Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 May 16;6:26067. doi: 10.1038/srep26067

One-pot conversion of disaccharide into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural catalyzed by imidazole ionic liquid

Yongshui Qu 1, Li Li 1,2, Quanyuan Wei 3, Chongpin Huang 2, Piotr Oleskowicz-Popiel 4, Jian Xu 1,a
PMCID: PMC4867639  PMID: 27181523

Abstract

Conversion of carbohydrate into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5- HMF), a versatile, key renewable platform compound is regarded as an important transformation in biomass-derived carbohydrate chemistry. A variety of ILs, not only acidic but also alkaline ILs, were synthesized and used as catalyst in the production of 5-HMF from disaccharide. Several factors including reaction temperature, IL dosage, solvent and reaction time,were found to influence the yield of 5-HMF from cellobiose. Of the ILs tested, hydroxy-functionalized ionic liquid (IL), 1-hydroxyethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([AEMIM]BF4) showed the highest catalytic activity and selectivity. 5-HMF yield of 68.71% from sucrose was obtained after 6 hrs at 160 °C. At the same condition with cellobiose as substrate, 5-HMF yield was 24.73%. In addition, 5-HMF also exhibited good stablity in this reaction system. Moreover, a kinetic analysis was carried out in both acidic and alkaline IL-catalyzed system, suggesting main side reaction in the conversion of fructose catalyzed by acidic and alkaline IL was polymerization of fructose and 5-HMF degradation, respectively.

The massive consumption of fossil resources has made it an essential task to find new feedstocks. Biomass has a remarkable potential to serve as an alternative of fossil resources for the production of energy and organic compounds1,2,3. 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5- HMF) has been reported to be one of the top building block chemicals obtained from biomass4,5. A broad range of value added compounds can be synthesized from it, such as 1,6-hexanediol6, 5-hydroxymethyl-2-furancarboxylic acid (HMFCA)7, 5-ethoxymethylfurfural (EMF)8, 2,5-dihydroxymethylfurfural (DHMF) and 5-hydroxymethyl furanoic acid (HMFA)9, 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid10, 2,5-diformylfuran (2,5-DFF)11, 5-formyl-2-furancarboxylic acid (FFCA) and 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid (FDCA)12.

Since the emergence of room temperature ionic liquids (ILs), it has been playing an important role in various aspects of chemical researches. The distinctive properties give ILs a chance to be used extensively in catalysis13,14 and subsequently in biomass processing15,16. In marked contrast to many studies with the application of ILs as solvent or co-solvent on 5-HMF production5,17, very few have been focused on ILs’ catalytic activity. Although there is a growing literature on dehydration of C-6 carbohydrates, mainly fructose and glucose18,19, for the production of 5-HMF, little is available on conversion of dissacharide. When 1-methyl-3-octylimidazolium chloride was used as solvent and CrCl2/HCl as catalyst, 5-HMF yield could reach 82 ± 3.7% from sucrose, higher than that with ZnCl2/HCl as catalyst which was 58 ± 2.7%20. Ilgen21 demonstrated the production of 5-HMF in ILs with the presence of CrCl2 and a maximum 5-HMF yield of 42% was obtained from the dehydration of sucrose under 100 °C for 1 h. Lima et al.22 reported a 5-HMF yield of 58% achieved using [BMIM]Cl as reaction medium with a mass ratio of IL to sucrose at 10 with CrCl3·H2O at 100 °C for 4h. The conversion of sucrose and cellobiose to 5-HMF catalyzed by Lewis acid (SnCl4) was studied by Hu et al.23, using 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([EMIM]BF4) as solvent at 100 °C for 3 h and obtained the highest yield of 57% and 65%, respectively. All the above-mentioned ILs are neutral or acidic, and dehydration is promoted due to enhanced dissolution of catalysts and substrates. Although alkaline ILs, display high activity for some Brønsted base-catalyzed reactions (Knoevenagal condensation reaction and Michael addition24,25) and also can be switched repeatedly by bubbling COX and NOX through the solution alternately26,27,28,29, to our knowledge there have been little reports of the use of alkaline ILs as a catalyst for the conversion of carbohydrates to 5-HMF.

In the present study, Brønsted acidic IL, 1-(3-sulfonic acid) propyl-3-methylimidazolium phosphotungstate ([MIMPS]3PW12O40), and a variety of alkaline ILs, 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hydroxide ([BMIM]OH), 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium hydroxide ([EMIM]OH), 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium carbonate ([BMIM]HCO3) and hydroxy-functionalized IL, 1-hydroxyethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([AEMIM]BF4) were synthesized and used as catalyst in the conversion of disacharide (sucrose and cellobiose) to 5-HMF, which has not been reported. In addition, kinetic analysis on reaction catalyzed by different ILs was carried out to identify the catalytic effect of different ILs-catalyst on the conversion of dissacharide to 5-HMF.

Results

Sucrose conversion with different IL catalysts

The effect of ILs with different cations and anions, employed as catalysts for the transformation of sucrose was shown in Table 1 (P < 0.05). Among different kinds of solvents used for the conversion of sucrose with [MIMPS]3PW12O40 as catalyst (P < 0.05) (Table 1, entry 1–4), a comparable high yield of 5-HMF was obtained using 2-Butanol as solvent (Table 1, entry 1), compared to DMAc, NMP and DMSO (Table 1, entry 2–4), consistent with the results in a previous study30. The 5-HMF yield, catalyzed by alkaline ILs (Table 1, entry 5–8) was invariably higher than that obtained with the acidic catalyst (Table 1, entry 1–4). The highest yield was found to be 68.71% catalyzed by [AEMIM]BF4 in DMSO (Table 1, entry 8), suggesting that weak alkaline condition favored the reaction. Moreover, the yield sustained growth during the reaction time (Table 1, entry 8–10) demonstrating that 5-HMF exhibited good stability in this reaction system (P < 0.05).

Table 1. Dehydration of sucrose with different ILs.

Entry ILs Solvent Time (min) 5-HMF yield (%)
1 [MIMPS]3PW12O40 2-Butanol 180 30.29 ± 1.14
2 [MIMPS]3PW12O40 DMAc 300 25.92 ± 0.78
3 [MIMPS]3PW12O40 NMP 150 15.81 ± 0.48
4 [MIMPS]3PW12O40 DMSO 360 18.90 ± 0.78
5 [BMIM]HCO3 DMSO 180 41.17 ± 1.44
6 [EMIM]OH DMSO 30 46.29 ± 1.22
7 [BMIM]OH DMSO 180 54.39 ± 1.19
8 [AEMIM]BF4 DMSO 480 68.71 ± 0.90
9 [AEMIM]BF4 DMSO 30 35.46 ± 1.38
10 [AEMIM]BF4 DMSO 180 62.16 ± 1.41
Open in a new tab

Conditions: 0.5 g substrate, 0.25 g ILs, 60 mL solvent, 160 °C.

Effect of composition of the reaction medium on cellobiose conversion

As shown in Fig. 1, there was a huge difference in the conversion of cellobiose into 5-HMF with different solvents (P < 0.01). The highest yield of 5-HMF in the reaction carried out at 160 °C in DMSO reached 34.25% in 6hrs. However, the yield was only 23.77% under the same condition with DMF as solvent.

Figure 1. Effect of solvents on 5-HMF yield.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Conditions: 0.25 g [AEMIM]BF4, 0.5 g cellobiose, 60 mL solvent, at 160 °C, with the presence of N2.

For the reaction with DMAc and NMP as solvent, the highest yield of 5-HMF (26.29% and 12.44%, respectively) was obtained in 60 mins and 40 mins, followed by a quick reduction. In another 3 solvents, MIBK, 2-butanol and DMAc-LiCl, trace amounts of 5-HMF can be ignored. It might be concluded that 5-HMF stability is dependent on reaction solvent, i.e.,DMSO > DMF > DMAc > NMP > MIBK > 2-butanol > DMAc-LiCl. Moreover, the huge difference between DMAc-LiCl and DMAc indicates that the addition of metal chloride was not conducive to 5-HMF production, which was different from the reported system with ILs as solvent catalyzed by metal chloride31,32.

Effect of temperature and reaction time on cellobiose conversion

Figure 2 shows the effect of temperature and reaction time on the conversion of cellobiose catalyzed by [AEMIM]BF4, using DMSO as solvent (P < 0.05). At 120 °C and 140 °C, the yields of 5-HMF increased slowly to 9.44% and 14.86% respectively after 300 mins. It presented the similar trend at 160 °C. However, the 5-HMF formation was obviously enhanced. At 180 °C, although the 5-HMF yield increased rapidly at the initial stage and the maximum 5-HMF yield of 24.73% was obtained at 90 min, it then dropped dramatically. It could thus be concluded that higher temperature could accelerate the conversion of cellobiose into 5-HMF and in the mean time, it raised the risk of 5-HMF degradation.

Figure 2. Effect of temperature and time on 5-HMF yield.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Conditions: [AEMIM]BF4 0.25 g, cellobiose 0.5g, in 60 mL DMSO, under N2.

Effect of the dosage of IL catalyst on the yield of 5-HMF

Figure 3 shows the effect of the amounts of [AEMIM]BF4 on 5-HMF yield in the cellobiose transformation reaction (P < 0.05). An evident conclusion could be drawn from Fig. 3 that increasing the ratio of catalyst to cellobiose (R) from 0.2 to 0.5 will promote significantly the conversion of cellobiose to 5-HMF from 31.87% to 40.19% after 5 h, respectively. Further increasing the dosage of catalysts to 1.0, although the time to obtain the maximum 5-HMF yield was reduced to within 2 hrs, it was only 21.1%, much lower than that from R at 0.2 and 0.5. Moreover, the 5-HMF yield showed a sharp decrease after 2 hrs for R at 1.0. The reactivity difference might be ascribed to be the fact that IL catalyst typically exhibit high activity not only in conversion of cellobiose, but also in the polymerization of cellobiose, glucose, 5-HMF, and other small molecule compounds during degradation process.

Figure 3. Effect of catalyst amount on 5-HMF yield.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Conditions: cellobiose 0.5g, 60 mL DMSO, 160 °C, under N2.

Kinetic analysis of the dehydration of fructose

During conversion of disaccharide into 5-HMF, three reactions are involved, namely the hydrolysis of the disaccharide into its components (fructose and glucose), isomerization of glucose into fructose, and dehydration of fructose. In order to study the process of 5-HMF formation, the kinetic analysis of the dehydration of fructose catalyzed by ILs in DMSO was performed based on two step continuous reaction33 as shown in Fig. 4: hydrolysis of fructose into 5-HMF and by-products2; degradation of 5-HMF into by-products1, including formic acid, levulinic acid, humin, and so on. These components, coming from decomposition and polymerization of 5-HMF and fructose, can be analyzed by HPLC or observation, corresponded to some publications34,35.

Figure 4. Kinetic model for dehydration of fructose catalyzed by ILs.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

The conversion of 5-HMF is considered as a first-order reaction. 5-HMF generation rate and fructose consumption rate are shown as follows:

graphic file with name srep26067-m1.jpg
graphic file with name srep26067-m2.jpg

Eq. (3) and (4) can be achieved by integrating Eq. (1) and (2), k1 and k2 are step rate constants, which are constant at a definite temperature:

graphic file with name srep26067-m3.jpg
graphic file with name srep26067-m4.jpg

Substituting Inline graphic from Eq. (3) into Eq. (4) gives Eq. (5):

graphic file with name srep26067-m6.jpg

By integrating the above equation leads to the following:

graphic file with name srep26067-m7.jpg
graphic file with name srep26067-m8.jpg

Values of Inline graphic (where X is conversion of fructose) are plotted against reaction time (t) at different temperatures in order to obtain rate constants (k). Table 1 shows the relationship between the rate constant and reaction temperature. The results show that k value increases as temperature increases, meaning that the higher temperature accelerates the fructose dehydration reaction rate.

Compared to alkaline system (Table 2, entry 5–8), k3 in acidic system (Table 2, entry 1–4) grows faster when temperature is increased from 100 °C to 160 °C. It is why the rate of humin, coming from polymerization of fructose and 5-HMF, lactic acid, etc., rise faster at a higher temperature.

Table 2. Reaction rate constants (k) of fructose dehydration at different temperatures.

  Entry T ( °C) k(min−1) k1(min−1) k2(min−1) k3(min−1)
A: Acidic ILs 1 100 0.00399 ± 2.83 × 10−4 0.00053 ± 2.83 × 10−5 1.3E-05 ± 2.19 × 10−6 0.003275 ± 4.74 × 10−4
2 120 0.01205 ± 6.72 × 10−4 0.009665±1.34 × 10−4 0.000116 ± 7.78 × 10−6 0.00265 ± 1.56 × 10−4
3 140 0.03202 ± 0.002638 0.02178 ± 3.96 × 10−4 0.000804 ± 6.54 × 10−5 0.01121 ± 8.63 × 10−4
4 160 0.08802 ± 6.20 × 10−3 0.04375 ± 7.21 × 10−4 0.00515 ± 4.24 × 10−4 0.037116 ± 3.2 × 10−3
B: Alkaline ILs 5 120 0.000262 ± 7.42 × 10−5 0.000123 ± 4.96 × 10−6 8.89E-06 ± 1.91 × 10−7 0.000083 ± 8.49 × 10−7
6 140 0.001329 ± 1.2 × 10−5 0.000892 ± 6.15 × 10−5 2.36E-05 ± 3.04 × 10−6 0.000408 ± 1.17 × 10−4
7 160 0.008017 ± 1.46 × 10−4 0.00596 ± 1.7 × 10−4 0.000097 ± 3.25 × 10−6 0.001757 ± 1.08 × 10−4
8 180 0.03333 ± 1.32 × 10−4 0.02489 ± 4.53 × 10−4 0.000341 ± 3.82 × 10−5 0.00865 ± 5.79 × 10−4
Open in a new tab

Conditions: 0.25 g catalyst, 0.5 g fructose, 60 mL DMSO; acidic and alkaline ILs were [MIMPS]3PW12O40 and [AEMIM]BF4.

graphic file with name srep26067-m10.jpg
graphic file with name srep26067-m11.jpg

Figure 5A,B show relationship of ln k and −10−4/RT, using the rate constants, an Arrhenius plot is generated based on Eq. (8) & (9). The kinetic parameters for ILs catalyzed dehydration of fructose to 5-HMF, Inline graphic(slope) and A (intercept is ln A) are summarized in Table 3.

Figure 5. Relationship of lnk and −10−4/RT.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Table 3. Pre-exponential factor and activation energy of fructose conversion.

  Pre-exponential factor, A (min–1) Activation energy, Ea (kJ∙mol–1)
A1 A2 A3 Ea1 Ea2 Ea3
Acidic ILs 5.06 × 1010 4.95 × 1013 1.32 × 105 99.78 136.48 58.84
AlkalineILs 5.44 × 109 1.47 × 107 9.17 × 1014 110.81 96.48 153.47
Open in a new tab

The values of activation energy and pre-exponential factor of 5-HMF degradation (A2 and Ea2, 1.47 × 107 and 96.48 kJ·mol−1) catalyzed by alkaline ILs are lower than those (4.95 × 1013 and 136.48 kJ·mol−1) in acidic catalyst system, meaning that 5-HMF is degraded into small molecules such as levulinic acid, formic acid much faster than that catalyzed by [MIMPS]3PW12O40. Moreover, higher Ea1 and Ea3 (110.81 kJ·mol−1and 153.47 kJ·mol−1) cause the reaction rate greatly influenced by temperature, and can thus quickly reach the reaction equilibrium.

Discussion

An efficient synthesis of 5-HMF by conversion of disaccharide has been achieved using ILs as catalysts. Several factors were found to influence the yield of 5-HMF from cellobiose, such as reaction temperature, the dosage of IL, solvent and reaction time. Of the ILs tested, [AEMIM]BF4 showed the highest catalytic activity and selectivity, and a 68.21% yield of 5-HMF from sucrose was obtained after 6 h when it was employed at 160 °C. At same reaction, 5-HMF yield was 24.73% in the conversion of cellobiose. In addition, a kinetic analysis was carried out on both acidic and alkaline IL-catalyzed system, suggesting main side reaction in the conversion of fructose catalyzed by acidic and alkaline IL was polymerization of fructose and 5-HMF degradation, respectively. Although the catalyzed mechanism needs to be further studied, the results obtained from the present investigation might encourage researchers to consider ILs as potential catalysts for organic reactions rather than simply as solvents.

Methods

Materials and experimental methods

N-methylimidazole was purchased from Aladdin Chemical Co., Ltd. 2-Chloroethylaminehydrochloride, dichloroethanol, and acetone from Shanghai Jingchun Chemical Reagent Company. Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), dimethyl acetamide (DMAc), N,N-dimethylformamide(DMF), n-butanol, 2-butanol, methylisobutylketone (MIBK), sodium tetrafluoroborate, ether, ethanol, sodium borate (NaBF4),sucrose, cellobiose, glucose and fructose were purchased from Beijing Chemical Reagent Company. All reagents were used as supplied without further purification.

The hydroxy-functionalized ILs, [AEMIM]BF4 27,28,29 was synthesized as follows: 0.10 mol N-methylimidazole (8.20 g) and 0.10 mol 2-bromoethylamine hydrobromide (20.50 g) were dissolved into 60 ml ethanol, and stirred at 80 °C under nitrogen atmosphere. After 24 hrs, the mixture was filtered, and washed with ethanol for three times. The residue was dissolved into 40 ml of CH3CN/H2O (1:1, v/v) with the addition of 0.10 mol NaBF4 (10.98 g). It was stirred at 30 °C for another 24 hrs and then, evaporated in vacuum. The obtained yellow liquid was washed with chloroform and ether for three times, respectively. After drying at 60 °C for 24 h in vacuum, pure [AEMIM]BF4 was obtained with the yield of 74.4%.

Other ILs were also synthesized by two-step methods: synthesis of imidazolium chloride precursor followed by anion exchange as described by Cai et al.13. ILs containing different cations and anions, including [MIMPS]3PW12O40 36, [BMIM]OH37, [EMIM]OH38 and [BMIM]HCO3 39 were prepared.

General procedure for the conversion of carbohydrates to 5-HMF

In the dehydration reaction, 0.5 g of carbohydrate, 0.25 g of catalyst and 60 mL of solvent were mixed in a 100-mL flask equipped with a condenser and heated to certain reaction temperature. After dehydration, the mixture was analyzed by HPLC. During the dehydration reaction, disaccharide was hydrolyzed into glucose and fructose, glucose can be isomerized into fructose and the later loses three water molecules to produce HMF in the presence of catalyst (Fig. 6).

Figure 6. Reaction process for the dehydration.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

After reaction, the mixture was filtered through 0.45μm pore size membrane and the filtrate was transferred into a volumetric flask and diluted with water. 5-HMF and furfural were analyzed by HPLC (Agilent LC1260 infinity, USA) using a C18 column and UV detector at 35 °C with methanol / water (40/60, v/v) as eluent at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min.

Statistical Analysis

Based on data distribution, one-way and two-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare different groups. The P value was calculated, which less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant with P < 0.05.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Yongshui, Q. et al. One-pot conversion of disaccharide into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural catalyzed by imidazole ionic liquid. Sci. Rep. 6, 26067; doi: 10.1038/srep26067 (2016).

Acknowledgments

The work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21276259), International (Regional) Cooperation And Exchange Project (No. 21450110062), National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program: 2012AA022301), University-Institute Cooperation Funds from University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. Y552017Y00) and Technology Plan Projects of Beijing (No. Z14110000061404).

Footnotes

Author Contributions Y.Q., C.H. and J.X. conceived and designed experiments. Y.Q., L.L., Q.W. and P.O.P. carried out experiments. Y.Q., L.L., Q.W., P.O.P. and J.X. analyzed data and prepared figures. Y.Q., Q.W., P.O.P. and J.X. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

References

  1. Falter C. et al. Glucanocellulosic ethanol: the undiscovered biofuel potential in energy crops and marine biomass. Sci Rep-Uk 5, doi: Artn 1372210.1038/Srep13722 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Guo X. C. et al. Conversion of biomass-derived sorbitol to glycols over carbon-materials supported Ru-based catalysts. Sci Rep-Uk 5, doi: Artn 1645110.1038/Srep16451 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Teong S. P., Yi G. S. & Zhang Y. G. Hydroxymethylfurfural production from bioresources: past, present and future. Green Chem 16, 2015–2026, doi: 10.1039/c3gc42018c (2014). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang J. J. et al. Direct conversion of carbohydrates to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural using Sn-Mont catalyst. Green Chem 14, 2506–2512, doi: 10.1039/c2gc35699f (2012). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wu L. Q. et al. Very efficient conversion of glucose to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in DBU-based ionic Liquids with benzenesulfonate anion. Green Chem 16, 3935–3941, doi: 10.1039/c4gc00311j (2014). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Tuteja J., Choudhary H., Nishimura S. & Ebitani K. Direct Synthesis of 1,6-Hexanediol from HMF over a Heterogeneous Pd/ZrP Catalyst using Formic Acid as Hydrogen Source. Chemsuschem 7, 96–100, doi: 10.1002/cssc.201300832 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang Z. H., Liu B., Lv K. L., Sun J. & Deng K. J. Aerobic oxidation of biomass derived 5-hydroxymethylfurfural into 5-hydroxymethyl-2-furancarboxylic acid catalyzed by a montmorillonite K-10 clay immobilized molybdenum acetylacetonate complex. Green Chem 16, 2762–2770, doi: 10.1039/c4gc00062e (2014). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang H. L. et al. Graphene oxide as a facile acid catalyst for the one-pot conversion of carbohydrates into 5-ethoxymethylfurfural. Green Chem 15, 2379–2383, doi: 10.1039/c3gc41109e (2013). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Subbiah S., Simeonov S. P., Esperanca J. M. S. S., Rebelo L. P. N. & Afonso C. A. M. Direct transformation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural to the building blocks 2,5-dihydroxymethylfurfural (DHMF) and 5-hydroxymethyl furanoic acid (HMFA) via Cannizzaro reaction. Green Chem 15, 2849–2853, doi: 10.1039/c3gc40930a (2013). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rass H. A., Essayem N. & Besson M. Selective aqueous phase oxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural to 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid over Pt/C catalysts: influence of the base and effect of bismuth promotion. Green Chem 15, 2240–2251, doi: 10.1039/c3gc40727f (2013). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Yang Z. Z., Deng J., Pan T., Guo Q. X. & Fu Y. A one-pot approach for conversion of fructose to 2,5-diformylfuran by combination of Fe3O4-SBA-SO3H and K-OMS-2. Green Chem 14, 2986–2989, doi: 10.1039/c2gc35947b (2012). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Xie J. H., Nie J. F. & Liu H. C. Aqueous-phase selective aerobic oxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural on Ru/C in the presence of base. Chinese J Catal 35, 937–944, doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(14)60136-4 (2014). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cai Y. Q., Peng Y. Q. & Song G. H. Amino-functionalized ionic liquid as an efficient and recyclable catalyst for Knoevenagel reactions in water. Catal Lett 109, 61–64, doi: 10.1007/s10562-006-0057-3 (2006). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hou Y. D. & Wang X. C. Ionic Liquid Co-catalyzed Artificial Photosynthesis of CO. Sci Rep-Uk 3, doi: Artn 105610.1038/Srep01056 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  15. Parvulescu V. I. & Hardacre C. Catalysis in ionic liquids. Chem Rev 107, 2615–2665, doi: 10.1021/cr050948h (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Weber C. C., Masters A. F. & Maschmeyer T. Structural features of ionic liquids: consequences for material preparation and organic reactivity. Green Chem 15, 2655–2679, doi: 10.1039/c3gc41313f (2013). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zakrzewska M. E., Bogel-Lukasik E. & Bogel-Lukasik R. Ionic Liquid-Mediated Formation of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural-A Promising Biomass-Derived Building Block. Chem Rev 111, 397–417, doi: 10.1021/cr100171a (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chun J. A., Lee J. W., Yi Y. B., Hong S. S. & Chung C. H. Catalytic production of hydroxymethylfurfural from sucrose using 1-methyl-3-octylimidazolium chloride ionic liquid. Korean J Chem Eng 27, 930–935, doi: 10.1007/s11814-010-0167-x (2010). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang T. F., Nolte M. W. & Shanks B. H. Catalytic dehydration of C-6 carbohydrates for the production of hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) as a versatile platform chemical. Green Chem 16, 548–572, doi: 10.1039/c3gc41365a (2014). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhao H. B., Holladay J. E., Brown H. & Zhang Z. C. Metal chlorides in ionic liquid solvents convert sugars to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural. Science 316, 1597–1600, doi: 10.1126/science.1141199 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ilgen F. et al. Conversion of carbohydrates into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in highly concentrated low melting mixtures. Green Chem 11, 1948–1954, doi: 10.1039/b917548m (2009). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lima S. et al. Conversion of mono/di/polysaccharides into furan compounds using 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium ionic liquids. Appl Catal a-Gen 363, 93–99, doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2009.04.049 (2009). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hu S. Q. et al. Direct conversion of inulin to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in biorenewable ionic liquids. Green Chem 11, 873–877, doi: 10.1039/b822328a (2009). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Luo S. Z. et al. Functionalized ionic liquids catalyzed direct aldol reactions. Tetrahedron 63, 1923–1930, doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2006.12.079 (2007). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Xu J. M., Qian C., Liu B. K., Wu Q. & Lin X. F. A fast and highly efficient protocol for Michael addition of N-heterocycles to alpha,beta-unsaturated compound using basic ionic liquid [bmIm]OH as catalyst and green solvent. Tetrahedron 63, 986–990, doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2006.11.013 (2007). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Yu Y. H. et al. Ship-in-a-bottle synthesis of amine-functionalized ionic liquids in NaY zeolite for CO2 capture. Sci Rep-Uk 4, doi: Artn 599710.1038/Srep05997 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Li W. J. et al. Switching the basicity of ionic liquids by CO(2). Green Chem 10, 1142–1145, doi: 10.1039/b811624e (2008). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sun H., Zhou X. Q., Xue Z. M., Zhou Z. Y. & Mu T. C. Theoretical investigations on the reaction mechanisms of amine-functionalized ionic liquid [aEMMIM][BF4] and CO2. Int J Greenh Gas Con 20, 43–48, doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.10.025 (2014). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sharma P. et al. Solubility of carbon dioxide in amine-functionalized ionic liquids: Role of the anions. Chem Eng J 193, 267–275, doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.04.015 (2012). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Qu Y. S., Huang C. P., Zhang J. & Chen B. H. Efficient dehydration of fructose to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural catalyzed by a recyclable sulfonated organic heteropolyacid salt. Bioresource Technol 106, 170–172, doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.069 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Qi X. H., Watanabe M., Aida T. M. & Smith R. L. Catalytic conversion of cellulose into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in high yields via a two-step process. Cellulose 18, 1327–1333, doi: 10.1007/s10570-011-9568-1 (2011). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Tian Y. K., Deng J., Pan T., Guo Q. X. & Fu Y. Dehydration of Glucose and Fructose into 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural Catalyzed by Lewis Acid in Ionic Liquids. Chinese J Catal 32, 997–1002, doi: 10.3724/Sp.J.1088.2011.01258 (2011). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lentini S., Galloni P., Garcia-Bosch I., Costas M. & Conte V. Ionic liquids as reaction media in catalytic oxidations with manganese and iron pyridyl triazacyclononane complexes. Inorg Chim Acta 410, 60–64, doi: 10.1016/j.ica.2013.10.016 (2014). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Waseem M. A. et al. [bmIm]OH catalyzed hetero-cyclisation of o-halobenzoic acid and alkyne: A green approach to synthesize isocoumarins. Catal Commun 55, 70–73, doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2014.06.010 (2014). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Qin W. D., Wei H. P. & Li S. F. Y. 1,3-dialkylimidazolium-based room-temperature ionic liquids as background electrolyte and coating material in aqueous capillary electrophoresis. J Chromatogr A 985, 447–454, doi: 10.1007/s10570-011-9568-1 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ma Y. Q. & Wang R. H2S Absorption Capacity of Ionic Liquid-MDEA-H2O Combined Desulfurizers. Chem J Chinese U 35, 1515–1522, doi: 10.7503/cjcu20140108 (2014). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Qu Y. S., Song Y. L., Huang C. P., Zhang J. & Chen B. H. Alkaline Ionic Liquids as Catalysts: A Novel and Green Process for the Dehydration of Carbohydrates To Give 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural. Ind Eng Chem Res 51, 13008–13013, doi: 10.1021/ie300140g (2012). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Qi X. H., Watanabe M., Aida T. M. & Smith R. L. Efficient process for conversion of fructose to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural with ionic liquids. Green Chem 11, 1327–1331, doi: 10.1039/b905975j (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Eminov S., Wilton-Ely J. D. E. T. & Hallett J. P. Highly Selective and Near-Quantitative Conversion of Fructose to 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural Using Mildly Acidic Ionic Liquids. Acs Sustain Chem Eng 2, 978–981, doi: 10.1021/sc400553q (2014). [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES