Abstract
Background
Few studies report the minimum inhibitory concentrations for antimicrobials against equine Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates.
Hypothesis/Objectives
To evaluate trends in the in vitro activities of 20 antimicrobials against equine Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates from 1996 to 2012 and to determine if a relationship exists between the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and location of the abscess.
Animals
Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates from 196 horses with naturally occurring disease.
Methods
Retrospective and cross‐sectional design. Medical records were reviewed to obtain clinical and MIC data. Minimum inhibitory concentrations were determined by the microdilution technique. The MIC results over 3 periods were compared (1996–2001, 2002–2006, 2007–2012).
Results
The MIC90 values for clinically relevant antimicrobials were as follows: chloramphenicol ≤4 μg/mL, enrofloxacin ≤0.25 μg/mL, gentamicin ≤1 μg/mL, penicillin =0.25 μg/mL, rifampin ≤1 μg/mL, tetracycline ≤2 μg/mL, trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole (TMS) ≤0.5 μg/mL, ceftiofur =2 μg/mL, and doxycycline ≤2 μg/mL. There were no significant changes in MIC results over the study period. There was no relationship between MIC patterns and abscess location.
Conclusions and Clinical Importance
The MIC 50 and MIC 90 values of antimicrobials evaluated in this study for equine isolates of C. pseudotuberculosis did not vary over time. Abscess location was not associated with different MIC patterns in cultured isolates. Several commonly used antimicrobials are active in vitro against C. pseudotuberculosis in vitro.
Keywords: Antibiotics, Horse, Infection, Susceptibility
Abbreviations
- BHI
brain heart infusion
- BMH
blood Mueller‐Hinton
- MIC
minimum inhibitory concentrations
- TMS
trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole
- VMTH
Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital
Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis is a gram‐positive pleomorphic intracellular bacterium that causes external abscesses, internal abscesses, and ulcerative lymphangitis in horses. Two genetically distinct biovars exist, biovar equi affects horses and is nitrate positive, whereas biovar ovis affects sheep and goats and is nitrate negative.1 The most common sites of external infection in horses are the ventral abdomen and pectoral region, consequently the disease is often termed “pigeon fever.” Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis has been implicated in internal or systemic disease conditions including pneumonia, pleuritis, pericarditis, purpura hemorrhagica, abortion, and panniculitis.2, 3, 4 Although antimicrobial treatment of external abscesses remains controversial, successful treatment of horses with compromised immune function, recurrent external abscesses, internal abscesses, ulcerative lymphangitis, and other systemic forms of the disease requires early diagnosis and treatment with a long course of antimicrobials (typically 30 days or longer).5 Aleman et al reported a 40.5% mortality rate for horses with internal abscesses.6 In that study, all horses with an internal abscess not treated with antimicrobials did not survive. More recently, a mortality rate of 30% was reported in horses treated for internal C. pseudotuberculosis infection.5 In both reports, antimicrobials were considered crucial to a successful outcome.
Selection of appropriate antimicrobial treatment for bacterial infections depends on a number of factors including the microorganism involved, location of infection, and the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antimicrobials.7 Few large reports exist in the literature regarding the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of equine C. pseudotuberculosis isolates.
A previous study evaluated the susceptibility of clinical isolates of C. pseudotuberculosis from a number of species, including cattle, sheep, goats, and horses. In that study, the most active antimicrobials were penicillins, macrolides, tetracyclines, cephalosporins, chloramphenicol, and rifampin.8 Over the years, increasing antimicrobial resistance has been documented in other gram‐positive, closely related bacteria affecting horses, notably Rhodoccocus equi.9, 10 In the human literature, emerging antimicrobial resistance, including multidrug resistance, has been documented among other Corynebacterium species.11 No data are available regarding long‐term temporal patterns in antimicrobial susceptibility of C. pseudotuberculosis isolates.
The aims of this study were to evaluate temporal trends in the MIC patterns of 20 antimicrobials against equine isolates of C. pseudotuberculosis obtained from 1996 to 2012, and to determine if a relationship exists between antimicrobial MIC90 and abscess location (whether external or internal). The hypothesis of this study was that the MIC values of C. pseudotuberculosis isolates to antimicrobials that are used in the treatment of so‐called pigeon fever have increased over time.
Materials and Methods
Isolate Sources
A total of 207 bacterial isolates from 196 horses were available for inclusion in this study. All samples were collected from naturally infected horses and were submitted to the UC Davis William R. Pritchard Veterinary Medical Teaching hospital (VMTH) microbiology laboratory for culture and identification by standard methods. Susceptibility testing of C. pseudotuberculosis isolates submitted to the microbiology laboratory was not routinely performed before 2005. Isolates obtained from necropsy samples also had not been tested. Isolates collected before 2005 and those samples collected at necropsy therefore required prospective susceptibility testing. Minimum inhibitory concentration data were already available for 146 isolates, thus requiring MIC determinations on 61/207 isolates.
MIC Determination
A broth microdilution method was used to assess MICs according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines with few exceptions.12, 13 Sixty‐one isolates without pre‐existing MIC data were obtained from a bacterial bank, where they had been stored at −80°C, using the Microbank system1 until analysis. The beads were recovered under aseptic conditions and used to inoculate a 5% sheep blood agar plate.2 Inoculated sheep blood agar plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours and then inspected for purity and colony morphology.
Once isolates were confirmed to be pure culture, 10‐mL brain heart infusion (BHI) broth with 0.2% Tween 803 was inoculated with a 10‐μL loop (Fisherbrand Flexible loop4 ) from the blood agar plate and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. The supernatant was used to inoculate a second 10‐mL tube containing BHI‐Tween, which was incubated under the same previously described conditions. An aliquot of the BHI broth was used to inoculate 0.85% sodium chloride to a 0.5 McFarland turbidity standard as determined by nephelometer. A 10‐μL aliquot of saline was used to inoculate cation‐adjusted Mueller‐Hinton Broth with lysed horse blood (BMH) (Cation‐adjusted Blood Mueller‐Hinton Broth4), and 100 μL of broth was used to inoculate each well of an Equine Sensititre tray4 (a 96‐well plate containing various antimicrobial concentrations) by an automated technique (SensititreAutoInoculator).4 The plates were sealed with a nonperforated adhesive seal and placed in a non‐CO2 incubator at 35°C for 48 hours, after which time, the MIC was determined for the available antimicrobials with a SensititreSensiTouch plate reader.4 Plates were read at 48 hours because of the slow growth typical of C. pseudotuberculosis.
The antimicrobials and the concentrations tested (μg/mL) were those on the Equine Sensititre tray. Antimicrobials and range of concentrations tested included: amikacin (4–32 μg/mL), ampicillin (0.25–32 μg/mL), azithromycin (0.25–4 μg/mL), cefazolin (4–16 μg/mL), cefotaxime (0.5–64 μg/mL), ceftiofur (0.25–4 μg/mL), ceftizoxime (0.5–64 μg/mL), chloramphenicol (4–32 μg/mL), clarithromycin (1–8 μg/mL), doxycycline (2–16 μg/mL), enrofloxacin (0.25–2 μg/mL), erythromycin (0.25–8 μg/mL), gentamicin (1–8 μg/mL), imipenem (1–8 μg/mL), oxacillin (0.25–4 μg/mL), penicillin (0.06–8 μg/mL), rifampin (0.12–4 μg/mL), tetracycline (2–8 μg/mL), ticarcillin (8–64 μg/mL), and TMS; 0.25/4.75–4/76 μg/mL for trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, respectively. The MIC was defined as the minimum concentration of the antimicrobial that resulted in no bacterial growth. The MIC50 and MIC90 were defined as the concentration at which 50% and 90% of the isolates were inhibited, respectively. Weekly quality control was performed using strains Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, E. coli ATCC 25922, E. coli ATCC 35218, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853.
Isolates with Pre‐existing MIC Data
Minimum inhibitory concentration data were available for 146 isolates. The MIC data were determined using the aforementioned broth microdilution technique, performed at the UC Davis Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital Microbiology Laboratory. Over the study period, different customized Sensititre trays4 have been used by the VMTH microbiology laboratory. Therefore, the types of antimicrobials as well as their dilutions were not standard throughout the study period. As an example, the Trek Equine Sensititre tray4 used for prospective MIC determinations has different minimal dilutions for amikacin, cefazolin, chloramphenicol, doxycycline, gentamicin, and rifampin. The minimum dilutions used for MIC interpretation were those present on the commercially available Equine Sensititre tray4 described above, unless otherwise indicated.
Trends in MIC50 and MIC90
The study period included samples submitted between 1996 and 2012. Because of variable numbers of isolates per year, the study period was divided into 3 time periods to assess trends in MIC data: 1996–2001, 2002–2006, and 2007–2012. For all antimicrobials, the concentrations at which 50 or 90% of isolates were inhibited (MIC50 and MIC90, respectively), were determined over the 3 time periods. The antimicrobials that were considered for evaluation in the final analysis included amikacin, ampicillin, azithromycin, cefazolin, cefotaxime, ceftiofur, ceftizoxime, chloramphenicol, clarithromycin, doxycycline, enrofloxacin, erythromycin, gentamicin, imipenem, oxacillin, penicillin, rifampin, tetracycline, ticarcillin, and TMS. For descriptions other than temporal changes, the overall MIC50 and MIC90 for the entire study period were used (ie, the MIC50 and MIC90 of all 207 isolates).
Clinical Data
When available in the medical records, clinical data collected included breed, age, sex, abscess location (internal versus external infection or ulcerative lymphangitis), days of antimicrobial treatment before presentation, antimicrobials used for treatment, and whether the animal survived, died, or was euthanized because of the disease or was euthanized or died for reasons unrelated to clinical C. pseudotuberculosis infection. Of the 196 horses, 166 belonged to clients of the UC Davis VMTH. The remaining 30 consisted of cases submitted by practitioners from California (12/30), Colorado (12/30), and Utah (6/30).
Statistical Analysis
Trends in MIC50 and MIC90 were analyzed using an exact Cochran‐Armitage test for each antimicrobial. Fisher's exact test for independent binomial proportions was used to determine the relationship between changes in MICs and abscess location (internal versus external). P < .05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Clinical Data
Breeds represented included Quarter Horses (49), Arabians (30), Thoroughbreds (21), American Paint Horses (21), Warmbloods (13), mixed breeds (7), draft breeds (6), Appaloosas (5), Peruvian Pasos (3), Mustangs (2), Standardbreds (2), Friesians (1), Andalusians (1), Morgans (1), Norwegian Fjords (1), and Saddlebreds (1). There also were 2 donkeys. The breed was not recorded for 30 horses. Of the 196 horses, 83 (45%) were female, 77 (39%) were geldings, 10 (5%) were stallions, and the sex was not recorded for 26 (13%). The ages of horses ranged from 0.3 to 32 years, with a mean of 9 years and median of 7 years.
One hundred and seventy‐two horses (87.7%) had external abscesses, which included those horses with concurrent internal infection. One hundred and forty (71.4%) horses had only external abscesses. Of those cases with external abscesses, 62/172 had a single abscess, 19/172 had 2 abscesses, 13/172 had 3, and 47/172 had ≥4 abscesses. The number of external abscesses was not recorded for 31 horses. External abscess locations included the pectoral region, ventral abdomen, inguinal region, sheath, mammary gland, ventral abdomen, triceps, neck, face, gluteal, axilla, tuber coxae, and submandibular regions.
Fifty‐two horses (26.5%) had internal abscesses, 32 had concurrent external abscesses, and 20 horses had internal abscesses only. Four horses (2%) were diagnosed with ulcerative lymphangitis. Location of internal infection included liver (n = 15), lungs (n = 15), kidney (n = 10), spleen (n = 3), and colonic mesentery (n = 1). Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis also was cultured from a joint (n = 1), inner ear (n = 1), and peritoneal fluid (n = 6).
Of the 196 horses in the study, only 42 (21.4%) were not treated with antimicrobials compared to 125 (63.7%) that were treated with antimicrobials at some time point in the course of their disease. Antimicrobial history was unknown for 29 horses (14.7%). The majority of horses were not treated before presentation to the VMTH (127/196). Thirty‐nine horses had been treated with antimicrobials before presentation (median duration of treatment, 6 days). Administered antimicrobials included TMS, oxytetracycline, doxycycline, penicillin, gentamicin, amikacin, metronidazole, ceftiofur, rifampin, chloramphenicol, enrofloxacin, and erythromycin. Many of these drugs were used in combination. The median number of antimicrobials administered per horse was 2 (range, 1–6).
One hundred and sixty‐two horses had outcome recorded. Of these, 134 (82.7%) survived, 12 horses were euthanized and 1 died because of disease attributable to C. pseudotuberculosis. An additional 15 horses died or were euthanized because of unrelated causes, whereas the outcome was unknown for 34 horses. With these 15 horses excluded, the survival rate was 91.2 %. Of the 13 horses with nonsurvival attributable to Corynebacterium infection, all had confirmed or suspected internal abscesses.
Trends in Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations
There were 32 isolates from 1996 to 2001, 83 from 2002 to 2006, and 92 from 2007 to 2012. Twenty six of the 32 isolates from 1996 to 2001, 30/83 from 2002 to 2006, and 5/92 from 2007 to 2012 had to be prospectively tested. The MIC for cefotaxime was not determined for the 1996–2001 period because of a paucity of data.
There were no significant changes in the MIC50 and MIC90 values over time. The MIC90 results determined using data from entire study period (ie, all isolates obtained from 1996 to 2012) are presented in Table 1.
Table 1.
Cumulative MIC90 data for equine Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates obtained from horses
| Antimicrobial | n | Cumulative MIC90 Data (1996–2012) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIC50 (μg/mL) | MIC90 (μg/mL) | Range (μg/mL) | ||
| Amikacin | 207 | 4 | 8 | ≤0.25–32 |
| Ampicillin | 204 | ≤0.25 | 0.5 | ≤0.25–16 |
| Azithromycin | 120 | ≤0.25 | ≤0.25 | ≤0.25–1 |
| Cefazolin | 202 | ≤2 | ≤4 | ≤2–8 |
| Cefotaxime | 57 | 1 | 1 | ≤0.5–4 |
| Ceftiofur | 205 | 2 | 2 | ≤0.25–4 |
| Ceftizoxime | 81 | 1 | 2 | ≤0.5–4 |
| Chloramphenicol | 203 | 2 | ≤4 | ≤0.25–4 |
| Clarithromycin | 65 | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤0.25–1 |
| Doxycycline | 124 | ≤2 | ≤2 | ≤0.12–2 |
| Enrofloxacin | 182 | ≤0.25 | ≤0.25 | ≤0.06–4 |
| Erythromycin | 146 | ≤0.12 | ≤0.25 | ≤0.12–2 |
| Gentamicin | 206 | 1 | 2 | ≤0.25–8 |
| Imipenem | 122 | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤0.12–1 |
| Oxacillin | 38 | 2 | 4 | ≤0.12–4 |
| Penicillin | 178 | 0.25 | 0.25 | ≤0.06–4 |
| Rifampin | 203 | ≤0.12 | ≤1 | ≤0.12–1 |
| Tetracycline | 148 | 0.5 | 2 | ≤0.25–2 |
| Ticarcillin | 66 | ≤8 | ≤8 | ≤8 |
| TMS | 203 | ≤0.25 | 0.5 | ≤0.25–4 |
TMS, trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole.
MIC50 and MIC90 Trends and Abscess Location
No significant relationships were detected between MIC patterns and abscess location.
Discussion
To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first large study of the MICs of antimicrobial agents of equine C. pseudotuberculosis isolates and temporal changes in MIC90 (μg/mL) values. Currently, there are no specific Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) or European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints published for C. pseudotuberculosis, which prevents the classification of isolates as susceptible or resistant. The CLSI guidelines vary, even among the same genus of bacteria, thus extrapolating susceptibility patterns across bacterial species is not possible. For example, the CLSI susceptibility breakpoint for penicillin is ≤0.12 μg/mL for beta‐hemolytic streptococci (excluding S. pneumoniae), ≤0.06 μg/mL for S. pneumoniae, and ≤1 μg/mL for isolates of Corynebacterium sp from humans.12, 13 As a result, the MIC90 data, combined with data from published pharmacokinetic studies in horses, can be used to guide treatment of C. pseudotuberculosis infections in horses.
Macrolides, including erythromycin and clarithromycin, as well as the closely related azolides (azithromycin) are highly lipophilic and conducive for use in the treatment of abscesses. Plasma concentrations above the MIC determined in this study are achievable in horses, making these drugs attractive for the treatment of Corynebacterium abscesses or lymphangitis.14 The risk of severe colitis in adult horses, however, precludes the common use of macrolides in equine practice.15
Ceftiofur is labeled for use in horses and is commonly used in equine practice. The MIC90 was found to be 2 μg/mL. This MIC suggests that ceftiofur would be a poor choice for treatment of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis in horses, because plasma concentrations of 2 μg/mL would be unachievable for >50% of the dosing interval in adult horses using the labeled and commonly used dosage of 2.2 mg/kg IM q24h for ceftiofur sodium (Naxcel5 ) or 6.6 mg/kg for ceftiofur crystalline free acid (Excede5). The use of ceftiofur should be dictated by MIC testing of specific isolates.
Previously published studies suggested that C. pseudotuberculosis isolates were highly susceptible to beta lactam antimicrobials such as ampicillin in vitro.8, 16 IV administered ampicillin could have potential value in treating C. pseudotuberculosis infections in hospitalized horses, but abscess penetrability should be considered because ampicillin has low lipid solubility. Penicillin administered IM at a dosage of 22,000 IU/kg produces plasma concentrations of 0.86 μg/mL for 24 hours.17 The MIC90 for penicillin in our study was 0.25 μg/mL, indicating that attainable plasma penicillin concentrations are above the MIC for C. pseudotuberculosis for adequate duration. A potential disadvantage of penicillin is its lack of lipid solubility in the presence of well‐encapsulated abscesses typical of C. pseudotuberculosis infections.
The tetracycline class of drugs is attractive for the treatment of this disease because of their lipid solubility. Based on the pharmacokinetics of PO administered doxycycline in horses, the recommended MIC targets have included 0.25 μg/mL because plasma concentrations in horses after PO administration rarely exceed 0.48 ± 0.11 μg/mL.18 The drug should not be administered IV because it is associated with fatal dysrhythmias in horses. The MIC90 of doxycycline in our study was ≤2 μg/mL for all isolates combined, because 2 μg/mL was the lowest dilution on the trays used in the prospective component of the study. However, during the period 2007–2012, the trays used included a concentration as low as 0.25 μg/mL for doxycycline. When this concentration is considered, the MIC90 of doxycycline was ≤0.25 μg/mL for 56/58 (96.5%) of isolates tested with these trays (Table 1). Therefore, doxycycline may have potential value for use in treating this disease.
Fluoroquinolones also are lipophilic and conducive to PO administration in horses.19, 20, 21 Although the MIC90 for enrofloxacin was 0.25 μg/mL (lower than achievable plasma concentrations in horses after PO administration), 2/92 (2.2%) of isolates had MIC >0.5 μg/mL. Being a concentration‐dependent antimicrobial, the targeted MIC of the offending microbe should be 8‐ to 10‐fold lower than achievable peak plasma concentrations in horses. Minimum inhibitory concentrations values >0.5 μg/mL would not be conducive to this result. Another measure of potential for efficacy of the fluoroquinolones is the area under the curve: MIC (AUC:MIC) ratio. Using reported AUCs of 21.03 and 16.3 mg h/L for IV and intragastric enrofloxacin administration in horses, respectively, and the MICs obtained in this study, the calculated AUC:MIC ratios for enrofloxacin against C. pseudotuberculosis are 65.2–84.1.20 These are within the suggested targets (45–95) used for fluoroquinolones in human patients and are consistent with an expectation for efficacy.22 This observation also highlights the need for MIC testing of C. pseudotuberculosis isolates, because individual strains may have MIC above achievable plasma concentrations of enrofloxacin in horses.19, 20, 21
Potentiated sulfonamides are widely used PO antimicrobials in horses. Similar to enrofloxacin, the MIC90 of TMS was below achievable plasma concentrations in horses (0.5/9.5 μg/mL).23, 24 However, 2 of the 92 isolates (2.2%) had MIC of 4/76 μg/mL, again highlighting the need for MIC testing when treating individual patients.The reduced or slower activity of TMS in the presence of pus should be considered in cases with walled‐off abscesses.
Aminoglycosides are concentration‐dependent antimicrobials. The MIC90 for gentamicin was approximately 10‐fold lower than achievable peak plasma concentrations reported in horses.25, 26 The range of MIC for gentamicin in our study was 0.25–8 μg/mL, with those isolates having MIC ≤ 2 μg/mL having potentially achievable peaks. However, aminoglycosides have decreased activity in vivo to closely related microbes such as Rhodococcus equi.10 In addition, aminoglycoside uptake is decreased in anaerobic or acidic environments, and aminoglycosides may be inactivated by purulent material, 2 conditions that exist in the environment of C. pseudotuberculosis abscesses.27 Finally, aminoglycosides are hydrophilic, making them poor candidates to penetrate abscess capsules. All of these factors suggest that aminoglycosides may not be a first line choice in the treatment of horses with C. pseudotuberculosis infections. The MIC90 of amikacin was 8 μg/mL. Peak plasma concentrations of 64–80 μg/mL (8 to 10‐fold the MIC) would be difficult to achieve using commonly used dosage in horses.28
Chloramphenicol is highly lipophilic. Because of the relatively poor oral bioavailability after repeat administration, the high frequency of administration required, and risk of aplastic anemia in humans handling the drug, the use of chloramphenicol for treatment of C. pseudotuberculosis infection in horses may be less desirable than other antimicrobials.29 Because of the variable absorption of chloramphenicol in horses and the MIC values determined in this study, chloramphenicol is not ideal for treatment of most infections of C. pseudotuberculosis in horses; use in individual cases should be dictated by MIC results.30
Rifampin is commonly used in the treatment of C. pseudotuberculosis infections in horses, because of its high lipophilicity and intracellular penetration.5, 6 The MIC results of this study would support its use.31 However, because of concerns over acquired resistance, it likely should be administered with another effective and compatible antimicrobial.32
The classification of the abscess as internal or external did not correlate with differences in MIC90 results over time. When combining isolates from all time periods, there were no significant differences between MICs of C. pseudotuberculosis isolates cultured from external versus internal abscesses.
Limitations of this study were largely a result of the retrospective and cross‐over design of the study. The antimicrobials and their respective dilutions on the commercially available microtiter Sensititre tray used by the microbiology laboratory at the VMTH have changed over the study periods. This resulted in a paucity of data for some antimicrobials because the specific antimicrobials as well as the dilutions included on the trays varied over the years. This may have resulted in statistically significant differences being missed when the data were evaluated for temporal changes in MIC because some of the trays used relatively high antimicrobial concentrations. For example, the standard trays used 2 μg/mL as the lowest dilution for doxycycline, but because of relatively low oral bioavailability in horses, 0.25 μg/mL would be a more appropriate dilution to use, and was used in the more recent trays. Despite these different lowest dilutions used for some of the antibiotics across time, no statistically significant differences were detected in MIC results over the 3 time periods. The MIC results obtained from records and those obtained prospectively were within 1 dilution of one another for all of the studied antimicrobials, with the exception of rifampin and doxycycline for which the lowest concentration available on the specific trays used differed widely. Another limitation was that the MIC data were based on only 1 selected colony, rather than multiple colonies. Variations in antimicrobial susceptibility may be present in bacteria of the same species isolated from 1 source.33 Another potential limitation of the study is that the MICs were determined at 48 hours because corynebacteria are slow‐growing microbes.11, 34 However, 48 hours has been used for MIC determination of other corynebacteria.11
No CLSI or EUCAST clinical breakpoints or consensus guidelines exist for C. pseudotuberculosis isolates. Therefore, it was not possible to classify isolates as susceptible or resistant. Instead, we utilized published knowledge of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the tested antimicrobials, such as oral bioavailability and lipophilicity, to hypothesize whether the determined MIC would be conducive to the use of these drugs in the treatment C. pseudotuberculosis infection in horses.
In conclusion, this study suggests that many commonly used antimicrobials in equine practice are effective against C. pseudotuberculosis isolates in vitro and that changes in MIC were not identified over the study period. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolates as well as oral bioavailability of antimicrobials should be considered in horses when interpreting potential for clinical efficacy. Currently, MIC testing of C. pseudotuberculosis isolates is not routinely performed by all commercial microbiology laboratories. Based on the results of this study, MIC testing of cultured isolates should be strongly recommended.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge Dr Eline Britz for providing patient clinical data and Dr Russ Sakai for data entry. This study was supported by the Center for Equine Health, University of California, Davis, with funds from the Oak Tree Racing Association, the State of California pari‐mutuel wagering fund and contributions from private donors.
Conflict of Interest Declaration: The authors disclose no conflict of interest.
Off‐label Antimicrobial Declaration: The authors declare no off‐label use of antimicrobials.
This study was conducted at the University of California, Davis Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, Davis, CA 95616.
This work was presented as a research abstract at the 2014 AAEP Conference, Salt Lake City, UT.
Footnotes
Microbank system, Pro‐Lab Diagnostics, Round Rock, TX
Blood agar plate, 5% sheep blood in tryptic soy agar base, Hardy Diagnostics, Santa Maria, CA
Brain Heart Infusion broth with 0.2% Tween 80, Veterinary Medical Biologic Media Services, Davis, CA
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA
Zoetis, Florham Park, NJ
References
- 1. Costa LR, Spier SJ, Hirsh DC. Comparative molecular characterization of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis of different origin. Vet Microbiol 1998;62:135–143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Poonacha KB, Donahue JM. Abortion in a mare associated with Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis infection. J Vet Diagn Invest 1995;7:563–564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Perkins SL, Magdesian KG, Thomas WP, Spier SJ. Pericarditis and pleuritis caused by Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis in a horse. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004;224:1133–1138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Farstvedt EG, Hendrickson DA, Dickenson CE, Spier SJ. Treatment of suppurative facial cellulitis and panniculitis caused by Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis in two horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004;224:1139–1142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Pratt SM, Spier SJ, Carroll SP, et al. Evaluation of clinical characteristics, diagnostic test results, and outcome in horses with internal infection caused by Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis: 30 cases (1995–2003). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005;227:441–448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Aleman M, Spier SJ, Wilson WD, Doherr M. Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis infection in horses: 538 cases (1982–1993). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996;209:804–809. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Papich MG. Current concepts in antimicrobial therapy for horses. Proc Ann Conv AAEP 2001;47:94–102. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Judson R, Songer JG. Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis: In vitro susceptibility to 39 antimicrobial agents. Vet Microbiol 1991;27:145–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Burton AJ, Giguere S, Sturgill TL, et al. Macrolide‐ and rifampin‐resistant Rhodococcus equi on a horse breeding farm, Kentucky, USA. Emerg Infect Dis 2013;19:282–285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Carlson KL, Kuskie KR, Chaffin KM, et al. Antimicrobial activity of tulathromycin and 14 other antimicrobials against virulent Rhodococcus equi in vitro. Vet Ther 2010;11:E1–E9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hinic V, Lang C, Weisser M, et al. Corynebacterium tuberculostearicum: A potentially misidentified and multiresistant Corynebacterium species isolated from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 2012;50:2561–2567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute . Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals; approved standard‐3rd edition. CLSI Document M31‐A3; 2008;28:65–72. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute . Methods for antimicrobial dilution and disk susceptibility testing of infrequently isolated or fastidious bacteria; approved guideline‐2nd edition. CLSI Document M45‐A2 2010; 30:18–19. [Google Scholar]
- 14. Giguere S, Lee E, Williams E, et al. Determination of the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance to macrolide antimicrobials or rifampin in Rhodococcus equi isolates and treatment outcome in foals infected with antimicrobial‐resistant isolates of R equi . J Am Vet Med Assoc 2010;237:74–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Gustafsson A, Baverud V, Gunnarsson A, et al. The association of erythromycin ethylsuccinate with acute colitis in horses in Sweden. Equine Vet J 1997;29:314–318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Adamson PJ, Wilson WD, Hirsh DC, et al. Susceptibility of equine bacterial isolates to antimicrobial agents. Am J Vet Res 1985;46:447–450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Uboh CE, Soma LR, Luo R, et al. Pharmacokinetics of penicillin G procaine versus penicillin G potassium and procaine hydrochloride in horses. Am J Vet Res 2000;61:811–815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Winther L, Honore Hansen S, Baptiste KE, Friis C. Antimicrobial disposition in pulmonary epithelial lining fluid of horses, part II. Doxycycline. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2011;34:285–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Papich MG, Davis JL. Antimicrobial therapy In: Sellon D, Long M, eds. Equine Infectious Diseases. St. Louis, MO: Sauders; 2007:578–591. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Haines GR, Brown MP, Gronwall RR, Merritt KA. Serum concentrations and pharmacokinetics of enrofloxacin after intravenous and intragastric administration to mares. Can J Vet Res 2000;64:171–177. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Epstein K, Cohen ND, Boothe DM, et al. Pharmacokinetics, stability, and retrospective a nalysis of use of an oral gel formulation of the bovine injectable enrofloxacin in horses. Vet Ther 2004;5:155–167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Ohki E, Yamagishi Y, Mikamo H. Relationship between the clinical efficacy and AUC/MIC of intravenous ciprofloxacin in Japanese patients with intraabdominal infections. J Infect Chemother 2013;19:951–955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Brown MP, Gronwall R, Castrol L. Pharmacokinetics and body fluid and endometrial concentrations of trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole in mares. Am J Vet Res 1988;49:918–922. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Gustafsson A, Baverud V, Franklin A, et al. Repeated administration of trimethoprim/sulfadiazine in the horse‐pharmacokinetics, plasma protein binding and influence on intestinal microflora. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1999;22:20–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. van der Harst MR, Bull S, Laffont CM, Klein WR. Influence of fluid therapy on gentamicin pharmacokinetics in colic horses. Vet Res Commun 2005;29:141–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Magdesian KG, Hogan PM, Cohen ND, et al. Pharmacokinetics of a high dose gentamicin administered intravenously or intramuscularly to horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1998;213:1007–1011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Dowling PM. Aminoglycosides In: Giguere S, Prescott J, Baggot J, Walker D, Dowling P, eds. Antimicrobial Therapy in Veterinary Medicine. Ames, IA: Blackwell; 2006:207–229. [Google Scholar]
- 28. Pinto N, Schumacher J, Taintor J, et al. Pharmacokinetics of amikacin in plasma and selected body fluids of healthy horses after a single intravenous dose. Equine Vet J 2011;43:112–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Gronwall R, Brown MP, Merritt AM, Stone HW. Body fluid concentrations and pharmacokinetics of chloramphenicol given to mares intravenously or by repeated gavage. Am J Vet Res 1986;47:2591–2595. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Cox S, Sommardahl C, McElligott E. Pharmacokinetics of oral chloramphenicol base in adult horses at 50 mg/kg dosage. Abstracts ACVIM Forum, 2014.
- 31. Wilson WD, Spensley MS, Baggot JD, Hietala SK. Pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, and in vitro antibacterial activity of rifampin in the horse. Am J Vet Res 1988;49:2041–2046. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Liu Y, Cul J, Wang R, et al. Selection of rifampicin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus during tuberculosis therapy: Concurrent bacterial eradication and acuisition of resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005;56:1172–1175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Walker R. Antimicrobial susceptiblity testing methods and interpretation of results In: Giguere S, Prescott J, Baggot J, Walker D, Dowling P, eds. Antimicrobial Therapy in Veterinary Medicine. Ames, IA: Blackwell; 2006:11–25. [Google Scholar]
- 34. Muckle CA, Gyles CL. Characterization of strains of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis . Can J Comp Med 1982;46:206–208. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
