Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 May 13;6:25987. doi: 10.1038/srep25987

The vitamin D receptor gene ApaI polymorphism is associated with increased risk of renal cell carcinoma in Chinese population

Chunming Yang 1, Jia LI 2, Yan Li 3, Di Wu 3, Chengguang Sui 3, Youhong Jiang 3, Fandong Meng 3,a
PMCID: PMC4865864  PMID: 27174575

Abstract

Molecular epidemiologic studies previously reported that 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2 D3) appears to influence cancer risk. It exerts its activity through the intracellular vitamin D receptor (VDR), which regulates the transcription of genes. This study aimed to investigate the genetic association of VDR polymorphisms with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) risk in the Chinese population. The genotypes of five VDR polymorphisms (TaqI, BsmI, Cdx-2, ApaI, and FokI) were studied using polymerase chain reaction in 302 RCC patients and 302 healthy controls. ApaI variant AA and AC genotypes were found to be associated with a significantly increased risk of RCC compared with the CC genotype (OR = 2.60, 95% CI = 1.39–4.85 for AA vs. CC, and OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.08–2.13 for AC vs. CC). The AA genotype was also associated with a higher Fuhrman grade (OR = 2.87, 95% CI = 1.15–7.16 for AA vs. CC). No significant difference was found between the other four VDR polymorphisms and RCC risk. Our study suggests that VDR ApaI genotypes may be involved in the increased risk and progression of RCC in the Chinese Han population.


Kidney cancer is the 13th most common malignancy worldwide, with around 270,000 cases diagnosed annually, and 116,000 people dying each year from the disease1. Approximately 90% of all kidney cancers are renal cell carcinomas (RCC), which are the most common type of urological cancer with a high prevalence in older men (>70 years of age)2,3. The causes of RCC are not completely known, although its development is associated with several risk factors, including obesity, smoking, hypertension, ethnicity, age, and family history4.

Epidemiological and laboratory investigations have shown that vitamin D deficiency is associated with several diseases, including autoimmune diseases, tuberculosis and cancer. Vitamin D maintains calcium homeostasis and regulates the growth and differentiation of various malignant tumors. Its activity is mediated through the binding of its active form, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2 D3), to the vitamin D receptor (VDR), causing a conformational change and leading to dimerization with the retinoid X receptor. The dimeric complex then interacts with vitamin D response elements in target genes involved in cell division, cell adhesion, and function, resulting in changes in gene activity5. At the cellular level, the stimulation of VDR and retinoid receptors can cause the inhibition of cell proliferation and angiogenesis, as well as the induction of differentiation and apoptosis6. Because vitamin D activity is mediated by the VDR, the analysis of VDR genetic variation may elucidate the role of vitamin D in RCC etiology.

VDR is located on the long arm of chromosome 12q12-q14, and several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the gene have been identified that may influence cancer risk. Each polymorphism is named according to the restriction site that was initially used to identify it. The FokI (rs2228570) polymorphism is located at the first potential start site7, and alters an ACG codon that results in the generation of an additional start codon8. BsmI (rs1544410), ApaI (rs7975232), and TaqI (rs731236) polymorphisms are located in the 3′ untranslated region (UTR), and are all involved in regulating the stability of VDR mRNA9. Five well-known SNPs of human VDR, FokI (C/T), BsmI (A/G), ApaI (A/C), TaqI (T/C), and Cdx2 (A/G), were previously extensively studied for their association with cancer risk8,10. However, there is still a scarcity of data regarding the association of VDR genotype with RCC patients, and the results has not been consistent11,12,13.

Therefore, to determine whether variation in vitamin D receptor modify RCC risk, we conducted a case–control study to evaluate the association between VDR variants and RCC risk in the Chinese Han population.

Results

Table 1 shows the general characteristics of cases and controls that were included in the present study. The mean age of cases was 54.76 years (standard deviation (SD) 10.96; range, 27–80 years), and that of controls was 54.17 years (SD 12.35; range, 24–87 years). No significant difference was observed between RCC patients and controls regarding age or sex. However, significantly more smokers (P = 0.006) and hypertensive patients (P = 0.029) were observed in the RCC group compared with the controls (Supplementary Information). Of the 302 RCC patients, 229 (75.83%) had RCC stage I–II, while 241 (79.80%) had RCC grade stage I–II.

Table 1. Clinicopathologic characteristics of the renal cell carcinoma cases and controls.

Parameter Cases, n (%) Control, n (%) P
Age (years)
 Mean ± SD 54.76 ± 10.96 54.17 ± 12.35 0.530
 Range 27–80 24–87  
Sex
 Male 202 (66.89%) 195 (64.57%) 0.548
 Female 100 (33.11%) 107 (35.43%)  
Hypertension
 No 217 (71.86%) 240 (79.47%) 0.029
 Yes 85 (28.14%) 62 (20.53%)  
Smoking
 Never 204 (67.55%) 234 (77.48%) 0.006
 Ever 98 (32.45%) 68 (22.52%)  
Stage
 T1 186 (61.59%)    
 T2 43 (14.24%)    
 T3 36 (11.92%)    
 T4 37 (12.25%)    
Grade
 I 83 (27.48%)    
 II 158 (52.32%)    
 III 53 (17.55%)    
 IV 8 (2.65%)    
Histopathologic subtype
 Clear cell renal cell carcinoma 241 (79.80%)    
 Papillary renal cell carcinoma 14 (4.64%)    
 Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma 20 (6.62%)    
 Multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma 22 (7.28%)    
 Unclassified renal cell carcinoma 5 (1.66%)    

Association of VDR polymorphisms with RCC risk

Genotype and allele distributions of VDR polymorphisms in the cases and controls are shown in Table 2. In our study population, all genotype distributions in the control subjects were in agreement with HWE (Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium) (P = 0.82, P = 0.26, P = 0.69, P = 0.08, and P = 0.33 for TaqI, BsmI, Cdx-2, ApaI, and FokI, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that patients with AA and AC genotypes of the ApaI polymorphism had a significantly increased RCC risk compared with those with the CC genotype (adjusted OR = 2.60, 95% CI = 1.39–4.85 for AA vs. CC; OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.08–2.13 for AC vs. CC). The ApaI polymorphism A allele was also associated with an increased risk of RCC between cases and controls (P = 0.001). However, no significant association was found between variant genotypes of the other four VDR polymorphisms and risk of RCC (P > 0.05).

Table 2. Genotype and allele frequencies of the VDR polymorphisms in RCC cases and controls.

Genotype Cases, n (%) Controls, n (%) Crude OR (95% CI) P value Adjusted OR (95% CI)* P value*
TaqI (rs731236)
 TT 261 (86.42%) 272 (90.07%) 1.00 (reference)   1.00 (reference)  
 CT + CC 41 (13.58%) 30 (9.93%) 1.42 (0.86–2.35) 0.166 1.43 (0.86–2.36) 0.169
 T allele 563 (93.21%) 574 (95.03%) 1.00 (reference)      
 C allele 41 (6.79%) 30 (4.97%) 1.39 (0.86–2.26) 0.180 1.41 (0.85–2.35) 0.179
BsmI (rs1544410)
 GG 255 (84.44%) 265 (87.75%) 1.00 (reference)   1.00 (reference)  
 AG + AA 47 (15.56%) 37 (12.25%) 1.32 (0.83–2.10) 0.241 1.32 (0.83–2.11) 0.242
 G allele 557 (92.22%) 567 (93.87%) 1.00 (reference)      
 A allele 47 (7.78%) 37 (6.13%) 1.29 (0.83–2.02) 0.259 1.32 (0.83–2.10) 0.244
Cdx–2 (rs11568820)
 AA 100 (33.11%) 98 (32.45%) 1.00 (reference)   1.00 (reference)  
 AG 153 (50.66%) 151 (50.00%) 0.99 (0.69–1.42) 0.969 0.96 (0.67–1.38) 0.832
 GG 49 (16.23%) 53 (17.55%) 0.91 (0.56–1.46) 0.686 0.90 (0.56–1.46) 0.678
 AG + GG 202 (66.89%) 204 (67.55%) 0.97 (0.69–1.36) 0.862 0.97 (0.69–1.36) 0.853
 A allele 353 (58.44%) 347 (57.45%) 1.00 (reference)      
 G allele 251 (41.56%) 257 (42.55%) 0.96 (0.76–1.21) 0.727 0.94 (0.72–1.22) 0.632
ApaI (rs7975232)
 CC 114 (37.75%) 149 (49.34%) 1.00 (reference)   1.00 (reference)  
 AC 153 (50.66%) 135 (44.70%) 1.48 (1.062.07) 0.022 1.52 (1.082.13) 0.016
 AA 35 (11.59%) 18 (5.96%) 2.54 (1.374.72) 0.003 2.60 (1.394.85) 0.003
 AC + AA 188 (62.25%) 153 (50.66%) 1.61 (1.162.22) 0.004 1.60 (1.162.22) 0.004
 C allele 381 (63.08%) 433 (71.69%) 1.00 (reference)      
 A allele 223 (36.92%) 171 (28.31%) 1.49 (1.171.90) 0.001 1.75 (1.312.32) <0.001
FokI (rs2228570)
 CC 70 (23.18%) 79 (26.16%) 1.00 (reference)      
 CT 171 (56.62%) 159 (52.65%) 1.21 (0.82–1.79) 0.327 1.15 (0.78–1.71) 0.476
 TT 61 (20.20%) 64 (21.19%) 1.08 (0.67–1.73) 0.764 1.05 (0.65–1.70) 0.835
 CT + TT 232 (76.82%) 223 (73.84%) 1.17 (0.81–1.70) 0.396 1.16 (0.80–1.68) 0.444
 C allele 311 (51.49%) 317 (52.48%) 1.00 (reference)      
 T allele 293 (48.51%) 287 (47.52%) 1.04 (0.83–1.30) 0.730 1.05 (0.80–1.37) 0.746

*Adjusted for age, gender, smoking and hypertension in multivariate unconditional logistic regression model. The P values < 0.05 are indicated in bold.

VDR polymorphisms and RCC clinicopathologic characteristics

Table 3 shows the distribution of cases according to available RCC histopathological characteristics. We compared the various risk factors with stage and grade of RCC. The AA genotype of the ApaI polymorphism was found to be associated with a higher Fuhrman grade (OR = 2.87, 95% CI = 1.15–7.16 for AA vs. CC), but not with the AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) stages of RCC (P = 0.766). There were no significant associations between the other four VDR polymorphisms and AJCC stages or Fuhrman grades in all patients.

Table 3. Association between VDR polymorphisms and grade and stage of RCC in all patients.

Genotype Grade grouping, n (%)
Adjusted OR (95% CI)* P value* Stage grouping, n (%)
Adjusted OR (95% CI)* P value*
III + IV I + II III + IV I + II
TaqI (rs731236)
 TT 54 (88.52%) 207 (85.89%) 1.00 (reference)   59 (80.82%) 202 (88.21%) 1.00 (reference)  
 CT + CC 7 (11.48%) 34 (14.11%) 1.02 (0.41–2.55) 0.962 14 (19.18%) 27 (11.79%) 1.79 (0.86–3.69) 0.117
BsmI (rs1544410)
 GG 49 (80.33%) 206 (85.48%) 1.00 (reference)   59 (80.82%) 196 (85.59%) 1.00 (reference)  
 AG + AA 12 (19.67%) 35 (14.52%) 1.63 (0.75–3.53) 0.215 14 (19.18%) 33 (14.41%) 1.41 (0.70–2.84) 0.338
Cdx–2 (rs11568820)
 AA 26 (42.62%) 74 (30.71%) 1.00 (reference)   24 (32.88%) 76 (33.19%) 1.00 (reference)  
 AG 25 (40.98%) 128 (53.11%) 0.55 (0.29–1.05) 0.071 37 (50.68%) 116 (50.65%) 0.98 (0.54–1.79) 0.959
 GG 10 (16.40%) 39 (16.18%) 0.63 (0.27–1.48) 0.287 12 (16.44%) 37 (16.16%) 1.06 (0.47–2.37) 0.896
 AG + GG 35 (57.38%) 167 (69.29%) 0.60 (0.33–1.09) 0.096 49 (67.12%) 153 (66.81%) 1.01 (0.57–1.76) 0.992
ApaI (rs7975232)
 CC 18 (29.51%) 96 (39.83%) 1.00 (reference)   30 (41.10%) 84 (36.68%) 1.00 (reference)  
 CA 31 (50.82%) 122 (50.62%) 1.40 (0.72–2.76) 0.325 33 (45.20%) 120 (52.40%) 0.83 (0.47–1.49) 0.541
 AA 12 (19.67%) 23 (9.55%) 2.87 (1.157.16) 0.023 10 (13.70%) 25 (10.92%) 1.14 (0.48–2.68) 0.766
 CA + AA 43 (70.49%) 145 (60.17%) 1.55 (0.83–2.91) 0.170 43 (58.90%) 145 (63.32%) 0.86 (0.50–1.49) 0.863
FokI (rs2228570)
 CC 13 (21.31%) 57 (23.65%) 1.00 (reference)   17 (23.29%) 53 (23.14%) 1.00 (reference)  
 CT 31 (50.82%) 140 (58.09%) 0.87 (0.41–1.85) 0.725 38 (52.05%) 133 (58.08%) 0.80 (0.41–1.57) 0.524
 TT 17 (27.87%) 44 (18.26%) 1.65 (0.69–3.91) 0.259 18 (24.66%) 43 (18.78%) 1.20 (0.54–2.66) 0.650
 CT + TT 48 (78.69%) 184 (76.35%) 1.08 (0.53–2.18) 0.839 56 (76.71%) 176 (76.86%) 0.94 (0.50–1.76) 0.839

For those polymorphisms with few homozygous variant alleles, only the combined results of the heterozygous and homozygous variant alleles are shown.

*Adjusted for age, gender, smoking and hypertension in multivariate unconditional logistic regression model. The P values < 0.05 are indicated in bold.

Discussion

In this study, we observed a significant association between the VDR ApaI variant and RCC risk in the Chinese Han population. Patients with AA and CA genotypes of the ApaI polymorphism were shown to have a 2.66- and 1.47-fold increased RCC risk, respectively, compared with those with the CC genotype. We also found that the ApaI polymorphism AA genotype was associated with a higher Fuhrman grade of RCC. However, none of the other four polymorphisms (TaqI, BsmI, Cdx-2, and FokI) were associated with the incidence of RCC. These results provide evidence for a potential role of inherited VDR variants in the development of RCC.

A few previous studies have comprehensively analyzed the genetic variation in VDR in relation to RCC. For example, a recent case–control study of 135 RCC patients and 150 controls in a Japanese population found that participants with the ApaI site AA genotype had a significant increase in RCC risk and a poor prognosis11. These data are consistent with those of our current report. However, because the ApaI SNP has only been analyzed in small studies typically limited to only one racial group, additional studies on larger population sizes are warranted to confirm these data. This SNP is located in intron 8 near the 3′ UTR of the VDR gene, and does not alter the amino acid sequence of the encoded protein; however, it may influence gene expression through the regulation of mRNA stability15. Recent genetic studies have shown that synonymous mutations may play an important role in disease etiology; they can affect protein expression and function by altering mRNA stability16,17.

FokI is the VDR SNP that has been most analyzed because of its functional significance. The FokI C allele encodes a VDR protein lacking three amino acids compared with that encoded by the T allele, which results in enhanced VDR transcription activity. In an earlier study conducted in Central and Eastern Europe, the prevalence of three common VDR SNPs (BsmI, FokI, and TaqI) did not differ according to tumor stage or grade12. These data are consistent with our own. In our study, RCC risk was not associated with the TaqI , BsmI and FokI polymorphisms. However, a recent study by Arjumand et al., which analyzed associations of VDR SNP genotypes with RCC progression in terms of AJCC stage and nuclear grade, reported that FokI and BsmI were significantly associated with increased RCC risk among the North Indian population13. These discrepancies may reflect the limited number of cases in some studies, or the analysis of different ethnic groups. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that allelic distribution varies among different ethnic groups, which may lead to controversial results among different populations18,19,20. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine Cdx-2 polymorphism and RCC risk. Cdx-2 leads to decreased transcriptional activity of the VDR promoter21. However, we found no association of Cdx-2 with RCC risk in our study.

Like other complex diseases, RCC appears to be caused by both genetic and environmental factors, such as cigarette smoking, obesity, and hypertension22,23. The sample size in our current study was relatively small, so it might not provide sufficient statistical power to assess the association between VDR SNPs and RCC risk. We didn’t perform further subgroup stratification analysis by smoking or obesity because of the insufficient of our data. Moreover, our study population was only of Han Chinese; thus, more comprehensive studies involving larger sample sizes of ethnically diverse populations are warranted to validate these findings.

In conclusion, this study indicates that the ApaI polymorphism of VDR is associated with RCC risk in the Chinese Han population. It also suggests that the ApaI polymorphism is a potential determinant of prognosis in terms of Fuhrman grade in RCC patients. Additional studies are needed to fully elucidate the role of VDR genetic variation in RCC risk.

Methods

Study population

A total of 302 RCC Chinese Han patients and 302 healthy controls were recruited between November 2009 and April 2012 at the First Hospital of China Medical University (Shenyang, China). All patients were recruited after a radiologic and histologic diagnosis of RCC. Detailed information about age, sex and clinical characteristics were obtained for all participants (see Table 1). The histologic subtype distribution was as follows: 241 clear cell RCC, 14 papillary RCC, 20 chromophobe RCC, 22 multilocular cystic RCC, and five unclassified RCC. Tumor stages and grades were determined according to the tumor–node–metastasis classification of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the Fuhrman scale. Controls were randomly selected from individuals undergoing a health examination at the First Hospital of China Medical University during the same time period. Controls were cancer-free and were age- and sex-matched to cases. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Hospital of China Medical University, and carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

DNA extraction and genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from 200 μL of whole blood samples using the QIAamp DNA Micro Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Extracted DNA was dissolved to a concentration of 30 ng/μL and was stored at −80 °C. High-resolution melting methods using the LightCycler® 480 system (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) were used for SNP genotyping according to a previously reported protocol14. Primer sequences used for amplification are listed in Table 4. For quality control purposes, 20% of cases and controls were verified by direct sequencing to confirm SNP genotypes, resulting in a concordance rate of 100%. We confirmed our genotyping results by direct sequencing using an ABI3730 sequencer (ABI, America).

Table 4. Polymerase chain reaction primers and amplicons.

SNP Alleles Primers for PCR amplification Amplicon (bp) Annealing Temperatures (°C)
TaqI (rs731236) T/C F: 5′-CCTGTGCCTTCTTCTCTAT 171 51.9
R: 5′-CTAGCTTCTGGATCATCTTG 52.6
BsmI (rs1544410) G/A F: 5′- ATATAGGCAGAACCATCTCT 166 50.5
R: 5′-TCTGAGGAACTAGATAAGCA 50.2
Cdx-2 (rs11568820) A/G F: 5′-AGGGAGGAAGGAAGGAAA 193 56.2
R: 5′-CTGTAGCAATGAAAGCAAAC 53.7
ApaI (rs7975232) C/A F: 5′-GAGAAGAAGGCACAGGAG 118 53.2
R: 5′-CGGTCAGCAGTCATAGAG 52.4
FokI (rs2228570) C/T F: 5′-CACTGACTCTGGCTCTGA 173 52.8
R: 5′-CTTCACAGGTCATAGCATTG 54.2

Statistical analysis

A goodness-of-fit chi-squared (χ2) test was used to evaluate the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) of the gene frequencies of the healthy individuals. Differences in frequency distributions of epidemiological factors between RCC cases and controls were tested using the Student’s t-test for continuous variables and the χ2-test for categorical variables. To avoid spurious associations due to a small number of homozygous individuals, we used the dominant model for TaqI and BsmI to evaluate associations between the genotypes and RCC risk. The associations between VDR polymorphisms and RCC risk were estimated by calculating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). from unconditional logistic regression analysis, adjusting for age and sex. The ORs and 95%CI were calculated by multivariate logistic regression analyses, adjusted for the effect of covariates like sex, age, smoking and hypertension status. All statistical tests were two-tailed with P-value < 0.05 considered as statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS statistical package, version 19.0. (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Yang, C. et al. The vitamin D receptor gene ApaI polymorphism is associated with increased risk of renal cell carcinoma in Chinese population. Sci. Rep. 6, 25987; doi: 10.1038/srep25987 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep25987-s1.doc (82.5KB, doc)

Footnotes

Author Contributions C.M.Y., Y.H.J. and F.D.M. participated in the study design and data interpretation. J.L. and Y.L. participated in the sample collection. D.W. and C.G.S. performed the DNA extraction and genotyping. C.M.Y. and F.D.M. participated in the data analysis process and manuscript drafting. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. Ferlay J. et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 127, 2893–917 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Porta C., Bellmunt J., Eisen T., Szczylik C. & Mulders P. Treating the individual: The need for a patient-focused approach to the management of renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev. 36, 16–23 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Siegel R., Ma J., Zou Z. & Jemal A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 64, 9–29 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ljungberg B. et al. The epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 60, 615–21 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rukin N. & Strange R. C.: What are the frequency, distribution, and functional effects of vitamin D receptor polymorphisms as related to cancer risk? Nutr Rev. 65, S96–S101 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Buentig N. et al. Predictive impact of retinoid X receptor-alpha-expression in renal-cell carcinoma. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 19, 331–42 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ntais C., Polycarpou A. & Ioannidis J. Vitamin d receptor gene polymorph isms and risk of prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 12, 1395 (2003). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Köstner K. et al. The relevance of vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms for cancer: a review of the literature. Anticancer Res. 29, 3511–3536 (2009). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Uitterlinden A., Fang Y., Van Meurs J., Pols H. & Van Leeuwen J. Genetics and biology of vitamin D receptor polymorphisms. Gene. 338, 143–56 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Raimondi S., Johansson H., Maisonneuve P. & andini S. Review and meta-analysis on vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and cancer risk. Carcinogenesis. 30, 1170–1180 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Obara W. et al. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms are associated with increased risk and progression of renal cell carcinoma in a Japanese population. Int J Urol. 14, 483–7 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Karami S. et al. Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and renal cancer risk in Central and Eastern Europe. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 71, 367–72 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Arjumand W., Ahmad S. T., Seth A., Saini A. K. & Sultana S. Vitamin D receptor FokI and BsmI gene polymorphism and its association with grade and stage of renal cell carcinoma in North Indian population. Tumour Biol. 33, 23–31 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jin G., Kang H., Chen X. & Dai D. Evaluation of the relationship between IL28B, IL10RB and IL28RA single-nucleotide polymorphisms and susceptibility to hepatitis C virus in Chinese Han population. Infect Genet Evol. 21, 8–14 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jurutka P. W. et al. Molecular nature of the vitamin D receptor and its role in regulation of gene expression. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2, 203–16 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Capon F. et al. A synonymous SNP of the corneodesmosin gene leads to increased mRNA stability and demonstrates association with psoriasis across diverse ethnic groups. Hum Mol Genet. 13, 2361–8 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nackley A. G. et al. Human catechol-O-methyltransferase haplotypes modulate protein expression by altering mRNA secondary structure. Science. 314, 1930–3 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ntais C., Polycarpou A. & Ioannidis J. P. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 12, 1395–402 (2003). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kibel A. S., Isaacs S. D., Isaacs W. B. & Bova G. S. Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and lethal prostate cancer. J Urol. 160, 1405–9 (1998). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Watanabe M. et al. Significance of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism for prostate cancer risk in Japanese. Anticancer Res. 19, 4511–4 (1999). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Abbas S. et al. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and haplotypes and postmenopausal breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res. 10, R31 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Motzer R. J., Bander N. H. & Nanus D. M. Renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 335, 865–75 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Godley P. A. & Stinchcombe T. E. Renal cell carcinoma. Curr Opin Oncol. 11, 213–7 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep25987-s1.doc (82.5KB, doc)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES