Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 12.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Neurol. 2016 Apr;15(5):451–452. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00067-3

Sex differences in Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias

Carolyn M Mazure 1,, Joel Swendsen 1
PMCID: PMC4864429  NIHMSID: NIHMS783200  PMID: 26987699

The Lancet Neurology Commission1 draws attention to the dramatically increasing personal, societal, and economic costs of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and associated dementias, and provides a call to action for an innovative research response to develop prevention and treatment strategies. The Commission also emphasises that the symptoms and course of dementias necessitate long-term care, thus requiring outcome assessments that include both patients’ health status and the viability of health-care systems. We assert that, integrated within the portfolio of research proposed by the Commission, a focus on the effect of sex on AD and other dementias is essential to ensure progress in understanding, treatment, and prevention of these disorders.

AD and other dementias disproportionately affect women. The Commission affirms that, for most regions of the world, the occurrence of AD and other dementias is higher in women than in men, particularly in the most elderly, and that women provide most caregiving for people with dementia.1 However, beyond statistics showing the greater burden of dementias for women, empirical data about sex differences and emerging sex-specific findings in dementias can guide and inform the scientific approach to these illnesses for the benefit of both women and men.

Brain development and adult brain structure, function, and biochemistry differ by sex.2 These sex differences in the brain are initiated through sex-determining genes and fetal hormonal programming. Such differences have important implications for brain-based disease risk and for clinical and investigational approaches. For example, with regard to genetic findings, the results of a large prospective cohort study published in 2015 confirmed previous case–control reports that women who are positive for the ε4 allele of the apolipoprotein E gene (APOE ε4) are at greater risk of developing AD than are men with this allele,3 and they demonstrate more severe behavioural disinhibition.4 As pointed out in these investigations, the inconsistency of past findings about this allele could be attributable specifically to investigators overlooking the APOE-ε4-by-sex interaction, resulting in missed opportunities to enhance understanding of the genetic underpinnings of AD.3 Testing for the effects of numerous other genes implicated in dementias by sex, rather than pooling data for both sexes, would likewise speed efforts to discern new directions for personalised treatment and management.5

In terms of localised brain changes and brain function, reports suggest that women diagnosed with AD experience a faster progression of hippocampal atrophy than do men,6 whereas men might be more likely to progress to AD in the presence of severe periventricular white matter hyperintensities and reduced global cognitive performance.7 Women and men also have different clinical presentations, in that men show more aggressive behaviours, more comorbidity, and higher mortality than women; women tend to have more affective symptoms and disability but longer survival times.8 These presentations might indicate different neuropathologies and certainly necessitate different management strategies to serve men and women with dementia.

From the perspective of treatment, emerging evidence also points to the possibility that sex-specific genetic and hormonal factors contribute to variance in clinical efficacy. For example, the improved response to acetylcholinesterase inhibitor treatment in women with AD was attributed to variants of the oestrogen receptor α gene (ESR1).9 In addition to differences in genetic or brain-based vulnerabilities, broader societal factors also have roles in the risk, course, and outcome of dementias. Perhaps the most salient examples are education and occupation levels, both of which have repeatedly been shown to affect the risk of dementia and for which substantial inequalities have existed between the sexes in previous generations.5 A host of behavioural and lifestyle choices, including diet, exercise, and tobacco and alcohol use, also affect vascular risk factors and the degree of disability in individuals with dementia. In brief, an individual’s behaviours and experiences over the lifespan affect the brain, and many of these factors vary by sex.

graphic file with name nihms783200u1.jpg

Sex differences, extending from genetic to psychosocial domains, are relevant to productive and reproducible research, and they signal urgent priorities for public health planning. For example, almost all countries are facing the same demographic evolution in which women are diversifying their roles while carrying the heavier burden of caregiving. The availability of resources differs substantially across countries, yet the needs of a growing population of people with dementias cannot be met by public and social-care sectors alone, prompting important questions about the role of women in future caregiving.1

Advances have been made in various fields, from cardiology to addiction medicine, by analysing the effects of sex on outcomes.10 The Lancet Neurology Commission provides a timely opportunity to embrace this approach in the research agenda for AD and other dementias.

Footnotes

We declare no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Winblad B, Amouyel P, Andrieu S, et al. Defeating Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias: a priority for European science and society. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:455–532. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00062-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cosgrove K, Mazure CM, Staley JK. Evolving knowledge of sex differences in brain structure, function, and chemistry. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;62:847–55. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Altmann A, Tian L, Henderson VW, Grecicius MD ADNI Investigators. Sex modifies the APOE-related risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol. 2014;4:563–73. doi: 10.1002/ana.24135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Xing Y, Tang Y, Jia J. Sex differences in neuropsychiatric symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease: the modifying effect of apolipoprotein E ε4 status. Behav Neurol. 2015 doi: 10.1155/2015/275256.. published online Sept 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mielke MM, Vemuri P, Rocca WA. Clinical epidemiology of Alzheimer’s disease: assessing sex and gender differences. Clin Epidemiol. 2014;6:37–48. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S37929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ardekani BA, Convit A, Bachman AH. Analysis of the MIRIAS data shows sex differences in hippocampal atrophy progression. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;50:3. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kim S, Kim JM, Kim S, et al. Gender differences in risk factors for transition from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease: a CREDOS study. Comprehensive Psychiatr. 2015;62:114–22. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sinforiani E, Citterio A, Zucchella C, et al. Impact of gender differences on the outcome of Alzheimer’s disease. Dementia. 2010;30:147–54. doi: 10.1159/000318842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Scacchi R, Gambina G, Broggio E, Corbo RM. Sex and ESR1 genotype may influence the response to treatment with donepezil and rivastigmine in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014;29:610–15. doi: 10.1002/gps.4043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mazure CM, Jones DP. Twenty years and still counting: including women as participants and studying sex and gender in biomedical research. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15:94. doi: 10.1186/s12905-015-0251-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES