Influence of menstrual cycle phase on resting-state functional connectivity in naturally cycling, cigarette-dependent women

Abstract

Background

Sex differences in tobacco-related morbidity and mortality exist, with women experiencing more severe health consequences and greater difficulty with smoking cessation than men. One factor that likely contributes to these sex differences is menstrual cycle phase and associated neural and cognitive changes associated with ovarian hormone fluctuations across the menstrual cycle. Previously, we showed that naturally cycling, cigarette-dependent women in the follicular phase of their menstrual cycle showed greater reward-related neural activity and greater craving during smoking cue exposure. To better understand our results and the observed sex differences in smoking behavior and relapse, we explored potential menstrual cycle phase differences in resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) in naturally cycling, cigarette-dependent women. Understanding how menstrual cycle phase affects neural processes, cognition, and behavior is a critical step in developing more efficacious treatments and in selecting the best treatment option based on a patient’s needs.

Methods

Resting-state functional connectivity analyses were used to examine connectivity strength differences between naturally cycling, premenopausal, cigarette-dependent women who were in the follicular phase (FPs; n = 22) and those in the luteal phase (LPs, n = 16) of their menstrual cycle. We also explored associations between connectivity strength and attentional bias to smoking cues.

Results

Compared with LPs, FPs showed decreased rsFC between the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) and the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, medial orbitofrontal cortex (mOFC), and ventral striatum. Among FPs, rsFC strength between the dACC and the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), the bilateral dorsal striatum, and the left temporal gyrus was inversely correlated with attentional bias to smoking cues.

Conclusions

This is the first study to explore menstrual cycle phase differences in rsFC among cigarette-dependent women, and results suggest that FPs show differences in rsFC underlying cognitive control, which could place them at greater risk for continued smoking and relapse. These findings provide new insights toward individualized treatment strategies.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13293-016-0078-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background

Cigarette smoking remains the leading cause of preventable death in the USA [1], and sex differences in tobacco-related morbidity and mortality exist. Specifically, women experience more severe health consequences from cigarette smoking, including a 25 % increased risk of developing coronary heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [2], a higher incidence of lung cancer [3], and an increased incidence of lung cancer-related deaths [4]. Fortunately, smoking cessation at any age can reduce excess risk of tobacco-related diseases and death, yet women have greater difficulty with smoking cessation than men. Indeed, research suggests that women are less able to quit smoking than men, either when attempting to quit on their own [5] or with the aid of treatment [6–8]. Thus, understanding the factors that contribute to these sex differences is vital to improving women’s health and smoking cessation interventions.

Preclinical and clinical research suggests that ovarian hormones (i.e., estradiol and progesterone), which fluctuate over the course of the menstrual cycle [9], influence smoking behavior, and relapse vulnerability. For example, preclinical studies indicate that estradiol increases dopamine release in the ventral striatum [10, 11], contributes to faster acquisition of drug-seeking behavior and escalation of drug consumption, and accelerates drug-primed and drug-cue induced reinstatement, an animal model of relapse [12–14]. Preclinical studies of progesterone, however, indicate that high levels of progesterone decrease motivation for nicotine, as demonstrated by decreased nicotine self-administration [15]. Similarly, female smokers who were administered exogenous progesterone exhibited decreased positive subjective effects of cigarette smoking [16] and reduced urges to smoke [16, 17]. Collectively, these studies suggest that estradiol enhances reward and vulnerability to continued smoking and relapse in women; whereas, progesterone may protect against smoking-related behaviors and relapse [15, 18, 19], and as such, the fluctuation in ovarian hormones that occurs across the menstrual cycle may contribute to sex differences in smoking behavior and relapse.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has become a powerful tool in elucidating neural features underlying behavioral and cognitive differences, including sex and menstrual cycle phase differences. Our research group recently examined whether neural responses to appetitive smoking cues differed between naturally cycling, cigarette-dependent women who were in the follicular phase (FPs; low progesterone to estradiol ratio) compared to cigarette-dependent women who were in the luteal phase (LPs; high progesterone to estradiol ratio) of their menstrual cycle [20]. Findings indicated that FPs showed greater smoking cue-elicited craving and greater neural responses to smoking cues in the medial orbitofrontal cortex (mOFC) compared with LPs. Current evidence suggests that the mOFC is critically involved in the representation of the affective value of reward-related cues and reward-related decision-making [21, 22]. Thus, one potential explanation for these findings is that women in the follicular phase of their menstrual cycle may have greater connectivity between the mOFC and other reward-related brain regions compared to when they are in the luteal phase, perhaps resulting in less top-down, cognitive control and greater responses to appetitive smoking cues, increased craving, and vulnerability to relapse during a quit attempt.

Although fMRI provides information on brain activity in discrete regions, rsFC approaches allow for an examination of functional interactions between brain regions by identifying synchronized spontaneous fluctuations in the blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI signal [23, 24] or regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) [25] in the absence of a goal-directed task, (i.e., at rest). Thus, rsFC is thought to represent inherent brain organization, which influences brain function [26] and behavior [27]. While the vast majority of resting-state studies use BOLD fMRI resting-state data to examine rsFC, arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion fMRI provides the ability to image sustained brain activity because of its long-term temporal stability and to noninvasively quantify CBF [28]. Indeed, research indicates that ASL perfusion MRI is comparable to BOLD fMRI in assessing rsFC and resting-state networks [29]. To date, four studies have examined the effects of menstrual cycle phase on rsFC and yielded inconsistent findings [30–33]. Using independent components analysis (ICA), Petersen and colleagues (2014) conducted a cross-sectional study of rsFC in naturally cycling women and women using combined oral contraceptive pills and found that follicular females showed increased rsFC between the anterior default mode network (i.e., bilateral superior medial gyri, bilateral cingulate cortex, bilateral angular gyri, bilateral inferior frontal gyri, bilateral temporal poles, cerebellar vermis, right parahippocampal gyrus, right insular lobe, and right caudate nucleus) and the left angular gyrus compared with the luteal group. Follicular females also showed increased connectivity with the executive control network (i.e., bilateral cingulate cortex, bilateral supramarginal gyri, left insular lobe, bilateral middle frontal gyri, and right cuneus) and the right anterior cingulate cortex compared with luteal females [31]. Significant menstrual cycle phase differences were also observed in a longitudinal rsFC analysis of a single subject across four menstrual cycles using eigenvector centrality mapping [32]. Arelin and colleagues (2015) found that high levels of progesterone (i.e., luteal phase) were associated with increased rsFC between the bilateral sensorimotor cortex, right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and hippocampus. Two other studies examining menstrual cycle phase effects on rsFC using ICA found no menstrual cycle effects [30, 33]. Although informative, these studies were conducted in nonsmokers and tobacco use was not assessed or accounted for in analyses, and as such, research into the potential menstrual cycle phase differences in rsFC in naturally cycling, cigarette-dependent women is warranted.

The goal of the present study is to improve our understanding of smoking-related sex differences, specifically differences in inherent brain connectivity that may increase or protect against vulnerability to smoking behaviors and relapse. To this end, we expand upon previous research [20, 34] by examining menstrual cycle phase differences in rsFC of the mOFC cluster that differed between FPs and LPs during smoking cue exposure. Based on our previous findings and research suggesting that the follicular phase (low progesterone to estradiol ratio) is associated with increased activation of reward-related circuitry [35], we hypothesized that FPs would exhibit increased functional connectivity between the mOFC and other reward-related brain regions. In order to explore potential luteal phase effects, we focused on rsFC of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), a brain region shown to be involved in cognitive control, craving reappraisal, and modulation of reactivity to cues [34, 36–38]. Given that the luteal phase is associated with higher levels of progesterone and protection against vulnerabilities to smoking behaviors and relapse, we hypothesized that LPs would show greater rsFC between the dACC and reward-related regions, as the dACC could be exerting more cognitive control over reward-related responses.

Methods

Participants

Participants were recruited via radio advertisements and local list-serves describing ongoing studies examining individual differences in smoking cue reactivity and smoking behavior [20, 39]. All eligible and interested participants provided informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Telephone screens and medical and psychiatric evaluations were used to assess participant eligibility during an in-person screening visit. Ineligible participants were those who reported other current substance dependence, had current Axis I DSM-IV psychiatric diagnoses, had significant medical conditions, reported a history of head trauma or injury causing loss of consciousness lasting greater than three minutes or associated with skull fracture or inter-cranial bleeding, or had irremovable magnetically active objects on or within their body. Males, pregnant or lactating women, post- or peri-menopausal women, women with irregular menstrual cycle length or outside the range of 26–30 days, women using exogenous hormones and/or hormonal contraceptives, and women currently experiencing difficulties with their menstrual cycle (e.g., spotting between menses, current diagnoses of premenstrual syndrome or premenstrual dysphoric disorder) were also excluded.

Thirty-eight physically healthy premenopausal smokers ranging in age from 21 to 51 years were included in the current analyses (Table 1). Perfusion fMRI data from these participants were previously reported in a study examining the influence of menstrual cycle phase on neural responses to smoking cues [20]. Participants received $100.00 for completing the study. The study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and the University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board approved all procedures.

Table 1.

Participant characteristics

	All N = 38	Follicular phase n = 22	Luteal phase n = 16	p
Demographics
Age	33.9 ± 1.7	32.4 ± 2.3	35.9 ± 2.5	0.31
African American (n), %	50.0 (19)	50.0 (11)	50.0 (8)	1.00
Years of education	14.4 ± 0.3	14.4 ± 1.8	14.5 ± 2.6	0.90
Smoking characteristics
Cigarettes per day	12.6 ± 0.7	11.5 ± 0.9	13.9 ± 1.1	0.12
Years smoking	14.6 ± 1.8	12.7 ± 2.4	17.3 ± 2.5	0.21
Pack yearsa	10.3 ± 1.5	8.6 ± 2.0	12.7 ± 2.3	0.20
FTND scores	4.4 ± 0.3	4.1 ± 0.3	4.9 ± 0.4	0.13

FTND Fagerström test for nicotine dependence, FTND scores ranged from 1 to 9

^aPack years calculation: cigarettes per day (÷) cigarettes in a pack (×) years smoking

Measures

During the screening visit, participants completed the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview [40], which assessed current DSM-IV diagnosis of substance dependence other than nicotine and current severe psychiatric symptoms. Participants also completed the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) [41], which was used to determine severity of nicotine dependence, and the Menstrual Cycle Questionnaire (MCQ), a measure developed within our laboratory that assesses menstrual cycle information and was used to identify menstrual cycle phase. The MCQ provides information on menstrual cycle length, regularity, first day of last menses, premenstrual symptoms, and method of birth control (Additional file 1). A brief MCQ is administered on the day of scanning and is used to determine what day of the menstrual cycle the participant is on when scanning occurs. Based on this information, women were either excluded or separated into two groups: follicular phase females or luteal phase females. The luteal phase was defined as the 8 days prior to the first day of menses, and the follicular phase comprised the first 7 days after the onset of menses [42, 43]. Menstrual cycle data was collected over one to two menstrual cycles and depended on when the participant completed their scanning session.

Attentional bias to smoking cues

On the day of the neuroimaging scanning session, 34 participants (19 FPs) completed an off-magnet visual dot-probe behavioral task, described in detail elsewhere [44, 45], designed to objectively measure attention shifts toward smoking pictures. Briefly, participants were sated when completing the task, which consisted of 20 color photographs of smoking-related content (e.g., pack of cigarettes) and 20 photographs not specifically related to smoking (e.g., pack of playing cards). Participants were told that picture pairs would briefly flash on the screen followed by an asterisk (the dot probe) in the position previously occupied by one of the pictures. Participants were asked to indicate the position of the target as quickly and accurately as possible by using the left and right index fingers to strike the left or right response key, respectively. After a 20-trial practice block containing picture pairs without smoking-related stimuli, participants completed 80 stimulus pair trials. Each stimulus pair was presented four times, counterbalancing for picture/dot-probe location. For each subject, a relative attentional bias score was computed as RT_non-smoking − RT_smoking with positive bias scores reflecting attentional bias for SCs and negative scores reflecting bias toward non-smoking cues.

Resting-state scan

Pseudo-continuous arterial spin-labeled (pCASL) perfusion fMRI, a quantitative estimate of CBF and indirect measurement of neural activity [46], measured resting-state CBF. Before the scanning session, participants smoked a cigarette to satiety in the presence of study personnel to minimize nicotine withdrawal-induced craving that might accrue during the scanning session. The 5-min pCASL resting-state scan was acquired first in a 40-min scanning session to avoid task-related cerebral blood flow influences. The scan was acquired approximately 20–25 min after smoking to allow the acute cardiovascular effects of smoking to dissipate. Prior to the resting-state scan, participants are provided the following instructions: “Please try not to move your head or any other part of your body. Relax and clear your mind as much as you can. Remember to stay awake and keep your eyes open.”

Imaging approach and acquisition

Imaging data were acquired on a 3.0 Tesla Trio whole-body scanner (Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany). For co-registration of the functional data, a T1-weighted three-dimensional (3D) high resolution magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (MPRAGE) scan was acquired with repetition time (TR) = 1620 ms, echo time (TE) = 3.09 ms, inversion time (TI) = 960 ms, 192 × 256 × 160 matrix, slice thickness = 1 mm, and flip angle = 15° for 32 subjects and TR = 1620 ms, TE = 3.87 ms, TI = 950 ms, 192 × 256 × 160 matrix, slice thickness = 1 mm, and flip angle = 15° for six subjects. pCASL perfusion fMRI sequence was used for resting-state data acquisition. Interleaved images with and without labeling were obtained using a gradient echo echo-planar imaging sequence with a post-labeling delay of 1000 ms, field of view (FOV) = 220 × 220 mm², 64 × 64 matrix, TR/TE = 3500/17 ms, flip angle = 90°, slice thickness = 6 mm, voxel size = 3.438 × 3.428 × 7.2 mm with a 2-mm inter-slice gap for 32 subjects and post-labeling delay of 700 ms, FOV = 220 × 220 mm², 64 × 64 matrix, TR/TE = 3000/17 ms, flip angle = 90°, slice thickness = 8 mm, voxel size = 3.438 × 3.428 × 10 mm with a 1.2 mm inter-slice gap for six subjects. A homogeneity of variance test assessed whether data acquisition differences influenced findings, and no significant differences were observed.

Statistical analyses

A Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM)-based arterial spin labeling (ASL) data processing toolbox [47] was used for pCASL perfusion data analyses, as described previously [48, 49]. Briefly, the first step in our pre-processing pipeline was motion correction (MoCo) and denoising [50]. Next, ASL image pairs were realigned to the mean of all control images and spatially smoothed with a 3D isotropic Gaussian kernel at 9-mm full width at half maximum (FWHM). For resting-state data, 38 CBF image series were generated from the 76 label/control ASL image pairs using the same methods for CBF calculations. The mean control image of each subject’s data was co-registered to the structural image using the mutual information based co-registration algorithm provided by SPM8. The same transformation parameters were applied to co-register the CBF maps to each subject’s anatomical image. Subsequently, the structural image was spatially normalized to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) standard brain. The resulting transformation matrix was used to align the CBF images to MNI space. A binary brain mask was used to exclude the non-brain areas in the CBF maps.

Correlation analyses examined menstrual cycle phase differences in the temporal relationship between the mOFC seed region and other brain regions and between the dACC seed region and other brain regions. The functionally identified, mOFC seed region (10-mm sphere centered at [−2, 38, −20]) was used based on our previous study showing menstrual cycle phase differences in neural responses to smoking cues [20]. We centered another 10-mm sphere seed in the dACC [0, 10, 38] to explore potential modulation of reward circuitry. A cross-correlation coefficient (CC) map was obtained for each seed by correlating the average time course of the seed region with each voxel’s time course over the brain. The resulting correlation coefficients were converted to z-scores using Fisher’s r-to-z transformation. The Z maps were then analyzed in a random-effects model in SPM8 to compare FP and LP connectivity. We identified regions showing differences in connectivity strength with a significant voxelwise statistical threshold (p < 0.005), and to control for multiple comparisons, voxels were required to be part of a cluster >285 voxels, as determined by a Monte-Carlo simulation using the corrected version of 3dClustSim (Analysis of Functional NeuroImages, https://afni.nimh.nih.gov/) that resulted in 5 % probability (corrected) of a cluster surviving due to chance.

Secondary analyses. Secondary regression analyses examined potential associations between rsFC of our two a priori seed regions (i.e., mOFC and dACC) and attentional bias to smoking cues scores, a clinically significant measure of implicit processing and selective attention for smoking-related stimuli [51]. Separate regression analyses were conducted for FPs (n = 19) and LPs (n = 15). Sample sizes for the secondary analyses decreased due to missing and/or unusable attentional bias data. The statistical threshold for the exploratory secondary analyses was p < 0.01 with voxels required to be part of a cluster >100 voxels.

Demographic and behavioral statistical analyses

Continuous demographic variables were summarized by calculating means and standard error measurements (X ± SEMs). Independent samples t tests compared follicular and luteal females on continuous variables. Nominal demographic variables were summarized by calculating proportions and compared across groups using chi-square analyses.

Results

Participant characteristics

Table 1 provides participant demographics and smoking characteristics. There were no significant menstrual cycle phase differences in age, education, race/ethnicity, cigarettes per day, number of years smoking, pack years, or FTND scores (ps > 0.12).

Resting-state functional connectivity analyses

Analyses examining menstrual cycle phase differences in resting-state connectivity in cigarette-dependent women revealed no significant differences in rsFC of the mOFC between FPs and LPs. For the dACC, FPs showed decreased rsFC between the dACC and a large cluster spanning the left subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC), mOFC, and ventral striatum compared with LPs (Fig. 1). FPs also exhibited increased connectivity strength between the dACC and a cluster in the supplementary motor area/precentral gyrus compared with LPs.

Fig. 1.

Menstrual cycle phase differences in resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) strength. Compared with cigarette-dependent women in the luteal phase of their menstrual cycle (LPs), cigarette-dependent women in the follicular phase of their menstrual cycle (FPs) showed decreased rsFC strength between the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) seed region and a large cluster spanning the mOFC, subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, and the striatum. Images are displayed neurologically (left is left)

Secondary analyses

In an attempt to shed light on potential mechanisms underlying menstrual cycle phase differences, exploratory secondary analyses examined associations between rsFC and attentional bias to smoking cues. Among FPs, rsFC strength between the dACC and the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), the bilateral dorsal striatum, and the left temporal gyrus showed inverse correlations with attentional bias to smoking cue scores (Fig. 2). There were no other significant correlations between rsFC of the mOFC or the dACC and attentional bias scores among FPs or LPs.

Fig. 2.

Associations between dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) and attentional bias to smoking cue scores within the cigarette-dependent women in the follicular phase of their menstrual cycle (FPs) group. The plots show the correlations between the dACC seeded rsFC strength and attentional bias to smoking cue scores acquired when FPs were sated and prior to the scanning session. Values on the axes are the z-scores extracted from the secondary analyses exploring the association between dACC rsFC strength and attentional bias to smoking cues at a threshold of p < .01 and clusters >100 voxels. Images are displayed neurologically (left is left). DLPFC dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, DS dorsal striatum

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine menstrual cycle phase effects on rsFC in cigarette-dependent women. Findings revealed unique menstrual cycle phase differences in dACC rsFC. Specifically, FPs exhibited decreased rsFC strength between the dACC and reward-related regions compared with LPs. Exploratory secondary analyses showed that rsFC between the dACC and reward-related regions was inversely correlated with attentional bias to smoking cues among FPs. These findings provide new insights into menstrual cycle effects on rsFC and potential mechanisms underlying sex differences in smoking behavior and relapse.

Contrary to expectations, FPs and LPs did not show differences in mOFC rsFC at our conservative statistical thresholds. When we relaxed statistical thresholds to p < 0.01, we observed increased connectivity strength between the mOFC and caudal DLPFC in FPs compared with LPs, which is similar to findings reported by Petersen and colleagues (2014) suggesting that women in the follicular phase show increased connectivity of the anterior default mode network (DMN) compared with women in the luteal phase [31]. Given our small sample size and cross-sectional approach, future research in a larger, longitudinal sample of women could provide more insight into potential differences in mOFC rsFC of women in their follicular phase compared with their luteal phase.

In previous research, Hong and colleagues (2010) found that smokers exhibited reduced rsFC strength between the dACC and the ventral striatum and posited that weakened connectivity strength within this circuit represents a “trait-like” biomarker of nicotine addiction [52]. Here, we replicated these earlier findings of altered functional connectivity strength between the dACC and the ventral striatum and extended findings to include other reward-related regions. Structurally, the dACC projects to the entire striatum [53], and functionally, studies suggest that the dACC is involved in reward-related decision-making [54, 55], conflict monitoring [56, 57], and craving regulation in smokers [34]. Thus, decreased connectivity strength between the dACC and reward-related regions in FPs may reflect reduced cognitive regulation over smoking behaviors.

Although participants in this study were cigarette-dependent, the seed regions chosen for analyses are not exclusively related to smoking or smoking behaviors, and all participants were sated (not experiencing nicotine withdrawal) at the time of scanning. Consequently, our findings may represent a more fundamental effect of menstrual cycle phase on rsFC rather than an effect observed only in cigarette-dependent women. Thus, findings could suggest that women in the follicular phase of their menstrual cycle may show similar decreases in rsFC between the dACC and reward-related regions and experience reduced cognitive control over rewarding behaviors in general. This interpretation is speculative, and additional research into this possibility is warranted.

With repeated cigarette use and associated dopamine-related processes within the mesocorticolimbic and nigrostriatal circuits, smoking-related cues acquire incentive-motivational salience, which gives them the ability to trigger craving [58]. Smoking cues also acquire attentional salience, which manifests as an attentional bias for smoking cues in cigarette-dependent individuals [45, 51]. Consequently, we explored the relationship between resting-state connectivity and attentional bias to smoking cues in an attempt to identify potential mechanisms underlying the observed menstrual cycle phase differences and menstrual cycle effects on smoking-related behaviors. We found that attentional bias to smoking cues among FPs was inversely correlated with rsFC strength between the dACC and the bilateral DLPFC, the bilateral dorsal striatum, and a cluster in the left temporal gyrus. Thus, the decreased connectivity observed among FPs may reflect or partially reflect dACC dysfunction that could result in greater attentional bias to smoking cues and associated reward-related responses to smoking cues [20]. Based on this secondary analysis, we speculate that altered dACC connectivity during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle may serve as a neural substrate of reduced cognitive regulation over smoking-related cognition and behaviors.

We previously showed that FPs had greater smoking cue-elicited craving and greater responses in the mOFC when viewing 10-min video clips of appetitive smoking reminders (compared to clips of non-smoking material) [20]. In the present study, we tested whether menstrual cycle phase influences rsFC in cigarette-dependent female smokers in order to better understand our results and the observed sex differences in smoking behavior and relapse [5–8]. Understanding how menstrual cycle phase affects neural processes, cognition, and behavior is a critical step in developing more efficacious treatments and in selecting the best treatment option based on a patient’s needs. Given that FPs exhibited altered rsFC between cognitive control and reward-related regions compared with LPs, we posit that decreased dACC-sgACC/mOFC/striatal connectivity strength may reflect impaired regulatory processes that could contribute to continued smoking behavior and increased relapse vulnerability among female smokers in the follicular phase of their menstrual cycle. As such, our findings suggest that women who opt to make a quit attempt during their follicular phase may benefit from additional support and treatment approaches that focus on increasing cognitive control, such as cognitive bias modification [59, 60]. Further, findings support previous research indicating that female smokers may be more successful at smoking cessation if they set a quit date during their luteal phase [61, 62], when female smokers appear to have greater cognitive control over smoking-related urges and behaviors.

The current findings should be interpreted in light of the following limitations. Importantly, menstrual cycle phase was not biochemically verified, and thus, we used menstrual cycle phase as a proxy for ovarian hormone function. Although others have demonstrated that paradigmatic measures of verification align with menstrual cycle phase self-report [63, 64], knowledge of menstrual phase does not necessarily translate to the hormonal milieu. For example, over one third of menstrual cycles are anovulatory, and hormones do not fluctuate normally during anovulatory cycles [65]. Consequently, even if menstrual cycle phase was correctly identified in the current study, one must be cautious in extrapolating knowledge of menstrual cycle phase to knowledge of hormonal status. Indeed, we acknowledge that the most scientifically rigorous test of our hypothesis would be to acquire data within women at multiple time points across the menstrual cycle (biochemically verified). This study is also limited in that we focused solely on menstrual cycle differences in rsFC of the mOFC and dACC. We recognize that many factors and other resting-state and task-related networks are at play, including negative affect/mood, stress, and variance in genes [49, 66, 67]. As such, future research could explore these factors, as well as other cognitive constructs associated with cigarette use to help better understand how menstrual cycle phase influences smoking behavior and relapse vulnerability and how these factors contribute to sex differences.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, the current data represent the first examination of menstrual cycle effects on rsFC in cigarette-dependent women. These findings, along with our previous research demonstrating greater neural responses to smoking cues and cue-elicited craving among FPs [20], suggest that cigarette-dependent women in the follicular phase of their menstrual cycle experience task-related functional and rsFC abnormalities that may place them at greater risk for continued smoking behavior and relapse should they make a quit attempt. As such, this study provides important information that may help guide individualized treatment strategies and improve smoking cessation rates.

Abbreviations

3D

three-dimensional

ASL

arterial spin labeling

BOLD

blood oxygen level-dependent

CBF

cerebral blood flow

CC

cross-correlation coefficient

dACC

dorsal anterior cingulate cortex

DLPFC

dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

DMN

default mode network

DS

dorsal striatum

DSM-IV

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition)

fMRI

functional magnetic resonance imaging

FOV

field of view

FPs

cigarette-dependent women in the follicular phase of their menstrual cycle

FTND

Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence

FWHM

full width at half maximum

ICA

independent components analysis

LPs

cigarette-dependent women in the luteal phase of their menstrual cycle

MCQ

Menstrual Cycle Questionnaire

MNI

Montreal Neurological Institute

MoCO

motion correction

mOFC

medial orbitofrontal cortex

MPRAGE

magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo

pCASL

pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling

rsFC

resting-state functional connectivity

SEM

standard error of the mean

sgACC

subgenual anterior cingulate cortex

SPM

Statistical Parametric Mapping

TE

echo time

TI

inversion time

TR

repetition time

Additional file

Additional file 1: ^{(32.8KB, docx)}

Menstrual Cycle Questionnaire. The menstrual cycle questionnaire (MCQ) used in this study. (DOCX 32 kb)