Skip to main content
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine logoLink to Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
. 2015 Jan 25;29(1):214–224. doi: 10.1111/jvim.12528

Insulin‐Like Growth Factor—Phosphatidylinositol 3 Kinase Signaling in Canine Cortisol‐Secreting Adrenocortical Tumors

MMJ Kool 1, S Galac 1,, N van der Helm 1, S Corradini 2, HS Kooistra 1, JA Mol 1
PMCID: PMC4858057  PMID: 25619516

Abstract

Background

Hypercortisolism is a common endocrine disorder in dogs, caused by a cortisol‐secreting adrenocortical tumor (AT) in approximately 15% of cases. In adrenocortical carcinomas of humans, activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K) signaling pathway by insulin‐like growth factor (IGF) signaling represents a promising therapeutic target.

Objectives

To investigate the involvement of PI3K signaling in the pathogenesis of ATs in dogs and to identify pathway components that may hold promise as future therapeutic targets or as prognostic markers.

Animals

Analyses were performed on 36 canine cortisol‐secreting ATs (11 adenomas and 25 carcinomas) and 15 normal adrenal glands of dogs.

Methods

mRNA expression analysis was performed for PI3K target genes, PI3K inhibitor phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), IGFs, IGF receptors, IGF binding proteins and epidermal growth factor receptors. Mutation analysis was performed on genes encoding PTEN and PI3K catalytic subunit (PIK3CA).

Results

Target gene expression indicated PI3K activation in carcinomas, but not in adenomas. No amino acid‐changing mutations were detected in PTEN or PIK3CA and no significant alterations in IGF‐II or IGFR1 expression were detected. In carcinomas, ERBB2 expression tended to be higher than in normal adrenal glands, and higher expression of inhibitor of differentiation 1 and 2 (ID1 and ID2) was detected in carcinomas with recurrence within 2.5 years after adrenalectomy.

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

Based on these results, ERBB2 might be a promising therapeutic target in ATs in dogs, whereas ID1 and 2 might be valuable as prognostic markers and therapeutic targets.

Keywords: Adrenal, Dog, Hypercortisolism, Insulin‐like growth factor, Phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase


Abbreviations

ACC

adrenocortical carcinoma

AT

adrenocortical tumor

BCL2L1

B‐cell lymphoma 2 related protein

CCND1

cyclin D1

EGF

epidermal growth factor

EGFR

epidermal growth factor receptor

ERBB

erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog

GUSB

beta‐glucuronidase

HPRT

hypoxantine phosphoribosiltransferase

ID

inhibitor of differentiation

IGFBP

insulin‐like growth factor binding protein

IGF

insulin‐like growth factor

IGFR

insulin‐like growth factor receptor

INSR

insulin receptor

mTOR

mammalian target of rapamycin

p‐AKT

phosphorylated AKT

PI3K

phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase

PIK3CA

phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase catalytic subunit

PTEN

phosphatase and tensin homolog

qPCR

quantitative RT‐PCR

RPS19

ribosomal protein S19

RPS5

ribosomal protein S5

SGK1

serum glucocorticoid regulated kinase 1

SNAI1

snail

SNAI2

slug

SPRP

small proline rich protein

TRAIL

tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 10

UTR

untranslated region

XIAP

X‐linked inhibitor of apoptosis

Hypercortisolism is 1 of the most common endocrine disorders in dogs.1 Approximately, 15% of spontaneous cases of hypercortisolism in dogs are due to cortisol‐secreting adrenocortical adenomas or carcinomas.1 Therapeutic options for dogs with adrenocortical tumors (ATs) are limited: complete adrenalectomy of the affected adrenal gland is the treatment of choice, provided no metastases are present at the time of presentation.2, 3 However, surgery is not possible or successful in all cases, and tumor recurrence and metastasis occur regularly.4 Options for medical management are limited to mitotane, a chemotherapeutic agent, or trilostane, which can only alleviate the clinical signs of hypercortisolism. The lack of reliable prognostic markers further complicates treatment.

A pathway with the potential to provide both therapeutic targets and prognostic markers is the phosphatidylinositol‐3‐kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway (Fig 1). The PI3K pathway is 1 of the most frequently activated signal transduction pathways in cancers of humans, the activation of which also has been documented in ATs in humans.5, 6, 7 Pathway activation is initiated by receptor tyrosine kinases, such as the type 1 insulin‐like growth factor (IGF) receptor (IGFR1) or dimers of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor family (EGFR, ERBB2–4), and counteracted by the competitive PI3K inhibitor phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN). Upon activation of the PI3K pathway, phosphorylated AKT (p‐AKT) and its downstream effectors stimulate cell proliferation, survival and growth by transcriptional and posttranslational mechanisms.5

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic representation of the phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K) signaling pathway. Upon ligand binding, the epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR and ERBB 2–4) form homo‐ and heterodimers, activating their tyrosine kinase domain. The IGF receptors (IGFR1 and IGFR2) are activated by the binding of insulin‐like growth factor (IGF) I or II. IGF actions are modulated by high affinity IGF binding proteins (IGFBP 2–6). IGFR1 and the EGF receptors relay their intracellular signal to PI3K, which converts the inactive PIP2 to the active PIP3. Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) counters PI3K action by converting PIP3 back to PIP2. PIP3 production leads to the phosphorylation of AKT to phospho‐AKT (P‐AKT), which in turn activates SGK1 and XIAP through phosphorylation, while it induces mRNA expression of target genes ID1, ID2, SNAI1, SNAI2, BCL2L1 and CCND1, and inhibits mRNA expression of TRAIL. Through its target genes, activation of the PI3K pathway results in increased cell survival, proliferation and growth. Target genes for qPCR analysis in this study are indicated in dark gray. SGK1, serum glucocorticoid regulated kinase 1; XIAP, X‐linked inhibitor of apoptosis; ID1, inhibitor of differentiation 1; ID2, inhibitor of differentiation 2; SNAI1, snail; SNAI2, slug; BCL2L1, B‐cell lymphoma 2 related protein; CCND1, cyclin D1; TRAIL, tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 10.

The PI3K pathway contains multiple targets for therapeutic intervention, the choice of which depends on the mode of activation. In adrenocortical carcinomas (ACC) of humans, frequent overexpression of IGF‐II and IGFR1 indicates IGF‐signaling as a likely mode for PI3K activation.8, 9, 10 Selective IGFR1 kinase inhibitors thus could be of benefit, and indeed have shown antitumor effects both in cell culture studies and preclinical and early phase clinical trials in humans with ACC.6, 10 For EGFR‐induced PI3K pathway activation, several specific inhibitors already have been approved for clinical use in humans.11 Activation of the PI3K pathway also may occur downstream of the receptors, for instance as a result of mutations in the genes encoding PTEN or the PI3K catalytic subunit (PIK3CA) or because of decreased expression of PTEN.12, 13 In these cases, single or dual inhibitors of PIK3CA and mTOR could be employed.14 In a human ACC cell line, use of these compounds has resulted in decreased cell proliferation and cortisol secretion.15, 16

In ACC of humans, IGF‐II is the most frequently and strongly overexpressed gene,17, 18 whereas in adenomas overexpression occurs only rarely.18, 19 Additionally, high IGF‐II expression in ACC of humans is associated with aggressive tumor behavior and increased risk of metastasis.20, 21 Therefore, in humans IGF‐II is a diagnostic and prognostic marker for ATs.

The aim of this study was to investigate involvement of the PI3K signaling pathway in the pathogenesis of cortisol‐secreting ATs in dogs, to identify pathway components that may hold promise as future therapeutic targets or may serve as prognostic markers. Pathway activation was evaluated by means of target gene expression analysis, whereas mRNA expression analysis and mutation analysis were used to indicate mode of activation.

Materials and Methods

Patient Material

Patient material used in this study consisted of 36 cortisol‐secreting ATs from dogs and 15 whole tissue explants of normal canine adrenal glands. All normal adrenal glands from healthy dogs were available as archived tissue for comparison with AT tissue obtained from patients. The tumor group consisted of histologically confirmed ATs from patients with clinical signs of hypercortisolism, referred to the Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine in Utrecht between 2001 and 2012. The diagnosis of ACTH‐independent hypercortisolism because of a cortisol‐secreting AT was based upon (1) increased urinary corticoid‐to‐creatinine ratios, that were not suppressible with high doses of dexamethasone, (2) suppressed or undetectable basal plasma ACTH concentrations1 and (3) demonstration of an AT by ultrasonography, computed tomography or both.22 All dogs subsequently underwent unilateral adrenalectomy. The dogs’ ages at the time of surgery ranged from 2 to 12 years (mean, 9 years). Seven dogs were mongrels and the other dogs were of 22 different breeds. Eighteen of the dogs were male (8 castrated) and 18 female (12 spayed).

After resection, all ATs and normal adrenal glands were immediately put on ice for inspection, and material was saved for quantitative RT‐PCR (qPCR) analysis and histopathology. Fragments for RNA isolation were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen within 10 minutes after resection and stored at −80°C until further use. The remaining part of the tissue was immersed in formalin for fixation and embedded in paraffin after 24–48 hours. Permission to use the AT tissue for this study was obtained from all patient owners and the study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Utrecht University.

Histopathology

Histopathological evaluation was performed on formalin‐fixed and paraffin‐embedded tissue slides of all samples and used to confirm the diagnosis and classify the tumors. All histological evaluations were performed by a single pathologist. Classification was performed based on criteria described previously.23 Classification as a carcinoma was based on histological evidence of vascular invasion, peripheral fibrosis, capsular invasion, trabecular growth, hemorrhage, necrosis, and single cell necrosis. Typical histological characteristics of adenomas were hematopoiesis, fibrin thrombi, and cytoplasmic vacuolization. Based on these criteria, the tumor group consisted of 11 adenomas and 25 carcinomas.

Follow‐up

Of the dogs in the tumor group, follow‐up information was available for 15 dogs with histologically confirmed carcinomas: 7 of these dogs developed signs of hypercortisolism within 2.5 years after surgical removal of the tumor. Recurrence of hypercortisolism was confirmed by endocrine testing, and was caused by metastases in 6 of these dogs, and by regrowth of the AT in 1 dog. The remaining 8 dogs were in remission for at least 2.5 years after adrenalectomy.

Total RNA Extraction and Reverse Transcription

Total RNA for quantitative RT‐PCR analysis was isolated from the adrenal tissue using the RNeasy mini kit,1 according to manufacturer's protocols. An additional DNAse step was performed to avoid genomic DNA contamination. RNA concentrations were measured on the NanoDrop ND‐1000.2 Synthesis of cDNA was performed using the iScript cDNA synthesis kit,3 according to the manufacturer's protocols. For all samples, 1 cDNA reaction was performed without reverse transcriptase (RT−), to check for contamination with genomic DNA.

Quantitative RT‐PCR

Primers for qPCR were designed to detect the mRNA expression levels of PI3K pathway target genes (Table 1), PI3K pathway inhibitor PTEN and major components of the IGF and EGF axis (Table 2). Primer design was performed using Perl‐primer v1.1.14 according to the parameters in the Bio‐Rad iCycler manual, and primers were ordered from Eurogentec.4 For all primer pairs, a temperature gradient was performed to determine the optimal annealing temperature. Formation of the proper PCR products was confirmed by a sequencing reaction, using the ABI3130XL Genetic analyzer5 according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Table 1.

Quantitative RT‐PCR primer pairs for the detection of PI3K target genes: SNAI1, SNAI2, BCL2L1, ID1 and ID2, CCND1, SGK11, TNFSF10 or TRAIL, and XIAP. All positions are based on the mRNA sequence, as published on the NCBI website

qPCR Primers (Position) Sequence (5′–3′) Annealing Temperature (°C) Product Length (bp)
cf_SNAI1
Fw CAA GAT GCA CAT CCG AAG C 61.6 133
Rv CAG TGG GAG CAG GAA AAC
cf_SNAI2
Fw CTT CAC TCC GAC TCC AAA CG 60 148
Rv TGG ATT TTG TGC TCT TGC AG
cf_BCL2L1
Fw GGG GTG GTG AGG TAC AAA AA 61.6 112
Rv CTG GGT CTA GCG TCC AAA AG
cf_ID1
Fw CTC AAC GGC GAG ATC AG 59.5 135
Rv GAG CAC GGG TTC TTC TC
cf_ID2
Fw GCT GAA TAA ATG GTG TTC GTG 60.5 114
Rv GTT GTT CTC CTT GTG AAA TGG
cf_CCND1
Fw GCC TCG AAG ATG AAG GAG AC 60 117
Rv CAG TTT GTT CAC CAG GAG CA
cf_TNFSF10
Fw GCT GAT CCT CAT CTT CAC TG 62 90
Rv TCC TGC ATC TGC TTC AG
cf_SGK11
Fw TGG GCC TGA ACG ACT TTA TT 62 124
Rv GAG GGG TTG GCA TTC ATA AG
cf_XIAP
Fw ACT ATG TAT CAC TTG AGG CTC TGG TTT C 54 80
Rv AGT CTG GCT TGA TTC ATC TTG TGT TAT G

Accession numbers used: SNAI1: XM_543048.1; SNAI2: XM_543048.1; CDH1: XM_536807.3; BCL2L1: NM_001003072.1; ID1: XM_847117.2; ID2: XR_134413.1; CCND1: NM_001005757.1; SGK11: XM_003432525.1; TNFSF10: NM_001130836; XIAP: XM_003435664.1.

PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase; SNAI1, snail; SNAI2, slug; BCL2L1, B‐cell lymphoma 2 related protein; ID1 and ID2, inhibitor of DNA binding 1 and 2; CCND1, CyclinD1; SGK11, serum/glucocorticoid regulated kinase 1; TNFSF10 or TRAIL, tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 10; XIAP, X‐linked inhibitor of apoptosis; Fw, forward primer; Rv, reverse primer.

Table 2.

qPCR primer pairs for the detection of genes encoding components of the IGF‐ and EGF axis, and PTEN: EGFR, ERBB2–4, PTEN, IGF‐I and IGF‐II, IGFR1 and IGFR2, IGFBP 2–6, and INSR. All positions are based on the mRNA sequence, as published on the NCBI website

qPCR Primers (Position) Sequence (5′–3′) Annealing Temperature (°C) Product Length (bp)
cf_EGFR
Fw CTG GAG CAT TCG GCA 53 107
Rv TGG CTT TGG GAG ACG
cf_ERBB2
Fw CGT GCT GGA CAA TGG AGA CC 64 126
Rv CCG CTG AAT CAA GAC CCC TC
cf_ERBB3
Fw TAG TGG TGA AGG ACA ACG GCA G 64 103
Rv GGT CTT GGT CAA TGT CTG GCA G
cf_ERBB4
Fw CAG TTC TTG TGT GCG TGC CTG 70 121
Rv ATG ATC CTG TGC CGA TGC C
cf_PTEN
Fw AGA TGT TAG TGA CAA TGA ACC T 62 101
Rv GTG ATT TGT GTG TGC TGA TC
cf_IGF‐I
Fw TGT CCT CCT CGC ATC TCT T 58 125
Rv GTC TCC GCA CAC GAA CTG
cf_IGF‐II
Fw CTT CTG GAG ACC TAC TGT GC 61 128
Rv CTG CTT CCA GGT GTC GTA TTG
cf_IGFR1
Fw CAT GCC TTG GTC TCC CTG T 60 129
Rv GGT GGT CCC AAT CCC AAA G
cf_IGFR2
Fw GAG TTC AGC CACG AGA C 54 94
Rv GCA TTG TCA CCA TCA AGG
cf_IGFBP2
Fw GAT CTC CAC CAT GCA CCT TC 60 127
Rv GCT GCC CGT TCA GAG ACA TCT TG
cf_IGFBP3
Fw CTG CAC ACG AAG ATG GAT GT 61 127
Rv TAT TCC GTC TCC CGC TTG TA
cf_IGFBP4
Fw AGC CTG CAG CCC TCT GAC A 59 120
Rv TGG TGC TGC GGT CTC GAA T
cf_IGFBP5
Fw TCG CAG AAA GAA GCT GAC C 60 131
Rv GAA GCC TCC ATG TGT CTG C
cf_IGFBP6
Fw CAA TCC TGG TGG TGT CC 54 136
Rv AGA AGC CCT TAT GGT CAC
cf_INSR
Fw GTG ACA GAC TAT TTA GAT GTC CC 60 166
Rv ACT CAG GGT TTG AAG AAG C

Accession numbers used: EGFR: XM_533073.3; ERBB2: NM_001003217.1; ERBB3: XM_538226.4; ERBB4: XM_003640190.2; PTEN: NM_001003192.1; IGF‐I: XM_848024.1; IGF‐II: XM_858107.1; IGFR1: XM_853622.1; IGF‐IIR: NM_001122602; IGFBP2: XM_545637.2; IGFBP3: XM_548740.2; IGFBP4: XM_845091.1; IGFBP5: XM_847792.1; IGFBP6: XM_844250; INSR: XM_542108.

EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ERBB2–4, erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2–4; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog; IGF‐I and IGF‐II, insulin‐like growth factor 1 and 2; IGFR1 and IGFR2, IFG receptor type 1 and 2; IGFBP 2–6, IGF binding protein 2–6; INSR, insulin receptor; Fw, forward primer; Rv, reverse primer.

For mRNA expression analysis of the EGF receptors, PI3K target genes and PTEN, a 10× diluted pool of cDNA samples was used to create a 4‐fold standard dilution series. The remaining cDNA was diluted 5 times with milliQ water, to achieve a working stock. Reactions were performed on a CFX384 real‐time PCR detection system.3 The following genes were measured as follows: EGF receptor (EGFR), erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2–4 (ERBB2–4), snail (SNAI1), slug (SNAI2), B‐cell lymphoma 2 related protein (BCL2L1), cyclinD1 (CCND1), inhibitor of differentiation 1 and 2 (ID1 and ID2), tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 10 (TNFSF10 or TRAIL), serum glucocorticoid regulated kinase 1 (SGK1), X‐linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) and PTEN. To correct for differences in cDNA concentration, ribosomal protein S5 (RPS5), RPS19, small proline rich protein (SPRP) and hypoxantine phosphoribosiltransferase (HPRT) were used as reference genes.24, 25

For mRNA expression analysis of IGF‐I, IGF‐II, IGFR1, IGFR2, IGF binding proteins (IGFBP 2–6) and the insulin receptor (INSR), an undiluted pool of cDNA samples was used to create a 4‐fold standard dilution series. The remainder of the cDNA was diluted 10 times with milliQ water, to achieve a working stock. Reactions were performed on a MyIQ single color real‐time PCR detection system.3 To correct for differences in cDNA concentration, RPS5, RPS19, SPRP and beta‐glucuronidase (GUSB) were used as reference genes.24, 25

Detection was performed using SYBRgreen supermix3 and data were analyzed using CFX Manager 3.03 for the CFX384 real‐time PCR data and using iQ5 software3 for the MyIQ single color real‐time PCR data. The raw data were used to calculate the reaction efficiency. Reaction efficiencies between 90% and 110% were accepted. Analysis of the relative expression levels of the reference genes disclosed no significant differences among groups and reference gene expression was shown to be stable using GeNorm software,21 justifying the use as reference genes. Calculation of normalized relative expression levels for each of the target genes was performed using the 2−ΔΔCT method.26

Mutation Analysis

Mutation analysis was performed on PTEN and PIK3CA. Primers for PCR amplification (Table 3) and sequence primers (Table 4) were designed using Perl‐primer v1.1.14 according to BioRad iCycler parameters, and ordered from Eurogentec.4 Sequence primers were located along the entire transcript, at a distance of 300–500 bp apart, or closer together when needed for complete coverage. Amplification primers were located in the 3′ and 5′untranslated regions (UTRs) of the gene to ensure amplification of the complete coding region. For PTEN, the canine 3′ UTR is not annotated and was deduced from the human 3′ UTR and the canine genomic sequence. If a gene could not be amplified in 1 stretch, overlapping primer pairs were used. All amplification primers were tested on a pool of adrenal samples, to determine the optimal annealing temperature. Correct product formation was evaluated by means of gel electrophoresis and sequencing.

Table 3.

PCR primers pairs for amplification of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase, catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA). All positions are based on the mRNA sequence, as published on the NCBI website

PCR Primers (Position) Sequence (5′–3′) Annealing Temperature (°C) Product Length (bp)
cf_PTEN
Fw75 TCC TCC TTC CTC TCC AG 55 748
Rv822 TGA ACT TGT CTT CCC GTC
Fw718 CAA TGT TCA GTG GCG GA 55 743
Rv1460 CGA GAT TGG TCA GGA AGA G
cf_PIK3CA
F1 TTT CTG CTT TGG GAC AGC 55 1536
R1537 CTG GGA ACT TTA CCA CAC TG
Fw1438 TGC TGA ACC CTA TTG GTG 55 449
Rv1887 TAC AGT CCA GAA GCT CCA
Fw1516 GCA GTG TGG TAA AGT TCC 55 1843
Rv3359 CAG TCT TTG CCT GTT GAC

Accession numbers used: PTEN: NM_001003192.1; PIK3CA: XM_545208.3.

Fw, forward primer; Rv, reverse primer.

Table 4.

Sequencing primers for the mutation analysis of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase, catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA). All positions are based on the mRNA sequence, as published on the NCBI website

Sequence Primers (Position) Sequence (5′–3′)
cf_PTEN
Fw474 CAC TGT AAA GCT GGA AAG GG
Fw1157 TGT AGA GGA GCC ATC AAA CC
Rv249 CAA AGG GTT CAT TCT CTG GG
Rv595 TGT CTC TGG TCC TTA CTT CC
Rv1285 CCT GTA TAC GCC TTC AAG TC
cf_PIK3CA
Fw375 GTA ATT GAG CCA GTA GGC
Fw707 CAA CCA TGA CTG TGT TCC
Fw1153 TCT ATC ATG GAG GAG AAC CC
Fw1483 CTC CAT GCT TAG AGT TGG AG
Fw1767 CTA CCC AAA CTG CTT CTG
Fw2183 TAG GCA AGT TGA GGC TAT GG
Fw2582 TGG TTG TCT GTC AAT CGG
Fw2806 TGG GAA TTG GAG ATC GTC
Fw2963 GAT TAG TAA AGG AGC CCA GG
Rv358 AAA GCC GAA GGT CAC AAA GC
Rv730 GTT CTG GAA CAC AGT CAT GG
Rv1236 TAG CCA TTC ATT CCA CCT GG
Rv1750 CAC AAT AGT GTC TGT GGC TC
Rv2205 TTC CAT AGC CTC AAC TTG CC
Rv2642 GTG TGA GAA TTT CGC ACC
Rv2993 TTT GTG CAT TCC TGG GCT
Rv3271 CAT GCT GCT TAA TGG TGT GG

Accession numbers used: PTEN: NM_001003192.1; PIK3CA: XM_545208.3.

Fw, forward primer; Rv, reverse primer.

After PCR optimization, target genes in all samples were amplified on a C1000 Touch thermal cycler3 using Phusion Hot Start Flex DNA Polymerase.6 The PCR products were amplified for sequencing using the BigDye Terminator version 3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit7 and filtrated using Sephadex G‐50 Superfine.8 Sequencing reactions were performed on an ABI3130XL Genetic analyzer, according to the manufacturer's instructions. The sequences obtained were aligned to the NCBI consensus mRNA sequence using DNAstar Lasergene core suite 9.1 SeqMan software. Mutations altering the amino acid sequence were confirmed by repeat RNA extraction and sequencing in both sense and antisense directions.

Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS20.9 Because of the non‐normal distribution of most of the variables, the nonparametric Mann‐Whitney U‐test was used to compare mRNA expression levels among groups. The relative mRNA expression levels were compared between ATs (adenomas and carcinomas) and normal adrenals and between ATs with and without recurrent disease. For the first comparison, a Bonferroni correction was applied and P < .025 was considered significant, whereas for the latter comparison, a P < .05 was considered significant.

Results

Relative mRNA Expression of PI3K Target Genes

To evaluate whether activation of the PI3K pathway was present in cortisol‐secreting ATs of dogs, mRNA expression analysis was performed on a selection of 10 known target genes of the pathway. Based on the literature, PI3K activation would increase mRNA expression of ID1,27, 28 ID2,29 SNAI1 and SNAI2,30 CCND1 and BCL2L1.31 In contrast, lower mRNA expression of TRAIL 31, 32 would be expected (Fig 1). The activation of SGK1 and XIAP occurs by means of phosphorylation; so for these genes, no effect on mRNA expression would be expected33, 34 (Fig 1). In ACC of dogs, the relative mRNA expression levels when compared to those in normal adrenal glands (Fig 2A) were significantly higher for ID1 (2.1‐fold, = .021) and SNAI1 (1.8‐fold, = .024), and significantly lower for SGK1 (0.5‐fold, = .009). The relative mRNA expression of TRAIL (0.6‐fold, = .028) tended to be lower. Thus, in carcinomas 3 of the 7 transcriptionally regulated target genes showed a change in accordance with pathway activation, whereas the mRNA expression of the other genes remained unchanged.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Box‐and‐whisker plot describing the relative mRNA expression of phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase target genes in 37 canine adrenocortical tumors (ATs) and 15 normal adrenal glands, as measured by qPCR and calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method. Relative expression in adenomas and carcinomas when compared to normal adrenal glands (A). Relative expression in ATs with recurrence within 2.5 years after adrenalectomy, when compared with ATs remaining in remission for at least 2.5 years (B). Significant changes (< .05 for A and P < .025 for B) are marked with an asterisk. N, normal adrenal gland; C, adrenocortical carcinoma; A, adrenocortical adenoma; SNAI1, snail; SNAI2, slug; BCL2L1, B‐cell lymphoma 2 related protein; ID1 and ID2, inhibitor of DNA binding 1 and 2; CCND1, CyclinD1; SGK11, serum/glucocorticoid regulated kinase 1; TNFSF1, tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 10; XIAP, X‐linked inhibitor of apoptosis.

In adenomas, the mRNA expression of none of the genes showed a significant change consistent with PI3K pathway activation (Fig 2A). The only significant finding was a lower relative expression of CCND1 (0.42‐fold, = .004) when compared to that of normal adrenal glands.

When comparing dogs with recurrent disease within 2.5 years to dogs remaining in remission (Fig 2B), a significantly higher expression of both ID1 (2.0‐fold, = .033) and ID2 (2.4‐fold, = .019) was detected in dogs with recurrent disease. No significant changes were detected in the expression of other target genes.

Relative mRNA Expression of PTEN and the Components of IGF and EGF Signaling

To evaluate for a potential cause of PI3K activation, mRNA expression levels of the components of the IGF axis, the EGF receptors and PI3K‐inhibitor PTEN were evaluated. Analysis of the components of the IGF axis in carcinomas (Fig 3A) disclosed a significantly higher expression of IGFBP2 (5.8‐fold, = .001) and a significantly lower expression of IGFBP5 (0.5‐fold, = .001). Likewise, in adenomas, IGFBP2 expression was significantly higher (7.2‐fold, = .013) and IGFBP5 expression was significantly lower (0.4‐fold, < .001). No significant differences in the expression levels of IGF‐II or the IGFR1 were detected.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Box‐and‐whisker plot describing the relative mRNA expression of genes encoding components of the IGF‐ and EGF axis, and PTEN in 37 canine ATs and 15 normal adrenal glands, as measured by qPCR and calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method. Relative expression in adenomas and carcinomas when compared to normal adrenal glands (A). Relative expression in ATs with recurrence within 2.5 years after adrenalectomy, when compared with ATs remaining in remission for at least 2.5 years (B). Significant changes (< .05 for A and < .025 for B) are marked with an asterisk. N, normal adrenal gland; C, adrenocortical carcinoma; A, adrenocortical adenoma; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog; IGF‐I and 2, insulin like growth factor 1 and 2; IGFR1, IFG receptor type 1; IGF‐IIR, IGF receptor type 2; IGFBP2–6, IGF binding protein 1–6; INSR, insulin receptor; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ERBB2–4, erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2–4.

Analysis of the EGF receptors in carcinomas identified a tendency to higher ERBB2 expression (1.7‐fold, = .027) and significantly lower expression of ERBB3 (0.4‐fold, = .003). In adenomas, the only significant change was lower ERBB3 expression (0.2‐fold, = .001).

When comparing dogs with recurrent disease within 2.5 years to dogs remaining in remission (Fig 3B), significantly higher expression of IGF‐I (2.7‐fold, = .042), IGFBP5 (6.8‐fold, = .042) and INSR (2.3‐fold, = .040) was detected.

Mutation Analysis of PTEN and PIK3CA

To determine whether inactivating mutations of PTEN or activating mutations of PIK3CA might be responsible for activation of the PI3K pathway, mutation analysis was performed. Mutation analysis of PTEN identified the presence of 1 silent mutation in codon 325 (CTC>CTT), which was present in 6 ATs and occurred in both homo‐ and hetero‐zygous form. No amino acid‐changing mutations were detected in of any of the ATs.

Mutation analysis of PIK3CA identified the presence of 3 different heterozygous silent mutations (codon 149 CCA>CCC, codon 438 TCT>TCA and codon 842 GTG>GTT) in 3 different ATs. No amino acid‐changing mutations were detected in any of the ATs.

Discussion

In this study, we aimed to investigate activation of the PI3K pathway in cortisol‐secreting adrenocortical adenomas and carcinomas of dogs, to identify both potential therapeutic targets and prognostic markers for use in dogs with ATs. The presence of PI3K activation was assessed by means of target gene expression analysis. In adenomas, none of the target genes showed a significant change consistent with PI3K pathway activation, and there was even a significantly lower expression of CCND1. This may be explained by the fact that adrenocortical adenomas, based on histological characteristics and tumor behavior, are a highly differentiated tumor type, and repression of CCND1 expression is thought to be a hallmark of cell differentiation.35 In line with this reasoning, lower CCND1 expression was detected in adrenocortical adenomas of humans when compared to carcinomas.36 In contrast, in ACC of dogs all target genes that showed significant alteration in mRNA expression were altered in accordance with PI3K activation.

The main modes of activation of the PI3K pathway are by intracellular alterations of signaling pathway components or through receptor tyrosine kinase signaling. With regard to intracellular pathway alterations, activating mutations of PIK3CA and inactivating mutations of PTEN are well‐documented.14 In this study, no amino acid‐changing mutations were detected in either PIK3CA or PTEN and no overall decreased expression of PTEN was detected in ATs.

With regard to receptor tyrosine kinase induced activation, 1 of the most strongly documented changes that can activate the PI3K pathway in ACC of humans, is activation of the IGF axis. Several studies have demonstrated that in ACC of humans, IGF‐II is the most overexpressed gene.19, 37 In the healthy individual, 1 of the alleles of the IGF‐II locus is epigenetically silenced postnatally, but in ACC genetic and epigenetic alterations in the 11p15 locus cause both alleles to be active, resulting in IGF‐II overexpression.17 Likewise, high IGF‐II protein expression is characteristic of ACC in humans.17, 18 The mechanism by which high IGF‐II expression leads to activation of the PI3K pathway is by binding IGFR1, which like IGF‐II frequently shows increased expression in ACC of humans.8, 9 Taken together, these data suggest that in ACC of humans changes in the IGF axis could be responsible for PI3K activation. This notion is supported by studies in H295R human adrenocortical carcinoma cells, in which IGF‐II – IGFR1 signaling results in an increase in p‐AKT.6, 7, 38 Remarkably, this study did not identify a higher expression of either IGF‐II or IGFR1 in ATs of dogs.

For IGFBP2, higher mRNA expression was detected in adenomas and carcinomas of dogs. The IGFBPs function as regulatory components of IGF signaling,39 and some studies have indicated that high IGFBP2 expression may contribute to ACC pathogenesis. In murine Y1 AT cells, long‐term increased IGFBP2 expression enhanced the malignant phenotype40 and in IGF‐II‐overexpressing ACC of humans increased expression of IGFBP2 has been reported.20 However, the significance of high IGFBP2 expression in the absence of IGF‐II overexpression is unknown. Theoretically, high IGFBP2 expression could lead to higher IGF‐II availability and thus increase IGFR1/PI3K signaling. However, the fact that IGFBP2 overexpression also was detected in adenomas in the absence of increased target gene expression does not support a functional role of IGFBP2 overexpression in PI3K activation in dogs.

In contrast, IGFBP5 showed an overall lower expression in ATs, but a 6.8‐fold higher expression in those carcinomas showing recurrence within 2.5 years after adrenalectomy. In different types of cancer in humans, IGFBP5 overexpression has been noted as a prognostic marker. In particular, in breast cancer, high IGFBP5 expression is associated with a shorter recurrence‐free, metastasis‐free and overall survival and IGFBP5 overexpression in breast cancer cell lines conferred resistance to IGFR1 inhibition.41 Our results therefore indicate the mRNA expression of IGFBP5 as a relevant prognostic factor in ACC in dogs.

An alternative mechanism for receptor tyrosine kinase‐induced PI3K pathway activation is EGFR signaling. In this respect, the tendency toward higher ERBB2 mRNA expression in ACC of dogs is interesting. ERBB2 (also known as HER2) is a receptor tyrosine kinase that lacks a ligand‐binding domain, and functions by heterodimerization with the other EGF receptors. Aberrant ERBB2 activation, for instance because of receptor overexpression, results in activation of the PI3K pathway, growth stimulation and tumorigenesis in different tumor types, of which ERBB2‐positive breast cancer is the most prominent example.11, 42 Different drugs targeting ERBB2 have been approved for clinical use in cancer treatment, including antibodies that inhibit heterodimerization (trastuzumab and pertuzumab43, 44) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors that affect both EGFR (ie, ERBB1) and ERBB2 activity (lapatinib and afatinib45, 46). Recent studies suggest that simultaneously targeting EGFR and ERBB2 further increases antitumor activity.11 Based on the higher expression of ERBB2, this receptor might be a promising new therapeutic target in dogs with ACC, either singly or in combination with EGFR inhibition.

Aside from therapeutic targets, we also aimed to investigate the pathway components for potential new prognostic markers. In this regard, aside from IGFBP5, SGK1, ID1 and ID2 also are worth mentioning. The relative mRNA expression of SGK1 was significantly lower in carcinomas. At first glance, this seems surprising, because SGK1 is activated by PI3K signaling only at the protein level, by phosphorylation.33 Recently, however, SGK1 microdeletions and low SGK1 mRNA expression have been reported in cortisol‐secreting ATs of humans, but not in nonsecreting or aldosterone‐secreting ATs.47, 48, 49 Low SGK1 protein expression was found to be an independent prognostic factor for shorter overall survival.48 Although this study did not identify significant differences in SGK1 mRNA expression between dogs with and without recurrent disease, low SGK1 expression in cortisol‐secreting carcinomas does suggest a functional role for SGK1. Additional studies involving SGK1 protein expression and overall survival analyses are needed to determine whether SGK1 expression might prove to be a prognostic marker in these tumors.

In the group of dogs with recurrent disease, we did find an increase in both ID1 and ID2 expression. This observation is in accordance with studies reporting an association between high ID1 and ID2 expression and poor prognosis in several different tumor types in humans.50 Inhibitor of differentiation proteins are thought to keep cells in a poorly differentiated, proliferative state, and therefore a role for ID1 and 2 in the pathogenesis of malignant ATs in dogs appears likely. Based on our results, ID1 and 2 show promise as new prognostic markers for ACC in dogs. Future studies are needed to determine whether targeting IDs might also be feasible as a new therapeutic option.51, 52

In conclusion, our results suggest the presence of PI3K activation in cortisol‐secreting ACC in dogs, but not in adenomas. In contrast to 1 of the most prominent features of ACC in humans, no significant alterations in IGF‐II or IGFR1 expression were detected. Therefore, our results suggest that inhibition of IGF signaling is not likely to prove successful in dogs with ATs. However, we did find higher expression of ERBB2, providing a preclinical rationale for studying the potential of ERBB2 inhibition, as used in ERBB2‐positive breast cancer, in dogs with ACC. Finally, the lower expression of SGK1 in carcinomas and the higher expression of IGFBP5, ID1, and ID2 in ATs with early recurrence may represent an important step in the search for prognostic markers for cortisol‐secreting ACC in dogs.

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by a Morris Animal Foundation – Pfizer Animal Health veterinary fellowship for advanced study (grant ID: D09CA‐913). The authors thank Dr. S. Klarenbeek for performing the histopathological evaluation of all ATs.

Conflict of Interest Declaration: The authors disclose no conflict of interest.

Off‐label Antimicrobial Declaration: The authors declare no off‐label use of antimicrobials.

All research was performed at the Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Yalelaan 108, 3584 CM, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Part of this study was presented as a poster at the 2014 ACVIM conference.

Footnotes

1

Quiagen, Hilden, Germany

2

NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE

3

Bio‐Rad, Hercules, CA

4

Eurogentec, Maastricht, The Netherlands

5

AB Applied biosystems, Carlsbad, CA

6

New England BioLabs Inc., Ipswich, MA

7

Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA

8

Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK

9

IBM, Armonk, NY

References

  • 1. Galac S, Reusch CE, Kooistra HS, Rijnberk A. Adrenals In: Rijnberk A, Kooistra HS, eds. Clinical Endocrinology of Dogs and Cats. Second, revised and extended edition ed. Hannover: Schlütersche; 2010:93–154. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Schwartz P, Kovak JR, Koprowski A, et al. Evaluation of prognostic factors in the surgical treatment of adrenal gland tumors in dogs: 41 Cases (1999–2005). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008;232:77–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. van Sluijs FJ, Sjollema BE, Voorhout G, et al. Results of adrenalectomy in 36 dogs with hyperadrenocorticism caused by adreno‐cortical tumour. Vet Q 1995;17:113–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Barrera JS, Bernard F, Ehrhart EJ, et al. Evaluation of risk factors for outcome associated with adrenal gland tumors with or without invasion of the caudal vena aava and treated via adrenalectomy in dogs: 86 Cases (1993–2009). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2013;242:1715–1721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Martini M, De Santis MC, Braccini L, et al. PI3K/AKT Signaling pathway and cancer: An updated review. Ann Med 2014;46:372–383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Barlaskar FM, Spalding AC, Heaton JH, et al. Preclinical targeting of the type I insulin‐like growth factor receptor in adrenocortical carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009;94:204–212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Fassnacht M, Weismann D, Ebert S, et al. AKT is highly phosphorylated in pheochromocytomas but not in benign adrenocortical tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005;90:4366–4370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kamio T, Shigematsu K, Kawai K, Tsuchiyama H. Immunoreactivity and receptor expression of insulinlike growth factor I and insulin in human adrenal tumors. An immunohistochemical study of 94 cases. Am J Pathol 1991;138:83–91. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Weber MM, Auernhammer CJ, Kiess W, Engelhardt D. Insulin‐like growth factor receptors in normal and tumorous adult human adrenocortical glands. Eur J Endocrinol 1997;136:296–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Almeida MQ, Fragoso MC, Lotfi CF, et al. Expression of insulin‐like growth factor‐II and its receptor in pediatric and adult adrenocortical tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93:3524–3531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Tebbutt N, Pedersen MW, Johns TG. Targeting the ERBB family in cancer: Couples therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2013;13:663–673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Martini M, Ciraolo E, Gulluni F, Hirsch E. Targeting PI3K in cancer: Any good news? Front Oncol 2013;3:108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Hopkins BD, Hodakoski C, Barrows D, et al. PTEN function: The long and the short of it. Trends Biochem Sci 2014;39:183–190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Willems L, Tamburini J, Chapuis N, et al. PI3K and mTOR signaling pathways in cancer: New data on targeted therapies. Curr Oncol Rep 2012;14:129–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. De Martino MC, van Koetsveld PM, Feelders RA, et al. The role of mTOR inhibitors in the inhibition of growth and cortisol secretion in human adrenocortical carcinoma cells. Endocr Relat Cancer 2012;19:351–364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Doghman M, Lalli E. Efficacy of the novel dual PI3‐kinase/mTOR inhibitor NVP‐BEZ235 in a preclinical model of adrenocortical carcinoma. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2012;364:101–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Gicquel C, Raffin‐Sanson ML, Gaston V, et al. Structural and functional abnormalities at 11p15 are associated with the malignant phenotype in sporadic adrenocortical tumors: Study on a series of 82 tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997;82:2559–2565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Schmitt A, Saremaslani P, Schmid S, et al. IGFII and MIB1 immunohistochemistry is helpful for the differentiation of benign from malignant adrenocortical tumours. Histopathology 2006;49:298–307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Giordano TJ, Thomas DG, Kuick R, et al. Distinct transcriptional profiles of adrenocortical tumors uncovered by DNA microarray analysis. Am J Pathol 2003;162:521–531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Boulle N, Logie A, Gicquel C, et al. Increased levels of insulin‐like growth factor II (IGF‐II) and IGF‐binding protein‐2 are associated with malignancy in sporadic adrenocortical tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998;83:1713–1720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Gicquel C, Boulle N, Logie A, et al. Involvement of the IGF system in the pathogenesis of adrenocortical tumors. Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 2001;62:189–192. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Galac S, Kool MM, Naan EC, et al. Expression of the ACTH Receptor, steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, and steroidogenic enzymes in canine cortisol‐secreting adrenocortical tumors. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2010;39:259–267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Labelle P, Kyles AE, Farver TB, De Cock HE. Indicators of malignancy of canine adrenocortical tumors: Histopathology and proliferation index. Vet Pathol 2004;41:490–497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Brinkhof B, Spee B, Rothuizen J, Penning LC. Development and evaluation of canine reference genes for accurate quantification of gene expression. Anal Biochem 2006;356:36–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Schlotter YM, Veenhof EZ, Brinkhof B, et al. A GeNorm algorithm‐based selection of reference genes for quantitative real‐time PCR in skin biopsies of healthy dogs and dogs with atopic dermatitis. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2009;129:115–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real‐time quantitative PCR and the 2(‐Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 2001;25:402–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Perk J, Iavarone A, Benezra R. Id family of helix‐loop‐helix proteins in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2005;5:603–614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Birkenkamp KU, Essafi A, van der Vos KE, et al. FOXO3a induces differentiation of Bcr‐Abl‐transformed cells through transcriptional down‐regulation of Id1. J Biol Chem 2007;282:2211–2220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Belletti B, Prisco M, Morrione A, et al. Regulation of Id2 gene expression by the insulin‐like growth factor I receptor requires signaling by phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase. J Biol Chem 2001;276:13867–13874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Lau MT, Leung PC. The PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway mediates insulin‐like growth factor 1‐induced E‐cadherin down‐regulation and cell proliferation in ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Lett 2012;326:191–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Lam EW, Francis RE, Petkovic M. FOXO transcription factors: Key regulators of cell fate. Biochem Soc Trans 2006;34:722–726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Allen JE, El‐Deiry WS. Regulation of the human TRAIL gene. Cancer Biol Ther 2012;13:1143–1151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Firestone GL, Giampaolo JR, O'Keeffe BA. Stimulus‐dependent regulation of serum and glucocorticoid inducible protein kinase (SGK) transcription, subcellular localization and enzymatic activity. Cell Physiol Biochem 2003;13:1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Dan HC, Sun M, Kaneko S, et al. Akt phosphorylation and stabilization of X‐linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP). J Biol Chem 2004;279:5405–5412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Klein EA, Assoian RK. Transcriptional regulation of the cyclin D1 gene at a glance. J Cell Sci 2008;121:3853–3857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Pereira SS, Morais T, Costa MM, et al. The emerging role of the molecular marker p27 in the differential diagnosis of adrenocortical tumors. Endocr Connect 2013;2:137–145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. de Fraipont F, El Atifi M, Cherradi N, et al. Gene expression profiling of human adrenocortical tumors using complementary deoxyribonucleic acid microarrays identifies several candidate genes as markers of malignancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005;90:1819–1829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Cantini G, Lombardi A, Piscitelli E, et al. Rosiglitazone inhibits adrenocortical cancer cell proliferation by interfering with the IGF‐IR intracellular signaling. PPAR Res 2008;2008:904041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Ribeiro TC, Latronico AC. Insulin‐like growth factor system on adrenocortical tumorigenesis. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2011;351:96–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Hoeflich A, Fettscher O, Lahm H, et al. Overexpression of insulin‐like growth factor‐binding protein‐2 results in increased tumorigenic potential in Y‐1 adrenocortical tumor cells. Cancer Res 2000;60:834–838. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Becker MA, Hou X, Harrington SC, et al. IGFBP ratio confers resistance to IGF targeting and correlates with increased invasion and poor outcome in breast tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2012;18:1808–1817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Hynes NE, MacDonald G. ErbB receptors and signaling pathways in cancer. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2009;21:177–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Hudis CA. Trastuzumab—Mechanism of action and use in clinical practice. N Engl J Med 2007;357:39–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Barthelemy P, Leblanc J, Goldbarg V, et al. Pertuzumab: Development beyond breast cancer. Anticancer Res 2014;34:1483–1491. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Reid A, Vidal L, Shaw H, de Bono J. Dual inhibition of ErbB1 (EGFR/HER1) and ErbB2 (HER2/neu). Eur J Cancer 2007;43:481–489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Spicer JF, Rudman SM. EGFR inhibitors in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): The emerging role of the dual irreversible EGFR/HER2 inhibitor BIBW 2992. Target Oncol 2010;5:245–255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Ronchi CL, Leich E, Sbiera S, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphism microarray analysis in cortisol‐secreting adrenocortical adenomas identifies new candidate genes and pathways. Neoplasia 2012;14:206–218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Ronchi CL, Sbiera S, Leich E, et al. Low SGK1 expression in human adrenocortical tumors is associated with ACTH‐independent glucocorticoid secretion and poor prognosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:E2251–2260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Ronchi CL, Sbiera S, Leich E, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphism array profiling of adrenocortical tumors—Evidence for an adenoma carcinoma sequence? PLoS One 2013;8:e73959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Nair R, Teo WS, Mittal V, Swarbrick A. ID proteins regulate diverse aspects of cancer progression and provide novel therapeutic opportunities. Mol Ther 2014;000:000–000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Sumida T, Murase R, Onishi‐Ishikawa A, et al. Targeting Id1 reduces proliferation and invasion in aggressive human salivary gland cancer cells. BMC Cancer 2013;13:141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Fong S, Debs RJ, Desprez PY. Id genes and proteins as promising targets in cancer therapy. Trends Mol Med 2004;10:387–392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES