Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 1996 Jul;61(1):75–81. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.61.1.75

Emotional, neuropsychological, and organic factors: their use in the prediction of persisting postconcussion symptoms after moderate and mild head injuries.

N S King 1
PMCID: PMC486463  PMID: 8676166

Abstract

BACKGROUND--After mild and moderate head injuries a range of postconcussion symptoms (PCS) are often reported by patients. Both organic and psychogenic factors can contribute to these. Full recovery from PCS usually occurs within three months of the injury. A significant minority, however, continue to experience symptoms beyond this time. To date, no means of identifying these patients early after injury has been reported. This study investigates whether a combination of neuropsychological, emotional, and traditional measures of severity of head injury taken early after the injury can help predict severity of PCS three months after injury. METHODS--50 patients with mild or moderate head injury had a range of measures administered at 7-10 days after injury. These included three tests of divided attention, a PCS rating scale-the Rivermead postconcussion symptoms questionnaire (RPQ), the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS), the impact of event scale (IES), and post-traumatic amnesia. An RPQ was then completed by all patients three months after injury. RESULTS--Stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed with the RPQ score at three months as the dependent measure. A combination of eight of the scores from the early measures gave a multiple correlation coefficient of R = 0.86 accounting for 74% of the variance in RPQ scores. The most predictive individual measures were the HADS and IES. Regression analysis with RPQ score at 7-10 days as dependent measure showed that 10 of the scores gave a coefficient of R = 0.84 accounting for 71% of the variance. CONCLUSIONS--A combination of measures may significantly aid the prediction of persistent PCS. Five measures: HADS, post-traumatic amnesia, SOMC, PASAT, and RPQ are recommended for their predictive value and clinical utility. Independent cross validation studies are required before these results can be generally applied. They do, however, provide valuable indications regarding those measures that are most likely to demonstrate utility.

Full text

PDF
75

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Binder L. M. Persisting symptoms after mild head injury: a review of the postconcussive syndrome. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1986 Aug;8(4):323–346. doi: 10.1080/01688638608401325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bishara S. N., Partridge F. M., Godfrey H. P., Knight R. G. Post-traumatic amnesia and Glasgow Coma Scale related to outcome in survivors in a consecutive series of patients with severe closed-head injury. Brain Inj. 1992 Jul-Aug;6(4):373–380. doi: 10.3109/02699059209034952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bohnen N., Jolles J., Twijnstra A. Neuropsychological deficits in patients with persistent symptoms six months after mild head injury. Neurosurgery. 1992 May;30(5):692–696. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bohnen N., Twijnstra A., Jolles J. Performance in the Stroop color word test in relationship to the persistence of symptoms following mild head injury. Acta Neurol Scand. 1992 Feb;85(2):116–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1992.tb04009.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bohnen N., Twijnstra A., Jolles J. Post-traumatic and emotional symptoms in different subgroups of patients with mild head injury. Brain Inj. 1992 Nov-Dec;6(6):481–487. doi: 10.3109/02699059209008145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Capruso D. X., Levin H. S. Cognitive impairment following closed head injury. Neurol Clin. 1992 Nov;10(4):879–893. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Crawford S., Wenden F. J., Wade D. T. The Rivermead head injury follow up questionnaire: a study of a new rating scale and other measures to evaluate outcome after head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996 May;60(5):510–514. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.60.5.510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dikmen S., McLean A., Temkin N. Neuropsychological and psychosocial consequences of minor head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1986 Nov;49(11):1227–1232. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.49.11.1227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Englander J., Hall K., Stimpson T., Chaffin S. Mild traumatic brain injury in an insured population: subjective complaints and return to employment. Brain Inj. 1992 Mar-Apr;6(2):161–166. doi: 10.3109/02699059209029654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Evans R. W. The postconcussion syndrome and the sequelae of mild head injury. Neurol Clin. 1992 Nov;10(4):815–847. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gronwall D. M. Paced auditory serial-addition task: a measure of recovery from concussion. Percept Mot Skills. 1977 Apr;44(2):367–373. doi: 10.2466/pms.1977.44.2.367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gronwall D. Performance changes during recovery from closed head unjury. Proc Aust Assoc Neurol. 1976;13:143–147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gronwall D., Wrightson P. Delayed recovery of intellectual function after minor head injury. Lancet. 1974 Sep 14;2(7881):605–609. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91939-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Horowitz M., Wilner N., Alvarez W. Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med. 1979 May;41(3):209–218. doi: 10.1097/00006842-197905000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jakobsen J., Baadsgaard S. E., Thomsen S., Henriksen P. B. Prediction of post-concussional sequelae by reaction time test. Acta Neurol Scand. 1987 May;75(5):341–345. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1987.tb05456.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. King N. S., Crawford S., Wenden F. J., Moss N. E., Wade D. T. The Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire: a measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability. J Neurol. 1995 Sep;242(9):587–592. doi: 10.1007/BF00868811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Levin H. S., Mattis S., Ruff R. M., Eisenberg H. M., Marshall L. F., Tabaddor K., High W. M., Jr, Frankowski R. F. Neurobehavioral outcome following minor head injury: a three-center study. J Neurosurg. 1987 Feb;66(2):234–243. doi: 10.3171/jns.1987.66.2.0234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. MacFlynn G., Montgomery E. A., Fenton G. W., Rutherford W. Measurement of reaction time following minor head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984 Dec;47(12):1326–1331. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.47.12.1326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Middleboe T., Andersen H. S., Birket-Smith M., Friis M. L. Minor head injury: impact on general health after 1 year. A prospective follow-up study. Acta Neurol Scand. 1992 Jan;85(1):5–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Minderhoud J. M., Boelens M. E., Huizenga J., Saan R. J. Treatment of minor head injuries. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1980;82(2):127–140. doi: 10.1016/0303-8467(80)90007-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rimel R. W., Giordani B., Barth J. T., Boll T. J., Jane J. A. Disability caused by minor head injury. Neurosurgery. 1981 Sep;9(3):221–228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rutherford W. H., Merrett J. D., McDonald J. R. Symptoms at one year following concussion from minor head injuries. Injury. 1979 Feb;10(3):225–230. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(79)90015-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rutherford W. H. Sequelae of concussion caused by minor head injuries. Lancet. 1977 Jan 1;1(8001):1–4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(77)91649-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wrightson P., Gronwall D. Time off work and symptoms after minor head injury. Injury. 1981 May;12(6):445–454. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(81)90161-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zigmond A. S., Snaith R. P. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES