Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2016 Apr 22;7:1576–1583. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.04.028

Satellite data for Singapore, Manila and Kuala Lumpur city growth analysis

Mukesh Singh Boori a,b,d,⁎,1, Komal Choudhary a, Alexander Kupriyanov a,c, Viktor Kovelskiy a
PMCID: PMC4865670  PMID: 27222856

Abstract

This data article presents satellite data related to city growth of Singapore, Manila and Kuala Lumpur cities. The data were collected from NASA and USGS websites. A method has been developed for city built-up density from city center to outward till 50 km by using satellite data. These data sets consists three decade Landsat images. A detailed description is given to show how to use this data to produce urban growth maps. The urban growth maps have been used to know the changes and growth pattern in the Southeast Asia Cities.

Keywords: Urban growth, City density, Landsat satellite data, Change detection, Remote sensing, GIS, Singapore, Manila, Kuala Lumpur

Specifications Table

Subject area Earth Science and Geo-informatics
More specific subject area Remote Sensing and GIS
Type of data Satellite image, table, figure, graph
How data was acquired Collect from field and download from NASA and USGS website
Data format Analyzed
Experimental factors Image processing
Experimental features Image classification, combined satellite data and socio-economic data in GIS with the help of ArcGIS 10.2 software
Data source location Scientific Research Laboratory of Automated Systems of Scientific Research (SRL-35), Samara State Aerospace University, Samara, Russia
Data accessibility Data is in this data article

Value of the data

  • City growth and land use/cover data are utilize in maximum type of remote sensing data applications such as hydrology, agriculture, forest, urban growth/city planning, vulnerability, natural resources and sustainable development etc.

  • Socio-economic or secondary data such a general amenities, facilities and field data are useful to verify the satellite data and to know the changes of an area.

  • Data of urban expansion, land use/cover are very useful to local government and urban planners for the future plans to sustainable development of the city.

1. Data

The following multi-sensor, multi-resolution and multi-temporal satellite data were used: Landsat 5 TM (Thematic Mapper) for 1989, Landsat 7 ETM+ (Enhanced Thematic Mapper plus) for 2001 and Landsat 8 OLI (Operational Land Imager) for 2014, an image captured by a different type of sensors with less than 20% cloud cover. In addition, Landsat images are frequently updated and are available free of charge through the Global Land Cover Facility repository [1], [2], [3]. All data were downloaded free of charge from NASA and USGS website. Fig. 1 presents city growth of Singapore, Manila and Kuala Lumpur in the last three decades.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Singapore, Manila and Kuala Lumpur city growth from 1989, 2001 and 2014.

2. Experimental design, materials and methods

To convert all row satellite data into meaningful data, first rectified and georeferenced the data in UTM projection (WGS 84 datum). To increase the quality of satellite data, all data processed through band ratio, classification and in last change detection techniques [4], [5], [6]. All satellite data were preferred to retain the spatial details such as original pixel value and size. Therefore the satellite data were kept without changing their pixel sizes despite the possible varying accuracy level of classification with the different spatial, spectral and radiometric resolutions. All nine satellite images were classified through maximum likelihood supervised classification in ArcGIS 10.2 software [7], [8], [9]. To create a closer correspondence between the produced output data maps, the classification was done by only considering four main classes: urban/built-up area, agriculture land, forest land (tree/park) and water body [10], [11], [12]. The produced data maps were presented in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Land cover and multi-buffer ring zones around city center of Singapore, Manila and Kuala Lumpur for the year of 1989, 2001 and 2014.

After classification multi-buffer rings were created for every 1 km distance from 1 to 50 km from city center to outward. Than intersect with classified data maps (land cover) for all three dates [13], [14], [15]. Later on all land cover classes area were measured from 1 to 50 km distance and derive urban density according to following formula.

Urban density=Sattlementarea/ringTotalringarea (1)

In all buffer rings only urban/built-up area was calculated in place of whole ring area. After producing complete land use data maps, the total coverage of different classes were determined. Using this information, we calculated the water, forest, vegetation and built-up area per capita for all the study years (Table 1).

Table 1.

Singapore, Manila and Kuala Lumpur land use/cover classes for 1989, 2001 and 2014.

Area_1989 % Area_2001 % Area_2014 %
Singapore
Settlements 196.88 66.25 383.23 69.71 464.69 70.19
Agriculture 34.67 11.67 80.26 14.60 80.84 12.21
Forest 60.74 20.44 62.58 11.38 89.65 13.54
Water 4.89 1.65 23.64 4.30 26.87 4.06
Total 297.18 100.00 549.71 100.00 662.05 100.00


 

 

 

 

 

 


Manila
Settlements 189.61 96.70 416.87 77.08 776.65 69.12
Agriculture 6.37 3.24 110.14 20.37 243.89 21.71
Forest 2.19 1.11 9.44 1.75 98.59 8.77
Water 0.1 0.05 4.36 0.81 4.42 0.39
Total 196.08 100.00 540.81 100.00 1123.55 100.00


 

 

 

 

 

 


Kuala Lumpur
Settlements 456.99 51.81 1098.48 60.22 1663.23 64.36
Agriculture 345.46 39.16 520.40 28.53 699.21 27.06
Forest 70.50 7.99 188.74 10.35 209.99 8.13
Water 9.18 1.04 16.54 0.91 11.68 0.45
Total 882.13 100.00 1824.16 100.00 2584.11 100.00

In order to evaluate the spatial distribution of urban expansion intensity, we adapted an indicator called annual urban growth rate (AGR) for evaluating the ‘urbanization’ speed of per unit area [16], [17]. AGR is defined as follows:

AGR=UAn+iUAinTAn+i×100% (2)

where TAn+i is the total land area of the target unit to be calculated at the time point of i+n; UAn+i and UAi the urban area or built-up area in the target unit at time i+n and i, respectively and n is the interval of the calculated period (in years).

2.1. Urban/built-up area, city density and landscape

With the help of ArcGIS 10.2 software, urban/built up area data were created. After creation of built-up data, city density data were generated by Eq. (1) from city center to 50 km outward the city for Singapore, Manila and Kuala Lumpur cities (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Singapore, Manila and Kuala Lumpur city density from 1 to 50 km distance for the year of 1989, 2001 and 2014.

As Fig. 3 represents three dates data of urban density so this data can be utilize as urban growth rate data of Singapore, Manila and Kuala Lumpur city.

With the help of supervised classification, previous knowledge and experience, landscape data were created for all three cities for the year of 1989, 2001 and 2014. Here a trimble hand-held GPS with an accuracy of 10 m was used to map and collect the coordinates of important landscape features during pre- and post-classification field visits in order to prepare land-use and land-cover datasets. Fig. 4 shows landscape data with urban growth and urban density datasets for Singapore, Manila and Kuala Lumpur cities from 1989 to 2014.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Singapore, Manila and Kuala Lumpur land cover class density from 1 to 50 km distance for the year of 1989, 2001 and 2014.

Acknowledgments

This data work is financially supported by the Russian Scientific Foundation (RSF), Grant no. 14-31-00014 “Establishment of a Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Earth Remote Sensing”.

References

  • 1.Wu Kai-ya, Hao Z. Land use dynamics, built-up land expansion patterns, and driving forces analysis of the fast-growing Hangzhou metropolitan area, eastern China (1978–2008) Appl. Geogr. 2012;34:137–145. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.M.S. Boori, R.R. Ferraro, Global land cover classification based on microwave polarization and gradient ratio (MPGR), in: I. Ivan, I. Benenson, B. Jiang, J. Horák, J. Haworth, T. Inspektor (Eds.), Geo-informatics for Intelligent Transportation, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, vol. 71, 2015, pp. 17–37, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11463-7-2.
  • 3.Dewan A.M., Yamaguchi Y., Rahman M.Z. Dynamics of land use/cover changes and the analysis of landscape fragmentation in Dhaka metropolitan, Bangladesh. GeoJ. 2012;77(3):315–330. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Boori M.S., Vozenilek V., Choudhary K. Land use/cover disturbances due to tourism in Jeseniky Mountain, Czech Republic: a remote sensing and GIS based approach. Egypt. J. Remote Sens. Space Sci. 2015;17(3):01–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lillesand T.M., Kiefer R.W. John Wiley and Sons; New York: 1999. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.J.R. Anderson, E. Hardey, J. Roach, R.E. Witmer, A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data, US geological survey professional paper, Washington, DC, vol. 964, 1976, p. 28.
  • 7.Boori M.S., Vozenilek V., Choudhary K. Exposer intensity, vulnerability index and landscape change assessment in Olomouc, Czech Republic. ISPRS: Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2015;XL-7/W3:771–776. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jensen J.R., Im J. Remote sensing change detection in urban environments. In: Jensen R.R., Gatrell J.D., McLean D., editors. Geo-Spatial Technologies in Urban Environments: Policy, Practice and Pixels. 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag; Heidelberg: 2007. pp. 7–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.M.S. Boori, V. Vozenilek, Land-cover disturbances due to tourism in Jeseniky mountain region: a remote sensing and GIS based approach, SPIE: Remote Sensing, vol. 9245, 92450T, 2014, pp. 01–11, http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2065112.
  • 10.United Nations, World urbanization prospects, The 2014 Revision, New York, 2014.
  • 11.M.S. Boori, K. Choudhary, A. Kupriyanoy, V. Kovelskiy, Four decades urban growth and land use change in Samara Russia through remote sensing and GIS techniques, SPIE: Remote Sensing and Image Formation, vol. 9817, 2015, pp. 01–07, http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2227992.
  • 12.Haiyong D., Shi W. Land-use/land-cover change and its influence on surface temperature: a case study in Beijing City. Int. J. Remote. Sens. 2013;34(15):5503–5517. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Boori M.S., Kuznetsov A.V., Choudhary K., Kupriyanoy A. Satellite image analysis to evaluate the urban growth and land use changes in the city of Samara from 1975 to 2015. Comput. Opt. 2015;39(5):818–822. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Feizizadeh B., Helali H. Comparison pixel-based, object based image analysis and effective parameters in classification land cover e land use of west province Azerbaijan. J. Geogr. Res. 2010;47:73–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.M.S. Boori, M. Netzband, V. Vozenilek, K. Choudhary, Urban growth in last three decades in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia IEEE: Urban Remote Sensing Event (JURSE), 2015 Joint, 2015e, pp. 01–04, http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.222799210.1109/JURSE.2015.7120536.
  • 16.Were K.O., Dick Ø.B. Remotely sensing the spatial and temporal landcover changes in Eastern Mau forest reserve and Lake Nakuru drainage basin. Appl. Geogr. 2013;41:75–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Boori M.S., Choudhary K., Kupriyanoy A., Kovelskiy V. Urbanization data of Samara City, Russia. Data Brief. 2016;6:885–889. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.01.056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES