Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Res. 2016 Mar 11;147:461–468. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.02.029

Maternal body burden of cadmium and offspring size at birth

Megan E Romano 1,*, Daniel A Enquobahrie 2,3, Christopher Simpson 4, Harvey Checkoway 5, Michelle A Williams 3,6
PMCID: PMC4866807  NIHMSID: NIHMS767967  PMID: 26970900

Abstract

Increasing evidence suggests an inverse association between cadmium (Cd) and size at birth, potentially greatest among female neonates. We evaluated whether greater maternal body burden of Cd is associated with reduced neonatal anthropometry (birthweight, birth length, head circumference, and ponderal index) and assessed whether these associations differ by infant sex. The analytic sample for the present study (n=396) was derived from a subcohort of 750 women randomly drawn from among all participants (N=4,344) in the Omega Study, a prospective pregnancy cohort. Creatinine-corrected Cd in maternal clean-catch spot urine samples (U-Cd) was quantified by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Continuous log2-transformed Cd (log2-Cd) and U-Cd tertiles (low <0.29 µg/g creatinine, middle 0.29–0.42 µg/g creatinine, high ≥0.43 µg/g creatinine) were used in multivariable linear regression models. Females had reduced birth length with greater U-Cd tertile, whereas males birth length marginally increased [β(95% CI) females: low=reference, middle= −0.59 cm (−1.37, 0.19), high=–0.83 cm (−1.69, 0.02), p-trend=0.08; males: low=reference, middle=0.18 cm (−0.59, 0.95), high=0.78 cm (−0.04, 1.60), p-trend=0.07; p for interaction=0.03]. The log2-Cd by infant sex interaction was statistically significant for ponderal index [p=0.003; β(95% CI): female=0.25 kg/m3 (−0.20, 0.70); male= −0.63 kg/m3 (−1.01, −0.24)] and birth length [p<0.001; β(95% CI): female= −0.47 cm (−0.74, −0.20), male= 0.32 cm (0.00, 0.65)]. Our findings suggest potential sex-specific reversal of Cd’s associations on birth length and contribute to the evidence suggesting Cd impairs fetal growth.

INTRODUCTION

Cadmium (Cd) is widely used in the production of batteries, pigments, plastics, and other commercial products. Cd has long been recognized as an occupational health hazard, but less is known about the adverse effects of environmental Cd exposure among the general population, particularly in early life (ATSDR et al., 2012). Ingestion of food containing Cd and inhalation of tobacco smoke are the primary routes of Cd exposure in the general population (Satarug and Moore, 2004). Cd exposure leads to renal damage (Kido et al., 2004), cardiovascular disease (Tellez-Plaza et al., 2013), and osteoporosis (Alfvén T, 2000). Calcium, zinc, and iron deficiencies, as well as diets low in protein can augment Cd absorption (Kippler et al., 2007; Kippler et al., 2009). Lower iron stores in reproductive age women (Järup and Akesson, 2009) and substantial pregnancy-related increases in iron requirements (Bothwell, 2000) may increase Cd absorption during pregnancy (Akesson et al., 2002; Kippler et al., 2009). Following ingestion or inhalation, Cd is absorbed and not readily excreted (Satarug and Moore, 2004). Though Cd is primarily stored in the liver and kidneys the placenta also accumulates Cd (Kido et al., 2004; Satarug and Moore, 2004). This may contribute to decreased uteroplacental blood flow (Chertok et al., 1984) or disrupt the synthesis and metabolism of placental hormones, leading to fetal growth restriction (Stasenko et al., 2010).

Several previous studies have observed inverse associations between gestational exposure to Cd (characterized using measures in cord blood, placenta, maternal blood, or urine) and birthweight (Al-Saleh et al., 2014; Fréry et al., 1993; Galicia-García et al., 1997; Johnston et al., 2014; Kippler et al. 2012a; Llanos and Ronco, 2009; Nishijo et al., 2002; Salpietro et al., 2002; Shirai et al., 2010; Sun et al., 2014; Tian et al., 2009; Xu et al., 2015), birth length (Nishijo et al., 2004; Tian et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2004), and head circumference (Kippler et al. 2012a; Nishijo et al., 2004), although others have observed no associations, (Klapec et al., 2008; Odland et al., 2004; Osman et al., 2000), inverted U-shaped (Kippler et al., 2012b), or positive associations(Bloom et al., 2015).

The largest studies to date each included more than 1,000 maternal-infant pairs and observed inverse associations between Cd and birthweight (Al-Saleh et al., 2014; Johnston et al., 2014; Kippler et al. 2012a), but many prior studies included fewer than 80 maternal-infant pairs (Galicia-García et al., 1997; Kippler et al., 2010; Llanos and Ronco, 2009; Nishijo et al., 2002; Nishijo et al., 2004; Salpietro et al., 2002; Shirai et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2004). Kippler et al. observed decreasing birthweight with increasing maternal urinary Cd among female neonates only (Kippler et al. 2012a). Effect modification by infant sex has not been well investigated, and control for confounding has been inconsistent. In particular, co-exposure to arsenic, which has been suggested to reduce birthweight (Rahman et al., 2009; Xu et al., 2011), should be accounted for in geographic areas where Cd and arsenic commonly co-occur, such as Bangledesh (Kippler et al. 2012a) or areas of the United States with historic copper smelting activities (e.g. Puget Sound) (King County Environmental Health Services, 2010).

The goal of the present study was to evaluate whether greater maternal body burden of Cd impairs fetal growth as measured by infant anthropometry (birthweight, birth length, head circumference, and ponderal index), and to evaluate whether these associations differ for male versus female neonates. We hypothesized that maternal urinary cadmium is inversely associated with birth anthropometrics and that these associations are potentially more pronounced among female neonates.

METHODS

Study Setting and Study Population

The Omega Study, a large prospective cohort study at the Center for Perinatal Studies at Swedish Medical Center in Seattle, WA, was designed to investigate risk factors for pregnancy complications (Qiu et al., 2011). Subjects were recruited from multiple prenatal care clinics affiliated with Swedish Medical Center and Tacoma General Hospital (1996–2008). English speaking women initiating prenatal care at a study clinic prior to 20 weeks gestation were eligible for participation. Women who were less than 18 years of age, planning to deliver at a non-study hospital, or not intending to carry the pregnancy to term were excluded. The analytic sample for the present study was derived from a subcohort of 750 women randomly drawn from among all participants (N=4,344) in the Omega Study. All procedures and study protocols were approved by the institutional review boards at the University of Washington and the study hospitals, and all participants provided written informed consent.

Women with a history of renal disease (n=7), pre-existing diabetes mellitus (n=17), chronic hypertension (n=33), multiple fetal births (n=27), and known complications of pregnancy [preeclampsia (n=27), gestational diabetes (n=44), preterm delivery, miscarriage, or stillbirth (n=115), infant with congenital anomaly (n=22)], and women that did not provide a urine sample during pregnancy (n=18) were excluded from analyses. World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines suggest that creatinine concentration may be used to identify spot urine samples that are too dilute (<30 mg/dL) or too concentrated (>300 mg/dL) to provide valid estimates of the concentration of the urinary chemical of interest (WHO, 1996). We excluded 125 women who had overly dilute urine. Aside from their low urinary creatinine level, the characteristics of these women were similar to those remaining in the study (data not shown). The exclusions described above are not mutually exclusive; some women were excluded for multiple reasons. The final analytic population included 396 maternal-infant pairs. Women in the analytic population were similar to women in the full Omega Cohort in terms of demographics and other key covariates (data not shown).

Data Collection

Information on sociodemographic characteristics, reproductive and medical histories, lifestyle factors such as alcohol and tobacco use, and maternal anthropometry was collected by trained interviewers using a structured questionnaire shortly after study enrollment (15 weeks gestation, on average). Maternal medical records were abstracted to ascertain pregnancy outcomes, covariate data related to pregnancy complications and relevant characteristics during pregnancy. Participants also completed a self-administered, validated, and semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ) describing nutritional intake over the prior six months (Patterson et al., 1999) (three months before pregnancy through the first three months of pregnancy, on average).

Cadmium and Arsenic Assessment

At 15 weeks gestation, on average (standard deviation=2.8, interquartile range=13–17 gestational weeks), clean-catch spot urine samples were collected in polyethylene containers, promptly separated into 2 mL aliquots, and stored at −80 °C until analysis. Urine concentrations of Cd and total arsenic were quantified using a validated method of inductively coupled plasma mass-spectrometry (ICP-MS) following published protocols (Heitland, 2004) at Metametrix Clinical Laboratory, a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) certified facility in Duluth, GA. Briefly, urine samples were shaken and 1 mL was acidified with 1% HNO3 (100 µl). An internal standard solution containing scandium, rhodium, and germanium (500 µl) was added. Samples were diluted to 5 mL with deionized water. Polyatomic interference was minimized through the use of ICP-MS with a dynamic reaction cell (PerkinElmer SCIEX Elan DRC II with ESI SC-4, FAST Autosampler). The accuracy of ICP-MS was checked by conducting proficiency testing using urine reference material (New York Toxic / Trace Elements in Urine Event #1 2012). The limits of detection for urinary Cd and total arsenic were 0.12 and 3.0 µg/g creatinine respectively, and the coefficients of variation (CV’s) were less than 10–15%. (Urinary creatinine concentration was assessed using a commercially available kit (Genzyme Diagnostics, Catalog # 221-30/# 221-50) with improved Jaffe Reaction.

The distribution of creatinine-corrected, urinary Cd concentration (U-Cd) was right- skewed. We used a log2-transformation (log2-Cd) to diminish the influence of extreme values on the regression coefficients. The majority of the women in the analytic population (84%) had U- Cd greater than the limit of detection (LOD=0.12 µg/g creatinine). Appropriate to our observed distribution of Cd, we substituted LOD/(√2) for women with U-Cd values below the LOD (Croghan and Egeghy, 2003; Glass and Gray, 2001). Maternal U-Cd was also categorized into low (<0.29 µg/g creatinine), middle (0.29–0.42 µg/g creatinine), and high (≥0.43 µg/g creatinine) tertiles.

Infant anthropometry- Information on infant birthweight (g), birth length (cm), and head circumference (cm) was abstracted from infant medical records. Ponderal index, a measure of leanness in newborns used to quantify asymmetric fetal growth restriction, was calculated as: [birthweight (kg)]/ [birth length (m)]3 (Landmann et al., 2006).

Statistical Analysis

We examined the frequency distribution of maternal sociodemographic characteristics, medical and reproductive histories according to tertile of U-Cd and infant sex. Multivariable linear regression was used to model the relation between continuous log2-Cd or tertile of maternal U-Cd and each continuous outcome [birthweight (g), ponderal index (kg/m3), birth length (cm), and head circumference (cm)]. The models adjusted for the following confounders based on a priori knowledge of their associations with exposure and outcome (Al-Saleh et al., 2014; Järup and Akesson, 2009; Kippler et al., 2013; Kippler et al., 2009; Satarug and Moore, 2004; Shirai et al., 2010): continuous maternal age (years), parity (nulliparous/multiparous), continuous maternal pre- pregnancy BMI, maternal race (non-Hispanic white: yes/no), gestational age (continuous weeks plus quadratic term). However, we did not adjust for gestational age in the ponderal index analysis, as ponderal index remains fairly steady at term (Landmann et al., 2006) and was confirmed to be steady at term in this cohort (data not shown). For the birth length analysis, maternal height (m) was substituted for maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, as it tends to be strongly associated with birth length (Bisai, 2010; Shirai et al., 2010). Additional potential confounders were assessed as described below. Environmental exposure to inorganic arsenic can decrease birthweight (Hopenhayn et al., 2003; Llanos and Ronco, 2009; Rahman et al., 2009; Xu et al., 2011), but inorganic arsenic appears not to be associated with birth length and head circumference (Rahman et al., 2009; Shirai et al., 2010). We conducted an exploratory analysis to assess the impact of confounding by arsenic exposure on the Cd-birthweight and Cd-ponderal index associations. Total arsenic in urine reflects both organic and inorganic species of arsenic. Ideally, we would quantify speciated arsenic, because the toxicologically relevant form is unclear, and recent ingestion of seafood increases the level of organo-arsenic species in urine (Orloff et al., 2009). In order to partially account for expected higher levels of organic arsenic species in the urine of women that regularly consume seafood, we further adjusted for self-reported fish consumption habits (servings of fish and seafood per week derived from food frequency questionnaire; n=370, mean±sd: 1.4 ±1.3) in models containing creatinine corrected total urinary arsenic (U-As). Because only 6.3% of participants in the full Omega Study cohort are current smokers, we did not a priori adjust for smoking status in the main analyses. However, we tested the effect of smoking during pregnancy (yes/no) and included it in the final birthweight and ponderal index models. We also conducted a sensitivity analysis restricted to never smokers. We assessed the impact of nutritional factors including, weight gain during pregnancy, calcium, iron, and zinc intake on the effect estimates. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines were used to classify total weight gain during pregnancy based on pre-pregnancy BMI as below optimal, optimal, or above optimal (IOM et al., 2009). Daily caloric intake (kcal/day) and dietary intake of calcium, iron, and zinc (mg/day) were estimated using food composition tables from the University of Minnesota Nutrition Coding Center Nutrient Database (Nutrition Coordinating Center, Minneapolis, MN) (Schakel, 2004) and the FFQ. Low dietary intake of micronutrients was designated based on the IOM recommended dietary allowance (RDA) for calcium, iron, and zinc during pregnancy (IOM Panel on Micronutrients, 2001). We calculated birthweight z-scores, a measure of birthweight for gestational age standardized to United States reference data (Oken et al., 2003), and repeated the analysis with birthweight z-score as an outcome.

An interaction term was added to each of the final models to formally assess the joint effect of U-Cd (either log2-Cd or tertile) and infant sex on outcomes of interest. We conducted trend tests using the median values of the distribution within tertiles of maternal urinary exposure as the score variable (Greenland, 1995).

As there are no specific recommendations for creatinine-based exclusions among pregnant women, we performed a sensitivity analysis in which we relaxed the urinary creatinine exclusion criteria. Data from NHANES suggest that for women the cutoff of <30 mg creatinine/dL urine may be inappropriate, because it is common for women to have low urinary creatinine (Barr et al., 2005). In our sensitivity analysis, we excluded women with urine samples that were too concentrated (>300 mg/dL) according to both the guidelines of the WHO and the NHANES based recommendations, but included all women with dilute urine (creatinine <30 mg/dL)(Barr et al., 2005; WHO, 1996). We also repeated analyses with creatinine added to the model as a covariate rather than using creatinine-standardized U-Cd.

All multivariable linear regressions used robust standard error estimates (Huber, 1967; White, 1980) and the alpha level of 0.05 to define statistical significance. All analyses were completed using Stata 13 (StataCorp 2013) or SAS 9.4 statistical software (SAS Institute Inc. 2012).

RESULTS

Women in the study population were predominately married, Non-Hispanic white, nulliparous, and had education beyond high school (Table 1). The geometric mean of U- Cd was not different for women who delivered female (0.31 µg/g creatinine; 95% CI 0.28, 0.34 µg/g creatinine) versus male infants (0.31 µg/g creatinine; 95% CI 0.28, 0.34 µg/g creatinine). Average birth anthropometrics were not significantly different across tertiles of maternal U-Cd among women who delivered male or female infants (Table 1). Regardless of infant sex, women in the low tertile for U-Cd tended to be younger (Females: mean=31.7, Males: mean=32.3 years) than women in the higher two tertiles (Table 1). Among women who delivered female infants only, those in the highest tertile of U-Cd had lower average maternal pre-pregnancy BMI (mean=21.8 kg/m2) and a smaller proportion of nulliparous women (49.2%) than the lower two tertiles (Table 1). Maternal total U-As and U-Cd were weakly but significantly correlated in our population (Spearman's rho =0.19; p<0.01), and total urinary arsenic was retained in the multivariable models for birthweight and ponderal index.

Table 1.

Maternal and infant characteristics of the study population by tertile of maternal urinary cadmium and infant sex

Female Neonates
Tertiles of Maternal Urinary
Cadmium
(µg/g creatinine)
Male Neonates
Tertiles of Maternal Urinary
Cadmium
(µg/g creatinine)
<0.29 0.29–
0.42
≥0.43 <0.29 0.29–0.42 ≥0.43
n=68 n=62 n=63 n=67 n=72 n=64
Mean±SD
Infant anthropometrics
    Birthweight (g) (n=396) 3475
±452
3522
±403
3392
±470
3642
±459
3570
±472
3682
±366
    Birth length (cm) (n=390) 51.2
±2.6
50.8
±2.2
50.5 ±2.4 51.6 ±2.6 51.8 ±2.2 52.3
±2.3
    Head circumference (cm)
(n=387)
34.6
±1.7
34.7
±1.7
34.3 ±1.6 35.1 ±1.7 35.2 ±1.6 35.3
±1.7
    Ponderal index (kg/m3)
(n=390)
25.9
±3.5
26.9
±3.5
26.6 ±4.3 26.5 ±3.0 25.8 ±3.6 25.9
±3.0
Maternal age years 31.7
±4.7
33.4
±4.2
34.5 ±4.7 * 32.3 ±4.4 32.8 ±3.8 33.6
±4.1
Pre-pregnancy BMI (kg/m2)a 24.5
±5.1
23.2
±3.6
21.8 ±3.1 * 23.9 ±6.9 23.4 ±3.9 23.4
±4.0
Gestational week of urine
collection
15.3
±2.8
15.4
±2.7
15.1 ±2.9 15.4 ±2.9 15.2 ±3.0 15.1
±2.7
n(%)
Maternal race/ethnicity
    Non- Hispanic white 59
(86.8)
57 (91.9) 52 (82.5) 58 (86.6) 56 (77.8) 51
(79.7)
    Other 9(13.2) 5 (8.1) 11 (17.5) 9 (13.5) 16 (22.2) 13
(20.3)
Maternal education
    Post high school 65
(95.6)
59 (95.2) 54(85.7) 59 (88.1) 65 (90.3) 60
(93.8)
    High school or less 1 (1.5) 1 (1.6) 3 (4.8) 3 (4.5) 3 (4.2) 2 (3.1)
    Missing (n=19)
Marital Status
    Married 58
(85.3)
56 (90.3) 51 (81.0) 56 (83.6) 63 (87.5) 60
(93.8)
    Unmarried 10
(14.7)
6 (9.7) 12 (19.1) 11 (16.4) 9 (12.5) 4 (6.3)
Parity *
    Nulliparous 49 (72.1) 37
(59.7)
31
(49.2)
37
(55.2)
38 (52.8) 38 (59.3)
    Parous 19 (27.9) 24
(40.3)
32
(50.8)
30
(44.8)
34 (47.2) 26 (40.6)
Family history of diabetes b *
    Yes 6 (8.8) 10 (16.1) 14
(22.2)
6 (9.0) 14 (19.4) 7 (10.9)
    No 62 (91.2) 52 (83.9) 49
(77.8)
61
(91.0)
58 (80.6) 57 (89.1)
Family history of
hypertension c
    Yes 30 (44.1) 23
(37.1)
23 (36.5) 31 (46.3) 37 (51.4) 24
(37.5)
    No 38 (55.9) 39
(62.9)
40 (63.5) 36 (53.7) 35 (48.6) 40
(62.5)
Smoking status d
    Never 50 (73.5) 41 (66.1) 40 (63.5) 42 (62.7) 50 (69.4) 45
(70.3)
    Former 12 (17.7) 15 (24.2) 14 (22.2) 13 (19.4) 12 (16.7) 11
(17.2)
    Current 4 (5.9) 4 (6.5) 3 (4.7) 7 (7.5) 4 (5.6) 3 (4.7)
    Missing (n=20)
Alcohol during pregnancye
    Consumed none 49 (72.1) 44 (71.0) 39 (61.9) 49 (73.1) 44 (61.1) 48
(75.0)
    Consumed any 19 (27.9) 18 (29.0) 24 (38.1) 18 (26.9) 28 (38.9) 16
(25.0)
IOM weight gain
guidelines f
    Below optimal 9 (13.2) 8 (12.9) 6 (9.5) 2 (3.0) 3 (4.2) 4 (6.3)
    Optimal 21 (30.9) 22 (35.5) 27 (42.9) 24 (35.8) 20 (27.8) 17
(26.6)
    Above optimal 38 (55.9) 32
(51.6)
28
(44.4)
41 (61.2) 48 (66.7) 42
(65.6)
    Missing (n=4)
Infant delivered by C-
section
*
    Yes 21 (30.9) 13 (21.0) 10 (15.9) 14 (21.0) 24 (33.3) 23
(35.9)
    No 47 (69.1) 49 (79.0) 53 (84.1) 53 (19.1) 48 (66.7) 41
(64.1)
GM (95% CI)
    Dietary micronutrient
intake g
    Calcium (g) 1.1
(1.0, 1.3)
1.1
(1.0,
1.3)
0.9
(0.7, 1.1)
1.1
(0.9, 1.2)
1.0
(0.9, 1.2)
1.1
(0.9,
1.2)
    Total iron (mg) 14 (12,
15)
13 (11,
14)
12 (10,
15)
12 (10,
14)
12 (11, 14) 12 (11,
14)
    Zinc (mg) 12 (10,
14)
12
(10,13)
10 (8, 13) 11
(10,12)
11 (10, 12) 11 (9,
12)
    Missing (n=35)
    Maternal Urinary Measures
    Cadmium µg/g
creatinine
0.14
(0.12,
0.16)
0.35
(0.34,
0.36)
0.64
(0.58,
0.71)
0.14
(0.12,
0.16)
0.35
(0.34,
0.36)
0.60
(0.56,
0.66)
    Total Arsenic µg/g
creatinine
17 (12,
22)
19 (15,
24)
26 (20,
34)*
19 (15,
23)
18 (15,
23)
21 (18,
26)
    Creatinine mg/dL 81 (69,
94)
87 (78,
97)
78 (67,
91)
79 (69,
92)
91 (80,
103)
78 (68,
88)

CI=confidence interval, GM=Geometric Mean, SD=standard deviation

*

p-trend<0.05 for regression analysis of continuous covariates or p<0.05 for analysis of variance of log2-transformed cadmium by categorical covariates

a.

Body mass index (BMI)

b.

Any maternal primary or secondary relative with a diabetic condition

c.

Any maternal primary or secondary relative with hypertension

d.

Maternal self-reported smoking of tobacco cigarettes during the study pregnancy

e.

Maternal self-reported alcohol consumption during the study pregnancy

f.

Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines for weight gain during pregnancy (Institute of Medicine 2009)

g.

Low intake designated by consuming less than the IOM daily recommended dietary allowance for pregnant women: calcium (1 g), iron (27 mg), zinc (11 mg)(Institute of Medicine Panel on Micronutrients 2001)

Among all infants, we observed small and statistically insignificant decreases in birthweight, ponderal index, and birth length with increasing maternal U-Cd (both continuous log2-Cd and tertiles of U-Cd) (Table 2). For each doubling of maternal U-Cd we observed a 0.63 kg/m3decrease in ponderal index among male infants (95% CI −1.01 kg/m3, −0.24 kg/m3), but not among female infants (0.25 kg/m3; 95% CI: −0.20 kg/m3, 0.70 kg/m3; p-for-effect modification=0.003). However, no clear trend in ponderal index was observed across tertiles of maternal U-Cd among either female (p-trend=0.96) or male infants (p-trend=0.15). For each doubling of maternal U-Cd we observed a 0.47 cm decrease in birth length among female infants (95% CI −1.01 cm, −0.24 cm) and a 0.32 cm increase in birth length among male infants (95% CI: 0.00 cm, 0.65 cm; p-for-effect modification <0.001). Among female neonates, we observed reduced birth length with increasing tertile of maternal U-Cd [β(95% CI): low=reference; middle= −0.59 cm (−1.37, 0.19 cm); high=–0.83 (−1.69, 0.02 cm); p-trend=0.08]. An increase in birth length across increasing tertiles of maternal U-Cd was observed among male neonates [β(95% CI): low=reference; middle=0.18 cm (−0.59, 0.95 cm); high=0.78 cm (–0.04, 1.60 cm); p-trend=0.07]. The interaction between tertile of maternal urinary Cd and sex of neonate for the birth length analysis was statistically significant (p=0.03) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Multivariable linear regression analyses of the association between maternal urinary cadmium and newborn anthropometrics

Urinary Cadmium
(µg/g creatinine)
n All Infants
β (95% CI)
n Female infants a
β (95% CI)
n Male infants a
β (95%CI)
p-value
Birthweight (g) b

    Continuous log2-Cd 349 −29(−70, 12) 169 −50(−109, 8) 180 −7(−65, 51) 0.311c
    Low (<0.29) 125 0 (reference) 64 0 (reference) 61 0 (reference)
    Medium (0.29–0.42) 119 −29(−130, 73) 56 −10(−153, 133) 63 −46(−191, 99)
    High (≥0.43) 105 −12(−120, 95) 49 −61(−228, 106) 56 28(−112, 167)
    p-trend d 0.809 0.328 0.603 0.538 e

Ponderal Index (kg/m3)f

    Continuous log2-Cd 343 −0.18(−0.49, 0.13) 164 0.25(−0.20, 0.70) 179 −0.63(−1.01, −0.24) 0.003c
    Low (<0.29) 121 0 (reference) 61 0 (reference) 60 0 (reference)
    Medium (0.29–0.42) 118 −0.05(−0.93, 0.83) 55 0.79(0.23, −0.50) 63 −0.84(−2.03, 0.35)
    High (≥0.43) 104 −0.27(−1.18, 0.64) 48 0.36(−1.00, 1.71) 56 −0.87(−2.02, 0.28)
    p-trend d 0.559 0.964 0.154 0.157e

Birth Length (cm) g

    Continuous log2-Cd 390 −0.08(−0.30, 0.14) 188 −0.47(−0.74, −0.20) 202 0.32(0.00, 0.65) <0.001c
    Low (<0.29) 131 0 (reference) 65 0 (reference) 66 0 (reference)
    Medium (0.29–0.42) 133 −0.20(−0.75, 0.35) 61 −0.59(−1.37, 0.19) 72 0.18(−0.59, 0.95)
    High (≥0.43) 126 −0.01(−0.61, 0.59) 62 −0.83(−1.69, 0.02) 64 0.78(−0.04, 1.60)
    p-trend d 0.986 0.084 0.069 0.029e

Head Circumference (cm)h

    (Continuous log2-Cd 387 −0.04(−0.21, 0.12) 185 −0.17(−0.39, 0.06) 202 0.07(−0.17, 0.31) 0.160c
    Low (<0.29) 127 0 (reference) 61 0 (reference) 66 0 (reference)
    Medium (0.29–0.42) 134 0.09(−0.29, 0.47) 62 0.10(−0.45, 0.65) 72 0.08(−0.46, 0.62)
    High (≥0.43) 126 0.12(−0.27, 0.50) 62 −0.04(−0.61, 0.52) 64 0.26(−0.30, 0.82)
     p-trend d 0.562 0.995 0.366 0.668 e
a.

Multivariable linear regression models included a product interaction term for maternal urinary cadmium by infant sex

b.

Controlling for maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, race/ethnicity, nulliparity, gestational age at delivery, smoking during pregnancy, infant sex, gestational week of urine sample collection, and maternal total urinary arsenic adjusted for fish consumption

c.

p-value for log2-Cd*sex interaction

d.

p-value for trend across tertiles of maternal urinary cadmium

e.

p-value for Cd tertile*sex interaction

f.

Controlling for maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, race/ethnicity, nulliparity, smoking during pregnancy, infant sex, gestational week of urine sample collection, and maternal total urinary arsenic adjusted for fish consumption

g.

Controlling for maternal age, maternal height, race/ethnicity, nulliparity, gestational age at delivery, infant sex, and gestational week of urine sample collection

h.

Controlling for maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, race/ethnicity, nulliparity, gestational age at delivery, delivery by Caesarean section, infant sex, and gestational week of urine sample collection

The overall pattern of observed associations between maternal U-Cd and fetal growth markers were generally the same for the sensitivity analyses including women with dilute urine (<30 mg creatinine/dL) (Supplemental Table S1) or including creatinine as a covariate in the model (Supplemental Table S2), although a decreasing trend in ponderal index across U-Cd tertiles was observed among male infants in both scenarios (Supplemental Table S1 p-trend=0.05 and Supplemental Table S2 p-trend=0.03). The pattern of effect estimates between maternal U-Cd and birth anthropometrics were similar when restricted to never smokers (Supplemental Table S3). The addition of nutritional factors to the birthweight, ponderal index and head circumference models did not substantially change the observed estimates. Upon adding control for maternal weight gain during pregnancy and dietary calcium intake to the birth length models, the inverse trend across tertiles of maternal U-Cd and birth length was attenuated among the female infants [β(95% CI): low=reference; middle=–0.55 cm (−1.51, 0.41 cm); high=–0.38 cm (−1.42, 0.65 cm); p- trend=0.64] (Supplemental Table S4). The pattern of results for birthweight z-scores was similar overall to the results for the birthweight analysis (Supplemental Table S5).

DISCUSSION

In the current study, we observed that maternal U-Cd is associated with sex-specific differences in birth length and ponderal index. Maternal U-Cd was inversely associated with birth length among females and positively associated with birth length among males. Maternal U-Cd was inversely associated with ponderal index among males only; however, it is likely that the observed effect modification by infant sex of the relation of U-Cd with birth length is influencing the observed relations between maternal U-Cd and ponderal index. In addition, we observed modest, statistically insignificant, decreases in birthweight, ponderal index, and birth length among all neonates with increasing maternal U-Cd. The modest decreases in birth anthropometrics with increasing maternal U-Cd observed in our study are unlikely to be of clinical significance at the individual level. However, even incremental decreases in average size at birth may have adverse implications for infant mortality at the population level (Wilcox, 2001).

Our findings are broadly in line with prior research of Cd and birthweight. We observed a statistically insignificant decrease in birthweight corresponding to greater maternal log2-Cd among all neonates, in general agreement with prior studies which observed inverse associations between maternal U-Cd (Kippler et al. 2012a; Shirai et al., 2010) or other measures of maternal Cd and weight at birth (Al-Saleh et al., 2014; Fréry et al., 1993; Galicia-García et al., 1997; Johnston et al., 2014; Llanos and Ronco, 2009; Nishijo et al., 2002; Salpietro et al., 2002; Sun et al., 2014; Tian et al., 2009; Xu et al., 2015). Levels of urinary Cd were slightly greater on average in our study (geometric mean=0.31 µg/g creatinine 95% CI: 0.28, 0.34) than those of women in the general US population as estimated by the National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey (geometric mean=0.25 µg/g Cr; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.27)(CDC, 2013). However, U-Cd was lower on average in our US based population compared to those in Bangladesh (median=0.63 µg/L)(Kippler et al. 2012a) and Japan (geometric mean= 0.77 µg/g creatinine) (Shirai et al., 2010), potentially suggesting that Cd’s effect on birthweight may be of greater concern for populations with higher average Cd exposure than the general population of the US. Additionally, only a few previous studies have accounted for arsenic co-exposure (Kippler et al. 2012a; Llanos and Ronco, 2009; Shirai et al., 2010) when assessing the relation between Cd and birthweight. Though arsenic may not be a relevant co-exposure in every geographic region, it was an important potential co-exposure for our study (King County Environmental Health Services, 2010).

Although we did not observe any statistically significant associations of Cd with continuous birthweight, our observation of more substantial decreases in birthweight among female infants are in general agreement with previous findings, as reductions in birthweight with increasing maternal U-Cd were more pronounced among female infants (Kippler et al. 2012a). Kippler et al. conducted a large prospective study in which sex-specific effects of Cd exposure on size at birth were suggested (Kippler et al. 2012a). Specifically, they observed a 45 g decrease in birthweight for each 1 µg/L increase in maternal urinary Cd among female neonates (95% confidence interval: −82.5, −7.3 g), and no clear impact of Cd on fetal growth impairment among males (Kippler et al. 2012a), which is similar in magnitude to the 50 g decrease we observed among female neonates with each doubling of maternal U-Cd (95% confidence interval:-109, 8 g).

We observed some evidence to support effect modification of the relation between maternal U-Cd and ponderal index by infant sex, with girls experiencing modest increases in ponderal index, whereas boys had decreased ponderal index with greater maternal U-Cd, though this may be due to the observed differences in Cd’s effect on birth length among male versus female infants. Only two studies have assessed maternal Cd during pregnancy and either newborn BMI or ponderal index. In a cross-sectional study (n=262) spanning 6 regions across the Russian and Norwegian arctic and subarctic regions, Odland et al. observed a statistically insignificant increase of 4.4 kg/m2 in neonatal BMI with each µg/g increase in placental Cd (95% CI: −3.95, 12.75 kg/m2)(Odland et al., 2004). Al-Saleh et al. conducted a large cross-sectional study (n=1,578) among Saudi Arabian women, in which they assessed lead, cadmium and mercury in cord blood, placenta, and maternal blood (Al-Saleh et al., 2014). They reported that there was no association between ponderal index less than the 10th percentile and Cd, but did not publish their estimates (Al-Saleh et al., 2014). Neither study assessed effect modification by infant sex.

For the Cd-birth length relation, we observed effect modification by sex, suggesting an inverse dose-response relation between maternal U-Cd and birth length among female neonates and a positive dose response association among male infants. Although small and not statistically significant, Kippler et al. previously observed an inverse relation between increasing maternal U- Cd (µg/L) and birth length among females (β= −0.14 cm; 95% CI: −0.36, 0.08 cm) and a direct relation among males (β=0.07 cm; 95% CI −0.18, 0.32 cm)(Kippler et al. 2012a). To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first study to identify potential sex-specific differences in ponderal index or birth length related to intrauterine Cd exposure.

We did not see evidence of an association between maternal U-Cd and head circumference. Findings from prior studies have been equivocal, with one study observing decreasing head circumference with increasing Cd (Nishijo et al., 2004), one observing increasing head circumference with increasing Cd (Nishijo et al., 2002), several suggesting no association (Al-Saleh et al., 2014; Johnston et al., 2014; Kippler et al., 2010; Osman et al., 2000; Shirai et al., 2010), another suggesting an inverse association between U-Cd and head circumference among female neonates only (Kippler et al. 2012a), and one observing an inverted U-shape between maternal Cd and biparietal diameter measured by fetal ultrasound (Kippler et al., 2012b).

Several biological mechanisms have been proposed to explain Cd-induced fetal growth impairment. Experimental evidence supports Cd’s placental toxicity and ability to inhibit transfer of nutrients to the fetal compartment through reduced uteroplacental blood flow (Chertok et al., 1984; Wier et al., 1990). Disruption of the synthesis, metabolism, or release of hormones by the placenta also occurs as Cd accumulates in placental tissue. Placental metabolism of glucocorticoids diminishes in the presence of Cd (Ronco et al., 2009), failing to shield the fetus from the growth-inhibiting properties of glucocorticoids. Likewise, Cd is associated with reductions in placental leptin synthesis (Stasenko et al., 2010), which has been linked to intrauterine growth restriction (Jaquet, 1998).

Given the observation of different relations between Cd and fetal growth among girls versus boys in the current study and prior literature (Kippler et al. 2012a), the previously described mechanisms incompletely define the effect of Cd on fetal growth. Likewise, part of the discrepancy in results across prior studies is potentially due to failure to account for sex-specific effects of Cd on fetal growth. Sex-specific Cd-birthweight associations may be accomplished by Cd-induced changes to epigenetic regulation of genes governing growth. In the presence of Cd-exposure, hypomethylation of DNA isolated from cord blood was observed predominantly among genes associated with organ development, morphology, and bone development among females versus global hypermethylation among males (Kippler et al., 2013). Additional studies have observed sex-specific effects of cadmium on methylation of growth associated genes in cord blood (Vidal et al., 2015) and placenta (Mohanty et al., 2015). The reason for the apparent reversal of the Cd-birth length association between sexes is not readily apparent, but may be explained somewhat by sex-specific differences in Cd induced bone damage. Experimental studies have suggested that the male skeleton is somewhat resistant to Cd induced bone damage, as evidenced by sex-specific differences in the impact of Cd exposure on bone mineral density, bone mineral content, and bone metabolism (Bhattacharyya, 2009; Brzóska and Moniuszko-Jakoniuk, 2005a; Brzóska and Moniuszko-Jakoniuk, 2005b). Epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that Cd diminishes bone mineral density and increases fractures and osteoporosis risk for both adult men and women; however, the effects tend to be more pronounced among women (Alfvén T, 2000; Engström et al., 2012). Although these findings do not explain the positive association observed between Cd and birth length among male infants in our study, they demonstrate that less Cd induced bone damage occurs among males than among females. Additional work in this area is necessary to clarify the observed associations.

Our study drew on several important strengths, including its prospective design and the availability of extensive information for a broad array of potential confounders within a well-characterized cohort. We were able to measure Cd and arsenic in maternal urine, using a robust, well validated, and sensitive method (ICP-MS) to quantify concentrations in maternal urine, and ours is the first study, to the best of our knowledge, to report sex-specific differences in ponderal index. There are also limitations that should be considered when interpreting our study results. Humans are exposed to complex mixtures of toxic substances every day, and as with all studies of environmental exposures there is an inherent difficulty in singling out the effect of Cd alone.

Although we were able to control for total arsenic, additional unmeasured or unknown co- exposures may contribute to the risk of impaired fetal growth. Likewise, we could not fully assess iron, zinc, and calcium status among the women in our population. Cd absorption increases in the presence of iron, zinc, and calcium deficiencies (Kippler et al., 2007; Kippler et al., 2009). While we were able to evaluate the associations of micronutrient intake to some degree, we could not fully account for interactions among toxic and nutrient metals. Due to the large number of comparisons made in our statistical analyses, some of the observed associations may be chance findings. External validity may be reduced since women in the Omega Study are generally Non-Hispanic white, married, and prosperous, reflective of the underlying population that utilizes Swedish Medical Center and Tacoma General Hospital. However, these women should represent a subpopulation within the general public with elevated exposure to Cd, as high income has been associated with increased body burden of Cd (McElroy et al., 2007).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides further evidence that associations between Cd and size at birth may be sex-specific. We observed divergent effects of Cd on birth length and ponderal index among boys and girls. Future research is warranted to replicate these findings in diverse populations and to further clarify the observed relations. This study reiterates the adverse impact of gestational exposure to Cd on fetal growth among female neonates and adds to the evidence suggesting that the male and female fetus may employ differing growth strategies in response to similar intrauterine insults.

Supplementary Material

Highlights.

  • Cadmium levels in the general population potentially adversely affect size at birth

  • Maternal urinary cadmium was inversely related to birth length among female infants

  • For male infants, maternal cadmium was positively associated with birth length

  • Maternal cadmium was also inversely related to ponderal index among male infants

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by awards R01HD-32562 and K01HL103174 from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Dr. Romano was supported by the Reproductive, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Training Program of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) (T32 HD052462).

The authors thank the staff of the Center for Perinatal Studies for their skillful technical assistance.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

REFERENCES

  1. Akesson A, et al. Cadmium exposure in pregnancy and lactation in relation to iron status. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:284–287. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.2.284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Saleh I, et al. Birth outcome measures and maternal exposure to heavy metals (lead, cadmium and mercury) in Saudi Arabian population. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2014;217:205–218. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2013.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alfvén TECG. Low-level cadmium exposure and osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15:1579–1586. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.8.1579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. ATSDR et al. Toxicological Profile for Cadmium. U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 2012 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barr DB, et al. Urinary creatinine concentrations in the U.S. population: implications for urinary biologic monitoring measurements. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:192–200. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bhattacharyya MH. Cadmium osteotoxicity in experimental animals: mechanisms and relationship to human exposures. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2009;238:258–265. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2009.05.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bisai S. Maternal Height as an Independent Risk Factor for Neonatal Size Among Adolescent Bengalees in Kolkata, India. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2010;20:153–158. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v20i3.69444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bloom MS, et al. Birth outcomes and background exposures to select elements, the Longitudinal Investigation of Fertility and the Environment (LIFE) Environ Res. 2015;138:118–129. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bothwell TH. Iron requirements in pregnancy and strategies to meet them. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;72:257S–264S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/72.1.257S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brzóska M, Moniuszko-Jakoniuk J. Bone metabolism of male rats chronically exposed to cadmium. Toxicology and applied pharmacology. 2005a;207:195–211. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2005.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Brzóska M, Moniuszko-Jakoniuk J. Disorders in bone metabolism of female rats chronically exposed to cadmium. Toxicology and applied pharmacology. 2005b;202:68–83. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2004.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. CDC. Fourth Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals, Updated Tables 2013. Atlanta, GA: CDC National Center for Environmental Health; 2013. p. 30341. Available from: [Google Scholar]
  13. Chertok RJ, et al. The effects of CdCl2 on the maternal-to-fetal clearance of 67Cu and placental blood flow. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1984;176:138–142. doi: 10.3181/00379727-176-41853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Croghan C, Egeghy PP. Methods of Dealing With Values Below the Limit of Detection Using SAS. St. Petersburg, FL: Southern SAS User Group; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  15. Engström A, et al. Associations between dietary cadmium exposure and bone mineral density and risk of osteoporosis and fractures among women. Bone. 2012;50:1372–1378. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fréry N, et al. Environmental exposure to cadmium and human birthweight. Toxicology. 1993;79:109–118. doi: 10.1016/0300-483x(93)90124-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Galicia-García V, et al. Cadmium levels in maternal, cord and newborn blood in Mexico City. Toxicol Lett. 1997;91:57–61. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4274(97)03869-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Glass DC, Gray CN. Estimating mean exposures from censored data: exposure to benzene in the Australian petroleum industry. Ann Occup Hyg. 2001;45:275–282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Greenland S. Avoiding power loss associated with categorization and ordinal scores in dose-response and trend analysis. Epidemiology. 1995;6:450–454. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199507000-00025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Heitland P. Fast, simple and reliable routine determination of 23 elements in urine by ICP-MS. J Anal At Spectrom. 2004;19:1552–1558. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hopenhayn C, et al. Arsenic exposure from drinking water and birth weight. Epidemiology. 2003;14:593–602. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000072104.65240.69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Huber PJ. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Vol. 1. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1967. pp. 221–233. [Google Scholar]
  23. IOM et al. Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines. In: Rasmussen K, Yaktine A, editors. Institute of Medicine and the National Research Council. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press; 2009. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. IOM Panel on Micronutrients. Dietary reference intakes for vitamin A, vitamin K, arsenic, boron, chromium, copper, iodine, iron, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, silicon, vanadium, and zinc. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2001. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jaquet D. Ontogeny of leptin in human fetuses and newborns: effect of intrauterine growth retardation on serum leptin concentrations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83 doi: 10.1210/jcem.83.4.4731. 1243-1243-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Järup L, Akesson A. Current status of cadmium as an environmental health problem. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2009;238:201–208. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2009.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Johnston JE, et al. Maternal cadmium levels during pregnancy associated with lower birth weight in infants in a North Carolina cohort. PLoS One. 2014;9:e109661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kido T, et al. Cadmium-induced renal effects. In: Broe ME, et al., editors. Clinical Nephrotoxins. Netherlands, Dordrecht: Springer; 2004. pp. 507–530. [Google Scholar]
  29. King County Environmental Health Services, Findings from Soil Sampling of Vashon-Maury Island Soil Study. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kippler M, et al. Influence of iron and zinc status on cadmium accumulation in Bangladeshi women. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2007;222:221–226. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2007.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kippler M, et al. Sex-specific effects of early life cadmium exposure on DNA methylation and implications for birth weight. Epigenetics. 2013;8:494–503. doi: 10.4161/epi.24401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kippler M, et al. Factors influencing intestinal cadmium uptake in pregnant Bangladeshi women--a prospective cohort study. Environ Res. 2009;109:914–921. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2009.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kippler M, et al. Accumulation of cadmium in human placenta interacts with the transport of micronutrients to the fetus. Toxicol Lett. 2010;192:162–168. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kippler M, et al. Maternal Cadmium Exposure during Pregnancy and Size at Birth: A Prospective Cohort Study. Environ Health Perspect. 2012a;120:284–289. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1103711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kippler M, et al. Environmental exposure to arsenic and cadmium during pregnancy and fetal size: a longitudinal study in rural Bangladesh. Reprod Toxicol. 2012b;34:504–511. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2012.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Klapec T, et al. Selenium in placenta predicts birth weight in normal but not intrauterine growth restriction pregnancy. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2008;22:54–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2007.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Landmann E, et al. Ponderal index for discrimination between symmetric and asymmetric growth restriction: percentiles for neonates from 30 weeks to 43 weeks of gestation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006;19:157–160. doi: 10.1080/14767050600624786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Llanos MN, Ronco AM. Fetal growth restriction is related to placental levels of cadmium, lead and arsenic but not with antioxidant activities. Reprod Toxicol. 2009;27:88–92. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2008.11.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. McElroy JA, et al. Predictors of urinary cadmium levels in adult females. Sci Total Environ. 2007;382:214–223. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Mohanty AF, et al. Infant sex-specific placental cadmium and DNA methylation associations. Environ Res. 2015;138:74–81. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Nishijo M, et al. Effects of maternal exposure to cadmium on pregnancy outcome and breast milk. Occup Environ Med. 2002;59:394–397. doi: 10.1136/oem.59.6.394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Nishijo M, et al. Relationship between newborn size and mother's blood cadmium levels, Toyama, Japan. Arch Environ Health. 2004;59:22–25. doi: 10.3200/AEOH.59.1.22-25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Odland JO, et al. Elements in placenta and pregnancy outcome in arctic and subarctic areas. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2004;63:169–187. doi: 10.3402/ijch.v63i2.17703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Oken E, et al. A nearly continuous measure of birth weight for gestational age using a United States national reference. BMC Pediatr. 2003;3:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-3-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Orloff K, et al. Biomonitoring for environmental exposures to arsenic. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2009;12:509–524. doi: 10.1080/10937400903358934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Osman K, et al. Toxic and essential elements in placentas of Swedish women. Clin Biochem. 2000;33:131–138. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9120(00)00052-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Patterson RE, et al. Measurement characteristics of the Women's Health Initiative food frequency questionnaire. Ann Epidemiol. 1999;9:178–187. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(98)00055-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Qiu C, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus in relation to maternal dietary heme iron and nonheme iron intake. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:1564–1569. doi: 10.2337/dc11-0135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Rahman A, et al. Arsenic exposure during pregnancy and size at birth: a prospective cohort study in Bangladesh. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;169:304–312. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Ronco AM, et al. Cadmium exposure during pregnancy reduces birth weight and increases maternal and foetal glucocorticoids. Toxicol Lett. 2009;188:186–191. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Salpietro CD, et al. Cadmium concentration in maternal and cord blood and infant birth weight: a study on healthy non-smoking women. J Perinat Med. 2002;30:395–399. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2002.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Satarug S, Moore MR. Adverse Health Effects of Chronic Exposure to Low-Level Cadmium in Foodstuffs and Cigarette Smoke. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112:1099–1103. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Schakel SF. Maintaining a nutrient database in a changing marketplace: Keeping pace with changing food products-A research perspective. National Nutrient Databank Conference. 2004;14:315–322. [Google Scholar]
  54. Shirai S, et al. Maternal exposure to low-level heavy metals during pregnancy and birth size. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2010;45:1468–1474. doi: 10.1080/10934529.2010.500942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Stasenko S, et al. Metals in human placenta: focus on the effects of cadmium on steroid hormones and leptin. J Appl Toxicol. 2010;30:242–253. doi: 10.1002/jat.1490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Sun H, et al. The effects of prenatal exposure to low-level cadmium, lead and selenium on birth outcomes. Chemosphere. 2014;108:33–39. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.02.080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Tellez-Plaza M, et al. Cadmium exposure and incident cardiovascular disease. Epidemiology. 2013;24:421–429. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31828b0631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Tian L-L, et al. Effects of gestational cadmium exposure on pregnancy outcome and development in the offspring at age 4.5 years. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2009;132:51–59. doi: 10.1007/s12011-009-8391-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Vidal AC, et al. Maternal cadmium, iron and zinc levels, DNA methylation and birth weight. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015;16:20. doi: 10.1186/s40360-015-0020-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. White BH. A heteroskedasticity - consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica. 1980;48:817–838. [Google Scholar]
  61. WHO. Biological Monitoring of Chemical Exposure in the Workplace. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  62. Wier PJ, et al. Toxicity of cadmium in the perfused human placenta. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1990;105:156–171. doi: 10.1016/0041-008x(90)90367-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Wilcox AJ. On the importance--and the unimportance--of birthweight. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30:1233–1241. doi: 10.1093/ije/30.6.1233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Xu L, et al. Decrease in birth weight and gestational age by arsenic among the newborn in Shanghai, China. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2011;58:89–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Xu X, et al. Associations of cadmium, bisphenol A and polychlorinated biphenyl co-exposure in utero with placental gene expression and neonatal outcomes. Reprod Toxicol. 2015;52:62–70. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2015.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Zhang Y-L, et al. Effect of environmental exposure to cadmium on pregnancy outcome and fetal growth: a study on healthy pregnant women in China. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2004;39:2507–2515. doi: 10.1081/ese-200026331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

RESOURCES