Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 May 12;6:25982. doi: 10.1038/srep25982

Bacterial and archaeal communities in the deep-sea sediments of inactive hydrothermal vents in the Southwest India Ridge

Likui Zhang 1,a, Manyu Kang 1, Jiajun Xu 1, Jian Xu 1, Yinjie Shuai 1, Xiaojian Zhou 1, Zhihui Yang 2,b, Kesen Ma 3
PMCID: PMC4864381  PMID: 27169490

Abstract

Active deep-sea hydrothermal vents harbor abundant thermophilic and hyperthermophilic microorganisms. However, microbial communities in inactive hydrothermal vents have not been well documented. Here, we investigated bacterial and archaeal communities in the two deep-sea sediments (named as TVG4 and TVG11) collected from inactive hydrothermal vents in the Southwest India Ridge using the high-throughput sequencing technology of Illumina MiSeq2500 platform. Based on the V4 region of 16S rRNA gene, sequence analysis showed that bacterial communities in the two samples were dominated by Proteobacteria, followed by Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria and Firmicutes. Furthermore, archaeal communities in the two samples were dominated by Thaumarchaeota and Euryarchaeota. Comparative analysis showed that (i) TVG4 displayed the higher bacterial richness and lower archaeal richness than TVG11; (ii) the two samples had more divergence in archaeal communities than bacterial communities. Bacteria and archaea that are potentially associated with nitrogen, sulfur metal and methane cycling were detected in the two samples. Overall, we first provided a comparative picture of bacterial and archaeal communities and revealed their potentially ecological roles in the deep-sea environments of inactive hydrothermal vents in the Southwest Indian Ridge, augmenting microbial communities in inactive hydrothermal vents.

Deep-sea hydrothermal vent environments exhibit complex dynamic habitats that are characterized with steep thermal and chemical gradients1. Microorganisms thriving in hydrothermal vent environments have been extensively studied by cultivation-dependent and -independent approaches2. From these environments, thermophilic archaeal members of the orders Thermococcales, Methanococcales, Archaeoglobales, and Aquificales3,4,5, and mesophilic and thermophilic bacterial members of Epsilon-proteobacteria6,7 have been detected. However, active hydrothermal vents eventually become inactive ones, which may last for thousands of years8. Inactive hydrothermal vents provide potential habitats for microbial communities. Many reports have shown that inactive hydrothermal vents harbor a completely different assemblage of microorganisms, compared to active hydrothermal vents. For example, Thaumarchaeota, which are usually not major archaea in active vents, have been found to be widespread not only in several inactive hydrothermal vents8,9,10, but also in diffuse flow chimneys11. In addition, Alpha-, Beta-, Delta-, and Gamma-proteobacteria are dominant bacteria in several inactive hydrothermal vents8,10,12.

The Southwest Indian Ridge is a boundary between the Antarctic and African plates and extends from the Bouvet triple junction in the Atlantic Ocean to the Rodriguez triple junction in the Indian Ocean13. The first active hydrothermal vent (E 49°39, S 37°47) in the Southwest Indian Ridge was discovered in 2011, which is characterized with low temperatures and enrichment for chimney sulfides, such as pyrite, marcasite, sphalerite, and chalcopyrite14. In previous studies, arsenite-resistant bacteria were isolated from deep-sea sediments in the Southwest Indian Ridge15, and microbial sulfur cycle in two hydrothermal chimneys on the Southwest Indian Ridge were also revealed16. Furthermore, microbial communities in semi-consolidated carbonate sediments (51.009oE, 37.6081oS) of the Southwest Indian Ridge were investigated by traditional 16S rDNA clone library analysis9; however, extensive microbial diversity and abundance in inactive hydrothermal vents in the Southwest Indian Ridge have not been well understood.

The primary goal of this study was to reveal microbial communities of two deep-sea sediments located at different regions in inactive hydrothermal vents in the Southwest Indian Ridge. For this purpose, the V4 region of 16S rRNA gene were sequenced via an Illumina MiSeq 2500 platform, which is a high-throughput sequencing technology that has been frequently used to investigate microbial community structure in various environments17,18,19,20,21. In this study, bacteria and archaea covering 15 phyla, 34 classes, 58 orders, 101 families and 141 genera were detected, augmenting the microbial community structure in inactive hydrothermal vents in the Southwest Indian Ridge. Furthermore, our results revealed that bacterial communities were dominated by Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes and archaeal communities were mostly composed of Thaumarchaeota and Euryarchaeota. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on bacterial and archaeal communities of the deep-sea sediments in inactive hydrothermal vents in the Southwest Indian Ridge by Illumina high-throughput sequencing.

Results

Mineralogical and geochemical characteristics of the samples

Mineralogical and geochemical characteristics of the two samples were determined using X-ray diffraction phase, scanning electron microscope, carbon and oxygen isotope, and trace element analyses22. Generally, the two samples had similar mineralogical and geochemical characteristics summarized in Table 1. The total content of Rare Earth Element in the two samples tended to be low with a range of 19.82 ~ 21.08 × 10−6. The two samples had abundant trace elements, such as Sr and Ba, but depleted in siderophile elements. Major calcite (>95%) and lower content of clay minerals, aragonite and quartz were present in the two samples. Furthermore, the two samples had the higher content of δ18OPDB than δ13CPDB. However, the TVG4 sample was white sticky mud while the TVG11 sample was black loose mud and sand, which may lead to different microbial community structure.

Table 1. Geophysical features of sampling sites, mineralogical and geochemical characteristics of the samples.

Characteristic TVG4 TVG11
Location E 50.9277°, S 37.6251° E 50.9643°, S 37.6174°
Sampling date 11 January 2009 14 January 2009
Depth (m) 2086 1985
Description White sticky mud Black loose sand
REE concn (mg/kg)1 19.82 21.08
Trace element concn (mg/kg)2
 Li 2.93 2.70
 Be 0.06 0.06
 Sc 1.54 1.27
 V 8.55 8.23
 Cr 6.38 5.53
 Co 11.98 16.30
 Ni 11.13 12.97
 Cu 12.46 11.77
 Zn 18.85 20.06
 Ga 0.94 0.96
 Rb 4.29 4.28
 Sr 1494.00 1529.60
 Zr 6.96 6.60
 Nb 0.70 0.69
 Cs 0.23 0.23
 Ba 189.18 328.80
 Hf 0.15 0.14
 Ta 0.04 0.05
 Pb 3.77 4.39
 Th 0.41 0.48
 U 0.18 0.17
X-ray diffraction phase analysis content (%)3
 Calcite 95.3 96.8
 Quartz 0.7 0.4
 Aragonite 1.3  
 Clay minerals 2.7 2.8
Carbon and oxygen isotope analysis (%)4
 δ13CPDB 0.10 0.23
 δ18OPDB 0.52 1.82
Open in a new tab

1,2,3 and 4Data are cited from Chen et al.22. REE: Rare Earth Element, PDB: Pee Dee Belemnite.

Sequencing data

Sequencing information, diversity index, and estimators of richness were summarized in Table 2. The Illumina-based analysis of the hypervariable V4 region of 16S rRNA gene produced 78,461 and 358,589 total tags for bacteria and archaea, respectively. After filtering and removing potential erroneous sequences, a total of 74,980 and 311,035 effective tags were obtained for bacteria and archaea, respectively.

Table 2. Sequencing information in this study.

Sequencing information Bacteria Archaea
TVG4 TVG11 TVG4 TVG11
Number of total tags 45,414 33,047 180,951 177,638
Number of effective tags 43,139 31,841 148,922 162,113
OTUs (97% similarity) 366 280 19 19
Shannon index 5.76 3.99 2.05 3.05
Chao 1 index 371 283 19 19
Open in a new tab

Based on 97% similarity (Table 2), a total of 366 and 280 OTUs (operational taxonomic units) for bacterial diversity were obtained in TVG4 and TVG11 respectively, and a total of common 19 OTUs for archaeal diversity were obtained in TVG4 and TVG11. The Venn diagram for bacterial diversity showed that TVG4 and TVG11 shared 267 OTUs, 99 and 13 OTUs were unique in TVG4 and TVG11 respectively (Fig. 1). Interestingly, no unique archaeal OTU was observed in TVG4 and TVG11, besides the shared 19 OTUs.

Figure 1. Venn diagrams of the OTUs for bacterial diversity.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Unique and shared OTUs between the two samples were based on 97% similarity. The numbers inside the diagram are the numbers of OTUs.

In alpha diversity analysis, rarefaction curves, Chao1 index and Shannon index were generated based on 97% similarity. Rarefaction curve analysis of OTUs in the two samples indicated that TVG4 had more bacterial species than TVG11 (Fig. 2A), and the two samples had the same archaeal species (Fig. 2B). This was confirmed by Chao1 index (Table 2). Furthermore, both rarefaction curves for bacterial and archaeal species approached an asymptote (Fig. 2), suggesting that the sampling depths were sufficient to capture overall microbial diversities in the two samples. In addition, Shannon’s diversity index showed that the order of the diversity, ranging from high to low, was TVG4 for bacterial diversity (Shannon = 5.76), TVG11 for bacterial diversity (Shannon = 3.99), TVG11 for archaeal diversity (Shannon = 3.05), and TVG4 for archaeal diversity (Shannon = 2.05) (Table 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Rarefaction curves of 16S rDNA sequences for bacterial diversity (A) and archaeal diversity (B) in the two samples. Curves were calculated based on OTUs at 97% similarity.

Microbial community analysis

A total of 386,015 effective tags were obtained, including 74,980 bacterial tags and 311,035 archaeal tags (Table 2). Bacterial tags covered 13 phyla, 32 classes, 56 orders, 97 families, 138 genera, and archaeal tags covered 2 phyla, 2 classes, 2 orders, 2 families, and 3 genera. Bacterial and archaeal sequences from the two samples were further analyzed at the phylum, class and genus levels.

Based on average abundance analysis, at the phylum level, Proteobacteria (77.4%), Bacteroidetes (17.5%), Actinobacteria (2.9%) and Firmicutes (1.3%) were the four major phyla of bacteria in TVG4 (Fig. 3A). Proteobacteria (92.9%) and Bacteroidetes (6.0%) were the two major phyla of bacteria in TVG11 (Fig. 3A). In addition, Gemmatimonadetes, Verrucomicrobia, Acidobacteria, Chloroflexi, TM7 and other bacteria were found in TVG4 and TVG11 with low abundance (<1%) (Fig. 3A). While TVG4 had lower abundance of Proteobacteria than TVG11, TVG4 had higher abundance of Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria and Firmicutes than TVG11. Thus, the results suggest that Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes are dominant phyla in TVG4 and TVG11.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Relative abundance of bacteria (A) and archaea (B) at the phylum level. Each color represents the percentage of the phylum in the total effective tags of each sample.

At the phylum level, 99.57% of sequences belonged to Euryarchaeota phylum while only 0.43% of sequences were members of Thaumarchaeota phylum in TVG4 (Fig. 3B), suggesting that Euryarchaeota are major phyla in TVG4. In contrast, 88.22% of sequences belonged to Thaumarchaeota phylum while 11.78% of sequences were members of Euryarchaeota in TVG11 (Fig. 3B), indicating that Thaumarchaeota are predominant phyla in TVG11. Thus, the results suggest the significant divergence in the relative abundance of archaeal phyla between TVG11 and TVG4, although no unique OTU was observed for them.

Of the 32 classes of bacteria, 28 classes were found in TVG4 and TVG11. Based on average relative abundance, Alpha-proteobacteria (48.2% for TVG4 and 68.7% for TVG11), Gamma-proteobacteria (23.7% for TVG4 and 22.7% for TVG11), Sphingobacteria (12.8% for TVG4 and 1.0% for TVG11), Beta-proteobacteria (5.32% for TVG4 and 1.54% for TVG11), Flavobacteria (4.63% for TVG4 and 5.08% for TVG11) were the five major classes of bacteria in the two samples (Fig. 4A). In addition, Actinobacteria, Bacilli, Clostridia, Thermoleophilia and others were found with low abundance in the two samples (Fig. 4A). Thus, Alpha-proteobacteria was the major class in the two samples, followed by Gamma-proteobacteria, Sphingobacteria, Beta-proteobacteria and Flavobacteria.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Relative abundance of bacteria (A) and archaea (B) at the class level. Each color represents the percentage of the class in the total effective tags of each sample.

Halobacteriales of Euryarchaeota phylum and Nitrosopumilales of Thaumarchaeota phylum were the main classes of archaea in the two samples (Fig. 4B). While TVG11 had a low relative abundance of Halobacteriales (9.3%) and a high relative abundance of Nitrosopumilales (90.7%), TVG4 had a high relative abundance of Halobacteriales (99.3%) and a low relative abundance of Nitrosopumilales (0.7%). Overall, the two samples had same archaeal species, but different relative abundance.

At the genus level, the most abundant bacterial genus in the two samples was Thalassospira with a relative abundance of 25.8%; other nine abundant genera were Methylophaga, KSA1, Erythrobacter, Loktanella, Marinobacter, Alcanivorax, Idiomarina, Sphingobium and Anaerospora (Fig. 5A). On the other hand, at the genus level, the most abundant archaeal genus in TVG4 was Natronomonas (39.5%), followed by Halolamina (14.2%), while Nitrosopumilus was the most abundant archaeal genus in TVG11 with a relative abundance of (27.9%) (Fig. 5B).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Relative abundance of bacteria (A) and archaea (B) at the genus level. Each color represents the percentage of the genus in the total effective tags of each sample.

Beta diversity index analysis of the samples

Based on the weighted UniFrac distance and unweighted UniFrac distance cluster analysis, a dissimilarity coefficient for the two samples was measured to estimate the divergence of microbial species between them. The lower dissimilarity coefficients suggest the less divergence of microbial species. In this study, the dissimilarity coefficients for the two samples were measured to be 0.2 and 0.568 for bacterial and archaeal diversities, respectively (Fig. 6), suggesting that more divergence in the two samples was observed for archaeal species than for bacterial species.

Figure 6. Beta diversity index of the bacterial and archaeal communities in the two samples.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Beta diversity index were measured based on weighted Unifrac and unweighted Unifrac distances. The upper and under numbers in the grid represents the weighted Unifrac and unweighted Unifrac distances, respectively. (A). Beta diversity index for bacterial communities; (B). Beta diversity index for archaeal communities.

Discussion

High-throughput sequencing techniques provide powerful tools for studying microbial communities in extreme environments, including deep-sea environments. For example, MiSeq sequencing platform PE250 or PE300 is capable of reading long DNA fragments and is widely used for microbial 16S rDNA sequencing23, allowing us to detect rare microorganisms with low relative abundance (<0.01%) that would been masked by dominant populations if techniques with lower resolution had been applied24. Thus, the accuracy of species abundance will be greatly enhanced by MiSeq sequencing platform. Currently, Miseq sequencing platform has been a prior method to study microbial diversities in various environments. To discern more fully bacterial and archaeal communities in deep-sea sediments from inactive hydrothermal vents at the Southwest Indian Ridge, the V4 region of 16S rRNA gene from the two sample DNA were amplified and phylogenetically analyzed by a barcoded IIIumina high-throughput sequencing.

The phylum Proteobacteria was dominant in the taxonomic groups of the two samples in this study. Within this phylum, Alpha-proteobacteria, Gamma-proteobacteria, and Sphingobacteriia, were the three main classes, which are similar to the reports on the deep-sea sediments from Iheya North and Iheya Ridge19 and metal-rich vent deposits from Pacific Ocean hydrothermal fields25,26. In the Southwest Indian ridge, similar observations were also made in semi-consolidated carbonate sediment samples9. Previous studies have shown that Epsilon-proteobacteria are dominant bacteria identified from active hydrothermal vents, and play a role in carbon and sulfur cycles6,12,27,28. However, Epsilon-proteobacteria was not detected in the two samples in this study. Compared to bacterial communities in active vents, which are dominated by Epsilon-proteobacteria, bacterial communities in inactive vents are mostly composed of Alpha-, Beta-, Delta-, and Gamma-proteobacteria8,10,12. Our results augment the hypothesis that while Epsilon-proteobacteria prefers active hydrothermal vents, Alpha-, Beta-, Delta-, and Gamma-proteobacteria prefer inactive hydrothermal vents.

Bacteroidetes was the second most abundant phylum in the two samples examined in this study and contained three classes, i.e. Sphingobacteria, Flavobacteria, and Bacteroidia. Previous studies have shown that Bacteroidetes are widely distributed in many inactive and active deep-sea hydrothermal vents7,12. It was also detected as one of the most abundant phylum in methane seep sediments in the Nankai Trough29. In this study, the abundance of Bacteroidetes in TVG4 was higher than that in TVG11, likely as a result of environmental difference between these two samples. Other dominant groups of bacteria identified in this study include members of Gemmatimonadetes, Verrucomicrobia, Acidobacteria, Chloroflexi, TM7, etc., which are known to be widely distributed in crustal fluids, deep-sea sediments, and inactive hydrothermal chimneys, but rare in active hydrothermal regions8,12,25,30.

Euryarchaeota, Crenarchaeota, and Thaumarchaeota are known to be three major archaeal phyla in global environments. In this study, only Euryarchaeota and Thaumarchaeota were identified. Specifically, Thaumarchaeota were the major phylum in TVG11 while Euryarchaeota were the predominant archaea in TVG4. Previous studies have shown that Thaumarchaeota are widely found not only in several inactive hydrothermal vents from Southwest Indian Ridge, Western Pacific Ocean and Central Indian Ridge8,9 as well as in diffuse flow chimneys from Arctic Mid-Ocean Ridge31. Besides, members of Thaumarchaeota are found in marine, freshwater, soils, and anoxic subsurface sediments32, all which possess the dissimilatory ammonia oxidation pathway and gain energy by ammonia oxidation33. However, few Thaumarchaeota has been found in active hydrothermal vents, which harbor a great number of typical (hyper)thermophilic archaea, such as Desulfurococcales, Thermococcales and Archaeoglobales4,27,34,35,36. Thaumarchaeota also dominated the archaeal communities in the semi-consolidated carbonate deep-sea sediments in the Southwest Indian ridge9, which is consistent with our observations. Taken together, these results suggest a wide presence of Thaumarchaeota in inactive hydrothermal vents.

Besides Thaumarchaeota, Natronomonas and Halolamina were dominant Euryarchaeota in TVG4 in this work. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the presence of Natronomonas and Halolamina in inactive hydrothermal vents. Recently, the analysis of microbial diversity in the new deep-sea hypersaline Lake Thetis located in the Western part of the Mediterranean Ridge indicated that neither Natronomonas nor Halolamina was not detected37,38. The presence of Natronomonas and Halolamina in the Southwest Indian ridge may be relevant to the geochemical environments.

The genera Nitrospira of the Nitrospinae phylum are mainly widespread in marine environments including metal-rich sediments from Green Bay and western Pacific Ocean25,39, and participate in nitrogen cycling by converting nitrites to nitrates40,41. These two bacteria were also detected in the two samples. In this study, Nitrospira accounted for 0.01% of total bacteria in the two samples in Table 2. Furthermore, Rhizobiales, which participates in nitrogen-fixing42, accounted for 2.2% of total bacteria in the two samples (Table 3). Besides bacteria, archaea also play an important role in the oxidation of ammonia to nitrite and in N2 fixation32. For example, Thaumarchaeota harbors the ammoniamonooxygenase subunit A (amoA) gene, and the encoded AmoA can oxidize ammonia to nitrite43. The genera Nitrosopumilus of the phylum Thaumarchaeota, an ammonia-oxidizing archaea, was detected with a high relative abundance (27.9%) in TVG11 but a low relative abundance (20%) in TVG4 (Table 3). The presence of these bacterial and archaeal communities that are associated with nitrogen metabolism in this study indicates a likely involvement of these microbes in the process of nitrogen cycle.

Table 3. Potential ecological roles of the microbial organisms.

Potential role Taxon TVG4 (%) TVG11 (%)
N cycling Nitrospira 0.007 0.003
Rhizobiales 1.3 0.9
Nitrosopumilus 0.2 27.9
Metal oxidation Hyphomicrobium 0.06 0.27
Rhodococcus 0.02 0.003
Acinetobacter 0.03 0.1
Caulobacter 0.09 0.02
S oxidation Rhodobacteraceae 6.88 4.09
Desulfobacterales 0.007 ND
CH4 oxidation Planctomycetes 0.005 0.003
Open in a new tab

ND: not detectable.

Increasing evidences suggest that bacteria play a key role in the formation of deep-sea metallic mineral44. For example, Rhodococcus, Caulobacter, Hyphomicrobium and Acinetobacter are known to be involved in metal metabolism45,46,47,48. In this study, these four genera accounted for 0.59% of the bacteria and had a higher abundance in TVG11 (0.39%) than in TVG4 (0.20%) (Table 3). The genus Hyphomicrobium of the Alpha-proteobacteria class, which is known to associate with metal metabolism45, accounted for 0.32% of the bacteria in this study. Rhodococcus, one genus of Mn-oxidizing bacteria, was detected with a relative abundance of 0.023%. Rhodococcus, which was first isolated from submarine basalts, can absorb metals such as Co, Cu, Ni and Mn, thus facilitating metal enrichment46. The genera Acinetobacter of the Gamma-proteobacteria class, which is involved in nutrient metal acquisition and metabolism47, were detected in the two samples with a 0.13% of relative abundance. Furthermore, Caulobacter within the Alpha-proteobacteria class can absorb and metabolize a variety of metals including Mn, Co, and Fe48. Caulobacter was detected in the two samples with a 0.11% of relative abundance. Overall, the presence of metal-utilizing bacteria of the samples in this study suggests a mechanism of environment induced microbial adaptation.

Alpha-, Delta-, Gamma- and Epsilon-proteobacteria are known to mediate sulfide reduction and oxidation49, which is one of the most important microbial chemosynthetic pathways in deep-sea hydrothermal ecosystems50. In this study, potential sulfide oxidation/reduction microbes comprised over 10.977% of the bacteria, including Alpha- and Delta-proteobacteria (Table 3). The order Rhodobacteraceae of Alpha-proteobacteria class and the order Desulfobacterales of Delta-proteobacteria class, which accounted for 10.97% and 0.007% of the bacteria in this study (Table 3), respectively, have been detected in many hydrothermal chimneys with functions of sulfide oxidation or reduction5,25,51.

Besides the bacteria and archaea associated with nitrogen and sulfur cycling and metal metabolism, the genus Planctomycetes was detected with a total abundance of 0.08% in this study (Table 3). Chistoserdova et al. suggested a possible role for Planctomycetes in the evolution of the methane cycle on Earth52. Thus, the presence of Planctomycetes in the two samples of our study is thought to participate in CH4 oxidation.

Alpha diversity analysis showed that bacterial richness in TVG4 were higher than that in TVG11 while archaeal richness in TVG4 were lower than that in TVG11 as revealed by Shannon’s diversity index, suggesting that environmental parameters probably have a significant impact on microbial community. Beta diversity analysis showed that the two samples had more difference in archaeal abundance than bacterial abundance. These results suggest that the distance to active hydrothermal vents and ambient environmental parameters probably have an important influence on the formation of microbial communities, even in the same oceanic ridge.

In conclusion, we revealed for the first time the comparative analysis of the microbial diversity in different sediments of the Southwest Indian Ridge using the high-throughput sequencing technology of Illumina MiSeq 2500 platform. Although the taxonomies of microbial communities in the two samples are largely similar, the abundances of most of the taxa differ between the two samples. Furthermore, our results revealed that bacterial communities were dominant by Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes and archaeal communities were mostly composed of Thaumarchaeota and Euryarchaeota. These bacterial and archaeal communities would be potentially involved in nitrogen and sulfur cycling, and metal metabolism, suggesting that they play the important roles in ecological function in inactive deep-sea hydrothermal vents.

Methods

Sample sites and collection

The sediment samples were collected from the inactive hydrothermal vents using a television grab bucket of the R/V Da-Yang-Yi-Hao conducted by the China Ocean Mineral Resource R&D Association in 2009. The positions of the samples were as follows: TVG4 (E 50.9277°, S 37.6251°, ~2086 m) and TVG11 (E 50.9643°, S 37.6174°, ~1985 m). After sample collection, the TVG4 and TVG11 samples were frozen at −20 °C immediately before being processed.

Mineralogical and geochemical analysis

Mineralogical and geochemical characteristics of the two samples were performed by X-ray diffraction phase, scanning electron microscope, carbon and oxygen isotope, and trace element analyses at China University of Geosciences at Beijing in 201322.

DNA extraction and PCR amplification

Total microbial community DNA was directly extracted from the two samples by using Mo Bio soil DNA extraction kit (Carlsbad, CA USA) according to manual instructions. 0.25 g (wet weight) of the TVG4 and TVG11 samples was used for DNA extraction. DNA was finally eluted with 50 μl elution buffer supplied with Mo Bio soil DNA extraction kit. The concentrations of DNA from the two samples were determined by Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific, MA, USA).

The universal primer set 515F (5′-GTG CCA GCM GCC GCG GTA A-3′) and 806R (5′-GGA CTA CNN GGG TAT CTA AT-3′) was used for the amplification of the V4 region of bacterial 16S rRNA gene. The universal primer set U519F (5′-CAG YMG CCR CGG KAA HAC C-3′) and 806R (5′-GGA CTA CNN GGG TAT CTA AT-3′) was used for the amplification of the V4 region of archaeal 16S rRNA gene. All PCR reactions were carried out in 30 μl reactions with 15 μl of Phusion® High-Fidelity PCR Master Mix (New England Biolabs, MA, USA), 0.2 μM of forward and reverse primers, and about 10 ng DNA. Thermal cycling consisted of initial denaturation at 98 °C for 1 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 98 °C for 10 s, annealing at 50 °C for 30 s, and elongation at 72 °C for 60 s, finally 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR products were analyzed on 2% agarose gel, and the DNA (~300 bp) was purified with GeneJET Gel Extrac-tion Kit (Thermo Scientific).

16S rDNA library preparation and sequencing

Sequencing libraries were generated using NEB Next® Ultra™ DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England Biolabs) following manufacturer’s recommendations and different multipex indexing barcodes were added. The library quality was assessed on the Qubit@ 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Scientific) and Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system. The libraries were sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq platform 2500 and 250 bp paired-end reads were generated at Novogene (Beijing, China). Complete data were submitted to the NCBI Short Read Archive database under accession no. SRP062532 for bacterial sequences and no. SRP063077 for archaeal sequences.

Quality filtering, OTUs picking and annotation

Raw data obtained from the Illumina MiSeq sequencing platform must be processed because they contain some low quality data that will interfere with analysis results. Based on the sequences of barcodes, raw data were demerged and then used to merge paired-end reads of each sample by using FLASH software53, when at least some of the reads overlap the read generated from the opposite end of the same DNA fragment. Paired-end reads was assigned to each sample according to the unique barcode. Barcode sequences and PCR primer sequences were also removed. The resulting sequences were defined as raw tags. The merged raw tag was strictly filtered and developed into clean tags with high quality. By means of QIMME (quantitative insights into microbial ecology)54, these clean tags were further processed. The site of first base from consecutive data with low quality (the default threshold value is < = 3) will be truncated if the base number is up to the defined length (the default length is 3). The truncated tags were developed into tags group. Among tags, some tags that contain base length with consecutively high quality is shorter 75% of tags length were further filtered. After processing mentioned as above, the obtained tags were blasted with Unite Database to detect chimera sequence by UCHIME Algorithm55. The chimera sequence was finally removed, and the effective tags were generated56.

During OTUs construction, the data of effective tags and tags with low quality, and tags annotated were analyzed. Effective tags with ≥97% similarity were clustered by Uparse57 and were classified into one OTU. For species analysis, sequences with ≥97% similarity were assigned to the same OTUs using Uparse, and similarity hits below 97% were not considered for classification purpose. A representative sequence of each OTU was picked out and the taxonomic information was annotated using RDP classifier58 and GreenGene database59.

Diversity analysis

QIIME software package was used to analyze alpha (within samples) and beta (among samples) diversity. In alpha diversity analysis, the OTU tables were rarified and three metrics were calculated: Chao1 estimates the richness of microbial species; Observed Species estimates the amount of OTUs in each sample, and Shannon index estimates the diversity of microbial species. Based on these three metrics, rarefaction curves were generated. In beta diversity analysis, QIIME software package was also used to calculate both weighted and unweighted unifrac distance, which generates the beta diversity index.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Zhang, L. et al. Bacterial and archaeal communities in the deep-sea sediments of inactive hydrothermal vents in the Southwest India Ridge. Sci. Rep. 6, 25982; doi: 10.1038/srep25982 (2016).

Acknowledgments

We thank all the participants of the cruise of ‘Da Yang Yi Hao’ (DY115-20VI) for sample collection on January, 2009, and specially thank Prof. Xiang Xiao for providing sediment samples. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant (41306131), the Natural Science Foundation Grant for College and University of Jiangsu Province, China (13KJB180029), the Provincial Natural Science Foundation Grant of Jiangsu Province, China (BK20130440), and the open project of State Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources (SKLMR-20130603) to L.Z., the National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant (41271521) to X.Z., the Yangzhou University College Student Science and Technology Innovation Grant to M.K., and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) to K.M.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Author Contributions L.Z. and M.K. contributed to the initial design of this project. M.K., J.X., J.X. and Y.S. conducted the experiments. Z.Y. conducted the bioinformatics analyses. L.Z., X.Z., M.K., Z.Y. and K.M. prepared the manuscript of this publication.

References

  1. Jannasch H. W. & Mottl M. J. Geomicrobiology of deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Science 229, 717–725 (1985). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jeanthon C. Molecular ecology of hydrothermal vent microbial communities. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 77, 117–133 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Takai K. & Horikoshi K. Genetic diversity of archaea in deep-sea hydrothermal vent environments. Genetics 152, 1285–1297 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Flores G. E. et al. Distribution, abundance and diversity patterns of the thermoacidophilic “deep-sea hydrothermal vent euryarchaeota 2”. Front Microbiol 3, 47 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Takai K. et al. Distribution of archaea in a black smoker chimney structure. Appl Environ Microbiol 67, 3618–3629 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Huber J. A. et al. Isolated communities of Epsilonproteobacteria in hydrothermal vent fluids of the Mariana Arc seamounts. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 73, 538–549 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Stokke R. et al. Functional interactions among filamentous Epsilonproteobacteria and Bacteroidetes in a deep-sea hydrothermal vent biofilm. Environ Microbiol 17, 4063–4077 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Suzuki Y. et al. Microbial diversity in inactive chimney structures from deep-sea hydrothermal systems. Microb Ecol 47, 186–196 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Li J. et al. Microbial communities in semi-consolidated carbonate sediments of the Southwest Indian Ridge. J Microbiol 52, 111–119 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kato S. et al. Biogeography and biodiversity in sulfide structures of active and inactive vents at deep-sea hydrothermal fields of the Southern Mariana Trough. Appl Environ Microbiol 76, 2968–2979 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Campbell B. J. et al. Diffuse flow environments within basalt- and sediment-based hydrothermal vent ecosystems harbor specialized microbial communities. Front Microbiol 4, 182 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sylvan J. B., Toner B. M. & Edwards K. J. Life and death of deep-sea vents: bacterial diversity and ecosystem succession on inactive hydrothermal sulfides. MBio 3, e00279–11 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Muller M. R., Minshull T. A. & White R. S. Segmentation and melt supply at the Southwest Indian Ridge. Geology 27, 867–870 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  14. Tao C. H., et al. Mineralogical and geochemical features of sulfide chimneys from the 49A degrees 39 ‘ E hydrothermal field on the Southwest Indian Ridge and their geological inferences. Chinese Science Bulletin 56, 2828–2838 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen S. & Shao Z. Isolation and diversity analysis of arsenite-resistant bacteria in communities enriched from deep-sea sediments of the Southwest Indian Ocean Ridge. Extremophiles 13, 39–48 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cao H. et al. Microbial sulfur cycle in two hydrothermal chimneys on the Southwest Indian Ridge. MBio 5, e00980–13 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lentini V. et al. Diversity of prokaryotic community at a shallow marine hydrothermal site elucidated by Illumina Sequencing Technology. Curr Microbiol 69, 457–466 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Staley C. et al. Application of Illumina next-generation sequencing to characterize the bacterial community of the Upper Mississippi River. J Appl Microbiol 115, 1147–1158 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhang J. et al. Microbial diversity in the deep-sea sediments of Iheya North and Iheya Ridge, Okinawa Trough. Microbiol Res 177, 43–52 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Logares R. et al. Metagenomic 16S rDNA Illumina tags are a powerful alternative to amplicon sequencing to explore diversity and structure of microbial communities. Environ Microbiol 16, 2659–2671 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Caporaso J. G. et al. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108 Suppl 1, 4516–4522 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Chen Y. et al. Mineralogical and geochemical characteristics of the calcareous sediments in southwest Indian Ridge. Geological Science and Technology Information 32, 107–113 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  23. Degnan P. H. & Ochman H. Illumina-based analysis of microbial community diversity. ISME J 6, 183–194 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sogin M. L. et al. Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored “rare biosphere”. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 12115–12120 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Liao L. et al. Microbial diversity in deep-sea sediment from the cobalt-rich crust deposit region in the Pacific Ocean. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 78, 565–585 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Xu M. et al. Construction and preliminary analysis of a metagenomic library from a deep-sea sediment of east Pacific Nodule Province. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 62, 233–241 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Flores G. E. et al. Microbial community structure of hydrothermal deposits from geochemically different vent fields along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Environ Microbiol 13, 2158–2171 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Takai K. et al. Geochemical and microbiological evidence for a hydrogen-based, hyperthermophilic subsurface lithoautotrophic microbial ecosystem (HyperSLiME) beneath an active deep-sea hydrothermal field. Extremophiles 8, 269–282 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nunoura T. et al. Microbial diversity in deep-sea methane seep sediments presented by SSU rRNA gene tag sequencing. Microbes Environ 27, 382–390 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kato S. et al. Characteristics of microbial communities in crustal fluids in a deep-sea hydrothermal field of the suiyo seamount. Front Microbiol 4, 85 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Jaeschke A. et al. Biosignatures in chimney structures and sediment from the Loki’s Castle low-temperature hydrothermal vent field at the Arctic Mid-Ocean Ridge. Extremophiles 18, 545–560 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Offre, P. A. Spang & Schleper C. Archaea in biogeochemical cycles. Annu Rev Microbiol 67, 437–457 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Stahl D. A. & de la Torre J. R. Physiology and diversity of ammonia-oxidizing archaea. Annu Rev Microbiol 66, 83–101 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhou H. et al. Microbial diversity of a sulfide black smoker in main endeavour hydrothermal vent field, Juan de Fuca Ridge. J Microbiol 47, 235–247 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Crepeau V. et al. Diversity and function in microbial mats from the Lucky Strike hydrothermal vent field. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 76, 524–540 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Jaeschke A. et al. Microbial diversity of Loki’s Castle black smokers at the Arctic Mid-Ocean Ridge. Geobiology 10, 548–561 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ferrer M. et al. Unveiling microbial life in the new deep-sea hypersaline Lake Thetis. Part II: a metagenomic study. Environ Microbiol 14, 268–281 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. La Cono V. et al. Unveiling microbial life in new deep-sea hypersaline Lake Thetis. Part I: Prokaryotes and environmental settings. Environ Microbiol 13, 2250–2268 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Stein L. Y. et al. Bacterial and archaeal populations associated with freshwater ferromanganous micronodules and sediments. Environ Microbiol 3, 10–18 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Haaijer S. C. et al. A novel marine nitrite-oxidizing Nitrospira species from Dutch coastal North Sea water. Front Microbiol 4, 60 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Falk S., Liu B. B. & Braker G. Isolation, genetic and functional characterization of novel soil nirK-type denitrifiers. Syst and Appl Microbiol 33, 337–347 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Im W. T. et al. Pleomorphomonas koreensis sp. nov., a nitrogen-fixing species in the order Rhizobiales. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56, 1663–1666 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Pester M. C. Schleper & Wagner M. The Thaumarchaeota: an emerging view of their phylogeny and ecophysiology. Curr Opin Microbiol 14, 300–306 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang X. H. et al. Evidence for biogenic processes during formation of ferromanganese crusts from the Pacific Ocean: Implications of biologically induced mineralization. Micron 40, 526–535 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zuo Y. et al. Isolation of the exoelectrogenic bacterium Ochrobactrum anthropi YZ-1 by using a U-tube microbial fuel cell. Appl Environ Microbiol 74, 3130–3137 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Templeton A. S. H. Staudigel & B. M. Tebo Diverse Mn(II)-oxidizing bacteria isolated from submarine basalts at Loihi Seamount. Geomicrobiol J 22, 127–139 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  47. Mortensen B. L. & Skaar E. P. The contribution of nutrient metal acquisition and metabolism to Acinetobacter baumannii survival within the host. Fron in Cellul and Infect Microbiol 3, (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Krishnan K. P. et al. Tolerance and immobilization of cobalt by some bacteria from ferromanganese crusts of the Afanasiy Nikitin Seamounts. Geomicrobiol J 23, 31–36 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  49. Muyzer G. & Stams A. J. The ecology and biotechnology of sulphate-reducing bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 6, 441–454 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Nakagawa T. et al. Phylogenetic diversity of sulfate-reducing prokaryotes in active deep-sea hydrothermal vent chimney structures. FEMS Microbiol Lett 232, 145–152 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Kormas K. A. et al. Bacterial and archaeal phylotypes associated with distinct mineralogical layers of a white smoker spire from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent site (9 degrees N, East Pacific Rise). Environ Microbiol 8, 909–920 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Chistoserdova L. et al. The enigmatic Planctomycetes may hold a key to the origins of methanogenesis and methylotrophy. Mol Biol and Evol 21, 1234–1241 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Magoc T. & Salzberg S. L. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27, 2957–2963 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Caporaso J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7, 335–336 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Edgar R. C. et al. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27, 2194–2200 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Haas B. J. et al. Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection in Sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR amplicons. Genome Res 21, 494–504 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Edgar R. C. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods 10, 996–998 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Wang Q. et al. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 73, 5261–5267 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. DeSantis T. Z. et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol 72, 5069–5072 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES