Abstract
Osteoporosis is characterized by low bone mass and compromised trabecular architecture, and is commonly occurred in post-menopausal women with estrogen deficiency. In addition, prolonged mechanical unloading, i.e., long term bed rest, can exaggerate the bone loss. Sclerostin is a Wnt signaling antagonist and acts as a negative regulator of bone formation. A sclerostin-neutralizing antibody (Scl-Ab) increased bone mineral density in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis and healthy men. The objective of this study is to characterize the condition of bone loss in ovariectomized (OVX) rats with concurrent mechanical unloading and evaluate the effect of sclerostin antibody treatment in mitigating the prospective severe bone loss conditions in this model. Four-month-old OVX- or sham-operated female SD rats were used in this study. They were subjected to functional disuse induced by hind-limb suspension (HLS) or free ambulance after 2 days of arrival. Subcutaneous injections with either vehicle or Scl-Ab at 25mg/kg were made twice per week for 5 weeks from the time of HLS. μCT analyses demonstrated a significant decrease in distal metaphyseal trabecular architecture integrity with HLS, OVX and HLS+OVX (Bone volume fraction decreased by 29%, 71% and 87% respectively). The significant improvement of various trabecular bone parameters (Bone volume fraction increased by 111%, 229% and 297% respectively as compared with placebo group) with the administration of Scl-Ab are associated with stronger mechanical property and increased bone formation by histomorphometry. These results together indicate that Scl-Ab prevented the loss of trabecular bone mass and cortical bone strength in OVX rat model with concurrent mechanical unloading. The data suggested that monoclonal sclerostin-neutralizing antibody represents a promising therapeutic approach for severe osteoporosis induced by estrogen deficiency with concurrent mechanical unloading.
Keywords: severe osteoporosis, mechanical unloading, post-menopause, sclerostin antibody, histomorphometry
Introduction
Osteoporosis is characterized by compromised bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration [1–3]. Currently, it is estimated to affect more than 10 million Americans, cause about 1.5 million osteoporotic fractures each year and put an estimated 44 million Americans at risk, which exerts an extensive financial burden on the healthcare system with a direct annual medical cost of around 20 billion dollars[4]. With the growth of aging population, the incidence of osteoporosis and prevalence of osteoporotic fractures is expected to increase dramatically [5–8].
Significant bone loss related to mechanical disuse or loss of weight bearing in prolonged bed-ridden patients represents a critical issue [9–11]. Numerous biochemical parameters showed uncoupling between bone resorption and formation markers as well as an increased number of osteoclasts and enlarged resorption cavities in histomorphometric studies in prolonged immobilized subjects [10, 12, 13]. A considerable imbalance between bone formation and resorption induced by abrupt decline of ovarian production of estrogen in post-menopausal women represents another primary cause of the condition of osteoporosis [14]. Women over 50 years of age have also been reported as the most sedentary group of the adult populations [15]. Lack of mechanical stress and physical loading deteriorates bone integrity as exercise was proved to be beneficial to preserve bone mineral density (BMD) and prevent bone loss conditions [16, 17]. The two risk factors above expose elderly female to greater risk of osteoporosis and fractures. Therefore, It is highly clinically relevant to examine the severe osteoporosis condition due to estrogen deficiency accompanied by concurrent mechanical unloading where more rapid and devastating bone mass deterioration is present, in conditions such as post-menopausal women who are confined to bed after the onset of stroke or accidents [10, 18] and a better understanding of the interactions of the two risk factors may help lead to a better prevention and treatment of the disease.
Sclerostin, an osteocyte-expressed glycoprotein encoded by SOST gene, acts as a negative regulator of bone formation by antagonizing Wnt/β catenin signaling [2, 19–22]. Both extended immobilization and condition of post-menopause has been related to an increase of sclerostin serum levels [10, 22, 23]. Patients with homozygous inactivation mutation of SOST gene develops sclerosteosis, a rare genetic disorder characterized by undetectable level of serum sclerostin, very high bone mass phenotype and nerve entrapment due to excessive bone formation. Individuals with heterozygous carriers for the mutation had increased bone mineral density and lower risk of fractures. This discovery has led to the hypothesis that sclerostin neutralizing agents might mimic the heterozygous carrier condition and be efficacious in reversing bone loss in osteoporosis [24–26]. Targeted deletion of SOST gene in mice resulted in increased bone formation, bone mass and bone strength whereas overexpression of SOST leads to an osteoporotic phenotype in mice [11, 19, 21, 27].
It has been the emphasis of multiple recent studies to target Wnt/β catenin signaling pathway to promote bone formation [11, 19, 28]. Using monoclonal antibody to inhibit sclerostin seems to be a very promising strategy in that SOST is almost exclusively expressed in osteocytes [29, 30]. Sclerostin- neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (Scl-Ab) has been tested in disuse-induced and OVX-induced osteoporosis animal models. In a right hind-limb-immobilization female rat model, histomorphometric data showed that Scl-Ab mediated blockade of sclerostin dramatically enhanced bone formation with an increased bone mass and reduced bone resorption [31]. In an aged OVX female rat model simulating postmenopausal osteoporosis, twice per week subcutaneous Scl-Ab injection at 25mg/kg was administered for 5 weeks. Micro-CT and histomorphometry data exhibited significant increases in bone formation and bone mass comparing to the placebo groups. These changes together with improved stiffness and maximum load data obtained from destructive four-point bending tests indicate an improved skeletal strength [2].
All the evidences above consolidate the notion that Scl-Ab -mediated blockade of sclerostin represents a promising therapeutic approach for the treatment of osteoporosis induced by either immobilization or post-menopause. However, little is known about the effect of prolonged and severe osteopenia in bone loss induced by concurrent mechanical unloading and OVX. The efficacy of Scl-Ab in rats suffered from severe osteoporosis with presence of both prolonged immobilization and estrogen deficiency is yet to be determined. The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of Scl-Ab in a severe progressive bone loss from combined estrogen deficiency and functional immobilization, such as under OVX with concurrent hindlimb suspension disuse in a rat model. Bone volume fraction, mechanical strength, bone formation rate, and plasma formation/resorption markers in such severe osteopenia and osteoporosis conditions were examined.
Materials and Methods
All experimental procedures with the described animal models were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Stony Brook University.
Animals
Seventy-seven 4-month-old female Sprague-Dawley rats (Charles River, Wilmington, MA) weighing an average of 327±35g were purchased at 4-month of age and housed individually in a temperature-controlled animal facility with a 12:12 hour light:dark cycle at Stony Brook University. They were allowed free access to chow diet and water. Thirty-three rats that had undergone ovariectomy surgery and forty-four rats that had undergone sham surgery (Sham) 10 days before the arrival were subject to either functional disuse or free ambulance after 2 days of acclamation. Functional disuse was induced by HLS where the immobilization was realized by a tail harness device attached to tail that had been cleaned with 70% isopropanol and briefly coated with benzoin. The other end of the harness was attached to a swivel apparatus that was suspended from the roof of the cage. Due to an approximate 30° head-down tilt, the hind-limbs of the animals were prevented from touching the ground of the cage at all time during the experiment, while free ambulance of forelimbs was allowed [32, 33]. All animals were checked twice a day to monitor their health conditions and their weights throughout the study.
Scl-Ab treatment
The animals were divided into 7 groups with n=11 per group: (1) Sham+Veh, (2) Sham+HLS+Veh, (3) Sham+HLS+Scl-Ab, (4) OVX+Veh, (5) OVX+Scl-Ab, (6) OVX+HLS+Veh, (7) OVX+HLS+Scl-Ab. Group 1, 2, 4 and 6 were injected with Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS) subcutaneously twice per week for 5 weeks while Group 3,5 and 7 were injected with a sclerostin monoclonal antibody (Scl-Ab; Amgen, Thousand Oak, CA, USA) at 25mg/kg at the same frequency and duration [34, 35]. The treatment of either vehicle or Scl-Ab started at the time that is approximately 2 weeks after sham or OVX surgery. The antibody was shipped to Stony Brook University on dry ice from Amgen and stored in −80 °C until thawed for making injection solution.
μCT analysis
After five weeks of study, animals under isoflurane anesthesia were euthanized via cervical dislocation to ensure rapid euthanasia. Both right and left hind-limbs of rats from all the groups were harvested and preserved in 70% EtOH at −20 °C. A high resolution μCT scanner (μCT-40, SCANCO Medical AG, Bassersdorf, Switzerland) was adopted for scanning distal portion of right femurs with a spatial resolution of 15 μm and a specific Gaussian sigma, support and lower threshold of 0.5, 1 and 330 for defining analyzed objects and image smoothing purpose. One 750 μm region of trabecular bone that was 300 μm proximal to the epiphyseal plate of distal femur was chosen as the area of interest. Bone volume fraction (BV/TV, given as %), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th, mm) and structure model index (SMI) were evaluated for the trabecular region.
Mechanical Testing
Mechanical testing was performed by 4-point bending on the mid-shaft of right femur, which produces stress between two upper loading points while the lower two points serve as support. Servo hydraulic MTS 858 Mini Bionix frame (MTS Systems, Eden Prairie, MN, USA) was adopted to perform the bending. Specimens were placed on the frame horizontally with mid-shaft of the diaphysis facing to the notch in the same position and orientation in order to minimize the variation. The rate of displacement was set to be 1mm/min with a preload of 1 N and the bending was imposed on specimen continuously until fracture occurred [36]. The maximal load and the curve of load-displacement were monitored. Based on the load-displacement curve plotted, the maximum bending force applied until fracture was recorded as ultimate force (N) and slope of the linear portion that represents material elasticity was used to calculate stiffness (kN/mm) [37].
Histomorphometry
All rats were subject to two subcutaneous calcein (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., St.Louis, MO, USA) injections at 15mg/kg 3 days and 13 days before euthanasia. After μCT scanning and 4 point bending, the distal portions of right femurs were cut against fractures made by mechanical test and subsequently dissected into two equal-size halves along the sagittal plane by using low speed diamond wheel saw (South Bay Technology, Inc., San Clemente, CA, USA). The lateral sides of distal femurs were saved for future studies while the medial sides were dehydrated with isopropanol and used for histomorphometry. The samples were then infiltrated and embedded with a mixture of methyl methacrylate, di-butyl phthalate and benzoyl peroxide. After the media were cured, longitudinal slices were sectioned to 5 μm using a Leica 2165 microtome (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). The region of interest encompasses the trabecular area that was scanned by μCT system earlier. A section area of approximately 0.6 mm2 at metaphyseal area of the bone was examined by using the Osteomeasure software (OsteoMetrics Inc., Decatur, GA, USA) to trace the calcein label in the trabecular bone under fluorescent microscope. Histomorphometric bone volume fraction (aBV/TV, %), trabecular thickness (aTb.Th, μm), mineralizing surface/bone surface (MS/BS, %), mineral apposition rate (MAR, um/day) and bone formation rate (BRF/BS, μm3/μm2/yr) were evaluated.
ELISA analysis of resorption marker
Blood samples were obtained from the caudal vein of animals under anesthesia at week 5 during sacrifice for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP 5b) testing. All the samples were kept in 1.5ml Eppendorf tubes that had been pre-washed with heparin. Plasma samples were obtained by centrifuging the blood samples at a speed of 3000rpm at 4°C. Plasma aliquots were then stored at −80°C. Plasma bone turnover marker (BTM) level of TRACP 5b were examined and quantified by adopting immunological assay (IDS Inc., Scottsdale, AZ). All testing was performed according to manufacturer’s protocols.
Statistical analysis
All the results were reported as mean±SD for all of the analysis. μCT, histomorphometry and bone turnover marker data were all evaluated by using GraphPad Prism software (Version 5.01, GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s pairwise multiple comparison tests were performed on all data from the distal femur metaphysis. The level of significant differences between two groups was identified by using a p value of less than 0.05.
Results
μCT
As shown in Figure 1a and 1b, μCT analysis of the metaphyseal region of distal femur revealed 5 weeks of mechanical unloading alone resulted in 29% loss in trabecular bone volume compared to sham control. Vehicle-treated OVX rats had a significant 71% decrease in BV/TV. OVX rats with concurrent HLS resulted in an even greater bone loss of 87%, representing a severe bone loss condition. Scl-Ab treatment showed a counteractive effect on bone mass loss. Scl-Ab treatment was associated with significantly greater BV/TV with an increase of 111% and 229% in HLS and OVX rats compared with respective control. Even greater increase in BV/TV (297%) was found in OVX + HLS group (Figure. 1b), likely due to extremely low BV/TV in vehicle-treated OVX + HLS rats. Tb.Th did not change significantly in rats with either HLS alone or OVX alone, however, rats with concurrent OVX and HLS showed a significant decrease of Tb.Th (−26%) (Figure. 1c). Scl-Ab administration significantly improved Tb.Th to similar extent in HLS, OVX and OVX+HLS rats compared with respective vehicle control (88%, 87% and 97% respectively). Structure model index (SMI) (Figure. 1d) was significantly greater in HLS alone group, OVX alone group as well as OVX+HLS group (+73%, +129% and +184%, respectively) compared with sham control. In rats treated with Scl-Ab, SMI was significantly lower (−396%, −159% and −46%) in all three conditions compared with respective controls.
Mechanical Testing
Four-point bending test demonstrated that HLS alone or OVX+HLS were associated with significantly lower stiffness as compared with Sham controls (−23% and −29% respectively) (Figure. 2a). In Scl-Ab treated groups, stiffness was significantly greater in all 3 conditions (+31%, +32% and +57%, respectively) compared with respective controls. Ultimate load was not significantly lower in HLS, OVX or OVX plus HLS as compared with Sham controls, but it was significantly greater in Scl-Ab-treated HLS or OVX rats as compared with respective vehicle controls and sham group (Figure. 2b).
Histomorphometry
Figure. 3f shows the representative images of calcein labeled trabecular bone. The data of histomorphometric analysis of distal femoral metaphysis trabecular bone is presented in Figure. 3a–3e. OVX alone had significant decrease of BV/TV at −36% in comparison to sham control. HLS plus OVX showed greater bone loss (−71%) than HLS alone and OVX alone. Scl-Ab treatment significantly preserved bone mass in all three conditions. Similar trend was observed in Tb.Th. These results are generally consistent with μCT analysis. MS/BS was significantly greater in three Scl-Ab treated groups compared with respective controls. MAR and BFR/BS were significantly greater in Scl-Ab treated OVX rats with or without HLS compared with respective controls.
ELISA analysis of resorption marker
Bone turnover marker levels normalized to age match control are shown as percentage difference in Figure. 4. At the end of the study, plasma TRACP 5b level in the Sham+HLS+Scl-Ab rats were significantly reduced relative to that in the corresponding Sham+HLS+Veh rats. TRACP 5b level in OVX+Veh rats showed a decreasing trend as compared with that in the age-match control rats. Scl-Ab treatment in OVX animals failed to recover this trend. TRACP 5b level in OVX+HLS+Veh rats at sacrifice was at similar level relative to that in the age-match control animals, while administration of Scl-Ab in OVX+HLS rats maintained this trend.
Discussion
We used concurrent mechanical unloading in addition to OVX to study the effect of severe bone loss. The HLS animals and OVX animals used in this study developed substantial bone loss condition. Remarkably, the HLS+OVX animals were significantly more osteoporotic resulting from the additive effect of concurrent mechanical unloading and ovariectomy with 87% of bone loss compared to age-match control group. In this study, Scl-Ab is proposed as a therapeutic bone anabolic agent for treatment of bone loss based on its effectiveness in previous bone loss animal studies and human clinical trials [31, 38]. Beyond the fact that our data indicated that short-term administration (5-week) of Scl-Ab resulted in complete reversal of the bone loss condition induced by prolonged mechanical unloading or OVX surgery, bone mass and mechanical parameters were further increased to levels greater than age-match controls as also evidenced in previous studies [2]. Whereas in the severe osteoporosis model introduced by concurrent mechanical immobilization and deficiency of estrogen, Scl-Ab was able to partially mitigate the deterioration of trabecular bone architecture and morphology as well as maintain mechanical robustness. SMI, which measures trabecular concavity, serves as an indirect method to provide indication of plate- or rod-like trabecular bone microstructure and an important predictor of fracture [39]. The SMI value usually ranged from 0 to 3, where 0 stands for an ideal plate structure while 3 stands for and ideal rod structure. Values between 0 and 3 corresponds to trabecular structures with different ratios of rod and plate structure [40]. The data of SMI strongly suggested that by HLS alone, OVX alone or HLS+OVX, geometry of trabeculae shift towards a more rod-like structure, while subcutaneous injection of Scl-Ab totally reversed the trend in HLS alone group and OVX alone group. HLS+Scl-Ab showed an even more significant plate-like geometry compared to the age-match control group, suggesting a less vulnerability to fractures. In the OVX+HLS induced severe osteoporosis, Scl-Ab moderately alleviated the condition by shifting the trabeculae towards a more plate-like geometry.
In addition to the diminished bone volume fraction and trabecular thickness in the severe osteoporosis scenario, OVX + HLS rats also had a jeopardized mechanical property, such as lower stiffness and ultimate load, which might be accounted by the thinning of cortical shell and reduced cortical bone volume (data not shown). The considerable improvement of the related parameters by short term administration of Scl-Ab to OVX+HLS rats could be rendered noticeable gain in whole bone strength at femoral diaphysis. This finding is divergent from previous study by Tian et. al, who stated that the lag of cortical response is hard to overcome by a short term treatment of Scl-Ab for 4 weeks after they found insignificant cortical histomorphometry response. In depth morphological and structural cortical bone studies will be needed to further characterize the tissue level changes of cortical bone and provide an explanation for the changes of the mechanical property changes seen in both untreated and Scl-Ab treated animals.
Histomorphometric analysis showed that 2D bone volume fraction as well as 2D trabecular thickness changed in parallel with μCT results. Trabecular bone volume and trabecular bone thickness were dramatically decreased in severe osteoporosis model. Scl-Ab treatment in severe osteoporosis scenario significantly mitigated bone mass loss condition and totally reversed the bone thinning by surpassing the original Tb.Th level. Similar to previous rat studies [2, 41], Scl-Ab treated groups showed significant increase in key bone formation indices (MS/BS, MAR and BFR/BS) as compared to respective control. The observed increases in MS/BS suggest that sclerostin neutralizing resulted in a more robust bone mineralizing activity on trabecular surface. BFR/BS is significantly elevated in HLS or OVX treated with Scl-Ab whereas HLS+OVX treated with Scl-Ab shares a similar trend. Not surprisingly, in parallel with the robust bone morphologic parameters, BFR/BS in Scl-Ab treated animals is significantly elevated as compared to respective control, indicating an active bone matrix mineral deposition and osteoblast activity. In previous studies, compared to the consistent effect of Scl-Ab on osteoblast activities, the effect of Scl-Ab on bone resorption remains inconsistent (Ke, et al., Endocrine Review, 2012).
TRACP 5b, mainly produced by osteoclast and abundant in osteoclast cytoplasm [42], is well known as a bone resorption marker. In our present study, with 5 weeks administration of Scl-Ab, the plasma TRACP 5b value significantly decreased in Sham+HLS rats, indicating Scl-Ab preserved bone volume via both pro-anabolic and anti-catabolic responses in mechanical unloaded rats. This result is supported by previous studies, where Shahnazari, et al. showed that Scl-Ab maintained the bone osteoclast surface while reduced serum concentration of TRACP 5b in mechanically unloaded animals [11]. There was no significant change of TRACP 5b value in OVX alone animals regardless of the treatment. As the plasma TRACP 5b levels is basically a reflection of osteoclast numbers rather than osteoclast activity [43, 44], the insignificant decrease of TRACP 5b in OVX+Veh rats is thought to be due to the significant loss of bone volume as evidenced in micro CT and histomorphometry. In a similar long term study of Scl-Ab using OVX model, Li X et al. observed that in OVX animals, the TRACP 5b level had a decreasing trend as compared with Sham controls at week 6 [45]. In the OVX+HLS+Veh animals, TRACP 5b level showed a slight decrease as compared to age-match control rats. This result was supported by an earlier study using the combination of OVX and concurrent mechanical unloading via sciatic neurectomy [46], in which Sun et al. observed a significantly lower serum TRACP 5b level at week 2 following OVX surgery as compared with control group. However by week 4, the TRACP 5b level trended back to normal control level, which is thought to be correlated with the non-persistent bone loss profiles between Week 2 and 4 [47]. Interestingly, Scl-Ab administration for 5 weeks in OVX+HLS rats did not exert significant changes on TRACP 5b level, indicating the osteoclast number was not increased despite the significant increase in BV/TV as evidenced by micro CT and histomorphometry data, which may imply the role of Scl-Ab in inhibiting osteoclast activity by suppressing osteoclast number in concurrent mechanical unloading and estrogen deficient rat model. Histomorphometry analysis of total number of osteoclasts by TRAP staining will be needed in the future to further verify this hypothesis. It is also possible that Scl-Ab may regulate osteoclast activities due to its ability to antagonize sclerostin, which has been reported to be able to increase osteoclast recruitment and activity [48, 49].
The mechanism of action and regulation of sclerostin as a negative regulator of bone formation is yet to be fully understood [50]. It is currently believed that sclerostin, an osteocytes exclusive glycoprotein, blocks the activation of Wnt signaling pathway by binding to low-density lipoprotein receptor-related proteins 5 and 6 (LRP5 and LRP6) that mediate the regulation of Wnt signaling [20, 51], which in turn interferes the Wnt signaling by antagonizing the survival and promotional effects on mesenchymal stem cells of the osteoblastic lineage [22, 52, 53]. Numerous factors have been associated with SOST expression by osteocytes as well as its serum level, among which bone mechanical loading is suggested to be one crucial regulator. Osteocytes have been recently suggested to be the proximate cell population that is responsible for mechanotransduction as targeted ablation of osteocytes resulted in osteoporosis with mechanotransduction dysfunction [47]. Absence of mechanical loading by immobilization results in higher SOST levels and down regulation of Wnt signaling, thus directly links to disuse osteoporosis. Sex steroid hormone, especially estrogen, is another important relevant regulator of SOST level. Post-menopausal women have higher serum sclerostin level compared to pre-menopausal women. In post-menopausal women, sclerostin level is inversely related to the free estrogen index (FEI), which suggests that sclerostin level is directly suppressed by estrogens [54, 55]. However mechanism of the regulation and a complete characterization of the pathway are still under continuous study.
In summary, this 5-week study demonstrated that both lack of mechanical stimulation and OVX resulted in significant bone loss in metaphyseal region and weakened mechanical properties in mid-shaft of the femur whereas OVX with concurrent mechanical unloading lead to more advanced trabecular microarchitecture deterioration as well as further compromised mechanical properties. With short-term pharmacologic inhibition of sclerostin by using neutralizing Scl-Ab, bone mass and strength were significantly improved and normalized to or beyond age-match control level. Scl-Ab prevented trabecular bone loss in HLS-induced, OVX-induced as well as HLS+OVX induced osteoporosis. These results suggest that monoclonal sclerostin-neutralizing antibody represents a promising anabolic therapeutic approach for severe osteoporosis induced by estrogen deficiency with concurrent mechanical unloading. Potential application of the agent may have a great impact on elderly female population with reduced physical activities.
Highlights.
We used novel concurrent mechanical unloading in addition to OVX to characterize the effect of severe bone loss condition.
Our study is highly clinical relevant and associated closely with post-menopause cohorts who are mechanically immobilized due to diseases or accidents.
HLS+OVX animals were significantly more osteoporotic resulting from the additive effect of concurrent mechanical unloading and ovariectomy.
With short-term inhibition of sclerostin by using Scl-Ab, bone mass and strength were significantly improved and normalized to or beyond age-match control level.
Scl-Ab prevented trabecular bone loss in HLS-induced, OVX-induced as well as HLS+OVX induced osteoporosis.
Acknowledgments
This work is kindly supported by the National Institute of Health (R01 AR52379 and R01 AR61821), the US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, and by the Amgen, Inc. The authors thank Amgen, Inc. for providing Scl-Ab. The authors would also like to thank all the members in the Orthopaedic Bioengineering Research Lab at Stony Brook University and labs in the Department of Biomedical Engineering, particularly to Dr. Wei Yin for assistance in tissue turnover marker analysis, and Alyssa Tuthill for assistance in animal experiment.
Footnotes
No supplemental data has been included with the submission
Disclosure
Xiaodong Li and Hua Zhu Ke has/had employment at Amgen, Inc.
Authors’ roles: This study was conceived by HZK, XL and YXQ. MH performed part of the animal study jointly with DZ. TC was responsible for trabecular bone histomorphometry sectioning and contouring. LL helped with MTS system setting. JW helped with quantification of PINP and TRACP immunoassays. DZ performed animal studies, extraction of tissue samples, μCT analysis, histomorphometry analysis, mechanical bending test and immunoassay analysis. Data was analyzed and interpreted by DZ. The draft manuscript was generated by DZ and revised by each author, particularly by MH, XL and YXQ. The draft manuscript was finally approved by YXQ.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Lin C, Jiang X, Dai Z, Guo X, Weng T, Wang J, Li Y, Feng G, Gao X, He L. Sclerostin mediates bone response to mechanical unloading through antagonizing Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;24:1651–61. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.090411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Li X, Ominsky MS, Warmington KS, Morony S, Gong J, Cao J, Gao Y, Shalhoub V, Tipton B, Haldankar R, Chen Q, Winters A, Boone T, Geng Z, Niu QT, Ke HZ, Kostenuik PJ, Simonet WS, Lacey DL, Paszty C. Sclerostin antibody treatment increases bone formation, bone mass, and bone strength in a rat model of postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;24:578–88. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.081206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.de Souza RA, Xavier M, da Silva FF, de Souza MT, Tosato MG, Martin AA, Castilho JC, Ribeiro W, Silveira L., Jr Influence of creatine supplementation on bone quality in the ovariectomized rat model: an FT-Raman spectroscopy study. Lasers Med Sci. 2012;27:487–95. doi: 10.1007/s10103-011-0976-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sunyecz JA. The use of calcium and vitamin D in the management of osteoporosis. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2008;4:827–36. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.s3552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cauley JA. Public Health Impact of Osteoporosis. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013 doi: 10.1093/gerona/glt093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Becker DJ, Kilgore ML, Morrisey MA. The societal burden of osteoporosis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2010;12:186–91. doi: 10.1007/s11926-010-0097-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis-Related Fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2007;22:465–475. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.061113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Das S, Crockett JC. Osteoporosis - a current view of pharmacological prevention and treatment. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2013;7:435–48. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S31504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bikle DD, Halloran BP. The response of bone to unloading. J Bone Miner Metab. 1999;17:233–44. doi: 10.1007/s007740050090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gaudio A, Pennisi P, Bratengeier C, Torrisi V, Lindner B, Mangiafico RA, Pulvirenti I, Hawa G, Tringali G, Fiore CE. Increased sclerostin serum levels associated with bone formation and resorption markers in patients with immobilization-induced bone loss. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:2248–53. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-0067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shahnazari M, Wronski T, Chu V, Williams A, Leeper A, Stolina M, Ke HZ, Halloran B. Early response of bone marrow osteoprogenitors to skeletal unloading and sclerostin antibody. Calcif Tissue Int. 2012;91:50–8. doi: 10.1007/s00223-012-9610-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vico L, Chappard D, Alexandre C, Palle S, Minaire P, Riffat G, Morukov B, Rakhmanov S. Effects of a 120 day period of bed-rest on bone mass and bone cell activities in man: attempts at countermeasure. Bone Miner. 1987;2:383–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fiore CE, Pennisi P, Ciffo F, Scebba C, Amico A, Di Fazzio S. Immobilization-dependent bone collagen breakdown appears to increase with time: evidence for a lack of new bone equilibrium in response to reduced load during prolonged bed rest. Horm Metab Res. 1999;31:31–6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-978693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Raisz LG, Prestwood KM. Epidemiology and pathogenesis of osteoporosis. Clin Cornerstone. 2000;2:1–10. doi: 10.1016/s1098-3597(00)90001-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.King AC, Rejeski WJ, Buchner DM. Physical activity interventions targeting older adults. A critical review and recommendations. Am J Prev Med. 1998;15:316–33. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00085-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Karlsson M. Has exercise an antifracture efficacy in women? Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2004;14:2–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2003.00322.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zernicke R, MacKay C, Lorincz C. Mechanisms of bone remodeling during weight-bearing exercise. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2006;31:655–60. doi: 10.1139/h06-051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tou JC, Foley A, Yuan YV, Arnaud S, Wade CE, Brown M. The effect of ovariectomy combined with hindlimb unloading and reloading on the long bones of mature Sprague-Dawley rats. Menopause. 2008;15:494–502. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e318148bbad. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kim BJ, Bae SJ, Lee SY, Lee YS, Baek JE, Park SY, Lee SH, Koh JM, Kim GS. TNF-alpha mediates the stimulation of sclerostin expression in an estrogen-deficient condition. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;424:170–5. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.06.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Li X, Zhang Y, Kang H, Liu W, Liu P, Zhang J, Harris SE, Wu D. Sclerostin binds to LRP5/6 and antagonizes canonical Wnt signaling. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:19883–7. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413274200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Winkler DG, Sutherland MK, Geoghegan JC, Yu C, Hayes T, Skonier JE, Shpektor D, Jonas M, Kovacevich BR, Staehling-Hampton K, Appleby M, Brunkow ME, Latham JA. Osteocyte control of bone formation via sclerostin, a novel BMP antagonist. EMBO J. 2003;22:6267–76. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rossini M, Gatti D, Adami S. Involvement of WNT/beta-catenin Signaling in the Treatment of Osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int. 2013;93:121–32. doi: 10.1007/s00223-013-9749-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Spatz JM, Fields EE, Yu EW, Divieti Pajevic P, Bouxsein ML, Sibonga JD, Zwart SR, Smith SM. Serum sclerostin increases in healthy adult men during bed rest. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:E1736–40. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-1579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lewiecki EM. Sclerostin: a novel target for intervention in the treatment of osteoporosis. Discov Med. 2011;12:263–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Qin LJ, Ding DX, Cui LL, Huang QY. Expression and regulation of the SOST gene. Yi Chuan. 2013;35:939–47. doi: 10.3724/sp.j.1005.2013.00939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.van Dinther M, Zhang J, Weidauer SE, Boschert V, Muth EM, Knappik A, de Gorter DJ, van Kasteren PB, Frisch C, Mueller TD, ten Dijke P. Anti-Sclerostin antibody inhibits internalization of Sclerostin and Sclerostin-mediated antagonism of Wnt/LRP6 signaling. PLoS One. 2013;8:e62295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Li X, Ominsky MS, Niu QT, Sun N, Daugherty B, D’Agostin D, Kurahara C, Gao Y, Cao J, Gong J, Asuncion F, Barrero M, Warmington K, Dwyer D, Stolina M, Morony S, Sarosi I, Kostenuik PJ, Lacey DL, Simonet WS, Ke HZ, Paszty C. Targeted deletion of the sclerostin gene in mice results in increased bone formation and bone strength. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23:860–9. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.080216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Padhi D, Jang G, Stouch B, Fang L, Posvar E. Single-dose, placebo-controlled, randomized study of AMG 785, a sclerostin monoclonal antibody. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26:19–26. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Poole KE, van Bezooijen RL, Loveridge N, Hamersma H, Papapoulos SE, Lowik CW, Reeve J. Sclerostin is a delayed secreted product of osteocytes that inhibits bone formation. FASEB J. 2005;19:1842–4. doi: 10.1096/fj.05-4221fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.van Bezooijen RL, ten Dijke P, Papapoulos SE, Lowik CW. SOST/sclerostin, an osteocyte-derived negative regulator of bone formation. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2005;16:319–27. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2005.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tian X, Jee WS, Li X, Paszty C, Ke HZ. Sclerostin antibody increases bone mass by stimulating bone formation and inhibiting bone resorption in a hindlimb-immobilization rat model. Bone. 2011;48:197–201. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lam H, Qin YX. The effects of frequency-dependent dynamic muscle stimulation on inhibition of trabecular bone loss in a disuse model. Bone. 2008;43:1093–100. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.07.253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hu M, Cheng J, Qin YX. Dynamic hydraulic flow stimulation on mitigation of trabecular bone loss in a rat functional disuse model. Bone. 2012;51:819–25. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.06.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chen H, Xu X, Liu M, Zhang W, Ke HZ, Qin A, Tang T, Lu E. Sclerostin antibody treatment causes greater alveolar crest height and bone mass in an ovariectomized rat model of localized periodontitis. Bone. 2015;76:141–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Stolina M, Dwyer D, Niu QT, Villasenor KS, Kurimoto P, Grisanti M, Han CY, Liu M, Li X, Ominsky MS, Ke HZ, Kostenuik PJ. Temporal changes in systemic and local expression of bone turnover markers during six months of sclerostin antibody administration to ovariectomized rats. Bone. 2014;67:305–13. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.07.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Korres N, Tsiridis E, Pavlou G, Mitsoudis A, Perrea DN, Zoumbos AB. Biomechanical characteristics of bone in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats: An in-vivo randomized controlled experimental study. World J Orthop. 2013;4:124–9. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v4.i3.124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Turner CH, Burr DB. Basic biomechanical measurements of bone: a tutorial. Bone. 1993;14:595–608. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(93)90081-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Spatz JM, Ellman R, Cloutier AM, Louis L, van Vliet M, Suva LJ, Dwyer D, Stolina M, Ke HZ, Bouxsein ML. Sclerostin antibody inhibits skeletal deterioration due to reduced mechanical loading. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28:865–74. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Melton LJ, 3rd, Christen D, Riggs BL, Achenbach SJ, Muller R, van Lenthe GH, Amin S, Atkinson EJ, Khosla S. Assessing forearm fracture risk in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2010;21:1161–9. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-1047-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hildebrand T, Ruegsegger P. Quantification of Bone Microarchitecture with the Structure Model Index. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 1997;1:15–23. doi: 10.1080/01495739708936692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Li X, Warmington KS, Niu QT, Asuncion FJ, Barrero M, Grisanti M, Dwyer D, Stouch B, Thway TM, Stolina M, Ominsky MS, Kostenuik PJ, Simonet WS, Paszty C, Ke HZ. Inhibition of sclerostin by monoclonal antibody increases bone formation, bone mass, and bone strength in aged male rats. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25:2647–56. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Janckila AJ, Parthasarathy RN, Parthasarathy LK, Seelan RS, Hsueh YC, Rissanen J, Alatalo SL, Halleen JM, Yam LT. Properties and expression of human tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5a by monocyte-derived cells. J Leukoc Biol. 2005;77:209–18. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0504287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Rissanen JP, Suominen MI, Peng Z, Halleen JM. Secreted tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b is a Marker of osteoclast number in human osteoclast cultures and the rat ovariectomy model. Calcif Tissue Int. 2008;82:108–15. doi: 10.1007/s00223-007-9091-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Alatalo SL, Halleen JM, Hentunen TA, Monkkonen J, Vaananen HK. Rapid screening method for osteoclast differentiation in vitro that measures tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b activity secreted into the culture medium. Clin Chem. 2000;46:1751–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Li X, Ominsky MS, Warmington KS, Niu QT, Asuncion FJ, Barrero M, Dwyer D, Grisanti M, Stolina M, Kostenuik PJ, Simonet WS, Paszty C, Ke HZ. Increased bone formation and bone mass induced by sclerostin antibody is not affected by pretreatment or cotreatment with alendronate in osteopenic, ovariectomized rats. Endocrinology. 2011;152:3312–22. doi: 10.1210/en.2011-0252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sun X, Liang J, Wang C, Cao S, Hu Y, Xu X. Transient Effect of 17beta-estradiol on Osteoporosis in Ovariectomized Rats Accompanied with Unilateral Disuse in the Early Phase. Int J Med Sci. 2015;12:423–31. doi: 10.7150/ijms.11887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Tatsumi S, Ishii K, Amizuka N, Li M, Kobayashi T, Kohno K, Ito M, Takeshita S, Ikeda K. Targeted ablation of osteocytes induces osteoporosis with defective mechanotransduction. Cell Metab. 2007;5:464–75. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Glass DA, Ii, Bialek P, Ahn JD, Starbuck M, Patel MS, Clevers H, Taketo MM, Long F, McMahon AP, Lang RA, Karsenty G. Canonical Wnt Signaling in Differentiated Osteoblasts Controls Osteoclast Differentiation. Developmental Cell. 2005;8:751–764. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Takahashi N, Maeda K, Ishihara A, Uehara S, Kobayashi Y. Regulatory mechanism of osteoclastogenesis by RANKL and Wnt signals. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 2011;16:21–30. doi: 10.2741/3673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tu X, Rhee Y, Condon KW, Bivi N, Allen MR, Dwyer D, Stolina M, Turner CH, Robling AG, Plotkin LI, Bellido T. Sost downregulation and local Wnt signaling are required for the osteogenic response to mechanical loading. Bone. 2012;50:209–17. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.10.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.van Bezooijen RL, Roelen BA, Visser A, van der Wee-Pals L, de Wilt E, Karperien M, Hamersma H, Papapoulos SE, ten Dijke P, Lowik CW. Sclerostin is an osteocyte-expressed negative regulator of bone formation, but not a classical BMP antagonist. J Exp Med. 2004;199:805–14. doi: 10.1084/jem.20031454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Glass DA, 2nd, Karsenty G. In vivo analysis of Wnt signaling in bone. Endocrinology. 2007;148:2630–4. doi: 10.1210/en.2006-1372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Baron R, Rawadi G. Targeting the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway to regulate bone formation in the adult skeleton. Endocrinology. 2007;148:2635–43. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-0270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Mirza FS, Padhi ID, Raisz LG, Lorenzo JA. Serum sclerostin levels negatively correlate with parathyroid hormone levels and free estrogen index in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:1991–7. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-2283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Cejka D, Herberth J, Branscum AJ, Fardo DW, Monier-Faugere MC, Diarra D, Haas M, Malluche HH. Sclerostin and Dickkopf-1 in renal osteodystrophy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6:877–82. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06550810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]