Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 May 4;6:25290. doi: 10.1038/srep25290

A meta-analytical assessment of STK39 three well-defined polymorphisms in susceptibility to hypertension

Hualing Yang 1,*, Lingyang Ye 1,*, Qingxiang Wang 1,*, Dongmiao Cai 1, Qumin Chen 1, Hongming Pan 2, Zhanxiang Wang 3,a
PMCID: PMC4855189  PMID: 27142475

Abstract

Serine/threonine kinase 39 gene (STK39) is one of the promising hypertension-susceptibility genes identified by a genome-wide association study in 2009, whereas subsequent validation in other ethnic groups is unsatisfactory, with inconsistent and inconclusive findings. We therefore aimed to meta-analytically assess the risk prediction of STK39 three polymorphisms, rs6749447, rs35929607 and rs3754777, for primary hypertension. Literature search and data collection were independently completed by two authors. Nine articles were pooled in this study. Overall analyses failed to see any significant associations of rs6749447, rs35929607 and rs3754777 with hypertension risk (odds ratio: 1.27, 0.95 and 1.21; P = 0.270, 0.507 and 0.153, respectively), and there was evident heterogeneity for three comparisons (I2 > 80%). Meta-regression analyses indicated that smoking was a significant risk factor for the association of rs3754777 with hypertension (P = 0.017). As reflected by the Begg’s and Filled funnel plots, as well as Egger’s tests, there were low probabilities of publication bias. In conclusion, our meta-analytical findings suggest that STK39 might not be a hypertension-susceptibility gene.

Since serine/threonine kinase 39 gene (STK39) was first identified as a hypertension-susceptibility gene by a genome-wide association study in 20091, it has become a major target of ongoing studies to unravel which genetic loci in STK39 can predispose individuals at risk for elevated blood pressure2,3,4. Biologically, STK39 gene encodes a serine/threnine kinase termed as a Ste20-related proline/alanine-rich kinase (SPAK). Compelling evidence from in vitro studies indicates that SPAK binds to and phosphorylates Na+-dependent cation chloride cotransporters, which can mediate renal NaCl reabsorption and further control salt transport in osmotic cell volume regulation5,6,7, a critical process implicated in the pathogenesis of hypertension. Human STK39 is located on chromosome 2q24.3, comprises 18 exons and spans approximate 300 kb8. More than ten thousand single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are identified in STK39 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP/snp_ref.cgi?locusId=27347). Thereof, three intronic SNPs, rs6749447, rs35929607 and rs3754777, have been extensively evaluated in association with hypertension, yet with inconsistent and inconclusive findings, likely due to the genetic heterogeneity of populations selected, the possible small effect of single SNP on hypertensive risk, the relatively small sample size in individual studies, and the lack of evidence in populations other than Asian and White origins3,9,10. To help clarify this issue, we set out to conduct a systematic meta-analysis to better evaluate the risk prediction for primary hypertension in relation to three aforementioned SNPs in STK39, according to the guidelines listed in the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) statement (for more information, please visit the website http://www.prisma-statement.org/).

Results

Out of 42 potentially eligible articles identified from the extensive literature search, 9 articles that satisfied the pre-set inclusion criteria were pooled in this meta-analysis3,4,8,9,10,11,12,13,14. The PRISMA flow chart detailing the selection of qualified articles is shown in Fig. 1. Eight of 9 qualified articles were published in English language, and one in Chinese language11. Two articles that included 4 and 2 independent studies were analyzed separately4,8. Therefore, there were 13 qualified independent studies in the final analysis, including 5, 6 and 9 studies for rs6749447 (patients/controls: 3223/3354), rs35929607 (patients/controls: 18993/9781) and rs3754777 (patients/controls: 5865/5962) in association with hypertension, respectively. The average minor allele frequencies of rs6749447, rs35929607 and rs3754777 were 27.02%, 32.32% and 23.58% in patients and 23.18%, 35.89% and 20.92% in controls, respectively. The demographic characteristics and the lipid profiles of all study populations are presented in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. The genotype accounts of three examined SNPs in STK39 between patients and controls are summarized in Supplementary Table S1.

Figure 1. The PRISMA flow chart with the selection of qualified articles.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Table 1. The demographic characteristics of all qualified populations.

Author (year) Race Design Source Genotyping Sample size
 Age (years)
 Male
 BMI (kg/m2)
Patients Controls Patients Controls Patients Controls Patients Controls
Ren et al.11 Asian RD PB Sequencing 300 300 NR NR NR NR NR NR
Zhao et al.9 Asian RD HB LDR 1009 756 64.48 (8.53) 64.23 (10.13) 0.543 0.538 27.89 (6.29) 23.18 (3.77)
Xu et al.9 Asian RD PB GenomeLab 1024 1024 57.23 (7.24) 57.01 (7.39) 0.436 0.436 24.65 (3.25) 23.22 (2.88)
Umedani et al.12 Asian RD PB RFLP 74 454 37.08 (16.42) 0.520 NR NR
Shin et al.10 Asian RD PB TaqMan 238 260 50.00 (45–55) 51.00 (45–57) 0.496 0.504 NR NR
Maatta et al.13 White PD PB RFLP 447 771 50.00 (0.0) 50.00 (0.0) 0.600 0.570 28.60 (5.1) 25.40 (3.6)
Chen et al. (SY) M (2012) Asian RD HB Sequencing 335 365 56.81 (10.79) 57.01 (12.06) 1.000 1.000 25.01 (3.14) 23.81 (3.18)
Chen et al. (SY) F (2012) Asian RD HB Sequencing 266 244 59.39 (9.60) 56.52 (11.60) 0.000 0.000 24.97 (3.54) 23.39 (3.18)
Chen et al. (HLJ) M (2012) Asian RD HB Sequencing 1330 1641 56.99 (10.76) 57.69 (10.57) 1.000 1.000 25.39 (3.19) 24.20 (3.20)
Chen et al. (HLJ) F (2012) Asian RD HB Sequencing 815 812 61.75 (9.05) 58.52 (8.80) 0.000 0.000 25.14 (3.49) 23.82 (3.38)
Niu et al.14 Asian RD HB LDR 548 560 NR NR NR NR NR NR
Fava et al. (MDC) (2011) White PD PB EPF 3565 2070 57.50 (5.9) 0.417 25.90 (4.0)
Fava et al. (MPP) (2011) White PD PB EPF 12773 4917 68.20 (5.8) 0.633 27.20 (4.1)
Open in a new tab

Notes: RD, retrospective design; PD, prospective design; PB, population-based; HB, hospital-based; LDR, ligase detection reaction; RFLP, restriction fragment length polymorphism; EPF, endpoint fluorescent; BMI, body mass index; M, male; F, female; NR, not reported. Data are expressed either as mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range) or percentage.

Table 2. The lifestyle and lipid characteristics of all qualified populations.

Author (year) Smoking
 Drinking
 Glucose (mmol/L)
 TG (mmol/L)
 TC (mmol/L)
 HDL-C (mmol/L)
Patients Controls Patients Controls Patients Controls Patients Controls Patients Controls Patients Controls
Ren et al.11 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
Zhao et al.9 NR NR NR NR 6.14 (2.15) 5.33 (1.12) 1.90 (1.04) 1.77 (0.95) 4.59 (1.18) 4.59 (0.91) 1.12 (0.32) 1.24 (0.34)
Xu et al.3 0.189 0.164 0.229 0.192 NR NR 2.02 (1.69) 1.64 (1.12) 5.34 (1.01) 5.18 (0.93) 1.41 (0.35) 1.40 (0.32)
Umedani et al.12 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
Shin et al.10 NR NR NR NR 4.72 (4.33–5.22) 4.56 (4.33–4.94) 1.38 (0.96–2.03) 1.16 (0.87–1.78) 5.07 (4.53–5.69) 5.15 (4.53–5.82) 1.22 (0.98–1.50) 1.29 (1.09–1.55)
Maatta et al.13 NR NR NR NR NR NR 1.50 (1.2) 1.20 (0.7) 5.40 (1.0) 5.40 (1.0) 1.60 (0.4) 1.70 (0.4)
Chen et al. (SY) M (2012) 0.639 0.514 0.371 0.249 6.37 (2.22) 6.18 (1.86) NR NR NR NR NR NR
Chen et al. (SY) F (2012) 0.090 0.107 0.080 0.021 6.61 (2.36) 5.61 (1.62) NR NR NR NR NR NR
Chen et al. (HLJ) M (2012) 0.593 0.525 0.473 0.405 6.56 (2.22) 6.27 (2.20) NR NR NR NR NR NR
Chen et al. (HLJ) F (2012) 0.098 0.091 0.017 0.023 6.71 (2.39) 6.03 (1.87) NR NR NR NR NR NR
Niu et al.14. NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
Fava et al. (MDC) (2011) 0.276 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
Fava et al. (MPP) (2011) 0.372 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
Open in a new tab

Notes: TG, triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; M, male; F, female; NR, not reported. Data are expressed either as mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range) or percentage.

As discrete genotype counts are not usually available in some studies, only alleles were calculated and pooled in this meta-analysis (Fig. 2). Overall, there was no indication of three examined SNPs in susceptibility to hypertension (for rs6749447, rs35929607 and rs3754777: OR = 1.27, 0.95 and 1.21; P = 0.270, 0.507 and 0.153, respectively), and there were significant heterogeneity (I2 > 80%). In addition, considering the high misclassification rate of restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) method used by two studies12,13, we conducted a sensitivity analysis by excluding these two studies and there were no changes for the effect-size estimates. To find the potential causes of significant heterogeneity, meta-regression analyses modeling race, study design, control source, age, gender, body mass index, smoking, drinking, fasting glucose, triglyceride, total cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol as independent variables were done. It is of interest to note that smoking was a significant risk factor for the association between rs3754777 and hypertension, as presented in Fig. 3. With the higher percentage of hypertensive smokers, the effect-size estimates of rs3754777 on hypertension risk became more obvious (regression coefficient: 0.34, P = 0.017).

Figure 2. The forest plots of allele comparisons for three examined SNPs.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Figure 3. The regression of smoking on individual effect-size estimates of rs3754777 for hypertension risk.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

As shown in the Begg’s and Filled funnel plots (Fig. 4), as well as Egger’s tests, there were low probabilities of publication bias for rs6749447 (PEgger = 0.955), rs35929607 (PEgger = 0.187), and rs3754777 (PEgger = 0.986), and there were no missing studies as indicated by the Filled funnel plots in Fig. 4.

Figure 4. The Begg’s (the left panel) and Filled (the right panel) funnel plots of three examined SNPs.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Discussion

The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the risk prediction of three promising SNPs, rs6749447, rs35929607 and rs3754777 in STK39, for primary hypertension, and none of these SNPs contributed to the significant risk of hypertension. Even though, it is of interest to note that rs3754777 might interact with smoking to make individuals more susceptible to experience hypertension. To our knowledge, this is so far the most comprehensive meta-analysis pivoting STK39 genetic alterations and hypertension risk from medical literature.

A previous meta-analysis by Xi et al. examined only rs3754777 in STK39 along with its strongly-linked proxies (rs2063958 and rs35929607), and found that rs3754777 was a significant risk factor for primary hypertension in populations of Caucasian and East Asian ancestries15. The present updated meta-analysis, however, failed to reproduce this significant finding, as well as for the proxy SNP rs35929607 selected by Xi et al.15. There are several possible reasons for this divergence, and the first one is that the overall and subgroup estimates in the Xi’s meta-analysis were based on individual effect-sizes of different genetic models of inheritance15, which might introduce an analytical bias. To clear this confusion, only allelic model was implemented in the present meta-analysis. Another possibility lies in the incorporation of proxy SNPs in the Xi’s meta-analysis15, as the strong linkage disequilibrium in one ethnic group cannot necessarily be extrapolated to that in another ethnic group16. For instance in the Xi’s meta-analysis, rs2063958 was indexed as a proxy for rs3754777 (D’ = 0.98)15; however as indicated by HaploReg v2 (http://www.broadinstitute.org/mammals/haploreg/haploreg.php), rs2390639 is a more suitable candidate to surrogate rs3754777 as their linkage disequilibrium coefficient D’ reached 0.99. However, the two SNPs, rs2063958 and rs2390639 in the study by Kidambi et al.17 showed no sign of linkage disequilibrium. A third possibility was that there were duplicated study samples in the Xi’s meta-analysis15, such as the MPP study population at baseline and follow-up in the study by Fava et al.4. To overcome these drawbacks, we separately analyzed the individual contributions of three widely-evaluated SNPs in STK39 to hypertension, and no observable significance was noticed, suggesting that multiple SNPs in STK39 mediate blood pressure regulation, with each exerting small effects under a certain environmental condition.

It is worth noting in this study our meta-regression analyses suggested a possible interaction between rs3754777 and smoking in predisposition to hypertension. There is a wide recognition that smoking is an established risk factor for hypertension18,19. However, a literature search failed to reveal any biological or epidemiological evidence for this interaction. Elucidating the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying rs3754777 and hypertension associated with smoking is beyond the scope of the present study, and it is rational to assume that rs3754777 may influence, under a smoking condition, the functional activation of STK39 gene, and further control the salt transport.

Several drawbacks for the present meta-analysis need to be acknowledged. First, the sample size in this study is not large enough to ensure adequate statistical power for obtaining a convincing estimate. Second, only hypertension as a binary trait was analyzed and blood pressure as a continuous trait was not due to the insufficient data across qualified studies. Third, the conclusion of this study was merely based on case-controls studies, which might hinder the perhaps cause-effect relationship. Fourth, in spite of no indication of publication bias, there was strong evidence of between-study heterogeneity, and interpreting heterogeneity is still a challenge, as with a majority of meta-analyses20. Considering the limited number of studies involved, further subgroup analyses were not conducted, and further large, well-designed studies are required to fully address this issue.

Taken together, we through a comprehensive meta-analysis concluded that STK39 might not be a hypertension-susceptibility gene. Future studies should incorporate various lifestyle and environmental risk factors such as smoking and drinking in genetic estimation models to precisely define the role of specific genetic variants.

Methods

Search strategy

Four databases including Medline (PubMed since 1966), Embase (Excerpta Medica Database since 1980), Wanfang (www.wanfangdata.com.cn/, a Chinese database since 1966) and CNKI (www.cnki.net/, a Chinese database since 1979) were looked through to find studies that were aimed to explore the associations of STK39 genetic variants with hypertension in human beings on October 25, 2015. The language of qualified articles was confined to English or Chinese. This search process was independently run by two authors (Hualing Yang and Lingyang Ye) on the basis of predefined key terms. Search results were combined with the removal of any duplicate articles.

Study selection

The title and/or abstract of each article were checked to ensure whether the topic of interest was included, and in case of uncertainty the full text was reviewed according to bespoke selection criteria. Included articles must simultaneously satisfy the following constraints (a) primary hypertension as the clinical endpoint; (b) case-control study design; (c) one or more SNPs of rs6749447, rs35929607 and rs3754777 under investigation; (d) detailed genotype or allele frequencies for examined SNPs between cases and controls. The selection process was completed by two independent authors (Hualing Yang and Lingyang Ye), and any disagreement was resolved through discussion.

Data abstraction

From each qualified article, relevant data were abstracted by Hualing Yang and subsequently checked by Lingyang Ye, and all data were entered into a predetermined Excel spreadsheet, including the first author’s surname, year of publication, race of study subjects, study design, control source, genotyping method, a list of SNPs under study, genotype or allele counts, sample size, age, male proportion, body mass index, smoking, drinking, fasting glucose, triglyceride, total cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Statistical analysis

Individual effect-size estimates of STK39 three SNPs for hypertension risk were pooled in a random-effects model, and odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated by the DerSimonian and Laird method21. Between-study heterogeneity was measured by the magnitude of I2 value in terms of percentage, and significant heterogeneity was reported if the I2 value is greater than 50%, with higher values indicating stronger heterogeneity22. Sources of heterogeneity were explored by meta-regression analysis. The probability of publication bias was visually inspected by Begg’s funnel plots and statistically assessed by Egger’s tests at a significance level of 0.1023. In addition, the trim-and-fill method was employed to assess publication bias, and this method can be used for estimating and adjusting for the number and outcomes of missing studies in a meta-analysis24. The STATA 13.0 software was used to handle all statistical analyses.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Yang, H. et al. A meta-analytical assessment of STK39 three well-defined polymorphisms in susceptibility to hypertension. Sci. Rep. 6, 25290; doi: 10.1038/srep25290 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep25290-s1.pdf (9.8KB, pdf)

Footnotes

Author Contributions Z.W. and H.Y. conceived and designed the study; H.Y. and L.Y. performed the study; H.Y. and L.Y. analyzed the data; Q.W., D.C., Q.C. and H.P. contributed materials/analysis tools; H.Y. and Z.W. wrote and revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript prior to submission.

References

  1. Wang Y. et al. From the Cover: Whole-genome association study identifies STK39 as a hypertension susceptibility gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106, 226–231 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Persu A. et al. 6c.05: Stk39 and Wnk1 Are Potential Hypertension Susceptibility Genes in the Belhypgen Cohort. J Hypertens 33 Suppl 1, e80 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Xu J. et al. Lack of association between STK39 and hypertension in the Chinese population. J Hum Hypertens 27, 294–297 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fava C. et al. Serine/threonine kinase 39 is a candidate gene for primary hypertension especially in women: results from two cohort studies in Swedes. J Hypertens 29, 484–491 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Moriguchi T. et al. WNK1 regulates phosphorylation of cation-chloride-coupled cotransporters via the STE20-related kinases, SPAK and OSR1. J Biol Chem 280, 42685–42693 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Delpire E. & Gagnon K. B. SPAK and OSR1: STE20 kinases involved in the regulation of ion homoeostasis and volume control in mammalian cells. Biochem J 409, 321–331 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ahmed M. et al. SPAK Sensitive Regulation of the Epithelial Na Channel ENaC. Kidney Blood Press Res 40, 335–343 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen L. Y. et al. STK39 is an independent risk factor for male hypertension in Han Chinese. Int J Cardiol 154, 122–127 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhao H. et al. Interactive contribution of serine/threonine kinase 39 gene multiple polymorphisms to hypertension among northeastern Han Chinese. Sci Rep 4, 5116 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Shin D. J., Lee S. H., Park S. & Jang Y. Association between Serine/Threonine Kinase 39 Gene Polymorphism, Hypertension, and Other Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Koreans. Korean Circ J 43, 13–22 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ren H., Zhao L., Wang L. & Wang Z. Relationship between STK39 gene polymorphisms and essential hypertension in Kazak in Xinjiang. Medical Information 28, 51–52 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  12. Umedani L. V., Chaudhry B., Mehraj V. & Ishaq M. Serene threonine kinase 39 gene single nucleotide A-G polymorphism rs35929607 is weakly associated with essential hypertension in population of Tharparkar, Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc 63, 199–205 (2013). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Maatta K. M., Nikkari S. T., Lahteela K. H., Palmroos P. B. & Kunnas T. A. A functional variant in the serine-threonine kinase coding gene is associated with hypertension: a case-control study in a Finnish population, the Tampere adult population cardiovascular risk study. J Hypertens 31, 516–520 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Niu W. Q., Zhang Y., Ji K. D., Gao P. J. & Zhu D. L. Contribution of five top whole-genome association signals to hypertension in Han Chinese. J Hum Hypertens 25, 278–280 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Xi B. et al. STK39 polymorphism is associated with essential hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 8, e59584, (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Yu K. et al. Methionine synthase A2756G polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Eur J Hum Genet 18, 370–378 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kidambi S. et al. Non-replication study of a genome-wide association study for hypertension and blood pressure in African Americans. BMC Med Genet 13, 27 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dochi M. et al. Smoking as an independent risk factor for hypertension: a 14-year longitudinal study in male Japanese workers. Tohoku J Exp Med 217, 37–43 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. D’Elia L. et al. Not smoking is associated with lower risk of hypertension: results of the Olivetti Heart Study. Eur J Public Health 24, 226–230 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kim D. H., Kim C., Ding E. L., Townsend M. K. & Lipsitz L. A. Adiponectin levels and the risk of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertension 62, 27–32 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. DerSimonian R. & Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7, 177–188 (1986). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Higgins J. P., Thompson S. G., Deeks J. J. & Altman D. G. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327, 557–560 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Bowden J., Tierney J. F., Copas A. J. & Burdett S. Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of RCTs using standard and generalised Q statistics. BMC Med Res Methodol 11, 41 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Duval S. & Tweedie R. Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 56, 455–463 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep25290-s1.pdf (9.8KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES