Abstract
Aim:
This study was undertaken to compare the immunoglobulin Y (IgY) level and its efficacy in laying hens of four different breeds of poultry (viz., Vanraja, Gramapriya, BlackRock, and KalingaBrown) and its relative transfer in egg yolk and chick.
Materials and Methods:
This study was conducted in 48 apparently healthy laying hens vaccinated with Salmonella inactivated polyvalent vaccine, eggs and progeny chicks; 12 each from four different breeds of poultry, viz., Vanraja, Gramapriya, BlackRock, and KalingaBrown. The methodology included measurement of egg and yolk weight, total protein and IgY in egg yolk, total serum protein and IgY in breeding hens, and progeny chicks and extent of IgY transfer from hens to yolk then to chicks. Further, Salmonella-specific antibodies in breeding hens, egg yolk and progeny chicks were assessed using O and H antigen by tube agglutination test.
Results:
The egg weight differed nonsignificantly (p>0.05) among breeds, however, breed wise significant variation (p<0.01) was reported in yolk weight. The weight of egg yolk significantly affects the total protein and IgY concentration although these levels per unit of volume did not differ. Total protein was significantly higher (p<0.01) in KalingaBrown and Gramapriya as compared to Vanraja and BlackRock. Non-significant (p>0.05) difference among breed was found in total protein of egg yolk and chick. The IgY concentration in hens, egg yolk and chick was found to be in the range of 5.35±0.63-5.83±0.65, 2.3±0.1-2.6±0.2, and 1.3±0.11-1.7±0.16 mg/ml, respectively which is uniform and independent of total protein concentration at all the three levels. Significant breed variations were not observed in maternal IgY transfer from breeding hens to chicks and were 25.62±1.42-36.06±4.34% of total IgY in parent flock. Moderate to higher rate of seroprevalence with peak titers of 1:640 against Salmonella-specific antibodies was observed in only 41.6% of breeding hens.
Conclusion:
No significant difference in the rate of transfer of IgY was observed in four breeds studied (viz., Vanraja, Gramapriya, BlackRock, and KalingaBrown) and moderate seropositivity was detected for Salmonella-specific antibodies in progeny chicks.
Keywords: breeding hens, chicks, maternal immunoglobulin Y, Salmonella antibody, yolk
Introduction
Chicken of all age groups are susceptible to many pathogens if innate immune response by maternal antibody transfer and/or active immune response by foreign materials (vaccine) are not evoked at its full potential [1]. In general, advanced poultry production practice promises full protection by immunization which is cleverly designed by a combination of breeder hen vaccination and active immunization of chicks at appropriate age during early life. Efficacy of breeder hen vaccination is adjudged by quantum of maternal antibodies received by progeny chicks from dam and thereby newly hatched chicks are protected from diseases even if they lack fully developed immune system. The importance of vertical transmission of immunity to provide specific pathogen protection during the early post-hatching period has long been recognized. Immunoglobulin (Ig)-secreting B cells of chick origin have been detected in circulation after 6 days post-hatch [2], meaning that during the first days of the post-hatching period, humoral immunity is totally dependent on the maternal transfer of Igs. In the domestic chicken, 3 classes of Igs have been identified as the homologs of mammalian IgM, IgA, and IgG. Avian IgY is the evolutionary ancestor of mammalian IgG and is the main defense mechanism against systemic infections [3]. Contrary to mammals, who after birth may obtain maternal antibodies in the colostrums, all of the maternal Igs needed to protect the newly hatched chick must be incorporated into the egg before it is laid.
The transfer of IgY from the hen to the chicks is completed in two steps, first transfer of circulating IgY from the hen’s bloodstream into the ovarian follicle (i.e., the egg yolk) and then to the embryo[4]. The natural transfer of antibodies that occurs from hen to chick via the egg yolk can be exploited to produce antibodies specific to a given pathogen, simply by immunizing the laying hens with an antigen from this targeted pathogen [5]. However, despite seropositivity and the presence of maternal antibodies, some of the poultry farms face the problem of disease outbreak, particularly when the pathogen has potential of vertical transmission. Salmonellosis is one such problem which intensifies many folds due to emerging antibiotic resistant Salmonella spp. and increasing zoonotic threat to human population [6]. Thus, overall transfer of maternal antibody and its efficacy depends mainly on individual titers of specific antibody coupled with rate at which prevalence of the pathogen is recorded.
The present study was therefore planned with a view compare the IgY level in laying hens of four different breeds of poultry (viz. Vanraja, Gramapriya, BlackRock, and KalingaBrown) and its relative transfer in egg yolk and chick. Finally, the efficacy of IgY transferred was judged by evaluating the presence of specific (Salmonella) antibodies.
Materials and Methods
Ethical approval
This study was approved by Institutional Animal Ethics Committee of Veterinary College, Anjora, Durg.
Birds under study
Apparently healthy laying hens (40-60 weeks of age) from four different breeds of poultry, viz., Vanraja, Gramapriya, BlackRock, and KalingaBrown were selected on a random basis and reared under optimum feeding (as per BIS) and management condition at Government Poultry Farm, Durg. No additional supplements like IgY and other growth promoters were added in the feed. These hens were vaccinated with Salmonella polyvalent vaccine inactivated (Venky’s). Sufficient numbers of egg were collected, and hatching of eggs was carefully undertaken. Apparently healthy day old chicks from all the four different breeds of poultry were separated immediately after hatching and then used for study within 2-3 h. 12 numbers of samples were studied for each breed of poultry.
Measurement of weight of egg and egg yolk
About 48 eggs were collected from four different breeds (12 numbers from each breed) of poultry. First, each egg was weighed and then broken so that the yolk could be separated from the egg albumin. The yolk was then separated by rolling over filter paper to remove the albumin adhered to it. Weight of each yolk so collected was recorded in gram.
Determination of total protein and IgY in egg yolk
Total protein in egg yolk was measured by colorimetric method using Biuret reagent [7] and the results were expressed as mg/ml. The total IgY concentration in egg yolk was assessed after 7 days of serum collection from breeding hens. Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-precipitationtechnique was performed for purification of IgY as per procedure described by Polson et al. [8] with slight modifications. The concentration of IgY extract was measured by single radial immunodiffussion (SRID) [9]. Two-fold serial dilution (1:2 to 1:32 dilution equivalent to 11.97, 5.9, 3, 1.5, and 0.74 mg/ml of standard antigen concentration, respectively) of purified chicken IgY at 23.8 mg/ml (BangaloreGenei) was used as standards to generate standard curves by plotting the zone annulus area (the area of zone minus the area of well) of the precipitation rings after 18 h diffusionin a moist chamber at room temperature.
Determination of total protein and IgY concentration in breeding hens and their progeny chicks
Serum samples were collected from breeding hens and chicks under study and stored at −20°C in deep freeze. The total IgY concentration in chicks was recorded on the day of hatch. The concentration of total serum protein was measured by colorimetric method using Biuret reagent [7], and the results were expressed as g/dl. IgY concentration in serum was estimated using SRID.
Extent of IgY transfer in four different breeds
Percent transfer of maternal antibody was calculated as below:
Assessment of Salmonella-specific antibodies in breeding hens, egg yolk, and progeny chicks
The Salmonella antigens, viz., Somatic (O) and Flagellar (H) from stock culture were prepared using standard protocol as mentioned in OIE terrestrial manual [10] with slight modifications. Standard titration was carried out with known serum to ensure presence of antigen and stored in a refrigerator at 4°C until required. The presence of Salmonella-specific antibodies was detected in serum samples from breeding hens and chicks and PEG extract for egg yolk using tube agglutination test. The highest dilution of the serum sample that gives a visible agglutination was recorded as the titer of the serum using antigen suspensions.
Results
Weight of egg and yolk
Although, nonsignificant (p>0.05) variation was reported in the egg weight among four breeds (Table-1), but comparatively higher egg weight was observed in KalingaBrown (56.67±1.42 g) as compared to Vanraja (55±1.51 g). However, the weight of the yolk differs significantly (p<0.01) among the breeds studied. Significantly higher yolk weight was found in BlackRock (18.76±0.40g) as compared to Gramapriya (15.82±0.27 g) and KalingaBrown (17.06±0.38 g).
Table-1.
Egg weight and yolk weight of four different breeds of poultry.
Particular | Breeds | Level of significance | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vanraja | Gramapriya | BlackRock | KalingaBrown | ||
Egg weight (g±SEM) | 55±1.51 | 55.33±1.66 | 55.83±1.21 | 56.67±1.42 | NS |
Yolk weight (g±SEM) | 18.04±0.37ab | 15.82±0.27c | 18.76±0.40a | 17.06±0.38b | ** |
Means having different superscripts in a row differs significantly.
p<0.01, NS=Not significant, SEM=Standard error of mean
Total protein
Total protein (Table-2) in breeding hens was found to be significantly higher (p<0.01) in KalingaBrown and Gramapriya (5.69±0.41 and 5.18±0.31 g/dl, respectively) as compared to Vanraja and BlackRock (3.54±0.30 and 3.76±0.30, respectively). Nonsignificant (p>0.05) difference in total protein was recorded in egg yolk (164±1.82-175±6.03 mg/ml) and chick (2.03±0.10-2.38±0.16 g/dl).
Table-2.
Total protein levels in breeding hens, egg yolk and chicks in four different breeds of poultry.
Source of samples | Breeds | Level of significance | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vanraja | Gramapriya | BlackRock | KalingaBrown | ||
Breeding hens (g/dl±SEM) | 3.54±0.30b | 5.18±0.31a | 3.76±0.30b | 5.69±0.41a | ** |
Egg yolk (mg/ml±SEM) | 168±7.94 | 164±1.82 | 175±6.03 | 171.62±5.81 | NS |
Chick (g/dl±SEM) | 2.27±0.11 | 2.30±0.07 | 2.38±0.16 | 2.03±0.10 | NS |
Means having different superscripts in a row differs significantly. NS=Not significant;
Highly significant (p<0.01), SEM=Standard error of mean
IgY concentration
Nonsignificant (p>0.05) differences in IgY concentration were recorded among different breeds of poultry. The IgY concentration ranged from 5.35±0.63-5.83±0.65, 2.3±0.1-2.6±0.2, and 1.3±0.11-1.7±0.16 mg/ml in hens, egg yolk, and chicks, respectively (Table-3).
Table-3.
IgY levels in breeding hens, egg yolk and chicks in four different breeds of poultry.
Source of samples | Breeds | Level of significance | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vanraja | Gramapriya | BlackRock | KalingaBrown | ||
Breeding hens (mg/ml±SEM) | 5.83±0.65 | 5.35±0.63 | 5.42±0.70 | 5.59±0.69 | NS |
Egg yolk (mg/ml±SEM) | 2.4±0.1 | 2.3±0.1 | 2.6±0.2 | 2.5±0.3 | NS |
Chick (mg/ml±SEM) | 1.5±0.16 | 1.3±0.11 | 1.7±0.16 | 1.5±0.08 | NS |
NS=Not significant, SEM=Standard error of mean, IgY=Immunoglobulin Y
Extent of IgY transfer in four different breeds
The extent of IgY transfer were nonsignificant (p>0.05) among different breeds (Table-4). The transfer of IgY from breeding hens to egg yolk, egg yolk to chick and breeding hens to chick were in range of 46.39±1.42-54.92±5.3%, 54.39±1.93-66.52±1.99%, and 25.62±1.42-36.06±4.34%, respectively.
Table-4.
Percentage transfer of IgY from breeding hens to egg yolk and chicks in four different breeds of poultry.
Sources of samples | Breed wise transfer (%±SEM) | Level of significance | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vanraja | Gramapriya | BlackRock | KalingaBrown | ||
Breeding hens to egg yolk | 46.39±1.42 | 51.10±3.39 | 54.92±5.3 | 54.86±6.1 | NS |
Egg yolk to chicks | 60.46±3.70 | 54.39±1.93 | 66.52±1.99 | 58.09±2.21 | NS |
Breeding hens to chicks | 26.84±1.82 | 25.62±1.42 | 36.06±4.34 | 30.34±2.45 | NS |
NS=Not significant, SEM=Standard error of mean, IgY=Immunoglobulin Y
Salmonella-specific passive transfer of IgY
In this study, 79.16% of the serum samples from breeding hens were found to be seropositive for O antigen while 18.75% for H antigen (Table-5). In fact, only 2-10% of total specific antibody in hens is transferred to chicks. Titer of Specific antibodies against Salmonella in breeding hens among different breeds is shown in Table-6. More than 1:640 antibody titer for O antigen was recorded in 41.6% (20) samples, however, only 8% antibody titer was observed for H antigen.
Table-5.
Seroprevalence of specific antibodies against Salmonella in breeding hens.
Breed | Total number of samples | Number of samples positive | Percentage positive | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
O antigen | H antigen | O antigen | H antigen | ||
Vanraja | 12 | 10 | 4 | 83.3 | 33.3 |
Gramapriya | 12 | 11 | 3 | 91.7 | 25.0 |
BlackRock | 12 | 9 | 2 | 75 | 16.6 |
KalingaBrown | 12 | 8 | UD | 66.6 | - |
Total | 48 | 38 | 9 | 79.16 | 18.75 |
UD=Undetectable
Table-6.
Titer of specific antibodies against Salmonella in breeding hens in different breeds.
Antibody titre | Number of samples positive (%) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vanraja | Gramapriya | BlackRock | KalingaBrown | |||||
O antigen | H antigen | O antigen | H antigen | O antigen | H antigen | O antigen | H antigen | |
640 | 5 (41.6) | - | 7 (58.3) | - | 7 (58.3) | 1 (8) | 1 (8) | - |
320 | 3 (25) | 4 (33.3) | 2 (16.6) | 3 (25) | 2 (16.6) | 1 (8) | 4 (33.3) | - |
160 | 2 (16.6) | - | 2 (16.6) | 3 (25) | - | 3 (25) | 3 (25) | - |
80 | 1 (8) | 3 (25) | 1 (8) | 3 (25) | 2 (16.6) | 2 (16.6) | - | 2 (16.6) |
<80 | 1 (8) | 5 (41.6) | - | 3 (25) | 1 (8) | 5 (41.6) | 4 (33.3) | 10 (83.33) |
Total number of samples from each breeds 12
Data recording and statistical analysis
Data were analyzed by applying general linear model for factorial experiments using SPSS computer software package (Version 16.0.0.247© 2007). Duncan’s multiple range tests were done to make specific treatment comparisons for values that were found significant by ANOVA.
Discussion
The difference in the total protein concentration in different breeds of breeding hen may be due to difference in the genetic makeup as the total serum protein is influenced by breed, age, physiological state, environment and antigen exposure and the levels can be extremely variable [11]. Values of serum protein concentration in breeding hens are well supported by El-Sheikh et al. [12]. On contrary, slightly lower values were reported by Malakian et al. [13]. The findings of total serum protein in chicks (2.03±0.10-2.38±0.16) are also in accordance with those reported by Bowes et al. [14]. Low serum protein in chicks as compared to hens in this study are in accordance with findings of Kaneko [15], who observed that concentration of protein is significantly lower in young animals than in adults. Some relevant reports revealed that the total proteins are the yolk precursors, which are synthesized in the liver and transported via the plasma to the ovary where they were incorporated in the oocyte [16]. In contrast to present observation, Li et al. [17] reported higher values of protein in egg yolk.
