Abstract
The embryonic myosin isoform is expressed during fetal development and rapidly down-regulated after birth. Freeman-Sheldon syndrome (FSS) is a disease associated with missense mutations in the motor domain of this myosin. It is the most severe form of distal arthrogryposis, leading to overcontraction of the hands, feet, and orofacial muscles and other joints of the body. Availability of human embryonic muscle tissue has been a limiting factor in investigating the properties of this isoform and its mutations. Using a recombinant expression system, we have studied homogeneous samples of human motors for the WT and three of the most common FSS mutants: R672H, R672C, and T178I. Our data suggest that the WT embryonic myosin motor is similar in contractile speed to the slow type I/β cardiac based on the rate constant for ADP release and ADP affinity for actin-myosin. All three FSS mutations show dramatic changes in kinetic properties, most notably the slowing of the apparent ATP hydrolysis step (reduced 5–9-fold), leading to a longer lived detached state and a slowed Vmax of the ATPase (2–35-fold), indicating a slower cycling time. These mutations therefore seriously disrupt myosin function.
Keywords: ATPase, enzyme kinetics, molecular motor, recombinant protein expression, skeletal muscle, human myosin, muscle disease, myosin subfragment 1, transient kinetics
Introduction
Autosomal dominant mutations in 5 of the 10 human sarcomeric myosin heavy chain (MyHC)4 genes cause a wide variety of cardiac and skeletal myopathies (1), and new mutations continue to be discovered (2–5). There are two developmental myosin isoforms: MyHC-perinatal (MYH8) and MyHC-embryonic (MYH3), both of which are expressed primarily during fetal development and during muscle regeneration (6).
There have been few studies of developing muscle in humans; however, the order in which myosin isoforms are expressed has been described. Primary skeletal muscle fibers appear after 8 weeks of gestation, followed at 10 weeks by the appearance of secondary fibers, which become the predominant form by week 21 (7). Primary fibers express MyHC-emb and the cardiac or slow muscle isoform, MyHC-β (8, 9), with the MyHC-emb being detected before MyHC-β (10). Secondary fibers initially only express MyHC-emb, followed by MyHC-peri (10). At week 15, MyHC-emb accounts for about 81% of all human MyHC transcripts (11), whereas a population of tertiary fibers emerges at week 16 that expresses adult fast myosin (9, 12). Adult myosins and tertiary fibers gradually increase toward the end of gestation (9, 10) as both MyHC-emb and MyHC-peri are down-regulated, with MyHC-emb and MyHC-peri only being faintly detectable in a few fibers in 1-month-old infants. However, recently, MyHC-emb protein has been detected outside of this time window (13).
Mutations in MyHC-emb cause autosomal dominant distal arthrogryposis, the most severe form of which is Freeman-Sheldon syndrome (FSS) (11). Phenotypes include club foot, camptodactyly (contractures of the fingers or toes), contractures of oral facial muscles leading to a “whistling face” phenotype, and, in the most severe cases, scoliosis (14). There are currently eight identified MyHC mutations that cause FSS (14–16). 90% of FSS cases are linked to three mutations in the motor domain of MyHC-emb: R672C, R672H, and T178I (14). Patients who have the T178I mutation have the most severe phenotypes (facial contractures and congenital scoliosis), R672H results in intermediate severity, and R672C is the least severe (14). Adult muscle fibers from individuals with wild type MyHC-emb and those with the R672C mutation do not differ in expression levels of MyHC-emb protein (13). Tajsharghi et al. (15) presented data from an FSS patient with a T178M mutation in MYH3. At 15 months, the individual had a higher level of MyHC-peri expression (>20% of all fibers) compared with that of eight “healthy” control samples (0–2% of all fibers) taken at a similar time of development (10–15 months). Samples taken from the same patient at 5 years showed a predominance of type-1/MyHC-β expression with small, scattered type-1 fibers. This suggests that there could be a compensatory effect or a developmental defect that causes MyHC-peri to be expressed later or longer in postnatal development. Tajsharghi et al. (15) hypothesized that the myopathy occurs during embryonic development and that after birth, when MyHC-emb is down-regulated, there is a recovery of the muscle leaving some residual muscle defects. Functional studies on muscle fibers from healthy and FSS individuals with the R672C mutation showed that the mutant fibers had reduced force, prolonged relaxation time, and incomplete relaxation (13).
Embryonic myosin heavy chain is the most abundant during development, when muscles are being formed (6). Because distal muscles are more affected in FSS, it is interesting to note that distal muscles appear to be formed earlier during development than proximal muscles (17). They may therefore express embryonic myosin for a longer period of time than proximal muscles.
To understand the pathogenesis of FSS, it is necessary to understand the nature of the defect in the mutant myosin motor proteins and how it might be corrected. Both residues involved, Thr178 and Arg672, are highly conserved in all myosin II molecules and located near the ATP binding site close to the P-loop, where the γ-phosphate of ATP binds (Fig. 1). Examination of homologous myosin motor domain structures (subfragment 1 or S1; Fig. 1A) shows that Thr178 is at the end of the fourth strand of the central seven-stranded β-sheet and close to the ATP binding site at the base of the P-loop (Fig. 1B) in a location that can influence ATP binding and hydrolysis. Arg672 is located on the third β-strand with the side chain buried, which interacts with the relay helix, SH1-SH2 domain, and the β-strands on either side, regions that go through major conformational changes during the myosin cross-bridge cycle (18, 19). Notably, the crystal structures show an interaction between Arg672 and Thr178 that may account for the similar phenotypes in the mutants.
Due to the difficulty of isolating homogeneous myosin samples from human muscle and the limited ability to obtain samples from FSS patients, we utilized an established recombinant expression approach (20). This approach was first used by Wang et al. (21), and we have used it to study the kinetics of all human adult skeletal and cardiac isoforms and two mutations in the human cardiac MyHC-β associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (22–24). These studies have demonstrated that this is a powerful technique for studying homogeneous, human, wild type, and mutant myosin S1 samples using both biochemical kinetics and in vitro motility approaches. We used this recombinant approach to study pure human WT MyHC-emb and the three FSS-causing mutants. Although some results have been reported on embryonic and R672C mutant muscle fibers (11, 13), to our knowledge, this is the first detailed functional study of purified WT MyHC-emb and any of the mutations that cause FSS.
Materials and Methods
Proteins
Human embryonic MyHC-S1 proteins were expressed and purified as described previously (20). We constructed shuttle plasmids containing the S1 coding region for MYH3 (Met1–Ser843) upstream of a His6 tag. Using the pAdEasy kit, these plasmids were used to construct recombinant replication-deficient adenovirus that express MYH3. We first cloned the WT MYH3 gene and then performed site-directed mutagenesis to produce the R672C, R672H, and T178I mutations. The viral particles were amplified using HEK293 cells, the cell lysates were clarified using cesium chloride gradients, and the concentrated virus was stored in a glycerol buffer at −20 °C.
Some alterations were made to the published expression system. For cell culture, we used the four-layer NuncTM Cell Factory system to increase culturing capacity. As described previously (20) for expressing S1 in this system, C2C12 cells need to be differentiated from myoblasts to myotubes. The definition of multiplicity of infection does not apply with a syncytial multinuclear cellular structure combined with a larger culturing surface area, which results in an indeterminate cell count. To overcome this and standardize our infection, we used an A260 measurement at a 1:100 dilution and a conversion factor of 1 A260 = 1.1 × 1012 viral particles/ml (25, 26). For example, for an A260 of 0.1, we would infect a 100-mm dish with 10 μl of concentrated virus. When extrapolating to a four-layer cell factory, we took into account the surface areas of a 100-mm dish and a four-layer cell factory.
Infected C2C12 cells were incubated for 5 days and frozen into a cell pellet. This was then homogenized in a low salt buffer and centrifuged, and the supernatants were purified by two procedures. For stopped flow, we used nickel affinity chromatography (HisTrap HP 1-ml column). Afterward, the S1 was dialyzed into the low salt stopped-flow buffer (25 mm KCl, 20 mm MOPS, 5 mm MgCl2, 1 mm DTT, pH 7.0, Fig. 2). From between 1500 and 3000 cm3 of cultured C2C12 cells, we isolated 1–2 mg of purified MyHC with a concentration between 10 and 20 μm. A small amount of endogenous myosin persisted in the S1 sample purified for stopped flow. Using densitometry software (Scion Image) to analyze SDS-polyacrylamide gels, we calculated the contaminate myosin as <5% of the S1 by mass, or a 1:40 molar ratio of myosin/S1. It is possible that the myosin and S1 were bound to actin and so were co-purified.
For ATPase measurements, the purification scheme was modified and extended. Nickel affinity chromatography was performed by gravity in a Bio-Rad Econo-Pac column packed with HisPur nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid resin. Eluates were dialyzed in a low salt/low imidazole buffer. The eluted material was subjected to anionic exchange chromatography (HiTrap HP 1-ml column) and desalted by another buffer exchange into the ATPase assay buffer (see the ATPase method). This gave a higher purity of S1 necessary for ATPase assays.
As reported previously (20), the recombinant S1 co-purifies with the endogenous mouse light chains (Fig. 2). Essential light chains MLC1A and MLC1F and regulatory light chain MLC2F appear to purify with the recombinant S1 because their bands are much denser than the essential light chain MLC3F and in the correct ratio to the heavy chain. They are the same light chains that have been found to associate with embryonic myosin in tissue (25). The percentage identity between the human and mouse light chains is 90–95%. Rabbit skeletal actin was prepared as described previously (27) and labeled with pyrene at Cys374 (28).
ATPase
For steady-state ATPase measurements, we modified the NADH-coupled assay as described (29). This assay system couples the ADP production to NADH oxidation to NAD+; therefore, absorbance was read at 340 nm. We used a 96-well format, and the assay buffer used in all experiments was 12 mm PIPES, 2 mm MgCl2, and 1 mm DTT at pH 6.8 and 25 °C. Bovine cardiac actin was purified as described previously (27) and used for ATPase measurements. Once thoroughly and rapidly mixed, the assays were read for 30 min in a Molecular Devices SpectraMax reader to monitor absorbance over time. The Michaelis-Menten equation was fit to the data to determine the maximal activity (Vmax) and the associated actin constant for myosin (Km) using GraphPad Prism.
Transient Kinetics
All kinetic experiments were conducted in 20 mm MOPS buffer with 25 mm KCl, 5 mm MgCl2, and 1 mm DTT, pH 7, at 20 °C, unless otherwise indicated. Measurements were performed with a High-Tech Scientific SF-61 DX2 stopped-flow system. The concentrations stated are those after mixing in the stopped-flow observation cell unless otherwise stated. All stopped-flow traces were analyzed in either software provided by TgK Scientific (Kinetic Studios) or Origin (Microcal). Intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence was measured by excitation at 295 nm and observed through a WG320 filter. In the absence of actin, the kinetics of S1 and ATP or ADP were interpreted using the seven-step model described by Bagshaw et al. (30) (Scheme 1), where the forward rate constants are k+i and the reverse rate constants are denoted k−i. Ki = k+i/k−i representing the equilibrium constant at the ith step in the reaction.
In the ADP displacement from S1 assays, the two amplitudes are proportional to the concentration of S1 present as either free S1 or S1-ADP. ADP concentrations determine the amplitudes as follows.
When actin was present, the sample was excited at 365 nm, and emission of pyrene-labeled actin was detected after being passed through a KV399 cut-off filter. The binding of S1 to pyrene-labeled actin quenches the fluorescence; therefore, dissociation could be measured by an increase in fluorescence. The interactions between actin-S1 and ATP or ADP were analyzed based on the model in Scheme 2 (22).
Following a reversible binding of ATP to actomyosin, there is a rate-limiting isomerization (k′+2) of the complex, leading to rapid actomyosin dissociation. ADP and ATP compete for the nucleotide binding site on the S1, and ADP binding is governed by the dissociation constant K′5 (= k′+5/k′−5).
A dissociation reaction can be measured when the pyrene-labeled actin is in a complex with S1 because the complex quenches the pyrene signal. ATP induces the dissociation of S1 from actin, resulting in an increase in fluorescence, allowing the reaction kinetics to be determined. Using Scheme 2, Equation 3 can be used to determine the constants K′1k′+2, k′+2, and 1/K′1.
Equation 4 defines the kinetics when ATP and ADP are in rapid competition for binding to the actomyosin complex, and K′1 [ATP] < 1, such that the equation is linear with respect to [ATP].
If, in the absence of ADP, kobs = k0, then normalizing Equation 4 can make different myosin isoform comparisons easier.
ADP release (k′+5) was determined by the kobs when the saturating ADP was incubated with actin-S1 and rapidly mixed with high concentrations of ATP.
To determine the actin affinity, an S1 titration assay was performed as described by Kurzawa and Geeves (31). Fixing the concentration of pyrene-labeled actin, the amplitude of the ATP-induced dissociating reaction provides an estimate of the fraction of actin bound to S1 at increasing S1 concentrations. The amplitude dependence of the S1 concentration was fitted to the physically significant root of the following quadratic equation.
In all cases, the data in the figures refer to individual experimental measurements, whereas Table 1 gives mean values of the fitted constant for a minimum of three separate measurements using different protein preparations.
TABLE 1.
* KCl concentration 0 mm.
a Nag et al. (24) in same ionic strength as this experiment obtained from C2C12 cells.
b p < 0.05 determined by Student's t test as compared with wild type embryonic S1.
c p < 0.01 determined by Student's t test as compared with wild type embryonic S1.
d p < 0.001 determined by Student's t test as compared with wild type embryonic S1.
Sequence Alignments and Homology Modeling
Three-dimensional homology models were generated (Fig. 1) for the human embryonic isoform using the SWISS-MODEL automatic comparative protein modeling server (32–35). The primary sequence for the embryonic myosin was aligned pairwise with the sequence of the six scallop structures (PDB codes given below) using the Clustal Omega alignment protocol. These alignments were submitted to SWISS-MODEL, which generated the models. The sequence identity between the human embryonic S1 sequence and the scallop myosin was 60%, which allowed us to build well resolved structures. The scallop structures were used because they represent different conformational states of the cross-bridge cycle: post-rigor-like structure with ADP bound (PDB code 2OTG), a rigor-like structure without nucleotide bound (PDB code 2OS8), a post-rigor structure without a nucleotide bound (PDB code 1SR6), a pre-power stroke state containing ADP-VO4 (PDB code 1QVI), the actin-detached state containing ADP-BeFx (PDB code 1KK8), and a near rigor state with ADP bound (PDB code 1S5G). We compared the interactions we found in the homology to the two MyHC-β structures (4P7H and 4DB1, sequence identity 79%) to validate their existence in human myosin structures as well as the original scallop structures.
Results
Nucleotide Binding to Actin-S1 and Actin Binding to S1
The detachment of the actin-myosin cross-bridge is the step that is thought to limit shortening velocity in contracting muscle fibers. This can be limited by either the rate of ATP binding to the cross-bridge or the preceding ADP release step (Scheme 2). Because these are the first reports of detailed kinetics of wild type (WT) MyHC-emb, we will compare its properties to another slow myosin, the well characterized MyHC-β. For slow type myosins, the affinity of ADP for actin-S1 is normally tighter than the fast type myosins (IIa, IIb, IIx, α), and ADP release limits the detachment and the overall muscle shortening velocity (36–38). Therefore, we examined these steps first.
ATP-induced Detachment from Actin Is Slower for Myosin S1 Carrying FSS Mutations
The ATP-induced dissociation of S1 from actin was monitored by the fluorescence of a pyrene label covalently attached to Cys374 of actin (Fig. 3A). At low concentrations of ATP, WT MyHC-emb, R672C, and T178I transients are best described by a single exponential fit. At all ATP concentrations, there is a second slower phase for R672H, which is best described by a double exponential fit. At high ATP concentrations ([ATP] > 100 μm), T178I develops a slow second phase, similar to the slow component in R672H. A slow component was not seen for the WT MyHC-emb or the R672C at any concentration of ATP used. At low ATP concentrations, there is a linear relationship between kobs and ATP concentration for all constructs (Fig. 3B), which gives a second order rate constant of actin dissociation (K′1k′+2; Table 1). Compared with β-cardiac myosin S1, the WT MyHC-emb shows faster ATP-induced dissociation kinetics, whereas for the FSS mutants, this process is slower (Table 1 and see Fig. 9).
The Maximum Rate of ATP-induced Dissociation Is Significantly Altered by the FSS Mutations
Over a wide range of ATP concentrations, the relationship between kobs and ATP concentration is best described by a hyperbola (Fig. 3B), which gives a maximum rate constant of dissociation (k′+2) and the affinity of ATP binding in the initial step, 1/K1. There is a second slow component found at all ATP concentrations for R672H and at the higher ATP concentration (>100 μm) for T178I. One cause of a slow component could be ADP contamination; therefore, S1 was incubated with apyrase to hydrolyze any ADP. However, this has no effect on the slow component for either the R672H or T178I. This led us to the hypothesis that the slow component is caused by a conformational change in the ATP binding pocket from a closed to open state (the equilibrium constant for this conformational change, Kα; see Scheme 2) previously seen in MyHC-β (39). Values for Kα, calculated from the ratios of the fluorescent amplitudes for both components, and the maximum rate constant (k+α) are summarized (Table 1).
ADP Affinity (K′5) for WT MyHC-emb Motor Domain and the Three Mutations Is Typical of a Slow Myosin
To determine ADP affinity in the presence of actin, a competition assay was used (Fig. 4A). The observed rate constant (kobs) reduces as ADP increases and exhibits a hyperbolic dependence on ADP concentration defining the ADP affinity, K′5 (Fig. 4B). A similar measurement for T178I results in a value of K′5 that is not significantly different from that for WT MyHC-emb. The ADP affinity for WT MyHC-emb is about 2-fold weaker than the WT β-myosin S1. The FSS mutation T178I does not alter ADP affinity compared with WT MyHC-emb.
The hyperbolic dependence of kobs on ADP concentration, found for WT MyHC-emb and T178I, is consistent with the rate constant of ADP release being of the same order or faster than the rate constant for ATP binding (K1k+2[ATP]) under these conditions. This was confirmed by measuring the rate of ADP displacement directly by incubating the S1 with a much higher ADP concentration and displacing with several high ATP concentrations (millimolar) (39). The trace can be best described by a single exponential signifying ADP release from S1 and ATP binding. The kobs is unaffected by [ATP] and therefore remains constant. The ADP release rate constant is not significantly different from WT MyHC-emb. The ADP release rates for WT MyHC-emb are significantly slower compared with cardiac β-myosin (Table 1). The ADP release rate constant for WT MyHC-emb was significantly slower than cardiac β-myosin.
This type of hyperbolic dependence on ADP concentration is not found for the other two mutations (R672H and R672C), which shows a biphasic transient (Fig. 4C shows R672H as an example). This is consistent with the rate constant for ADP release (k′+5) being slower than the rate constant for ATP binding (R672H). Whereas the k′+5 of R672C is similar to that of the WT, the k′+2 is much slower, leading to the biphasic nature. The fast phase results from ATP binding to the fraction of actin-S1, which is free of ADP, whereas the slow phase arises from the fraction of myosin as actin-S1-ADP, from which ADP must first dissociate before ATP can bind.
For R672H, the observed rate constant of the slower phase remains constant, whereas the amplitude increases at increasing ADP concentration. In contrast, the fast phase amplitude decreases, whereas the observed rate constant also remains constant (Fig. 4C). A similar behavior was also seen for the R672C mutation. When the fast and slow phase amplitudes are plotted against ADP concentration, both could be described by a hyperbolic function (Fig. 4D shows both phases for R672H and the slow R672C phase), giving an overall ADP affinity (K′5). Comparing these three FSS mutants with WT MyHC-emb, the ADP affinity of R672H is about 3-fold tighter, whereas for R672C and T178I, this parameter is not significantly affected (Table 1).
FSS Mutations Reduce the Affinity of Actin for Myosin S1 but Increase Actin Affinity in the Presence of ADP
By preincubating 30 nm pyrene-labeled actin (concentration before mixing) with varied S1 concentrations and then rapidly mixing with 20 μm ATP (concentration before mixing; Fig. 5A), it is possible to determine actin affinity (KA; Fig. 5B). This measurement was repeated for the three FSS mutations. R672C and T178I have a similar KA value as WT MyHC-emb, whereas R672H has an affinity almost 20-fold weaker compared with WT MyHC-emb (Table 1).
This assay was repeated with a constant saturating ADP concentration (20 times the K′5 value) preincubated with the actin-S1 mixture to determine the actin affinity in the presence of ADP (KDA). The affinity of the WT MyHC-emb for actin weakens 250-fold (Fig. 5C). All of the mutants, however, have an affinity 2–4-fold tighter than the WT (Table 1).
Nucleotide Binding to Myosin S1 in the Absence of Actin
In the absence of actin, ATP binding to myosin can be monitored by a change in the intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence. The fluorescence change is caused by structural changes induced by both ATP binding and the ATP hydrolysis step (Scheme 1, steps 1–3). Although the binding of ATP to myosin is not part of the working cross-bridge cycle, the hydrolysis step controls how long myosin remains detached from actin.
The FSS Mutations Reduce the ATP Binding and Hydrolysis Rates for MyHC-emb S1
The binding and hydrolysis of ATP by myosin was observed via the intrinsic fluorescence of S1. S1 at 100 nm was mixed with varying concentrations of ATP (Fig. 6A).
All three FSS mutants have significantly slower kobs values and smaller amplitudes than WT MyHC-emb. The amplitudes are greatly reduced in the R672H and T178I mutations, and increasing the S1 concentration does not increase the amplitude for either of these two mutants. The second order rate constant of ATP binding, K1k+2, was determined by varying the ATP concentration and plotting kobs as a function of ATP (Fig. 6B). ATP binding for WT MyHC-emb is about 2-fold faster than for β-myosin S1, and all three mutants have significantly lower second order rate constants compared with WT MyHC-emb (Table 1). The three FSS mutations strongly reduce ATP binding to myosin S1 compared with WT MyHC-emb.
The maximum rate of ATP binding for WT MyHC-emb (kmax) was also determined from the hyperbolic fits (Fig. 6B and Table 1). The value of kmax can either be attributed to the maximum rate of ATP binding (k+2) with switch 1 and switch 2 closing or the hydrolysis step (k+3 + k−3), which will be addressed under “Discussion.”
ADP Affinity Is Very Tight for WT MyHC-emb and R672C
The ADP affinity of myosin-S1 can be measured by preincubating S1 with varying concentrations of ADP and rapidly mixing with excess ATP to displace the ADP. A two-phase reaction is expected, consisting of a fast and a slow element representing the ATP binding to free S1 and ADP being displaced, respectively (Fig. 6C). Increasing the concentration of ADP does not alter the kobs for the fast or slow phase but does affect the amplitudes (Fig. 6D) because more of the S1 is occupied by ADP that has to be displaced (slow phase) before ATP can bind. The measurement was repeated for each of the FSS mutations. However, the low fluorescence amplitudes observed on binding ATP made these measurements very difficult. The assay was only successful for R672C, and even then it was only possible to observe the loss of the fast phase. Using Equation 5, the ADP affinity (K5) could be determined; however, it was not significantly different from that of the WT MyHC-emb (Table 1). ADP displacement could not be measured for R672H and T178I due to a low signal upon nucleotide binding. Attempts to measure ADP binding using fluorescent nucleotides mant- and coumarin-modified ATP or ADP also result in no apparent change in fluorescence for R672H and T178I.
The Vmax and Km Values of the Three FSS Mutants Are Reduced
The ATPase activity of the WT MyHC-emb and the three FSS mutants was measured as described under “Materials and Methods.” Both the values of Vmax and Km are significantly greater for WT than those for the mutants (Fig. 7A). T178I data were plotted on a log [actin] scale (Fig. 7B) to highlight that there is activation along with the increase in actin concentration. However, the Km is so low and the Vmax is so slow that this appears as a linear fit in Fig. 7A. The values of Vmax and Km are summarized in Table 1 along with the Vmax/Km.
Homology Models of the WT MyHC-emb and Mutant Motor Domains Show Disrupted Interactions between the ATP Binding Pocket and Relay Helix in the Mutant Proteins
We examined the local structural interaction of the two mutated residues Arg672 and Thr178 using embryonic homology models based on both scallop myosin II crystal structures. These two residues are highly conserved throughout the myosin family and conserved in embryonic, cardiac, and scallop myosin.
The homology models of WT MyHC-emb show that residue Arg672 is buried in the core of the myosin molecule, located on the β3 strand of the central sheet. Arg672 interacts with residues on the two β-strands on either side (β2 and β4) and also with a residue located on the relay helix (Phe490). We will focus on two key interactions here, whereas a more detailed summary of interactions can be found in Tables 2 and 3.
TABLE 2.
TABLE 3.
One key interaction is the hydrogen bond between Arg672 and residue Thr178. Thr178 is located on β4 at the base of the P-loop, which is involved in ATP binding and hydrolysis. This Arg672-Thr178 interaction is found in all conformational states available for WT MyHC-emb, indicating that this hydrogen bond is preserved as the myosin molecule goes through the cross-bridge cycle. For both the T178I and R672C mutations, this hydrogen bond is lost in all myosin homology models, whereas for the R672H mutant, this hydrogen bond remains present in the majority of the structures.
Another key interaction is the π-cation bond between Arg672 and residue Phe490. Phe490 is located on the relay helix close to a bend in the helix that develops during the recovery stroke and recovers at some point during the power stroke. This interaction is present in all WT MyHC-emb homology models but is found to be consistently lost in both R672H and R672C mutations throughout the cycle. From our modeling, it is difficult to know if the loss of the hydrogen bond between the Thr178 and Arg672 in the T178I mutant results in disruption of the π-cation bond between Arg672 and Phe490.
Arg672, located on the central β-sheet, appears to facilitate interaction between the β4 strand and the relay helix. Note that Thr178 is at the end of the β4 strand and is immediately adjacent to the P-loop motif 179GESGAG184. This motif is one of three loops that bind to the γ-Pi of ATP. Loss of coupling of P-loop movements to the relay helix by mutation to either Arg672 or Thr178 is expected to cause major disruption of the cross-bridge cycle.
Discussion
WT MyHC-emb Has Properties of a Slow Type Myosin but Differs Significantly from the Classic Slow Type Myosin, MyHC-β
To our knowledge, this is the first complete kinetic analysis of the human embryonic myosin S1 isoform. Comparison of the kinetic properties of WT MyHC-emb with the slow WT MyHC-β (see Table 1 and Fig. 9) shows that there are significant differences between the two.
The high affinity of ADP for actin-myosin (K′5 = 14 μm) and the slow rate constant for ADP release from actin-myosin (k′+5 = 22 s−1) are indicators of a slow type myosin (40). The slow ADP release would result in a relatively long lived actin·myosin·ADP complex (lifetime 1/k′+5 = 45 ms versus 17 ms for MyHC-β under these conditions) that has high affinity for actin (KDA = 0.53 μm) and therefore could hold tension against a load. The slow ADP release rate constant is likely to limit the maximum shortening velocity (Vo = d/τ = working stroke/attached life time) to 5–10 nm/45 ms = 0.1–0.2 μm/s. At the same time, the ATPase Vmax is similar for the two WT isoforms (6.0 and 7.0 s−1), resulting in a higher unloaded duty ratio for the embryonic myosin (duty ratio = Vmax/k′+5 = 0.33) compared with the β-myosin (0.10).
The second order rate constant for ATP binding to actin-S1 (K′1k′+2) is 2-fold faster for MyHC-emb than for MyHC-β. This is due to ATP affinity for actin-S1 (K′1) being almost 4-fold tighter (84 versus 327 μm) for emb-S1, whereas the maximum rate of actin dissociation (k′+2, 780 versus 1500 s−1) is half that of MyHC- β. This means that the detachment of actin is slower at saturating ATP but much less sensitive to the concentration of ATP available than the MyHC-β. This could be important because the MyHC-emb could maintain its activity in fluctuating ATP concentrations.
The fluorescence change associated with ATP binding to MyHC-emb S1 in the absence of actin is similar to that of β-cardiac S1 (39). The maximum kobs for this process at saturating ATP concentrations is also 30% faster and close to that expected for a fast muscle myosin. This fluorescence change has normally been assigned to the steps controlling ATP hydrolysis and the recovery stroke (k+3 + k−3). ADP binding gave less than half of the fluorescence change for ATP binding to MyHC-emb, suggesting that the signal does primarily result from the change in the local environment of the conserved tryptophan at the end of the relay helix that is known to report the recovery stroke and hydrolysis step (41, 42). ADP affinity in the absence of actin is almost 4 times tighter for MyHC-emb than MyHC-β. However, in the presence of actin, the reverse is true. ADP affinity is almost 2-fold weaker for MyHC-emb. This results in a large increase in the thermodynamic coupling constant for ADP (K′5/K5), which increases almost 10-fold from 11.5 for MyHC-β to 95 for MyHC-emb. Thus, actin is much more effective at displacing ADP for MyHC-emb than for MyHC-β.
In summary, our data are consistent with MyHC-emb myosin being a slow type motor with a high nucleotide affinity, as recently described by Racca et al. (11). Our data also show that ATP binding (K′1k′+2) is 2-fold faster than that of MyHC-β, which is suggestive of a fast type myosin (43). However, the ADP release rate (k′+5) is almost 3 times slower than MyHC-β, which is indicative of a slow type myosin. Therefore, MyHC-emb properties sit between the fast and slow type myosins.
The Three FSS Mutations Significantly Slow the Cross-bridge Cycle Speed and Alter the Balance of the Cycle at Various Steps
The Vmax for the ATPase cycle is reduced substantially (2–30-fold) for all three mutations with at least 10-fold increases in the apparent affinity of actin (Km). The rate constant for ADP release (limiting cross-bridge detachment) is little changed for T178I and R672C but reduced to one-third for the R672H mutant. This results in estimates of the duty ratio (equal to k′+5/Vmax) being reduced in each case from 0.3 for WT MyHC-emb to ∼0.18 for the two Arg672 mutations and very low for T178I (0.008). The two Arg672 mutation myosins would be able to sustain a lower force than the WT MyHC-emb, and T178I would be very ineffective as a force holding myosin, consistent with this mutation having the most severe phenotype (11).
The major differences between the WT MyHC-emb and the three mutations in the cross-bridge cycle are ATP-induced dissociation of actin from actin-S1 (K′1k′+2), ATP binding to S1 (K1k+2), and ATP hydrolysis (k+2 or k+3 + k−3) (see Table 1 and Fig. 9). The results suggest that ATP binding is slower than for WT MyHC-emb for all three mutations, by a factor of 2–5 for actin-S1 (K′1k′+2) and by 5–30-fold for S1 alone (K1k+2). The slowed rate constant for ATP binding is unlikely to have any physiological affect because the ATP in the cell is maintained at >1 mm, and each construct would be expected to bind ATP within 1 ms. The maximum rate constant of actin dissociation is, however, reduced 2–3-fold for the two Arg672 mutations, and this would result in a longer lived actin·myosin complex (2–3 ms).
One of the most striking changes is the reduction of k+3 + k−3 by 5–10-fold. If this represents the ATP hydrolysis step, then this would be a significant slowing of the ATPase cycle, leading to the myosin spending more time detached from actin in each ATPase cycle. This is highlighted in comparing the rate constant of the hydrolysis step (k+3 + k−3) with the Vmax of the ATPase. For WT MyHC-emb, the hydrolysis rate constant is more than 20 times the value of Vmax, whereas it is reduced to 10- and 7-fold for the two Arg672 mutations.
A second point of interest is actin affinity with and without ADP present. In the absence of ADP, the actin affinities (KA) of the three mutants are significantly reduced compared with the WT MyHC-emb. However, because the experiments were conducted with 30 nm pyrene-labeled actin and the KA values are <10 nm (except for R672H), we can only conclude that the affinities are very tight and may even be the same. We can, however, say that the affinity of R672H for actin is significantly reduced, almost 20-fold weaker. The affinity in the presence of ADP (KDA), on the other hand, is 1.5–4-fold tighter for all three mutants compared with the WT MyHC-emb. The only significant difference between the three mutants for ADP affinity in the presence of actin was the R672H, where K5 was 3-fold tighter.
From these data (Table 1), it is clear that all three of the mutations have significant kinetic differences compared with the WT MyHC-emb. The common difference between the three is the reduced apparent rate of ATP hydrolysis.
The Interaction between Arg672 and the Relay Helix Is Lost for the FSS Mutation
This investigation was limited by the lack of tryptophan fluorescence change on ADP binding in the three mutants. Homology models for each mutation suggest a possible explanation for this loss of fluorescence. Arg672 and Phe490 (on the relay helix) form a π-cation bond, which is lost with the two Arg672 mutations. R672H has the potential to form π-π bonds (44), but none were observed in the homology models. These π-cation interactions form between positive ions or protein residues and the π face of a benzene ring or other aromatic structure (45). These interactions can be as strong as or even stronger than salt bridges, so a complete loss of such a contact could have a large effect on the protein. During the ATPase cycle, the C terminus of the relay helix bends away from the β-sheet, with the tryptophan immediately after the relay helix reporting a change in fluorescence as it moves. Homology models for the rigor-like conformation of myosin (PDB code 2OS8) and the pre-power stroke conformation (PDB code 1QVI) revealed that Phe490 is located just before the point in the relay helix where it bends as part of the power stroke/recovery stroke (Fig. 8A). Phe490 is one of three phenylalanines (Fig. 8B) that had previously been identified as part of a fulcrum on the relay helix in myosin S1 (46). This work also showed that Phe489 and Phe490 sandwich Phe670, forming the fulcrum that stays locked together through the whole transition. It is possible that the π-cation bond between Arg672 and Phe490 plays a structural role in holding the fulcrum together and maintaining contact with the β-sheet in which Arg672 sits.
Complete loss of this interaction in both Arg672 mutations could disrupt the structure of the fulcrum, making it less stable. This translates into a loss of amplitude in the tryptophan fluorescence signal, which indicates that the relay helix is not moving properly in the recovery stroke, and a slowing of the hydrolysis step linked to the recovery stroke. This complements the findings that the specific force of the R672C was reduced (13) because the conformational changes in the ATP and actin binding domains are not efficiently relayed to the converter domain and neck region.
A second important interaction is the hydrogen bond between Arg672 and Thr178. In the two mutations, R672C and T178I, this hydrogen bond is completely lost, and it is partially lost in the R672H. Destabilization of this region is the probable cause for the reduction in the k+2 or k+3 + k−3 step seen for all three mutations. Therefore, this bond between Arg672 and Thr178 must have some structural importance, bringing the residues required for hydrolysis into proximity with the ATP. The loss of this bond could account for the reduction in the ATP hydrolysis rate. The reduction in tryptophan fluorescence in the T178I mutant also suggests that the bond between Arg672 and Thr178 is having an indirect effect on the π-cation bond from Arg672 to the relay helix.
The FSS Mutations Slow Down the Dissociation Rate and, Once Detached, Spend Longer Not Bound to Actin, Leading to a Longer ATPase Cycle Time
Our data support the finding that a longer, slower rate of relaxation as seen for FSS mutants could be explained by a reduced rate of detachment (13). There was a 2–5-fold reduction in the second order rate constant for detachment (K′1k′+2) for the three mutations (Fig. 9). However, the reduction in the ATP hydrolysis step that we have seen is a novel observation for the three FSS mutations. It is most likely that the destabilizing effects of the mutations on the P-loop are having a detrimental effect on ATP binding and ATP hydrolysis. Furthermore, the loss of interactions between the central β-sheet and the relay helix may hamper conformational changes within the molecule, leading to the actin dissociation step. Both would lead to a longer cycling time, where the myosin is bound to actin for longer or delayed in hydrolyzing ATP. This would leave the myosin mainly in the myosin·ATP or actin·myosin·ATP state, increasing the ATPase cycle time.
As the major myosin isoform expressed in embryonic development, the effects of the mutant alleles of embryonic myosin should manifest themselves during the formation of skeletal muscle and its earliest function. Just as with most myosin-based myopathies, the vast majority of reported cases of FSS are heterozygous, the prediction being that homozygous individuals would be inviable. It is noteworthy that FSS, a form of distal arthrogryposis, affects muscles in the lower legs and forearms, which appear to develop early relative to proximal skeletal muscle in fetal development (18). The timing and abundant expression of the mutant isoform during this stage could explain the symptoms seen post-birth, at a time when the expression of embryonic myosin has decreased significantly. Consistent with the joint contracture phenotype, these FSS mutations display severely reduced rate constants for cross-bridge detachment and slower cycling times. Understanding how the mutant myosin influences muscle contraction at different levels of expression along with the WT MyHC-emb myosin or an up-regulation of other myosins would be important to determine. We are currently developing models to allow prediction of the behavior of different myosin isoforms in a sarcomere (47, 48).
Author Contributions
C. V. produced gene constructs, grew adenovirus, transfected cell lines to produce all cell pellets, and carried out steady state ATPase assays. J. W. purified proteins from cell pellets provided by C. V. and performed all transient kinetic assays except for the preliminary studies performed by M. J. B. L. L. and M. A. G. designed the study and supervised data collection. All authors contributed to the interpretation of data and writing and editing of the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
We thank Ariana Combs, Steve Langer, and Max Gamelspacher for assistance with cloning and protein production, MyoKardia for providing bovine actin, and Samantha Lynn for production of pyrene-labeled rabbit actin.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM29090 (to L. L.) and Wellcome Trust Grant 085309 (to M. A. G.). The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.
- MyHC
- human sarcomeric myosin heavy chain
- FSS
- Freeman-Sheldon syndrome
- PDB
- Protein Data Bank.
References
- 1. Oldfors A. (2007) Hereditary myosin myopathies. Neuromusc. Disord. 17, 355–367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Hamady M., Buvoli M., Leinwand L.A., and Knight R. (2010) Estimate of the abundance of cardiomyopathic mutations in the β-myosin gene. Int. J. Cardiol. 144, 124–126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Clarke N. F., Amburgey K., Teener J., Camelo-Piragua S., Kesari A., Punetha J., Waddell L. B., Davis M., Laing N. G., Monnier N., North K. N., Hoffman E. P., and Dowling J. J. (2013) A novel mutation expands the genetic and clinical spectrum of MYH7-related myopathies. Neuromusc. Disord. 23, 432–436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Lamont P. J., Wallefeld W., Hilton-Jones D., Udd B., Argov Z., Barboi A.C., Bonneman C., Boycott K. M., Bushby K., Connolly A. M., Davies N., Beggs A. H., Cox G. F., Dastgir J., DeChene E. T., et al. (2014) Novel mutations widen the phenotypic spectrum of slow skeletal/β-cadiac myosin (MYH7) distal myopathy. Human Mutation 35, 868–879 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Yüceyar N., Ayhan Ö., Karasoy H., and Tolun A. (2015) Homozygous MYH7R1820W mutation results in recessive myosin storage myopathy: scapuloperoneal and respiratory weakness with dilated cardiomyopathy. Neuromusc. Disord. 25, 340–344 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Schiaffino S., Rossi A. C., Smerdu V., Leinwand L. A., and Reggiani C. (2015) Developmental myosins: expression patterns and functional significance. Skelet. Muscle 5, 22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Fidziańska A. (1980) Human ontogensis. I. Ultrastructural characteristics of developing human muscle. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 39, 476–486 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Barbet J. P., Thornell L. E., and Butler-Browne G. S. (1991) Immunocytochemical characterisation of two generations of fibers during the development of the human quadiceps muscle. Mech. Dev. 35, 3–11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Draeger A., Weeds A. G., and Fitzsimons R. B. (1987) Primary, secondary and tertiary myotubes in developing skeletal muscle: a new approach to the analysis of human myogenesis. J. Neurol. Sci. 81, 19–43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Cho M., Webster S. G., and Blau H. M. (1993) Evidence for myoblast-extrinsic regulation of slow myosin heavy chain expression during muscle fiber formation in embryonic development. J. Cell Biol. 121, 795–810 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Racca A. W., Beck A. E., Rao V. S., Flint G. V., Lundy S. D., Born D. E., Bamshad M. J., and Regnier M. (2013) Contractility of kinetics of human fetal and human adult skeletal muscle. J. Physiol. 591, 3049–3061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Ecob-Prince M., Hill M., and Brown W. (1989) Immunocytochemical demonstration of myosin heavy chain expression in human muscle. J. Neurol. Sci. 91, 71–78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Racca A. W., Beck A. E., McMillin M. J., Korte F. S., Bamshad M. J., and Regnier M. (2015) The embryonic myosin R672C mutation that underlies Freeman-Sheldon syndrome impairs cross-bridge detachment and cycling in adult skeletal muscle. Hum. Mol. Genet. 24, 3348–3358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Beck A. E., McMillin M. J., Gildersleeve H. I. S., Shively K. M. B., Tang A., and Bamshad M. J. (2014) Genotype-phenotype relationships in Freeman-Sheldon syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 164, 2808–2813 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Tajsharghi H., Kimber E., Kroksmark A. K., Jerre R., Tulinius M., and Oldfors A. (2008) Embryonic myosin heavy-chain mutations cause distal arthrogyposis and developmental myosin myopathy that persists postnatally. Arch. Neurol. 65, 1083–1090 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Toydemir R. M., Rutherford A., Whitby F. G., Jorde L. B., Carey J. C., and Bamshad M. (2006) Mutations in embryonic myosin heavy chain (MYH3) cause Freeman-sheldon syndrome and Sheldon-Hall syndrome. Nat. Genet. 38, 561–565 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Ontell M.P., Sopper M.M., Lyons G., Buckingham M., and Ontell M. (1993) Modulation of contractile protein gene expression in fetal murine crural muscles: emergence of muscle diversity. Dev. Dyn. 198, 203–213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Preller M., and Holmes K. C. (2013) The myosin start-of-power stroke state and how actin binding drives the power stroke. Cytoskeleton 70, 651–660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Sweeney H. L., and Houdusse A. (2010) Structural and functional insights into the myosin motor mechanism. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 39, 539–557 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Resnicow D. I., Deacon J. C., Warrick H. M., Spudich J. A., and Leinwand L. A. (2010) Functional diversity among a family of human skeletal muscle myosin motors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 1053–1058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Wang Q., Moncman C. L., and Winkelmann D. A. (2003) Mutations in the motor domain modulate myosin activity and myofibril organization. J. Cell Sci. 116, 4227–4238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Bloemink M., Deacon J., Langer S., Vera C., Combs A., Leinwand L., and Geeves M. A. (2014) The hypertrophic cardiomyopathy myosin mutation R453C alters ATP binding and hydrolysis of human cardiac β-myosin. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 5158–5167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Sommese R. F., Sung J., Nag S., Sutton S., Deacon J.C., Choe E., Leinwand L. A., Ruppel K., and Spudich J. A. (2013) Molecular consequences of the R453C hypertrophic cardiomyopathy mutation on human β-cardiac myosin motor function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 12607–12612 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Nag S., Sommese R. F., Ujfalusi Z., Combs A., Langer S., Sutton S., Leinwand L. A., Geeves M. A., Ruppel K. M., and Spudich J. A. (2015) Contractility parameters of human β-cardiac myosin with the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy mutation R403Q show loss of motor function. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Bottinelli R., and Reggiani C. (2000) Human skeletal muscle fibres: molecular and functional diversity. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 73, 195–262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Mittereder N., March K. L., and Trapnell B. C. (1996) Evaluation of the concentration and bioactivity of adenovirus vectors for gene therapy. J. Virol. 70, 7498–7509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Pardee J. D., and Spudich J. A. (1982) Purification of muscle actin. Methods Enzymol. 85, 164–181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Criddle A. H., Geeves M. A., and Jeffries T. (1985) The use of actin labelled with N-(1-pyrenyl)iodoacetamide to study the interaction of actin with myosin subfragments and troponin/tropomyosin. Biochem. J. 232, 343–349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Furch M., Geeves M. A., and Manstein D. J. (1998) Modulation of actin affinity and actomyosin adenosine triphosphatase by charge changes in the myosin motor domain. Biochemistry 37, 6317–6326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Bagshaw C. R., and Trentham D. R. (1973) The reversibility of adenosine triphosphate cleavage by myosin. Biochem. J. 133, 323–328 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Kurzawa S. E., and Geeves M. A. (1996) A novel stopped-flow method for measuring the affinity of actin for myosin head freagment using microgram quantities of protein. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 17, 669–676 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Biasini M., Bienert S., Waterhouse A., Arnold K., Studer G., Schmidt T., Kiefer F., Gallo Cassarino T., Bertoni M., Bordoli L., and Schwede T. (2014) SWISS-MODEL: modelling protein tertiary and quaternary structure using evolutionary information. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W252–W258 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Arnold K., Bordoli L., Kopp J., and Schwede T. (2006) The SWISS-MODEL Workspace: a web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics 22, 195–201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Guex N., Peitsch M.C., and Schwede T. (2009) Automated comparative protein structure modeling with SWISS-MODEL and Swiss-PdbViewer: a historical perspective. Electrophoresis 30, S162–S173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Kiefer F., Arnold K., Künzli M., Bordoli L., and Schwede T. (2009) The SWISS-MODEL Repository and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D387–D392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Bloemink M. J., Adamek N., Reggiani C., and Geeves M. A. (2007) Kinetic analysis of the slow skeletal myosin MHC-1 isoform from bovine masseter muscle. J. Mol. Biol. 373, 1184–1197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Cooke R., and Pate E. (1985) The effects of ADP and phosphate on the contraction of muscle fibers. Biophys. J. 48, 789–798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Siemankowski R. F., Wiseman M. O., and White H. D. (1985) ADP dissociation from actomyosin subfragment 1 is sufficiently slow to limit the unloaded shortening velocity in vertebrate muscle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82, 658–662 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Deacon J. C., Bloemink M. J., Rezavandi H., Geeves M. A., and Leinwand L. A. (2012) Erratum to: Identification of functional differences between recombinant human α and β cardiac myosin motors. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 69, 4239–4255 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Bloemink M. J., and Geeves M. A. (2011) Shaking the myosin family tree: biochemical kinetics defines four types of myosin motor. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 22, 961–967 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Geeves M. A., and Holmes K. C. (1999) Structural mechanism of muscle contraction. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68, 687–728 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Málnási-Csizmadia A., Pearson D. S., Kovács M., Woolley R. J., Geeves M. A., and Bagshaw C. R. (2001) Kinetic resolution of a conformational transition and the ATP hydrolysis step using relaxation methods with a Dictyostelium myosin II mutant containing a single tryptophan residue. Biochemistry 40, 12727–12737 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Bloemink M. J., Deacon J. C., Resnicow D. I., Leinwand L. A., and Geeves M. A. (2013) The superfast human extraocular myosin is kinetically distinct from the fast skeletal IIa, IIb, and IId isoforms. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 27469–27479 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Wheeler S. E., and Bloom J. W. (2014) Toward a more complete understanding of noncovalent interactions involving aromatic rings. J. Phys. Chem. A 118, 6133–6147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Dougherty D. A. (1996) Cation-π interaction in chemistry and biology: a new view of benzene, Phe, Tyr, and Trp. Science 271, 163–168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Fischer S., Windshügel B., Horak D., Holmes K. C., and Smith J. C. (2005) Structural mechanism of the recovery stroke in the Myosin molecular motor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 6873–6878 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Mijailovich S. M., Stojanovic B., Djordje N., and Geeves M. A. (2015) Activation and releaxation kinetics in skeletal and cardiac muscles. Biophys. J. 108, 337a–338a [Google Scholar]
- 48. Mijailovich S. M., Djordje N., Svicevic M., Stojanovic B., and Geeves M. A. (2015) Modelling the calcium dependent actin-myosin ATP-ase cycle in solution. Biophys. J. 108, 594a [Google Scholar]