Abstract
Introduction
Arsenic-72 (72As; 2.49 MeV β+, 26 h) and 77As (0.683 MeV β−, 38.8 h) have nuclear properties useful for positron emission tomography (PET) and radiotherapy applications, respectively. Their half-lives are sufficiently long for targeting tumors with antibodies, as well as peptides. Potential radiopharmaceuticals based on radioarsenic require development of suitable bifunctional chelates for stable conjugation of arsenic to vectors under in vivo conditions at high dilution.
Methods
The thiophilic nature of arsenic led to the synthesis and characterization of a simple trithiol ligand and its arsenic complex, and radiolabeling studies at the no carrier added (NCA) 77 As level.
Results
1H- and 13C-NMR spectroscopy, electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), and single crystal X-ray diffraction were used to characterize the trithiol ligand and its arsenic(III) complex. Radiotracer studies with no carrier added (NCA) 77As resulted in high radiolabeling yields (>96%) with high in vitro stability.
Conclusions
The high yield and stability of a single NCA 77As trithiol complex indicates this framework is suitable for developing matched pair agents for non-invasive in vivo PET imaging and radiotherapy of tumors with 72,77As. This is the first reported chelate developed for NCA radioarsenic and studies are underway for developing a trithiol bifunctional chelate conjugated to a targeting vector, such as a peptide or monoclonal antibody.
Keywords: trithiol ligand, arsenic trithiol, no carrier added 77As, radiolabeling, crystal structures
Introduction
Diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy using radiolabeled drugs (radiopharmaceuticals) often involve radiometals such as 99mTc and 90Y, or non-metals such as 18F and 131I. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) has become an important nuclear medicine imaging technique, especially since the approval of 2-deoxy-(18F)-fluoroglucose (18F-FDG) for imaging metabolism. With the exception of 89Zr (3.27 d) and 124I (4.18 d), the more commonly used positron emitters (11C, 18F, 64Cu) are too short-lived for use in radioimmunoimaging with radiolabeled antibodies, which often take days to localize and clear from non-target tissues [1]. Two radioisotopes of arsenic, 72As and 77As, have nuclear properties that would make them a true “matched pair” for diagnostic and therapeutic nuclear medicine (Table 1) and potentially useful for radioimmunoimaging and radioimmunotherapy.
Table 1.
Isotope | Half-life (h) | Decay Mode (%) | Eβmax (MeV) | Eγ in keV (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
72As | 26.0 | EC (12), β+ (88) | 2.49 | 511 (176), 834 (81) |
77As | 38.8 | β− (100) | 0.683 | 239 (1.65) |
Arsenic-72 is a 26 h positron emitter for which development of a 72Se/72As generator has been reported, potentially leading to portable availability of this PET radionuclide [2–6]. Arsenic-77 is a 38.8 h beta emitter that is reactor produced through neutron irradiation of enriched 76GeO2 followed by beta decay of 77Ge (11.3 h). The production of radioarsenic using various targets and irradiation methods (proton, neutron, alpha, 3He) have been described, as have separation methods for radioarsenic including distillation, chromatography, solvent extraction and precipitation, with most methods yielding radioarsenic in the +3 oxidation state [7–13]. At no carrier added (NCA) levels, As(III) readily oxidizes to As(V) within minutes, and thus development of methodologies to reduce As(V) and utilize NCA radioarsenic as As(III) for radiosyntheses were developed.
The utilization of the water soluble dithiolates, British Anti-Lewisite (BAL), 2,3-mercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA), and 2,3-dimercaptopropanesulfonate (DMPS), for chelation therapy for the treatment of arsenic poisoning is well known [15]. However, few, if any, chelators specific for stabilizing NCA radioarsenic for radiopharmaceutical applications have been reported [15]. The thiophilic nature of arsenic to directly label the targeting moiety of interest has been reported for radiolabeling HMPA (N-(2-hydroxypropyl)-methacrylamide) based polymers via free sulfhydryl groups for potential PET imaging, and peptides containing 1 to 4 cysteines to assess the binding affinity of arsenic for thiol containing peptides [16,17]. Only one report by Jennewein et al. used NCA radioarsenic to investigate the in vivo localization of N-succinimidyl S-acetylthioacetate (SATA) derivatized Bavituximab ch3G4 (a chimeric IgG3 monoclonal antibody) and Rituximab in prostate tumor bearing rats [18,19].
This study reports the development of a trithiol chelate and its As(III) complex for potential in vivo applications at the no carrier added (NCA) radiotracer level. A trithiol chelate and its arsenic complex were synthesized and fully characterized by 1H- and 13C-NMR, ESI-MS, elemental analysis, and X-ray crystallography. Radiolabeling with NCA 77As was optimized and the bicyclic [77As]arsenic trithiol complex was shown to be stable in vitro at room temperature over several days.
Experimental
Materials
CAUTION! Arsenic is highly toxic and should be handled with care. Arsenic trioxide, 1,1,1-tris(hydroxymethyl)propane, mercaptoacetic acid, anhydrous dimethylformamide, pyridine, lithium aluminum hydride, potassium hydroxide, p-toluene sulfonyl chloride, ammonium chloride, and potassium thiocyanate were purchased from commercial sources and used as received. Silica gel 60Å (Acros Organics), TWEEN® 80 (Sigma Aldrich-St. Louis, MO), silica gel 60Å (Fisher Scientific-Pittsburgh, PA), silica gel TLC plates (SelectoScientific-Suwanee, GA), and 13 mm 0.2 μm Nylon Whatman filter discs (GE Healthcare Life Sciences- Pittsburgh, PA) were used as supplied. All solvents, acids and bases were reagent grade and used without further purification. Only 18 MΩ water was used.
CAUTION! 77As and 77Ge are radioactive and must be handled in laboratories outfitted and approved for work with radioactive materials. Arsenic-77 was prepared by neutron irradiation of 96.2% or 98.6% enriched 76GeO2 (Trace Sciences International, Richmond Hill, ON, Canada) in a thermal neutron flux of 2.4 x 1014 n/cm2-s at the University of Missouri Research Reactor Center (MURR). Arsenic-77: 38.9 h, 0.225 MeV β−avg, 239 keV γ (1.65%); 77Ge: 11.3 h, 1.18 MeV β−avg, several γ (211 keV (30%), 215.6 keV (27.9%), and 264.5 keV (53.3%).
Physical Measurements
1H- and 13C-NMR spectra were obtained in CDCl3 on a Bruker ARX-500 MHz spectrometer using TMS as an internal standard. Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectra (ESI-MS) were obtained on a Thermo Finnigan TSQ7000 triple-quadrupole instrument with an API2 source. Elemental analyses were performed by Atlantic Microlab, Inc. (Norcross, GA). An ORTEC HPGe detector outfitted with Genie multichannel analysis software was used to assay 77Ge and 77As liquid samples. Reversed phase HPLC (RP-HPLC) was performed using a Shimadzu Prominence HPLC system equipped with a pump, controller, Prominence UV-Vis detector (model SPD20-AV) set to 254 nm and coupled to a Beckman 170 NaI(Tl) radioisotope detector. An Eckert & Ziegler Bioscan AR-2000 Imager using LabLogic Win-Scan imaging scanner software (Version 2.2(11)) was used for scanning radioTLC plates. The gradient system for RP-HPLC using a Thermo Scientific BetaBasic 18 (5 μm, 150 mm x 4.6 mm) column was as follows: 3 minutes at 60/40 ACN/H2O w/ 0.1 % TFA, followed by a linear gradient to 75/25 over 7 min, and to 95/5 over 10 min, all at a flow rate of 1 mL/min.
X-ray Crystal Structures
Intensity data for compounds 3 and 5 were obtained at −173 °C on a Bruker SMART CCD Area Detector system using the ω scan technique with Mo Kα radiation from a graphite monochromator. Intensities were corrected for Lorentz and polarization effects. Equivalent reflections were merged, and absorption corrections were made using the multi-scan method. The structures were solved by direct methods with full-matrix least-squares refinement, using the SHELX package [20]. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic thermal parameters. The hydrogen atoms were placed at calculated positions and included in the refinement using a riding model, with fixed isotropic U. Data were corrected for decay and absorption using the program SADABS [21]. The final difference maps contained no features of chemical significance.
Syntheses
2-Ethyl-2-((tosyloxy)methyl)propane-1,3-diyl bis(4-methylbenzenesulfonate) [C27H32O9S3], 2 [22]
1,1,1-Tris(hydroxymethyl)propane (1; 10.01 g, 74.6 mmol) was added to a stirring solution of pyridine (82.5 mL) at −5 °C. p-Toluenesulfonyl chloride (71.04 g, 372.6 mmol) was then slowly added. After 2 h the reaction was allowed to slowly come to room temperature and stirred vigorously for approximately 2 days. The reaction progress was followed by silica gel TLC with dichloromethane (DCM) as the mobile phase and visualized using UV, iodine, and KMnO4 (ditosylate, Rf ≈ 0.2; 2, Rf ≈ 0.55; p-toluenesulfonyl chloride, Rf ≈ 0.95). The reaction was poured into cold 2 M HCl (600 mL) to precipitate the crude product. The precipitate was washed with several portions (~3 x 100 mL) of 2 M HCl, followed by dissolution in ethyl acetate (EtOAc) (200 mL), which was washed with 2 M HCl (1 x 50 mL), saturated sodium bicarbonate (3 x 100 mL), and brine (1 x 50 mL). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and taken to dryness under vacuum to give the product as a white solid. Yield: 42.94 g, 96.5%. 1H NMR (CDCl3; 500 MHz) δ ppm: 0.64 (t, 3H, CH3), 1.35 (q, 2H, CCH2), 2.46 (s, 9H, ArCH3), 3.77 (s, 6H, OCH2), 7.36 (d, 6H, ArH), 7.71 (d, 6H, ArH). 13C NMR (CDCl3 d6; 125.8 MHz) δ ppm: 6.71 (CH3), 21.72 (ArCH3), 21.85 (CCH2), 42.05 (C), 67.81 (OCH2), 128.10 (ArC), 130.23 (ArC), 132.00 (ArC),) 145.52 (ArC). ESI-MS (m/z) 619.30 (619.08 calcd for [M+Na]+ of [C27H32O9S3]). Elemental Anal. calc’d (found) for C27H32O9S3: C, 54.35 (54.40): H, 5.41 (5.47); S, 16.02 (16.12).
1-Thiocyanato-2,2-bis(thiocyanatomethyl)butane [C9H11N3S3], 3 [22]
Intermediate 2 (10.0 g, 16.8 mmol) and KSCN (21.2 g, 218 mmol) were added to dry DMF (50 mL) while vigorously stirring. The reaction mixture was heated to 110 °C for 13 h, followed by 4 h at 120 °C, during which time solids formed and the reaction mixture turned dark brown. The reaction was monitored by silica gel TLC with DCM as the mobile phase, and visualized using UV, iodine, and KMnO4 (3; Rf ≈ 0.4). The reaction mixture was poured over crushed ice water (600 mL) and left in the freezer overnight (−13 °C) to precipitate the crude product 3 (1-thiocyanato-2,2-bis(thiocyanatomethyl)butane), the trithiocyanate species, CH3CH2C(CH2SCN)3. The brown precipitate was isolated by vacuum filtration, washed with deionized water, dissolved in EtOAc (200 mL), and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The solvent was removed by vacuum distillation to give brown oily crystalline product. Pure product was obtained by recrystallization from ethyl ether to yield 3 as a light yellow crystalline solid. X-ray quality crystals were grown by slow evaporation from chloroform. Yield: 2.6 g, 60%. 1H NMR (CDCl3; 500 MHz) δ ppm: 1.01 (t, 3H, CH3), 1.79 (q, 2H, CH2), 3.25 (s, 6H, SCH2). 13C NMR (CDCl3; 125.8 MHz) δ ppm: 7.85 (CH3), 26.93(CCH2), 38.50 (SCH2), 44.78 (C), 111.18 (SCN). ESI-MS (m/z) 280.0 (280.08 calcd for [M+Na]+ of [C9H11N3S3]). Elemental Anal. calc’d (found) for C9H11N3S3: C, 42.00 (42.78); H, 4.31 (4.47); N, 16.33 (15.61); S, 37.37 (36.95).
2-Ethyl-2-(mercaptomethyl)propane-1,3-dithiol [C6H14S3], 4 [22]
Compound 3 was converted to the trithiol by reduction with lithium aluminum hydride. Under N2, compound 3 (1.0 g, 3.9 mmol) and LiAlH4 (0.89 g, 23 mmol) were added to a 50 mL three necked round bottom flask and cold ethyl ether (30 mL) was added by syringe after the reaction was cooled to −5 °C. The reaction was vigorously stirred at −5 °C for 3 h and then brought to room temperature and stirred overnight, during which time grey solids formed. The reaction was quenched by addition of saturated ammonium chloride (20 mL). Solids were removed by vacuum filtration, and 2 M HCl (20 mL) was added to the mother liquor, which was extracted with ethyl ether (3 x 50 mL). The organic layers were combined, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and taken to dryness to yield a light yellow oil, which crystallized upon cooling. Yield: 584 mg, 82%. 1H NMR (CDCl3; 500 MHz) δ ppm: 0.82 (t, 3H, CH3), 1.18 (t, 3H, SH), 1.46 (q, 2H, CCH2), 2.58 (d, 6H, SCH2). 13C NMR (CDCl3; 125.8 MHz) δ ppm: 7.85 (CH3), 25.10 (CCH2), 28.80 (SCH2), 41.66 (C). ESI-MS (m/z) 181.12 (181.03 calcd for [M-H]− of [C6H14S3]).
4-Ethyl-2,6,7-trithia-1-arsabicyclo[2.2.2]octane [C6H11S3As], 5
Arsenic trioxide (0.101 g, 0.506 mmol) was dissolved in ethanol (95%, 20 mL) and ammonium mercaptoacetate (827.2 μL of 5.5 M aqueous solution, 4.55 mmol) was added while heating to 50 °C with stirring. After 60 min 4 (0.184 g, 1.01 mmol) was added and stirring continued for 20 min. The reaction mixture was cooled to −13 °C, and then filtered to remove insoluble material. The filtrate was taken to dryness to yield an off-white precipitate, which was washed with deionized water (2 x 15 mL), dissolved in dichloromethane (10 mL), dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, filtered, and taken to dryness to yield light yellow crystals. X-ray quality crystals were grown by slow evaporation from chloroform. Yield: 0.135 g, 50.3%. 1H NMR (CDCl3; 500 MHz) δ ppm: 0.89 (t, 3H, CH3), 1.39 (q, 2H, CH2) 2.94 (s, 6H, SCH2). 13C NMR (CDCl3 d6; 125.8 MHz) δ ppm: 8.17 (CH3), 31.29 (C), 31.65 (SCH2), 37.39 (CCH2). ESI-MS (m/z) 254.69 (254.93 calcd for [M+H]+ of [C6H11S3As]). Elemental Anal. calc’d (found) for C6H11S3As: C, 28.34 (31.42): H, 4.36 (4.70). Note, 1H-NMR shows residual high vacuum grease at 1.45 ppm. RP-HPLC: tr = 9.75 min (UV detection).
Radiotracer synthesis of no-carrier added 77As-(4-ethyl-2,6,7-trithia-1-arsabicyclo[2.2.2]octane), [77As]5
No carrier added (NCA) 77As, as arsenate in methanol, was obtained from MURR. The solvent was removed by gentle heating (50 °C) under air flow, and the [77As]arsenate (typically 111–185 MBq (3–5 mCi)) was taken up in 1.0 mL of H2O yielding a stock solution of 0.111–0.185 MBq/μL (3–5 μCi/μL). The synthesis of [77As]5 was carried out by combining aqueous ammonium mercaptoacetate (500 mM), absolute EtOH, and 4 in absolute EtOH (55 mM) in a vial, adding [77As]arsenate stock solution, capping and heating in a water bath. The total volume of the reaction was set at 500 μL and a solvent mixture of 90/10 EtOH/H2O. The ammonium mercaptoacetate (10–25 mM final concentration), [4] (1 μM–1 mM final concentration), temperature (30–70 °C) and time (10–60 min) were varied to optimize the radiolabeling yield. The radiolabeling yields were determined by silica gel TLC with ethyl ether as the mobile phase. The product, [77As]5, migrated with an Rf of 0.88 while all other species ([77As](mercaptoacetate)3, [77As]arsenate/arsenite) remained at the origin. Optimal reaction conditions were with the monothiol (ammonium mercaptoacetate) concentration at 25 mM, the trithiol concentration, (4) at 15 μM, and the temperature at 60 °C for 30 min. RP-HPLC: tr = 9.88 min (γ detection).
Results and Discussion
An underlying theme of nuclear medicine is the radiotracer principle, developed by Georg de Hevesy, which uses very low concentrations (often μM or less depending on half-life) of the radiolabeled molecule (radiopharmaceutical). Radioactivity is easily detected at very low levels and thus attaching a radiolabel to a molecule allows for imaging and/or treatment of disease at concentrations (μM to nM or lower) that will not perturb the system. This avoids toxicological effects that may be observed at macroscopic levels often found in pharmaceuticals. No carrier added (NCA) 72As and 77As are two radioisotopes of arsenic that would yield “matched pair” diagnostic and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals if the chemistry to incorporate them into physiologically stable molecules is developed. A trithiol, 4, was synthesized to evaluate its utility in stabilizing NCA 77As(III) on complexation.
Trithiol and Arsenic Trithiol Syntheses
Using a modified literature procedure, 2-ethyl-2-(mercaptomethyl)propane-1,3-dithiol, 4, was prepared in an overall yield of 48 % (Scheme 1) [22].