The IgY concentration in hens and chicks during present work are in congruence with the findings of Hamal et al.[18]. In agreement with present observation, Carlander et al. [19] also reported different levels of IgY/mL of egg yolk among strains, however, higher values (9.3-11.3 mg/g) were recorded by Ulmer-Franco et al., [20]. Immunization of hens yielded higher IgY level in yolk [21]. Likewise present finding, Sun et al., [22] reported significant correlation among IgY levels in hen serum, yolk, and offspring serum in White Leghorn, Silkie, and Dongxiang blue-shelled chickens. Varied concentration of IgY might be attributed to different techniques used for extraction, purification, and concentration of IgY by different authors, as purity of the extract by PEG precipitation technique may be around 80% only [23]. However, age and feeding condition might had no or very little effect on IgY concentration as birds were of uniform age groups and optimum and uniform feeding conditions were applied during present investigation.
As regards the total protein and IgY concentration per ml egg yolk, there was no significant difference. As the total weight of yolk is less as observed in Gramapriya (15.82±0.27 g), there was proportionate decrease in the concentration of total protein and total IgY. Hence, the total protein and IgY concentration per egg yolk were found to be significantly different in four breeds studied.
Yolk weight observed are in accordance with the findings of Niranjan et al. [24] who also reported a significant difference in yolk weight of Vanraja and Gramapriya breeds. This is also in conformity with reports of Haunshi et al. [25]. Similar to present finding, Li et al. [17] observed that weight of yolk have direct effect on total protein and IgY levels. The high levels of IgY might be because of the prior immunization of hens with bovine serum albumin. Differences reported in this study might be due to the difference in the method used, as the PEG extraction method yield high levels of IgY from egg yolk [26]. The IgY concentration by PEG extraction method yielded almost twice than that of other methods.
Very young chicks are susceptible to many pathogens during the first few weeks of age because their immune system is not fully developed; hence, maternal antibodies are the primary means of antigen-specific protection. There are many reports in the literature regarding the transfer of pathogen-specific antibodies from hens to their chicks via the egg, and their role in the protection of newly hatched chicks from the pathogens [18,27]. It was also observed that the amount of IgY deposited in the egg and thereby transferred to the offspring were directly related to the circulating levels of IgY in the dam. During present work, the percentage transfer expressed as the percentage of the dam’s plasma IgY levels circulating in the blood of day-old chicks (approximately 25-36%) did not differ significantly in the four breeds of chickens. This observation suggests that the amount of maternal antibody present in chick was ultimately decided by the levels in the dam and not the breed. However, this is not in conformity with findings of some earlier workers [28] who have detailed variation in 4 native and crossbred chicken lines with respect to the amounts of inherited maternally derived antibodies in both yolk and day-old chicks.
The present observations on percentage transfer of IgY from hens serum to chick fall in range between 25% and 36%. The differences were, however, not significant when compared among the four breeds which collaborate with findings of Hamal et al. [18]. Antibody levels in the egg yolk are directly proportional to the antibody levels in the dam’s serum [29]. Thus, understanding on the relationship between maternal antibody transfer and endogenous antibody production in layer chicks, one may find its direct application in formulating strategies for protecting chicks, especially during the first few weeks of age when their own immune systems are not yet fully functional. It is reported that only minor quantities of IgA and IgM are transferred to the egg yolk from the plasma cells of the oviduct [30] and 10-15% of immunized hens might be low responders to certain antigens which correspond less IgY in egg yolk [31].
By immunizing the laying hens with an antigen from targeted pathogen induces efficient protection in chicks [5] but it is short-term and is limited to infections present in the hen’s environment at the time of lay [32]. Usually, titer of 100 or more for O antigen is considered significant, and a titer in excess of 200 for H antigen is considered significant for salmonellosis. Seropositivity for Salmonella in this study collaborates with the finding of Betancor et al. [33] who found 24.4% of the birds sera to be positive for Salmonella group O: 9. It may be attributed to change in geographical conditions because a particular serotype was prevalent in a particular area. The specific antibody could not be detected in egg yolk and chicks by tube agglutination test. In fact, only 2-10% of total specific antibody in hens is transferred to chicks. Moderate to low antibody titer in hens render their chicks with undetectable levels of Salmonella antibodies by STAT.
The results revealed as much as cent percent immunity at flock level, out of which, only 41.6% show titer of 1:640 which can be correlated with the reports of Kumar et al. [34] in which the antibody titer was found to be highest (1:1280) which decreased gradually, but the bird remain seropositive until end of observation, i.e. 6th week. The results are slightly lower than the findings of Ahmed et al.[35] who reported seroprevalence of 49.5% in live birds and the rate decreased with advancement of age. It is opined that due to resultant low titer in hen, antibodies in chicks could not reach to level to be detected by STAT. Likewise, Hermans et al.[36] observedtiters of 1:16 000 for Campylobacter jejuni-specific IgY in egg yolk of hens immunized with a C. jejuni whole-cell lysate. This indicates that transfer of IgY to egg yolk is biologically relevant in the overall transfer of Igs into eggs after immunization of hens.
Multiple research studies using hyperimmunization of hens to produce avian [37] and interspecies-specific egg Ig [38] have been carried out. However, faster absorption of yolk sac IgY in chicks from breeding hens, might led the chicks more susceptible to localized pathogen invasion of the yolk sac during the early post-hatching period. In the post-hatching period, protein integrity within the yolk sac is critical for normal absorption of the yolk sac content and for IgY transfer to the circulation of the chick[39]. Hence, factors affecting transfer of IgY to the chick may threaten the chick’s immune status and increase disease susceptibility during the early post-hatching period.
Conclusion
This study reports comparative IgY transfer from parent flock to yolk and then to chicks in four breeds of poultry, viz., Vanraja, Gramapriya, BlackRock, and KalingaBrown. Extent of IgY transfer among four breeds at three different stages wasnonsignificant, as it may depend on individual dam serum IgY concentration. Moderate to high percent seropositivity was detected for Salmonella-specific IgY in hens immunized with polyvalent Salmonella vaccine. This work has initiated investigations to assess the cutoff IgY concentration received by progeny from hen that impart specific immunity to infection in the early period of life in the immunocompetent chicks.
Authors’ Contributions
SDH designed the experiment and RA performed the experiment under supervision of SDH. CS and AKG helped in sample collection and analysis. Manuscript preparation was reviewed and edited by all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The authors are pleased to Dean, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Anjora, Durg, Chhattisgarh, India, for providing the necessary facilities and funding to carry out this work. The study is a part of the post-graduate research work and submitted by the first author to Indira Gandhi KrishiVishwavidyalaya, Raipur.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
References
- 1.Bar-Shira E, Friedman A. Development and adaptations of innate immunity in the gastrointestinal tract of the newly hatched chick. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2006;30(10):930–941. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2005.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lawrence E.C, Arnaud-Battandier F, Grayson J, Koski I.R, Dooley N.J, Muchmore A.V, Blaese R.M. Ontogeny of humoral immune function in normal chickens: A comparison of immunoglobulin-secreting cells in bone marrow, spleen, lungs, and intestine. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 1981;43:450–457. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Warr G.W, Magor K.E, Higgins D.A. IgY: Clues to the origins of modern antibodies. Immunol. Today. 1995;16:392–398. doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(95)80008-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Orlans E. Fowl antibody VIII. A comparison of natural, primary, and secondary erythrocytes in hen sera;their transmission to yolk and chick. Immunol. 1967;12:27–37. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kovacs-Nolan J, Mine Y. Egg yolk antibodies for passive immunity. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2012;3:163–182. doi: 10.1146/annurev-food-022811-101137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yan S, Pendrak M, Abela-Ridder B. An overview of Salmonella typing public health perspectives. Clin. Appl. Immunol. Rev. 2003;4:189–204. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Reinhold J.G. In: Standard Methods of Clinical Biochemistry. Reiner M, editor. Vol. 1. New York & London: Academic Press; 1953. p. 88. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Polson A, Von Wechmar M.B, Van Regenmortel M.V.H. Isolation of viral IgY antibodies from yolks of immunized hens. Immunol.Commun. 1980;9:475–493. doi: 10.3109/08820138009066010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mancini G, Carbonara A.O, Heremans J.F. Immunochemical quantitation of antigens by single radial immunodiffusion. Immunochem. 1965;2:235–254. doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(65)90004-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.OIE. Salmonellosis. Terrestrial Manual. 2010. [Accessed on 04-12-2015]. pp. 9–10. http://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahm/2.09.09_SALMONELLOSIS.pdf .
- 11.Bell D.J. Plasma enzymes. In: Bell D.J, Freeman B.M, editors. Physiology and Biochemistry of the Domestic Fowl. London: Academic Press Inc; 1971. pp. 964–965. [Google Scholar]
- 12.EL-Sheikh A.M.H, Abdalla E.A, Hanafy M.M. Study on productive performance, haematological and immunological parameter in a local strain of chicken as affected by Mannanoligosaccharide under hot climate conditions. Egypt. Poult. Sci. 2009;29(I):287–305. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Malakian M, Hassanabadi A, Heidariniya A. Effects of Safflower seed on performance, carcass traits and blood parameters of Broilers. Res. J. Poult. Sci. 2011;4(2):18–21. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bowes V.A, Julian R.J, Stirtzinger T. Comparison of serum biochemical profiles of male broilers with female broilers and White leghorn chickens. Can. J. Vet. Res. 1989;53:7–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kaneko J.J. In: Serum proteins and the dysproteinemias. Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals. 5th ed. San Diego, London, Boston, New York, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto: Academic Press; 1997. pp. 117–138. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ritchie B.W, Harrison J.G, Harrison R.L. Avian Medicine. Florida: Winger’s Publishing, Inc; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Li X, Nakano T, Sunwoo H.H, Paik B.H, Chae H.S, Sim J.S. Effects of egg and yolk weights on yolk antibody (IgY) production in laying chickens. Poult. Sci. 1998;77:266–270. doi: 10.1093/ps/77.2.266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hamal K.R, Burgess S.C, Pevzner I.Y, Erf G.F. Maternal antibody transfer from dams to their egg yolks, egg whites, and chicks in meat lines of chickens. Poult. Sci. 2006;85:1364–1372. doi: 10.1093/ps/85.8.1364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Carlander D, Wilhelmson M, Larsson A. Immunoglobulin Y level in egg yolk from three chicken genotypes. Food Agric. Immunol. 2003;15(1):35–40. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ulmer-Franco A.M, Cherian G, Quezada N, Fasenko G.M, McMullen L.M. Hatching egg and newly hatched chick yolk sac total IgY content at 3 broiler breeder flock ages. Poult. Sci. 2012;91(3):758–764. doi: 10.3382/ps.2011-01757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Meenatchisundaram S, Michael A. Comparison of four different purification methods for isolation of anti Echiscarinatus antivenom antibodies from immunized chicken egg yolk. Iran. J. Biotechnol. 2010;8:50–55. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sun H, Chen S, Xia C, Guiyun X, Lujiang Q. Effect of transportation duration of 1-day-old chicks on postplacement production performances and pododermatitis of broilers up to slaughter age. Poult. Sci. 2013;92(12):3300–3309. doi: 10.3382/ps.2013-03118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pauly D, Chacana P.A, Calzado E.G, Brembs B, Schade R. IgY technology: Extraction of chicken antibodies from egg yolk by polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation. J. Vis. Exp. 2011;51:3084. doi: 10.3791/3084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Niranjan M, Sharma R.P, Rajkumar U, Chatterjee R.N, Reddy B.L.N, Battacharya T.K. Egg quality traits in chicken varieties developed for backyard poultry farming in India. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 2008;20(12):103–105. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Haunshi S, Doley S, Kadirvel G. Comparative studies on egg, meat and semen qualities of native and improved chicken varieties developed for backyard poultry production. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2010;42(5):1013–1019. doi: 10.1007/s11250-009-9524-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Amir M.P, Rasaee M.J, Qujeq D, Asadikaram G.H.R, Moqhadam M.F. A simple and economical procedure for the purification of immunoglobulin Y from egg yolk by T-Gel chromatography. Iran. J. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2000;1(2):53–57. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Liou J.F, Chang C.W, Tailiu J.J, Yu C.K, Lei H.Y, Chen L.R, Tai C. assive protection effect of chicken egg yolk immunoglobulins on enterovirus 71 infected mice. Vaccine. 2010;28:8189–8196. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.09.089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Abdel-Moneim A.S, Abdel-Gawad M.M.A. Genetic variations in maternal transfer and immune responsiveness to infectious bursal disease virus. Vet. Microbiol. 2006;114:16–24. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.10.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Loeken M.R, Roth R.E. Analysis of maternal IgG subpopulations which are transported into the chicken oocyte. Immunol. 1983;49:21–28. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rose M.E, Orlans E, Buttress N. Immunoglobulin classes in the hen’s egg: their segregation in yolk and white. Eur. J Immunol. 1974;4:521–523. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830040715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Schade R, Calzado E.G, Sarmiento R, Chacana P.A, Porankiewicz-Asplund J, Terzolo H.R. Chicken egg yolk antibodies (IgY-technology): A review of progress in production and use in research and human and veterinary medicine. Altern. Lab. Anim. 2005;33:129–154. doi: 10.1177/026119290503300208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Smith A.L, Beal R. The avian enteric immune system in health and disease. In: Davison F, Kaspers B, Schat K.A, editors. Avian Immunology. New York: Elsevier Ltd; 2008. pp. 243–271. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Betancor L, Pereira M, Martinez A, Giossa G, Fookes M, Flores M, Barrios P, Repiso V, Vignoli R, Cordeiro N, Algorta G, Thomson N, Maskell D, Schelotto F, Chabalgoity J.A. Prevalence of Salmonella enterica in poultry and eggs in Uruguay during an epidemic due to Salmonella enterica Serovarenteritidis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010;48(7):2413–2423. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02137-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kumar S, Sadana J.R, Chaturvedi G.C, Michra S.K. Studies on humoral and cellular immune response in Japanese quail (Coturnixcoturnix japonica) experimentally infected with S. typhimurium. Indian J. Poult. Sci. 2001;36(2):197–200. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ahmed A.K.M, Islam M.T, Haider M.G, Hossain M.M. Seroprevalence and pathology of naturally infected salmonellosis in poultry with isolation and identification of causal agents. J. Bangladesh Agrilc. Univ. 2008;6(2):327–334. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hermans D, Van Steendam K, Verbrugghe E, Verlinden M, Martel A, Seliwiorstow T, Heyndrickx M, Haesebrouck F, De Zutter L, Deforce D, Pasmans F. Passive immunization to reduce Campylobacter jejuni colonization and transmission in broiler chickens. Vet. Res. 2014;45:27. doi: 10.1186/1297-9716-45-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gómez-Verduzco G, Tellez G, Quintana A.L, Isibasi A, Ortiz-Navarrete V. Humoral immune response in breeding hens and protective immunity provided by administration of purified Salmonella Gallinarum porins. Poult. Sci. 2010;89:495–500. doi: 10.3382/ps.2009-00448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Machado Leal Ribeiro A, Rudnik L, Wageck Canal C, RibeiroKratz L, Farias C. Supply of hipperimmunized hen yolks against swine Escherichia coli to control newborn piglets diarrhea. R. Bras. Zootec. 2005;34:1234–1239. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ulmer-Franco A.M. Transfer of chicken immunoglobulin Y (IgY) from the hen to the chick. Avian Biol. Res. 2012;5(2):81–87. [Google Scholar]