Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 May 17;6:26148. doi: 10.1038/srep26148

Differential contributions of subregions of medial temporal lobe to memory system in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: insights from fMRI study

Jiu Chen 1,*, Xujun Duan 2,*, Hao Shu 1, Zan Wang 1, Zhiliang Long 2, Duan Liu 1, Wenxiang Liao 1, Yongmei Shi 1, Huafu Chen 2, Zhijun Zhang 1,3,b
PMCID: PMC4868964  PMID: 27184985

Abstract

Altered function of the medial temporal lobe (MTL) is a valuable indicator of conversion from amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) to Alzheimer’s disease. This study is to delineate the functional circuitry of multiple subdivisions of parahippocampal gyrus and hippocampus (HIP) and to examine how this knowledge contributes to a more principled understanding of the contributions of its subregions to memory in aMCI. The functional connectivity (FC) analysis was performed in 85 aMCI and 129 healthy controls. The aMCI demonstrated the distinct disruptive patterns of the MTL subregional connectivity with the whole-brain. The right entorhinal cortex (ERC) and perirhinal cortex (PRC) showed increased connectivity with the left inferior and middle occipital gyrus, respectively, which potentially indicated a compensatory mechanism. Furthermore, the right altered MTL subregional FC was associated with episodic memory performance in aMCI. These results provide novel insights into the heterogeneous nature of its large-scale connectivity in MTL subregions in memory system underlying the memory deficits in aMCI. It further suggests that altered FC of MTL subregions is associated with the impairment of the differential encoding stages of memories and the functional changes in the specific right HIP-ERC-PRC-temporal circuitry may contribute to the impairment of episodic memory in aMCI.


Amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), which is characterized by the impairment of episodic memory, is a high rate of conversion to Alzheimer’s disease (AD)1,2. In humans, monkeys, and rats, the memory system of medial temporal lobe (MTL) is essential to declarative memory processes underlying remembrance for new events and facts3. The MTL is not only one of the earliest brain regions to present with pathology that leads to memory impairment, a hallmark of AD, but its subregions have a selective topography of pathological involvement during early disease4. Therefore, it is critical to promote our understanding of abnormalities of the function of the MTL memory system early in the course of AD.

Growing evidence suggests a more differentiated picture, one of functional diversity in the MTL subregions5,6. The monkeys and rodents studies delineate that the perirhinal cortex (PRC) receives projections largely from inferior temporal cortex areas, and projects them to the lateral entorhinal cortex (ERC)7. Numerous animal lesions and human fMRI studies have indicated that the PRC is related to visual object recognition memory8,9. The parahippocampal cortex (PHC) receives projections from the lateral and posterior-medial parietal cortex, and projects them to the medial ERC7. Findings from primate and human functional imaging studies have demonstrated that PHC damage is associated with impaired recognition of spatial and navigational information10,11. Inputs into the ERC converge from the PRC and the PHC within the MTL12. Due to the afferent and intrinsic pattern of ERC connectivity, the anterolateral and posteromedial ERC are related to a relative segregation of object and spatial information processing, respectively13. Impairment of the entire human ERC is associated with episodic memory dysfunction14. Both the lateral and medial ERC projections converge into the HIP at the top of the MTL cortical processing hierarchy7,13. Evidence from animal and human studies indicates that the HIP in combination with the ERC, binds information across temporal and spatial intervals, eventually forming multi-componential semantic and episodic memories5,12. Moreover, several human studies have also shown different anatomical and functional connectivity (FC) of the MTL subregions15,16,17,18. Taken together, these observations suggest that while the entire network of highly interconnected subregions is involved in declarative memory formation, each subregion may be specialized to process a unique aspect of the event or concept19.

Recently, several neuroimaging evidences indicate that aMCI can be characterized by abnormalities in resting-state FC of MTL subregions20,21,22,23. However, these above-mentioned studies do not explore the full-scale information of whole brain, or manually draw regions of interest (ROIs), or only provide results in coarsely divided subregions of the HIP and a limited view of MTL circuitry. Furthermore, these studies are performed in a relatively small cohort, which may have influenced statistical power or sensitivity resulting in the identification of additional areas of abnormality to some degree. Nonetheless, converging findings suggest that the deficits of MCI-spectrum subjects seem to be associated with overall MTL subregions, which suggests that there can be the distinct disrupted large-scale organization and FC profiles of MTL subregions in aMCI. The distinct functions of these areas are thought to arise from differences in local circuit properties and their interactions with distributed brain areas24. However, very little is known about the distinct disrupted functional organization and FC of the MTL subregional networks at the whole-brain level in aMCI. Therefore, measures of MTL function, such as FC, obtained within specific subregions of MTL may potentially be more sensitive to early disease stages.

The objective of the present study was therefore to investigate the large-scale functional organization and functional circuitry of MTL subregional networks in aMCI. We hypothesized that aMCI would present differentially abnormal connectivity patterns in the MTL subregional networks compared to healthy controls (HC). And we further predicted that the altered FC in a specific pathway along the MTL cortical processing hierarchy system would link to the impairment of episodic memory in aMCI. To answer this issue, the present study evaluated the connectivity patterns based on two parallel arrays of seeds along the longitudinal axis of the parahippocampal gyrus (PHG) and the HIP in each hemisphere (Fig. 1A,B for detailed data analysis pipeline).

Figure 1. Seven seed regions of interest in the left hemisphere and schematic of data analysis pipeline.

Figure 1

(A) A representative sagittal view of the brain depicts seven seed locations along the longitudinal axis of the hippocampus and the parahippocampal gyrus. Seeds were superimposed on a high-resolution T1-weighted brain template in stereotaxic Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space. (B) Schematic of data analysis pipeline. Regional mean fMRI time series were estimated by a custom T1 template, which was built by averaging the normalized anatomical images across all subjects. Gray matter volumes were also estimated for each of the same set of 14 MTL subregions used to parcellate the fMRI data. The general linear model analyses compared aMCI group to HC subjects on all neuroimaging markers; the multiple linear regression was used to examine relationships between the functional connectivity and cognitive performance scores; and the curve estimation was used to examine the relationships between increased functional connectivity and age in aMCI patients. Futhermore, schematic polar plots were quantitatively used to summarize overall functional connectivity patterns of each seed with target regions throughout the whole-brain. Abbreviations: aHIP, anterior hippocampus; mHIP, middle hippocampus; pHIP, posterior hippocampus; PRC, perirhinal cortex; ERC, entorhinal cortex; aPHC, anterior parahippocampal cortex; pPHC, posterior parahippocampal cortex; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MTL, medial temporal lobe; HC, healthy controls; aMCI, amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

Results

Demographic and neuropsychological characteristics

Demographic and neuropsychological characteristics are shown in Table 1. No significant differences in age, gender, or years of education were found between aMCI and HC (all p > 0.05). Compared with HC, aMCI showed significantly lower MMSE and MDRS scores, and significant deficits in performance in multiple-domains of cognitive functions, including episodic memory, information processing speed, executive function, and visuospatial cognition (all p < 0.05). Detailed raw scores and the corresponding Z scores from individual neuropsychological tests are provided in Table S1.

Table 1. Demographics and clinical measures of aMCI patients and healthy control subjects.

Items HC aMCI t values(χ2) pvalues
n = 129 n = 85
Age (years) 68.43(6.59) 69.48(7.52) −1.085 0.279
Gender (male/female) 64/65 46/39 0.416 0.519
Education level (years) 12.39(3.04) 11.84(3.22) 1.271 0.205
MMSE scores 28.22(1.43) 26.25(2.65) 7.035 0.000*
MDRS_2 137.92(3.57) 131.29(6.85) 9.252 0.000*
HAMD scores 1.63(2.39) 1.81(3.11) −0.481 0.631
Composite Z scores of each cognitive domain
 Episodic memory 0.50(0.50) −0.75(0.71) 15.266 0.000*
 information processing speed −0.12(0.35) 0.19(0.59) −4.78 0.000*
 Executive function 0.04(0.35) −0.07(0.36) 2.292 0.000*
 Visuospatial function 0.32(0.66) −0.04(0.35) 7.768 0.000*

Notes: Values are expressed as the mean (standard deviation, SD). Abbreviations: HC, healthy controls; aMCI, amnestic mild cognitive impairment; MMSE, Mini mental state exam; MDRS-2, Mattis Dementia Rating Scale-2; HAMD, Hamilton Depression Scale. *Significant differences are found between aMCI and HC subjects. P values are obtained by t test except for gender (chi square test). The performances of MMSE and MDRS-2 are presented as raw scores. The level of each cognitive domain is denoted by the composite Z scores. Raw scores and corresponding Z scores of individual neuropsychological tests are shown in Supplementary Table1.

Distinct functional connectivity networks of MTL subregions

FC patterns of each MTL subregion and correlation matrix within MTL subregions are shown in Figs S1–S3. Both in aMCI and HC, spontaneous activity in the MTL subregions strongly correlated with activities in a widely-distributed set of cortical and subcortical regions, as well as cerebellum (see details in SI Results). Furthermore, schematic polar plots illustrated that there were different FC patterns among four PHG and three HIP seeds, which showed similar patterns between aMCI and HC by visual inspection (see Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Heterogeneous functional connectivity associated with distinct parahippocampal and hippocampal seeds in HC and aMCI subjects ((A) left hemisphere seeds; (B) right hemisphere seeds). Schematic polar plot depicts connectivity patterns of four parahippocampal and three hippocampal seeds with target ROIs distributed across the whole brain. The concentric circles depict parameter estimates representing the connectivity strength. Note that the data of functional connectivity are extracted from the only brain regions corresponding to Fig. S1. Abbreviation: AMYG, amygdala; THA, thalamus; ACC, anterior cingulate gyrus; PUT, putamen; PCUN, precuneus; PCC, posterior cingulate cortex; LOG, inferior occipital gyrus; MOG, middle occipital gyrus; CAL, calcarine gyrus; CUN, cuneus; SFG, superior frontal gyrus; REG, rectus gyrus; ITG, inferior temporal gyrus; STG, superior temporal gyrus; MTG, middle temporal gyrus; CER, cerebelum.

Heterogeneous altered FC along anterior to posterior axis of PHG and HIP with target networks

As shown in Fig. 3, several regions showed abnormal connectivity in the MTL subregional networks in aMCI compared to HC. The detailed brain regions on distinct disrupted FC along the anterior to posterior axis of PHG and HIP are provided in Tables 2 and 3.

Figure 3. Resting-state functional connectivity patterns between group maps of the distinct MTL subregions.

Figure 3

(A) First column shows the subregions defined in MTL. (B) Last column shows the between-group statistical maps, with statistical threshold set at pcorrected < 0.01, corrected by AlphaSim. Warm and blue colors indicate decreased and increased functional connectivity in aMCI subjects compared to healthy controls. Color bar is presented with z score, respectively. (C) The spatial overlap in left (a) and right (b) parahippocampal and hippocampal seeds shows all brain regions of disrupted functional connectivity in aMCI subjects compared to healthy controls. The color bar (1–7 colors) indicates disrupted connectivity maps derived from each seed. Blue color shows these regions of increased functional connectivity in aMCI subjects compared to healthy controls. Notes: aHIP, anterior hippocampus; mHIP, middle hippocampus; pHIP, posterior hippocampus; PRC, perirhinal cortex; ERC, entorhinal cortex; aPHC, anterior parahippocampal cortex; pPHC, posterior parahippocampal cortex; L, the left MTL subregional networks; R, the right MTL subregional networks.

Table 2. Comparisons of functional connectivity of the parahippocampal seeds between aMCI patients and HC subjects.

Brain region Peak MNI coordinate
Peak Z value Cluster size (mm3)
x y z
The left PHG subregional networks
 (1) PRC (HC > aMCI)
  R Inferior temporal gyrus 52 2 −32 2.89 723
 (2) ERC (HC > aMCI)
  L Cerebelum_4_5 −8 −56 −2 3.31 752
  R Cerebelum_4_5 10 −52 −4 3.92 721
 (3) aPHC (HC > aMCI)
  R Middle temporal gyrus 52 2 −26 3.67 1336
 (4) pPHC (HC > aMCI)
  L Inferior temporal gyrus −62 −36 −14 3.30 960
  L Middle temporal gyrus −66 −30 −12 3.43 1560
  R Middle temporal gyrus 48 2 −30 3.60 1364
The right PHG subregional networks
 (1) PRC (HC > aMCI)
  R Hippocampus 20 −32 2 4.43 792
  R Inferior temporal gyrus 52 −4 −36 3.62 984
  L Thalamus −14 −34 2 3.57 624
(HC < aMCI)
  L Middle occipital gyrus −34 −78 26 −3.40 636
 (2) ERC (HC > aMCI)
  R Hippocampus 28 −30 −6 3.22 684
(HC < aMCI)
  L Inferior occipital gyrus −44 −66 −6 −3.37 682
 (3) aPHC (HC > aMCI)
  none          
 (4) pPHC (HC > aMCI)
  R Angular gyrus 42 −64 36 3.66 680
  L Cuneus −20 −58 26 3.90 616
  L Precuneus 0 −64 28 3.09 776
  R Precuneus 10 −50 34 3.16 1744
  R Middle temporal gyrus 60 −32 −8 3.41 784

Abbreviations: HC, healthy controls; aMCI, amnestic mild cognitive impairment; PRC, anterior perirhinal cortex; ERC, entorhinal cortex; aPHC, anterior parahippocampal cortex; pPHC, posterior parahippocampal cortex.

Table 3. Comparisons of functional connectivity of the hippocampus subregional seeds between aMCI patients and HC subjects.

Brain region Peak MNI coordinate
Peak Z value Cluster size (mm3)
x y z
The left HIP subregional networks
 (1) aHIP (HC > aMCI)
  none          
 (2) mHIP (HC > aMCI)
  R Precuneus 16 −50 14 3.23 800
  R Middle temporal gyrus 60 4 −30 3.80 1336
 (3) pHIP (HC > aMCI)
  none          
The right HIP subregional networks
 (1) aHIP (HC > aMCI)
  R Fusiform gyrus 38 −52 −14 3.79 872
 (2) mHIP (HC > aMCI)
  R Cerebelum_4_5 24 −40 −24 3.62 1720
  R Fusiform gyrus 24 −40 −16 3.75 1456
 (3) pHIP (HC > aMCI)
  R Fusiform gyrus 30 −2 −40 3.29 744

Abbreviations: HC, healthy controls; aMCI, amnestic mild cognitive impairment; aHIP, anterior hippocampus; mHIP, middle hippocampus; pHIP, posterior hippocampus.

In the MTL subregional networks, aMCI demonstrated the distinct disrupted FC with the cortical and subcortical regions. aMCI showed a trend toward decreased FC with fusiform gyrus, precuneus, cuneus, angular gyrus, thalamus, temporal lobe, and cerebellum. Interestingly, in the right ERC and PRC networks, aMCI showed increased FC with the left occipital gyrus (see Fig. 3, and Tables 2 and 3).

These disrupted FC maps in aMCI compared to HC were superimposed to illustrate their overlap in PHG and HIP seeds. No overlapping regions of altered FC were found in different MTL subregional networks (see Fig. 3).

Behavioral significance of the disrupted functional connectivity of MTL subregional networks

The multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that the mean altered FC strength between right ERC and HIP, between right PRC and HIP, and between right PRC and ITG closely correlated with episodic memory composite Z score in aMCI (see Fig. 4A,B). Additionally, no correlations were evident with respect to other cognitive functions in aMCI. However, no significant correlations were found between the FC values in the same regions with cognitive performance in HC.

Figure 4. Behavioral significance of disrupted MTL network connectivity in aMCI patients.

Figure 4

(A) Schematic plot indicates the relationships between increased and decreased functional connectivity in aMCI patients compared to healthy controls. Blue color shows increased functional connectivity, and red color shows decreased functional connectivity. (B) Scattergrams represent he correlations between clinical variables and resting-state FC of MTL subregions in aMCI patients. (C) The reverse u-shaped curve depicts the relationship between age and mean Z values of increased functional connectivity in aMCI patients compared to healthy controls. Abbreviations: FC, functional connectivity; EM, episodic memory; ITG, inferior temporal gyrus; IOG, inferior occipital gyrus; MOG, middle occipital gyrus; HIP, hippocampus; PRC, perirhinal cortex; ERC, entorhinal cortex; L, left; R, right.

Independent associations between the aging process and increased FC in aMCI

The curve estimation demonstrated that the relationships between the mean increased FC strength (mean FC between right ERC and left LOG, and right PRC and left MOG) and age were quadratic, namely inverse U-shaped curve in aMCI (see Fig. 4A,C). Furthermore, the peak of the curves was estimated to locate at around 70 years old. However, the age-related resting patterns were not found in HC.

Discussion

The present study identified a distinct altered FC pattern associated with cognitive impairment and a selective topography of functional changes in the MTL subregional networks, indicated that the disruption of the right HIP–ERC–PRC–temporal pathway was responsible for the impairment of episodic memory, and provided new insights to understand the pathophysiology underlying the memory deficits in aMCI.

Different FC patterns of the MTL subregions

The present study indicated that the MTL subregions showed different patterns of connectivity with cortical and subcortical areas, which corroborated and extended findings of functional heterogeneity along the longitudinal axis of the HIP and PHG in both animals19,25 and humans18,26. And these findings underlined key aspects of functional heterogeneity within the human MTL17,18,27,28,29, which suggests that each MTL subregion performs different specific functions linked to different forms of memory-guided behavior, respectively5,6,19,25.

Altered functional connectivity of MTL subregions in aMCI compared to HC

Our results showed that there were differentially abnormal connectivity patterns along the anterior to posterior axis of PHG and HIP and the asymmetry of damaged degree between left and right hemispheres in aMCI compared to HC (see Figs 2A,B and 3C, Fig. S1). Our findings suggest that MTL subregions may have a selective topography of pathological involvement in aMCI23,30,31,32.

Based on our findings, as well as these findings from structural connectivity, as indicated by tract-tracing in animals7,13 and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in humans16,33, FC17,18, and task-sate fMRI studies5,7, we propose the following speculative model (see Fig. 5) to explain how altered connectivity patterns of MTL subregions contribute to a more principled understanding of the contributions of its subregions to memory in aMCI. As shown in Fig. 5, the schematic drawing represents the information processing that the MTL memory system processes perception information into memory24,34. This system clearly shows that two neuropathways are needed to complete the formation of memory: occipito-temporal visual object processing pathway (the “what” stream)7,25 and parieto-temporal visuospatial pathway (the “where” stream)35,36. In addition, numerous studies on the functional organization of the MTL also focus on relative differences between dorsal and ventral stream visual inputs from two distinct neocortical networks5,7,17,18,37,38,39,40.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Schematic drawing of medial temporal lobe (A) plus the components of the medial temporal lobe memory system believed to be important in the transition from perception to memory (B). The networks in cortex show representations of occipito-temporal visual object processing pathway (the “what” stream) and parieto- temporal visuospatial pathway (the “where” stream) for the formation of memory. Red circle and arrow complex representing disconnected neural pathway associated the disruption of episodic memory in the aMCI patients. Blue circle and arrow complex representing compensated neural pathway in the aMCI patients.

As shown in Fig. 4, the present study indicated that the PRC network in aMCI exhibited mainly decreased connectivity with the right inferior temporal gyrus. Evidence from primate and human neuroimaging studies has indicated that these connectivities exactly locate in the occipito-temporal visual object processing pathway of two parallel pathways within the MTL memory system7,17,18. The inferior temporal lobe has been considered as a connectional “hub” linking sensory information about the meaning of words, objects, facts and the hippocampus via PRC17. It has been established that the PRC represents the apex of this pathway, which is responsible for complex integration of visual object features19. In line with this connectivity pattern, numerous animal lesions and human fMRI studies have demonstrated that the PRC plays a key role in multimodal object memory25, visual object recognition memory41, and semantic object memories7,19. Although the PRC network in aMCI exhibited increased connectivity with the left middle occipital gyrus, it suggests a maladaptive and/or pathogenic mechanism, which may reflect an unsuccessful attempt to recruit preserved neuronal areas to compensate for pathology, as well as an imbalance between inhibition and excitation in impaired networks owe to impending pathological processes42,43. Taken together, these findings further suggest that the aMCI may present an impairment on the formation of visual and multimodal memories of meaningful objects, that is, semantic object memories7,19.

Our results showed that the pPHC network in aMCI exhibited decreased connectivity with parietal lobe (cuneus, precuneus, and angular gyrus) and middle temporal gyrus, which locate in the parieto-temporal visuospatial pathway35,36. It has been established that PHC connected with a posterior cortical network17,18, and the PHC, retrosplenial, and medial and ventral parietal cortices correspond to a cortical network that is interconnected via the cingulum bundle33. It has been reported that the PHG is thought to be the primary DMN node in the MTL that mediates the FC between the DMN and MTL subregions involved in the formation of memory44. We also found that decreased FC to the pPHC network was involved in the DMN regions in aMCI patients. Numerous studies have supported that Aβ deposition first occurs within the DMN in aMCI patients45,46 and is associated with impaired resting state connectivity47,48. The present study provides further evidence for the disconnection of the DMN in aMCI49,50, which is especially associated with the pPHC network. And notably, the aPHC network in aMCI only showed reduced connectivity with middle temporal gyrus, which suggests that aPHC and pPHC may be two distinct subregions within the MTL17. Indeed, previous fMRI studies have also observed that posterior parts of the bilateral PHC more process both perceptual and mnemonic features of scenes, that is, the visuospatial arrangement of landmarks, which enable orientation and navigation in the environment19,51. Therefore, these findings may be partially responsible for the unable orientation and navigation in the environment, a key clinical symptom in late stages of disease progression of aMCI.

The present study showed that the ERC network mainly exhibited decreased connectivity with hippocampus and cerebellum. Numerous nonhuman primate studies have demonstrated that the PRC and PHC provide nearly two-thirds of the cortical input to the ERC. The anterolateral aspects of the ERC receive highly integrated visual object information from occipito-temporal visual object processing pathway via the PRC7,35, whereas the posteromedial aspects of the ERC receive visuospatial information primarily from the parieto-medial temporal visuospatial pathway via the PHC36. Focusing on the electrophysiological properties of neurons, numerous studies have indicated that the ERC neurons may provide key information about how episodic memories are formed in downstream hippocampus52,53. Therefore, evidences from previous studies as well as our findings suggest that the disconnection of the ERC and HIP is associated with episodic memory dysfunction54,55. Furthermore, it is interesting to note that the disconnection of the ERC and HIP accompanied with the disconnection of ERC and cerebellum, which is line with our previous studies that cerebellum deficits in aMCI were associated with the changes in the hippocampus56, suggesting the cerebellum deficits in aMCI may have physiological meaning57,58. It is consistently suggested that the impairment on structural and functional levels in the cerebellum in elderly aMCI may be related to cognitive dysfunction. Therefore, this result adds to our understanding of cerebellum by noting that this area is likely to be a connectional “hub” to the hippocampus by way of the ERC.

Our findings complement findings of functional heterogeneity along the longitudinal axis of the HIP in both animals and humans. The present study showed the decreased connectivities between right aHIP and visual cortex (right fusiform gyrus), between mHIP and parietal cortex (precuneus), middle temporal gyrus, cerebellum, and visual cortex, between right pHIP and visual cortex in aMCI. These results suggest that aMCI present differentially abnormal connectivity patterns along the anterior to posterior axis of HIP. The previous studies have indicated that the fusiform gyrus, which is located on the ventromedial surface of the temporal and occipital lobes59, is a key structure involved in facial cognition60,61,62. aMCI patients showed altered FC of the fusiform gyrus61 and widespread changes in fusiform connectivity during the performance of a face-matching task60. Previous studies have reported that the anterior hippocampus may be preferentially involved in memory for faces63. Therefore, our findings suggest that aMCI subjects present visual facial cognition deficits64, which is associated with early clinical symptom of aMCI. The reduced connectivity between fusiform gyrus and HIP may be due to the presence of cholinergic lesions in aMCI65; specifically, it has been reported that cholinergic deficits exist in the primary visual cortex in mild AD66. In this context, reduction connectivity between the precuneus and HIP is particularly noteworthy, since the precuneus plays a key role in how intrinsic activity is mediated throughout the DMN67. Previous studies have also reported a precuneus connectivity reduction in the DMN49,50,68 and reduced FC between the precuneus and the MTL in aMCI20, which is a potentially valuable indicator of conversion from aMCI to AD.

Behavioral significance of the altered functional connectivity of MTL

The relationship between the decreased FC and the neuropsychological performance supported the notion that the disrupted functional neurocircuitry was the basis of cognitive impairment in aMCI (Fig. 4), suggesting that the functional changes of the right HIP-ERC-PRC-temporal pathway lead to the impairment of episodic memory. Several studies demonstrate that the HIP binds multisensory object and spatial, contextual, and associational information together to represent our semantic and episodic memories19,69. These memories bind both spatial or context information from the dorsal stream, transmitted via PHC–ERC connections36, together with object information received via PRC–ERC connections35. Taken together, these results indicate that the disruption of the occipito-temporal visual object processing pathway may contribute to the impairment of episodic memory in aMCI7,25.

Potential significance of the relationships between the aging process and increased functional connectivity in aMCI

Interestingly, the present study demonstrated that the relationships between the increased FC strength and age were quadratic, namely reverse U-shaped curve (Fig. 4A,C). This finding is consistent with models of brain compensation and plasticity in ageing, suggesting that the brains of MCI remain highly plastic and interventions can be provide to promote brain plasticity70. Our results suggest that there may be a phase of increased FC in MTL at the clinical stage of aMCI, that is, with the aging process, the MTL connectivity may lose some compensation and add some more disruption due to the pathological changes. Furthermore, the peak of the inverse U-shaped curve was estimated to locate at around 70 years old, consistent with a series of findings demonstrating that the compensatory mechanism in aMCI may play the greatest role at their 70s when gradually starts to collapse over 70s. The upgoing phase of the curve before 70s represents minimal pathological stage while the downgoing phase over 70s indicates the gradual destruction of compensatory mechanism related to pathological progression in aMCI71. Therefore, this finding also indicate that care must be taken to use rs-fMRI on an individual basis as a physiologic imaging biomarker for diagnostic attempts, depending on the disease stage. Future studies should focus on the relationship between this U-shaped functional curve and other anatomical (e.g. atrophy) or metabolic (e.g. Aβ deposition) markers. Further, a combination of clinical (e.g., MMSE scores), neuropsychologic (e.g., memory tasks), anatomic, and metabolic measures may be used to assist in the determination of where an individual is along the inverse U-shaped functional curve of MTL.

Limitations

The resting data of this study were smoothed with a Gaussian kernel of 4 × 4 × 4 mm3, so each ROI would have included mixed signals from adjacent regions. To assess the effect degree of the resting connectivity patterns by the choice of smoothing, we compared the differences of these results from the different smoothing sizes (e.g. 2 × 2 × 2 mm3, 4 × 4 × 4 mm3, and 6 × 6 × 6 mm3) and no significant differences were found.

Conclusion

The current study provides novel insights into the heterogeneous nature of its large-scale connectivity in MTL subregions underlying the memory deficits in aMCI. It further suggests that the functional changes in the right HIP-ERC-PRC-temporal circuitry may be an early indicator for early stage changes and progression of this disease.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

This study was approved by the responsible Human Participants Ethics Committee of the Affiliated ZhongDa Hospital, Southeast University. All participants were assessed at the Affiliated ZhongDa Hospital, Southeast University, and written informed consent was obtained from all of the participants and the methods were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines.

Participants

The present study initially recruited 222 elderly individuals (all of whom were Chinese Han and right-handed), including 87 aMCI, and 135 HC, through normal community health screening, newspaper advertisement, and hospital outpatient service. Due to motion artifacts, of these, 6 HC subjects and 2 aMCI subjects were excluded. The remaining 129 HC and 85 aMCI subjects were eligible and entered further analysis. The inclusion and exclusion criteria (see details in SI Methods) used to choose subjects can be found in our previously published studies56.

Neuropsychological assessments

All subjects underwent a standardized clinical interview and comprehensive neuropsychological assessments that were performed by neuropsychologists (Dr. Shu, Wang, and Liu). The details regarding the neuropsychological assessments are provided in SI Methods.

MRI data acquisition

MRI images were acquired using a 3.0 Tesla Trio Siemens scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with a 12-channel head-coil at ZhongDa Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University. Details on image acquisition parameters are provided in SI Methods.

Image preprocessing

Data analyses were conducted with Matlab (Math Works Inc., Natick, MA, USA) and SPM8 (available at: http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm). Briefly, this preprocessing included removal of the first ten volumes, slice timing correction and head motion correction72,73. To spatially normalize the rs-fcMRI data, the T1-weighted images were used to register the functional data to their corresponding anatomical image, and the resulting aligned T1 dataset was transformed into Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space74. To improve the coregistration of the rs-fcMRI data, a custom T1 template was built by averaging the normalized anatomical images across all subjects75. Finally, the normalized functional images were created by applying the transformation of the T1 images to the customized T1 template. Notably, such a custom template-based registration procedure could reduce the inaccuracy of the spatial normalization of functional volumes due to GM atrophy in aMCI and HC. Functional images were resampled to 2 × 2 × 2 mm3 voxels and spatially smoothed using a 4-mm full-width half-maximum (FWHM) Gaussian kernel. Linear detrending and temporal band-pass filtering (0.01–0.08 Hz) were applied to reduce the effect of low-frequency drifts and high-frequency physiological noise. Finally, several nuisance variables, including six head motion parameters, global mean signal76,77, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and WM signal were removed by multiple linear regression analysis.

Quality assurance (QA)

Assessment of susceptibility artifacts

Previous studies have indicated that brain areas in the MTL directly above the petrous bone especially tend to signal loss17,78. To assess the effects of susceptibility artifacts in our data, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was computed for each voxel by averaging the signal intensity across all the target-atlas normalized BOLD runs and dividing it by the SD over time79. To avoid variability in EPI timeseries cause of susceptibility artifact, all ROIs were thresholded to exclude voxels with mean signal in the intensity-normalized EPI timeseries below 3000, corresponding approximately to a SNR of 2018,80. Thresholds resulted in the rejection of no more than 5% of voxels in any ROI. Then these thresholded ROIs were further used to perform FC analyses.

Gray matter loss effect

As numerous studies have indicated significant GM atrophy in aMCI56,81, these differences on FCs of the MTL subregions in our study might be driven by the anatomical differences between groups. To clarify this issue, we performed the general linear model (GLM) analysis to examine the between-group differences on the FCs for each MTL subregion with GM volume as an additional covariate30,82. Briefly, the resultant GM volume map of each individual was first estimated from the normalized T1 images using Voxel-Based Morphometry (VBM8 toolbox, http://dbm.neuro.uni-jena.de/vbm). Then, a two-sample t test was performed to determine whether the GM was atrophied in aMCI (Fig. S4), controlling for age, gender, and years of education. Details on VBM analysis are provided in SI Methods.

Head motion effect

To minimize the influence of head motion both at the individual and at the group levels, three approaches were employed in QA measures. First, the head motion effects were regressed out, which were calculated as the root mean squared (rms) head displacement or rotation (in mm or °) derived from the motion-correction procedure76. Second, a ‘scrubbing’ procedure was carried out to scrub frames (volumes) with excessively high whole-brain rms signal change over time in the preprocessed rs-fcMRI data for each individual47,72,73. We discarded a fraction of <7% in each group (no significant differences on fraction of frames removed were found). Overall, 2 HC and 2 aMCI had a large proportion of high-noise frames (>20% frames identified as contaminated) and were therefore excluded from the analysis. Third, additional QA measures included rms head displacement or rotation (in mm or °) and the voxel-wise time series standard deviation (SD) averaged over the whole brain73,83. We referred to a prior study84 to empirically determine the exclusion criteria for QA measure with the objective of achieving QA parameter distribution equivalence between groups while maximizing the number of included subjects. Overall, 4 HC subjects with a mean preprocessed rs-fcMRI signal 2.5% SD (after nuisance regression) or rms movement or rotation exceeding 1.5 mm or 1.5° and mean frame-to-frame rms movement or rotation more than 0.15 mm or 0.1° were also excluded. The QA parameters before and after the removal of contaminated frames are shown in Table S2. No significant differences between groups were observed in QA parameters (Table S2).

Definition of MTL seed ROIs

This study created two parallel arrays of four-millimeter spherical seeds along the longitudinal axis of the PHG and HIP respectively (Fig. 1A). Specifically, the four seeds appropriately located at the PRC (i.e. PRC), the transition area of ERC and posterior PRC region (i.e. ERC), the anterior and posterior PHC (i.e. aPHC, pPHC). Moreover, three other seeds appropriately located at the head (anterior), body (middle) and tail (posterior) of the HIP (i.e. aHIP, mHIP, pHIP) (Table 4 for the details of MNI seed coordinates). The precise locations of these seeds were defined based on previous studies in animals and humans about distinct anatomical and functional profiles of MTL subdivisions11,17,18,19, and functional heterogeneity along the HIP axis85,86,87. All specific ROIs were created by drawing 4-mm spheres, of which central coordinates were determined and defined in the MNI stereotaxic space according to the well-established MNI seed coordinates that originally represented the MTL subdivisions as described in previously published studies11,17,18,26,88 (Table 4 for the details of MNI seed coordinates). To ensure the accuracy and correspondence of those ROIs across different subjects, all ROIs were used to extract an averaged hemodynamic timeseries for each location, and for each subject, by applying each ROI mask to the preprocessed timeseries, and averaging across all voxels within the ROI.

Table 4. Regions, MNI coordinates, and sample of references supporting choice of seven seed regions of interest.
ROI MNI coordinates
Functional references Anatomical references
x y z
PRC (±) 26 −4 −36 Kahn et al.17; Libby et al.18; Lacy and Stark26 Colombo et al.85; Maguire et al.86; Strange and Dolan 2006; Poppenk and Moscovitch87; Staresina et al.11; Kivisaari et al.19
ERC (±) 26 −16 −28 Kahn et al. 17; Lacy and Stark26  
aPHC (±) 26 −30 −20 Kahn et al.17; Libby et al.18; Lacy and Stark26  
pPHC (±) 26 −40 −12 Kahn et al.17; Libby et al.18; Lacy and Stark26  
aHIP (±) 24 −14 −20 Kahn et al.17; Libby et al.18; Lacy and Stark26; Yassa et al.88  
mHIP (±) 26 −26 −12 Kahn et al.17; Lacy and Stark26; Yassa et al.88  
pHIP (±) 26 −34 −4 Kahn et al.17; Libby et al.18; Lacy and Stark26; Yassa et al.88  

References included contain ROIs that are within the expanded seed ROIs used in this study. Abbreviations: PRC, anterior perirhinal cortex; ERC/pPRC, posterior perirhinal cortex proximate to entorhinal cortex; aPHC, anterior parahippocampal cortex; pPHC, posterior parahippocampal cortex; aHIP, anterior hippocampus; mHIP, middle hippocampus; pHIP, posterior hippocampus. Coordinates for seeds in the right and left hemispheres are defined in the MNI stereotaxic space.

Functional connectivity analyses

The average time courses for all voxels within each MTL subregion were extracted as the reference time course, separately, and voxelwise cross-correlation analysis was then carried out between the averaged time courses of all voxels within the seed region and the whole brain within the GM mask. The GM mask was created by thresholding (a probability threshold of 0.2) the GM probability map obtained from all subjects in this study. A Fisher’s z-transform was then applied to improve the normality of the correlation coefficients.

Statistical analysis

Demographic and neuropsychological data

The statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The two-independent samples t test and chi-square tests (applied only in the comparisons according to gender) were used to test the differences in demographic data and neuropsychological performances between aMCI and HC (p < 0.05).

Group-level intrinsic connectivity analysis

To highlight the FC patterns of MTL subregions at a group level, the spatial maps of FC in each group were submitted to a random-effect analysis using one-sample t-tests with a stringently threshold of p < 0.01 using family-wise error (FWE) correction together with a cluster extent k > 100 voxels (800 mm3) to reveal regions most robustly correlated with each seed. Only clusters within the GM mask were retained. To avoid ambiguous biological interpretations related to apparently negative connectivity resulting from correction for global signal changes77, only positive FC was used in this study.

To assess the between-group differences of the FCs of each MTL subregion, we used GLM analysis (“FCs” as dependent variable, “group” as independent variable) with age, gender, years of education, and GM volume treated as covariates. A statistical threshold of p (uncorrected) <0.005 and cluster extent k > 80 voxels (640 mm3) was used to achieve a corrected statistical significance of p < 0.05, determined by Monte-Carlo simulation (see program AlphaSim by D. Ward).

To assess the potential overlap between the between-group difference connectivity maps derived from the seven seeds of interest, these between-group difference maps from GLM analysis were thresholded as indicated above, binarized and summed, generating a so-called “overlapping” map.

To characterize abnormal FC patterns of MTL seeds to specific target brain ROIs, schematic polar plots were used to describe FC patterns of each seed with target regions throughout the whole-brain. Details on definition of target ROIs are provided in SI Methods. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test the difference of FC patterns of MTL seeds between aMCI and HC (p < 0.05).

Correlations between the altered MTL subregional connectivity and neuropsychological performance

To assess the links between altered FC and neuropsychological performance, we extracted the averaged FC strengths of the regions showing altered MTL subregional connectivity. The multiple linear regression model analysis was used to examine the relationships between the extracted FC strengths and the neuropsychological performance in each group. To increase statistical power by reducing random variability, as previously described82,89, we composited the neuropsychological tests into 4 cognitive domains and transformed the raw scores into 4 composite Z scores (see details in SI Methods) (p < 0.05, Bonferroni-corrected).

Independent associations between the aging process and increased FC

To investigate the links between the age and increased FC in the whole-brain in aMCI due to HC, the curve estimation was used to examine the relationships between FC strength (mean Z values of increased FC in the whole-brain) and age in each group (p < 0.05, Bonferroni-corrected).

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Chen, J. et al. Differential contributions of subregions of medial temporal lobe to memory system in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: insights from fMRI study. Sci. Rep. 6, 26148; doi: 10.1038/srep26148 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep26148-s1.pdf (1.3MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81420108012; 91432000; 81171021; 91132727; 61125304; 81500919), the Key Program for Clinical Medicine and Science and Technology: Jiangsu Province Clinical Medical Research Center (No. BL2013025; BL2014077), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and the Scientific Research Innovation Program for College and University Graduates of Jiangsu Province (No. KYZZ15_0063), and the Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Southeast University (No. YBJJ1538).

Footnotes

Author Contributions J.C., H.S., Z.W., D.L., W.L. and Y.S. collected the data. J.C., X.D. and Z.L. analyzed data and performed the measurements. J.C. and X.D. had the major responsibility for preparing the paper (including SI). J.C. wrote part of the paper. H.C. and Z.Z. supervised the project.

References

  1. Petersen R. C. et al. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol 56, 303–308 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Petersen R. C. & Negash S. Mild cognitive impairment: an overview. CNS Spectr 13, 45–53 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Scoville W. B. & Milner B. Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 20, 11–21 (1957). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Braak H. & Braak E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol 82, 239–259 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Davachi L. Item, context and relational episodic encoding in humans. Curr Opin Neurobiol 16, 693–700 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Westerberg C. et al. Distinct medial temporal contributions to different forms of recognition in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychologia 51, 2450–2461 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eichenbaum H., Yonelinas A. P. & Ranganath C. The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. Annu Rev Neurosci 30, 123–152 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Meunier M., Bachevalier J., Mishkin M. & Murray E. A. Effects on visual recognition of combined and separate ablations of the entorhinal and perirhinal cortex in rhesus monkeys. J Neurosci 13, 5418–5432 (1993). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Taylor K. I., Stamatakis E. A. & Tyler L. K. Crossmodal integration of object features: voxel-based correlations in brain-damaged patients. Brain 132, 671–683 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Alvarado M. C. & Bachevalier J. Comparison of the effects of damage to the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex on transverse patterning and location memory in rhesus macaques. J Neurosci 25, 1599–1609 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Staresina B. P., Duncan K. D. & Davachi L. Perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices differentially contribute to later recollection of object- and scene-related event details. J Neurosci 31, 8739–8747 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Burgess N., Maguire E. A. & O’Keefe J. The human hippocampus and spatial and episodic memory. Neuron 35, 625–641 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. van Strien N. M., Cappaert N. L. & Witter M. P. The anatomy of memory: an interactive overview of the parahippocampal-hippocampal network. Nat Rev Neurosci 10, 272–282 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Di Paola M. et al. Episodic memory impairment in patients with Alzheimer’s disease is correlated with entorhinal cortex atrophy. A voxel-based morphometry study. J Neurol 254, 774–781 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Powell H. W. et al. Noninvasive in vivo demonstration of the connections of the human parahippocampal gyrus. Neuroimage 22, 740–747 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zeineh M. M., Holdsworth S., Skare S., Atlas S. W. & Bammer R. Ultra-high resolution diffusion tensor imaging of the microscopic pathways of the medial temporal lobe. Neuroimage 62, 2065–2082 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kahn I., Andrews-Hanna J. R., Vincent J. L., Snyder A. Z. & Buckner R. L. Distinct cortical anatomy linked to subregions of the medial temporal lobe revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol 100, 129–139 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Libby L. A., Ekstrom A. D., Ragland J. D. & Ranganath C. Differential connectivity of perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices within human hippocampal subregions revealed by high-resolution functional imaging. J Neurosci 32, 6550–6560 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kivisaari S. L., Probst A. & Taylor K. I. The Perirhinal, Entorhinal, and Parahippocampal Cortices and Hippocampus: An Overview of Functional Anatomy and Protocol for Their Segmentation in MR Images. (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013). [Google Scholar]
  20. Sorg C. et al. Selective changes of resting-state networks in individuals at risk for Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104, 18760–18765 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang L. et al. Changes in hippocampal connectivity in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease: evidence from resting state fMRI. Neuroimage 31, 496–504 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Bai F. et al. Aberrant hippocampal subregion networks associated with the classifications of aMCI subjects: a longitudinal resting-state study. PLos One 6, e29288 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Das S. R. et al. Increased functional connectivity within medial temporal lobe in mild cognitive impairment. Hippocampus 23, 1–6 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Squire L. R., Stark C. E. & Clark R. E. The medial temporal lobe. Annu Rev Neurosci 27, 279–306 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lavenex P., Suzuki W. A. & Amaral D. G. Perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices of the macaque monkey: Intrinsic projections and interconnections. J Comp Neurol 472, 371–394 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lacy J. W. & Stark C. E. Intrinsic functional connectivity of the human medial temporal lobe suggests a distinction between adjacent MTL cortices and hippocampus. Hippocampus 22, 2290–2302 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lavenex P. & Amaral D. G. Hippocampal-neocortical interaction: a hierarchy of associativity. Hippocampus 10, 420–430 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pihlajamaki M. et al. Visual presentation of novel objects and new spatial arrangements of objects differentially activates the medial temporal lobe subareas in humans. Eur J Neurosci 19, 1939–1949 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kivisaari S. L., Tyler L. K., Monsch A. U. & Taylor K. I. Medial perirhinal cortex disambiguates confusable objects. Brain 135, 3757–3769 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Bai F. et al. Abnormal functional connectivity of hippocampus during episodic memory retrieval processing network in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Biol Psychiatry 65, 951–958 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Chen J., Zhang Z. & Li S. Can multi-modal neuroimaging evidence from hippocampus provide biomarkers for the progression of amnestic mild cognitive impairment? Neurosci Bull 31, 128–140 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Buckner R. L. et al. Molecular, structural, and functional characterization of Alzheimer’s disease: evidence for a relationship between default activity, amyloid, and memory. J Neurosci 25, 7709–7717 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kondo H., Saleem K. S. & Price J. L. Differential connections of the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex with the orbital and medial prefrontal networks in macaque monkeys. J Comp Neurol 493, 479–509 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Squire L. R. & Zola-Morgan S. The medial temporal lobe memory system. Science 253, 1380–1386 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Suzuki W. A. & Amaral D. G. Perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices of the macaque monkey: cortical afferents. J Comp Neurol 350, 497–533 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kravitz D. J., Saleem K. S., Baker C. I. & Mishkin M. A new neural framework for visuospatial processing. Nat Rev Neurosci 12, 217–230 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Diana R. A., Yonelinas A. P. & Ranganath C. Medial temporal lobe activity during source retrieval reflects information type, not memory strength. J Cogn Neurosci 22, 1808–1818 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Barense M. D., Henson R. N., Lee A. C. & Graham K. S. Medial temporal lobe activity during complex discrimination of faces, objects, and scenes: Effects of viewpoint. Hippocampus 20, 389–401 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Montaldi D. & Mayes A. R. The role of recollection and familiarity in the functional differentiation of the medial temporal lobes. Hippocampus 20, 1291–1314 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ranganath C. A unified framework for the functional organization of the medial temporal lobes and the phenomenology of episodic memory. Hippocampus 20, 1263–1290 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Barbeau E. et al. Evaluation of visual recognition memory in MCI patients. Neurology 62, 1317–1322 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Verstraete E. et al. Motor network degeneration in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a structural and functional connectivity study. PLos One 5, e13664 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Douaud G., Filippini N., Knight S., Talbot K. & Turner M. R. Integration of structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain 134, 3470–3479 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Ward A. M. et al. The parahippocampal gyrus links the default-mode cortical network with the medial temporal lobe memory system. Hum Brain Mapp 35, 1061–1073 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang L. et al. Cerebrospinal fluid Abeta42, phosphorylated Tau181, and resting-state functional connectivity. JAMA Neurol 70, 1242–1248 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Bero A. W. et al. Neuronal activity regulates the regional vulnerability to amyloid-beta deposition. Nat Neurosci 14, 750–756 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sheline Y. I. et al. Amyloid plaques disrupt resting state default mode network connectivity in cognitively normal elderly. Biol Psychiatry 67, 584–587 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Drzezga A. et al. Neuronal dysfunction and disconnection of cortical hubs in non-demented subjects with elevated amyloid burden. Brain 134, 1635–1646 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Greicius M. D., Srivastava G., Reiss A. L. & Menon V. Default-mode network activity distinguishes Alzheimer’s disease from healthy aging: evidence from functional MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101, 4637–4642 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Agosta F. et al. Resting state fMRI in Alzheimer’s disease: beyond the default mode network. Neurobiol Aging 33, 1564–1578 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Epstein R. & Kanwisher N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 392, 598–601 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Fyhn M., Hafting T., Treves A., Moser M. B. & Moser E. I. Hippocampal remapping and grid realignment in entorhinal cortex. Nature 446, 190–194 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Lipton P. A. & Eichenbaum H. Complementary roles of hippocampus and medial entorhinal cortex in episodic memory. Neural Plast 2008, 258467 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Coutureau E. & Di Scala G. Entorhinal cortex and cognition. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 33, 753–761 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Eustache F., Desgranges B., Giffard B., de la Sayette V. & Baron J. C. Entorhinal cortex disruption causes memory deficit in early Alzheimer’s disease as shown by PET. Neuroreport 12, 683–685 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Chen J. et al. The interaction of APOE genotype by age in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a voxel-based morphometric study. J Alzheimers Dis 43, 657–668 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Bai F. et al. Mapping the altered patterns of cerebellar resting-state function in longitudinal amnestic mild cognitive impairment patients. J Alzheimers Dis 23, 87–99 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Teipel S. J. et al. Regional networks underlying interhemispheric connectivity: an EEG and DTI study in healthy ageing and amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Hum Brain Mapp 30, 2098–2119 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Ishai A., Ungerleider L. G., Martin A. & Haxby J. V. The representation of objects in the human occipital and temporal cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 12 Suppl 2, 35–51 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Bokde A. L. et al. Functional connectivity of the fusiform gyrus during a face-matching task in subjects with mild cognitive impairment. Brain 129, 1113–1124 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Cai S. et al. Altered Functional Connectivity of Fusiform Gyrus in Subjects with Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Resting-State fMRI Study. Front Hum Neurosci 9, 471 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Gauthier I. et al. The fusiform “face area” is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level. J Cogn Neurosci 12, 495–504 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Lee A. C., Scahill V. L. & Graham K. S. Activating the medial temporal lobe during oddity judgment for faces and scenes. Cereb Cortex 18, 683–696 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Golby A. et al. Memory encoding in Alzheimer’s disease: an fMRI study of explicit and implicit memory. Brain 128, 773–787 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Mesulam M., Shaw P., Mash D. & Weintraub S. Cholinergic nucleus basalis tauopathy emerges early in the aging-MCI-AD continuum. Ann Neurol 55, 815–828 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Ikonomovic M. D., Mufson E. J., Wuu J., Bennett D. A. & DeKosky S. T. Reduction of choline acetyltransferase activity in primary visual cortex in mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Arch Neurol 62, 425–430 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Raichle M. E. et al. A default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 676–682 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Rombouts S. A., Barkhof F., Goekoop R., Stam C. J. & Scheltens P. Altered resting state networks in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer’s disease: an fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 26, 231–239 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Dolorfo C. L. & Amaral D. G. Entorhinal cortex of the rat: topographic organization of the cells of origin of the perforant path projection to the dentate gyrus. J Comp Neurol 398, 25–48 (1998). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Belleville S. et al. Training-related brain plasticity in subjects at risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 134, 1623–1634 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Dickerson B. C. & Sperling R. A. Functional abnormalities of the medial temporal lobe memory system in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: insights from functional MRI studies. Neuropsychologia 46, 1624–1635 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Power J. D., Barnes K. A., Snyder A. Z., Schlaggar B. L. & Petersen S. E. Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. Neuroimage 59, 2142–2154 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Van Dijk K. R., Sabuncu M. R. & Buckner R. L. The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity MRI. Neuroimage 59, 431–438 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Ashburner J. & Friston K. J. Unified segmentation. Neuroimage 26, 839–851 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Wang Z. et al. Differentially disrupted functional connectivity of the subregions of the inferior parietal lobule in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Struct Funct 220, 745–762 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Zuo X. N. et al. Growing together and growing apart: regional and sex differences in the lifespan developmental trajectories of functional homotopy. J Neurosci 30, 15034–15043 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Fox M. D., Zhang D., Snyder A. Z. & Raichle M. E. The global signal and observed anticorrelated resting state brain networks. J Neurophysiol 101, 3270–3283 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Ojemann J. G. et al. Anatomic localization and quantitative analysis of gradient refocused echo-planar fMRI susceptibility artifacts. Neuroimage 6, 156–167 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Murphy K., Bodurka J. & Bandettini P. A. How long to scan? The relationship between fMRI temporal signal to noise ratio and necessary scan duration. Neuroimage 34, 565–574 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Firbank M. J., Harrison R. M., Williams E. D. & Coulthard A. Quality assurance for MRI: practical experience. Br J Radiol 73, 376–383 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Apostolova L. G. et al. 3D comparison of hippocampal atrophy in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 129, 2867–2873 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Xie C. et al. Abnormal insula functional network is associated with episodic memory decline in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Neuroimage 63, 320–327 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. de Calignon A. et al. Propagation of tau pathology in a model of early Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 73, 685–697 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Brier M. R. et al. Loss of intranetwork and internetwork resting state functional connections with Alzheimer’s disease progression. J Neurosci 32, 8890–8899 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Colombo M., Fernandez T., Nakamura K. & Gross C. G. Functional differentiation along the anterior-posterior axis of the hippocampus in monkeys. J Neurophysiol 80, 1002–1005 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Maguire E. A. et al. Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97, 4398–4403 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Poppenk J. & Moscovitch M. A hippocampal marker of recollection memory ability among healthy young adults: contributions of posterior and anterior segments. Neuron 72, 931–937 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Yassa M. A., Mattfeld A. T., Stark S. M. & Stark C. E. Age-related memory deficits linked to circuit-specific disruptions in the hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 8873–8878 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Shu H. et al. Opposite Neural Trajectories of Apolipoprotein E 4 and 2 Alleles with Aging Associated with Different Risks of Alzheimer’s Disease. Cereb Cortex 26, 1421–1429 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep26148-s1.pdf (1.3MB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES