Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 17.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2015 Nov 10;137(45):14268–14271. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b10364

Asymmetric Catalysis with Ethylene. Synthesis of Functionalized Chiral Enolates

Souvagya Biswas 1, Jordan P Page 1, Kendra R Dewese 1, T V RajanBabu 1,*
PMCID: PMC4869691  NIHMSID: NIHMS785105  PMID: 26529467

Abstract

Trialkylsilyl enol ethers are versatile intermediates often used as enolate surrogates for the synthesis of carbonyl compounds. Yet there are no reports of broadly applicable, catalytic methods for the synthesis of chiral silyl enol ethers carrying latent functionalities useful for synthetic operations beyond the many possible reactions of the silyl enol ether moiety itself. Here we report a general procedure for highly catalytic (substrate:catalyst ratio up to 1000:1) and enantioselective (92% to 98% major enantiomer) synthesis of such compounds bearing a vinyl group at a chiral carbon at the β-position. The reactions, run under ambient conditions, use trialkylsiloxy-1,3-dienes and ethylene (1 atmosphere) as precursors, and readily available (bis-phosphine)-cobalt(II) complexes as catalysts. The silyl enolates can be readily converted into novel enantiopure vinyl triflates, a class of highly versatile cross-coupling reagents, enabling the syntheses of other enantiomerically pure, stereo-defined trisubstituted alkene intermediates not easily accessible by current methods. Examples of Kumada, Stille and Suzuki coupling reactions are illustrated.


Trialkylsilyl enol ethers are among the most widely used nucleophilic reagents in organic synthesis because of the ease of their preparation and the facile reactions they undergo with a broad range of electrophiles to form highly functionalized carbonyl compounds.1 Many of these reactions exhibit exquisite reagent- and catalyst-dependent selectivities at every level – chemo-, regio-, and stereoselectivity – in the bond-forming processes.2 Development of highly efficient and enantioselective protocols for the synthesis of functionalized silyl enol ethers would considerably expand the utility of these venerable intermediates. The closest precedent for a catalytic reaction that results in the regio- and stereoselective synthesis of a silyl enol ether involves a Rh(L*)-catalyzed enantioselective conjugate addition (Scheme 1) of an alkenylorganozirconium reagent to a cycloalkenone (1) followed by a difficult (large excess of 4 reagents, long reaction times) in situ silylation of the weakly reactive zirconium-enolate 2 (see step 2).3a The reaction shows poor selectivity for the preparation of acyclic derivatives (e. g., 4).3b While similar catalytic asymmetric conjugate alkenylation of enones using alkenyl boronates4a,b and alkenyl aluminum reagents4c,d are known, no such reaction has been reported for simple vinyl (H2C=CH-) additions. In all these cases, the products of addition are almost invariably the ketones, and not the more synthetically useful, regioselectively trapped enolates. Highly specialized silyl enolate products are formed, but never isolated, in some asymmetric metal-catalyzed reactions including hetero-Diels-Alder reactions of siloxy-1,3-dienes.5 Here we report a general procedure for highly catalytic, chemo-, regio- and enantioselective synthesis of silyl enol ethers that carry a vinyl-bearing chiral center at the β-position (6, Scheme 2). The reactions, which proceed under ambient conditions, couple siloxy-1,3-dienes (5) and ethylene (1 atm), use as little as 0.001 – 0.05 equiv. of readily available cobalt complexes, and give products in high yield (>90%) and exceptionally high enantioselectivity (92-98%ee). The silyl enolates can be readily converted into nearly enantiopure vinyl triflates (7), which are potentially valuable precursors for a variety of cross-coupling reactions.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Enantioselective 1,4-Addition as a Route to Chiral Silyl Enol Ethers

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Co(II)-Catalyzed Asymmetric Hydrovinylation of Siloxydienes (this work)

Our studies started with an examination of the hydrovinylation of a prototypical trimethylsiloxy-1,3- diene, 8a, under conditions described in eq 1, which was arrived at in initial optimization studies. In these experiments,6 carried out using cobalt (II) chloride-complexes of 1,n-bis-diphenylphosphinoalkane ligands and various promoters, we recognized that trimethylaluminum, a Lewis acidic alkylating agent which we had successfully used previously 7 gave unacceptable yields of the expected hydrovinylation product (9a). Alternate procedures using Zn/ZnI2 in place of the aluminum reagents8 also gave unsatisfactory results. The major product in these reactions arises from simple decomposition of the sensitive silyloxydiene 8a to regenerate the enone from which this substrate was prepared. On the other hand, a relatively weaker alkylating agent, methylaluminoxane (MAO), which is an easily handled solid reagent,9 gave excellent yields of the addition products. In all cases, the major product was identified as the branched 1,4-adduct, (E)-9.10 A minor side-product that is observed in some of the reactions is the linear 1,4-adduct 10a. Among the cobalt complexes, (dppp)CoCl2 [dppp = 1,3-bis-diphenylphosphinopropane], gave an exceptionally clean reaction to yield the product (E)-9a in quantitative yield. Likewise, the corresponding triethylsilyl and t-butyldimethylsilyloxy dienes, 8b and 8c, also gave the respective adducts (9b and 9c) in excellent yields and exquisite E-selectivity (eq 1).

graphic file with name nihms-785105-f0001.jpg (1)

The hydrovinylation reaction has a broad scope as illustrated by the examples 8a-8p in Table 1. Under the optimized conditions, the reactions of the 2-trimethylsiloxydienes 8a-8pproceed at room temperature giving excellent yields of the hydrovinylation products. In all cases except 8k(entry 9), the hydrovinylation favors the branched product in which the hydrogen is attached to the terminal, unsubstituted carbon, C1, and the vinyl group to a Supporting Information for details. b No other products the C4 of the original diene. When the trialkylsiloxy group is on C3 (e.g., 8h, compared to 8a where it is on C2 by this detected by GC. c After hydrolysis to ketone. d Only a 1,4-numbering scheme), proportionally more linear product 10h (up to 25%) is also formed (entry 6). Dienes with bulkier substituents (R) at the C4 position (8f, R = t-Bu and 8g, R = i-Pr) take up to 20 h to give moderate yields of the products. An enantiopure siloxydiene derived from (–)-citronellal, 8j, undergoes the reaction giving excellent yield of the expected product as a mixture of 1:1 diastereomers (at C4) with the achiral (dppp)CoCl2 complex (entry 8). A diene with a phenyl substituent in the C4-position (8k) does not give any of the expected products. Instead a linear 1,4-adduct, (Z)-6-phenyl-1,4-hexadiene (10k), is formed in 80% yield (entry 9). Entries 10-14 show a class of substrates where one of the double bonds of diene is embedded in a cycloalkene, which allows for the regio- and stereoselective preparation of 1,2-dialkylated cycloalkanes. The substrates for these reactions are readily prepared from the corresponding cycloalkanones in two steps using the Meyer-Schuster rearrangement11 as the key step.10 The siloxydienes 8l-8p, derived from C6 – C8 cycloalkanones, lead to exclusive formation of the branched 1,4-hydrovinylation products (9l-9p) with the vinyl group attached to a ring carbon. No trace of the alternate achiral linear 1,4-adduct or the 1,2-adduct was observed in any of the reactions. As shown in entries 12 and 13, the triethylsiloxy- and t-butyldimethylsiloxy- derivatives (8n and 8o) engage in the reaction just as well as the trimethylsiloxy derivative (8m), giving comparable yields of the expected products. The t-butyldimethylsiloxy-adduct, 9o, is hydrolytically stable and is readily purified by column chromatography on silica gel.

Table 1.

Scope of Hydrovinylation of 2-Siloxy-1,3-dienesa

graphic file with name nihms-785105-t0003.jpg
a

Supporting Information for details.

b No other products detected by GC. c After hydrolysis to ketone. d Only a 1,4-linear product 10k is formed.

Next, we turned our attention to asymmetric variants of these reactions. Asymmetric hydrovinylations of prototypical siloxydienes 8a-c were attempted using various Co(II)-complexes of several commercially available chiral bisphosphines in the presence of MAO as a promoter. Based on the initial observations, 2,3-O-isopropylidene-2,3-dihydroxy-1,4-bis-(diphenylphosphino)butane (DIOP) and 2,3 bis-(diphenylphosphino)pentane (BDPP) were chosen for further study under conditions shown in eq 2. As is the case with the structurally analogous complex (dppp)CoCl2, the enantioselective reaction of 8a using the [(S,S)-BDPP]CoCl2 complex is very facile, and proceeds to completion in less than 30 minutes at room temperature with 0.05 equivalents of the catalyst. The configuration of the product was established by converting the adduct 9a to the known saturated ketone 11a via hydrolysis of the enol ether to a β-vinylketone and subsequent hydrogenation of the alkene using Wilkinson’s catalyst [RhCl(PPh3)3(cat) /CH2Cl2/ 25 °C/ 16 h)].10 In a preparative scale reaction (5 g), using 0.01 equivalents of [(S,S)-DIOP]-CoCl2 catalyst, 90% yield of the product (R)-9a (98% ee) was isolated after bulb-to-bulb distillation. To our delight, we also find that the [(S,S)-DIOP] CoCl2 complex also gave excellent yields (>90%) and enantioselectivities (>95% ee) for the triethylsiloxy- and the t-butyldimethylsiloxy dienes 8b and 8c (see eq 1 for structures).

Further scope of the enantioselective transformation was explored using the siloxydienes previously listed in Table 1 and the results are shown in Table 2. Since the cobalt(II)-BDPP-complex gave acceptable yields and enantioselectivities for most of the substrates, our studies were largely limited to this catalyst. However, substrates 8a and 8d gave relatively lower selectivities (entries 1 and 5) with this complex. Gratifyingly, asymmetric hydrovinylation of these substrates using the cobalt (II)-DIOP-complex, gave excellent yields and >97% ee for the expected products (Table 2, entries 2 and 6). The sterically demanding 4-t-butyl-2-trimethylsiloxy-1,3-butadiene (8f) failed to react even under more forcing conditions.

Table 2.

Asymmetric Hydrovinylation of 1,3-siloxydienesa

entry diene b cat.(equiv.),
time (h)
product yield
(%)
ee
(%) c
1. 8a 0.05, 0.5 (S)-9a >95 84
2. 8a 0.05, 0.17 d (R)-9a 95 98
3. 8b 0.05, 0.17 d (R)-9b >90 >95
4. 8c 0.05, 0.17 d (R)-9c >90 >95
5. 8d 0.05, 0.5 (S)-9d >95 80
6. 8d 0.05, 0.17 d (R)-9d 96 >97
7. 8e 0.05, 0.5 (S)-9e 93 97
8. 8f 0.20, 24 (S)-9f 0 --
9. 8g 0.05, 20 (S)-9g 88 >95
10. 8h 0.05, 0.25 (S)-9he >90 94
11. 8l 0.05, 0.5 (R)-9l 90 92
12. 8m 0.01, 2 (R)-9m >90 96
13 8m 0.001, 36 (R)-9m 93 96
14. 8n 0.05, 0.25 (R)-9n >90 93
15. 8o 0.05, 0.25 (R)-9o 78 g 87
16. 8p 0.05, 20 (R)-9p 68 98
17. 8j 0.05, 0.25d 9j [C4(R)] 91 97:3h
18. 8j 0.05, 0.25f 9j [C4(S)] 92 96:4h
a

See Supporting Information for further details. Using [(S,S)-BDPP]CoCl2 except entries 2, 3, 4, 6, 17 where the (S,S)-DIOP complex is used.

b

See Table 1 for structures of siloxydienes and the corresponding products.

c

Determined by CSP GC.

d

Using [(S,S)-DIOP]CoCl2.

e

10h (9%) also formed.

f

Using [(R,R)-DIOP]CoCl2.

g

Isolated by column chromatography.

h

Diastereomeric (at C4) ratio.

graphic file with name nihms-785105-f0002.jpg (2)

(Table 2, entries 2 and 6). The sterically demanding 4-t-butyl-2-trimethylsiloxy-1,3-butadiene (8f) failed to react even under more forcing conditions. The corresponding i-propyl-derivative 8g reacts sluggishly (20 h, 0.05 equiv. of catalyst), yet giving very high ee for the expected product, 9g (entry 9). The siloxydienes derived from cylic ketones 8l-8p (see Table 1 for structures) are also excellent substrates for the asymmetric hydrovinylation, giving excellent yields of the expected product in very high enantioselectivities (entries 11-16). A preparative scale run on 2.5 mmol scale of the substrate 8m uses only 0.01 equivalents of the catalyst (2 h, rt) to give >90% yield of the product in 96% ee (entry 12). Indeed this reaction can be run with as little as 0.001 equivalent (substrate:catalyst 1000:1, 2.5 mmol scale) of the catalyst (entry 13).12 Since the enantiopure siloxydiene 8j showed no inherent selectivity in the formation of the newly created chiral center in the HV reaction with the achiral catalyst [(dppp)CoCl2] (Table 1, entry 8, diastereomeric ratio 1:1), we examined the reaction of this substrate with enantiomeric [DIOP]CoCl2 complexes. As shown in entries 17 and 18 the enantiomeric complexes [(R,R)-DIOP]CoCl2 and [(S,S)-DIOP]CoCl2 exert excellent catalyst control in the hydrovinylation reaction, and the adducts are formed in diastereomeric ratios [at C4 (S): C4 (R)] 96:4 and 3:97 in the respective cases.

Conversion of silyl enolates to suitable precursors for cross-coupling would considerably expand the utility of this chemistry. For this we turned to alkenyl triflates which could be formed via the lithium enolates and subsequent trapping by PhN(Tf)2 (Scheme 3). The conversions of the silyl enolates to the vinyl triflates (12-17) and their subsequent cross coupling reactions (typical examples of products: 18-20) proceed with complete retention of configuration at the double bond and preservation of the vinylbearing stereogenic center. Examples of Kumada, Stille and Suzuki coupling reactions of a prototypical vinyl triflate (12) are included in the Supporting Information. The reactivity difference between the mono-substituted and the stereo-defined trisubstituted double bonds in these 1,4-skipped diene products13 should make these almost enantiopure intermediates valuable components for further synthesis. Further applications of the silyl enol ethers and the enol triflates are the subject of on-going investigations.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Synthesis of Enol Triflates and Cross-Coupling Products

Supplementary Material

SpportInfo

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Financial assistance for this research provided by US NSF (CHE-1057818) and NIH (R01 GM108762) is gratefully acknowledged.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supporting Information

Experimental procedures for the scouting experiments, typical reaction conditions for the hydrovinylation reactions. Chromatographic and spectroscopic data for all compounds. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org

REFERENCES

  • (1).(a) Wyatt P, Warren S. Organic Syntheis: Strategy and Control. John Wiley and Sons; Chichester: 2007. [Google Scholar]; (b) Carey FA, Sundberg RJ. Advanced Organic Chemistry Parts A and B. 5th Springer; New York: 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.(a) Stoltz BM, Bennett NB, Duquette DC, Goldberg AFG, Liu Y, Loewinger MB, Reeves CM. Alkylations of Enols and Enolates. In: Knochel P, editor. Comprehensive Organic Synthesis II. 2nd. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 2014. pp. 1–55. For example, see: Alkylation: (1) [Google Scholar]; (b) Kobayashi S, Yoo WJ, Yamashita Y. C-C Bond Formation using Lewis Acids and Silicon Enolates. In: Carreira EM, Yamamoto H, editors. Comprehensive Chirality. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 2012. pp. 168–197. Additon to carbonyl compounds: [Google Scholar]; (c) Chen B-C, Zhou P, Davis FA, Ciganek E. Organic Reactions. Vol. 62. John Wiley; Hoboken, NJ: 2004. α-Hydroxylation of Enolates and Silyl Enol Ethers; pp. 1–356. Cα-Hetero-atom bond formation: [Google Scholar]; (d) Smith AMR, Hii KK. Chem. Rev. 2011;111:1637. doi: 10.1021/cr100197z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) RajanBabu TV, Reddy GS, Fukunaga T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985;107:5473. Aromatic substitution: [Google Scholar]; (f) Graening T, Hartwig JF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:17192. doi: 10.1021/ja0566275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Brazeau J-F, Zhang S, Colomer I, Corkey BK, Toste FD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:2742. doi: 10.1021/ja210388g. Catalyzed addition to alkynes: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Westmeier J, Pfaff C, Siewert J, von Zezschwitz P. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013;355:2651. [Google Scholar]; Duursma A, Boiteau JG, Lefort L, Boogers JAF, de Vries AHM, de Vries JG, Minnaard AJ, Feringa BL. J. Org. Chem. 2004;69:8045. doi: 10.1021/jo0487810. For another example of a β-vinylation of an acyclic enone using a vinylboronate nucleophile giving low selectivity (42% ee), see: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.(a) Wu TR, Chong JM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:4908. doi: 10.1021/ja0713734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Okamoto K, Hayashi T, Rawal VH. Org. Lett. 2008;10:4387. doi: 10.1021/ol801931v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) May TL, Dabrowski JA, Hoveyda AH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:736. doi: 10.1021/ja110054q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) McGrath KP, Hoveyda AH. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014;53:1910. doi: 10.1002/anie.201309456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.(a) Mikami K, Aikawa K. Asymmetric ene reactions and cycloadditions. In: Ojima I, editor. Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis. John Wiley; Hoboken, NJ: 2010. pp. 725–733. See for example, [Google Scholar]; (b) Kawasaki M, Yamamoto H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:16482. doi: 10.1021/ja066726y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) For an enantioselective intramolecular addition of a siloxydiene to an alkyne leading to a chiral silyl enol ether, see ref. 2g.
  • 6. For details of the optimization studies, see Supporting Information SI-Table 1 (p. S12) and SI-Table 2 (p. S14)
  • 7.(a) Timsina YN, Sharma RK, RajanBabu TV. Chem. Sci. 2015;6:3994. doi: 10.1039/c5sc00929d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Sharma RK, RajanBabu TV. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:3295. doi: 10.1021/ja1004703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Grutters MMP, Muller C, Vogt D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:7414. doi: 10.1021/ja058095y. For the first report of a Co-catalyzed asymmetric hydrovinylation, see: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) RajanBabu TV, Smith CR. Enantioselective Hydrovinylation of Alkenes. In: Carreira EM, Yamamoto H, editors. Comprehensive Chirality. Vol. 5. Elsevier; London: 2012. pp. 355–398. For recent reviews of hydrovinylation, see: [Google Scholar]; (e) Hilt G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012:4441. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kersten L, Hilt G. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012;354:863. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Reddy SS, Radhakrishnan K, Sivaram S. Polymer Bulletin. 1996;36:165. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. See Supporting Information for full experimental details.
  • 11.Engel DA, Dudley GB. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009;7:4149. doi: 10.1039/b912099h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Page JP, RajanBabu TV. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:6556–6559. doi: 10.1021/ja301640e. The siloxydienes are significantly more reactive compared to the corresponding unsubstituted dienes. For example, with 0.001 equiv. catalyst, there is practically no reaction under otherwise identical conditions for comparable substrates without the siloxy substituent. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.(a) Macklin TK, Micalizio GC. Nature Chem. 2010;2:638. doi: 10.1038/nchem.665. For two recent applications and a list of more extensive references, see: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Huang Y, Fananas-Mastral M, Minnaard AJ, Feringa BL. Chem. Commun. 2013;49:3309. doi: 10.1039/c3cc41021h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SpportInfo

RESOURCES