2-Ethyl-2-((tosyloxy)methyl)propane-1,3-diyl bis(4-methylbenzenesulfonate), 2, was synthesized by reaction of 1,1,1-tris(hydroxymethyl)propane, 1, with excess p-toluene sulfonyl chloride in pyridine. Reaction of the tritosylate with excess potassium thiocyanate in dry DMF generated 1-thiocyanato-2,2-bis(thiocyanatomethyl)butane, 3. Prolonged heating at high temperature yielded unsatisfactory material and complicated the purification process. Reduction of compound 3 with lithium aluminum hydride in diethyl ether yielded 2-ethyl-2-(mercaptomethyl)propane-1,3-dithiol, 4. All intermediates and the final trithiol were purified using solvent extraction, recrystallization, and/or silica gel column chromatography. The bicycloarsenic (III) compound, 5, precipitated on reaction of arsenic trioxide with the trithiol, 4, in the presence of ammonium mercaptoacetate to facilitate the dissolution of As2O3 in ethanol. The final yield, following purification by solvent extraction, was 50.3%.
All compounds, 2–5, were characterized by elemental analysis, 1H- and 13C-NMR spectroscopy, and ESI-MS. The molecular ions for all compounds were observed in the ESI-MS spectra at the calculated m/z values. The 1H-NMR spectrum of the arsenic trithiol compound, 5, showed the disappearance of the –SH protons, a downfield shift of the methylene protons alpha to the coordinated S (SCH2) and the methyl protons (CH3) but an upfield shift in the methylene protons (CCH2CH3) of the bridgehead ethyl group relative to the free trithiol (Table 2). The 13C-NMR spectrum of 5 showed downfield shifts for all but the bridgehead carbon, which was shifted upfield by 10 ppm (Table 2).
Table 2.
4 | 5 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
proton | ρ (ppm) | carbon | ρ (ppm) | proton | ρ (ppm) | carbon | ρ (ppm) |
CH3 | 0.82 | CH3 | 7.85 | CH3 | 0.89 | CH3 | 8.17 |
SH | 1.18 | CCH2 | 25.10 | CCH2 | 37.39 | ||
CCH2 | 1.46 | SCH2 | 28.80 | CCH2 | 1.39 | SCH2 | 31.65 |
SCH2 | 2.58 | C | 41.66 | SCH2 | 2.94 | C | 31.29 |
Single Crystal X-ray Structures
Compounds 3 and 5 were characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. Crystal refinement data, bond angles and distances are summarized in Tables 3 and 4. Figure 1 shows the ORTEP structure of 3 with its three thiocyanate protecting groups. Bond distances and angles for compound 3 were in good agreement with previously reported organic thiocyanates [23–25]. The average C-N distance of 1.1464 Å calculated for C(7)-N(1), C(8)-N(3), and C(9)-N(3) for 3 was within the range (1.139(2) – 1.194(1) Å) previously reported for similar compounds [23–25]. The average S-CN bond distance of 1.695 Å for S(1)-C(7), S(2)-C(8), and S(3)-C(9) is slightly longer than previously reported distances of 1.63(1) Å to 1.693(2) Å [23–25]. The average H2C-SCN bond distance of 1.831 Å for S(1)-C(4), S(2)-C(5), and S(3)-C(6), are slightly longer than previously reported (1.808(6) Å) [23–25]. The SCN angles observed lie within the range previously reported for organic thiocyanates of 172.3(1)° to 197.7(3)° [23–25].
Table 3.
Trithiocyanate (3) | Arsenic Trithiol (5) | |
---|---|---|
CCDC # | 1413544 | 1413545 |
Formula | C9H11N3S3 | C6H11AsS3 |
F.W. | 257.39 | 254.27 |
Crystal System | Orthorhombic | Monoclinic |
Space Group | P n a 21 | P 21/c |
a (Å) | 17.766(5) | 11.153(3) |
b (Å) | 9.957(3) | 11.486(3) |
c (Å) | 6.913(2) | 7.2810(2) |
α (°) | 90.00 | 90.00 |
β (°) | 90.00 | 100.610(3) |
γ (°) | 90.00 | 90.00 |
V (Å3) | 1222.8(6) | 916.8(4) |
Z | 4.00 | 6.00 |
rcalc, g/cm3 | 1.40 | 1.86 |
T, K | 173(2) | 173(2) |
μ, mm−1 | 0.58 | 4.10 |
λ source (Å) | 0.71 | 0.71 |
R(F) | 0.02 | 0.02 |
Rw(F)2 | 0.06 | 0.05 |
GoF | 1.07 | 1.03 |
R = (Σ||FO| - |FC||/Σ|FO||). RW = [Σϖ(|FO2| - |FC2|)2/Σϖ(|FO2|2]1/2.
Table 4.
Trithiocyanate (3) | Arsenic Trithiol (5) | ||
---|---|---|---|
S(1)-C(4) | 1.8317(2) | As(1)-S(1) | 2.2364(8) |
S(1)-C(7) | 1.6932(2) | As(1)-S(2) | 2.2379(8) |
S(2)-C(5) | 1.8332(1) | As(1)-S(3) | 2.2348(7) |
S(2)-C(8) | 1.6977(2) | ||
S(3)-C(6) | 1.8289(1) | ||
S(3)-C(9) | 1.6935(2) | ||
N(1)-C(7) | 1.1468(2) | ||
N(2)-C(8) | 1.147(2) | ||
N(3)-C(9) | 1.145(2) | ||
N(1)-C(7)-S(1) | 179.19(2) | S(1)-As(1)-S(2) | 97.00(2) |
N(2)-C(8)-S(2) | 177.80(1) | S(3)-As(1)-S(1) | 96.79(2) |
N(3)-C(9)-S(3) | 175.87(2) | S(3)-As(1)-S(2) | 96.82(3) |
The arsenic center in 5 exhibits the expected trigonal pyramidal geometry on coordination to trithiol 4 (Figure 2). The As-S bond distances observed (2.2348(7) Å to 2.2379(8) Å) fall in the middle of the range (2.2083(6) to 2.2660(10)) of previously reported dithioarsine compounds (i.e., aryl-AsS2 and X-AsS2) containing 6-membered dithiolates [26–28]. The S-As-S bond angles observed fall at the low end of comparable arsine compounds previously reported (97.27(2)° to 102.20(5)°), likely due to the constraints of bicyclic ring formation on coordination to As(III) [26–28]. To our knowledge, this is the first structurally characterized monomeric bicyclic trithiaarsine reported.
No Carrier Added 77As Radiochemistry
The no carrier added (NCA) concentrations of [77As]arsenate, the starting material for the radiotracer experiments, are in the nM and lower range. To ensure that the reaction kinetics are sufficient, all other reactants are in large excess compared to the radionuclide concentration. Therefore minimizing the concentrations of the reactants and ensuring sufficiently fast kinetics for the radiolabeling reaction must be balanced. Of particular importance is minimizing the ligand (trithiol in this case) concentration when biological targeting molecules such as peptides and monoclonal antibodies are incorporated, which is the ultimate use of the ligand, since radiolabeled and unlabeled bioconjugate compete for available receptor sites.
The 77As was available in oxidation state +5, as arsenate, so the first step in the radiosynthesis involved reduction to the +3 oxidation state. Ammonium mercaptoacetate (NH4SR) was used as the monothiol to reduce the [77As]arsenate to [77As](SR)3 followed by reaction with trithiol 4 to form [77As]5. Optimization included varying the ammonium mercaptoacetate and trithiol, 4, concentrations, temperature, and time to achieve high radiolabeling yields under the mildest conditions. The optimization reactions were followed by silica gel radioTLC and contained both monothiol and trithiol. Using monothiol only, the [77As](SR)3 was observed to oxidize on the TLC plate and streak from the origin toward the solvent front with methanol as the mobile phase. Using trithiol alone for reduction and subsequent complexation did not yield product. Addition of both the monothiol and trithiol at the beginning of the reaction resulted in formation of [77As]5. No oxidation/decomposition was observed during radioTLC analysis. Any unreacted arsenic remained at the origin and the product [77As]5 migrated to the solvent front with ethyl ether. RP-HPLC was used to verify product formation by comparison to the macroscopic standard with retention times of 9.75 min and 9.88 min for the macroscopic and NCA complexes, respectively, by UV and radiodetection (Figure 3).
Optimization reactions were run in 90/10 ethanol/water to ensure trithiol solubility. The monothiol concentration (1–40 mM), trithiol concentration ([4], 1 μM – 5 mM), time, and temperature (30–70 °C) were optimized iteratively (each individually and then again to fine tune). Figure 4 shows that a trithiol, [4], concentration of 10 μM or higher results in greater than ≥90% radiochemical yield of [77As]5. Figure 5 shows that monothiol concentrations of 10 mM or higher result in greater than 90% radiochemical yield of [77As]5. Figure 6 shows the radiochemical yield of [77As]5 as a function of temperature after 30 min at 10 μM 4 and 15 mM monothiol. Longer reaction times at lower temperatures or higher temperatures for shorter times resulted in 90% radiochemical yield of [77As]5. Overall, the reaction is limited by the rate at which the arsenic is reduced. Therefore, better labeling yields were observed at lower temperatures (30–40 °C) if the arsenic had been previously reduced with the monothiol at high temperature (60–70 °C), and subsequently cooled to 30–40 °C before reaction with the trithiol. A balance between the length of reaction time and quantity of reagents (reducing agent, trithiol chelator, and solvents) depends upon the application, which in this case was minimizing the reaction time necessary (20–30 min) to achieve high radiolabeling yield. The optimal reaction conditions resulting in >90% radiochemical yield of [77As]5 were determined to be with a monothiol concentration of 25 mM, a trithiol, 4, concentration of 15 μM, and a temperature of 60 °C for 30 min.
In Vitro Stability
The [77As]5 was observed to be stable in the reaction medium for several days as determined by periodic radioTLC. No decrease in yield was observed from 90% over a week. The reaction medium contains about a 550-fold excess of monothiol (mercaptoacetate) to trithiol suggesting the complex should be stable to challenge by thiols present in vivo (e.g., glutathione, cysteine). Stability studies of purified [77As]5 have not been performed in saline or to cysteine challenge since it has proven difficult to isolate this particular trithiol, 4, from the product. Studies are underway to derivatize the trithiol for conjugation to antibodies and peptides, which will result in aqueous solubility and allow for separation. Previous reports on direct radiolabeling of thiol modified mAbs and nanoparticles with NCA radioarsenic have demonstrated high stability [16,18,19].
Conclusion
The thiophilic nature of arsenic led us to develop arsenic (III) trithiol chemistry for translation to the NCA 72/77As radiotracer level. A NCA bicyclic [77As]arsenic trithiol was synthesized through the in situ reduction of arsenate to a reactive tris(monothiol)-As(III) intermediate. The high yield and stability of a single NCA 77As trithiol complex indicates this framework is suitable for development of matched pair agents for non-invasive in vivo imaging and radiotherapy of tumors with 72,77As. Studies are underway to synthesize a trithiol bifunctional chelate for conjugation to a targeting vector such as a peptide or monoclonal antibody.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Isotope Research Program under grants DE-SC0003851 and DE-SC0010283, and trainee support from NIBIB Training Grant 5 T32-EB004822 (AJD). The 77As was produced at the University of Missouri Research Reactor Center. The authors thank Drs. Nathan Leigh and Fabio Gallazzi from the University of Missouri Mass Spectrometry Facility for running the ESI-MS and LC-ESI-MS analysis, and Dr. Wei Wycoff from the University of Missouri NMR Facility for assistance with NMR studies.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Nayak TK, Brechbiel MW. Radioimmunoimaging with Longer-Lived Positron-Emitting Radionuclides: Potentials and Challenges. Bioconjugate Chem. 2009;20:825–841. doi: 10.1021/bc800299f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wycoff DE, Gott MD, DeGraffenreid AJ, Morrow RP, Sisay N, Embree MF, Ballard B, Fassbender ME, Cutler CS, Ketring AR, Jurisson SS. Chromatographic separation of selenium and arsenic: A potential 72Se/72As generator. J Chromatography A. 2014;1340:109–114. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.03.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ballard B, Nortier MF, Birnbaum RE, John DK, Phillips RD, Fassbender EM. Radioarsenic from a Portable 72Se/72As Generator: A Current Perspective. Current Radiopharmaceuticals. 2012;5(3):264–270. doi: 10.2174/1874471011205030264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jennewein M, Qaim SM, Kulkarni PV, Mason RP, Hermanne A, Rösch F. A no-carrier-added 72Se/72As radionuclide generator based on solid phase extraction. Radiochim Acta. 2005;93:579–583. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chajduk E, Doner K, Polkowska-Motrenko H, Bilewicz A. Novel radiochemical separation of arsenic from selenium for 72Se/72As generator. Appl Radiat Isot. 2012;70:819–822. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2012.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Phillips DR. Production of Selenium-72 and Arsenic-72. 5,371,372. United States Patent. 1994
- 7.Jahn M, Radchenko V, Filosofov D, Hauser H, Eisenhut M, Rösch F, Jennewein M. Separation and purification of no-carrier-added arsenic from bulk amounts of germanium for use in radiopharmaceutical labeling. Radiochim Acta. 2010;98:807–812. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jennewein M, Lewis MA, Zhao D, Tsyganov E, Slavine N, He J, Watkins L, Kodibagkar VD, O’Kelly S, Kulkarni P, Antich PP, Hermanne A, Rosch F, Mason RP, Thorpe PE. Vascular imaging of solid tumors in rats with a radioactive arsenic-labeled antibody that binds exposed phosphatidylserine. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:1377–85. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bokhari TH, Ahmad M, Khan IU. Separation of no-carrier-added arsenic-77 from neutron irradiated germanium. Radiochim Acta. 2009;97:503–506. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chattopadhyay S, Pal S, Vimalnath KV, Das MK. A versatile technique for radiochemical separation of medically useful no-carrier-added (nca) radioarsenic from irradiated germanium oxide targets. Appl Radiat Isot. 2007;65:1202–1207. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2007.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shehata MM, Scholten B, Spahn I, Coenen HH, Qaim SM. Separation of radioarsenic from irradiated germanium oxide targets for the production of 71As and 72As. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2011;287:435–442. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jennewein M, Qaim SM, Hermanne A, Jahn M, Tsyganov E, Slavine N, Seliounine S, Antich PA, Kulkarni PV, Thorpe PE, Mason RP, Rosch F. A new method for radiochemical separation of arsenic from irradiated germanium oxide. Appl Radiat Isot. 2005;63:343–351. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2005.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Maki Y, Murakami Y. The separation of arsenic-77 in a carrier-free state from the parent nuclide germanium-77 by a thin-layer chromatographic method. J Radioanal Chem. 1974;22:5–12. [Google Scholar]
- 14.National Nuclear Data Center. http://www.nndc.bnl.gov.
- 15.Andersen O. Principles and Recent Developments in Chelation Treatment of Metal Intoxication. Chem Rev. 1999;99:2683–2710. doi: 10.1021/cr980453a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Herth MM, Barz M, Jahn M, Zentel R, Roesch F. 72/74As-labeling of HMPA based polymers for long-term in vivo PET imaging. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2010;20:5454–5458. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.07.092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kitchin KT, Wallace K. Arsenite binding to synthetic peptides based on the Zn finger region and the estrogen binding region of the human estrogen receptor-α. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005;206:66–72. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2004.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jennewein M, Hermanne A, Mason RP, Thorpe PE, Roesch F. A new method for the labelling of proteins with radioactive arsenic isotopes. Nucl Instrum Meth Phys Res A. 2006;569:512–517. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jennewein M, Lewis MA, Zhao D, Tsyganov E, Slavine N, He J, Watkins L, Kodibagkar VD, O’Kelly S, Kulkarni P, Antich PP, Hermanne A, Roesch F, Mason RP, Thorpe PE. Vascular Imaging of Solid Tumors in Rats with Radioactive Arsenic-Labeled Antibody that Binds Exposed Phosphatidylserine. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:1377–1385. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sheldrick G. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallographica Section A. 2008;64:112–122. doi: 10.1107/S0108767307043930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sheldrick G. SADABS. University of Göttingen; Germany: 1996. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Camerano JA, Casado MA, Ciriano MA, Lahoz FJ, Oro LA. A Trithiol Protio-Ligand and Its Fixation to the Periphery of a Carbosilane Dendrimer as Scaffolds for Polynuclear Rhodium and Iridium Complexes and Metallodendrimers. Organometallics. 2005;24:5147–5156. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ustabas R, Sancak K, Er M, Unver Y, Coruh U, Vazquez-Lopez EM, Yavuz M. Ethene-1,1,2,2-tetrayltetramethylene tetrathiocyanate. Acta Cryst Sect E. 2005;61:3529–3531. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Konnert JH, Britton D. The crystal and molecular structure of methylene dithiocyanate. Acta Cryst Sect B. 1971;27:781–786. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bringeland R, Foss O. The Crystal and Molecular Structure of Ethylene Thiocyanate. Acta Chem Scand. 1958;12:79–88. [Google Scholar]
- 26.von Döllen A, Strasdeit H. Models for the Inhibition of Dithiol-Containing Enzymes by Organoarsenic Compounds: Synthetic Routes and the Structure of [PhAs(HlipS2)] (HlipS22−= Reduced Lipoic Acid) Eur J Inorg Chem. 1998;1998:61–66. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shaikh TA, Bakus RC, Parkin S, Atwood DA. Structural characteristics of 2-halo-1,3,2-dithiarsenic compounds and tris-(pentafluorophenylthio)-arsen. J Organomet Chem. 2006;691:1825–1833. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shaikh TA, Parkin S, Atwood DA. Synthesis and characterization of a rare arsenic trithiolate with an organic disulfide linkage and 2-chloro-benzo-1,3,2-dithiastibole. J Organomet Chem. 2006;691:4167–4171. [Google Scholar]