Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
letter
. 2016 Apr 22;60(5):3253–3256. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03016-15

Rapid Whole-Cell Assay of Antitubercular Drugs Using Second-Generation Fluoromycobacteriophages

Estefanía Urdániz a, Liliana Rondón a, Marcelo A Martí a, Graham F Hatfull b, Mariana Piuri a,
PMCID: PMC4862496  PMID: 26976860

LETTER

Tuberculosis (TB) is a major human health concern and kills about 3,500 people each day (1). The emergence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-resistant strains has become a serious public health problem worldwide, complicating treatment and control of the disease. There is a need for new and efficient antitubercular drugs that shorten the time of treatment and frequency of administration, have less toxicity, and require less patient surveillance (25). A novel, rapid, and sensitive assay to be used in activity testing and screening of new compounds could be part of the solution to the TB health challenges.

We previously described the development of fluoromycobacteriophages as a new class of reporter phages that provide a simple means of indicating the metabolic state of M. tuberculosis cells and thus their response to antibiotics (6) (7). Mycobacterial cells can easily be detected by fluorescence microscopy or flow cytometry after infection with the reporter phage.

To construct second-generation fluoromycobacteriophages with greater sensitivity and shorter time to M. tuberculosis detection, we used a modified mCherrybomb version with codon usage optimized for mycobacteria under the control of the hsp60 promoter and with the predicted ribosome binding site (RBS) of gp9 of mycobacteriophage TM4, the major capsid protein (8, 9). Panels A to C of Fig. 1 show a comparison between mycobacterial cells transformed with the expression plasmid before and after substitution of the RBS associated with the hsp60 promoter. The original vector in shuttle phasmid phAE159 (10) was replaced with pYUB854 carrying the hsp60prom-gp9RBS-mCherrybomb cassette. Phage particles were obtained as previously described (6), and the newly constructed phage was called mCherrybombΦ.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Construction of new mCherrybombϕ. (A and B) M. smegmatis mc2155 colonies after transformation with pJL37::hsp60prom-mCherrybomb (A) or pJL37::hsp60prom-gp9RBS-mCherrybomb (B). (C) Flow cytometry analysis of M. smegmatis mc2155 control (gray) transformed as described for panel A (pink) or panel B (purple). The intensity of fluorescence is plotted against the number of events normalized to the mode. PE-A, phycoerythrin A. (D and E) Infection of M. tuberculosis mc26230 with the new mCherrybombϕ for 5 h at 37°C. Phase-contrast images (D) and fluorescence micrograph images (E) are shown. Magnification, ×1,000.

After infection of M. tuberculosis mc26230 (ΔRD1 ΔpanCD) (11), bright red cells were observed by fluorescence microscopy after only 5 h (Fig. 1D and E), showing a notable reduction of the time required to detect the signal compared to previous phAE87::hsp60-EGFP (enhanced green fluorescent protein) (6) and other fluorescent reporter phages (12). We then evaluated the detection of M. tuberculosis-infected cells by monitoring the expression kinetics of mCherrybomb using an automated multiwell plate reader fluorimeter. After infection with mCherrybombΦ, the maximal readout was reached at 4 to 6 h versus 10 h with the previous GFP phage (6). Moreover, the signal/background ratio (total number of fluorescence units/number of fluorescence units of cells plus phage at time zero) was higher for the new reporter phage, allowing better discrimination between noninfected and infected cells (Fig. 2A).

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Monitoring of fluorescence after infection of M. tuberculosis with fluoromycobacteriophages using a fluorimeter. (A) Fluorescence units (FU) versus time after infection of M. tuberculosis mc26230 with phAE87::hsp60-EGFP (circles) or mCherrybombϕ (squares). (B) Schematic representation of the multiwell plate setup and output fluorescence reading for activity testing of drugs. Black represents maximal FU and white absence of signal. Different shades of gray are used for intermediate values. Control (CTRL) wells without drug are shown. EMB and EMB(24), EMB without and with 24 h of preincubation; INH and INH(24), INH without and with 24 h of preincubation. (C to J) Relative fluorescence units (RFU) versus time after infection of M. tuberculosis mc26230 Kanr with second-generation fluoromycobacteriophages in the presence of increasing concentrations of the following antibiotics: rifampin (RIF) (C); streptomycin (STR) (D); ofloxacin (OFX) (E); kanamycin (KAN) (F); ethambutol (EMB) (G and I); isoniazid (INH) (H and J). Antibiotics were added simultaneously with mCherrybombϕ (C to H) or preincubated with cells for 24 h before infection (I and J).

We further measured the fluorescent signal after infection in the presence of 2-fold dilutions of the drugs most commonly used for TB treatment. A schematic representation of the 96-well plate setup and the output signal for this assay is presented in Fig. 2B. To avoid background differences among mCherrybombϕ stocks, we calculated relative fluorescence units (RFU) as follows:

RFU=mean fluorescence unitsbackgroundmaximal fluorescence reading unitsbackground

A decrease in the fluorescent signal was observed for increasing concentrations of the tested compounds (Fig. 2), allowing MIC determinations. With this assay, we were able to corroborate the antibiotic resistance phenotype of the M. tuberculosis mc26230 kanamycin-resistant (Kanr) derivative strain used in this work (Fig. 2F).

As we previously reported (6), when the target of the tested drug is gene expression (transcription or translation), phage and antibiotics could effectively be added simultaneously (Fig. 2C to F). When the antibiotic had a different target (e.g., cell wall synthesis), a preincubation of 24 h was necessary prior to addition of mCherrybombΦ (Fig. 2G to J). Based on this requirement, in testing new compounds, a preliminary mechanism of action of the drug can be inferred.

In comparison with other whole-cell assays for activity testing of compounds (1318), results using fluoromycobacteriophages can be obtained in hours in contrast to days; no addition of substrate is needed (13, 14, 19), and, since mycobacterial cultures can be maintained constantly growing, they are readily available when needed. All these features make mCherrybombΦ in combination with automated fluorimetric detection a convenient tool for activity testing of new antitubercular drugs and a potential rapid drug susceptibility testing (DST) assay of M. tuberculosis clinical isolates.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Eric Rubin (Harvard School of Public Health) for providing the codon-optimized mCherrybomb and William Jacobs, Jr. (Albert Einstein College of Medicine), for the M. tuberculosis mc26230 Kanr strain.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by U.S. National Institutes of Health (FIRCA-BB) R03TW008926 to G.F.H. and M.P. (LMICC); Bunge & Born Foundation FBBEI16/12 to M.P. and ANPCyT PICT-O 0057 to M.M. E.U. and L.R. are doctoral fellows of CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Argentina).

REFERENCES

  • 1.WHO. 2014. Global tuberculosis report. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schito M, Migliori GB, Fletcher HA, McNerney R, Centis R, D'Ambrosio L, Bates M, Kibiki G, Kapata N, Corrah T, Bomanji J, Vilaplana C, Johnson D, Mwaba P, Maeurer M, Zumla A. 2015. Perspectives on advances in tuberculosis diagnostics, drugs, and vaccines. Clin Infect Dis 61(Suppl 3):S102–S118. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zumla A, Chakaya J, Centis R, D'Ambrosio L, Mwaba P, Bates M, Kapata N, Nyirenda T, Chanda D, Mfinanga S, Hoelscher M, Maeurer M, Migliori GB. 2015. Tuberculosis treatment and management—an update on treatment regimens, trials, new drugs, and adjunct therapies. Lancet Respir Med 3:220–234. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00063-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zuniga ES, Early J, Parish T. 2015. The future for early-stage tuberculosis drug discovery. Future Microbiol 10:217–229. doi: 10.2217/fmb.14.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sotgiu G, Centis R, D'Ambrosio L, Migliori GB. 2015. Tuberculosis treatment and drug regimens. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 5:a017822. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a017822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Piuri M, Jacobs WR Jr, Hatfull GF. 2009. Fluoromycobacteriophages for rapid, specific, and sensitive antibiotic susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS One 4:e4870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rondón L, Piuri M, Jacobs WR Jr, de Waard J, Hatfull GF, Takiff HE. 2011. Evaluation of fluoromycobacteriophages for detecting drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 49:1838–1842. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02476-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ford ME, Stenstrom C, Hendrix RW, Hatfull GF. 1998. Mycobacteriophage TM4: genome structure and gene expression. Tuber Lung Dis 79:63–73. doi: 10.1054/tuld.1998.0007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Piuri M, Rondon L, Urdaniz E, Hatfull GF. 2013. Generation of affinity-tagged fluoromycobacteriophages by mixed assembly of phage capsids. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:5608–5615. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01016-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bardarov S Jr, Pavelka MS Jr, Sambandamurthy V, Larsen M, Tufariello J, Chan J, Hatfull G, Jacobs WR Jr. 2002. Specialized transduction: an efficient method for generating marked and unmarked targeted gene disruptions in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, M. bovis BCG and M. smegmatis. Microbiology 148:3007–3017. doi: 10.1099/00221287-148-10-3007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sambandamurthy VK, Jacobs WR Jr. 2005. Live attenuated mutants of Mycobacterium tuberculosis as candidate vaccines against tuberculosis. Microbes Infect 7:955–961. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2005.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jain P, Hartman TE, Eisenberg N, O'Donnell MR, Kriakov J, Govender K, Makume M, Thaler DS, Hatfull GF, Sturm AW, Larsen MH, Moodley P, Jacobs WR Jr. 2012. phi(2)GFP10, a high-intensity fluorophage, enables detection and rapid drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from sputum samples. J Clin Microbiol 50:1362–1369. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06192-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Riska PF, Jacobs WR Jr, Bloom BR, McKitrick J, Chan J. 1997. Specific identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with the luciferase reporter mycobacteriophage: use of p-nitro-alpha-acetylamino-beta-hydroxy propiophenone. J Clin Microbiol 35:3225–3231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shawar RM, Humble DJ, Van Dalfsen JM, Stover CK, Hickey MJ, Steele S, Mitscher LA, Baker W. 1997. Rapid screening of natural products for antimycobacterial activity by using luciferase-expressing strains of Mycobacterium bovis BCG and Mycobacterium intracellulare. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 41:570–574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Andreu N, Fletcher T, Krishnan N, Wiles S, Robertson BD. 2012. Rapid measurement of antituberculosis drug activity in vitro and in macrophages using bioluminescence. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:404–414. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ollinger J, Bailey MA, Moraski GC, Casey A, Florio S, Alling T, Miller MJ, Parish T. 2013. A dual read-out assay to evaluate the potency of compounds active against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS One 8:e60531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Franzblau SG, DeGroote MA, Cho SH, Andries K, Nuermberger E, Orme IM, Mdluli K, Angulo-Barturen I, Dick T, Dartois V, Lenaerts AJ. 2012. Comprehensive analysis of methods used for the evaluation of compounds against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 92:453–488. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2012.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Collins LA, Torrero MN, Franzblau SG. 1998. Green fluorescent protein reporter microplate assay for high-throughput screening of compounds against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42:344–347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Banaiee N, Bobadilla-del-Valle M, Riska PF, Bardarov S Jr, Small PM, Ponce-de-Leon A, Jacobs WR Jr, Hatfull GF, Sifuentes-Osornio J. 2003. Rapid identification and susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from MGIT cultures with luciferase reporter mycobacteriophages. J Med Microbiol 52:557–561. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.05149-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES