Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 May 18;6:26332. doi: 10.1038/srep26332

Cross-linked Composite Gel Polymer Electrolyte using Mesoporous Methacrylate-Functionalized SiO2 Nanoparticles for Lithium-Ion Polymer Batteries

Won-Kyung Shin 1, Jinhyun Cho 1, Aravindaraj G Kannan 1, Yoon-Sung Lee 2, Dong-Won Kim 1,a
PMCID: PMC4870681  PMID: 27189842

Abstract

Liquid electrolytes composed of lithium salt in a mixture of organic solvents have been widely used for lithium-ion batteries. However, the high flammability of the organic solvents can lead to thermal runaway and explosions if the system is accidentally subjected to a short circuit or experiences local overheating. In this work, a cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolyte was prepared and applied to lithium-ion polymer cells as a safer and more reliable electrolyte. Mesoporous SiO2 nanoparticles containing reactive methacrylate groups as cross-linking sites were synthesized and dispersed into the fibrous polyacrylonitrile membrane. They directly reacted with gel electrolyte precursors containing tri(ethylene glycol) diacrylate, resulting in the formation of a cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolyte with high ionic conductivity and favorable interfacial characteristics. The mesoporous SiO2 particles also served as HF scavengers to reduce the HF content in the electrolyte at high temperature. As a result, the cycling performance of the lithium-ion polymer cells with cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolytes employing methacrylate-functionalized mesoporous SiO2 nanoparticles was remarkably improved at elevated temperatures.

The rapidly expanding use of rechargeable lithium-ion batteries as power sources for portable electronic devices, electric vehicles and energy storage systems has led to intensive research on electrolyte systems with high electrochemical performance1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8. The liquid electrolyte used in lithium-ion batteries is based on lithium salt dissolved in a mixture of organic carbonate solvents. It provides high conductivity, acceptable electrochemical stability and good cycle performance. However, current lithium-ion batteries have risks associated with leakage and fire hazards due to the high flammability of the organic solvents9,10,11. In addition, the polyolefin separators used in lithium-ion batteries may shrink and even melt at elevated temperatures, which may cause a short circuit between the two electrodes in cases where unusually high heat is generated12,13,14. Therefore, there is a pressing need for safer and more reliable electrolyte systems. Among various electrolyte systems, gel polymer electrolytes have received considerable attention due to their high ionic conductivity, good interfacial adhesion to electrodes and effective encapsulation of organic solvents in the cell, resulting in suppression of solvent leakage and enhanced safety15,16,17. However, the incorporation of liquid electrolyte into the polymer matrix to improve the ionic conductivity deteriorated the mechanical strength of the polymer electrolyte, leading to internal shorts and battery failure. The mechanical strength of the gel polymer electrolytes was enhanced by in-situ chemical cross-linking or addition of inorganic fillers such as SiO2, Al2O3, TiO2 and BaTiO318,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26. In the in-situ thermal cross-linking process, gel electrolyte precursors containing liquid electrolyte and cross-linking agents were injected directly into the cell, and a cross-linked gel polymer electrolyte was formed by free radical polymerization triggered by thermal initiation27,28,29. The cross-linked polymer networks that were swelled with the liquid electrolyte showed high ionic conductivity, favorable interfacial properties and good mechanical strength. In our previous studies, we synthesized cross-linked composite polymer electrolytes using reactive SiO2 particles with C=C double bonds30. The reactive vinyl groups on the surface of the SiO2 particles allowed an in-situ cross-linking reaction with the gel electrolyte precursor by free radical polymerization. However, these reactive SiO2 particles had a non-porous structure, and thus Li+ ion transport was blocked by insulating SiO2 particles. Therefore, the connectivity of the ion-conducting pathway became more tortuous in these composite gel polymer electrolytes. To solve this problem, we synthesized mesoporous SiO2 nanoparticles containing reactive methacrylate groups as inorganic cross-linking sites, and these particles were uniformly dispersed into a fibrous polyacrylonitrile (PAN) membrane. The methacrylate-functionalized SiO2 (MA-SiO2) nanoparticles in the PAN membrane directly reacted with a gel electrolyte precursor containing tri(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (TEGDA), resulting in the formation of a cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolyte with high ionic conductivity and good interfacial adhesion to the electrodes. The cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolytes synthesized using these mesoporous SiO2 particles were utilized in lithium-ion polymer cells with a graphite negative electrode and a LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 positive electrode. The cycling performance of the cells was evaluated and compared to those of cells assembled with a cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolyte employing non-porous SiO2 nanoparticles.

Results and Discussion

Figure 1a illustrates the scheme for synthesis of mesoporous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles31. In contrast to the non-porous SiO2 particles, lithium ions can pass through mesoporous SiO2 particles due to their intra-connected pore network structure, as illustrated in Fig. 1b. A schematic representation of the preparation of cross-linked composite polymer electrolytes using a fibrous PAN membrane and mesoporous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles is shown in Fig. 2. The composite membrane with mesoporous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles was prepared by simply dipping the fibrous PAN membrane in a solution containing mesoporous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles followed by vacuum drying. The composite membrane was used in the lithium-ion cell, and the cell was injected with gel electrolyte precursor containing a small amount of TEGDA and liquid electrolyte. An in-situ cross-linking reaction was then initiated at 70 °C for 1 h to form the cross-linked gel polymer electrolyte.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Schematic illustrations for (a) synthesis of mesoporous MA-SiO2 particles, and (b) different lithium ion transport behavior when employing non-porous MA-SiO2 particles and mesoporous MA-SiO2 particles in the cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolyte.

Figure 2. Schematic illustrations of the synthesis of the cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolyte using the fibrous PAN membrane, mesoporous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles and gel electrolyte precursor containing TEGDA.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) images of non-porous and mesoporous MA-SiO2 are presented in Fig. 3a,b, respectively. Both particles exhibited spherical shape with an average diameter of around 35 nm. For further comparison, the morphologies of non-porous and mesoporous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles were examined using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), as shown in Fig. 3c,d, respectively. We found that the mesoporous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles had inner-pore channels that can provide pathways for lithium ions to move through the mesoporous SiO2 nanoparticles. In contrast, the non-porous MA-SiO2 particles exhibited an impermeable inner structure, indicating that lithium ions cannot pass through the MA-SiO2 particles. Figure 4 shows the nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms of non-porous and mesoporous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles. The isotherm of the mesoporous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles exhibited a characteristic Type IV curve. The characteristic feature of the Type IV isotherm is a hysteresis loop, which is associated with capillary condensation taking place in the mesopores; this condensation limits uptake over a range of high relative pressures32. Type IV isotherms are typically observed in mesoporous materials33,34. The Brunauer-Emmet-Teller (BET) surface area of non-porous and mesoporous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles were measured to be 86.5 and 292.3 m2 g−1, respectively. The pore volume of mesoporous MA-SiO2 particles was about 1.14 cm3 g−1, which was much higher than that of non-porous nanoparticles (0.27 cm3 g−1). These results indicate that the higher surface area of the mesoporous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles mainly arose from their higher pore volumes. The pore size distribution of mesoporous MA-SiO2 particles is shown in Fig. S1 (Supplementary Information). It shows two different pore sizes with average pore diameters of 9.2 and 15.1 nm, respectively, in which, larger pores (15.1 nm) are predominantly present in the sample. This result confirms that the pores in MA-SiO2 particles are mesoporous in nature, which is well consistent with the TEM results.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

FE-SEM images of (a) non-porous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles and (b) mesoporous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles. TEM images of (c) non-porous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles and (d) mesoporous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles.

Figure 4. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms for non-porous MA-SiO2 and mesoporous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Figure 5a,b present FE-SEM images of an electrospun PAN membrane at two different magnifications, which show a highly porous and interconnected three-dimensional fibrous network structure with micron-sized pores. The fibrous PAN membranes were dipped in a solution containing MA-SiO2 nanoparticles, and the membranes were then dried. As a result, both non-porous and mesoporous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles were uniformly close-packed in the large pores of the fibrous PAN membrane, as shown in Fig. 5c–f. These MA-SiO2 nanoparticles have reactive C=C double bonds on their surface, and thus they can serve as cross-linking sites through free radical polymerization in the fibrous PAN membrane. The thicknesses of the composite membranes containing non-porous and mesoporous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles were measured to be 40 μm, which was about the same as the fibrous PAN membranes without MA-SiO2 nanoparticles. This result suggests that most of the MA-SiO2 nanoparticles were embedded into the large pores of the fibrous PAN membrane rather than merely residing on the surface. A thermal cross-linking reaction was carried out using the composite membrane, gel electrolyte precursor containing TEGDA and liquid electrolyte to form a cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolyte. Before cell assembly, FT-IR analysis was performed to confirm the chemical cross-linking reaction between mesoporous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles and TEGDA, and the resulting FT-IR spectra are shown in Fig. S2. The pristine fibrous PAN membrane showed peaks at 2240 and 1446 cm−1, which corresponded to C-N stretching vibrations and C-H bending vibrations, respectively35. When the MA-SiO2 nanoparticles were added into the fibrous PAN membrane, peaks corresponding to the siloxane (Si-O-Si) group (1190 and 1082 cm−1), C=O bonds (1721 cm−1) and C=C double bonds (1636 cm−1) were additionally observed36,37,38, indicating that MA-SiO2 nanoparticles containing methacrylate groups were well incorporated in the porous PAN membrane. The FT-IR spectrum of the cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolyte revealed that the peaks corresponding to C=C double bonds in the MA-SiO2 particles (1636 cm−1) and TEGDA (1618 cm−1) disappeared after thermal cross-linking. This result indicates that methacrylate groups on the surface of MA-SiO2 particles reacted with TEGDA through free radical polymerization to form cross-linked gel polymer electrolytes. The electrolyte solution was well encapsulated in the cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolyte, and the organic solvents did not leak out. Also, the adhesion between the PAN membrane and the SiO2 nanoparticles is very strong, since the mesoporous MA-SiO2 particles contain many reactive groups that participate in radical polymerization with TEGDA during cross-linking reaction, which prevents SiO2 particles from detaching from the PAN membrane. The mechanical strength of the cross-linked PAN-based polymer membranes was measured, and the results are shown in Fig. S3. It is clearly seen that the incorporation of mesoporous MA-SiO2 particles into the PAN membrane improved the tensile strength. This result implies that the mesoporous and reactive SiO2 nanoparticles with high mechanical strength participate in the chemical cross-linking reaction with TEGDA as cross-linking sites, thereby resulting in increase of degree of cross-linking and mechanical strength. To investigate the distribution of MA-SiO2 nanoparticles in the fibrous PAN membrane after the thermal cross-linking reaction, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) mapping images of nitrogen and silicon elements in the cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolyte were obtained, as shown in Fig. S4. The silicon arising from MA-SiO2 nanoparticles was evenly distributed in the cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolyte, indicating homogeneous dispersion of MA-SiO2 nanoparticles.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

FE-SEM images of electrospun PAN membrane (a,b), composite PAN membrane with non-porous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles (c,d) and composite PAN membrane with mesoporous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles (e,f) at two different magnifications.

We evaluated the cycling performance of lithium-ion polymer cells assembled using an in-situ cross-linking reaction with the composite membranes containing MA-SiO2 nanoparticles and gel electrolyte precursor. The cell was initially subjected to a preconditioning cycle over a voltage range of 3.0–4.5 V at a rate of 0.1 C. After two cycles at the 0.1 C rate, the cell was cycled in the same voltage range at a 0.5 C rate (0.8 mA cm−2). Figure 6a shows the voltage profiles of the lithium-ion polymer cell assembled with a cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolyte employing mesoporous MA-SiO2 particles. The cell initially delivered a discharge capacity of 179.5 mAh g−1 based on active LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 material in the positive electrode. It delivered a discharge capacity of 157.9 mAh g−1 after 300 cycles, corresponding to 88.0% of the initial discharge capacity. Figure 6b compares the discharge capacities of the cells prepared with composite membranes containing different types of MA-SiO2 particles (non-porous MA-SiO2 particles and mesoporous MA-SiO2 particles) as a function of cycle number. For the purpose of comparison, the cycling results of the cell assembled with cross-linked gel polymer electrolyte using a fibrous PAN membrane (without MA-SiO2 particles) and gel electrolyte precursor are also shown. The initial discharge capacity of the cell was slightly decreased when using cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolytes with MA-SiO2 particles. The presence of reactive MA-SiO2 particles in the composite membrane may increase the degree of cross-linking and increase the resistance of ion migration in the cell, resulting in a reduction in discharge capacity. The cell assembled with mesoporous MA-SiO2 particles delivered higher discharge capacity than the cell with non-porous MA-SiO2 particles. This result can be ascribed to the higher ionic conductivity of the cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolyte employing mesoporous MA-SiO2 particles. The ionic conductivities of the cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolytes prepared with non-porous MA-SiO2 particles and mesoporous MA-SiO2 particles were 1.1 × 10−3 and 1.8 × 10−3 S cm−1, respectively. As mentioned earlier, the mesoporous SiO2 nanoparticles had many pores that provided an ion-conduction pathway through mesoporous SiO2 particles, resulting in a higher ionic conductivity than the cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolyte with non-porous SiO2 particles. With respect to capacity retention, the cell assembled with mesoporous MA-SiO2 particles exhibited the best cycling stability among the cells investigated. The presence of mesoporous MA-SiO2 particles with large surface areas in the fibrous PAN membrane allowed for increased cross-linking, which resulted in strong interfacial contacts with electrodes. Moreover, the effective encapsulation of liquid electrolyte in the cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolyte prevented leakage of the electrolyte solution during cycling, resulting in good cycling stability. To examine the effect of mesoporous MA-SiO2 particles on the cycling performance of the cells, AC impedance measurements were performed for each type of cell after 300 cycles, and the resulting AC impedance spectra are shown in Fig. 6c. All spectra exhibited two overlapping semicircles due to different interfacial resistance contributions. The first semicircle in the higher frequency range was attributed to resistance due to Li+ ion migration through the surface film on the electrodes (Rf), and the second semicircle in the middle to low frequency range arises from charge transfer resistance at the electrode-electrolyte interface (Rct)39,40. The electrolyte resistance estimated from the intercept on the real axis in the high-frequency range was the lowest in the cell employing mesoporous MA-SiO2 particles. In addition, the cell with mesoporous SiO2 particles had the lowest interfacial resistance after 300 cycles. In this cell, the cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolyte provided effective encapsulation of the electrolyte solution, and thus the deleterious reactions between the electrodes and the electrolyte were reduced, which resulted in limited growth of the resistive layer on electrode surface and enhanced interfacial stability. In-situ cross-linking in the presence of mesoporous MA-SiO2 particles with large surface areas also helped to intimately adhere the PAN membrane to the electrodes, thereby providing favorable charge transport between the electrolyte and electrodes. These results suggest that in-situ cross-linking of an electrolyte solution in the presence of mesoporous MA-SiO2 particles rather than non-porous MA-SiO2 particles was more effective for maintaining good interfacial contact between the electrodes and the electrolyte, and also improved retention of the electrolyte solution in the cell during cycling.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

(a) Charge and discharge curves of lithium-ion polymer cell assembled with the cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolyte using mesoporous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles and (b) discharge capacities of lithium-ion polymer cells assembled with different electrolytes at 25 °C (0.5 C CC & CV charge, 0.5 C CC discharge, cut-off voltage: 3.0–4.5 V). (c) AC impedance spectra of lithium-ion polymer cells assembled with different electrolytes, which were measured after 300 cycles.

The rate capability of the lithium-ion polymer cell assembled with different electrolytes was evaluated at various C rates. Voltage profiles of the cell prepared with cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolyte employing mesoporous MA-SiO2 particles are presented in Fig. 7a. Although the overpotential gradually increased with increasing current rate, the cell delivered a high discharge capacity of 142.7 mAh g−1 at a 5.0 C rate. Figure 7b compares the discharge capacities of the lithium-ion polymer cells assembled with non-porous MA-SiO2 particles and mesoporous MA-SiO2 particles at different current rates. In this test, the C rate gradually increased from 0.2 to 5.0 C every five cycles. Comparison of the rate capabilities of the two cells showed that the use of mesoporous MA-SiO2 particles improved the high rate performance. The cell with mesoporous MA-SiO2 particles also exhibited an ability to recover its capacity when the C rate decreased from 5.0 to 0.2 C. These results demonstrate that the use of mesoporous MA-SiO2 particles not only enhanced the rate capability, but also increased the cycling stability of the cell.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

(a) Discharge curves of lithium-ion polymer cell assembled with cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolyte employing mesoporous MA-SiO2 particles and (b) discharge capacities of lithium-ion polymer cells assembled with different electrolytes as a function of C rate.

Figure 8a shows the discharge capacities the lithium-ion polymer cells assembled with different electrolytes as a function of cycle number, which are obtained at 55 °C and 0.5 C rate. The cells delivered initial discharge capacities ranging from 184.7 to 187.0 mAh g−1, which were slightly higher than those obtained at 25 °C. The capacity retention at elevated temperature was greatly improved by using the cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolyte with mesoporous MA-SiO2 particles. The capacity fading of layered LiNixCoyMn1-x-yO2 electrodes at high temperatures is mainly due to structural instabilities as well as dissolution of transition metals from the active cathode material by HF attack41,42. HF is known to be generated by thermal decomposition and hydrolysis of LiPF6 by trace moisture in the electrolyte solution. Figure 8b shows the HF concentrations in the cells with different electrolytes; these values were measured after storing the cells at 55 °C for three days. Clearly, the HF content was significantly reduced in the cells with mesoporous MA-SiO2 particles. When mesoporous MA-SiO2 particles are exposed to the electrolyte solution containing HF, protonation of oxygen occurs by Bronsted acid–Lewis base reaction. Since the resulting oxonium intermediate is very unstable, the fluoride anions readily attack Si to form strong chemical bonds (Si–F) by a nucleophilic substitution reaction43. Since the nucleophilic substitution reaction of HF mainly occurred on the surface of the SiO2 particles, the mesoporous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles with high surface area were more effective in reducing HF concentration. Accordingly, the use of mesoporous MA-SiO2 particles with large surface area reduced HF content and suppressed the dissolution of transition metals from the active LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 material at elevated temperatures, thereby exhibiting stable cycling behavior at elevated temperatures.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

(a) Discharge capacities of lithium-ion polymer cells assembled with different electrolytes at 55 °C (0.5 C CC & CV charge, 0.5 C CC discharge, cut-off voltage: 3.0–4.5 V). (b) HF content in the different electrolytes after being stored at 55 °C for 3 days.

Conclusion

Mesoporous methacrylate-functionalized SiO2 nanoparticles were synthesized and embedded into a fibrous PAN membrane. A cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolyte was then prepared by an in-situ cross-linking reaction using the composite membrane employing mesoporous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles and electrolyte solutions containing a small amount of TEGDA. The cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolyte effectively encapsulated the electrolyte solution without solvent leakage and exhibited favorable interfacial characteristics. The in-situ chemical cross-linking using the mesoporous SiO2 nanoparticles was more effective than non-porous SiO2 nanoparticles for obtaining good cycling performance in terms of discharge capacity, capacity retention, rate capability and high temperature cycling stability.

Methods

Synthesis of mesoporous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles

Mesoporous silica nanoparticles were synthesized as reported in earlier literature31. Briefly, 0.4 g of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB, Daejung) and 0.045 g of L-lysine (TCI Co. Ltd.) were added to 140 ml of a mixture of water/octane (10:1 by volume), and this solution was stirred at 70 °C in a three-necked flask reactor. After a clear solution was obtained, 3.3 g of styrene (Kanto Chemical Co.), 4.0 g of tetraorthosilicate (TEOS, Evonik) and 0.14 g of azobis(2-methylpropionamide) dihydrochloride (AIBA, Sigma-Aldrich) were added, and the mixture was stirred for 20 h at 70 °C under a nitrogen atmosphere. After the reaction, the resulting solution was centrifuged and washed with ethanol several times. The polystyrene template was completely removed by heating at 550 °C for 10 h to obtain mesoporous SiO2 nanoparticles. Surface modification of mesoporous SiO2 nanoparticles was carried out by using 3-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane (MEMO, Evonik)44. 0.5 g of silica nanoparticles was dispersed in methanol via ultrasonication for 30 min, and 10.3 mmol L−1 of MEMO was added into the solution. The mixture was stirred for 1 h in order to induce surface functionalization with methacrylate groups. The resulting solution was centrifuged and washed with methanol several times. Mesoporous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles were finally obtained as a white powder after vacuum drying at 70 °C for 12 h.

Preparation of fibrous PAN membrane with mesoporous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles

The electrospun fibrous PAN membrane was prepared using an electrospinning method, as previously reported45. PAN (Mw = 150,000, Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in anhydrous N,N-dimethylformamide at 60 °C to a concentration of 10 wt.%, and the resulting polymer solution was injected through a capillary tip using a plastic syringe (10 ml). During electrospinning, a high voltage of 11 kV was applied to the needle, and the flow rate of the spinning solution was controlled to 0.8 ml h−1. The distance between the tip and the rotating drum collector was 16 cm, and the metal drum was rotated at 200 rpm. The electrospun PAN fibers were collected on an aluminum foil wrapped around the drum, and they were dried overnight in a vacuum oven at 100 °C. The thickness of the PAN membrane was controlled to be about 40 μm. The coating solution was prepared by dispersing 5 wt.% of the MA-SiO2 nanoparticles in ethanol by sonication for 1 h. The electrospun PAN membrane was then soaked in the coating solution, and the resulting composite PAN membrane was dried at 70 °C for 24 h.

Electrode preparation and cell assembly

The positive electrode was prepared by coating an N-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP)-based slurry containing LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 (3M Co.), poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVdF) and super-P carbon (MMM Co.) (85:7.5:7.5 by weight) onto aluminum foil. The electrode was dried under vacuum at 110 °C for 12 h. The electrode dimension was 2.8 × 3.8 cm2, and its active material loading corresponded to a capacity of about 1.6 mAh cm−2. The negative electrode was prepared similarly by coating the NMP-based slurry of mesocarbon microbeads (MCMB, Osaka gas), PVdF and super-P carbon (85/7.5/7.5 by weight) onto a copper foil. To prepare gel electrolyte precursor, 4 wt.% of TEGDA (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to liquid electrolyte with azobis(isobutyronitrile) (Junsei, 1 wt.% of TEGDA) as a thermal radical initiator. 1.15 M LiPF6 in ethylene carbonate (EC)/ethylmethyl carbonate (EMC) (3:7 by volume, PANAX ETEC Co. Ltd., battery grade) was used as the liquid electrolyte. The lithium-ion polymer cell was assembled by sandwiching a composite membrane between a graphite negative electrode and a LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 positive electrode. The cell was enclosed in a pouch injected with gel electrolyte precursor and was then vacuum-sealed. After the cell assembly, the cells were stored at 70 °C for 1 h in order to induce the in-situ chemical cross-linking reaction between the gel electrolyte precursor and the mesoporous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles. All cells were assembled in a dry box filled with argon gas.

Characterization and measurements

The morphologies of the mesoporous MA-SiO2 nanoparticles and fibrous PAN membrane were examined using FE-SEM (JEOL JSM-6330F) and TEM (JEOL JEM-2010). EDS mapping was used for morphological assessment and elemental characterization in the cross-linked composite gel polymer electrolyte. BET surface areas were measured by a nitrogen adsorption-desorption method using a 3 Flex Surface Characterization Analyzer (Micromeritics) and the pore size distribution was obtained from the analysis of adsorption branch of the isotherm using Barret-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method. FT-IR spectra were obtained using a Magna IR 760 spectrometer in the range of 400–4,000 cm−1 with KBr powder-pressed pellets. The mechanical properties of the cross-linked polymer membranes were measured using a universal test machine (Instron 5966) in accordance with the ASTM D882 method. Charge and discharge cycling tests of the lithium-ion polymer cells were conducted at a current density of 0.8 mA cm−2 (0.5 C rate) over a voltage range of 3.0–4.5 V using a battery cycler (WBCS 3000, WonA Tech Co., Ltd.) at 25 and 55 °C, respectively. AC impedance measurements were performed using an impedance analyzer (IM6, Zahner Electrik) over the frequency range of 5 mHz to 100 kHz with an amplitude of 10 mV. HF content in the electrolyte was measured using an acid-base titration method after the cell was stored in a 55 °C oven for 3 days. Methyl orange (Sigma-Aldrich) was used as an acid–base indicator.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Shin, W.-K. et al. Cross-linked Composite Gel Polymer Electrolyte using Mesoporous Methacrylate-Functionalized SiO2 Nanoparticles for Lithium-Ion Polymer Batteries. Sci. Rep. 6, 26332; doi: 10.1038/srep26332 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep26332-s1.pdf (224.8KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (2014R1A2A2A01002154) and the R&D Convergence Program of the NST (National Research Council of Science & Technology) of the Republic of Korea.

Footnotes

Author Contributions W.-K.S., Y.-S.L. and D.-W.K. designed the overall research. W.-K.S., J.C., A.G.K. and Y.-S.L. conducted the experiments. W.-K.S. and D.-W.K. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

References

  1. Tarascon J.-M. & Armand M. Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature 414, 359–367 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Xu K. Nonaqueous liquid electrolytes for lithium-based rechargeable batteries. Chem. Rev. 104, 4303–4417 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aurbach D. et al. Design of electrolyte solutions for Li and Li-ion batteries: a review. Electrochim. Acta 50, 247–254 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  4. Armand M., Endres F., MacFarlane D. R., Ohno H. & Scrosati B. Ionic-liquid materials for the electrochemical challenges of the future. Nature Mater. 8, 621–629 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Marom R., Amalraj S. F., Leifer N., Jacob D. & Aurbach D. A review of advanced and practical lithium battery materials. J. Mater. Chem. 21, 9938–9954 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  6. Goodenough J. B. & Park K.-S. The Li-ion rechargeable battery: A perspective (Review). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 1167–1176 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Manthiram A., Fu Y., Chung S.-H., Zu C. & Su Y.-S. Rechargeable lithium−sulfur batteries. Chem. Rev. 114, 11751–11787 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Xu K. Electrolytes and interphases in Li-ion batteries and beyond. Chem. Rev. 114, 11503–11618 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wen J., Yu Y. & Chen C. A review on lithium-ion batteries safety issues: existing problems and possible solutions. Mater. Express 2, 197–212 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  10. Huang P., Wang Q., Li K., Ping P. & Sun J. The combustion behavior of large scale lithium titanate battery. Sci. Rep. 5, 7788 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Finegan D. P. et al. In-operando high-speed tomography of lithium-ion batteries during thermal runaway. Nature Commun. 6, 6924 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Venugopal G., Moore J., Howard J. & Pendalwar S. Characterization of microporous separators for lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 77, 34–41 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  13. Arora P. & Zhang Z. Battery separators. Chem. Rev. 104, 4419–4462 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhang S. S. A review on the separators of liquid electrolyte Li-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 164, 351–364 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  15. Song J. Y., Wang Y. Y. & Wan C. C. Review of gel-type polymer electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 77, 183–197 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  16. Hassoun J., Reale P. & Scrosati B. Recent advances in liquid and polymer lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. 17, 3668–3677 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee Y. S., Lee J. H., Choi J. A., Yoon. W. Y. & Kim D. W. Cycling characteristics of lithium powder polymer batteries assembled with composite gel polymer electrolytes and lithium powder anode. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 1019–1027 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  18. Choi J. A. et al. Cycling performance of a lithium-ion polymer cell assembled by in-situ chemical cross-linking with fluorinated phosphorous-based cross-linking agent. J. Power Sources 195, 6177–6181 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  19. Patel M. & Bhattacharyya A. J. A crosslinked “polymer-gel” rechargeable lithium-ion battery electrolyte from free radical polymerization using nonionic plastic crystalline electrolyte medium. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 429–432 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee Y. W., Shin W. K. & Kim D. W. Cycling performance of lithium-ion polymer batteries assembled using in-situ chemical cross-linking without a free radical initiator. Solid State Ionics 255, 6–12 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  21. Zheng J. et al. Cross-linking copolymers of acrylates’ gel electrolytes with high conductivity for lithium-ion batteries. J. Solid State Electrochem. 18, 2013–2018 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  22. Srivastava S., Schaefer J. L., Yang Z., Tu Z. & Archer L. A. 25th Anniversary article: polymer-particle composites: phase stability and applications in electrochemical energy storage. Adv. Mater. 26, 201–234 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Croce F., Appetecchi G. B., Persi L. & Scrosati B. Nanocomposite polymer electrolytes for lithium batteries. Nature 394, 456–458 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  24. Han H. W., Liu W., Zhang J. & Zhao X. Z. A hybrid poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(vinylidene fluoride)/TiO2 nanoparticle solid-state redox electrolyte for dye-sensitized nanocrystalline solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 15, 1940–1944 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  25. Arico A. S., Bruce P., Scrosati B., Tarascon J.-M. & van Schalkwijk W. Nanostructured materials for advanced energy conversion and storage devices. Nature Mater 4, 366–377 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Das S. K., Mandal S. S. & Bhattacharyya A. J. Ionic conductivity, mechanical strength and Li-ion battery performance of mono-functional and bi-functional (“Janus”) “soggy sand” electrolytes. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 1391–1399 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhou D., Fan L.-Z., Fan H. & Shi Q. Electrochemical performance of trimethylolpropane trimethylacrylate-based gel polymer electrolyte prepared by in situ thermal polymerization. Electrochim. Acta 89, 334–338 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  28. Huang L.-Y., Shih Y.-C., Wang S.-H., Kuo P.-L. & Teng H. Gel electrolytes based on an ether-abundant polymeric framework for high-rate and long-cycle-life lithium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 10492–10501 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhou D. et al. Investigation of cyano resin-based gel polymer electrolyte: in situ gelation mechanism and electrode-electrolyte interfacial fabrication in lithium-ion battery. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 20059–20066 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  30. Shin W.-K. et al. Cycling performance of lithium-ion polymer cells assembled with a cross-linked composite polymer electrolyte using a fibrous polyacrylonitrile membrane and vinyl-functionalized SiO2 nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 12163–12170 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  31. Nandiyanto A. B. D., Kim S.-G., Iskandar F. & Okuyama K. Synthesis of spherical mesoporous silica nanoparticles with nanometer-size controllable pores and outer diameters. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 120, 447–453 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  32. Sing K. S. W. et al. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure Appl. Chem. 57, 603–619 (1985). [Google Scholar]
  33. Armatas G. S., Salmas C. E., Louloudi M., Androutsopoulos G. P. & Pomonis P. J. Relationships among pore size, connectivity, dimensionality of capillary condensation, and pore structure tortuosity of functionalized mesoporous silica. Langmuir 19, 3128–3136 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  34. Tanev P. T. & Pinnavaia T. J. Mesoporous silica molecular sieves prepared by ionic and neutral surfactant templating:  a comparison of physical properties. Chem. Mater. 8, 2068–2079 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang D. et al. Electrospun polyacrylonitrile nanocomposite fibers reinforced with Fe3O4 nanoparticles: fabrication and property analysis. Polymer 50, 4189–4198 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  36. De Haan J. W., van den Bogaert H. M., Ponjeé J. J. & van de Ven L. J. M. Characterization of modified silica powders by fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and cross-polarization magic angle spinning NMR. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 110, 591–600 (1986). [Google Scholar]
  37. Nassar E. et al. Spherical hybrid silica particles modified by methacrylate groups. J. Sol Gel Sci. Technol. 43, 21–26 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  38. Stojanovic D. et al. Preparation of MEMO silane-coated SiO2 nanoparticles under high pressure of carbon dioxide and ethanol. J. Supercrit. Fluids 52, 276–284 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  39. Bai Y. et al. The kinetics of Li-ion deintercalation in the Li-rich layered Li1.12[Ni0.5Co0.2Mn0.3]0.89O2 studied by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and galvanostatic intermittent titration technique. Electrochim. Acta 109, 355–364 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  40. Liu T., Garsuch A., Chesneau F. & Lucht B. L. Surface phenomena of high energy Li(Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3)O2/graphite cells at high temperature and high cutoff voltages. J. Power Sources 269, 920–926 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  41. Amatucci G. G., Tarascon J. M. & Klein L. C. Cobalt dissolution in LiCoO2-based non-aqueous rechargeable batteries. Solid State Ionics 83, 167–173 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  42. Woo S.-U. et al. Improvement of electrochemical performances of Li[Ni0.8Co0.1Mn0.1]O2 cathode materials by fluorine substitution. J. Electrochem. Soc. 154, A649–A655 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  43. Cho W. et al. Improved electrochemical and thermal properties of nickel rich LiNi0.6Co0.2Mn0.2O2 cathode materials by SiO2 coating. J. Power Sources 282, 45–50 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  44. Gellermann C., Storch W. & Wolter H. Synthesis and characterization of the organic surface modifications of monodisperse colloidal silica. J. Sol Gel Sci. Technol. 8, 173–176 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhao J., Jo S. G. & Kim D. W. Photovoltaic performance of dye-sensitized solar cells assembled with electrospun polyacrylonitrile/silica-based fibrous composite membranes. Electrochim. Acta 142, 261–267 (2014). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep26332-s1.pdf (224.8KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES