Abstract
Today, the average life expectancy in developed nations is over 80 years and climbing. And yet, the quality of life during those additional years is often significantly diminished by the effects of age-related, degenerative diseases, including age-related macular degeneration (AMD), the leading cause of blindness in the elderly worldwide. AMD is characterized by a progressive loss of central vision attributable to degenerative and neovascular changes in the macula, a highly specialized region of the ocular retina responsible for fine visual acuity. Estimates gathered from the most recent World Health Organization (WHO) global eye disease survey conservatively indicate that 14 million persons are blind or severely visually impaired because of AMD. The disease has a tremendous impact on the physical and mental health of the geriatric population and their families and is becoming a major public health burden.
Currently, there is neither a cure nor a means to prevent AMD. Palliative treatment options for the less prevalent, late-stage ‘wet’ form of the disease include anti-neovascular agents, photodynamic therapy and thermal laser. There are no current therapies for the more common ‘dry’ AMD, except for the use of antioxidants that delay progression in 20%–25% of eyes. New discoveries, however, are beginning to provide a much clearer picture of the relevant cellular events, genetic factors, and biochemical processes associated with early AMD. Recently, compelling evidence has emerged that the innate immune system and, more specifically, uncontrolled regulation of the complement alternative pathway plays a central role in the pathobiology of AMD. The complement Factor H gene—which encodes the major inhibitor of the complement alternative pathway—is the first gene identified in multiple independent studies that confers a significant genetic risk for the development of AMD. The emergence of this new paradigm of AMD pathogenesis should hasten the development of novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for this disease that will dramatically improve the quality of our prolonged lifespan.
Keywords: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), basal laminar deposit (BLamD), Bruch’s membrane, choroidal neovascularization, complement Factor B (BF), complement Factor H (CFH), drusen, epidemiology, genetics, geographic atrophy, inflammation, surgery
Introduction
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), the leading cause of worldwide blindness in the elderly, is a bilateral ocular condition that affects the central area of retina known as the macula. The macula—which derives its name from the deposition of xanthophyll pigments—is located temporal to the optic disc and is bounded by the temporal superior and inferior vascular arcades (Figures 1 and 20). Although the macula comprises only 4% of retinal area, it is responsible for the majority of useful photopic vision. The fovea lies at the center of the macula and is approximately 2 mm in diameter (Figures 1, 2 and 20). This region contains the highest density of cone photoreceptor cells and is the only region of the retina where 20/20 vision is attainable. Although the macula is only 6 mm in diameter, it accounts for almost 10% of the entire visual field. Thus, lesions developing in this region can have a major impact on visual function.
AMD has a tremendous impact on the physical and mental health of members of the geriatric population and their families. Prior to 1990, AMD of all forms was often referred to as ‘senile macular degeneration’ or SMD, a reflection of the fact that the vision loss associated with AMD manifests late in life when most affected individuals are looking forward to enjoying retirement activities and maintaining independence. Instead, millions with AMD suffer bilateral central vision loss such that they can no longer drive, read a newspaper, prepare meals, or enjoy recreational activities. For many patients, the visual impairment associated with AMD means a loss of independence, depression, increased financial concerns and the need to adapt to vision loss at a time when co-morbid conditions often make such adaptation difficult or impossible (1–5).
The cost to society is only now being appreciated. A recent analysis of AMD in Australia predicts that the disease costs $2.6 billion per year (6). This is projected to grow to $6.5 billion by 2025, a total cost of $59 billion over the next 20 years. A treatment that reduced the progression by only 10% would save Australia $5.7 billion over that same period of time. Similar analyses for the United States are lacking, but given the demographics and higher cost of medical care in the US, the costs would be projected to as much as 20-fold higher.
Clinically, AMD is classified into the nonexudative ‘dry’ or atrophic form and the exudative ‘wet’ or neovascular form. More severe vision loss is typically associated with the ‘wet’ form that occurs in about 15% of all patients with AMD, but up to 20% of legal blindness from AMD is due to the atrophic form (7).
This article reviews the epidemiological, clinical, and underlying genetic and pathological manifestations of AMD.
Clinical aspects of AMD
Epidemiology
AMD is the leading cause of blindness in the elderly worldwide, affecting 30–50 million individuals. World Health Organization (WHO) statistics from the most recent WHO global eye disease surveys conducted in 2002 revealed that 8.7% of worldwide blindness is due to AMD, the third leading cause of worldwide blindness after cataract and glaucoma. Conservatively, the WHO estimated that 14 million persons worldwide are blind or severely visually impaired because of AMD (8,9). The majority of these impaired individuals and the millions more who are visually impaired from this condition live in developed countries.
The Beaver Dam Eye Study, a large population-based study, revealed that the prevalence of large extracellular ocular deposits known as drusen, a hallmark sign of AMD, is 2% in persons 43–54 years of age and 24% in persons over 75 years of age in the United States (10). Data from a number of large epidemiological studies indicate that almost one in three people over the age of 70 have early stages of AMD and that the incidence of the more severe forms of the disease increases from less than 1% in people under 65 years of age to over 25% in the 90 plus age group (11–13).
The Age-related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) found that 20.2% of individuals with early stage AMD progressed to advanced disease over a 5-year period, a rate of 4.0% per year. Similar annual rates of progression, between 2.5% and 4.8%, were reported in the Rotterdam Study and Blue Mountains Eye Study (BMES) (14,15). A recent report by Taylor and colleagues estimates that the progression rate for mild to moderate visual impairment is approximately 32%, and the rate from moderate to severe visual impairment is 46%, based upon the 2–3-year progression data derived from the Macular Photocoagulation Study (MPS), the Treatment of AMD with Photodynamic Therapy (TAP) study and the Vertiporfin in Photodynamic Therapy (VIP) study (6). These rates are slightly higher than the rates of 16% and 17% per annum reported by the MVIP study. Taylor also showed that the incidence of mild visual impairment in individuals who are 40 years and older is 0.10% per year; and, for moderate and severe visual impairment in this same group, it is 0.04% and 0.11% per year, respectively. However, as life expectancies increase in all parts of the world the prevalence of AMD will increase. It is likely that in the next few decades, tens of millions of people worldwide will suffer legal blindness or severe visual impairment from AMD (16–24).
Given the enormous impact of AMD on an aging population, much public interest and research has been focused on this condition in the past decade. Recent advances in the treatment of the ‘wet’ or neovascular form of the disease provide new treatment options for those who already suffer from AMD. Moreover, recent groundbreaking discoveries of the genetic allelic variations that predispose individuals to the disease provide the opportunity to develop methods of preclinical diagnosis and preventive therapies for early stage disease.
Clinical presentation of AMD
Although autopsy studies have documented histological and ultrastructural changes associated with AMD in the retina, retinal pigment epithelium, choriocapillaris and choroid in middle age (see below), the disease typically does not manifest clinically before age 55 (10). AMD is generally thought to progress along a continuum from atrophic or ‘dry’ AMD to neovascular ‘wet’ AMD with approximately 10%–15% of all AMD patients eventually developing the wet form. Occasionally patients with no prior signs of dry AMD present with exudative changes as the first manifestation of the condition. The pathognomonic clinical sign of ‘dry’ AMD is pigment disruption and drusen—small yellowish deposits observed on fundus examination. Drusen may be small ‘hard’ (small with discrete margins) or ‘soft’ (larger with indistinct edges) (Figures 3–7). They lie between the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and an adjacent basement membrane complex known as Bruch’s membrane (Figures 21, 23–24). Geographic atrophy (GA) and RPE changes are also observed in dry AMD (Figures 8–9). Several classification schemes have been developed that subdivide dry AMD into categories based on the number and size of drusen, amount of GA and degree of pigmentary changes in the macula (25–28).
The designation of exudative or ‘wet’ AMD implies that fluid, exudates and/or blood are present in the extracellular space between the neural retina and the RPE (i.e. the subretinal space) and/or, as in the case of RPE detachments, between the RPE and Bruch’s membrane (i.e. the sub-RPE space). Angiography using sodium fluorescein dye is commonly performed when signs of AMD are observed and exudative changes are suspected. Angiography can demonstrate ‘classic’ lacey vessels or more ‘occult’ leakage associated with fibrovascular tissue lying in the subretinal or sub-RPE space (Figures 10–15). The neovascular tissue associated with exudative AMD is most commonly referred to as choroidal neovascularization (CNV) because it originates from the normal choriocapillaris and extends through a dehiscence in Bruch’s membrane into the subretinal or sub-RPE space (Figures 25 and 29). Sometimes multiple soft drusen become confluent and create large pigment epithelial detachments (PEDs), which represent an elevation of the retinal pigment epithelium under the retina (Figures 16 and 17). Neovascularization associated with PEDs can be difficult to visualize clinically or image using fluorescein angiography; therefore, it is difficult to treat (29).
The natural history of dry AMD is progressive, with gradual loss of visual function that may span many years’ time. Many patients with dry AMD are asymptomatic and unaware of the disease. In 10%–15% percent of patients with dry AMD the deterioration is more rapid and extensive and they suffer significant vision loss due to geographic atrophy. In approximately 10%–15% of patients the condition progresses to the ‘wet’ or neovascular form. Left untreated, the natural history of wet AMD advances further to a cicatricial stage referred to as a disciform scar. This process usually takes place over several months and typically results in a 4–8-mm diameter fibrotic scar underlying the macula accompanied by a central scotoma with severe central vision loss in one eye (Figures 18 and 19). Patients with neovascular AMD in one eye have a 4%–12% per year cumulative risk of developing neovascular AMD in the fellow eye. Thus, the risk of bilateral loss of central vision is high in those with the neovascular form of the disease (30).
Therapeutics
A precise understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of AMD has proven to be elusive but it has only recently begun to be elucidated. As such, it is not surprising that the therapeutic approaches for AMD developed over the past 30 years have been of only limited benefit to most patients. Therapeutic interventions have focused almost exclusively upon the exudative ‘wet’ form that comprises approximately 10% of the AMD patient population because it is the most debilitating and rapidly progressive form of the disease. Until recently, such therapies have resulted in a benefit to less than 50% of patients with ‘wet’ AMD, and therefore less than 5% of all AMD patients. Efforts aimed at developing therapeutics to delay onset or progression of ‘dry’ AMD (or the conversion from ‘dry’ to ‘wet’ AMD) have proven even more difficult due to the long study duration and large numbers of participants required to achieve meaningful statistical results.
Over the last 30 years epidemiological studies have repeatedly identified four risk factors for AMD: age, cigarette smoking, increased body mass index, and inheritance (10,31,32). These same studies, as well as others, have produced conflicting information regarding the roles of dietary antioxidant supplementation and fat intake. In 1992 the Age-related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) group began enrolling subjects in a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study in which 4757 subjects aged 55–80 years with various stages of AMD were randomized to placebo or combinations of antioxidant therapy (33). Patients enrolled in the AREDS had either mild, moderate, or severe dry AMD in both eyes, or exudative AMD in one eye only. The study was designed to determine whether antioxidant therapy prevented vision loss, slowed the progression of dry AMD, or prevented conversion from dry to wet AMD. The results of 6.3 years of follow-up in the AREDS study were published in 2001 (33). The study results demonstrated that daily antioxidant therapy in the form of 15 mg beta carotene, 500 mg vitamin C, 50 mg vitamin E, 80 mg zinc (as zinc oxide), and 2 mg copper (as cupric oxide) daily was superior to a placebo in delaying progression of advanced dry AMD, and in slowing conversion from dry to wet AMD. Specifically, the odds ratio of progression to advanced AMD was decreased to 0.72 in the group who took the above combination of antioxidants as compared to placebo. No benefit of antioxidant supplementation was demonstrated in the milder forms of AMD. However, because the early stages of AMD often persist for many years, it is quite possible that the study design was not long enough to demonstrate a benefit to patients with milder stages of AMD. The AREDS was a landmark study in that it was the first and largest prospective randomized trial designed to analyze the effect of antioxidant supplementation on the progression of AMD.
Another therapeutic intervention that has been investigated for nonexudative AMD is prophylactic laser therapy for eyes with drusen. Three prospective trials, the Choroidal Neovascularization Prevention Trial (CNVPT), Complications of AMD Prevention Trial (CAPT) and Prophylactic Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Trial (PTAMD), evaluated the efficacy and safety of light macular grid laser in reducing the risk of developing CNV in eyes with drusen. The CNVPT and CAPT used argon laser and the PTAMD used an 810-nm diode laser (34–36). In both the CNVPT and PTAMD studies, grid laser treatment increased the risk of CNV. Therefore grid laser treatment of eyes with drusen is not recommended if the fellow eye has CNV (36,37). Recent results of the PTAMD bilateral drusen study arm with 639 subjects reported no decrease in CNV development but a four-letter gain in visual acuity in treated versus control eyes after 3 years of follow-up (38). The larger CAPT study of treatment of one eye in the setting of bilateral drusen is ongoing but near completion of 5 years of follow-up. Until the results of the CAPT study are known, prophylactic laser treatment of eyes with bilateral drusen is not a recommended therapy.
Therapy for exudative AMD has evolved from thermal laser photocoagulation in the early to mid 1980s, to photodynamic therapy for CNV beginning in 2000 and, most recently, to inhibition of vascular growth factors. The 3-year results of the Macular Photocoagulation Studies (MPS) for AMD was published in 1986 and demonstrated a benefit to thermal laser photocoagulation for ‘extrafoveal’ CNV located between 200 and 3,000 microns from the fovea. Subsequent MPS studies for juxtafoveal (1–200 microns from the fovea) CNV and subfoveal CNV, published in 1990 and 1991, respectively, demonstrated a benefit for laser treatment versus no treatment (39–41). However, visual loss was common even in those eyes with successful obliteration of CNV (42). Additionally, the closer the CNV was to the fovea, the poorer the visual outcome and the higher the rate of recurrence even in those who initially responded to treatment (43). In 1993, Freund and co-workers demonstrated that only 13% of new patients with exudative AMD (or approximately 1.3% of all AMD patients) met criteria for thermal laser treatment based on the MPS (44).
In the late 1980s to mid 1990s there was significant interest in vitreoretinal surgical approaches to exudative AMD. Variable success rates were reported in numerous small pilot trials of vitrectomy surgery with evacuation of subretinal blood and neovascular membranes. Trial designs were nonstandard, results were conflicting, and long-term follow-up in these pilot trials was lacking. Given the potential morbidity and expense of a major eye surgery, the National Eye Institute sponsored the prospective, randomized, controlled Submacular Surgery Trials (SST), two arms of which evaluated the safety and efficacy of removal of submacular CNV and blood in exudative AMD. The results of the SST for AMD demonstrated that surgery (as performed in the trial) did not increase the chance of stable or improved vision, and it prevented severe vision loss only in those eyes with large subretinal hemorrhages. Submacular surgery was also associated with high risk of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Given these results, submacular surgery is no longer recommended for exudative AMD (45,46).
Other surgical therapeutic modalities which have been investigated in small pilot trials are macular translocation, reported first by Machemer and Steinhorst, and limited macular translocation developed later by de Juan (47,48). The former technique involves creation of a total retinal detachment, while the latter is limited to a partial retinal detachment. Both techniques involve displacement of the macular retina from an area of CNV to a location where the retinal pigment epithelium is anticipated to be healthier. While pilot trials have suggested a benefit from these therapies for a small subset of patients, the morbidity of the major eye surgery involved in an elderly population, the lack of results from definitive prospective, randomized controlled trials, and the emergence of less invasive and more broadly applicable pharmacological therapies for exudative AMD have resulted in much less frequent application of macular translocation in recent years.
In 2000, photodynamic therapy with Visudyne™ (verteporfin), a light-activated compound, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for exudative AMD with predominately (>50%) classic, subfoveal CNV that was no larger than 5600 microns in diameter. FDA approval was based on the results of the Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Photodynamic Therapy Investigation (TAP) study. In the TAP study, subfoveal CNV was divided into subgroups based on initial visual acuity, lesion size, and fluorescein leakage characteristics: enrolled subjects were randomized to Visudyne™ or placebo (49). Photodynamic therapy involves intravenous administration of the photoactivatable compound, Visudyne™, followed 15 minutes later by irradiation of the CNV with a low-energy, nonthermal laser. Activated Visudyne™ generates singlet oxygen that damages the CNV endothelium resulting in thrombosis (50). In the TAP study an average of 3.5 treatments spaced at 3-month intervals were required to ablate the CNV, so the process is a lengthy one. Visual results, though better than with any prior treatment, were less than optimal with only 67% of treated patients with predominately classic CNV losing fewer than three lines of visual acuity (as compared to 39% of placebo treated eyes). At 1 year, 16% of Visudyne-treated patients gained one or more line of vision, and 15% of treated patients lost more than six lines of visual acuity. Over the course of the next several years, subgroup analysis of data from the TAP studies as well as additional trials with Visudyne™ treatment for lesions other than predominately classic CNV led to its application for other lesion types. However, the visualresults for lesions that were predominantly occult CNV were less favorable than those with predominately classic CNV (51,52).
Other ablative treatments for CNV include transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT) and radiation therapy. TTT utilizes low energy diode laser (810 nm) applied to the CNV slowly over 1 minute. Small pilot trials of TTT for occult CNV initially showed promise but a randomized, prospective clinical trial (TTT4 CNV) demonstrated no significant benefit. Similarly, low-dose radiation therapy for AMD was investigated in multiple small pilot trials with conflicting results (53–55). Although no definitive prospective clinical trial of radiation therapy for AMD has ever been conducted, the concept has become less popular in recent years, especially in light of the interest in pharmacological therapies for AMD.
The current era of therapy for exudative AMD utilizes pharmacologic administration of anti-neo-vascular agents periocularly or intraocularly. Studies implicating various cellular growth factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in a variety of ocular neovascular processes, have led to the development of VEGF inhibitors, VEGF antibodies and other ‘broad-spectrum’ antiangiogenic molecules that inhibit proangiogenic cytokines. In 2004, Macugen™ (pegaptanib sodium) was the first of the VEGF inhibitors to be approved by the FDA for exudative AMD. Pegaptanib is an aptamer which binds to the A isoform of VEGF-165 at its heparin binding site and prevents VEGF-165 from binding to its receptor on endothelial cells. Pegaptanib is administered by intravitreal injection (i.e. injected into the vitreous cavity of the eye) every 6 weeks for up to a 2-year course of therapy. Based on the Macugen™ study results of 1186 patients after 1 year of subjects treated with 0.3 mg pegaptanib, 70% lost fewer than three lines of vision compared to 55% of controls. The risk of severe vision loss (>6 lines of vision) was reduced from 22% in controls to 10% in treated subjects (56).
Another VEGF inhibitor undergoing clinical trials is Lucentis™. Lucentis™ is derived from the Fab fragment of an antibody to isoform A of VEGF. The fragment blocks VEGF binding to its receptor on endothelial cells, thus inhibiting its biological activity. The 2-year results of the ANCHOR trial were presented recently (57). The data demonstrated not only a preservation of vision in nearly 95% of patients treated with Lucentis™ (ranibizumab) at year one but, for the first time, an improvement in vision in a significant proportion of patients with exudative AMD. Lucentis™ was FDA-approved for the treatment of exudative AMD in June 2006.
Avastin™ (bevacizumab), a VEGF antibody derived from the same parent antibody as Lucentis™, is approved by the FDA to treat colon cancer and is gaining popularity as an ‘off-label’ intravitreal therapy for AMD. It is important to note that Avastin™ has not yet undergone the toxicity studies and controlled trials that are required by the FDA for ocular application (58,59). Other anti-angiogenic therapies currently under study include anecortave acetate (Retaane™)—an antiangiogenic steroid (60,61)—squalene, triamcinolone (which carries a significant risk of causing cataract and steroid-induced glaucoma) in combination with Visudyne™ photodynamic therapy (62,63), and various VEGF inhibitors that are in various stages of development.
One concern with all antiangiogenic agents is their potential for systemic inhibition that may produce cardiovascular or cerebrovascular complications, or inhibit wound healing. The immediate and long-term systemic effects of these drugs, especially those prescribed ‘off-label’, are largely unknown and difficult to determine in an elderly population already prone to vascular events. Additional drawbacks to the intravitreally administered therapeutics include patient discomfort, intraocular infection (endophthalmitis), retinal tear or detachment, and lens damage in phakic patients (64).
Recent discoveries of the role that inflammation plays in AMD pathogenesis (see below) has led to an interest in investigating the anti-inflammatory effects of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA reductase) inhibitors (statins) on AMD. Several clinical population-based studies of the effects of statins on AMD development and progression have yielded conflicting results (65). Thus, more studies in this area will be required to assess efficacy.
In the near future, therapy for exudative AMD will likely involve multiple anti-neovascular agents, possibly coupled with less frequent application of ablative therapies such as photodynamic therapy, in order to maximize the beneficial effects of each and minimize the frequency of adverse side effects. Further on the horizon are antiangiogenic agents in longer-acting forms that require less frequent administration. The ultimate therapy for AMD, however, will lie in preclinical identification of those who are genetically ‘at risk’ for the disease, coupled with preventative strategies that are designed to minimize or compensate for one’s genetic predisposition.
Pathobiology of early AMD
Overview
Until quite recently, the majority of research on AMD and the development of therapeutics for the disease have focused upon late-stage neovascular events. No clear-cut sequence for the initiation and progression of AMD has been identified that would allow it to be monitored and treated in its earliest stages. Moreover, the pathologic correlates of the different clinical phenotypes of AMD remain poorly understood, and there is a paucity of animal models that accurately mimic the characteristic features of the disease. Nevertheless, recent discoveries are beginning to provide a much clearer picture of the relevant cellular events, genetic factors, and biochemical processes that are associated with early AMD. This new information should hasten significantly the development of clinically effective diagnostics and therapeutics for the treatment of this devastating condition.
Morphological correlates of early AMD
From a histopathologic standpoint, the earliest detectable changes associated with AMD occur at the interface between the macular retina and the underlying layer of connective tissue known as the choroid (66–70). At this location lie the outer segments of rod and cone photoreceptors, the retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells, a stratified basement membrane complex termed Bruch’s membrane (BM), and the choroidal capillary bed or choriocapillaris (Figure 20).
The initial clinical diagnosis of early AMD is based on the funduscopic identification of drusen—the hallmark indicators of disease—and/or pigmentary changes in the macula. Drusen present fundus-copically as yellow-white deposits (Figures 3–7). They are extracellular deposits located between the retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) basal lamina and the inner collagenous layer of the elastin-containing Bruch’s membrane (Figures 22 and 23) (71). Macular drusen are classified using criteria that include size, shape and topographical location. These deposits are associated with an increased risk of visual loss that leads to end stage or late disease through either the growth of new blood vessels (choroidal neovascular membranes; Figures 25 and 29) that destroy the macula, or through the development of frank retinal atrophy (72–75).
Bruch’s membrane consists of an elastin core flanked on both sides by a collagenous layer and a basal lamina (Figures 20–29) (76–79). It is widely believed that the barrier properties of the RPE and BM limit cellular migration, especially the invasion of neovascular tissue from the choroid into the subretinal space. Our understanding of the molecular composition of BM, the molecular traffic that occurs across it, and the homeostatic mechanisms that maintain it, during normal aging as well as in AMD, is still rudimentary (80).
Links between AMD and structural abnormalities in BM have been documented in numerous histopathologic studies. Classically, these BM defects have been described as fragmentation or fracturing in association with calcification (81–85). Additional age-related changes in BM are typified by: 1) progressive thickening of the two collagenous layers; 2) modification and degeneration of collagen and elastin; 3) increased levels of advanced glycation end products, noncollagenous proteins and lipids; and 4) accumulation of several types of sub-RPE deposits (86–95). It has also been suggested that the age-related abnormalities in BM eventually lead to photoreceptor degeneration as a result of increased hydrophobicity, reduced permeability, and impaired nutrient exchange between the choroid and the RPE. Functionally, such changes result in an exponential reduction in the hydraulic conductivity of BM as a function of age (96–99). Much less is known about changes in BM hydraulic conductivity in individuals with AMD.
It has been proposed that topographic variations in BM may render the macula more susceptible to the ingrowth of new blood vessels from the choroidal vasculature that characterizes neovascular AMD. Morphometric data indicate that the elastic lamina of Bruch’s membrane in the macula is 3–6-fold thinner and 2–5-fold less dense relative to that in the mid-periphery in individuals of all ages (100). Elastin fiber destruction in the macula could also play a key role in the initiation of neovascular events because elastin degradation peptides are highly angiogenic and possess macrophage-recruiting activity (101,102).
In addition to drusen, basal laminar deposits (BLamD) and basal linear deposits (BLinD) accumulate within the extracellular environment of the RPE-choroid interface (Figures 21, 24, 28 and 29). These are identified based upon their morphological appearance and location. Both types of deposits have been proposed by various investigators to be involved in the pathogenesis of AMD (103). Neutral lipid (including esterified cholesterol) and apolipoproteins B and E are abundant in these basal deposits and in drusen, in the eyes of normal aged donors, as well as those with a history of AMD (88,94,104–107).
Basal laminar deposits (BLamD) that accumulate between the RPE basal plasma membrane and its basal lamina (Figures 21, 24 and 28) do not appear to be specific to or ‘diagnostic’ for AMD; however, there is a strong relationship between macular BLamD and exudative AMD, disciform scarring, and visual loss (74,84,108–114). BLamD-like deposits are also seen in other macular disorders with a clinical appearance similar to what is observed in AMD. These include Sorsby’s fundus dystrophy, late onset retinal degeneration (LORD), adult foveomacular pigment epithelial dystrophy and Malattia leventinese (115). The molecular composition and origin of BLamD have not yet been identified (116–118), but their morphological similarity to long-spacing collagen is striking. Electron microscopy has revealed that their banding pattern matches that of type VI collagen (119).
BLinD lie between the RPE basal lamina and the elastic layer of Bruch’s membrane (Figure 28). The principal component of BLinD is a distinct form of membranous debris, thought to be comprised primarily of lipoprotein particles containing neutral lipids, including esterified cholesterol. It is likely that BLinD are derived from local ocular sources (e.g. RPE cells) (120). BLinD were initially described by Sarks and colleagues (121) as lipid-like vesicles with varying diameters.
It is believed that the pigmentary changes often observed in the macula of AMD eyes are attributable to degenerative changes in the highly melanized RPE cells. This notion has gained wide acceptance because most of the early clinical signs and histopathological changes have been localized to this cell layer (122–125). It has long been recognized that the RPE is essential for the transport of ions, nutrients, and metabolites from the circulation to the neural retina and vice versa (126). A viable RPE is also essential for normal photoreceptor cell metabolism and functioning of the visual cycle. Therefore, it is not surprising that RPE degeneration is accompanied by concomitant photoreceptor degeneration. RPE dysfunction in the macula, whether caused by local environmental insults and/or genetic defect(s), would have a profound impact on the overlying photoreceptors and, therefore, on central vision. However, the nature of the insult(s) that causes RPE dysfunction has yet to be ascertained, although a variety of hypotheses has been advanced over the years including genetic factors, ischemia, oxidative stress, phagocytic overload, cigarette smoke, lipofuscin toxicity and, most recently, microbial infection (127–133).
The choriocapillaris has also been suspected to play a role in the etiology of AMD. The density and diameters of the choriocapillaris capillaries decrease with age, and this decrease is even greater in patients with AMD. The overall loss appears most marked in regions of geographic atrophy (134,135).
Physiological correlates of early AMD
There is substantial evidence of photoreceptor involvement in early AMD, particularly in those patients with soft or large drusen in the macula (136–144). Contrast sensitivity, the rate of recovery after photostress, the amplitude and latency of the foveal electroretinogram (ERG) response, and dark adaptation are all affected adversely in early AMD patients, including those with normal visual acuity (139,145–150). It has been shown that photoreceptor cells in areas impacted by drusen exhibit morphologic and biochemical signs of degeneration, including decreased expression of synapse-associated proteins and increased expression of stress-response molecules. There are also drusen-associated reductions in photoreceptor cell densities, thus suggesting that degenerative changes in photoreceptors ultimately lead to cell death (151,152).
Inflammation and AMD
Recent studies of the molecular composition of drusen have implicated local inflammation as a key element in the pathogenesis of AMD (153–159). Drusen contain numerous proteins related to the process of inflammation or its aftermath (106,160–163). In particular, many of these proteins are associated with the complement cascade and its regulation. Some of the proteinaceous components in drusen and the sub-RPE space are activated complement components and fragments associated with assembly of the membrane attack complex (MAC) (161,164–167). Other drusen components including vitronectin (160), clusterin, complement receptor 1 (CR1), and membrane cofactor protein (MCP-1) (163) are known complement regulatory proteins. Still others include known activators of the complement cascade including cholesterol (168), C-reactive protein (154), and the amyloidogenic peptide amyloid β (152,169). Metallic zinc, an amyloid β binding molecule, is also a drusen constituent (170). This compositional profile forms the basis for the conclusion that drusen are a manifestation of chronic, local inflammation at the level of Bruch’s membrane.
The complement system and AMD
Historically the immune system has been partitioned into the ‘innate’ and ‘adaptive’ systems. The innate system, an evolutionarily ancient system present in some form in all multicellular organisms, is designed to respond immediately to invading pathogens. In contrast, the adaptive system, which is specific to vertebrates, takes several days to mobilize T and B lymphocytes in order to contain an infection. As one arm of the innate system, the complement system of proteins is poised to recognize, attack and kill invading microorganisms (171–176). The complement cascade consists of the classical, alternative, and lectin activation pathways, which converge on a final common, or terminal, pathway. The complement system is part of a complex homeostatic mechanism that includes recognition and killing of microorganisms, removal of foreign particles and dead cells, recruitment and activation of inflammatory cells, regulation of antibody production and elimination of immune complexes. In addition to the 30 or more proteins that contribute to the complement cascade, there are numerous soluble and membrane-bound factors that help to modulate the system and play important roles in protecting host cells and tissues from complement attack.
The complement cascade is activated by an initiating event or ‘trigger’. The ‘trigger’ initiates a series of biochemical reactions that produce biologically active peptides and other molecules that generate inflammatory, immune, and physiological responses. The terminal pathway culminates in the assembly of a macromolecular complex known as the membrane attack complex (MAC). The MAC promotes cell lysis by the insertion of transmembrane pores, and the formation of additional byproducts through enzymatic cleavage. These byproducts have inflammatory, anaphylotoxic, and chemotactic properties, which can produce damage to both foreign pathogens and host cells.
Each of the three complement pathways can be distinguished by the nature of the ‘trigger’ that activates it. Typically, antigen-antibody binding triggers the ‘classical pathway’. In the ‘lectin pathway’, surface carbohydrate residues of invading pathogens serve as binding sites for the proinflammatory, acute phase proteins that trigger the cascade. A low level of spontaneous activation known as ‘tickover’ characterizes the ‘alternative pathway’, the most rudimentary and nonspecific pathway. This continuous background level of activation is amplified rapidly by the recognition of ubiquitous components present on the surfaces of many bacteria, viruses, as well as constituents present in cigarette smoke.
The complement system—and particularly the alternative pathway—plays a key role in tissue injury in ischemia, infection, and in a variety of disease processes (177). Under normal conditions, local complement activation is beneficial by promoting the rapid clearance of cell debris and facilitating the removal of toxic protein aggregates (178). Uncontrolled activation of this system, however, can seriously damage host cells and tissues and contribute significantly to disease progression (178–181). Activated components of the alternative pathway, for example, have been described in the pathology of glomerulonephritis, IgA nephropathy, asthma, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, myositis, inflammatory central nervous system diseases like multiple sclerosis, cardiac valvular disease, cirrhosis, adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), pemphigoid disease, and antiphospholipid syndrome (182–188). Thus, because of its spontaneous activating properties, continuous control of the alternative pathway is necessary to prevent damage to self tissues. This control can be severely affected by local changes in the concentrations of available components or impaired function of regulatory proteins that are attributable to acquired or genetic deficiencies.
Complement Factor H, the complement alternative pathway and AMD
Factor H is the main soluble inhibitor of the alternative pathway and, like most complement components, cells in the liver are responsible for 80%–90% of Factor H protein synthesis (189–191). Factor H inhibits C3 activation by binding to C3b, leading to its proteolytic cleavage and decay of the C3 convertase complex (C3bBb). It also competes with Factor B for surface-bound C3b, thereby conferring protection from membrane attack complex (MAC)-mediated attack. We now know that variants in the gene encoding Factor H play a central role in one’s susceptibility to AMD (see below). We also know from previous studies that individuals with mutations in the Factor H gene, or with autoantibodies that block Factor H function, are particularly susceptible to kidney disease that often leads to renal failure (181). However, it is not yet apparent how predicted functional alterations in the protein isoform encoded by the AMD risk-conferring Factor H gene variant lead to damage in the macula; nor is it known how the corresponding Factor B isoform produces the same net effect. Nevertheless, all of the available data are consistent with the conclusion that uncontrolled activation of the alternative pathway of complement at the level of Bruch’s membrane is a key element in the process of drusen formation and a major contributing factor to the pathogenesis of AMD.
Although the liver is responsible for most circulating Factor H, the eye is also capable of producing it as well as some other complement components. Not surprisingly, Factor H protein is also a molecular constituent of drusen (192). It co-localizes with its ligand C3b (a complement pathway component) in substructural spherules within drusen that contain amyloid β, further implicating these structures as candidate complement activators (169,193). Factor H and the MAC co-distribute in drusen and at the interface between the RPE and choroid. Finally, Factor H and C5b-9 (MAC) immunolabeling are more intense in the macula compared to tissues from more peripheral areas in the same eye (Hageman and Mullins, unpublished).
We have advanced a working model of AMD pathobiology based upon our studies (154,194) and the work of others (156,195). In this model, RPE atrophy and the subsequent deposition of cellular debris in the sub-RPE space are construed as a local pro-inflammatory ‘seeding’ event, leading to activation of the innate immune system at the RPE-choroid interface. Complement attack, in turn, induces significant bystander damage to macular cells and tissues, thus rendering them susceptible to additional RPE atrophy, photoreceptor degeneration and CNV.
Molecular genetics of AMD and disease associations
Overview
AMD is often regarded as a group of complex, late onset diseases modulated by the convergence of multiple risk factors (196,197). Family history is a consistent risk factor identified in most epidemiological studies of AMD conducted to date, and familial aggregation studies have shown that a genetic contribution is readily identified in up to 25% of AMD cases (198). Twin studies also support a genetic basis for the disease, with the concordance of clinical features (drusen and pigmentary changes) for both early and late onset disease being approximately twice as high in monozygotic (identical) twins compared to dizygotic (nonidentical) twins (199,200).
Linkage analysis and candidate gene screening have recently provided dramatic new insights into the molecular genetics of AMD (201–209). Genome-wide linkage analyses of extended families with AMD have identified a number of chromosomal loci that are linked to AMD. The most consistent of these occurs at chromosome 1q31 (210). Between 15% and 40% of multiplex AMD families segregated with a disease gene in the 1q31 region (204). Further analysis of this region revealed an allelic variant in exon 104 of the fibulin-6 gene (FBLN-6) in members of one AMD family, as well as in some sporadic AMD cases (211).
A number of other candidate genes have also been linked to AMD. Several of these associated with a small, but increased risk of developing AMD. However, most of these results have not yet been replicated in subsequent studies. These genes include ELOVL4 (212), VEGF, VLDLR, and LRP6 (213), FIBLN5 (214) and TLR-4 (215).
In contrast, the ε4 allele of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene has consistently been shown to be protective for AMD (216–218), whereas the ε2 allele appears to influence progression and to cause an earlier age of onset (218). Reliable association of a gene that confers increased risk for AMD, ABCA4, has also been reported and substantiated (219).
In early 2005, in a striking example of how disparate methods for gene discovery can be brought to bear on a single problem, four groups reported independently that common variants (single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)) in the gene encoding complement Factor H (CFH) confer major susceptibility to, or protection from, AMD (192,220–222). Individuals who possess a single copy of the risk-conferring CFH haplotype have 2–4-fold higher lifetime risk of developing AMD, and those with two copies possess a 5–7-fold higher lifetime risk. Haplotype analysis showed that a SNP in the CFH gene that results in a tyrosine to histidine substitution at amino acid 402 in the Factor H protein can account for up to 50% of AMD cases in the human population, a number approaching 50,000,000 worldwide. Follow-up reports have since confirmed these findings in additional cohorts in the United States (212,223), Iceland (224), the United Kingdom (225), and France (226). Interestingly, the major CFH risk haplotype in the Japanese population appears to be different than that reported in other populations, although the protective haplotype is the same (227).
In early 2006, allelic variants in two other complement-related genes, Factor B (BF) and complement component C2, were linked to AMD (228). These are paralogous genes located 500 bp apart on chromosome 6p21, and both reside in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class III region. BF is a component of the alternative pathway of complement, whereas C2 is a component of the classical pathway. Analysis of AMD-associated SNPs in these two genes identified a single ‘risk’ and two ‘protective’ haplotypes. Functional evidence suggests that the protective SNP possesses a glutamine (Q) in place of the more common arginine (R) at position 32 of the BF protein. There is evidence that this substitution may result in reduced alternative pathway-mediated hemolytic activity (229) and, therefore, a reduced overall propensity for overactivation of complement.
Combined analyses of CFH and BF haplotypes showed that the two variants together can account for nearly 74% of the risk of developing AMD. The protective haplotype for each of the three genes was completely absent in nearly 75% of all AMD cases, whereas 56% of controls possessed at least one copy of a protective CFH or BF haplotype. Approximately 60% of the risk in AMD cases, and 65% of the protection in controls, can be assigned to the CFH gene locus alone.
In addition to the 1q31 locus, a region on chromosome 10q26 has been identified in several recent studies that consistently showed linkage to AMD (210) on a scale similar to that of the CFH Tyr402His variant. PLEKHA1 (pleckstrin homology domain-containing, family A, member 1) and a predicted LOC387715 gene were identified as the relevant candidate genes at that locus (230). A subsequent study concluded that SNP rs10490924 in LOC387715 was the most likely AMD susceptibility allele (231). A third study identified a coding change in the LOC387715 gene as the significant allele that results in a nonsynonymous substitution of alanine to serine at position 69 of the hypothetical protein. The variant was found to be statistically independent of the increased risk conferred by the CFH allele, and of similar magnitude. In addition, a significant statistical relationship between the LOC387715 variant and a history of cigarette smoking has been found (232). Thus far, there is no published evidence for ocular expression of the LOC387715 gene product at either the RNA or protein levels, nor is there any indication of its likely functional properties.
Association of AMD with other diseases
The predicted complement-regulatory dysfunction associated with AMD is consistent with the pattern of complement-regulatory dysfunction in other diseases. Under normal conditions, local complement activation promotes the rapid clearance of cellular debris and facilitates removal of toxic protein aggregates. However, uncontrolled activation results in collateral damage to surrounding host tissues. Organ damage from alternative complement dysregulation occurs in several renal diseases including atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) (233–239) and membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II (MPGNII) (240,241). In aHUS, widespread blood clot formation and reactive endothelial cell proliferation in small blood vessels can lead to acute renal failure. Approximately 50% of patients with aHUS have a mutation in one of three complement regulators: Factor H, membrane cofactor protein, or Factor I (239). In aHUS, missense mutations in CFH give rise to a protein with altered binding to C3b, thus restricting Factor H in its capacity to protect host cells from complement attack. In MPGNII, uncontrolled systemic activation of the alternative complement pathway leads to the deposition of activated C3 complement fragments within the glomerular basement membrane. Remarkably, many patients with MPGNII also develop early onset macular drusen that are clinically, histologically, ultrastructurally and histochemically indistinguishable from ocular drusen in AMD (153). It was this observation that led our group to explore the role of complement dysregulation in AMD, and that ultimately led to the discovery of the CFH gene polymorphisms (192).
Although the discovery of a link between AMD and polymorphisms in the CFH and BF genes is a major advance in our understanding of the genetic basis of AMD, major unresolved issues remain. Possession of the BF and/or CFH risk-conferring haplotypes appears highly likely to place RPE and choroidal cells in the macula at sustained risk for alternative pathway-mediated complement attack. In the aging eye, it can be envisaged that this eventually leads to drusen accumulation, disruption of Bruch’s membrane integrity, and ensuing complications such as geographic atrophy and choroidal neovascularization. However, the nature of the activation event(s) that triggers the complement system in the macula has yet to be ascertained. Based upon the analogy to aHUS and MPGNII, microbial infection of the RPE/choroid is a distinct possibility (242), but it is certainly not the only one. It is puzzling why the macula of the eye and the glomerulus in the kidney appear to be the tissues that are most susceptible. Is it because the macula and the glomerulus share anatomical features and/or functional properties that render them more vulnerable to the effects of complement dysregulation? It is also puzzling why the macula is more vulnerable relative to more peripheral retinal locations. Clearly, the biological basis for the macula’s predilection for degeneration and neovascularization will require further study. In that regard, it is noteworthy that macular involvement is associated with a number of other ocular and nonocular disorders including macular edema, presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome, Alport’s syndrome, rubella, ocular toxoplasmosis, bacterial endocarditis, pseudoxanthoma elasticum and Menke’s disease (29,243).
Conclusion
Complement Factor H is the first gene identified in multiple independent studies that confers a significant risk for the development of AMD. This finding, together with the subsequent identification of AMD-associated variants in the related complement genes BF and C2, provides compelling evidence that the innate immune system and, more specifically, uncontrolled regulation of the alternative pathway of complement, plays a central role in the pathobiology of AMD. At this point, the most likely scenario is that exposure to infection or some other triggering event in genetically susceptible individuals, coupled with impaired complement regulatory function, leads to the sustained activation of the complement cascade, drusen formation and, eventually, development of AMD.
The emergence of this new paradigm of AMD pathogenesis sets the stage for the rapid development of early diagnostics, novel bioassays, and new animal models that faithfully mimic aspects of the disease process. Furthermore, the way is now paved for development of novel therapeutic interventions aimed at modulating the alternative pathway of complement in ‘at-risk’ individuals prior to the onset of choroidal neovascularization or geographic atrophy.
Now that the genetic basis for a major proportion of AMD cases has been elucidated, what additional scientific progress may be anticipated in the next few years, and what will be the ramifications of these new findings for the diagnosis and treatment of AMD? In the near term, a more comprehensive understanding of the genetic basis of AMD should rapidly emerge. It will not be surprising, for example, if genetic polymorphisms in additional complement components, complement regulators and, possibly, immune system effectors and inflammatory mediators are implicated in AMD. Secondly, it may be anticipated that the gene variants linked to AMD also contribute to other prevalent age-related diseases where chronic, local inflammatory processes are involved. For example, a significant statistical relationship between the CFH Tyr402His ‘risk’ variant and the incidence of myocardial infarction has recently been reported (242,244). Based upon this new genetic information, it will now be possible to devise genetic screening tests that will identify those individuals who are most at risk of developing AMD later in life. This will enable clinicians to monitor susceptible individuals from an early age, and to develop and test new preventive treatments in the early stages of the disease before the onset of vision loss. Finally, the development of new diagnostic and pharmacological approaches will be hastened by the identification of the alternative pathway of complement as a prime therapeutic target. As our understanding of the pathogenesis of AMD continues to improve rapidly, so do the prospects for novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches that will dramatically improve the quality of our prolonged lifespan.
Clinical principles.
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the most common cause of legal blindness among people over 60 years. Clinical hallmarks of the disease are observed in at least one third of persons over age 75 in industrialized countries.
AMD is the leading cause of blindness in the elderly worldwide, affecting 30–50 million individuals. Conservatively, the World Health Organization estimated in 2002 that 14 million persons worldwide are blind or severely visually impaired because of AMD.
AMD is often grouped into two basic clinical categories: the ‘dry’ atrophic form and the exudative neovascular, or ‘wet’, form.
There is neither a preventive therapy nor a cure for AMD. Palliative treatment options for wet AMD include anti-neovascular agents, photodynamic therapy and thermal laser. There are no current therapies for dry AMD, although antioxidant therapy delays progression in about 20%–25% of eyes.
Pathophysiologic principles.
The complement alternative pathway plays a predominant role in AMD pathology.
Allelic variations in genes coding the complement alternative pathway-associated proteins Factor H and Factor B confer risk for or protection from AMD. Combined analysis of the haplotypes for the genes encoding these proteins indicates that variation in the two loci can predict the clinical outcome in 74% of AMD cases.
Environmental factors modulate genetic susceptibility for the condition. Smoking and obesity are the two strongest risk factors identified to date.
New discoveries related to the underlying genetic susceptibility for AMD open new avenues for its diagnosis, treatment and prevention.
Acknowledgments
Supported in part by NIH EY11515 (GH), EY11527 (LJ) and EY11521 (DA), the American Macular Degeneration Foundation (GH), the International Retina Research Foundation (GH), Eye Research Institute (GH), and an unrestricted grants to the University of Iowa from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc. GH currently holds honorary professorships in the School of Medicine, Queen’s University, Belfast and the Shandong Eye Institute, Qingdao, China.
References
- 1.Uhlmann RF, Larson EB, Koepsell TD, Rees TS, Duckert LG. Visual impairment and cognitive dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. J Gen Intern Med. 1991;6:126–32. doi: 10.1007/BF02598307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lin MY, Gutierrez PR, Stone KL, Yaffe K, Ensrud KE, Fink HA, et al. Vision impairment and combined vision and hearing impairment predict cognitive and functional decline in older women. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:1996–2002. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52554.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rovner BW, Casten RJ, Tasman WS. Effect of depression on vision function in age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1041–4. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.8.1041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Abyad A. In-office screening for age-related hearing and vision loss. Geriatrics. 1997;52:45–6. 51–4, 57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Berman K, Brodaty H. Psychosocial effects of age-related macular degeneration. Int Psychogeriatr. 2006;8:1–14. doi: 10.1017/S1041610205002905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Taylor H, Guymer R, Keeffe J. Access Economics Pty Limited. Melbourne: University of Melbourne; 2006. The Impact of Age-Related Macular Degeneration; pp. 1–72. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sunness JS. The natural history of geographic atrophy, the advanced atrophic form of age-related macular degeneration. Mol Vis. 1999;5:25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Magnitude and causes of visual impairment. World Health Organization; Fact Sheet No 282. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya’ale D, Kocur I, Pararajasegaram R, Pokharel GP, et al. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82:844–51. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Klein R, Peto T, Bird A, Vannewkirk MR. The epidemiology of age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:486–95. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2003.11.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Smith W, Assink J, Klein R, Mitchell P, Klaver C, Klein B, et al. Risk factors for age-related macular degeneration: Pooled findings from three continents. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:697–704. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00580-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mitchell P, Smith W, Attebo K, Wang J. Prevalence of age-related maculopathy in Australia. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:1450–60. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30846-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.VanNewkirk M, Nanjan M, Wang J, Mitchell P, Taylor H, McCarty C. The prevalence of age-related maculopathy: the visual impairment project. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1593–600. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00175-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wolfs RC, Borger PH, Ramrattan RS, Klaver CC, Hulsman CA, Hofman A, et al. Changing views on open-angle glaucoma: definitions and prevalences—The Rotterdam Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:3309–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mitchell P, Wang JJ, Foran S, Smith W. Five-year incidence of age-related maculopathy lesions: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1092–7. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01055-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Friedman DS, O’Colmain BJ, Munoz B, Tomany SC, McCarty C, de Jong PT, et al. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:564–72. doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.4.564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Taylor HR, Keeffe JE, Vu HT, Wang JJ, Rochtchina E, Pezzullo ML, et al. Vision loss in Australia. Med J Aust. 2005;182:565–8. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb06815.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jonasson F, Arnarsson A, Peto T, Sasaki H, Sasaki K, Bird AC. 5-year incidence of age-related maculopathy in the Reykjavik Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:132–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Andersen N. Age-related macular degeneration among the Inuit in Greenland. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2004;63(Suppl 2):320–3. doi: 10.3402/ijch.v63i0.17928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Vingerling JR, Dielemans I, Hofman A, Grobbee DE, Hijmering M, Kramer CF, et al. The prevalence of age-related maculopathy in the Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:205–10. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)31034-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Krishnaiah S, Das T, Nirmalan PK, Nutheti R, Shamanna BR, Rao GN, et al. Risk factors for age-related macular degeneration: findings from the Andhra Pradesh eye disease study in South India. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:4442–9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Munoz B, Klein R, Rodriguez J, Snyder R, West SK. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in a population-based sample of Hispanic people in Arizona: Proyecto VER. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:1575–80. doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.11.1575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Leske MC, Wu SY, Hennis A, Nemesure B, Yang L, Hyman L, et al. Nine-year incidence of age-related macular degeneration in the Barbados Eye Studies. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wong TY, Loon SC, Saw SM. The epidemiology of age related eye diseases in Asia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:506–11. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.083733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Klein R, Davis MD, Magli YL, Segal P, Klein BE, Hubbard L. The Wisconsin age-related maculopathy grading system. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:1128–34. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32186-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group. The Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS): design implications. AREDS report no. 1. Control Clin Trials. 1999;20:573–600. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(99)00031-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Davis MD, Gangnon RE, Lee LY, Hubbard LD, Klein BE, Klein R, et al. The Age-Related Eye Disease Study severity scale for age-related macular degeneration: AREDS Report No.17. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:1484–98. doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.11.1484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ferris FL, Davis MD, Clemons TE, Lee LY, Chew EY, Lindblad AS, et al. A simplified severity scale for age-related macular degeneration: AREDS Report No.18. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:1570–4. doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.11.1570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wray S, Kuwabara T, Sanderson P. Menkes’ kinky hair disease: a light and electron microscopic study of the eye. Invest Ophthalmol. 1976;15:128–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Abugreen S, Muldrew KA, Stevenson MR, VanLeeuwen R, DeJong PT, Chakravarthy U. CNV subtype in first eyes predicts severity of ARM in fellow eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:307–11. doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.3.307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Clemons TE, Milton RC, Klein R, Seddon JM, Ferris FL., 3rd Risk factors for the incidence of Advanced Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) AREDS report no. 19. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:533–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.10.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Thornton J, Edwards R, Mitchell P, Harrison RA, Buchan I, Kelly SP. Smoking and age-related macular degeneration: a review of association. Eye. 2005;19:935–44. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group, . A randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of high-dose supplementation with vitamins C, E beta carotene, and zinc for age-related macular degeneration and vision loss: AREDS report no. 8. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1417–36. doi: 10.1001/archopht.119.10.1417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Choroidal neovascularization in the Choroidal Neovascularization Prevention Trial. The Choroidal Neovascularization Prevention Trial Research Group. . Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1364–72. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(98)98014-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Complications of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Prevention Trial Study Group. The Complications of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Prevention Trial (CAPT): rationale, design and methodology. Clin Trials. 2004;1:91–107. doi: 10.1191/1740774504cn007xx. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Friberg TR, Musch DC, Lim JI, Morse L, Freeman W, Sinclair S. Prophylactic treatment of age-related macular degeneration report number 1: 810-nanometer laser to eyes with drusen. Unilaterally eligible patients. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:622, e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.10.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Prenner JL, Rosenblatt BJ, Tolentino MJ, Ying GS, Javornik NB, Maguire MG, et al. Risk factors for choroidal neovascularization and vision loss in the fellow eye study of CNVPT. Retina. 2003;23:307–14. doi: 10.1097/00006982-200306000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Friberg TR the PTAMD Study Group. The Prophylactic Treatment of AMD Multi-Centered Trial (PTAMD): Results From the Bilateral Study Arm. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:E-Abstract 3538. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Argon laser photocoagulation for neovascular maculopathy, Three-year results from randomized clinical trials. Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986;104:694–701. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Krypton laser photocoagulation for neovascular lesions of age-related macular degeneration, Results of a randomized clinical trial. Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108:816–24. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1990.01070080058036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Laser photocoagulation of subfoveal neovascular lesions in age-related macular degeneration, Results of a randomized clinical trial. Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:1220–31. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1991.01080090044025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Han DP, Folk JC, Bratton AR. Visual loss after successful photocoagulation of choroidal neovascularization. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:1380–4. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(88)33013-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Persistent and recurrent neovascularization after krypton laser photocoagulation for neovascular lesions of age-related macular degeneration. Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108:825–31. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1990.01070080067037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Freund KB, Yannuzzi LA, Sorenson JA. Age-related macular degeneration and choroidal neovascularization. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115:786–91. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)73649-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Childs AL, Haller JA, Hawkins BS, Lewis H, et al. Surgery for hemorrhagic choroidal neovascular lesions of age-related macular degeneration: ophthalmic findings: SST report no. 13. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1993–2006. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.07.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hawkins BS, Bressler NM, Miskala PH, Bressler SB, Holekamp NM, Marsh MJ, et al. Surgery for subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration: ophthalmic findings: SST report no. 11. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1967–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.07.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Machemer R, Steinhorst UH. Retinal separation, retinotomy, and macular relocation: II. A surgical approach for age-related macular degeneration? Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1993;231:635–41. doi: 10.1007/BF00921957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.de Juan E, Jr, Loewenstein A, Bressler NM, Alexander J. Translocation of the retina for management of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization II: a preliminary report in humans. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125:635–46. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(98)00018-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Photodynamic therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration with verteporfin: one-year results of 2 randomized clinical trials—TAP report. Treatment of age-related macular degeneration with photodynamic therapy (TAP) Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1329–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Schmidt-Erfurth U, Hasan T. Mechanisms of action of photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000;45:195–214. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(00)00158-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Verteporfin In Photodynamic Therapy Study Group. Verteporfin therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration: two-year results of a randomized clinical trial including lesions with occult with no classic choroidal neovascularization—verteporfin in photodynamic therapy report 2. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;131:541–60. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(01)00967-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bressler NM, Arnold J, Benchaboune M, Blumenkranz MS, Fish GE, Gragoudas ES, et al. Verteporfin therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in patients with age-related macular degeneration: additional information regarding baseline lesion composition’s impact on vision outcomes—TAP report No.3. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1443–54. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.11.1443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Stevenson MR, Hart PM, Chakravarthy U, Mackenzie G, Bird AC, Owens SL, et al. Visual functioning and quality of life in the SubFoveal Radiotherapy Study (SFRADS): SFRADS report 2. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1045–51. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2003.030445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Goverdhan SV, Gibbs FA, Lotery AJ. Radiotherapy for age-related macular degeneration: no more pilot studies please. Eye. 2005;19:1137–41. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Marcus DM, Peskin E, Maguire M, Weissgold D, Alexander J, Fine S, et al. The age-related macular degeneration radiotherapy trial (AMDRT): one year results from a pilot study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138:818–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.06.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Gragoudas ES, Adamis AP, Cunningham ET, Jr, Feinsod M, Guyer DR. Pegaptanib for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2004;30:351, 2805–16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Heier JS, Shapiro H, Singh AA. Randomized, Controlled Phase III Study of Ranibizumab (Lucentis™) for Minimally Classic or Occult Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Two-Year Efficacy Results of the MARINA Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:E-Abstract 2959. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Rosenfeld PJ, Moshfeghi AA, Puliafito CA. Optical coherence tomography findings after an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (avastin) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2005;36:331–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Avery RL, Pieramici DJ, Rabena MD, Castellarin AA, Nasir MA, Giust MJ. Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:363–72. e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Vinores SA. Anecortave (Alcon Laboratories) IDrugs. 2005;8:327–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.D’Amico DJ, Goldberg MF, Hudson H, Jerdan JA, Krueger DS, Luna SP, et al. Anecortave acetate as monotherapy for treatment of subfoveal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration: twelve-month clinical outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:2372–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.08.020. discussion 84–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Spaide RF, Sorenson J, Maranan L. Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin combined with intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide for choroidal neovascularization. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:301–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Quiram PA, Gonzales CR, Schwartz SD. Severe steroid-induced glaucoma following intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:580–2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Jonas JB, Kreissig I, Spandau UH, Harder B. Infectious and noninfectious endophthalmitis after intravitreal high-dosage triamcinolone acetonide. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:579–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Guymer RH, Chiu AW, Lim L, Baird PN. HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins): do they have a role in age-related macular degeneration? Surv Ophthalmol. 2005;50:194–206. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2004.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Sarks S, Arnold J, Killingsworth M, Sarks J. Early drusen formation in the normal and aging eye and their relation to age-related maculopathy: a clinicopathological study. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83:358–68. doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.3.358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.McConnell V, Silvestri G. Age-related macular degeneration. Ulster Med J. 2005;74:82–92. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Provis JM, Penfold PL, Cornish EE, Sandercoe TM, Madigan MC. Anatomy and development of the macula: specialisation and the vulnerability to macular degeneration. Clin Exp Optom. 2005;88:269–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2005.tb06711.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Donoso LA, Kim D, Frost A, Callahan A, Hageman G. The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration. Surv Ophthalmol. 2006;51:137–52. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2005.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Arnold J, Sarks S. Age related macular degeneration. Clin Evid. 2004:819–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Hageman G, Mullins R. Molecular composition of drusen as related to substructural phenotype. Mol Vis. 1999;5:28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Sarraf D, Gin T, Yu F, Brannon A, Owens SL, Bird AC. Long-term drusen study. Retina. 1999;19:513–9. doi: 10.1097/00006982-199911000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Klein R, Klein B, Jensen S, Meuer S. The five-year incidence and progression of age-related maculopathy: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:7–21. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30368-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Spraul C, Grossniklaus H. Characteristics of drusen and Bruch’s membrane in postmortem eyes with age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:267–73. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150269022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Sarks JP, Sarks SH, Killingsworth MC. Evolution of soft drusen in age-related macular degeneration. Eye. 1994;8(Pt 3):269–83. doi: 10.1038/eye.1994.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Guymer R, Bird A. Bruch’s membrane, drusen, and age-related macular degeneration. In: Marmor M, Wolfensberger T, editors. The Retinal Pigment Epithelium. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998. pp. 693–705. [Google Scholar]
- 77.Zarbin MA. Current concepts in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;122:598–614. doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.4.598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Sivaprasad S, Bailey TA, Chong VN. Bruch’s membrane and the vascular intima: is there a common basis for age-related changes and disease? Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2005;33:518–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2005.01074.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Marshall J, Hussain A, Starita C, Moore D, Patmore A. The Retinal Pigment Epithelium. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 80.Guymer R, Luthert P, Bird A. Changes in Bruch’s membrane and related structures with age. Prog Retin Eye Res. 1999;18:59–90. doi: 10.1016/s1350-9462(98)00012-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Hogan M, Alvarado J. Studies on the human macula. Aging changes in Bruch’s membrane. Arch Ophthalmol. 1967;77:410–20. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1967.00980020412022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Sarks SH. Ageing and degeneration in the macular region: a clinico-pathological study. Br J Ophthalmol. 1976;60:324–41. doi: 10.1136/bjo.60.5.324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Green WR, McDonnell PJ, Yeo JH. Pathologic features of senile macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 1985;92:615–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Feeney-Burns L, Ellersieck M. Age-related changes in the ultrastructure of Bruch’s membrane. Am J Ophthalmol. 1985;100:686–97. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(85)90625-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Grindle C, Marshall J. Ageing changes in Bruch’s membrane and their functional implications. Trans Ophthal Soc UK. 1978;98:172–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Pauleikhoff D, Sheraidah G, Marshall J, Bird A, Wessing A. Biochemical and histochemical analysis of age related lipid deposits in Bruch’s membrane. Ophthalmologe. 1994;91:730–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Handa JT, Verzijl N, Matsunaga H, Aotaki-Keen A, Lutty GA, te Koppele JM, et al. Increase in the advanced glycation end product pentosidine in Bruch’s membrane with age. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:775–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Curcio C, Millican C, Bailey T, Kruth H. Accumulation of cholesterol with age in human Bruch’s membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:265–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Kamei M, Hollyfield J. TIMP-3 in Bruch’s membrane: changes during aging and in age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:2367–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Newsome D, Huh W, Green W. Bruch’s membrane age-related changes vary by region. Curr Eye Res. 1987;6:1211–21. doi: 10.3109/02713688709025231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Ishibashi T, Murata T, Hangai M, Nagai R, Horiuchi S, Lopez P, et al. Advanced glycation end products in age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:1629–32. doi: 10.1001/archopht.116.12.1629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Hewitt A, Nakazawa K, Newsome D. Analysis of newly synthesized Bruch’s membrane proteoglycans. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989;30:478–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Karwatowski W, Jeffries T, Duance V, Albon J, Bailey A, Easty D. Preparation of Bruch’s membrane and analysis of the age-related changes in the structural collagens. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;79:944–52. doi: 10.1136/bjo.79.10.944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Haimovici R, Gantz DL, Rumelt S, Freddo TF, Small DM. The lipid composition of drusen, Bruch’s membrane, and sclera by hot stage polarizing light microscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:1592–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Li CM, Chung BH, Presley JB, Malek G, Zhang X, Dashti N, et al. Lipoprotein-like particles and cholesteryl esters in human Bruch’s membrane: initial characterization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:2576–86. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Starita C, Hussain A, Pagliarini S, Marshall J. Hydrodynamics of ageing Bruch’s membrane: implications for macular disease. Exp Eye Res. 1996;62:565–72. doi: 10.1006/exer.1996.0066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Moore D, Clover G. The effect of age on the macromolecuar permeability of human Bruch’s membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:2970–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Hussain A, Rowe L, Marshall J. Age-related alterations in the diffusional transport of amino acids across the human Bruch’s-choroid complex. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2002;19:166–72. doi: 10.1364/josaa.19.000166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Moore D, Hussain A, Marshall J. Age-related variation in the hydraulic conductivity of Bruch’s membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36:1290–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Chong NH, Keonin J, Luthert PJ, Frennesson CI, Weingeist DM, Wolf RL, et al. Decreased thickness and integrity of the macular elastic layer of Bruch’s membrane correspond to the distribution of lesions associated with age-related macular degeneration. Am J Pathol. 2005;166:241–51. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)62248-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Nackman G, Karkowski F, Halpern V, Gaetz H, Tilson M. Elastin degradation products induce adventitial angiogenesis in the Anidjar/Dobrin rat aneurysm model. Surgery. 1997;122:39–44. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6060(97)90262-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Kamisato S, Uemura Y, Takami N, Okamoto K. Involvement of intracellular cyclic GMP and cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinase in alpha-elastin-induced macrophage chemotaxis. J Biochem (Tokyo) 1997;121:862–7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a021666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Marshall J, Hussain A, Starita C, Moore D, Patmore A. Aging and Bruch’s membrane. In: Marmor M, Wolfensberger T, editors. The Retinal Pigment Epithelium. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998. pp. 669–92. [Google Scholar]
- 104.Holz F, Sheraiadah G, Pauleikhoff D, Marshall J, Bird A. Analysis of lipid deposits extracted from human macular and peripheral Bruch’s membrane. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:402–6. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1994.01090150132035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Pauleikhoff D, Harper C, Marshall J, Bird A. Aging changes in Bruch’s membrane. Ophthalmology. 1990;97:171–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Anderson D, Ozaki S, Nealon M, Neitz J, Mullins R, Hageman G, et al. Local cellular sources of apolipoprotein E in the human retina and retinal pigmented epithelium: Implications for the process of drusen formation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;131:767–81. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(00)00961-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Farkas T, Sylvester V, Archer D, Altona M. The histochemistry of drusen. Am J Ophthalmol. 1971;71:1206–15. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(71)90964-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Green WR, Enger C. Age-related macular degeneration histopathologic studies. The 1992 Lorenz E. Zimmerman Lecture. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:1519–35. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(93)31466-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Kliffen M, van der Schaft TL, Mooy CM, de Jong PT. Morphologic changes in age-related maculopathy. Microsc Res Tech. 1997;36:106–22. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0029(19970115)36:2<106::AID-JEMT4>3.0.CO;2-N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Feher J, Valu L. On the structure of Bruch’s membrane. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1967;173:162–7. doi: 10.1007/BF00405719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Loffler KU, Lee WR. Basal linear deposit in the human macula. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1986;224:493–501. doi: 10.1007/BF02154735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.van der Schaft TL, de Bruijn WC, Mooy CM, Ketelaars DA, de Jong PT. Is basal laminar deposit unique for age-related macular degeneration? [see comments] Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:420–5. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1991.01080030122052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.van der Schaft T, Mooy C, de Bruijn W, Oron F, Mulder P, de Jong P. Histological features of age-related macular degeneration. A statistical analysis. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:278–86. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(92)31982-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Spraul CW, Lang GE, Grossniklaus HE. Morphometric analysis of the choroid, Bruch’s membrane, and retinal pigment epithelium in eyes with age-related macular degeneration [see comments] Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:2724–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Milam AH, Curcio CA, Cideciyan AV, Saxena S, John SK, Kruth HS, et al. Dominant late-onset retinal degeneration with regional variation of sub-retinal pigment epithelium deposits, retinal function, and photoreceptor degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:2256–66. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00419-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Kliffen M, Mooy CM, Luider TM, Huijmans JG, Kerkvliet S, de Jong PT. Identification of glycosaminoglycans in age-related macular deposits. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:1009–14. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1996.01100140217021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Kliffen M, Mooy CM, Luider TM, de Jong PT. Analysis of carbohydrate structures in basal laminar deposit in aging human maculae. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:2901–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.van der Schaft T, Mooy C, de Bruijn W, Bosman F, de Jong P. Immunohistochemical light and electron microscopy of basal laminar deposit. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1994;232:40–6. doi: 10.1007/BF00176436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Knupp C, Amin S, Munro P, Luthert P, Squire J. Collagen VI assemblies in age-related macular degeneration. J Struct Biol. 2002;139:181–9. doi: 10.1016/s1047-8477(02)00534-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Curcio CA, Presley JB, Millican CL, Medeiros NE. Basal deposits and drusen in eyes with age-related maculopathy: evidence for solid lipid particles. Exp Eye Res. 2005;80:761–75. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2004.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Sarks S, Van Driel D, Maxwell L, Killingsworth M. Softening of drusen and subretinal neovascularization. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1980;100:414–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Okubo A, Rosa R, Bunce C, Alexander R, Fan J, Bird A, et al. The relationships of age changes in retinal pigment epithelium and Bruch’s membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:443–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Hogan M. Role of the retinal pigment epithelium in macular disease. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1972;76:64–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Bird A. Pathophysiology of AMD. In: Hampton GR, Nelsen PT, editors. Age-related macular degeneration: principles and practice. Chapter 3 New York: Raven Press; 1992. [Google Scholar]
- 125.Dorey C, Wu G, Ebenstein D. Cell loss in the aging retina: Relationship to lipofuscin accumulation and macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989;30:1691–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Bird AC. Bruch’s membrane change with age. Br J Ophthalmol. 1992;76:166–8. doi: 10.1136/bjo.76.3.166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Katz ML, Robison WG., Jr Age-related changes in the retinal pigment epithelium of pigmented rats. Exp Eye Res. 1984;38:137–51. doi: 10.1016/0014-4835(84)90098-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Feeney-Burns L, Hilderbrand E, Eldridge S. Aging human RPE: morphometric analysis of macular, equatorial and peripheral cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1984;25:195–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Wing G, Blanchard G, Weiter J. Topography and age relationship of lipofuscin concentration in the RPE. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1978;7:601–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Rozanowska M, Jarvis-Evans J, Korytowski W, Boulton ME, Burke JM, Sarna T. Blue light-induced reactivity of retinal age pigment. In vitro generation of oxygen-reactive species. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:18825–30. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.32.18825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Holz F, Bellman C, Staudt S, Schutt F, Volcker H. Fundus autofluorescence and development of geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:1051–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Katz ML. Potential role of retinal pigment epithelial lipofuscin accumulation in age-related macular degeneration. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2002;34:359–70. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4943(02)00012-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Sparrow JR, Boulton M. RPE lipofuscin and its role in retinal pathobiology. Exp Eye Res. 2005;80:595–606. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2005.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Ramrattan R, van der Schaft T, Mooy C, de Bruijn W, Mulder P, de Jong P. Morphometric analysis of Bruch’s membrane, the choriocapillaris, and the choroid in aging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:2857–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.McLeod DS, Taomoto M, Otsuji T, Green WR, Sunness JS, Lutty GA. Quantifying changes in RPE and choroidal vasculature in eyes with age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002 Jun;43:1986–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Midena E, Segato T, Blarzino MC, Degli Angeli C. Macular drusen and the sensitivity of the central visual field. Doc Ophthalmol. 1994;88:179–85. doi: 10.1007/BF01204616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Curcio C, Medeiros N, Millican C. Photoreceptor loss in age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:1236–49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Jackson GR, Owsley C. Visual dysfunction, neurodegenerative diseases, and aging. Neurol Clin. 2003;21:709–28. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8619(02)00107-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Li J, Tso MO, Lam TT. Reduced amplitude and delayed latency in foveal response of multifocal electroretinogram in early age related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:287–90. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.3.287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Owsley C, Jackson GR, Cideciyan AV, Huang Y, Fine SL, Ho AC, et al. Psychophysical evidence for rod vulnerability in age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:267–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Jackson GR, Owsley C, Curcio CA. Photoreceptor degeneration and dysfunction in aging and age-related maculopathy. Ageing Res Rev. 2002;1:381–96. doi: 10.1016/s1568-1637(02)00007-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Owsley C, Jackson GR, White M, Feist R, Edwards D. Delays in rod-mediated dark adaptation in early age-related maculopathy. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1196–202. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00580-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Jackson GR, McGwin G, Jr, Phillips JM, Klein R, Owsley C. Impact of aging and age-related maculopathy on activation of the a-wave of the rod-mediated electroretinogram. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:3271–8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Owsley C, McGwin G, Jackson GR, Heimburger DC, Piyathilake CJ, Klein R, et al. Effect of short-term, high-dose retinol on dark adaptation in aging and early age-related maculopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:1310–8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Stangos N, Voutas S, Topouzis F, Karampatakis V. Contrast sensitivity evaluation in eyes predisposed to age-related macular degeneration and presenting normal visual acuity. Ophthalmologica. 1995;209:194–8. doi: 10.1159/000310612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Sunness J, Massof R, Johnson M, Bressler N, Bressler S, Fine S. Diminished foveal sensitivity may predict the development of advanced age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 1989;96:375–81. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(89)32883-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Kleiner RC, Enger C, Alexander MF, Fine SL. Contrast sensitivity in age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106:55–7. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1988.01060130061028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Sandberg MA, Gaudio AR. Slow photostress recovery and disease severity in age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 1995;15:407–12. doi: 10.1097/00006982-199515050-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Eisner A, Klein ML, Zilis JD, Watkins MD. Visual function and the subsequent development of exudative age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:3091–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Eisner A, Stoumbos VD, Klein ML, Fleming SA. Relations between fundus appearance and function. Eyes whose fellow eye has exudative age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:8–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Johnson PT, Brown MN, Pulliam BC, Anderson DH, Johnson LV. Synaptic pathology, altered gene expression, and degeneration in photoreceptors impacted by drusen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:4788–95. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Johnson PT, Lewis GP, Talaga KC, Brown MN, Kappel PJ, Fisher SK, et al. Drusen-associated degeneration in the retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:4481–8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-0436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Hageman GS, Luthert PJ, Victor Chong NH, Johnson LV, Anderson DH, Mullins RF. An integrated hypothesis that considers drusen as biomarkers of immune-mediated processes at the rpe-bruch’s membrane interface in aging and age-related macular degeneration. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2001;20:705–32. doi: 10.1016/s1350-9462(01)00010-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Anderson D, Mullins R, Hageman G, Johnson LV. A role for local inflammation in the formation of drusen in the aging eye. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134:411–31. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01624-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Killingsworth M, Sarks J, Sarks S. Macrophages related to Bruch’s membrane in age-related macular degeneration. Eye. 1990;4:613–21. doi: 10.1038/eye.1990.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Penfold PL, Madigan MC, Gillies MC, Provis JM. Progress in Retinal Research. London: Elsevier Science Ltd; 2001. Immunological and Aetiological Aspects of Macular Degeneration; pp. 385–414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Heriot W, Henkind P, Bellhorn R, Burns M. Choroidal neovascularization can digest Bruch’s membrane. A prior break is not essential. Ophthalmology. 1984;91:1603–8. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(84)34112-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Penfold P, Killingsworth M, Sarks S. An ultrastructural study of the role of leucocytes and fibroblasts in the breakdown of Bruch’s membrane. Aust J Ophthalmol. 1984;12:23–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Dastgheib K, Green W. Granulomatous reaction to Bruch’s membrane in age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:813–8. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1994.01090180111045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Hageman G, Mullins R, Russell S, Johnson L, Anderson D. Vitronectin is a constituent of ocular drusen and the vitronectin gene is expressed in human retinal pigmented epithelial cells. FASEB J. 1999;13:477–84. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.13.3.477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Mullins RF, Russell SR, Anderson DH, Hageman GS. Drusen associated with aging and age-related macular degeneration contain proteins common to extracellular deposits associated with atherosclerosis, elastosis, amyloi-dosis, and dense deposit disease. FASEB J. 2000;14:835–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Johnson L, Ozaki S, Staples M, Erickson P, Anderson D. A potential role for immune complex pathogenesis in drusen formation. Exp Eye Res. 2000;70:441–9. doi: 10.1006/exer.1999.0798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Johnson L, Leitner W, Staples M, Anderson D. Complement activation and inflammatory processes in drusen formation and age related macular degeneration. Exp Eye Res. 2001;73:887–96. doi: 10.1006/exer.2001.1094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Mullins RF, Johnson LV, Anderson DH, Hageman GS. Characterization of drusen-associated glycoconjugates. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:288–94. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30322-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Russell SR, Mullins RF, Schneider BL, Hageman GS. Location, substructure, and composition of basal laminar drusen compared with drusen associated with aging and age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:205–14. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00345-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Mullins RF, Aptsiauri N, Hageman GS. Structure and composition of drusen associated with glomerulonephritis: implications for the role of complement activation in drusen biogenesis. Eye. 2001;15(Pt 3):390–5. doi: 10.1038/eye.2001.142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Johnson LV, Leitner WP, Rivest AJ, Staples MK, Radeke MJ, Anderson DH. The Alzheimer’s A beta-peptide is deposited at sites of complement activation in pathologic deposits associated with aging and age-related macular degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:11830–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.192203399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Malek G, Li CM, Guidry C, Medeiros NE, Curcio CA. Apolipoprotein B in cholesterol-containing drusen and basal deposits of human eyes with age-related maculopathy. Am J Pathol. 2003;162:413–25. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63836-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Anderson D, Talaga K, Rivest A, Barron E, Hageman G, Johnson L. Characterization of beta amyloid assemblies in drusen: the deposits associated with aging and age-related macular degeneration. Exp Eye Res. 2004;78:243–56. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2003.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Peto T, Lengyel I, Frederickson C, Vankuijk F. Zinc in Drusen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:E-Abstract 3008. [Google Scholar]
- 171.Holers VM. The complement system as a therapeutic target in autoimmunity. Clin Immunol. 2003;107:140–51. doi: 10.1016/s1521-6616(03)00034-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Fearon DT, Locksley RM. The instructive role of innate immunity in the acquired immune response. Science. 1996;272:50–3. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5258.50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Mastellos D, Andronis C, Persidis A, Lambris JD. Novel biological networks modulated by complement. Clin Immunol. 2005;115:225–35. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2005.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Mastellos D, Germenis AE, Lambris JD. Complement: an inflammatory pathway fulfilling multiple roles at the interface of innate immunity and development. Curr Drug Targets Inflamm Allergy. 2005;(4):125–7. doi: 10.2174/1568010053622993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Walport MJ. Complement. Second of two parts. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1140–4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200104123441506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Walport MJ. Complement. First of two parts. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1058–66. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200104053441406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Thurman JM, Holers VM. The central role of the alternative complement pathway in human disease. J Immunol. 2006;176:1305–10. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.3.1305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Pio R, Martinez A, Unsworth EJ, Kowalak JA, Bengoechea JA, Zipfel PF, et al. Complement factor H is a serum-binding protein for adrenomedullin, and the resulting complex modulates the bioactivities of both partners. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:12292–300. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M007822200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Holers VM, Thurman JM. The alternative pathway of complement in disease: opportunities for therapeutic targeting. Mol Immunol. 2004;41:147–52. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2004.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Song WC. Membrane complement regulatory proteins in autoimmune and inflammatory tissue injury. Curr Dir Autoimmun. 2004;7:181–99. doi: 10.1159/000075693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Zipfel PF, Heinen S, Jozsi M, Skerka C. Complement and diseases: defective alternative pathway control results in kidney and eye diseases. Mol Immunol. 2006;43:97–106. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2005.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Halstensen TS, Mollnes TE, Fausa O, Brandtzaeg P. Deposits of terminal complement complex (TCC) in muscularis mucosae and submucosal vessels in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease of the colon. Gut. 1989;30:361–6. doi: 10.1136/gut.30.3.361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Sospedra M, Martin R. Immunology of multiple sclerosis. Annu Rev Immunol. 2005;23:683–747. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Lassmann H. Recent neuropathological findings in MS—implications for diagnosis and therapy. J Neurol. 2004 Sep;251(Suppl 4):IV2–5. doi: 10.1007/s00415-004-1402-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Neumann E, Barnum SR, Tarner IH, Echols J, Fleck M, Judex M, et al. Local production of complement proteins in rheumatoid arthritis synovium. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46:934–45. doi: 10.1002/art.10183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Tang S, Lui SL, Lai KN. Pathogenesis of lupus nephritis: an update. Nephrology (Carlton) 2005;10:174–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2005.00392.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Turnberg D, Cook HT. Complement and glomerulonephritis: new insights. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2005;14:223–8. doi: 10.1097/01.mnh.0000165887.75501.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Gerard NP, Gerard C. Complement in allergy and asthma. Curr Opin Immunol. 2002;14:705–8. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(02)00410-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Rodriguez de Cordoba S, Esparza-Gordillo J, Goicoechea de Jorge E, Lopez-Trascasa M, Sanchez-Corral P. The human complement factor H: functional roles, genetic variations and disease associations. Mol Immunol. 2004;41:355–67. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2004.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Pangburn MK, Pangburn KL, Koistinen V, Meri S, Sharma AK. Molecular mechanisms of target recognition in an innate immune system: interactions among factor H, C3b, and target in the alternative pathway of human complement. J Immunol. 2000;164:4742–51. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.9.4742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Zipfel PF. Complement factor H: physiology and pathophysiology. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2001;27:191–9. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-15248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Hageman GS, Anderson DH, Johnson LV, Hancox LS, Taiber AJ, Hardisty LI, et al. A common haplotype in the complement regulatory gene factor H (HF1/CFH) predisposes individuals to age-related macular degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:7227–32. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501536102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Johnson LV, Talaga KC, Rivest AJ, Staples MK, Radeke MJ, Barron E, et al. Characterization of Beta Amyloid-Containing Vesicles within Drusen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:E-Abstract 4229. [Google Scholar]
- 194.Hageman G, Luthert P, Chong N, Johnson L, Anderson D, Mullins R. An integrated hypothesis that considers drusen as biomarkers of immune-mediated processes at the RPE-Bruch’s membrane interface in aging and age-related macular degeneration. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2001;20:705–32. doi: 10.1016/s1350-9462(01)00010-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Miller DM, Espinosa-Heidmann DG, Legra J, Dubovy SR, Suner IJ, Sedmak DD, et al. The association of prior cytomegalovirus infection with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138:323–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Klein M, Mauldin W, Stoumbos V. Heredity and age-related macular degeneration. Observations in monozygotic twins. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:932–7. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1994.01090190080025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Heiba I, Elston R, Klein B, Klein R. Sibling correlations and segregation analysis of age-related maculopathy: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Genet Epidemiol. 1994;11:51–67. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370110106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Seddon J, Ajani U, Mitchell B. Familial aggregation of age-related maculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;123:199–206. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)71036-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Meyers SM, Greene T, Gutman FA. A twin study of age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;120:757–66. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72729-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Hammond CJ, Webster AR, Snieder H, Bird AC, Gilbert CE, Spector TD. Genetic influence on early age-related maculopathy: a twin study. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:730–6. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)01049-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Abecasis GR, Yashar BM, Zhao Y, Ghiasvand NM, Zareparsi S, Branham KE, et al. Age-related macular degeneration: a high-resolution genome scan for susceptibility loci in a population enriched for late-stage disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74:482–94. doi: 10.1086/382786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Iyengar SK, Song D, Klein BE, Klein R, Schick JH, Humphrey J, et al. Dissection of genomewide-scan data in extended families reveals a major locus and oligogenic susceptibility for age-related macular degeneration. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74:20–39. doi: 10.1086/380912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Klein ML, Schultz DW, Edwards A, Matise TC, Rust K, Berselli CB, et al. Age-related macular degeneration. Clinical features in a large family and linkage to chromosome 1q. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:1082–8. doi: 10.1001/archopht.116.8.1082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Majewski J, Schultz DW, Weleber RG, Schain MB, Edwards AO, Matise TC, et al. Age-related macular degeneration—a genome scan in extended families. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;73:540–50. doi: 10.1086/377701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Schick JH, Iyengar SK, Klein BE, Klein R, Reading K, Liptak R, et al. A whole-genome screen of a quantitative trait of age-related maculopathy in sibships from the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72:1412–24. doi: 10.1086/375500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Seddon JM, Santangelo SL, Book K, Chong S, Cote J. A genomewide scan for age-related macular degeneration provides evidence for linkage to several chromosomal regions. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;73:780–90. doi: 10.1086/378505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Weeks DE, Conley YP, Mah TS, Paul TO, Morse L, Ngo-Chang J, et al. A full genome scan for age-related maculopathy. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9:1329–49. doi: 10.1093/hmg/9.9.1329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Weeks DE, Conley YP, Tsai HJ, Mah TS, Rosenfeld PJ, Paul TO, et al. Age-related maculopathy: an expanded genome-wide scan with evidence of susceptibility loci within the 1q31 and 17q25 regions. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;132:682–92. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(01)01214-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Weeks DE, Conley YP, Tsai HJ, Mah TS, Schmidt S, Postel EA, et al. Age-Related Maculopathy: A Genomewide Scan with Continued Evidence of Susceptibility Loci within the 1q31, 10q26, and 17q25 Regions. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;75(2):174–89. doi: 10.1086/422476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Fisher SA, Abecasis GR, Yashar BM, Zareparsi S, Swaroop A, Iyengar SK, et al. Meta-analysis of genome scans of age-related macular degeneration. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:2257–64. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Schultz D, Klein M, Humpert A, Luzier C, Persun V, Schain M, et al. Analysis of the ARMD1 locus: Evidence that a mutation in HEMICENTIN-1 is associated with age-related macular degeneration in a large family. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12:3315–23. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddg348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Conley YP, Thalamuthu A, Jakobsdottir J, Weeks DE, Mah T, Ferrell RE, et al. Candidate gene analysis suggests a role for fatty acid biosynthesis and regulation of the complement system in the etiology of age-related maculopathy. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:1991–2002. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Haines JL, Schnetz-Boutaud N, Schmidt S, Scott WK, Agarwal A, Postel EA, et al. Functional candidate genes in age-related macular degeneration: significant association with VEGF, VLDLR, and LRP6. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:329–35. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Stone EM, Braun TA, Russell SR, Kuehn MH, Lotery AJ, Moore PA, et al. Missense variations in the fibulin 5 gene and age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:346–53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Zareparsi S, Buraczynska M, Branham KE, Shah S, Eng D, Li M, et al. Toll-like receptor 4 variant D299G is associated with susceptibility to age-related macular degeneration. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:1449–55. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Souied EH, Benlian P, Amouyel P, Feingold J, Lagarde JP, Munnich A, et al. The epsilon4 allele of the apolipoprotein E gene as a potential protective factor for exudative age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125:353–9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(99)80146-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Klaver CC, Kliffen M, van Duijn CM, Hofman A, Cruts M, Grobbee DE, et al. Genetic association of apolipoprotein E with age-related macular degeneration. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;63:200–6. doi: 10.1086/301901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Baird PN, Guida E, Chu DT, Vu HT, Guymer RH. The epsilon2 and epsilon4 alleles of the apolipoprotein gene are associated with age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:1311–5. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Allikmets R, Shroyer N, Singh N, Seddon J, Lewis R, Bernstein P, et al. Mutation of the Stargardt disease gene (ABCR) in age-related macular degeneration. Science. 1997;277:1805–7. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5333.1805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Klein RJ, Zeiss C, Chew EY, Tsai JY, Sackler RS, Haynes C, et al. Complement factor H polymorphism in age-related macular degeneration. Science. 2005;15;308:385–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1109557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Edwards AO, Ritter R, 3rd, Abel KJ, Manning A, Panhuysen C, Farrer LA. Complement factor H polymorphism and age-related macular degeneration. Science. 2005;308:421–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1110189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Haines JL, Hauser MA, Schmidt S, Scott WK, Olson LM, Gallins P, et al. Complement factor H variant increases the risk of age-related macular degeneration. Science. 2005;308:419–21. doi: 10.1126/science.1110359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Zareparsi S, Branham KE, Li M, Shah S, Klein RJ, Ott J, et al. Strong association of the Y402H variant in complement factor H at 1q32 with susceptibility to age-related macular degeneration. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;77:149–53. doi: 10.1086/431426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Magnusson KP, Duan S, Sigurdsson H, Petursson H, Yang Z, Zhao Y, et al. CFH Y402H confers similar risk of soft drusen and both forms of advanced AMD. PLoS Med. 2006;3:e5. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Sepp T, Khan JC, Thurlby DA, Shahid H, Clayton DG, Moore AT, et al. Complement factor H variant Y402H is a major risk determinant for geographic atrophy and choroidal neovascularization in smokers and nonsmokers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:536–40. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Souied EH, Leveziel N, Richard F, Dragon-Durey MA, Coscas G, Soubrane G, et al. Y402H complement factor H polymorphism associated with exudative age-related macular degeneration in the French population. Mol Vis. 2005;11:1135–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Okamoto H, Umeda S, Obazawa M, Minami M, Noda T, Mizota A, et al. Complement factor H polymorphisms in Japanese population with age-related macular degeneration. Mol Vis. 2006;12:156–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Gold B, Merriam JE, Zernant J, Hancox LS, Taiber AJ, Gehrs K, et al. Variation in factor B (BF) and complement component 2 (C2) genes is associated with age-related macular degeneration. Nat Genet. 2006;38:458–62. doi: 10.1038/ng1750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Lokki ML, Koskimies SA. Allelic differences in hemolytic activity and protein concentration of BF molecules are found in association with particular HLA haplotypes. Immunogenetics. 1991;34:242–6. doi: 10.1007/BF00215259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Jakobsdottir J, Conley YP, Weeks DE, Mah TS, Ferrell RE, Gorin MB. Susceptibility genes for age-related maculopathy on chromosome 10q26. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;77:389–407. doi: 10.1086/444437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Rivera A, Fisher SA, Fritsche LG, Keilhauer CN, Lichtner P, Meitinger T, et al. Hypothetical LOC387715 is a second major susceptibility gene for age-related macular degeneration, contributing independently of complement factor H to disease risk. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:3227–36. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Schmidt S, Hauser MA, Scott WK, Postel EA, Agarwal A, Gallins P, et al. Cigarette smoking strongly modifies the association of LOC387715 and age-related macular degeneration. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;78:852–64. doi: 10.1086/503822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Saunders RE, Goodship TH, Zipfel PF, Perkins SJ. An interactive web database of factor H-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome mutations: insights into the structural consequences of disease-associated mutations. Hum Mutat. 2006;27:21–30. doi: 10.1002/humu.20268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Heinen S, Sanchez-Corral P, Jackson MS, Strain L, Goodship JA, Kemp EJ, et al. De novo gene conversion in the RCA gene cluster (1q32) causes mutations in complement factor H associated with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Hum Mutat. 2006;27:292–3. doi: 10.1002/humu.9408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Warwicker P, Goodship TH, Donne RL, Pirson Y, Nicholls A, Ward RM, et al. Genetic studies into inherited and sporadic hemolytic uremic syndrome. Kidney Int. 1998;53:836–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.1998.00824.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Esparza-Gordillo J, Goicoechea de Jorge E, Buil A, Carreras Berges L, Lopez-Trascasa M, Sanchez-Corral P, et al. Predisposition to atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome involves the concurrence of different susceptibility alleles in the regulators of complement activation gene cluster in 1q32. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:703–12. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237.Caprioli J, Castelletti F, Bucchioni S, Bettinaglio P, Bresin E, Pianetti G, et al. Complement factor H mutations and gene polymorphisms in haemolytic uraemic syndrome: the C-257T, the A2089G and the G2881T polymorphisms are strongly associated with the disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12:3385–95. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddg363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Caprioli J, Noris M, Brioschi S, Pianetti G, Castelletti F, Bettinaglio P, et al. Genetics of HUS: the impact of MCP, CFH and IF mutations on clinical presentation, response to treatment, and outcome. Blood. 2006;108:1267–79. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-10-007252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Atkinson JP, Liszewski MK, Richards A, Kavanagh D, Moulton EA. Hemolytic uremic syndrome: an example of insufficient complement regulation on self-tissue. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1056:144–52. doi: 10.1196/annals.1352.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Abrera-Abeleda MA, Nishimura C, Smith JL, Sethi S, McRae JL, Murphy BF, et al. Variations in the Complement Regulatory Genes Factor H (CFH) and Factor H Related 5 (CFHR5) are Associated with Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis Type II (Dense Deposit Disease) J Med Genet. 2006;43:582–9. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2005.038315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Appel GB, Cook HT, Hageman G, Jennette JC, Kashgarian M, Kirschfink M, et al. Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II (dense deposit disease): an update. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:1392–403. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005010078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242.Robman L, Mahdi O, McCarty C, Dimitrov P, Tikellis G, McNeil J, et al. Exposure to Chlamydia pneumoniae infection and progression of age-related macular degeneration. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161:1013–9. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Erkkila H, Raitta C, Niemi K. Ocular findings in four siblings with pseudoxanthoma elasticum. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1983;61:589–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1983.tb04349.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244.Zee RY, Diehl KA, Ridker PM. Complement factor H Y402H gene polymorphism, C-reactive protein, and risk of incident myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, and venous thromboembolism: A nested case-control study. Atherosclerosis. 2006;187:332–5. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]