Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;854:45–51. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-17121-0_7

A brief discussion on lipid activated nuclear receptors and their potential role in regulating microglia in age-related macular degeneration (AMD)

Mayur Choudhary 1, Goldis Malek 1
PMCID: PMC4862829  NIHMSID: NIHMS780046  PMID: 26427392

Abstract

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of legal blindness and visual impairment in individuals over 60 years of age in the Western World. A common morphological denominator in all forms of AMD is the accumulation of microglia within the sub-retinal space, which is believed to be a contributing factor to AMD progression. However, the signaling pathway and molecular players regulating microglial recruitment have not been completely identified. Multiple in-vitro and in-vivo studies, to date, have highlighted the contributions of nuclear receptor ligands in the treatment of inflammation related disorders such as atherosclerosis and Alzheimer’s disease. Given that inflammation and the immune response play a vital role in the initiation and progression of AMD, in this brief review we will highlight some of these studies with a particular focus on the lipid activated “adopted orphan” nuclear receptors, the liver x receptors (LXRs) and the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs). The results of these studies strongly support the rationale that treatment with LXR and PPAR ligands may ameliorate microglial activation in the sub-retinal space and ultimately slow down or reverse the progression of AMD.

XX. 1 Introduction

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is one of the leading causes of progressive blindness in the elderly (Coleman et al. 2008). Clinically, AMD progresses from early to intermediate stages of the disease and subsequently to the two major advanced forms, namely, geographic atrophy (GA) or “late dry” and neovascular or “wet” AMD. The pathogenesis of early AMD involves the accumulation of lipid- and protein-rich extracellular deposits called drusen under the retinal pigment epithelial cells (RPE). The progression to the late dry form involves RPE dystrophy with a loss of photoreceptors in the central macula and subsequent blindness. Wet AMD, which affects approximately 10% of the AMD patients, is characterized by development of abnormal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) under the retina, which leads to scarring in the macular region. Currently there are no treatments available for dry AMD, but anti-angiogenic approaches targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are available for wet AMD patients with some success. Therefore there is an immediate need to identify new targets and develop alternate therapeutic approaches to help people afflicted with this disease.

XX. 2 Microglial cells accumulate within the retina and subretinal space of AMD patients

Retinal microglia represent a population of macrophages, which constantly survey their microenvironment, responding to cellular damage by increasing their phagocytic activity (Karlstetter and Langmann 2014) Multiple reports have corroborated the role of inflammation and microglial cells in the pathogenesis of the early and late forms of AMD (Patel and Chan 2008). The sub-retinal space, the interface between the RPE and the outer segments of photoreceptors, in particular, is a region of great interest in studies of inflammation in AMD. Under normal conditions, retinal microglia are excluded from the outer retina, due to the presence of immunosuppressive factors secreted by the RPE (Zamiri et al. 2007). As such, RPE cells play an important role in immunomodulation of the outer retina, regulating RPE-microglial interactions though expression of cytokine receptors, production and secretion of inflammatory cytokines and adhesion molecules, and regulation of the tight-junction integrity (Holtkamp et al. 2001; Streilein et al. 2002). In advanced age, following light-induced photoreceptor injury, and in late AMD, an influx of microglia to outer retina has been observed, followed by, their accumulation within the sub-retinal space (Ng and Streilein 2001; Gupta et al. 2003). In support of this, evaluation of retinal samples from the Cx3cr1−/− mice [chemokine (c-x3-c motif) receptor 1, important in microglial migration], has revealed the accumulation of subretinal microglia associated with drusen-like deposits, RPE structural alterations, and CNV formation (Combadiere et al. 2007; Tuo et al. 2007). It is clear, that a better understanding of RPE-microglial cell interactions is imperative in accurately explaining the inflammatory etiology of AMD and ultimately developing new therapeutic targets.

XX.3 Overview of lipid-activated nuclear receptors

Nuclear receptors are the largest superfamily of transcription factors in the human genome. There is increasing evidence of their involvement in metabolic regulation of immune cells. This mini-review will focus on the role of the liver x receptors (LXRs) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) in shaping the metabolic and immune functions of microglial cells and macrophages, since these receptors have been most extensively studied in diseases, which share common pathogenic pathways with AMD, including atherosclerosis, metabolic syndrome and Alzheimer’s disease.

LXRs are critical regulators of cholesterol homeostasis, glucose homeostasis, detoxification of bile acids, immunity, and neurological functions (Apfel et al. 1994). Their activating ligands include endogenous oxidized and hydroxylated cholesterol derivatives (22(R)- hydroxycholesterol and 24(S)-hydroxycholesterol) and synthetic agonists (GW3965 and TO901317) (Lehmann et al. 1997; Viennois et al. 2011). Although the two isoforms, LXRα (NR1H3) and LXRβ (NR1H2) show significant similarities in their DNA binding domain and ligand binding domains, their tissue expression patterns are different (Jakobsson et al. 2012). LXRα is predominantly expressed in metabolically active tissues, while LXRβ is ubiquitously expressed (Laffitte et al. 2001).

PPARs were originally discovered as receptors that induce the proliferation of peroxisomes in Xenopus (Dreyer et al. 1992). Three isoforms have been identified (Berger and Moller 2002). PPARα (NR1C1) regulates fatty acid oxidation and is highly expressed in tissues which perform substantial mitochondrial and peroxisomal β-oxidation such as brown adipose tissue, liver, kidney and heart (Kliewer et al. 1994). PPARβ/δ (NR1C2) has a ubiquitous expression pattern and plays a more general role in the activation of oxidative metabolism (Escher et al. 2001). PPARγ (NR1C3) plays a major role in the activation of adipocyte differentiation and is expressed in adipose tissue (Tontonoz et al. 1994). A broad range of endogenous molecules can act as agonists for the PPARs. These include a variety of unsaturated fatty acids, branched chain fatty acids, oxidized fatty acids eicosanoids, phospholipids and serotonin metabolites (Schupp and Lazar 2010). A number of synthetic ligands have also been identified for the different isoforms of PPARs (Grygiel-Gorniak 2014). PPARα ligands include fenofibrate, clofibrate and gemfibrozil; PPARβ/δ ligands include GW0742, GW501516 and GW9578; PPARγ ligands include rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, troglitazone, ciglitazone, farglitazar, S26948 and INT131.

XX. 4 LXRs and PPARs regulate inflammation

In addition to their role in reverse cholesterol transport, LXRs are important regulators of inflammatory gene expression and innate immunity. Regulation of inflammation by LXRs can be highlighted by reviewing previous studies demonstrating that LXR activation downregulates the expression of pro-inflammatory molecules, such as inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), IL-6, IL-1β, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), prostaglandin E2, and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) in cultured macrophages, and primary isolated microglia and astrocytes in response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation or bacterial infection (Castrillo and Tontonoz 2004; Rigamonti et al. 2008). LXR agonists can also attenuate inflammation through suppression of NF-κB DNA-binding activity, by blocking the degradation of IκB-α in LPS-stimulated microglia (Zhang-Gandhi and Drew 2007). Similarly, GW3965 attenuates LPS-induced inflammation in primary rat Kupffer cells through repression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and prostaglandin E2 (Wang et al. 2009). Another LXR agonist, T0901317, has been shown to downregulate interferon-γ (IFN-γ), TNF-α and IL-2 secretion by Th1 lymphocytes (Liu et al. 2012). Finally, LXR agonists have been shown to attenuate inflammatory responses in vivo, in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, and irritant and allergic contact dermatitis models (Hindinger et al. 2006; Cui et al. 2011).

PPARs, also important in maintaining lipid homeostasis through regulation of fatty acid metabolism, have been shown to be molecular mediators of inflammatory pathways. For example, PPARβ/δ-dependent repression of NF-κB/AP1 transcription represents a major mechanism of attenuating inflammation by PPARβ/δ agonists (Schnegg and Robbins 2011). PPARγ activation leads to protection against atherosclerosis through reduced expression of inflammatory markers such as TNF-α and MMP-9 in both macrophages and artery wall tissue samples (Chawla et al. 2001a). While, loss of PPARγ bone marrow expression was associated with a significant increase in atherosclerotic lesion development. It is important to note, that an alternative explanation of the anti-inflammatory and atheroprotective effects of PPARγ has been proposed and this involves its ability of PPAR to crosstalk and induce LXRα expression. This in turn can lead to induction of cholesterol efflux as well as attenuation of expression of pro-inflammatory molecules in macrophages (Chawla et al. 2001b). The ability of LXRs and PPARs to repress expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines provides us with a likely therapeutic target to attenuate inflammation and their harmful downstream effects.

XX.5 Rationale for studying the therapeutic potential of nuclear receptors in AMD

Morphological examinations of retinas from AMD patients have revealed the accumulation and retention of activated microglia within the outer nuclear layer as well as the sub-retinal space (Gupta et al. 2003). The presence of these immune cells in the outer retina may contribute to the initiation of AMD pathology. The convergence of these morphological studies of AMD tissue, and investigations of nuclear receptor regulation of inflammation in other diseases that share common pathogenic pathways with AMD, advocate the notion that reversal of age-related accumulation and influx of activated microglia modulated by nuclear receptors is a viable path to pursue to ameliorate the progression of AMD. Cellular targets for prevention and/or reversal of microglial influx may include the RPE, since RPE cells are critical in maintaining the immunosuppressive state and are contributors to local cytokine production and secretion. While the microglial cells, which in their activated state have been shown to be associated with drusenoid deposits as well as CNV lesions, would be potential targets for reversal of immune cell influx, serving as a therapeutic avenue for the treatment of both forms of late AMD. Most recently direct evidence for the use of LXR agonists in late AMD comes from studies, which have demonstrated that treatment with LXR agonists in an eye drop formulation is effective in reducing the severity of CNV lesions in an experimental model of wet AMD (Sene et al. 2013). Though throughout this review we have focused on the potential benefit of targeting nuclear receptors in decreasing inflammation, it is not trivial to note that, additionally, these ligands may also slow down AMD progression by regulating cholesterol and lipid homeostasis.

XX.6 Conclusions

In the healthy retina, microglia are excluded from the sub-retinal space. However, changes in the sub-retinal microenvironment and RPE due to aging results in invasion of the sub-retinal space by these immune cells, where they can tip the balance to a “pathological state” and contribute to the progression of AMD. Given the potential that activation of LXRs and PPARs can lead to a downregulation of pro-inflammatory signals, targeting these nuclear receptors appear to provide an important therapeutic opportunity to tip the balance back again to a homeostatic state and hopefully either delay the onset of AMD or slow down its progression.

Supplementary Material

Keywords

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to the funding agencies supporting our research endeavors: The International Retinal Research Foundation Loris and David Rich Post-doctoral Fellowship (MC), NEI EY02868 (GM), P30 EY05722, and a Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc. Sybil B. Harrington Scholar award (GM).

References

  1. Apfel R, Benbrook D, Lernhardt E, et al. A novel orphan receptor specific for a subset of thyroid hormone-responsive elements and its interaction with the retinoid/thyroid hormone receptor subfamily. Molecular and cellular biology. 1994;14:7025–7035. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.10.7025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berger J, Moller DE. The mechanisms of action of PPARs. Annual review of medicine. 2002;53:409–435. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.53.082901.104018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Castrillo A, Tontonoz P. Nuclear receptors in macrophage biology: at the crossroads of lipid metabolism and inflammation. Annual review of cell and developmental biology. 2004;20:455–480. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.012103.134432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chawla A, Barak Y, Nagy L, et al. PPAR-gamma dependent and independent effects on macrophage-gene expression in lipid metabolism and inflammation. Nature medicine. 2001a;7:48–52. doi: 10.1038/83336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chawla A, Boisvert WA, Lee CH, et al. A PPAR gamma-LXR-ABCA1 pathway in macrophages is involved in cholesterol efflux and atherogenesis. Molecular cell. 2001b;7:161–171. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00164-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Coleman HR, Chan CC, Ferris FL, 3rd, et al. Age-related macular degeneration. Lancet. 2008;372:1835–1845. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61759-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Combadiere C, Feumi C, Raoul W, et al. CX3CR1-dependent subretinal microglia cell accumulation is associated with cardinal features of age-related macular degeneration. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2007;117:2920–2928. doi: 10.1172/JCI31692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cui G, Qin X, Wu L, et al. Liver X receptor (LXR) mediates negative regulation of mouse and human Th17 differentiation. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2011;121:658–670. doi: 10.1172/JCI42974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dreyer C, Krey G, Keller H, et al. Control of the peroxisomal beta-oxidation pathway by a novel family of nuclear hormone receptors. Cell. 1992;68:879–887. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90031-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Escher P, Braissant O, Basu-Modak S, et al. Rat PPARs: quantitative analysis in adult rat tissues and regulation in fasting and refeeding. Endocrinology. 2001;142:4195–4202. doi: 10.1210/endo.142.10.8458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Grygiel-Gorniak B. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and their ligands: nutritional and clinical implications--a review. Nutrition journal. 2014;13:17. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-13-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gupta N, Brown KE, Milam AH. Activated microglia in human retinitis pigmentosa, late-onset retinal degeneration, and age-related macular degeneration. Experimental eye research. 2003;76:463–471. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4835(02)00332-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hindinger C, Hinton DR, Kirwin SJ, et al. Liver X receptor activation decreases the severity of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Journal of neuroscience research. 2006;84:1225–1234. doi: 10.1002/jnr.21038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Holtkamp GM, Kijlstra A, Peek R, et al. Retinal pigment epithelium-immune system interactions: cytokine production and cytokine-induced changes. Progress in retinal and eye research. 2001;20:29–48. doi: 10.1016/s1350-9462(00)00017-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jakobsson T, Treuter E, Gustafsson JA, et al. Liver X receptor biology and pharmacology: new pathways, challenges and opportunities. Trends in pharmacological sciences. 2012;33:394–404. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2012.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Karlstetter M, Langmann T. Microglia in the aging retina. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 2014;801:207–212. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3209-8_27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kliewer SA, Forman BM, Blumberg B, et al. Differential expression and activation of a family of murine peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1994;91:7355–7359. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.15.7355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Laffitte BA, Repa JJ, Joseph SB, et al. LXRs control lipid-inducible expression of the apolipoprotein E gene in macrophages and adipocytes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2001;98:507–512. doi: 10.1073/pnas.021488798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lehmann JM, Kliewer SA, Moore LB, et al. Activation of the nuclear receptor LXR by oxysterols defines a new hormone response pathway. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1997;272:3137–3140. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.6.3137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu Y, Qiu de K, Ma X. Liver X receptors bridge hepatic lipid metabolism and inflammation. Journal of digestive diseases. 2012;13:69–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-2980.2011.00554.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ng TF, Streilein JW. Light-induced migration of retinal microglia into the subretinal space. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:3301–3310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Patel M, Chan CC. Immunopathological aspects of age-related macular degeneration. Semin Immunopathol. 2008;30:97–110. doi: 10.1007/s00281-008-0112-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rigamonti E, Chinetti-Gbaguidi G, Staels B. Regulation of macrophage functions by PPAR-alpha, PPAR-gamma, and LXRs in mice and men. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2008;28:1050–1059. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.158998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schnegg CI, Robbins ME. Neuroprotective Mechanisms of PPARdelta: Modulation of Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Processes. PPAR research. 2011;2011:373560. doi: 10.1155/2011/373560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Schupp M, Lazar MA. Endogenous ligands for nuclear receptors: digging deeper. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2010;285:40409–40415. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R110.182451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sene A, Khan AA, Cox D, et al. Impaired cholesterol efflux in senescent macrophages promotes age-related macular degeneration. Cell metabolism. 2013;17:549–561. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Streilein JW, Ma N, Wenkel H, et al. Immunobiology and privilege of neuronal retina and pigment epithelium transplants. Vision research. 2002;42:487–495. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00185-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tontonoz P, Hu E, Spiegelman BM. Stimulation of adipogenesis in fibroblasts by PPAR gamma 2, a lipid-activated transcription factor. Cell. 1994;79:1147–1156. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90006-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tuo J, Bojanowski CM, Zhou M, et al. Murine ccl2/cx3cr1 deficiency results in retinal lesions mimicking human age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:3827–3836. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-0051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Viennois E, Pommier AJ, Mouzat K, et al. Targeting liver X receptors in human health: deadlock or promising trail? Expert opinion on therapeutic targets. 2011;15:219–232. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2011.547853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang YY, Dahle MK, Steffensen KR, et al. Liver X receptor agonist GW3965 dose-dependently regulates lps-mediated liver injury and modulates posttranscriptional TNF-alpha production and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in liver macrophages. Shock. 2009;32:548–553. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3181a47f85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zamiri P, Sugita S, Streilein JW. Immunosuppressive properties of the pigmented epithelial cells and the subretinal space. Chem Immunol Allergy. 2007;92:86–93. doi: 10.1159/000099259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhang-Gandhi CX, Drew PD. Liver X receptor and retinoid X receptor agonists inhibit inflammatory responses of microglia and astrocytes. Journal of neuroimmunology. 2007;183:50–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2006.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Keywords

RESOURCES