC. Designed Two-Dimensional DNA Holliday Junction Arrays Visualized by Atomic Force Microscopy. J Am Chem Soc. 1999;121:5437–5443. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Leijon M, Graeslund A, Nielsen PE, Buchardt O, Norden B, Kristensen SM, Eriksson M. Structural Characterization of PNA-DNA Duplexes by NMR. Evidence for DNA in a B-like Conformation. Biochemistry. 1994;33:9820–9825. doi: 10.1021/bi00199a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Bewley CA, Gronenborn AM, Clore GM. MINOR GROOVE-BINDING ARCHITECTURAL PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and DNA Recognition 1. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1998;27:105–131. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.27.1.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Connolly ML. Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids. Science. 1983;221:709–713. doi: 10.1126/science.6879170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Arnott S, Hukins DW. Optimised parameters for A-DNA and B-DNA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1972;47:1504–1509. doi: 10.1016/0006-291X(72)90243-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Arnott S, Hukins D. Refinement of the structure of B-DNA and implications for the analysis of X-ray diffraction data from fibers of biopolymers. Journal of Molecular Biology. 1973;81:93–105. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90182-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Trantírek L, Štefl R, Vorlíčková M, Koča J. An A-type double helix of DNA having B-type puckering of the deoxyribose rings. Journal of molecular …. 2000 doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES