Skip to main content
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine logoLink to BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
. 2016 May 18;16:131. doi: 10.1186/s12906-016-1122-0

Screening North American plant extracts in vitro against Trypanosoma brucei for discovery of new antitrypanosomal drug leads

Surendra Jain 1,2, Melissa Jacob 1, Larry Walker 1,2, Babu Tekwani 1,2,
PMCID: PMC4870785  PMID: 27193901

Abstract

Background

Human African Trypanosomiasis (HAT) is a protozoan parasitic disease caused by Trypanosoma brucei. The disease is endemic in regions of sub-Saharan Africa, covering 36 countries and more than 60 million people at the risk. Only few drugs are available for the treatment of HAT. Current drugs suffer from severe toxicities and require intramuscular or intravenous administrations. The situation is further aggravated due to the emergence of drug resistance. There is an urgent need of new drugs that are effective orally against both stages of HAT. Natural products offer an unmatched source for bioactive molecules with new chemotypes.

Methods

The extracts prepared from 522 plants collected from various parts of the North America were screened in vitro against blood stage trypamastigote forms of T. brucei. Active extracts were further screened at concentrations ranging from 10 to 0.4 μg/mL. Active extracts were also investigated for toxicity in Differentiated THP1 cells at 10 μg/mL concentration. The results were computed for dose–response analysis and determination of IC50/IC90 values.

Results

A significant number (150) of extracts showed >90 % inhibition of growth of trypomastigote blood forms of T. brucei in primary screening at 20 μg/mL concentration. The active extracts were further investigated for dose–response inhibition of T. brucei growth. The antitrypansomal activity of 125 plant extracts was confirmed with IC50 < 10 μg/mL. None of these active extracts showed toxicity against differentiated THP1 cells. Eight plants extracts namely, Alnus rubra, Hoita macrostachya, Sabal minor, Syzygium aqueum, Hamamelis virginiana, Coccoloba pubescens, Rhus integrifolia and Nuphar luteum were identified as highly potent antitrypanosomal extracts with IC50 values <1 μg/mL.

Conclusions

Limited phytochemical and pharmacological reports are available for the lead plant extracts with potent antitrypanosomal activity. Follow up evaluation of these plant extracts is likely to yield new antitrypanosomal drug-leads or alternate medicines for treatment of HAT.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12906-016-1122-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords: Trypanosoma brucei, Natural products, Human African trypanosomiasis, North American plants

Background

Human African trypanosomiasis (HAT), also known as sleeping sickness, is caused by infection with Trypanosoma brucei. HAT is almost always fatal, if untreated or inadequately treated, and is a substantial cause of both mortality and morbidity in affected regions. Infection with T. brucei also has a substantial effect on livestock production [1]. The human disease occurs in two forms, depending on the subspecies of the trypanosome involved. Trypanosoma brucei gambiense causes a chronic infection that may persist for months or even years without major signs or symptoms of the disease. Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense causes an acute infection [2], where signs and symptoms of the disease are observed a few weeks after the infective bite. The acute form develops rapidly, soon invading the central nervous system [3]. Currently, only four drugs are registered for the treatment of the HAT, which were developed several years ago. All drugs are toxic and require cumbersome treatment schedules. Pentamidine is used to treat the first stage of T. brucei gambiense infection [4]. Suramin is used to treat the first stage of T. brucei rhodesiense infection [4]. Intravenous melarsoprol is used in the second stage of both forms of the disease [5]. On average, 5 % of patients treated with melarsoprol have a fatal serious adverse event [6]. Eflornithine is used in the second stage of T. b. gambiense infection. No new chemical agents have been approved since eflornithine in 1990. A new protocol for the treatment of late-stage T. brucei gambiense that uses the combination nifurtomox/eflornithine (NECT) was recently shown to have better safety and efficacy than eflornithine alone, while being easier to administer [7]. This breakthrough represents the only new therapy for HAT since the approval of eflornithine. Toxicity and suboptimal efficacy of currently available HAT drugs, the growing problem of drug resistance to pentamidine and melarsoprol [8, 9] and severely depleted antitypanosomal drug discovery pipeline necessitate the discovery of new antitrypanosomal drugs with better efficacy and safety profiles. Natural products remain an unmatched source of drugs leads with diverse and novel chemotypes. About 70 % of the currently available drugs have their origin from natural products, mainly from plants. Screening of natural products plant extracts will promise potential for discovery of new drug leads [10]. The North American plants have shown significant medicinal values. However, the plants from this region of the world have not been explored earlier for new antiparasitic and antiprotozoal drug discovery. This study presents the results on screenings of the extracts prepared from the plants collected from this region for discovery of new natural products drug-leads and alternate medicines from traditional natural products sources for treatment of human African trypanosomiasis. Trypansoma brucei brucei strain 427 a non-human sub specie, which has been extensively used for molecular and biochemical investigations on trypanosomes and compounds screening, was employed for the screening [11, 12].

Methods

Plant collection

Botanists at the Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, Missouri (MOBOT) collected the plants the plants from different parts of North America, under a cooperative scientific agreement with the National Center for Natural Products Research. The information on NPID (a unique identification number), sample name, code, genus, species, family, source, common name, plant part, geographical location, collector and collector’s number are given in the supplement Table (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Extraction procedure

Bulk plant samples are dried and frozen in the field and freeze dried at the University of Mississippi before extraction. The freeze-dried plant materials were extracted with Dionex ASE 300. Extraction was done in 95 % ethanol. Each sample was placed in a specific ASE cell and extracted at 1500 psi, at 40 °C for 3 times with 10 min static time/extraction. ASE cells were purged for 120 s. After extraction the extracts were dried and dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 20 mg/mL.

Culture maintenance

Blood stage forms of Trypanosoma brucei brucei (bloodstream form, Strain 427 obtained from Frederick S. Buckner, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA) was grown in IMDM medium supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum. The culture was maintained at 37 °C in 5 % CO2 incubator. THP1 cells obtained from ATCC were grown in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum. The culture was maintained at 37 °C in 5 % CO2 incubator.

Antitrypanosomal assay

A 2 days old culture of T. brucei brucei in the exponential phase was diluted with IMDM to 5000 parasites/mL. Maximum permissible limit of DMSO in the assay was 0.5 %. The assays were set up in clear 96 well microplates. For primary screening (Single concentration of 20 μg/mL in duplicate) extract dilutions (1 mg/mL) were prepared from the stock extracts (20 mg/mL) in IMDM medium. Each well received 4 μL of diluted extract sample and 196 μL of the culture volume (total culture volume 200 μl). The plates were incubated at 37 °C in 5 % CO2 for 48 h. Alamar blue (10 μl) (AbD Serotec, catalog number BUF012B) was added to each well and the plates were incubated further for overnight. Standard fluorescence was measured on a Fluostar Galaxy fluorometer (BMG LabTechnologies) at 544 nm excitation, 590 nm emission. Pentamidine and α-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) were tested as standard (Table 1). The extracts that have shown more than 90 % inhibition of T. brucei growth in primary screening were subjected to secondary screening for dose–response analysis. Active extracts were screened at concentrations ranging from 10 – 0.4 μg/mL. IC50 and IC90 values were computed from dose response growth inhibition curve by XLfit version 5.2.2.

Table 1.

In vitro antitrypanosomal activity of the most active plant extracts against Trypanosoma brucei

NPID Sample name Family Common name Plant part IC50 (μg/mL) IC90 (μg/mL)
81880 Alnus rubra Betulaceae Red alder BK 0.94 ± 0.58 1.95 ± 0.17
81890 Boykinia major Saxifragaceae Large Boykinia RT 2.82 ± 0.44 8.31 ± 1.50
81897 Juniperus communis Cupressaceae Juniper LF-ST 2.40 ± 0.44 6.66 ± 2.13
81908 Chrysolepis chrysophylla Fagaceae Golden chinquapin FL 2.89 ± 0.40 7.31 ± 1.57
81925 Rhododendron occidentale Ericaceae Western azalea LF 2.87 ± 0.43 6.88 ± 1.16
81940 Arctostaphylos viscida Ericaceae Whiteleaf manzanita, sticky manzanita LF 2.88 ± 0.21 5.96 ± 1.09
81953 Eriogonum umbellatum Polygonaceae Buckwheat LF-ST 2.79 ± 0.34 6.25 ± 1.94
82438 Eriogonum fisciculatum Polygonaceae California or Eastern Mojave buckwheat LF 2.68 ± 0.44 7.73 ± 2.33
82440 Rhus integrifolia Anacardiaceae Lemonade berry LF 2.97 ± 0.01 4.41 ± 0.29
82453 Hoita macrostachya Fabaceae Large leatherroot LF 0.48 ± 0.00 0.62 ± 0.00
82466 Lepechinia calycina Lamiaceae Pitcher sage; woodbalm LF 2.50 ± 0.05 5.04 ± 0.12
82467 Ribes speciosum Grossulariaceae Fuchsia-flowered gooseberry LF-ST-FL 2.95 ± 0.10 5.90 ± 0.08
82468 Salvia spathacea Lamiaceae Pitcher or hummingbird sage ST 1.13 ± 0.78 3.46 ± 0.34
82484 Sabal minor Arecaceae Bush palmetto FL 1.06 ± 0.44 2.07 ± 0.96
83334 Medinilla magnifica Melastomataceae Chandelier tree FL-FR 2.25 ± 1.16 7.89 ± 2.48
83345 Eucalyptus citriodora Myrtaceae Lemon-scented gum LF 2.91 ± 0.21 5.82 ± 0.04
83360 Acer rubrum Sapindaceae Red maple LF 2.88 ± 0.50 7.45 ± 0.70
84470 Ligustrum sinense Oleaceae Privet LF-FR 2.77 ± 0.40 4.41 ± 1.46
84516 Hamamelis virginiana Hamamelidaceae Witch hazel ST 2.54 ± 0.53 4.65 ± 3.92
84686 Lyonia fruticosa Ericaceae Coastal plain staggerbush ST 2.54 ± 0.71 4.65 ± 3.92
84709 Ribes montigenum Grossulariaceae Gooseberry-currant ST 1.94 ± 0.67 7.39 ± 2.74
84712 Quercus alba Fagaceae White oak BK 1.42 ± 0.30 7.53 ± 0.44
84715 Leea rubra Vitaceae West Indian holly, red leea ST 1.62 ± 0.32 4.50 ± 1.04
84720 Coccoloba pubescens Polygonaceae Grandleaf seagrape ST 0.83 ± 0.04 1.91 ± 0.16
84722 Rhus integrifolia Anacardiaceae Lemonade berry ST 0.50 ± 0.10 1.07 ± 0.33
84738 Nuphar luteum Nymphaeaceae Water lilly FR 0.42 ± 0.02 1.32 ± 0.11
131665 Difluoromethylornithine 5.07 ± 0.27 12.37 ± 0.96
103650 Pentamidine 0.002 ± 0.001 0.003 ± 0.001

(A complete list of plants screened is presented as supplement material –Additional file 1: Table S1 and Table S2) NPID- Natural Product Identification Details (accession number); Plant parts- BK- stem bark; LF- leaves; FL- flowers; ST- stem; FR- fruit; IC50 and IC90 values are mean ± SD

Cytotoxicity assay

The extracts were also tested for cytotoxicity against transformed human monocytic (THP1) cells. A 4 days’ old culture of THP1 cells in the experimental phase was diluted with RPMI medium to 2.5X 105 cells/mL. Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) was added to the culture at 25 ng/mL concentration for transformation of the cells to adherent macrophages [13]. The PMA treated THP1 cell culture was dispensed in 96 well plates with 200 μl culture (2.5X 105 cells/mL) in each well and plates were incubated at 37 °C in 5 % CO2 incubator for overnight. Extracts were diluted in separate plates (Daughter plates) in RPMI medium. The medium in plates with THP1 cells was replaced with fresh medium. The diluted plant extracts were added to these plates. The plates were placed again in CO2 incubator at 37 °C, 5 % CO2 for 48 h. After 48 h 10 μl of alamar blue solution was added to each well and the plates were incubated further for overnight. Standard fluorescence was measured on a fluorometer at 544 nm ex, 590 nm em. Cytotoxicity screening was done for active extracts, which have shown more than 90 % inhibition in primary T. brucei screening. None of the T. brucei active plant extracts have shown more than 50 % inhibition on differentiated THP1 cells at 10 μg/mL concentration.

Results and discussion

The primary screening for T. brucei was done for extracts prepared from 522 plants collected from various parts of the North America (Additional file 1: Table S1). A significantly high number (150 extracts) of extracts showed >90 % inhibition of growth and proliferation of trypomastigote forms of T. brucei at 20 μg/mL. Secondary screening was done for active extracts at concentrations ranging from 10 – 0.4 μg/mL (Additional file 1: Table S2) and we identified ten plants extracts with potent antitrypanosomal activity with IC50 values <2 μg/mL (Table 1). Antitrypanosomal activity of these plants extracts was selective as none of these were significantly active against Leishmania donovani, Plasmodium falciparum (unpublished data) and transformed THP1 human macrophage cells (Additional file 1: Table S2). Plant extracts, those having IC50 less than 2 μg/mL in antitrypanosomal assay were Alnus rubra (0.94 μg/mL), Hoita macrostachya (0.48 μg/mL), Salvia spathacea (1.13 μg/mL), Sabal minor (1.06 μg/mL), Syzygium aqueum (1.84 μg/mL), Rubus odoratus (1.95 μg/mL), Ribes montigenum (1.94 μg/mL), Quercus alba (1.42 μg/mL), Leea rubra (1.62 μg/mL), Coccoloba pubescens (0.83 μg/mL), Rhus integrifolia (0.50 μg/mL), and Nuphar luteum (0.42 μg/mL). Eight additional plant extracts with IC50 in the range of 2.0- 2.5 μg/mL in antitrypanosomal assay were Juniperus communis (2.40 μg/mL), Lepechinia calycina (2.50 μg/mL), Salix caroliniana (2.24 μg/mL), Arceuthobium occidentale (2.47 μg/mL), Medinilla magnifica (2.25 μg/mL), Acer rubrum (2.06 μg/mL), Pinus aristata (2.42 μg/mL), Hypericum hypericoides (2.28 μg/mL) also represent new antitrypanosomal leads (Additional file 1: Table S2).

The active extracts were investigated for reported phytochemical and pharmacological activities. Alnus rubra, the Red alder, is a deciduous broadleaf tree native to western North America. It is the largest species of alder in North America and one of the largest in the world, reaching heights of 20–35 m. Native Americans have used various plant parts of Alnus rubra medicinally as a purgative, an emetic, for aching bones, headaches, coughs, biliousness, stomach problems, scrofula sores, tuberculosis, asthma, and eczema, and as a general panacea [14]. Antifungal and antibiotic activities have also been reported in Alnus rubra [15, 16]. Diarylheptenone 1-(3′,4’-dihydroxyphenyl)-7-(4''-hydroxyphenyl)-4-hepten-3-one and 1,7-bis(P-hydroxyphenyl)-4-hepten-3-one were isolated from Alnus rubra bark and their structures elucidated by spectrometric techniques [17]. A few minor diarylheptanoid glycosides namely, diarylheptanoid (S)-1,7-bis-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-heptan-3-one-5-O-beta-D-xylopyranoside, and two known compounds, 1,7-bis-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-heptan-3-one-5-O-beta-D-glucopyranoside and platyphylloside were also isolated from Alnus rubra bark [18]. Alnus rubra extract is a novel antitrypanosomal lead. Hoita macrostachya is a species of legume known by the common name Large Leather Root. It is native to California and Baja California where it can be found in moist areas of a number of habitat types. This is a hairy, glandular perennial herb producing a tall, branching stem approaching two meters in maximum height. The potent antitrypanosomal activity reported herein is the first pharmacological activity reported in this plant. No phytochemical data are available on Hoita macrostachya. Therefore, this also represents a novel antitrypanosomal lead. Sabal minor (Arecaceae), commonly known as the Dwarf Palmetto or Bush palmetto, is one of about 14 species of Sabal palmetto palms. Native to the southeastern United States, ranging from Florida north to eastern North Carolina, and west to eastern Oklahoma and eastern Texas. Although it is mainly found in the southern states, it is one of the only palms that can withstand somewhat cooler temperatures, and has been cultivated in North and South Central Pennsylvania. This is the first report regarding antitrypanosomal activity in this plant. No phytochemical data are available on Sabal minor. Ribes montigenum plant commonly known as mountain gooseberry, alpine prickly currant, and gooseberry currant is native to Western North America (British Columbia to California to New Mexico). No previous phytochemical or pharmacological results are reported in this plant. Coccoloba pubescens (Grandleaf Seagrape; syn. C. grandifolia, also called “Eve’s Umbrella”) is a species of Coccoloba native to coastal regions of the Caribbean, on Antigua, Barbados, Barbuda, Dominica, Hispaniola, Martinique, Montserrat, and Puerto Rico. No phytochemical or pharmacological data are reported in this plant. Rhus integrifolia, also known as Lemonade Berry or Lemonade Sumac is a shrub to small tree. It is native to the Transverse and Peninsular Ranges and the South Coast regions of Southern California. This extends from Santa Barbara County and the Channel Islands to San Diego County and extending into north-central Pacific coastal Baja California and its offshore islands such as Cedros Island. This is the first report on any pharmacological activity in this plant. No phytochemical data are available on Rhus integrifolia. Nuphar lutea, the spatterdock, also known as yellow water-lily, cow lily, or yellow pond-lily, is an aquatic plant of the family Nymphaeaceae, native to Eurasia and North America. It grows in eutrophic freshwater beds, with its roots fixed into the ground and its leaves floating on the water’s surface. Strong inhibition of NFkappaB activity was found in extracts of leaf and rhizome from Nuphar lutea L. SM. (Nuphar). The inhibitory action was narrowed down to a mixture of thionupharidines and/or thionuphlutidines [19]. Antileishmanial activity has been reported in partially purified alkaloid fraction (NUP) of Nuphar lutea and dimeric sesquiterpene thioalkaloids were identified as the major constituents of the mixture [20]. The Nuphar lutea was identified as the most active antitrypanosomal plant extract with IC50 0.42 μg/mL Few additional plant extracts showed activity (IC50) in the range of 2–10 μg/mL. Antioxidant activity has been reported in extracts from Rhus hirta [21], a different species of Rhus integrifolia (T. brucei IC50- 2.97 μg/mL), Juniperus communis [22] (T. brucei IC50- 2.40 μg/mL) Sanguisorba officinalis [23] (T. brucei IC50 3.56 μg/mL), Syzygium malaccense [24] (T. brucei IC50 2.76 μg/mL) and Syzygium aqueum [25] (T. brucei IC50 1.84 μg/mL). Eucalyptus citriodora [26] (T. brucei IC50 3.34 μg/mL), Acer rubrum [27] (T. brucei IC50 2.07 μg/mL), Yucca glauca [28] (T. brucei IC50 3.56 μg/mL) plants have also been reported for anticancer activity. Antiviral activity is reported in Chamaecrista nictitans [29] (T. brucei IC50 5.76 μg/mL). Antimicrobial activity is reported in Liriodendron tulipifera [30] (T. brucei IC50 4.75 μg/mL) and Caesalpinia pulcherrima [31] (T. brucei IC50 4.76 μg/mL). Anthelminthic activity is reported in Quercus alba [32] (T. brucei IC50 1.42 μg/mL).

Conclusions

In conclusion, the in vitro screening of 522 extracts, prepared from plants collected from different parts of North America, against blood stage form of T. brucei has identified several plants extracts with potent antitrypanosomal activity and no cytotoxicity against THP1 cells. The active plants extracts namely, Alnus rubra, Hoita macrostachya, Salvia spathacea, Sabal minor, Ribes montigenum, Quercus alba, Leea rubra, Coccoloba pubescens, Rhus integrifolia and Nuphar luteum represent new antitrypanosomal leads. Most of the leadplant extracts have very limited phytochemical and pharmacological data available. Further follow up studies with these extracts are likely to provide novel compounds as potential antitrypanosomal drug leads.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Availability of data and materials

All the data have been included in the supplementary data. Additional data, if required, can be made available on request. The plant material listed in manuscript can be shared, if available, on a mutually agreed material transfer agreements.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the National Center for Natural Products Research (NCNPR), Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Scientific cooperative agreement with USDA- Agricultural Services. The Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, Missouri (MOBOT) collected the plants reported in this paper through a cooperative scientific agreement with the NCNPR.

The authors are thankful to the staff of NCNPR repository for extraction and data-base support. The authors are also thankful to the MOBOT for plant material under a cooperative scientific agreement with the NCNPR.

Funding

This study has been supported by United States Department of Agriculture –Agricultural Research Services (USDA-ARS) Cooperative scientific agreement # 58-6408-2-0009.

Abbreviations

DFMO

difluoromethyl ornithine

HAT

human african trypanosomiasis

IC50

concentration of extract producing 50 % inhibition in growth compared to controls

IC90

concentration of extract producing 90 % inhibition in growth compared to controls

MOBOT

Missouri Botanical Garden

NECT

nifurtomox/eflornithine combination

NPID

natural product identification details

PMA

phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate

THP1

human acute monocytic leukemia cells

Additional file

Additional file 1: (370.9KB, pdf)

Supplemental data - Table S1 and Table S2. (PDF 370 kb)

Footnotes

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

All the authors were involved in the study design and writing the manuscript. SJ performed the in vitro screening. SJ and BLT compiled and analyzed the results. MJ managed the date-base for plants, plants extracts and in vitro screening results. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  • 1.World Health O. Control and surveillance of human African trypanosomiasis. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2013;984:1–237. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brun R, Blum J, Chappuis F, Burri C. Human African trypanosomiasis. Lancet. 2010;375(9709):148–59. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60829-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kennedy PG. Clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of human African trypanosomiasis (sleeping sickness) Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(2):186–94. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70296-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Burri C. Chemotherapy against human African trypanosomiasis: is there a road to success? Parasitology. 2010;137(14):1987–94. doi: 10.1017/S0031182010001137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lutje V, Seixas J, Kennedy A. Chemotherapy for second-stage human African trypanosomiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;6:CD006201. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006201.pub3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Control and surveillance of African trypanosomiasis Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1998;881:I–VI. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Priotto G, Kasparian S, Mutombo W, Ngouama D, Ghorashian S, Arnold U, Ghabri S, Baudin E, Buard V, Kazadi-Kyanza S, et al. Nifurtimox-eflornithine combination therapy for second-stage African Trypanosoma brucei gambiense trypanosomiasis: a multicentre, randomised, phase III, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9683):56–64. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61117-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gehrig S, Efferth T. Development of drug resistance in Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense and Trypanosoma brucei gambiense. Treatment of human African trypanosomiasis with natural products (Review) Int J Mol Med. 2008;22(4):411–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Baker N, de Koning HP, Maser P, Horn D. Drug resistance in African trypanosomiasis: the melarsoprol and pentamidine story. Trends Parasitol. 2013;29(3):110–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2012.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rollinger JM, Langer T, Stuppner H. Strategies for efficient lead structure discovery from natural products. Curr Med Chem. 2006;13(13):1491–507. doi: 10.2174/092986706777442075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sykes ML, Baell JB, Kaiser M, Chatelain E, Moawad SR, Ganame D, Ioset JR, Avery VM. Identification of compounds with anti-proliferative activity against Trypanosoma brucei brucei strain 427 by a whole cell viability based HTS campaign. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(11) doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cross GA, Kim HS, Wickstead B. Capturing the variant surface glycoprotein repertoire (the VSGnome) of Trypanosoma brucei Lister 427. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2014;195(1):59–73. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2014.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jain SK, Sahu R, Walker LA, Tekwani BL. A parasite rescue and transformation assay for antileishmanial screening against intracellular Leishmania donovani amastigotes in THP1 human acute monocytic leukemia cell line. J Vis Exp. 2012;70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 14.Moerman DE. The medicinal flora of Native North America: an analysis. J Ethnopharmacol. 1991;31(1):1–42. doi: 10.1016/0378-8741(91)90141-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.McCutcheon AR, Ellis SM, Hancock RE, Towers GH. Antibiotic screening of medicinal plants of the British Columbian native peoples. J Ethnopharmacol. 1992;37(3):213–23. doi: 10.1016/0378-8741(92)90036-Q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McCutcheon AR, Ellis SM, Hancock RE, Towers GH. Antifungal screening of medicinal plants of British Columbian native peoples. J Ethnopharmacol. 1994;44(3):157–69. doi: 10.1016/0378-8741(94)01183-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen J, Karchesy JJ, Gonzalez-Laredo RF. Phenolic diarylheptenones from Alnus rubra bark. Planta Med. 1998;64(1):74–5. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-957372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chen J, Gonzalez-Laredo RF, Karchesy JJ. Minor diarylheptanoid glycosides of Alnus rubra bark. Phytochemistry. 2000;53(8):971–3. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(99)00523-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ozer J, Eisner N, Ostrozhenkova E, Bacher A, Eisenreich W, Benharroch D, Golan-Goldhirsh A, Gopas J. Nuphar lutea thioalkaloids inhibit the nuclear factor kappaB pathway, potentiate apoptosis and are synergistic with cisplatin and etoposide. Cancer Biol Ther. 2009;8(19):1860–8. doi: 10.4161/cbt.8.19.9567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ozer L, El-On J, Golan-Goldhirsh A, Gopas J. Leishmania major: anti-leishmanial activity of Nuphar lutea extract mediated by the activation of transcription factor NF-kappaB. Exp Parasitol. 2010;126(4):510–6. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2010.05.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wu T, McCallum JL, Wang S, Liu R, Zhu H, Tsao R. Evaluation of antioxidant activities and chemical characterisation of staghorn sumac fruit (Rhus hirta L.) Food Chem. 2013;138(2–3):1333–40. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.10.086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yesilbag D, Cengiz SS, Cetin I, Meral Y, Biricik H. Influence of juniper (Juniperus communis) oil on growth performance and meat quality as a natural antioxidant in quail diets. Br Poult Sci. 2014;55(4):495–500. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2014.932335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang S, Liu X, Zhang ZL, He L, Wang Z, Wang GS. Isolation and identification of the phenolic compounds from the roots of Sanguisorba officinalis L. and their antioxidant activities. Molecules. 2012;17(12):13917–22. doi: 10.3390/molecules171213917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Savitha RC, Padmavathy S, Sundhararajan A. Invitro antioxidant activities on leaf extracts of syzygium malaccense (L.) merr and perry. Anc Sci Life. 2011;30(4):110–3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Osman H, Rahim AA, Isa NM, Bakhir NM. Antioxidant activity and phenolic content of Paederia foetida and Syzygium aqueum. Molecules. 2009;14(3):970–8. doi: 10.3390/molecules14030970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shen KH, Chen ZT, Duh PD. Cytotoxic effect of eucalyptus citriodora resin on human hepatoma HepG2 cells. Am J Chin Med. 2012;40(2):399–413. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X12500310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gonzalez-Sarrias A, Li L, Seeram NP. Effects of maple (Acer) plant part extracts on proliferation, apoptosis and cell cycle arrest of human tumorigenic and non-tumorigenic colon cells. Phytother Res. 2012;26(7):995–1002. doi: 10.1002/ptr.3677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ali MS, Sharma GC, Asplund RO, Nevins MP, Garb S. Isolation of antitumor polysaccharide fractions from Yucca glauca Nutt. (Lilliaceae) Growth. 1978;42(2):213–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Herrero Uribe L, Chaves Olarte E, Tamayo Castillo G. In vitro antiviral activity of Chamaecrista nictitans (Fabaceae) against herpes simplex virus: biological characterization of mechanisms of action. Rev Biol Trop. 2004;52(3):807–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hufford CD, Funderburk MJ, Morgan JM, Robertson LW. Two antimicrobial alkaloids from heartwood of Liriodendron tulipifera L. J Pharm Sci. 1975;64(5):789–92. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600640512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sudhakar M, Rao Ch V, Rao PM, Raju DB, Venkateswarlu Y. Antimicrobial activity of Caesalpinia pulcherrima, Euphorbia hirta and Asystasia gangeticum. Fitoterapia. 2006;77(5):378–80. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2006.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Katiki LM, Ferreira JF, Gonzalez JM, Zajac AM, Lindsay DS, Chagas AC, Amarante AF. Anthelmintic effect of plant extracts containing condensed and hydrolyzable tannins on Caenorhabditis elegans, and their antioxidant capacity. Vet Parasitol. 2013;192(1–3):218–27. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.09.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All the data have been included in the supplementary data. Additional data, if required, can be made available on request. The plant material listed in manuscript can be shared, if available, on a mutually agreed material transfer agreements.


Articles from BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES