Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 1995 Aug;59(2):127–131. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.59.2.127

Recurrent stroke after transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke: does the distinction between small and large vessel disease remain true to type? Dutch TIA Trial Study Group.

L J Kappelle 1, J C van Latum 1, J C van Swieten 1, A Algra 1, P J Koudstaal 1, J van Gijn 1
PMCID: PMC485986  PMID: 7629525

Abstract

The incidence and vascular type of recurrent ischaemic stroke was studied in patients with supratentorial transient ischaemic attacks or non-disabling ischaemic strokes, who were treated with aspirin (30 or 283 mg). Patients were divided into groups with small vessel disease (SVD) (n = 1216) or large vessel disease (LVD) (n = 1221) on the grounds of their clinical features and CT at baseline. Patients with evidence of both SVD and LVD (n = 180) were excluded from further analyses. During follow up (mean 2.6 years) annual stroke rate was 3.6% in both groups. Of the 107 patients with SVD at baseline who had recurrent strokes, 83 proved to have an identifiable infarct: 30 (28%) again had a small vessel infarct, 39 (36%) had a large vessel ischaemic stroke and in 14 (13%) the recurrent ischaemic stroke was in the posterior fossa. Of the 110 patients with LVD at baseline and recurrent stroke, 91 had an identifiable infarct: 67 (61%) again had a large vessel ischaemic stroke, 16 (15%) had a small vessel ischaemic stroke, and eight (7%) had the recurrent ischaemic stroke in the posterior fossa. Thus patients with a transient ischaemic attack or non-disabling ischaemic stroke caused by LVD were more likely to have an ischaemic stroke of the same vessel type during follow up than patients with SVD (relative risk 2.2; 95% confidence interval 1.5-3.4). Possible explanations for this difference are: (1) patients with a small vessel ischaemic stroke at baseline had both SVD and LVD or were misdiagnosed; (2) recurrent small vessel ischaemic stroke may have occurred more often than reported, because they were silent or only minimally disabling; (3) recurring large vessel ischaemic strokes occurring in patients initially diagnosed as having SVD might have been related to potential cardiac sources of emboli that had not been previously recognized; (4) the antiplatelet drug aspirin (30 or 283 mg) prescribed in this patient group may have prevented thrombosis in small vessels better than in large vessels.

Full text

PDF
127

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bamford J. M., Sandercock P. A., Warlow C. P., Slattery J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1989 Jun;20(6):828–828. doi: 10.1161/01.str.20.6.828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bamford J. M., Warlow C. P. Evolution and testing of the lacunar hypothesis. Stroke. 1988 Sep;19(9):1074–1082. doi: 10.1161/01.str.19.9.1074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bamford J., Sandercock P., Dennis M., Burn J., Warlow C. Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet. 1991 Jun 22;337(8756):1521–1526. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)93206-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bamford J., Sandercock P., Jones L., Warlow C. The natural history of lacunar infarction: the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project. Stroke. 1987 May-Jun;18(3):545–551. doi: 10.1161/01.str.18.3.545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bogousslavsky J., Van Melle G., Regli F. The Lausanne Stroke Registry: analysis of 1,000 consecutive patients with first stroke. Stroke. 1988 Sep;19(9):1083–1092. doi: 10.1161/01.str.19.9.1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Caplan L. R. Intracranial branch atheromatous disease: a neglected, understudied, and underused concept. Neurology. 1989 Sep;39(9):1246–1250. doi: 10.1212/wnl.39.9.1246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chamorro A., Sacco R. L., Mohr J. P., Foulkes M. A., Kase C. S., Tatemichi T. K., Wolf P. A., Price T. R., Hier D. B. Clinical-computed tomographic correlations of lacunar infarction in the Stroke Data Bank. Stroke. 1991 Feb;22(2):175–181. doi: 10.1161/01.str.22.2.175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chimowitz M. I., Furlan A. J., Nayak S., Sila C. A. Mechanism of stroke in patients taking aspirin. Neurology. 1990 Nov;40(11):1682–1685. doi: 10.1212/wnl.40.11.1682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Clavier I., Hommel M., Besson G., Noèlle B., Perret J. E. Long-term prognosis of symptomatic lacunar infarcts. A hospital-based study. Stroke. 1994 Oct;25(10):2005–2009. doi: 10.1161/01.str.25.10.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fieschi C., Argentino C., Lenzi G. L., Sacchetti M. L., Toni D., Bozzao L. Clinical and instrumental evaluation of patients with ischemic stroke within the first six hours. J Neurol Sci. 1989 Jul;91(3):311–321. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(89)90060-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fisher C. M. Capsular infarcts: the underlying vascular lesions. Arch Neurol. 1979 Feb;36(2):65–73. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1979.00500380035003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hankey G. J., Warlow C. P. Lacunar transient ischaemic attacks: a clinically useful concept? Lancet. 1991 Feb 9;337(8737):335–338. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90953-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hier D. B., Foulkes M. A., Swiontoniowski M., Sacco R. L., Gorelick P. B., Mohr J. P., Price T. R., Wolf P. A. Stroke recurrence within 2 years after ischemic infarction. Stroke. 1991 Feb;22(2):155–161. doi: 10.1161/01.str.22.2.155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kappelle L. J., Koudstaal P. J., van Gijn J., Ramos L. M., Keunen J. E. Carotid angiography in patients with lacunar infarction. A prospective study. Stroke. 1988 Sep;19(9):1093–1096. doi: 10.1161/01.str.19.9.1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kappelle L. J., Ramos L. M., van Gijn J. The role of computed tomography in patients with lacunar stroke in the carotid territory. Neuroradiology. 1989;31(4):316–319. doi: 10.1007/BF00344174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kappelle L. J., van Latum J. C., Koudstaal P. J., van Gijn J. Transient ischaemic attacks and small-vessel disease. Dutch TIA Study Group. Lancet. 1991 Feb 9;337(8737):339–341. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90955-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Koudstaal P. J., van Gijn J., Staal A., Duivenvoorden H. J., Gerritsma J. G., Kraaijeveld C. L. Diagnosis of transient ischemic attacks: improvement of interobserver agreement by a check-list in ordinary language. Stroke. 1986 Jul-Aug;17(4):723–728. doi: 10.1161/01.str.17.4.723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lodder J., Bamford J. M., Sandercock P. A., Jones L. N., Warlow C. P. Are hypertension or cardiac embolism likely causes of lacunar infarction? Stroke. 1990 Mar;21(3):375–381. doi: 10.1161/01.str.21.3.375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nadeau S. E., Jordan J. E., Mishra S. K., Haerer A. F. Stroke rates in patients with lacunar and large vessel cerebral infarctions. J Neurol Sci. 1993 Feb;114(2):128–137. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(93)90287-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Norrving B., Cronqvist S. Clinical and radiologic features of lacunar versus nonlacunar minor stroke. Stroke. 1989 Jan;20(1):59–64. doi: 10.1161/01.str.20.1.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sacco S. E., Whisnant J. P., Broderick J. P., Phillips S. J., O'Fallon W. M. Epidemiological characteristics of lacunar infarcts in a population. Stroke. 1991 Oct;22(10):1236–1241. doi: 10.1161/01.str.22.10.1236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES