Abstract
Cystinosin mediates an ATP-dependent cystine efflux from lysosomes and causes, if mutated, nephropathic cystinosis, a rare inherited lysosomal storage disease. Alternative splicing of the last exon of the cystinosin sequence produces the cystinosin-LKG isoform that is characterized by a different C-terminal region causing changes in the subcellular distribution of the protein. We have constructed RFP-tagged proteins and demonstrated by site-directed mutagenesis that the carboxyl-terminal SSLKG sequence of cystinosin-LKG is an important sorting motif that is required for efficient targeting the protein to the plasma membrane, where it can mediate H+ coupled cystine transport. Deletion of the SSLKG sequence reduced cystinosin-LKG expression in the plasma membrane and cystine transport by approximately 30%, and induced significant accumulation of the protein in the Golgi apparatus and in lysosomes. Cystinosin-LKG, unlike the canonical isoform, also moves to the lysosomes by the indirect pathway, after endocytic retrieval from the plasma membrane, mainly by a clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Nevertheless, silencing of AP-2 triggers the clathrin-independent endocytosis, showing the complex adaptability of cystinosin-LKG trafficking.
Introduction
The carboxyl-terminal portion of proteins often contains key sequences that are essential for accurate protein sorting and signaling [1,2]. Moreover, proteins can undergo reversible or irreversible post-translational modifications, producing additional changes at their terminal sequences that modify their biological properties. Changes in the C-terminal sequence can modify temporal and/or spatial distribution of peptides in cells, which often translates into different biological properties of a given protein, according to the cell compartment in which it is expressed, and to the biological state of the cell [3].
In humans, the CTNS gene encodes for cystinosin (UniProt # O60931-1), a cystine/H+ symporter that mediates the efflux of cystine in the presence of a proton gradient. The protein is predominantly expressed in the lysosomal membrane and is predicted to have seven transmembrane domains [4]. In lysosomes, ATP hydrolysis provides the energy to the V-type ATPase to generate a proton gradient allowing cystine/proton co-transport (molar ratio 1:1) through cystinosin [5]. Mutations in the CTNS gene results in massive accumulation of cystine in lysosomes and causes cystinosis (MIM 21980), a rare multisystemic disorder that represents the first cause of renal Fanconi syndrome in early childhood. Essential to the role of cystinosin in cells, sorting of the protein to lysosomes requires at least two targeting motifs, namely a classical tyrosine-based motif (GYDQL), located at the C-terminal end, and a conformational motif (YFPQA), located in the putative fifth inter-transmembrane loop [6].
In addition to the originally described lysosomal protein, we have identified a second isoform (UniProt # O60931-2), termed cystinosin-LKG, based on the sequence of the last amino acids, that is produced by an alternative splicing of exon 12, and which differs from its canonical counterpart only in the carboxyl-terminal sequence (Fig 1). This results in a more scattered expression of the protein in different cell compartments, albeit cystine transport properties do not appear to be modified [7]. Cystinosin-LKG is expressed at high levels in renal tubular epithelia, in the liver, in pancreatic islets of Langerhans, in mucoserous glands of the bronchial epithelia, in melanocytes and in keratinocytes [8]. In the testis, the amount of cystinosin-LKG transcripts matches those of the canonical isoform; cystinosin-LKG is expressed at particularly high levels in Leydig cells [8]. In general, many cells expressing high amounts of cystinosin-LKG have secretory activities, suggesting that this isoform may be important for intracellular trafficking and secretory functions. To date however, these have not been further clarified. A major obstacle is represented by the absence of anti-cystinosin antiserum that specifically recognizes the most abundant isoform that is exclusively expressed in lysosomes. We have been successful in generating a cystinosin-LKG specific antibody, which however is not sensitive enough to analyze the subcellular distribution of the protein.
To overcome these limitations, we have studied the subcellular distribution of RFP-tagged cystinosin-LKG in stably transfected human kidney epithelial cells (HK-2). Our data show that cystinosin-LKG can reach the lysosomal compartment through the constitutive secretory pathway, which directs the protein to the plasma membrane, where it is then retrieved by clathrin-dependent endocytosis and transferred to late endosomes and to lysosomes. Deletion of the SSLKG motif located at the terminal end alters the cell distribution of the protein, indicating that the carboxyl-terminal region plays a pivotal role in cystinosin-LKG sorting.
Material and Methods
Cell Cultures
Human Kidney cell line HK-2 (ATCC # CRL-2190) were growth in DMEM F-12 GlutaMax (Gibco) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (Gibco), 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 10 μg/ml insulin from bovine pancreas, 5.5 μg/ml human transferrin (substantially iron-free), and 5 ng/ml sodium selenite (Sigma–Aldrich), in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 and 37°C.
Plasmid Constructs and Transfection
The full-length CTNS-LKG coding sequence was fused in frame at its carboxyl-terminal region with RFP cDNA and inserted into the expression vectors pcDNA 3.1 (Invitrogen). Alternatively, the full-length cDNA encoding cystinosin-LKG was subcloned into pcDNA6/V5His (Invitrogen) or pEGFP-N1 (Clontech) vectors. S396A, S397A, L398A, K399A, G400A, ΔYFPQA and ΔSSLKG deleted mutants were generated by site-directed mutagenesis with Q5 Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (New England Biolabs). Sequence integrity was tested by direct sequencing. After plasmid purification, cells were transfected in HK-2 cells using Lipofectamine LTX (Invitrogen), following manufacturer’s instructions. Cells stably overexpressing RFP fusion protein were selected with 3 μg/ml hygromycin B.
Quantification of RFP-positive cells by flow cytometry
HK-2 transfected with RFP tagged cystinosin-LKG or ΔSSLKG deleted mutant were washed with PBS and harvested in ice-cold PBS-1% FBS to perform flow cytometry on FACSCanto™II flow cytometer with the CellQuest software (BD Biosciences). Dead cells and debris were excluded by gating on forward/side light scatter, and 10,000 events, corresponding to RFP positive cells were analyzed per sample. The intensity level of fluorescence was determined by calculating the geometric mean of fluorescence intensity.
Immunofluorescence
Stably transfected HK-2 cells expressing RFP-tagged cystinosin-LKG were grown in the 8 wells Chamber Slides (BD Falcon). Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at 4°C, permeabilized with 0.05% Triton X-100 for 5 min at 4°C, blocked with 1% FBS in PBS for 1 h at room temperature, and stained with primary antibody diluted 1:100 for 1 h at 4°C, followed by two 10 min washes with PBS and incubation with FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody for 30 min at 4°C. Lysosomes were stained with anti-LAMP-2 or anti-LAMP-1 mAb (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), endoplasmic reticulum (ER) with anti-PDI mAb (Abcam), Golgi with anti-GM130 mAb (BD Biosciences).
HK-2 transfected with cystinosin-LKG and ΔSSLKG conjugated with RFP or V5His were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at 4°C, permeabilized 30 min at room temperature with 0.05% saponin, 0.05% BSA, 50 mM NH4Cl, blocked with 1% BSA in PBS for 1 h, and stained with anti-RFP (Abcam) or anti-His Tag, clone HIS.H8 (Millipore) diluted 1:200 for 1 h, incubated with FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG antibody respectively, in alternated washing steps with PBS.
Confocal Laser Microscopy
The confocal microscopy imaging was performed on Olympus Fluoview FV1000 confocal microscope equipped with FV10-ASW (version 2.0 software), using the 63X oil objective (numerical aperture 1.4). Optical single sections were acquired with a scanning mode format of 1024x1024 pixels, with a pixel size of 0.21 μm sampling, speed of 40 μs/pixel and 12 bits/pixel images. Acquisition of automated-sequential collection of multi-channel images was performed in order to reduce spectral crosstalk between channels. Lasers' power, beam splitters, filter settings, pinhole diameters (equivalent to 1 Airy unit) and scan mode were the same for all examined samples of each staining. Colocalization analysis was performed using ImageJ software downloaded from http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij (JACoP plugin).
Tables of images were processed using Adobe Photoshop CS6 software (Adobe Systems Inc).
Live cell imaging and photobleaching experiments
Confocal time-lapse microscopy was performed on a Leica TCS-SP8X laser-scanning confocal microscope equipped with a resonant scanner (Leica Microsystems, Mannheim, Germany), a 488 nm Ar laser, and a stage incubator (OkoLab, Naples, Italy) allowing to maintain stable conditions of temperature, CO2 and humidity during live cell imaging. Images were acquired using a HC PLAPO 63X glycerol immersion objective (numerical aperture: 1.30; Leica Microsystems).
For FRAP experiments, 24 hours post-transfection cells were imaged using an LSM710 confocal microscope (Zeiss) fitted with a 488 nm argon and 568 nm ion laser lines, using a 63x PlanApochromat NA 1.4 DIC oil immersion objective. FRAP experiments were performed as following. Briefly, single or multiple region of interest (ROIs) were depicted into the co-expressing cells. Cells were acquired 5 frames before bleaching (4 sec/frame). Bleaching was performed with 100% power of the 488 and 568 lasers for 30 iterations. Recovery was monitored up to 400 seconds after bleaching, using 3% power of the laser. FRAP recovery curves were generated from background subtracted images and the values of fluorescence intensity at each time point were normalized singly to the initial fluorescence as described [9]. Bleaching was minimal during the time course of recovery, between 0–10% and where bleaching exceeded 10%, the recovery sequences were excluded.
For fluorescence loss in photobleaching (FLIP) experiments, a living cell was repeatedly bleached in the same region of interest (ROI) using high laser power and imaging was performed before each new round of bleaching. In particular, cells were imaged before photobleaching with 2% Ar laser power, followed by repeated photobleaching using a single bleach pulse (100% laser power) at intervals of 1 sec for 200 iterations. The loss of fluorescence in a ROI outside of the bleached region was measured over time by LAS AF software.
Total plasma membrane protein purification
HK-2 cells stably transfected with cystinosin-LKG-RFP were treated with Sulfo-NHS-SS-Biotin for 30’ at 4°C using EZ-Link Sulfo NHS-SS Biotinylation Kit (Pierce). Cells were then processed according to the Manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, surface-biotinylated cells were lysed; nuclei and whole cells were discarded. Lysates were then purified on streptavidin affinity columns.
Cystine uptake assay
HK-2 cells stably transfected with cystinosin isoforms or mutant protein were growth in 24-well plates. After washing with Krebs-Henseleit-HEPES buffer (4 mM KCl, 135 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgSO4, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM monobasic NaH2PO4, 5 mM D-glucose, and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4), cells were incubated 20 min at 20°C with 0.1 μCi L-[14C]-cystine in 200 μl of Krebs-Henseleit-HEPES buffer, pH 7.4 or pH 5.6. After washing in ice-cold buffer, cells were lysed with 0.1 N NaOH and counted in a Beckman Coulter liquid scintillation counter (Fullerton, CA).
SDS Gel electrophoresis
Samples were boiled and resolved in 4–12% pre-casted SDS-polyacrylamide gel (Biorad), transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare), blocked in 5% non-fat dry milk/TBS+0.01% Tween (blocking solution) for 1h. Blotting was performed with rabbit polyclonal anti-human RFP (Abcam) or with mouse monoclonal anti-human Integrin subunit β1 (BD Biosciences) or rabbit polyclonal anti-human AP2 mu1 (GeneTex) or mouse monoclonal anti-human β actin (Ambion). Immunoblots were developed with long lasting chemiluminescence substrate (Euroclone) and acquired with the ChemiDoc™ XRS System (Bio-Rad).
Transferrin uptake
Transferrin uptake control assays were performed using Alexa-488 labeled human transferrin (Molecular Probes). HK-2 cells were serum starved for 30 min, kept on ice for 10 min, then incubated with 25 μg/ml Alexa-488 transferrin for 15 min at 4°C for binding, washed, and transferred to 37°C for 15 min. When occurred, the endocytosis inhibitors were added during two last steps.
siRNA Construction and Transfection
Custom siRNA construction was supplied from Thermo Scientific Dharmacon. Labelling of siRNA was performed by using siRNA labelling kit (Ambion Inc.) according to the Manufacturer’s kit. HK-2 cells cultured in 24-well plate were transfected with 200 nM of silencer siRNA oligonucleotides pool directed against human subunit μ1 of AP-2 (AP2M1) or with a scrambled negative control oligonucleotide using Oligofectamine™ Reagent (Invitrogen) as suggested by the supplier. Total RNA was extracted from HK-2 cells by using TRIzol® Reagent (Invitrogen); RT-PCR was performed using First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche). The primer pair of AP2M1 (sense: 5’-ATAAGATGTGTGACGTGATGGC-3’; antisense: 3’-CTACTTCTCGATGGACTCACCG-5’) was specific for a 371-bp fragment of AP2M1 transcripts. The primer pair of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (sense: 5’-CTGCACCACCAACTGCTTAG-3’; antisense: 3’-AGGTCCACCACTGACACGTT-5’) was specific for a 282-bp fragment of GAPDH transcripts. The PCR conditions for AP2M1 consisted of an initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min followed by 35 cycles of 45 s at 94°C, 45 s at 56°C, and 45 s at 72°C with a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The PCR conditions for GAPDH consisted of an initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min followed by 25 cycles of 45 s at 94°C, 45 s at 55°C, and 45 s at 72°C with a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. A 10μl aliquot of the PCR products was electrophoresed on a 1.5% agarose gel following Gelred™ Nucleic Acid Gel Stain (Biotium, Inc.) staining and acquired with ChemiDoc™ XRS System (Bio-Rad).
Statistical Analysis
Data of colocalization (Pearson’s correlation coefficient, Rr) were obtained by selecting ROIs (Region of Interest) from at least 30 cells and analyzed with JACoP plugin [10] of ImageJ software in three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± SE. P values were estimated by non-parametric, unpaired, two-tailed t-test.
Results
Subcellular distribution of the cystinosis-LKG and of cystinosin-LKG mutant
As mentioned above, no isoform-specific antibodies providing accurate subcellular distribution of cystinosin are currently available. To overcome this limitation, we have generated HK-2 cell lines stably transfected with RFP-tagged cystinosin-LKG or RFP-tagged cystinosin-ΔSSLKG that lack the last five amino acid. Immunofluorescence studies (Fig 2A–2C) showed differences in the co-localization and a distribution of RFP-tagged cystinosin-LKG and cystinosin-ΔSSLKG. Pearson’s correlation coefficients (Rr) (Fig 2D), revealed that cystinosin-LKG and cystinosin-ΔSSLKG co-localize more with lysosomal-associated membrane protein 2 (LAMP-2) than with protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) and with the Golgi matrix protein (GM130) (p < 0.0005), indicating higher localization in lysosomes. A moderate but significant increase in lysosomal localization of the ΔSSLKG mutant proteins was observed (RrLKG = 0.56 ± 0.03 vs RrΔSSLKG = 0.71 ± 0.03; p < 0.0005). Co-localization with ER markers was less prominent and no significant changes were observed between wild-type and ΔSSLKG mutants (RrLKG = 0.40 ± 0.03 vs RrΔSSLKG = 0.42 ± 0.02; p = NS). In contrast, expression in the Golgi compartment was low for the wild-type protein, but increased very significantly in the ΔSSLKG mutants (RrLKG = 0.21 ± 0.02 vs RrΔSSLKG = 0.46 ± 0.03; p < 0.00001).
Determination of expression in the plasma membrane of cystinosin-LKG and cystinosin-ΔSSLKG
Changes in the expression of cystinosin-LKG in the plasma membrane were assessed by co-localization experiments using blue wheat germ agglutinin as a membrane marker (Fig 3A). Semi-quantitative analysis by confocal microscopy revealed a significant reduction of the ΔSSLKG mutant protein at the cell surfaces (RrLKG = 0.44 ± 0.04 vs RrΔSSLKG = 0.28 ± 0.02; p < 0.001). This result was confirmed by cell surface biotinylation followed by SDS-PAGE analysis of biotinylated proteins. The plasma membrane expression of cystinosin-LKG was reduced by approximately 30% after deleting the SSLKG sequence. This effect was not related to differences in the levels of expression of proteins, as assessed by flow cytofluorimetry (91.1% RFP positive for cystinosin-LKG vs 99.1% of ΔSSLKG mutant) (Fig 3B). To verify that the fusion of the RFP to the C terminus of cystinosin-LKG and the ΔSSLKG mutant did not interfere with their localization, an additional construct was made by using a V5His tag in frame with the protein sequences. Immunofluorescence studies using the anti-RFP antibody confirmed that the fluorescent signal did indeed correspond to RFP tagged cystinosin-RFP. Immunofluorescence with anti-His Tag on HK-2 transiently transfected with V5His-tagged cystinosin-LKG and ΔSSLKG mutant showed a distribution similar to the RFP-tagged proteins (Fig 3C).
Site-directed mutagenesis was performed to identify critical amino acid residues in the SSLKG motif. Overall, all substitutions limited to one single amino acid of the SSLKG motif did not alter significantly the membrane distribution of the protein; substitution of serine at position 397 with alanine showed some variability in the distribution of cystinosin-LKG, with a moderate decrease in the expression observed in some cells, but this finding was not uniform (S1 Fig).
Culture conditions that stimulate expression of cystinosin-LKG, like serum starvation and medium without methionine and cystine, dramatically increased the expression of the cystinosin-LKG and of the ΔSSLKG mutant in all compartments (S2 Fig). In contrast, the expression of the more abundant lysosomal isoform was limited to lysosomal structures.
14C-Cystine uptake in HK-2 stably transfected with the cystinosin isoforms or ΔSSLKG mutant
In order to verify if differences in the plasma membrane expression of cystinosin-LKG and cystinosin-ΔSSLKG had an impact on cystine uptake from the extracellular milieu radiolabelled L-[14C]-cystine assays were performed. As shown in Fig 4, in the absence of a proton gradient (pH = 7.4), overexpression of cystinosin, cystinosin-LKG and cystinosin-ΔSSLKG had no impact on L-[14C]-cystine uptake. However, in the presence of a proton gradient (pH = 5.6), uptake of radiolabelled L-[14C]-cystine was significantly increased in HK-2 stably transfected with cystinosin-LKG compared to the untransfected cells (p < 0.00005) and stably transfected with RFP-tagged cystinosin (p < 0.0005). The uptake of L-[14C]-cystine in HK-2 cells stably transfected with cystinosin-ΔSSLKG was significantly reduced by approximately 35% (p < 0.004), a results that is compatible with the different degree of expression of these two proteins in the plasma membrane.
Cystinosin-LKG dynamics in living HK-2
Since cystinosin-LKG, differently from the canonical cystinosin, shows a variable subcellular distribution and a peculiar presence in the plasma membrane, we performed confocal live cell imaging, which helps to analyze dynamics of this isoform (S1 Movie). Analysis with TrackMate v. 2.8.2, a plugin of ImageJ, showed the movements of EGFP tagged cystinosin-LKG, embedded into vesicles, towards the plasma membrane and backwards (Fig 5A). Resident and mobile moieties of cystinosin-LKG were assayed by Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP) of HK-2 transfected with RFP tagged cystinosin-LKG and CAAX-GFP used as internal control. Data analysis indicated that 36.1% ± 4.9 SE is mobile (Mf), whereas (63.9% ± 4.9 SE) are resident in the plasma membrane (If). After photobleaching RFP tagged cystinosin-LKG fluorescence in the plasma membrane recovers with a mean half-time of recovery (thalf) = 92.2 ± 12.6 seconds (Fig 5B). To exclude that fluorescence recovery was only due to the contribution of lateral mobility of the cystinosin-LKG, and to assess whether the protein moves from the cytoplasm to the plasma membrane, a complementary approach with Fluorescence Loss in Photobleaching (FLIP) was performed. Repeated bleaching of the same region close to the plasma membrane revealed signal decay of EGFP tagged cystinosin-LKG on the portion of the plasma membrane overlooking the bleach region, demonstrating the anterograde transport of the carrier (Fig 5C).
Inhibition of the clathrin- or caveolin-dependent endocytosis
To characterize the mechanisms regulating the endocytic retrieval of cystinosin-LKG from the plasma membrane, we examined in HK-2 cells the effects of selective inhibitors of the clathrin- or caveolin-dependent endocytosis. HK-2 cells, stably transfected with cystinosin-LKG conjugated with RFP, were serum starved for 48 hours. Cells were then treated for 30 min at 37°C with 5 μg/ml chlorpromazine (CPZ), a cationic amphiphilic drug. This drug inhibits clathrin-coated pit formation by reversible removal of clathrin molecules and of the adapter protein complex from the plasma membrane [11]. Alternatively, cells were treated with 30 μg/ml methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD), which depletes membranes from cholesterol and inhibits clathrin-independent pathways. Significant accumulation of cystinosin-LKG in plasma membrane was observed with CPZ treatment, while no significant changes were observed in cells treated with MβCD (Fig 6A). The efficacy of treatments was supported by measurements of transferrin uptake that was specifically blocked by CPZ and not by MβCD (Fig 6B). Cell surface protein biotinylation and subsequent SDS-PAGE analysis confirmed the microscopy data (Fig 6C). Treatment with inhibitors of endocytosis did not affected significantly the presence of cystinosin-LKG in lysosomes (data not shown).
Silencing of the AP-2 Adaptor Complex
The AP-2 adaptor complex is generally required for the formation and endocytosis of clathrin-coated vesicles. We assessed the role of AP-2 by siRNA interference of the AP-2 mu chain in HK-2 overexpressing RFP-tagged cystinosin-LKG or ΔSSLKG mutant. Transfection efficiency was assessed by PCR showing transcript reduction of about 80% and by western blotting showing protein reduction of about 70% (Fig 7A). Silencing of AP-2 in WGA green stained HK-2 overexpressing cystinosin-LKG significantly reduced the presence of the protein in the plasma membrane compared to the scrambled control (RrMock = 0.43 ± 0.02 vs RrsiAP-2 = 0.31 ± 0.03; p < 0.001) (Fig 7B).
Thirty minutes incubation with MβCD, which inhibits clathrin-independent endocytosis, caused a significant accumulation of cystinosin-LKG in the plasma membrane of cells silenced for AP-2 (RrsiAP-2 = 0.31 ± 0.03 vs RrsiAP-2+MβCD = 0.48 ± 0.03; p < 0.001), as shown in Fig 7B. As expected, cystinosin-ΔSSLKG was less abundantly expressed in the plasma membrane of WGA green-stained HK-2 cells. AP-2 silencing and MβCD treatment did not induce statistically significant changes (RrMock = 0.31 ± 0.03 vs RrsiAP-2 = 0.25 ± 0.03; p = NS, RrsiAP-2+MβCD = 0.31 ± 0.04; p = NS) (Fig 7C). Pearson’s Correlation of different experimental conditions was reported in Fig 7D. The specificity of this result was sustained by the uptake of Alexa-488 transferrin assays, which showed that cells silencing AP2 caused retention of transferrin close to the plasma membrane (Fig 7E).
Silencing of AP-1, which mediates protein sorting from the trans-Golgi network (TGN) to endosomes and backwards, and silencing of AP-3, which plays an important role in the transport of proteins through the endo-lysosomal pathway, had no significant effect on the plasma membrane expression of cystinosin-LKG (RrMock = 0.45 ± 0.02 vs RrsiAP-1 = 0.37 ± 0.04 and RrsiAP-3 = 0.46 ± 0.03; p = NS) (data not shown).
Deletion of the Lysosomal-targeting Signal
Cherqui et al. has shown partial relocalization of cystinosin to the plasma membrane after delating the GYDQL lysosomal targeting motif at the carboxy-terminal end and nearly complete relocalization after additional deletion of the YFPQA motif in the 5th inter-transmembrane loop [6]. To assess if partial localization of the LKG isoform to the lysosome was not mediated by the YFPQA motif, we have generated RFP tagged cystinosin-LKG lacking the YFPQA sequence. As shown in Fig 8, this mutated isoform retain the ability to localized to intracellular vesicles that were stained by LAMP-2, indicating that the SSLKG sequence is per se able to direct the protein to the lysosomal compartment (Fig 8).
Discussion
Most recent studies on nephropathic cystinosis have focused on the role and function of the canonical cystinosin isoform that is exclusively expressed in lysosomes. Cystinosin-LKG maintains cystine transport characteristics and follows transcriptional modulation similar to the lysosomal isoform [7,12]. It differs from cystinosin by its less selective subcellular distribution. The functional relevance of this isoform is yet unknown. It is however, largely demonstrated that alternative splicing represents a general mechanism for modulating protein expression and functions [13]. Soluble lysosomal proteins are sorted to the lysosomes by recognition of cleavable N-terminal signal peptides and mannose-6-phosphate residues. Similarly, lysosomal transmembrane proteins share canonical and non-canonical motifs that are required to direct them to the lysosomal membrane. These signals include dileucine-based motifs (DXXLL or [DE]XXXL[LI]) and tyrosine-based motifs (YXXØ), which both interact with components of clathrin coats, such as GGAs (Golgi localized γ-ear containing ARF-binding proteins) and adaptor protein complexes [14].
Cherqui et al. have shown that the GYDQL motif is essential to direct cystinosin to the lysosome, and that combined mutations of the C-terminal sequence and of the 5th putative transmembrane loop redirect nearly entirely the protein to the plasma membrane [6]. Andrzejewska et al. demonstrated that the GYDQL motif has strong AP-3-binding activity, which mediates direct intracellular targeting of cystinosin to late endosomes/lysosomes [15]. Although cystinosin-LKG lacks the tyrosine-based motifs (GYDQL) at its terminal end, it retains the ability to reach the lysosomes. Furthermore, cystinosin-LKG also localizes to other cytosolic organelles and is expressed in the plasma membrane. Most likely, other non-canonical amino acid sequences are responsible for these differences, as also shown for other lysosomal proteins [16]. Herein, we have shown that the amino acidic sequence of the C-terminal region influences the cell expression.
Using reporter molecules and site-directed mutagenesis we have confirmed that the SSLKG sequence is essential to the subcellular distribution of cystinosin-LKG. This motif however, even if could be recognized as a KKXX-like motif, does not act as a signal to transfer the protein from the Golgi apparatus to the ER, like in other proteins harboring dilysine motifs [17]. In fact, we observed very limited expression of cystinosin-LKG in the ER. Conversely, when the SSLKG domain was deleted, the protein accumulated in the Golgi, suggesting that quality control mechanisms of the protein synthesis apparatus prevented expression of the mutant protein somewhere else in the cell [18]. Expression at the plasma membrane level of this isoform was also significantly affected by the deletion of the SSLKG sequence, indicating that sorting and retrieval from the plasma membrane is a physiological step of the normal routing of cystinosin-LKG. The presence of an RFP tag did not influence the relative expression of cystinosin-LKG and ΔSSLKG mutant on the plasma membrane.
It has been well established that lysosomal targeting of lysosomal membrane proteins (LMPs) can follow a direct pathway that transfers newly synthesized proteins from the trans-Golgi network (TGN) directly to the endosomal system [19], or an indirect pathway. In the latter case, proteins are transferred from the TGN to the plasma membrane and subsequently delivered to lysosomes via the endocytic pathway [20]. FRAP and FLIP experiments, and more striking live cell imaging of EGFP tagged cystinosin-LKG, show that this isoform moves directionally through the cytoplasm to the plasma membrane and backward. FRAP analysis, moreover, showed that the plasma membrane-associated cystinosin-LKG has a relatively high immobile fraction (63.9 ± 4.9%), that might be due to protein clustering, interactions with scaffolding or cytoskeleton proteins, and/or protein-lipid interactions. Hypothetically, cystinosin-LKG in the plasma membrane could mediate cystine uptake from the extracellular milieu in conditions where cells lack cystine. This would however, require a proton gradient. Heavy expression in the plasma membrane of cystinosin-LKG in cells that are cultured in cystine-free medium supports this item.
This condition, which recalls to the mechanism of proton/substrate coupling fully explained in Ruivo et al. for canonical cystinosin [21], is particularly interesting as physiological aspect; in fact, cystinosin-LKG, in particular conditions, could implements the cystine/glutamate antiporter system x-c activity, which is pH sensitive and inhibited by acidic environment [22].
A limited number of lysosomal transport proteins have been well characterized to date [23]. The processing of other integral lysosomal membrane proteins, such as the lysosomal acid phosphatase Battenin (encoded by the gene CLN3, which causes neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses when mutated) or the mucolipin subfamily of transient receptor potential proteins (TRPMLs, mucolipidosis-associated) is in many aspects similar to cystinosin-LKG, involving passage through the plasma membrane [24–26]. Each protein pathway and the requirements for specific adaptor protein (AP) complexes can differ wildly among lysosomal membrane proteins. In general however, when protein are translocated via the direct pathway AP-1 and/or AP-3 complexes are required, whereas trafficking through the indirect pathway is usually mediated by AP-2 complexes.
Accumulation of cystinosin-LKG in the plasma membrane after inhibition of endocytosis, in particular after inhibition of the clathrin-mediated pathway, without significant changes of the expression in lysosomes, indicates that this isoform reaches lysosomes, at least in part, through the indirect pathway. The observation that cystinosin-LKG can reach lysosomes even in absence of the second unconventional targeting signal located in the fifth inter-TM loop (ΔFPQA mutant) indicates that lysosomal targeting of the LKG isoform is not affected by this motif like the canonical cystinosin.
Surprisingly, silencing of AP-2 did not increases the expression of cystinosin-LKG in the plasma membrane, although the internalization of transferrin (Tf), a widely used marker of clathrin-mediated endocytosis, was highly impaired in these cells. This suggests that, even if AP-2 is essential for the endocytic retrieval mediated by clathrin coated-pit and for the formation of coated-vesicles, the cell can up-regulate alternative endocytic structures to potentiate its trafficking pathways from the plasma membrane [27]. We speculate that a similar mechanism could apply to cystinosin-LKG. Consistent with this hypothesis, combined blockade of the clathrin-dependent pathway with siAP-2 and of the clathrin-independent pathway with MβCD produced accumulation of cystinosin-LKG in the plasma membrane. Whereas, several non-canonical roles for AP2 have begun to emerge. A recent study shows, in fact, that the glutamate receptor GLR-1, similarly to cystinosin-LKG, does not accumulate at the plasma membrane in AP-2 mutants [28].
Overall, our results indicate that cystinosin-LKG is transferred at least in part to the plasma membrane by the secretory pathway, and is subsequently directed to lysosomes after internalization and trafficking through the endosomal system. The SSLKG motif is essential to regulate this process. Post-translational modifications such as cleavage and/or phosphorylation could be critical for modulating protein sorting. Studies are underway and indicate that this process is complex.
At this stage, it is yet unknown if the -LKG isoform has a specific function in secretory vesicles, endosomes and in the plasma membrane, or if detection of the protein in these organelles is simply related to its intracellular trafficking characteristics. More generally, this isoform has been well preserved throughout evolution [7]. It is unknown if it represents a vestigial residue or if it has specific functions in cells that are different from the purely lysosomal isoform. This is particularly relevant since gene therapies could be attempted based on encouraging results obtained in mouse models of bone marrow transplantation in cystinosis [29]. Moreover, increasing evidence shows that cells can transfer material between them; predictably, the lysosomal isoform could be transferred from a wild-type cell to a cystinotic cell through exosomal secretion, while cystinosin-LKG can also be transferred through shedding of microvesicles from the plasma membrane [30,31].
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants of Cystinosis Research Network (Lake Forest, IL, USA) and Cystinosis Research Foundation (Irvine, CA, USA)
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by grants of Cystinosis Research Network (Lake Forest, IL, USA) and Cystinosis Research Foundation (Irvine, CA, USA). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Nakamura M, Yasuda D, Hirota N, Yamamoto T, Yamaguchi S, Shimizu T, et al. Amino acid residues of G-protein-coupled receptors critical for endoplasmic reticulum export and trafficking. Methods Enzymol. 2013;521: 203–216. 10.1016/B978-0-12-391862-8.00011-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Seatter MJ, Drummond R, Kanke T, Macfarlane SR, Hollenberg MD, Plevin R. The role of the C-terminal tail in protease-activated receptor-2-mediated Ca2+ signalling, proline-rich tyrosine kinase-2 activation, and mitogen-activated protein kinase activity. Cell Signal. 2004;16: 21–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chung JJ, Shikano S, Hanyu Y, Li M. Functional diversity of protein C-termini: more than zipcoding? Trends Cell Biol. 2002;12: 146–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Town M, Jean G, Cherqui S, Attard M, Forestier L, Whitmore SA, et al. A novel gene encoding an integral membrane protein is mutated in nephropathic cystinosis. Nat Genet. 1998;18: 319–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kalatzis V, Cherqui S, Antignac C, Gasnier B. Cystinosin, the protein defective in cystinosis, is a H(+)-driven lysosomal cystine transporter. EMBO J. 2001;20: 5940–5949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cherqui S, Kalatzis V, Trugnan G, Antignac C. The targeting of cystinosin to the lysosomal membrane requires a tyrosine-based signal and a novel sorting motif. J Biol Chem. 2001;276: 13314–13321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Taranta A, Petrini S, Palma A, Mannucci L, Wilmer MJ, De Luca V, et al. Identification and subcellular localization of a new cystinosin isoform. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008;294: F1101–8. 10.1152/ajprenal.00413.2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Taranta A, Petrini S, Citti A, Boldrini R, Corallini S, Bellomo F, et al. Distribution of cystinosin-LKG in human tissues. Histochem Cell Biol. 2012;138: 351–363. 10.1007/s00418-012-0958-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Phair RD, Misteli T. High mobility of proteins in the mammalian cell nucleus. Nature. 2000;404: 604–609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bolte S, Cordelieres FP. A guided tour into subcellular colocalization analysis in light microscopy. J Microsc. 2006;224: 213–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang LH, Rothberg KG, Anderson RG. Mis-assembly of clathrin lattices on endosomes reveals a regulatory switch for coated pit formation. J Cell Biol. 1993;123: 1107–1117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bellomo F, Corallini S, Pastore A, Palma A, Laurenzi C, Emma F, et al. Modulation of CTNS gene expression by intracellular thiols. Free Radic Biol Med. 2010;48: 865–872. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.01.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yura K, Shionyu M, Hagino K, Hijikata A, Hirashima Y, Nakahara T, et al. Alternative splicing in human transcriptome: functional and structural influence on proteins. Gene. 2006;380: 63–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Braulke T, Bonifacino JS. Sorting of lysosomal proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1793: 605–614. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.10.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Andrzejewska Z, Nevo N, Thomas L, Bailleux A, Chauvet V, Benmerah A, et al. Lysosomal Targeting of Cystinosin Requires AP-3. Traffic. 2015;16: 712–726. 10.1111/tra.12277 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kyttala A, Ihrke G, Vesa J, Schell MJ, Luzio JP. Two motifs target Batten disease protein CLN3 to lysosomes in transfected nonneuronal and neuronal cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15: 1313–1323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Letourneur F, Gaynor EC, Hennecke S, Demolliere C, Duden R, Emr SD, et al. Coatomer is essential for retrieval of dilysine-tagged proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum. Cell. 1994;79: 1199–1207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Appenzeller-Herzog C, Hauri HP. The ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC): in search of its identity and function. J Cell Sci. 2006;119: 2173–2183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pols MS, van Meel E, Oorschot V, ten Brink C, Fukuda M, Swetha MG, et al. hVps41 and VAMP7 function in direct TGN to late endosome transport of lysosomal membrane proteins. Nat Commun. 2013;4: 1361 10.1038/ncomms2360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Janvier K, Bonifacino JS. Role of the endocytic machinery in the sorting of lysosome-associated membrane proteins. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16: 4231–4242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ruivo R, Bellenchi GC, Chen X, Zifarelli G, Sagne C, Debacker C, et al. Mechanism of proton/substrate coupling in the heptahelical lysosomal transporter cystinosin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109: E210–7. 10.1073/pnas.1115581109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bannai S, Kitamura E. Role of proton dissociation in the transport of cystine and glutamate in human diploid fibroblasts in culture. J Biol Chem. 1981;256: 5770–5772. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Schwake M, Schroder B, Saftig P. Lysosomal membrane proteins and their central role in physiology. Traffic. 2013;14: 739–748. 10.1111/tra.12056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Braun M, Waheed A, von Figura K. Lysosomal acid phosphatase is transported to lysosomes via the cell surface. EMBO J. 1989;8: 3633–3640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mao Q, Xia H, Davidson BL. Intracellular trafficking of CLN3, the protein underlying the childhood neurodegenerative disease, Batten disease. FEBS Lett. 2003;555: 351–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cheng X, Shen D, Samie M, Xu H. Mucolipins: Intracellular TRPML1-3 channels. FEBS Lett. 2010;584: 2013–2021. 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.12.056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Boucrot E, Saffarian S, Zhang R, Kirchhausen T. Roles of AP-2 in clathrin-mediated endocytosis. PLoS One. 2010;5: e10597 10.1371/journal.pone.0010597 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Garafalo SD, Luth ES, Moss BJ, Monteiro MI, Malkin E, Juo P. The AP2 clathrin adaptor protein complex regulates the abundance of GLR-1 glutamate receptors in the ventral nerve cord of Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Biol Cell. 2015;26: 1887–1900. 10.1091/mbc.E14-06-1048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Syres K, Harrison F, Tadlock M, Jester JV, Simpson J, Roy S, et al. Successful treatment of the murine model of cystinosis using bone marrow cell transplantation. Blood. 2009;114: 2542–2552. 10.1182/blood-2009-03-213934 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Iglesias DM, El-Kares R, Taranta A, Bellomo F, Emma F, Besouw M, et al. Stem cell microvesicles transfer cystinosin to human cystinotic cells and reduce cystine accumulation in vitro. PLoS One. 2012;7: e42840 10.1371/journal.pone.0042840 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yeagy BA, Harrison F, Gubler MC, Koziol JA, Salomon DR, Cherqui S. Kidney preservation by bone marrow cell transplantation in hereditary nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2011;79: 1198–1206. 10.1038/ki.2010.537 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Omasits U, Ahrens CH, Muller S, Wollscheid B. Protter: interactive protein feature visualization and integration with experimental proteomic data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30: 884–886. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt607 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.