Skip to main content
Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology logoLink to Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology
. 2002 Aug 1;107(4):327–337. doi: 10.6028/jres.107.026

Electron-Impact Cross Sections for Dipole- and Spin-Allowed Excitations of Hydrogen, Helium, and Lithium

Philip M Stone 1, Yong-Ki Kim 1, J P Desclaux 2
PMCID: PMC4859265  PMID: 27446734

Abstract

Electron-impact excitation cross sections are presented for the dipole- and spin allowed transitions from the ground states to the np 2P states for hydrogen and lithium, and to the 1snp 1P states for helium, n = 2 through 10. Two scaling formulas developed earlier by Kim [Phys. Rev. A 64, 032713 (2001)] for plane-wave Born cross sections are used. The scaled Born cross sections are in excellent agreement with available theoretical and experimental data.

Keywords: electron-impact, excitation cross section, hydrogen, helium, lithium

1. Introduction

We have scaled Plane-Wave Born (PWB) cross sections to calculate dipole- and spin-allowed excitation cross sections from the ground state of neutral hydrogen, helium, and lithium. The scaling method was developed by one of us [1], and uses two simple scaling formulas to convert PWB excitation cross sections into reliable cross sections comparable to the most accurate theoretical or experimental data available for dipole-allowed transitions. The PWB cross sections are calculated from uncorrelated wave functions, and the scaling requires only the binding energy B of the electron being excited, the excitation energy E, and an accurate dipole oscillator strength f for the transition. The oscillator strength is needed only if electron correlation strongly affects the f value, i.e., when the wave functions used to calculate the PWB cross section are not accurate. Simplicity of the method to scale PWB cross sections allows us to generate a large number of cross sections reliably and quickly.

In this paper, we present calculated excitation cross sections for hydrogen from the 1s 2S ground state to the np 2P excited states. For helium, the cross sections are given for excitations from the 1s2 1S ground state to the 1snp 1P excited states. For lithium, the results are given for excitations from the 1s22s 2S ground state to the 1s2np 2P states. In all cases, the values of n are from n = 2 through 10.

2. Outline of Theory

A PWB cross section for electron-impact excitation, σPWB, has the form

σPWB=4πa02RTFPWB(T), (1)

where T is the incident electron energy, a0 is the Bohr radius (0.529 Å), and R is the Rydberg energy (13.61 eV). The FPWB(T) is the collision strength (different from the standard definition by a multiplicative constant).

The first scaling method, BE scaling, replaces T in the denominator of Eq. (1) by T + B + E, i.e.,

σBE=σPWB[T/(T+B+E)]. (2)

This scaling is similar to a scaling for ionization cross sections used earlier by Burgess [2], who shifted the incident energy T by B+U, where U is the kinetic energy of the target electron. However, in the BE scaling adopted by Kim [1] for excitation cross sections, T is shifted by B+E. The BE scaling not only changes the magnitude but also the shape of the original PWB cross sections. The BE scaling corrects the deficiency in the collision theory; i.e., the use of the PWB approximation.

The second scaling formula, the f scaling, multiplies the entire cross section by the ratio of an accurate f value to the less accurate f value calculated by the actual wave functions used to generate the unscaled PWB cross sections:

σf=(faccu/fsc)σPWsc. (3)

where fsc is the single configuration (or uncorrelated) f value and faccu is the more accurate value obtained from correlated (or multiconfiguration) wave functions or from a reliable experiment. Accurate f values are frequently available [3]. The f scaling compensates for the inadequacy of the wave functions when electron correlation effect is significant. The BE and f scalings may be applied consecutively, i.e.,

σBEf=(faccu/fsc)σBEsc, (4)

where σBEsc is the BE-scaled PWB cross section calculated from single-configuration wave functions.

Kim has shown many examples [1] in which the BE scaling alone or in combination with the f scaling transformed PWB cross sections for dipole-allowed and spin-allowed excitations into reliable cross sections comparable to the convergent close coupling (CCC) method [4] or accurate experiments.

In reality, electron-impact excitation cross sections of atoms have resonances in the vicinity of the excitation thresholds caused by the formation of transient compound states between the incident electron and the target atom. First-order perturbation theories such as the PWB approximation cannot account for such compound states, and hence the present scaled cross sections do not exhibit any resonances.

The numerical data in Tables 1, 2, and 3 can easily be extended to higher incident energies by using the well known Bethe formula [5] for the plane-wave Born approximation for fast (but nonrelativistic) incident electrons. In our notation, the asymptotic expression becomes:

σasympt(T)=4πa02RT+B+E[aln(T/R)+b+cR/T](faccu/fsc), (5)

where a, b, and c are dimensionless constants. Equation (5) should be used for T > 3 keV. The values of a, b, and c are included in Tables 1, 2, and 3. Note that a relativistic form (5) of Eq. (5) should be used for T > 10 keV.

Table 1.

Hydrogen. Excitation energies E in eV, dipole f values, and BE–scaled excitation cross sections σBE in Å2 as functions of incident electron energy T in eV. The experimental ionization energy B = 13.5984 eV has been used in the scaling. The constants a, b, and c of Eq. (5) are included

Excitation 1s–2p 1s–3p 1s–4p 1s–5p 1s–6p 1s–7p 1s–8p 1s–9p 1s–10p
E 10.204 12.094 12.755 13.061 13.228 13.328 13.393 13.438 13.470
f 0.4164 0.0791 0.0290 0.0139 0.00780 0.004816 0.003185 0.002217 0.001606
Const.a 0.555512 0.089083 0.030956 0.014534 0.008031 0.004919 0.003237 0.002246 0.001623
Const. b 0.271785 0.060202 0.022984 0.011243 0.006348 0.003939 0.002550 0.001824 0.001323
Const. c 0.000112 −0.019775 −0.009279 −0.004880 −0.002853 −0.001806 −0.001213 −0.000854 −0.000623
T σBE σBE σBE σBE σBE σBE σBE σBE σBE
11 0.15876
12 0.24099
13 0.30186 0.03033 0.00573
14 0.35119 0.04382 0.01274 0.00528 0.00267 0.00154 0.000965 0.000646 0.000455
15 0.39256 0.05372 0.01697 0.00752 0.00401 0.00240 0.00155 0.00106 0.000763
16 0.42786 0.06166 0.02018 0.00916 0.00496 0.00300 0.00195 0.00135 0.000969
17 0.45828 0.06827 0.02278 0.01046 0.00570 0.00346 0.00227 0.00157 0.00113
18 0.48468 0.07387 0.02496 0.01154 0.00632 0.00385 0.00252 0.00175 0.00126
19 0.50768 0.07867 0.02681 0.01245 0.00684 0.00417 0.00274 0.00190 0.00137
20 0.52779 0.08282 0.02840 0.01323 0.00728 0.00445 0.00292 0.00202 0.00146
21 0.54540 0.08642 0.02977 0.01391 0.00766 0.00468 0.00308 0.00213 0.00154
22 0.56084 0.08957 0.03096 0.01449 0.00799 0.00489 0.00321 0.00223 0.00161
23 0.57439 0.09231 0.03200 0.01500 0.00828 0.00507 0.00333 0.00231 0.00167
24 0.58627 0.09472 0.03291 0.01544 0.00853 0.00522 0.00344 0.00238 0.00172
26 0.60580 0.09867 0.03440 0.01617 0.00894 0.00548 0.00361 0.00250 0.00181
28 0.62069 0.10169 0.03554 0.01673 0.00925 0.00567 0.00373 0.00259 0.00187
30 0.63189 0.10398 0.03641 0.01715 0.00949 0.00582 0.00383 0.00266 0.00192
32 0.64013 0.10569 0.03706 0.01747 0.00967 0.00593 0.00391 0.00271 0.00196
34 0.64597 0.10695 0.03754 0.01771 0.00981 0.00602 0.00396 0.00275 0.00199
36 0.64986 0.10782 0.03788 0.01787 0.00990 0.00608 0.00400 0.00278 0.00201
38 0.65216 0.10840 0.03811 0.01799 0.00997 0.00612 0.00403 0.00280 0.00202
40 0.65315 0.10872 0.03825 0.01806 0.01001 0.00614 0.00405 0.00281 0.00203
45 0.65130 0.10870 0.03828 0.01808 0.01002 0.00615 0.00405 0.00281 0.00204
50 0.64520 0.10787 0.03801 0.01796 0.00996 0.00611 0.00403 0.00280 0.00202
55 0.63647 0.10654 0.03756 0.01775 0.00984 0.00604 0.00398 0.00277 0.00200
60 0.62615 0.10490 0.03700 0.01749 0.00970 0.00595 0.00392 0.00273 0.00197
65 0.61489 0.10308 0.03636 0.01719 0.00953 0.00585 0.00386 0.00268 0.00194
70 0.60315 0.10116 0.03569 0.01688 0.00936 0.00575 0.00379 0.00263 0.00190
75 0.59121 0.09919 0.03500 0.01655 0.00918 0.00564 0.00371 0.00258 0.00187
80 0.57929 0.09721 0.03431 0.01622 0.00900 0.00552 0.00364 0.00253 0.00183
85 0.56750 0.09524 0.03362 0.01590 0.00882 0.00541 0.00357 0.00248 0.00179
90 0.55593 0.09331 0.03294 0.01557 0.00864 0.00530 0.00350 0.00243 0.00176
95 0.54465 0.09142 0.03227 0.01526 0.00846 0.00520 0.00343 0.00238 0.00172
100 0.53369 0.08959 0.03162 0.01495 0.00829 0.00509 0.00336 0.00233 0.00169
110 0.51276 0.08607 0.03038 0.01437 0.00797 0.00489 0.00323 0.00224 0.00162
120 0.49322 0.08278 0.02922 0.01382 0.00766 0.00471 0.00310 0.00215 0.00156
130 0.47500 0.07972 0.02814 0.01331 0.00738 0.00453 0.00299 0.00207 0.00150
140 0.45805 0.07686 0.02713 0.01283 0.00712 0.00437 0.00288 0.00200 0.00145
150 0.44227 0.07420 0.02619 0.01238 0.00687 0.00422 0.00278 0.00193 0.00140
160 0.42756 0.07171 0.02531 0.01197 0.00664 0.00408 0.00269 0.00187 0.00135
170 0.41383 0.06940 0.02449 0.01158 0.00642 0.00394 0.00260 0.00181 0.00131
180 0.40100 0.06723 0.02372 0.01122 0.00622 0.00382 0.00252 0.00175 0.00126
190 0.38898 0.06520 0.02301 0.01088 0.00603 0.00370 0.00244 0.00170 0.00123
200 0.37771 0.06330 0.02233 0.01056 0.00586 0.00360 0.00237 0.00165 0.00119
250 0.33045 0.05533 0.01952 0.00923 0.00512 0.00314 0.00207 0.00144 0.00104
300 0.29445 0.04926 0.01737 0.00821 0.00455 0.00280 0.00184 0.00128 0.000925
350 0.26607 0.04447 0.01568 0.00741 0.00411 0.00252 0.00166 0.00115 0.000835
400 0.24309 0.04060 0.01431 0.00676 0.00375 0.00230 0.00152 0.00105 0.000762
450 0.22408 0.03741 0.01318 0.00623 0.00345 0.00212 0.00140 0.000970 0.000702
500 0.20807 0.03471 0.01223 0.00578 0.00320 0.00197 0.00130 0.000900 0.000651
600 0.18254 0.03042 0.01071 0.00506 0.00281 0.00172 0.00114 0.000788 0.000570
700 0.16303 0.02715 0.00956 0.00452 0.00250 0.00154 0.00101 0.000703 0.000508
800 0.14760 0.02456 0.00865 0.00408 0.00226 0.00139 0.000915 0.000636 0.000460
900 0.13505 0.02246 0.00790 0.00373 0.00207 0.00127 0.000837 0.000581 0.000420
1000 0.12463 0.02071 0.00729 0.00344 0.00191 0.00117 0.000771 0.000536 0.000387
1500 0.09094 0.01508 0.00530 0.00250 0.00139 0.000851 0.000561 0.000390 0.000282
2000 0.07236 0.01198 0.00421 0.00199 0.00110 0.000676 0.000445 0.000309 0.000224
3000 0.05214 0.00862 0.00303 0.00143 0.000791 0.000486 0.000320 0.000222 0.000161

Table 2.

Helium. Excitation energies E in eV, dipole f values from uncorrelated wave functions (fsc), f values from correlated wave functions (faccu) by Drake [8], and BEf–scaled excitation cross sections σBEf in Å2 as functions of incident electron energy T in eV. The initial state is 1s2 1S. The experimental ionization energy B = 24.5874 eV has been used in the scaling. The constants a, b, and c of Eq. (5) are included

Final state 1s2p 1P 1s3p 1P 1s4p 1P 1s5p 1P 1s6p 1P 1s7p 1P 1s8p 1P 1s9p 1P 1s10p 1P
E 21.218 23.087 23.742 24.046 24.211 24.311 24.375 24.420 24.452
fsc 0.2583 0.07061 0.02899 0.01466 0.00844 0.00529 0.00354 0.00248 0.00181
faccu 0.2762 0.07343 0.02986 0.01504 0.00863 0.00541 0.00361 0.00253 0.00184
Const. a 0.165601 0.041611 0.016111 0.008298 0.004740 0.002963 0.001975 0.001383 0.001006
Const. b −0.076942 −0.018087 −0.007040 −0.003475 −0.001972 −0.001227 −0.000816 −0.000570 −0.000414
Const. c 0.033306 0.002104 −0.000045 −0.000228 −0.000194 −0.000146 −0.000108 −0.000080 −0.000061
T σBEf σBEf σBEf σBEf σBEf σBEf σBEf σBEf σBEf
23 0.01939
24 0.02474 0.00337
25 0.02933 0.00498 0.00159 0.000684 0.000354 0.000206 0.000130 0.0000879 0.0000621
26 0.03343 0.00625 0.00216 0.000997 0.000543 0.000329 0.000214 0.000148 0.000106
27 0.03716 0.00735 0.00264 0.00125 0.000688 0.000421 0.000277 0.000192 0.000139
28 0.04058 0.00832 0.00305 0.00146 0.000812 0.000500 0.000330 0.000229 0.000166
29 0.04375 0.00921 0.00342 0.00165 0.000922 0.000569 0.000376 0.000262 0.000190
30 0.04669 0.01002 0.00376 0.00182 0.00102 0.000631 0.000418 0.000291 0.000211
35 0.05875 0.01329 0.00510 0.00250 0.00141 0.000878 0.000583 0.000407 0.000295
40 0.06757 0.01565 0.00607 0.00299 0.00169 0.00105 0.000700 0.000489 0.000355
45 0.07413 0.01740 0.00678 0.00335 0.00190 0.00118 0.000787 0.000550 0.000399
50 0.07903 0.01871 0.00731 0.00362 0.00206 0.00128 0.000851 0.000595 0.000432
60 0.08542 0.02043 0.00802 0.00397 0.00226 0.00141 0.000937 0.000655 0.000476
70 0.08883 0.02138 0.00841 0.00417 0.00237 0.00148 0.000985 0.000689 0.000501
80 0.09043 0.02185 0.00861 0.00427 0.00243 0.00152 0.00101 0.000706 0.000513
90 0.09088 0.02202 0.00868 0.00431 0.00245 0.00153 0.00102 0.000713 0.000518
100 0.09060 0.02199 0.00868 0.00431 0.00245 0.00153 0.00102 0.000713 0.000518
110 0.08983 0.02184 0.00862 0.00428 0.00244 0.00152 0.00101 0.000709 0.000515
120 0.08876 0.02161 0.00853 0.00424 0.00242 0.00151 0.00100 0.000702 0.000510
130 0.08748 0.02132 0.00842 0.00419 0.00239 0.00149 0.000991 0.000693 0.000504
140 0.08609 0.02100 0.00830 0.00413 0.00235 0.00147 0.000976 0.000683 0.000497
150 0.08462 0.02066 0.00817 0.00406 0.00231 0.00144 0.000961 0.000672 0.000489
160 0.08313 0.02030 0.00803 0.00399 0.00227 0.00142 0.000945 0.000661 0.000481
170 0.08162 0.01995 0.00789 0.00392 0.00224 0.00139 0.000929 0.000650 0.000472
180 0.08012 0.01959 0.00775 0.00385 0.00220 0.00137 0.000912 0.000638 0.000464
190 0.07864 0.01923 0.00761 0.00378 0.00216 0.00135 0.000896 0.000627 0.000456
200 0.07718 0.01888 0.00747 0.00372 0.00212 0.00132 0.000880 0.000616 0.000448
225 0.07370 0.01805 0.00714 0.00355 0.00202 0.00126 0.000841 0.000589 0.000428
250 0.07046 0.01726 0.00683 0.00340 0.00194 0.00121 0.000805 0.000563 0.000410
275 0.06747 0.01654 0.00655 0.00326 0.00186 0.00116 0.000772 0.000540 0.000393
300 0.06471 0.01587 0.00628 0.00313 0.00178 0.00111 0.000740 0.000518 0.000377
350 0.05982 0.01468 0.00581 0.00289 0.00165 0.00103 0.000685 0.000479 0.000349
400 0.05564 0.01365 0.00541 0.00269 0.00153 0.000957 0.000638 0.000446 0.000324
450 0.05203 0.01277 0.00506 0.00252 0.00144 0.000896 0.000597 0.000417 0.000304
500 0.04890 0.01201 0.00476 0.00237 0.00135 0.000842 0.000561 0.000392 0.000285
600 0.04372 0.01074 0.00425 0.00212 0.00121 0.000753 0.000502 0.000351 0.000255
700 0.03962 0.00973 0.00386 0.00192 0.00109 0.000683 0.000455 0.000318 0.000231
800 0.03628 0.00891 0.00353 0.00176 0.00100 0.000625 0.000416 0.000291 0.000212
900 0.03350 0.00823 0.00326 0.00162 0.000925 0.000578 0.000385 0.000269 0.000196
1000 0.03116 0.00766 0.00303 0.00151 0.000861 0.000537 0.000358 0.000250 0.000182
1500 0.02333 0.00573 0.00227 0.00113 0.000645 0.000402 0.000268 0.000187 0.000136
2000 0.01885 0.00463 0.00183 0.000913 0.000521 0.000325 0.000216 0.000151 0.000110
3000 0.01383 0.00340 0.00135 0.000670 0.000382 0.000238 0.000159 0.000111 0.0000807

Table 3.

Lithium. Excitation energies E in eV, dipole f values calculated from uncorrelated wave functions (fsc), f values calculated from correlated wave functions (faccu) as explained in the text, and BEf–scaled excitation cross sections σBEf in Å2 as functions of incident electron energy T in eV. The experimental ionization energy B = 5.3917 eV has been used in the scaling. The constants a, b, and c of Eq. (5) are included

Excitation 2s–2p 2s–3p 2s–4p 2s–5p 2s–6p 2s–7p 2s–8p 2s–9p 2s–10
E 1.848 3.834 4.522 4.837 5.008 5.110 5.177 5.222 5.254
fsc 0.7685 0.00340 0.00353 0.00217 0.00135 0.000880 0.000601 0.000427 0.000314
faccu 0.7468 0.00483 0.00428 0.00260 0.00158 0.00101 0.000683 0.000482 0.000353
Const. a 5.658148 0.012056 0.010631 0.006113 0.003666 0.002342 0.001580 0.001113 0.000813
Const. b 17.288057 0.219978 0.047005 0.018340 0.009244 0.005372 0.003419 0.002319 0.001650
Const. c −0.226058 0.022768 0.011300 0.005517 0.003062 0.001872 0.001229 0.000850 0.000613
T σBEf σBEf σBEf σBEf σBEf σBEf σBEf σBEf σBEf
   2 14.59367
   2.5 27.24288
   3 33.14707
   3.5 36.69134
   4 38.97838 0.53291
   4.5 40.48711 0.87436
   5 41.47440 0.97533 0.15740 0.04132
   5.5 42.09531 1.00527 0.18668 0.06775 0.03110 0.01653 0.00976 0.00622 0.00421
   6 42.45067 1.00592 0.19520 0.07506 0.03657 0.02057 0.01277 0.00851 0.00598
   8 42.33337 0.92889 0.18523 0.07364 0.03691 0.02123 0.01341 0.00905 0.00643
 10 41.07186 0.83871 0.16733 0.06671 0.03351 0.01930 0.01221 0.00825 0.00586
 15 36.87740 0.66670 0.13449 0.05414 0.02736 0.01582 0.01003 0.00679 0.00483
 20 32.98349 0.55296 0.11354 0.04625 0.02354 0.01367 0.00869 0.00589 0.00420
 25 29.73768 0.47298 0.09886 0.04071 0.02085 0.01215 0.00775 0.00526 0.00375
 30 27.06106 0.41366 0.08789 0.03654 0.01881 0.01099 0.00702 0.00478 0.00341
 35 24.83566 0.36787 0.07932 0.03324 0.01719 0.01007 0.00645 0.00439 0.00314
 40 22.96265 0.33143 0.07241 0.03056 0.01586 0.00932 0.00597 0.00407 0.00291
 45 21.36655 0.30171 0.06671 0.02832 0.01475 0.00868 0.00557 0.00380 0.00272
 50 19.99071 0.27700 0.06190 0.02643 0.01380 0.00813 0.00522 0.00357 0.00255
 60 17.73927 0.23823 0.05425 0.02337 0.01226 0.00725 0.00466 0.00319 0.00228
 70 15.97298 0.20918 0.04839 0.02100 0.01106 0.00655 0.00422 0.00289 0.00207
 80 14.54840 0.18657 0.04375 0.01911 0.01009 0.00599 0.00386 0.00264 0.00190
 90 13.37361 0.16847 0.03998 0.01755 0.00930 0.00553 0.00357 0.00244 0.00175
  100 12.38704 0.15364 0.03684 0.01625 0.00863 0.00513 0.00332 0.00227 0.00163
  110 11.54596 0.14126 0.03420 0.01515 0.00806 0.00480 0.00310 0.00213 0.00153
  120 10.81975 0.13076 0.03193 0.01419 0.00756 0.00451 0.00292 0.00200 0.00144
  130 10.18588 0.12175 0.02996 0.01336 0.00713 0.00426 0.00276 0.00189 0.00136
  140 9.62741 0.11393 0.02823 0.01263 0.00675 0.00403 0.00261 0.00179 0.00129
  150 9.13135 0.10707 0.02671 0.01198 0.00641 0.00383 0.00248 0.00170 0.00123
  160 8.68756 0.10101 0.02535 0.01140 0.00611 0.00365 0.00237 0.00163 0.00117
  170 8.28799 0.09561 0.02413 0.01087 0.00583 0.00349 0.00226 0.00155 0.00112
  180 7.92620 0.09077 0.02303 0.01040 0.00558 0.00334 0.00217 0.00149 0.00107
  190 7.59694 0.08641 0.02203 0.00997 0.00536 0.00321 0.00208 0.00143 0.00103
  200 7.29592 0.08246 0.02112 0.00958 0.00515 0.00309 0.00200 0.00138 0.000991
  225 6.64488 0.07403 0.01917 0.00872 0.00470 0.00282 0.00183 0.00126 0.000907
  250 6.10761 0.06719 0.01756 0.00802 0.00433 0.00260 0.00169 0.00116 0.000837
  275 5.65611 0.06153 0.01621 0.00743 0.00402 0.00241 0.00157 0.00108 0.000778
  300 5.27096 0.05677 0.01507 0.00693 0.00375 0.00225 0.00147 0.00101 0.000727
  350 4.64769 0.04920 0.01323 0.00611 0.00331 0.00200 0.00130 0.000894 0.000644
  400 4.16411 0.04344 0.01181 0.00548 0.00298 0.00179 0.00117 0.000805 0.000580
  450 3.77721 0.03892 0.01068 0.00497 0.00270 0.00163 0.00106 0.000732 0.000528
  500 3.46013 0.03526 0.00976 0.00455 0.00248 0.00150 0.000976 0.000673 0.000485
  600 2.97030 0.02972 0.00834 0.00391 0.00213 0.00129 0.000842 0.000580 0.000419
  700 2.60850 0.02570 0.00730 0.00344 0.00188 0.00114 0.000742 0.000512 0.000369
  800 2.32962 0.02267 0.00650 0.00307 0.00168 0.00102 0.000664 0.000458 0.000331
  900 2.10765 0.02028 0.00587 0.00278 0.00152 0.000923 0.000603 0.000416 0.000300
1000 1.92652 0.01836 0.00535 0.00254 0.00139 0.000845 0.000552 0.000381 0.000275
1500 1.36023 0.01251 0.00375 0.00179 0.000988 0.000600 0.000393 0.000271 0.000196
2000 1.06067 0.00953 0.00291 0.00140 0.000773 0.000470 0.000308 0.000213 0.000154
3000 0.74561 0.00649 0.00203 0.000984 0.000545 0.000332 0.000218 0.000151 0.000109

3. Theoretical Results

We present the calculated cross sections for hydrogen, helium, and lithium in Tables 13. Our PWB cross sections were generated from single configuration Dirac-Fock wave functions. The calculated cross sections are compared to other theories and experiments in Figs. 17.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Hydrogen 1s–2p electron–impact excitation cross sections. The solid curve is our scaled plane–wave Born (PWB) result, the filled circles are unscaled PWB cross sections, the open circles are accurate theoretical results from the convergent close coupling (CCC) method shown on the web site of Bray and Ralchenko [6], and the squares are experimental results of Grafe et al. [11].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Hydrogen 1s–3p electron–impact excitation cross sections. The squares are experimental results of Sweeney et al. [7]. The other results are as in Fig. 1.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Hydrogen 1s–4p electron–impact excitation cross sections. The symbols are as in Fig. 2.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Helium 1s2 1S–1s2p 1P electron–impact excitation cross sections. The solid curve is the BEf–scaled plane–wave Born cross section, the open circles are recent CCC results of Merabet et al. [12], and the filled circles are previous CCC results from the web site of Bray and Ralchenko [6]. Experimental results are the recommended values of Trajmar et al. [16] (open squares), Westerveld et al. [14] (triangles), Shemansky et al. [15] (pluses), recommended values of de Heer et al. [13] (crosses), and results of Merabet et al. [12] (diamonds).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Helium 1s2 1S–1s3p 1P electron–impact excitation cross sections. Symbols are the same as in Fig.4.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Helium 1s2 1S–1s4p 1P electron–impact excitation cross sections. Symbols are the same as in Fig.4.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Lithium 1s22s–1s2 2p electron–impact excitation cross sections. The solid curve is the present scaled plane–wave Born (PWB) cross section, the filled circles are unscaled PWB cross section, and the CCC results (open circles) are from Schweinzer et al. [22]. Experimental results are from Leep and Gallagher [18] (open squares), Williams et al. [19] (pluses), and Vuskovic et al. [20] (triangles).

The CCC results for these elements are from the web site of Bray [6]. The experimental results by Sweeney et al. [7] for hydrogen include all dipole-allowed and dipole-forbidden states of hydrogen for each n, and hence are higher than the cross sections for just the dipole-allowed excitations.

The ionization energies B and the excitation energies E are all experimental values. Only BE scaling is needed for hydrogen as its exact wave functions are known. The accurate f values for helium have been obtained from the detailed variational calculations of Drake [8]. The f value for the 2s–2p transition in lithium is from the calculations of Yan et al. [9], while the values for the 2snp transitions, n = 3 through 7, are from the non-relativistic multiconfiguration calculations including core polarization by Qu et al. [10]. For the 2s–8p, 9p, and 10p excitations of lithium, we extrapolated f(n*)3 of Qu et al. [10] from n = 5 through n = 7, where n* is the experimental effective principal quantum number of quantum defect theory. We had found that the f values by Qu et al. for the 8p and 9p transitions were inconsistent with their values for n < 8. The extrapolation of f(n*)3 is shown in Fig. 8 through n* ≈ 17 and is given by the expression:

f(n*)3=0.343+0.0283/(n*)+0.533/(n*)26.289/(n*)3. (6)

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Values of f(n*)3 for lithium showing the extrapolated values for Qu et al. [10] from their data for n = 6 and 7. The f–values given by Qu et al. are anomalous at n = 8 and 9. The extrapolated value at the ionization limit (n* → ∞) is 0.345 (indicated by the arrow on the left hand axis). Also shown are the results from the single configuration Dirac–Fock calculation of the present work (diamonds) and values from the current NIST web site [3] (squares). The NIST web site values are earlier results than the more accurate data of Qu et al.

Beyond n* ≈ 17, the formula begins to break down but the actual curve should remain flat. At the ionization limit (n* → ∞), the value of f(n*)3 is extrapolated to be 0.345.

It is apparent that for all cases where experimental data and CCC results are available, the scaled PWB cross sections give values that are in good agreement.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge partial financial support by the Office of Fusion Energy Sciences of the U.S. Department of Energy.

Biography

About the authors: Philip Stone is a guest researcher and Yong-Ki Kim is a physicist, both in the Atomic Physics Division of the NIST Physics Laboratory. Jean-Paul Desclaux has recently retired from the French Atomic Energy Commission. The National Institute of Standards and Technology is an agency of the Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.

Contributor Information

Philip M. Stone, Email: philip.stone@nist.gov.

Yong-Ki Kim, Email: yong-ki.kim@nist.gov.

4. References

  • 1.Kim Y-K. Phys Rev A. 2001;64:032713. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.See; Vriens L. In: Case Studies in Atomic Physics. McDaniel EW, McDowell MRC, editors. Vol. 1. North Holland; Amsterdam: 1969. p. 335. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.See, for example, NIST’s public web site http://physics.nist.gov (2002).
  • 4.Bray I, Stelbovics AT. Adv At Mol Opt Phys. 1995;35:209. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.See for example; Inokuti M. Rev Mod Phys. 1971;43:297. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.I. Bray and Y. Ralchenko, http://atom.murdoch.edu.au/CCC-WWW/index.html (2002).
  • 7.Sweeney CJ, Grafe A, Shyn TW. Phys Rev A. 2001;64:032704. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Drake GWF. In: Chap. 11 in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics Handbook. Drake GWF, editor. AIP; Woodbury, NY: 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yan ZC, Tambasco M, Drake GWF. Phys Rev A. 1998;57:1652. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Qu L, Wang Z, Li B. Eur Phys J D. 1999;5:173. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Grafe A, Sweeney CJ, Shyn TW. Phys Rev A. 2001;63:052715. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Merabet H, Bailey M, Bruch R, Hanni J, Bliman S, Fursa DV, Bray I, Bartschat K, Tang HC, Lin CD. Phys Rev A. 2001;64:012712. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.de Heer FJ. International Nuclear Data Committee Report IDC(NDS)-385. Vienna, Austria: 1998. Unpublished—Recommended values. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Westerveld WB, Heideman HGM, van Eck J. J Phys B. 1979;12:115. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shemansky DE, Ajello JM, Hall DT, Franklin B. Astrophy J. 1985;296:774. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Trajmar S, Ratliff JM, Csanak G, Cartwright DC. Z Phys D. 1992;22:457. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cartwright DC, Csanak G, Trajmar S, Register DF. Phys Rev A. 1992;45:1602. doi: 10.1103/physreva.45.1602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Leep D, Gallagher A. Phys Rev A. 1974;10:1082. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Williams W, Trajmar S, Bozinis D. J Phys B. 1976;9:1529. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vuskovic L, Trajmar S, Register DF. J Phys B. 1982;15:2517. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bray I, Fursa D, McCarthy IE. Phys Rev A. 1993;47:1101. doi: 10.1103/physreva.47.1101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schweinzer J, Brandenburg R, Bray I, Hoekstra R, Aumayer F, Janev RK, Winter HP. At Data Nucl Data Tables. 1999;72:239. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Standards and Technology

RESOURCES