Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2016 May 12;4(3):e00358-16. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00358-16

Draft Genome Sequences of Four Plant Probiotic Bacillus Strains

Haeyoung Jeong a,b,, Seung-Hwan Park a,b, Soo-Keun Choi a,b,
PMCID: PMC4866849  PMID: 27174273

Abstract

Here, we report the whole-genome sequences of four Bacillus strains that exhibit plant probiotic activities. Three of them are the type strains of Bacillus endophyticus, “Bacillus gaemokensis,” and Bacillus trypoxylicola, and the other, Bacillus sp. strain KCTC 13219, should be reclassified into a species belonging to the genus Lysinibacillus.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Bacillus is one of the most extensively studied microorganisms among plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Owing to the production of various antibiotics and the formation of stress-resistant endospores, Bacillus strains are more amenable to the formulation of commercial products and have been widely used as biocontrol agents (1). Induced systemic resistance (ISR) elicited by Bacillus strains has been recently recognized as one of the key mechanisms by which crops can protect themselves against phytopathogens with the aid of PGPR (2, 3).

The four Bacillus strains sequenced in this study, all purchased from the Korean Collection for Type Cultures (KCTC), were chosen based on the partial results of a systematic screening approach used to search for plant probiotic bacteria. The three type strains, Bacillus endophyticus KCTC 13922 (4), “Bacillus gaemokensis” KCTC 13318 (5), and Bacillus trypoxylicola KCTC 13244 (6), were shown to promote plant growth (Arabidopsis thaliana) by volatiles, whereas Bacillus sp. strain KCTC 13219 (=b04i-3) triggers ISR in A. thaliana against Pectobacterium carotovorum (our unpublished data). The type strains B. gaemokensis JCM 15801 and B. trypoxylicola NRBC 102646, obtained from the Japan Collection of Microorganisms (JCM) and the NITE Biological Resource Center (NBRC), respectively, were sequenced by other research groups and made available through accession numbers JOTM00000000 (7) and BCWA00000000 while this paper was being prepared.

Genome sequencing was carried out using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform at the National Instrument Center for Environmental Management at Seoul National University (Seoul, Republic of Korea). One hundred one-nucleotide paired reads produced from a library with a fragment size of ca. 500 bp were pretreated using Trimmomatic version 0.32 (8), and 600-Mb subsamples were randomly extracted from them. After k-mer-based error correction using SGA version 0.10.13 (9), de novo genome assembly was conducted using the A5-miseq pipeline (10). The assembled sequences were annotated using the RAST server (11) and Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline from the NCBI. Biosynthetic genes for secondary metabolites were predicted using antiSMASH 3.0 (12). The list of strains used in this study, the sequencing and assembly statistics, and the accession numbers are all provided in Table 1. Compared with the previously published records, the genome sequences of KCTC 13318 and KCTC 13244 obtained through this study were shown to be superior in terms of the assembly statistics.

TABLE 1 .

Summary of genome sequencing results

Bacillus species Draft coverage (×)a Genome size (bp) No. of contigs G+C content (%) No. of secondary metabolite biosynthesis gene clustersb Accession no.
B. endophyticus KCTC 13922T 741 5,121,484 42 36.50 11 LTAP00000000
B. gaemokensis KCTC 13318T 878 5,616,250 70 35.54 18 LTAQ00000000
B. trypoxylicola KCTC 13244T 9,024 4,347,941 40 35.73 6 LTAO00000000
Bacillus sp. KCTC 13219 1,244 3,853,058 37 38.31 3 LUFJ00000000
a

Subsamples of 600 Mb were randomly taken from pretreated reads and assembled.

b

Predicted by antiSMASH 3.0.

KCTC 13219, isolated from Pu-erh tea, was tentatively named “Bacillus nitroreducens” by the submitter but did not lead to a proposal for a novel species (J. S. Lee, personal communication). Very recently, the species Bacillus nitroreducens sp. nov. was proposed for another unrelated bacterium (13). Phylogenetic analysis using the 16S rRNA sequence revealed that KCTC 13219 should be classified into the genus Lysinibacillus (99.93% similarity with “Lysinibacillus fluoroglycofernilyticus” cmg86T). The genome sequencing results will provide insight into the genomic basis of the versatile Bacillus strains and the interspecies interaction between soil bacteria and plants, which can lead to eco-friendly agricultural applications. Additional information is available at http://genoglobe.kr/kribb/four_bacillus_strains_2016.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

These whole-genome shotgun projects have been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank, and the accession numbers for all four genome sequences are listed in Table 1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank Jung-Sook Lee (KCTC) for her helpful discussions.

This work was supported by the Industrial Source Technology Development Program of the Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy (grant 10044909), and by the KRIBB Research Initiative Program, Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, Republic of Korea.

Footnotes

Citation Jeong H, Park S-H, Choi S-K. 2016. Draft genome sequences of four plant probiotic Bacillus strains. Genome Announc 4(3):e00358-16. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00358-16

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ongena M, Jacques P. 2008. Bacillus lipopeptides: versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol. Trends Microbiol 16:115–125. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2007.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Choudhary DK, Johri BN. 2009. Interactions of Bacillus spp. and plants—with special reference to induced systemic resistance (ISR). Microbiol Res 164:493–513. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2008.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kloepper JW, Ryu CM, Zhang S. 2004. Induced systemic resistance and promotion of plant growth by Bacillus spp. Phytopathology 94:1259–1266. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.11.1259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Reva ON, Smirnov VV, Pettersson B, Priest FG. 2002. Bacillus endophyticus sp. nov., isolated from the inner tissues of cotton plants (Gossypium sp.). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:101–107. doi: 10.1099/00207713-52-1-101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jung MY, Paek WK, Park IS, Han JR, Sin Y, Paek J, Rhee MS, Kim H, Song HS, Chang YH. 2010. Bacillus gaemokensis sp. nov., isolated from foreshore tidal flat sediment from the Yellow Sea. J Microbiol 48:867–871. doi: 10.1007/s12275-010-0148-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Aizawa T, Urai M, Iwabuchi N, Nakajima M, Sunairi M. 2010. Bacillus trypoxylicola sp. nov., xylanase-producing alkaliphilic bacteria isolated from the guts of Japanese horned beetle larvae (Trypoxylus dichotomus septentrionalis). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60:61–66. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.005843-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liu Y, Lai Q, Göker M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Wang M, Sun Y, Wang L, Shao Z. 2015. Genomic insights into the taxonomic status of the Bacillus cereus group. Sci Rep 5:14082. doi: 10.1038/srep14082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Simpson JT, Durbin R. 2012. Efficient de novo assembly of large genomes using compressed data structures. Genome Res 22:549–556. doi: 10.1101/gr.126953.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Coil D, Jospin G, Darling AE. 2015. A5-miseq: an updated pipeline to assemble microbial genomes from Illumina MiSeq data. Bioinformatics 31:587–589. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Weber T, Blin K, Duddela S, Krug D, Kim HU, Bruccoleri R, Lee SY, Fischbach MA, Müller R, Wohlleben W, Breitling R, Takano E, Medema MH. 2015. antiSMASH 3.0–a comprehensive resource for the genome mining of biosynthetic gene clusters. Nucleic Acids Res 43:W237–W243. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Guo J, Wang YQ, Yang G, Chen Y, Zhou S, Zhao Y, Zhuang L. 2016. Bacillus nitroreducens sp. nov., a humus-reducing bacterium isolated from a compost. Arch Microbiol 198:347–352. doi: 10.1007/s00203-016-1193-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES