Erratum
After publication of the original article [1], it came to the authors’ attention that there were some errors affecting Tables 1 and 3. These errors do not affect the scientific conclusion of the study presented in the original article.
Table 1.
Variables | Trauma (n = 16) | Non-trauma (n = 9) | Total (n = 25) |
---|---|---|---|
Age (y), median (IQR) | 72 (39–82) | 69 (63–72) | 69 (45–80) |
Male, n (%) | 6 (38) | 9 (100)* | 15 (75) |
Shock index, median (IQR) | 1.4 (1.1 − 1.5) | 1.6 (1.0 - 2.1) | 1.4 (1.1 − 1.6) |
Injury severity score, median (IQR) | 41 (33–49) | − | − |
Glasgow-Blatchford score, median (IQR) | − | 12 (11–14) | − |
Systolic blood pressure before REBOA (mmHg), median (IQR) | 78 (67–87) | 64 (61–77) | 71 (62–87) |
Base excess (mmol/L), median (IQR) | −9.0 (−18.7 − -6.3) | −11.5 (−14.6 − -9.2) | −9.4 (−15.1 − -6.4) |
pH, median (IQR) | 7.33 (7.25 − 7.41) | 7.30 (7.23 − 7.38) | 7.32 (7.23 − 7.39) |
Lactate (mg/dL), median (IQR) | 4.3 (3.2 − 9.0) | 6.3 (5.6 − 11.0) | 5.7 (3.7 − 11.0) |
Prothrombin time (%), median (IQR) | 64.5 (46.5 − 79.5) | 67.0 (51.0 − 73.0) | 67.0 (48.0 − 77.0) |
Activated partial thromboplastin time (sec), median (IQR) | 56.3 (41.4 − 75.9) | 39.3 (35.3 − 64.5) | 53.4 (38.2 − 75.7) |
Insertion at the ER, n (%) | 16 (100) | 6 (67) | 22 (88) |
Failed REBOA, n (%) | 3 (19) | 0 | 3 (12) |
Total occlusion time of REBOA (min), median (IQR) | 65 (57–99) | 55 (50–95) | 61 (51–98) |
PRBC transfusion within 24 h (mL), median (IQR) | 1540 (840–2590) | 1960 (1400–2800) | − |
FFP transfusion within 24 h (mL), median (IQR) Outcomes, n (%) | 720 (360–1440) | 900 (720–1440) | − |
Died at the ER | 5 (31) | 0 | 5 (20) |
Died within 24 h | 4 (25) | 1 (11) | 5 (20) |
Died within 2 months | 1 (6) | 2 (22) | 3 (12) |
ER emergency room, FFP fresh frozen plasma, 1QR interquartile range, PRBC packed red blood cells and REBOA resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta; * p < 0.05 vs. trauma group
Table 3.
No. | Age | Sex | SI | Glasgow- Blatchford score | Clinical Rock all score | Diagnosis | Treatment | Sheath insertion | Position (Zone) | CPA during procedure | Intervals for REBOA (miri) | REBOA-related complications | Outcome | Cause of death | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ER | 24 h> | 3monts> | ||||||||||||||
17 | 69 | M | 1.6 | 13 | 3 | Gastric ulcer | Surgery | Success | I | No | 46 | None | Alive | .Alive | .Alive | - |
IS | 50 | M | 1.0 | 12 | 2 | Duodenal ulcer Pseudo - aneurysm | AE (failed endoscopy) | Success | I | No | 50 | None | Alive | Alive | Alive | - |
19 | 64 | M | 2.1 | 11 | 3 | by pancreatic fistula | AE | Success | I | Yes | 54 | None | Alive | Alive | Alive | - |
20 | S3 | M | 2.1 | 19 | 4 | Duodenal ticer | Endoscopy | Success | I | No | 140 | None | Alive | Alive | Alive | - |
21 | 36 | M | 0.7 | 7 | 3 | Gastric ulcer | Endoscopy | Success | I | No | 20 | None | Alive | Alive | Alive | - |
22 | 69 | M | 2.S | 17 | 3 | Gastric ulcer | Endoscopy | Success | I | No | 57 | None | Alive | Alive | Alive | - |
23 | 72 | M | 1.2 | 9 | 3 | Gastric ulcer/ Cerebral infarction | AE (failed endoscopy) | Success | I | Yes | 55 | None | Alive | Alive | Dead | Exsanguination |
24 | 69 | M | 1.7 | 12 | 3 | Duodenal ulcer | AE (failed endoscopy) | Success | I | Yes | 95 | None | Alive | .Alive | Dead | Ischemic encephalopathy |
25 | 78 | M | O.S | 14 | 5 | Duodenal ulcer | AE (failed endoscopy) | Success | I | No | 145 | None | Alive | Dead | - | Exsanguination |
SI shock index, CPA cardiopulm onary arrest, REBOA resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta, ER emergencyroom, AE angioembolizatoin
In Table 1, the Glasgow-Blatchford score in the Non-trauma group was mistakenly left blank. This should have read: ‘12 (11–14)’. Additionally, the abbreviations listed in the Table footnote were inconsistent with the abbreviations found in the Table itself. APACHE and ICU should not have been included in the footnote, and FFP (fresh frozen plasma) and PRBC (packed red blood cells) were omitted by mistake. A revised Table 1 is published in this erratum.
In Table 3, the ages of patients no. 17, 19 and 25 were incorrectly given in the Table. These ages should have been 64, 78 and 69 respectively. Also, the Diagnosis of patient no. 18 was incorrectly given as ‘Gastric ulcer’. This should have been ‘Duodenum ulcer’. A revised Table 3 is published in this erratum.
Footnotes
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/s13049-016-0205-8.
Reference
- 1.Tsurukiri J, Akamine I, Sato T, Sakurai M, Okumura E, Moriya M, et al. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for uncontrolled haemorrahgic shock as an adjunct to haemostatic procedures in the acute care setting. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;24:13. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0205-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]