Characteristics of Anaphylaxis in 907 Chinese Patients Referred to a Tertiary Allergy Center: A Retrospective Study of 1,952 Episodes

Abstract

Purpose

Comprehensive evaluation of anaphylaxis in China is currently lacking. In this study, we characterized the clinical profiles, anaphylactic triggers, and emergency treatment in pediatric and adult patients.

Methods

Outpatients diagnosed with "anaphylaxis" or "severe allergic reactions" in the Department of Allergy, Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 1, 2000 to June 30, 2014 were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

A total of 1,952 episodes of anaphylaxis in 907 patients were analyzed (78% were adults and 22% were children). Foods are the most common cause (77%), followed by idiopathic etiologies (15%), medications (7%) and insects (0.6%). In food-induced anaphylaxis, 62% (13/21) of anaphylaxis in infants and young children (0-3 years of age) were triggered by milk, 59% (36/61) of anaphylaxis in children (4-9 years of age) were triggered by fruits/vegetables, while wheat was the cause of anaphylaxis in 20% (56/282) of teenagers (10-17 years of age) and 42% (429/1,016) in adults (18-50 years of age). Mugwort pollen sensitization was common in patients with anaphylaxis induced by spices, fruits/vegetables, legume/peanuts, and tree nuts/seeds, with the prevalence rates of 75%, 67%, 61%, and 51%, respectively. Thirty-six percent of drug-induced anaphylaxis was attributed to traditional Chinese Medicine. For patients receiving emergency care, only 25% of patients received epinephrine.

Conclusions

The present study showed that anaphylaxis appeared to occur more often in adults than in infants and children, which were in contrast to those found in other countries. In particular, wheat allergens played a prominent role in triggering food-induced anaphylaxis, followed by fruits/vegetables. Traditional Chinese medicine was a cause of drug-induced anaphylaxis. Furthermore, exercise was the most common factor aggravating anaphylaxis. Education regarding the more aggressive use of epinephrine in the emergency setting is clearly needed.

INTRODUCTION

Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening, severe systemic allergic reaction of rapid onset.¹ Its incidence appears to be rising in some Western countries.² The symptoms of anaphylaxis are multi-systemic, involving the skin, and respiratory, gastrointestinal, and cardiovascular systems.¹ Triggers of anaphylaxis may show different patterns due to differences in living environment and genetic factors as well as patient selection (e.g., outpatients vs inpatients). Food is the most common trigger, especially in children.³,⁴ Studies in the US and Europe have shown that nuts, peanuts, fish, and shellfish are common food allergens,⁴,⁵,⁶ whereas in some Asian countries, buckwheat and wheat are more common food triggers.⁷,⁸ A number of studies conducted in the US and European countries have summarized the clinical characteristics of anaphylaxis.³,⁴,⁵,⁹,¹⁰ A few small studies conducted in Asia have also been published, e.g., South Korea⁸ and Hong Kong.¹¹ To better understand the features of anaphylaxis in Chinese patients, we analyzed 907 anaphylactic cases retrospectively between 2000 and 2014 using the criteria for anaphylaxis developed by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) in 2006.¹² In this study, we characterized the clinical profiles, anaphylactic triggers, and emergency treatment in pediatric and adults patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

Clinical data from patients diagnosed with 'anaphylaxis' or 'severe allergic reactions' from January 1, 2000 to June 30, 2014 was collected and analyzed by 3 allergists who specialized in anaphylaxis in the Department of Allergy, Peking Union Medical College Hospital. All anaphylaxis patients who were referred to our department experienced at least 1 anaphylactic reaction, and most of them had received emergency treatment in local hospitals when reactions occurred. They came to our hospital for confirming the triggers of their severe episodes. A total of 907 patients that met current criteria were included in this study. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking Union Medical College Hospital. All patients came from 31 provinces in China. Ninety-five percent were from northern China.

Clinical diagnostic criteria and severity grading

Assessment of the outpatients with anaphylaxis was based on the NIAID 2006 criteria¹² with slight modification. Anaphylaxis is most likely when any one of the following 3 criteria is fulfilled:

(1) 2 or more of the following that occur rapidly after exposure to a likely allergen (e.g., foods, drugs, and insects) for that patient, (i) involvement of the skin-mucosal tissue (e.g., generalized hives, itch-flush, and swollen lips-tongue-uvula), (ii) respiratory compromise (e.g., dyspnea, wheeze-bronchospasm, stridor, reduced peak expiratory flow rate, and hypoxemia), (iii) reduced blood pressure (BP) or associated symptoms (e.g., hypotonia, collapse, syncope, and incontinence), and (iv) persistent gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g., crampy abdominal pain, and vomiting);

(2) experiencing similar symptoms as above (skin-mucosal tissue symptoms, and respiratory compromise/reduced BP or associated symptoms) after exposure to the same allergen;

(3) patients have been diagnosed "anaphylaxis" by physicians, and receive treatment in a hospital emergency when severe reactions occur.

The severity was stratified into mild, moderate, or severe anaphylaxis during the chart review as previously described,³ and the patient population was divided into 2 groups according to the following definition:

(1) Mild to moderate anaphylaxis: Patients with cutaneous and angioedema symptoms with additional respiratory, and gastrointestinal features. The additional features included a history of shortness of breath or dyspnea, wheeze, hoarseness, and nausea or vomiting.

(2) Severe or life-threatening anaphylaxis: Patients with any of the findings listed for mild to moderate anaphylaxis and also with potential life-threatening symptoms or signs. These included 1 or more of the following: history of loss of consciousness, syncope, or dizziness, or light-headedness at any time; systolic BP <90 mmHg; Cardiovascular system collapse and/or neurologic dysfunction from hypoperfusion, or hypoxia. Also included were patients with 1 or more of the following: history of shortness of breath, wheeze, hoarseness or bronchospasm plus any 1 or more of stridor, cyanosis, or a respiratory rate ≥25/min.

Determination of triggers

Determination of food as the trigger for anaphylaxis was based on a clear history of anaphylaxis onset within hours of ingesting food, serum specific IgE (sIgE) testing (Phadia250 Detection System, ImmunoCAP, Phadia AB, Sweden) and/or skin prick testing. Serum sIgE levels >0.35 kU/L were considered positive, skin prick testing was performed as previously described.¹³ A diagnosis of anaphylaxis caused by insect bites or drugs was made based on a convincing history. If the medical history did not suggest a clear trigger and all allergen tests were negative, the event was diagnosed as idiopathic anaphylaxis. Due to the potential risks of triggering anaphylaxis with oral food or drug challenges, no such testing was performed.

Main outcomes and measures

Demographic data, clinical features, possible triggers, specific IgE of food triggers, and treatment before hospital visits or in emergency departments were characterized.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Continuous variables are expressed as the mean±standard deviation. Comparisons among groups were performed using ANOVA. Categorical variables are expressed as a percentage or ratio. Comparison between groups was performed using the chi-square and Fisher tests. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

General characteristics of anaphylaxis patients

Forty-five percent (412/907) of the patients were male. The average age of first anaphylactic reaction was 31±14 years (range, 5 months-75 years). The patients were divided into 5 age groups according to the age at onset of anaphylaxis (Table 1); 68% (1,333/1,952) of the first anaphylaxis occurred at the 18-50 year age range.

Table 1. Triggers of 1,952 anaphylactic reactions.

	Age at onset, year, mean (range)	Total, Number (%)	Age groups
			0-3 years n=21	4-9 years n=68	10-17 years n=336	18-50 years n=1,333	51-75 years n=194
Suspect triggers		1,952 cases of anaphylaxis of all causes
Food	30 (0.4-75)	1,501 (77)	21	61	282	1016	121
Drug	33 (4-61)	143 (7)	0	2	10	119	12
Insect	32 (21-45)	14 (1)	0	0	0	14	0
Idiopathic	36 (8-68)	294 (15)	0	5	44	184	61
Food triggers		1,501 cases of food-induced anaphylaxis
Cereals	34 (3-70)	622 (41)	1	6	80	465	70
Wheat	35 (7-70)	557 (37)	0	3	56	429	69
Other cereal		65 (4)	1	3	24	36	1
Fruits/vegetables	25 (4-75)	307 (20)	1	36	59	203	8
Tree nuts/seeds	32 (2-70)	107 (7)	3	3	11	80	10
Legume/peanut	28 (4-59)	75 (5)	0	4	20	42	9
Seafood	30 (8-59)	46 (3)	0	2	6	35	3
Milk	5 (0.4-24)	22 (1)	13	3	5	1	0
Spices	31 (7-59)	25 (1)	0	3	4	15	3
Other foods		35 (2)	3	0	7	21	4
Mix foods	28 (4-65)	93 (6)	0	2	21	63	7
Unclear	24 (4-67)	169 (12)	0	2	69	91	7
Drug triggers		143 cases of drug-induced anaphylaxis
Herb	31 (4-57)	53 (37)	0	1	4	46	2
Antibiotic	34 (12-58)	35 (24)	0	0	3	27	5
NSAID	42 (18-61)	23 (16)	0	0	0	18	5
Immunotherapy	29 (7-50)	16 (11)	0	1	3	12	0
Other drugs		16 (11)	0	0	0	16	0

NSAID, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug.

Triggers

The triggers for the 1,952 anaphylactic reactions are shown in Table 1; 85% of the triggers could be determined, which included foods (77%), drugs (7%) and insects (0.6%). The triggers could not be determined for the remaining 15% of all reactions.

Common food triggers and profiles in 5 age groups

Among 1,501 food-related anaphylactic reactions, 1,239 involved a specific food, and 262 involved unclear or mixed foods (Table 1). The most common food allergen was wheat, causing 37% of food-induced anaphylaxis. Twenty percent of food-related anaphylactic reactions were caused by fruits/vegetables, and the most common fruit was peach. Only 5% of the food-induced anaphylactic reactions were caused by tree nuts/seeds, and the most common nut was cashew. There was 1 fatal anaphylaxis induced by cashew, and the patient was male, at 75 years of age. Legume/peanut triggered 7% of food reactions. Eighty-five percent of the patients with food-induced anaphylaxis were tested for sIgE. Table 2 shows the mean levels of sIgE to common food triggers.

Table 2. Levels of specific IgE of 10 common food-triggers in food-induced anaphylactic reactions.

Food triggers		sIgE (kU/L)
		Median	Range
Wheat, n=274	Wheat	3.11	0-100
	Gluten	4.5	0-100
	ω-5 gliadin	9.7	0-61.5
Bckwheat, n=31		33.3	0.89-100
Peach, n=24		17.6	1.34-44.8
Apple, n=20		7.9	0.38-54.9
Walnut, n=7		9.8	2.38-20.2
Cashew, n=8		19.3	1.32-57.8
Hazel nut, n=7		8.9	0.41-22.6
Peanut, n=8		5.7	0.4-19.1
Shrimp, n=16		4.9	0.42-22.7
Milk, n=15		70	16.7-100

N, number; sIgE, specific IgE.

Fig. 1 shows different patterns of food triggers stratified in 5 age groups. Milk was the key trigger of anaphylaxis in the infants (62%,12/21) and young children (0-3 years; 59%, 36/61), In children (4-9 years) with anaphylaxis, 59% (36/61) episodes were triggered by fruits/vegetable, and in the teenager (10-17 years), 20% (56/282) of the anaphylactic reactions were trigged by wheat. Wheat was the leading cause of the anaphylactic reactions in adults, 42% (429/1,016) anaphylactic reactions were triggered by wheat.

Fig. 1. Age-related food trigger patterns. Five age groups based on the onset age.

China-specific and rare food triggers

Anaphylaxis induced by China-specific food included consumption of chrysanthemum tea in 6 episodes, bullfrogs in 4 episodes, silkworm chrysalis in 1 episode, locusts in 2 episodes, and cicada in 2 episodes.

Pollen sensitization patterns in food-induced anaphylaxis

Mugwort pollen sensitization is common in patients with anaphylaxis induced by fruits/vegetables, legume/peanuts, tree nuts/seeds, and spices, with the prevalence rate of 67%, 61%, 51%, and 75%, respectively (Fig. 2). Among 24 peach-related anaphylaxis cases, 17 (71%) were allergic to mugwort.

Fig. 2. Pollen sensitization profile in food-induced anaphylaxis patients.

Drug triggers

Seven percent (143/1,952) of the anaphylactic reactions were induced by drugs. Herbs (37% of the culprit drugs) were the most common drug trigger, in which Qingkailing (14 anaphylactic reactions) was the leading cause. Antibiotics were the second most frequent drug trigger, causing 24% of drug-induced anaphylactic reactions, and 36% of these antibiotic reactions were induced by penicillin. Sixteen percent of drug-induced reactions were triggered by antipyretics and analgesics (Table 1).

Severity of anaphylaxis

We reviewed 1,952 anaphylactic reactions. Of these anaphylactic reactions, 906 were severe, potentially life-threatening anaphylaxis, with the mean onset age being 34 years, which was significantly different from the mean onset age of 27 years for 986 mild-to-moderate anaphylaxes (P<0.001). Fifty-seven percent of the severe episodes in food anaphylaxis were triggered by wheat, whereas fruits and vegetables tended to trigger mild/moderate reactions (P<0.001) (Table 3).

Table 3. Severity of anaphylaxis and potential risk factors.

Severity	Mild/moderate n=986	Severe n=966	P value Mild/moderate vs severe
Age, year, mean (SD)	27 (14)	34 (14)	<0.001
Triggers	n (%)a	n (%)b
Food	764 (77)	737 (76)	0.533
Drug	69 (7)	74 (8)	0.575
Insect	4 (0.4)	10 (1)	ND
Idiopathic	149 (15)	145 (15)	0.95
Food triggers	n (%)c	n (%)d
Wheat	138 (18)	419 (57)	<0.001
Fruits/vegetables	236 (31)	71 (10)	<0.001
Legume/peanut	52 (7)	23 (3)	0.001
Tree nuts/seeds	77 (10)	30 (4)	<0.001
Seafood	20 (3)	26 (4)	0.334
Milk	16 (2)	6 (1)	ND
Spices	19 (2)	6 (1)	ND

Bold denotes a significant P value.

a, among 986 cases of mild/moderate anaphylaxis; b, among 966 cases of severe anaphylaxis; c, among 764 cases of mild/moderate food-induced anaphylaxis; d, among 737 cases of severe food-induced anaphylaxis.

N, number; ND, Not different.

Recurrent anaphylaxis

In total, 1,952 episodes in 907 patients with anaphylaxis were recorded in charts, wherein 324 (36%) patients were seen after their first episode by physicians and the remaining 593 patients (64%) experienced more than 1 previous episode before clinic visit. In total, the 907 patients had an average of 2.4±2.2 (range 1-40) anaphylaxis episodes, and 17 patients experienced more than 10 previous episodes. Table 4 shows characteristics of the 17 patients with more than 10 anaphylactic reactions before their visits.

Table 4. Characteristics of patients with recurrent anaphylaxis (more than 10 episodes) before their visits.

Case no.	Sex	Age at visit, year	Age at onset, year	Previous episodes	Characteristics of episodes	Triggers	Baseline tryptase	Other diseases
1	F	7	0.5	10	U, angioedema, SOB, wheezing	Milk	ND	Drug allergy
2	F	41	34	>30	U, SOB, LOC, hypotension. All episodes occurred after mild exercise	Wheat	ND	AR
3	F	30	28	>10	U, laryngeal edema, hypotension, LOC (1 episode)	Wheat	ND	None
4	M	31	27	>10	U, rhinorrhea, sneezing, wheezing, SOB, vomiting, LOC (1 episode)	Multi-food allergy (peanut, soy bean, cabbage, broccoli)	1.71	AR (mugwort and ragweed allergy)
5	F	36	36	10	U, laryngeal edema, SOB	Idiopathic	ND	None
6	F	14	13	>10	U, swelling of face, wheezing, SOB, vomiting, tachycardia;	Buckwheat	ND	None
7	M	60	46	>10	U, SOB, LOC, hypotension, loss of sphincter control	Wheat	ND	CVD
8	M	65	45	30-40	laryngeal edema, SOB, swelling of lips and tough	iIdiopathic	ND	Drug allergy, hypertension
9	F	34	30	>15	U, swelling of palm, cramping abdominal pain, diarrhea, SOB, sweating, feeling faint	Multi-food allergy (wheat, barley, oat, maize, rice, buckwheat, tomato)	ND	None
10	M	46	35	>10	U, SOB, abdominal pain, loss of sphincter control; episodes occurred after moderate exercise	Wheat	ND	None
11	F	64	53	>10	U, throat tightness, sweating, nausea, vomiting, feeling faint, LOC	Wheat	ND
12	M	52	38	>10	U, vomiting, diarrhea, dizziness, SOB, laryngeal edema. Episodes occurred after exercise	Wheat	ND	Drug allergy
13	M	24	13	>20	U, swelling of lips and eye, LOC, hypotension, SOB, tachycardia, nausea, vomiting	Wheat	ND	eczema
14	F	52	26	10	U, nausea, SOB, loss of sphincter, LOC	Wheat	ND	None
15	F	58	54	>40	U, swelling of face , SOB, tachycardia, LOC, loss of sphincter	Idiopathic	ND	CVD
16	F	44	38	>10	U, LOC	Wheat	ND	None
17	M	24	18	>40	U, LOC, vomiting, cramping abdominal pain	Wheat	ND	None

N, not done; U, Urticaria; LOC, loss of consciousness; SOB, short of breath; AR, allergic rhinitis; CVD, cardiovascular diseases.

Exercise was the most common co-factor

Among the 1,952 anaphylactic reactions, 39% (761/1,952) occurred during exercise, 3.7% after orally taking aspirin, 1.4% occurred after alcohol consumption, 1.1% after taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) other than aspirin. Exercise involved in episodes triggered by foods (662/761, 87%) as a co-factor, and among these food- and exercise-dependent anaphylactic episodes, wheat was the leading food trigger (397/662, 60%).

Treatment of anaphylaxis

Table 5 summarizes the treatment of the 1,467 anaphylactic reactions. No treatment records were available for 485 anaphylactic reactions. Among the 1,467 anaphylactic reactions with medical records, 11% resolved spontaneously, and 10% were treated at home; and 87% of those home-treated reactions received antihistamines. Seventy-nine percent of the anaphylactic reactions were treated in the emergency department. No emergency treatment records were available for 45% (521/1,161) of these reactions. Among the 640 with emergency treatment records, 72% were treated with corticosteroids and only 25% were treated with epinephrine; only 34% of the life-threatening reactions were treated with epinephrine.

Table 5. Emergency treatment of 1,467 anaphylactic reactions.

Treatment	Total n=1,467	Mild/moderate n=631	Severe n=836	P value Mild/moderate vs severe
	n (%)a	n (%)b	n (%)c
Self-relief	160 (11)	95 (15)	65 (8)	<0.001
Treatment at home	146 (10)	107 (17)	39 (5)	<0.001
Treatment in ED	1,161 (79)	429 (68)	732 (87)	<0.001
Management at home	n (%)d	n (%)e	n (%)f
Oral antihistamines	128 (87)	94 (88)	34 (87)	0.914
Oral corticosteroid	7 (5)	6 (6)	1 (3)	ND
Anti-asthmatic	6 (4)	2 (2)	2 (5)	ND
Others	6 (4)	3 (3)	3 (8)	ND
Management in ED	n (%)g	n (%)h	n (%)i
Corticosteroids	461 (72)	174 (77)	287 (69)	0.118
Epinephrine	163 (25)	23 (10)	140 (34)	<0.001
Antihistamines	155 (24)	66 (29)	89 (22)	0.045
Calcium gluconate	100 (15)	39 (17)	61 (15)	0.422
Anti-asthmatic	24 (4)	11 (5)	13 (3)	0.28
Dopamine	20 (3)	0	20 (5)	ND
Vitamin C	21 (3)	10 (4)	11 (3)	ND
Others	15 (2)	4 (2)	11 (3)	ND

a, among 1,467 cases of total anaphylaxis; b, among 631 cases of mild/moderate anaphylaxis; c, among 836 cases of severe anaphylaxis; d, among 146 home-treated cases of anaphylaxis; e, among 107 home-treated cases of mild/moderate anaphylaxis; f, among 39 home-treated cases of severe anaphylaxis; g, among 640 ED-treated cases of anaphylaxis; h, among 227 ED-treated cases of mild/moderate anaphylaxis; i, among 413 ED-treated cases of severe anaphylaxis Bold denotes a significant P value.

n, number; ED, emergency department; ND, Not different.

Clinical symptoms and signs

The most commonly involved areas were the skin, subcutaneous tissues, and mucosa (95%). Skin symptoms were most common (78.2%), followed by respiratory tract symptoms (64.2%). Six reactions were associated with apnea. Of the 1,467 anaphylactic reactions, 56.8% had associated cardiovascular system involvement and 38.7% had gastrointestinal symptoms. Only 0.5% of the anaphylactic reactions presented as a biphasic reaction. The most common first symptom was skin (75%), followed by respiratory (16%), and gastrointestinal symptoms (7%).

DISCUSSION

This is the largest investigation concerning pediatric and adult patients with anaphylaxis in a single allergic clinic in China. Most of the prevalence data published previously regarding anaphylaxis came mainly from the emergency patients and inpatients in general and children hospitals.³,⁴,⁵,⁸,⁹,¹⁰,¹¹,¹⁴,¹⁵ This study involved outpatients in our clinic, the biggest allergy center in China, which serves patients with allergic diseases in both adults and children from all over China.

The results of our investigation showed that the prevalence of anaphylaxis was higher in adults than in children, with the age group (18-50 years) being the most prevalent (68%). As a corollary, a hospital-based epidemiologic study from Korea⁸ showed that there was only 1 case (0.7%) in the children group (0-9 years) among 138 anaphylaxis patients, whereas the adult group (20-49 years) accounted for 54%. Also, anaphylaxis in children with low prevalence (2.5 per 100,000 children) was also observed in a Singapore hospital-based study. This significant adult dominance in the current study and some Asian countries like South Korea were significantly different from those of Western countries¹⁶,¹⁷ which showed that the incidence of anaphylaxis was highest among children and teenagers. In fact, we have conducted a population-based epidemiological study of 9 different allergic diseases, including anaphylaxis, throughout China in 2009, this epidemiological study (based on more than 130,000 general populations from 19 provinces in China) is expected to provide more accurate information on anaphylaxis in China. However, due to the small number of cases assessed by that epidemiological investigation, it would be difficult to show general characteristics of anaphylaxis in Chinese patients, so we conducted the present study for the purpose of investigating characteristic anaphylaxis in China.

Although there is no accurate data published, allergists and pediatricians in China perceived the prevalence of anaphylaxis, especially pediatric anaphylaxis to be lower than Western countries. There are numerous published studies on anaphylaxis in Chinese journals, and we searched some Chinese citation databases and found that approximately 129 anaphylaxis studies (including case reports and clinical studies) published in 2014; among them, there were only 4 studies regarding pediatric anaphylaxis, which partially reflected that the prevalence of anaphylaxis is lower in the pediatric population than in the adult population. This is similar to the prevalence rates of food allergy and other allergic diseases in Asian children, which is much lower than those in developed countries and shows a different profile. With the development of industrialization and modernization, it is suspected that allergic diseases, including anaphylaxis, will show a similarly increasing trend and prevalence as those noted in the developed countries in the past.

In our study, the most common trigger for anaphylaxis was food (77%), which was similar to the results of several other reports,⁴,⁵,⁶,⁹,¹⁸,¹⁹,²⁰ while 15.6% of the anaphylactic reactions in our patients had unknown causes, which was on a par with the literature reporting 0.2%-15% of anaphylactic reactions with unknown triggers.¹ Causes of anaphylaxis vary rather profoundly based on the geographical location and subject selection in previous studies. A study of patients from an outpatient allergy clinic in Central Europe²¹ showed that insect bites were the most common cause of anaphylaxis, while in South Korea, emergency patients had drugs as the most common cause.⁸ In comparison to studies from other countries, we observed unique patterns of food-induced anaphylaxis for Chinese patients. Wheat was the most common food to trigger anaphylaxis (37% of the food triggered episodes). To our knowledge, such a high proportion has not yet been reported in Western countries, which may be related to the lack of "gluten-free" products in China, and genetic factors may also contribute to the difference. Cai et al,²² suggested that the IL-4-C590T variant is associated with the susceptibility of wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis in a Chinese population, although this awaits further confirmation.

Fruits and vegetables were the second most common food triggers (20% of the food-induced anaphylactic reactions). The proportion of anaphylaxis induced by fruits and vegetables has been reported to vary from 9% to 20%.⁵,⁶,²⁰,²⁵

In contrast to North American countries where peanut was an important trigger, only 1.2% of the food-induced anaphylactic reactions in our study population were triggered by peanut. Similar findings have been reported from several Asian countries, including South Korea⁸,²⁶ and Singapore.²⁷

Diets in different parts of China vary widely, and foods unique to an area have been associated with the occurrence of anaphylaxis. For example, fried insects (silkworm chrysalis, locust, and cicada), chrysanthemum tea, edible potherb, bullfrogs, and turtles are considered delicacies in some geographical areas and may trigger anaphylaxis. Similarly, "bird's nest," a local delicacy in Singapore, was reported to induce anaphylaxis.²⁷

The nature of the food allergen-induced anaphylaxis varied among different age groups. Milk was the most common food trigger in infants (0-3 years of age). Fruits were the most common food trigger in children (4-9 years of age). Wheat was the leading food trigger in teenagers (10-17 years of age) and adults (≥18 years of age). This pattern is different from other countries and regions. The most common food allergen in children from the US,²⁵ Canada,⁴ and European countries⁹,²⁰ is peanut. In adult population in the U.S.⁵ and Hong Kong,¹¹ shellfish is the most common food trigger. An Italian group²⁰ found that fruits and vegetables are the most common food allergen causing anaphylaxis in adults. Differences in food allergens are related not only to local diets, environment, and genetic factors, but also to differences in patient source and study methods.

The current study showed that mugwort sensitization was common in patients with specific food-induced anaphylaxis, especially in fruits/vegetables (67%) and spices (75%). Mugwort is the most important allergenic pollen allergen in late summer and autumn in China.²⁸ A comprehensive review also revealed that common mugwort pollen-food syndromes include mugwort-spice syndrome and mugwort–peach association.²⁹ We found that in patients with peach-related anaphylaxis, 71% were also allergic to mugwort pollen. Ma et al.³⁰ recently reported that mugwort pollen sensitization was more frequently seen in symptomatic patients to peach compared to those noted in asymptomatic ones.

The proportion of drug-induced anaphylaxis was relatively low, with only 9% in our study population. This may be related to the fact that the patients included in this study were recruited from the outpatients in Allergy clinic, because the studies based on emergency department and hospitalized patients found that the proportion of drug-induced anaphylaxis was 26.9%-53%.⁹,¹⁴,¹⁵ It is worth noting that in the present study, traditional Chinese medicine was a major drug allergen, while other studies have reported that antibiotics and NSAIDs were the leading drug allergens.⁶,⁹,¹¹,¹⁴,¹⁵ The large number of anaphylactic reactions attributed to traditional Chinese medicine may be related to the fact that Chinese herbs are commonly used in primary Chinese hospitals. A total of 13 herbs were found to induce anaphylaxis in the current study. The most common triggers were injections of Qingkailing, Shuanghuanglian, and Houttuynia. These findings are consistent with those of Cao et al.³¹ who reported that 288 anaphylaxis cases were due to herb injections, among which 13 were fatal. In June 2006, the China Food and Drug Administration issued a temporary emergency suspension on the use of Houttuynia injection due to many related cases of anaphylaxis. Formulation of herb injections is relatively complex, and mechanisms underlying anaphylaxis triggered by herbs are currently unclear.

Only 0.6% of the anaphylactic reactions are triggered by insect bites, which are notably lower than those reported in the literature.⁴,⁶,⁸,⁹,¹⁴,¹⁸ A study from Central Europe²¹ found that 50% of the anaphylactic reactions were caused by insect bites, which are the most common cause of anaphylaxis. A study of children and teenagers in Germany¹⁸ found that bee venom (24%) was the second most common cause of anaphylaxis. A possible reason for this is that in China, patients with insect-induced anaphylaxis are preferentially referred to emergency department rather than to allergy clinics for treatment.

Seventy percent of our patients with anaphylaxis were treated with glucocorticoids, and epinephrine was used in only 26% of cases. Only 32% of severe cases received epinephrine. A relatively lower percentage (7.4%) was reported in Korean adults with anaphylaxis.³² By contrast, a study conducted in the US³ reported that 79% of the anaphylaxis patients receive epinephrine. Our findings revealed that many Chinese doctors lack a full understanding of anaphylaxis. Training and education should be provided to doctors, patients, and their families, so that they recognize the importance of epinephrine in anaphylaxis treatment. In our study, 11% of the anaphylactic reactions resolved spontaneously, including 9% of severe cases. A study of anaphylaxis in German children¹⁹ also found that 8% of severe cases resolved spontaneously. This suggests that anaphylaxis may be self-limiting; however, this does not mean the treatment of anaphylaxis should be delayed.

The present study suggested that wheat was a potential risk factor for life-threatening and recurrent anaphylaxis. As a corrolary, Mullins et al.,³³ suggested that the highest risk of recurrence was associated with sensitivity to wheat. In the current study, wheat was found as a trigger in 10 (12%) of the anaphylaxis patients. Wheat allergy, especially wheat-induced anaphylaxis, is difficult to diagnose and currently clinically underestimated in China. Some patients were referred to our clinics with previous diagnosis with "idiopathic anaphylaxis." Jia et al.²⁴ reported the first 15 Chinese cases of wheat-induced exercise-induced anaphylaxis in 2009. Complete abstinence from wheat products may be required in such cases. Accidental ingestion of wheat products or wheat allergens hidden in other food may induce recurrent anaphylaxis.

Exercise was the most common factor for aggravating anaphylaxis in our study. Forty percent of the anaphylactic reactions occurred during exercise. This finding is consistent with that of a previous study on anaphylaxis in children and teenagers in Europe.¹⁸ Seventy-four percent of the wheat-induced anaphylactic reactions were found to occur during exercise. A previous study from Japan found that wheat is the main food allergen in food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis.³⁴

The strengths of this study are that the subjects were recruited from an allergy clinic compared to evaluations of emergency department patients and inpatients, and that physicians in the allergy department could more accurately determine the cause of anaphylaxis and keep more detailed records of previous reactions. A limitation of this study is that all the data presented were collected retrospectively and thus prone to reporting bias.

CONCLUSION

The present study showed that anaphylaxis appeared to occur more often in adults than in infants and children in the Chinese population. The most common cause of anaphylaxis was food, particularly wheat. Anaphylaxis induced by fruits/vegetables was also important. Traditional Chinese medicine was the most common drug allergen. Epinephrine was administered in only a small number of cases. The current status of emergency treatment for anaphylaxis in China is not adequate.