ABSTRACT
Strigolactones (SLs) are a group of terpenoid lactones found in plants that regulate diverse developmental phenomena. SLs are thought to be involved in the maintenance of phosphate homeostasis. In addition, SL signaling is required for the regulation of shoot branching by nitrogen supply in Arabidopsis. In this study, we evaluated the effects of SLs on nitrogen deficient-inducing phenomena (leaf senescence and reduction of plant weight) in Arabidopsis. SL-biosynthesis (max1-1) and SL-insensitive (atd14-1) mutants showed altered responses to nitrogen deficient in comparison with wild-type (WT) plants. Nitrogen deficient conditions led to alterations in the expression levels of SL biosynthesis genes (MAX3 and MAX4). These results indicate that SLs could be key mediators of plant growth response to nitrogen supply.
KEYWORDS: Arabidopsis, nitrogen deficient, stress condition, strigolactone
Strigolactones (SLs) are a new group of plant hormones that regulate various developmental processes.1-3 The genetic analysis of a series of branching mutants in Arabidopsis, rice, petunia, and pea led to proposal of the SL biosynthetic and signaling pathways. The biosynthesis of SLs is mediated by a carotenoid isomerase (D27), 2 carotenoid cleavage dioxygenases (CCD7/MAX3 and CCD8/MAX4), and cytochrome P450 (CYP711A subfamily).4,5 D27 catalyzes the isomerization at C-9 position of all-trans-β-carotene. CCD7 and CCD8 convert 9-cis-β-carotene to carlactone (CL) via sequential reaction.6,7 Recently, it was reported that Os01g0700900 and Os01g0701400, which are members of the rice CYP711A subfamily, encode a CL oxidase and an ent-2′-epi-5-deoxystrigol-4-hydroxylase, respectively, and convert CL to orobanchol,8 whereas in Arabidopsis, CYP711A1 (AtMAX1) does not convert CL to SL but converts it to an SL-like chemical, carlactonoic acid.9 F-box protein/MAX2 and α/β hydrolase protein/D14 are involved in SL signal transduction,10-12 and mutants in these genes render plants SL-insensitive.
SLs also serve as rhizosphere communication signals between plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.13 This symbiotic relationship provides the fungus with carbohydrates produced by the plants and provides the plants with phosphate taken up by the fungi. Recent studies have suggested that SLs likely serve as signals that mediate responses to phosphate deficient in various plant species.14-17 In addition, the fact that SLs modulate the establishment of the symbiosis between nitrogen-fixing bacteria and legumes18-22 and their biosynthesis is regulated by environmental nitrogen concentration in some plant species,23 suggests the possible involvement of SLs in the nitrogen response. A recent study found that SL signaling is essential in root development in rice and shoot branching in Arabidopsis under low nitrogen condition.24,25 However, the effects of SL signaling on the other nitrogen deficient responses including reduction of plant growth and chlorophyll synthesis have not been investigated.
In this study, we evaluated the effect of SL signaling on nitrogen deficient responses. We found that SL-biosynthesis and SL-insensitive mutants showed altered responses to nitrogen deficient. Furthermore, variations in nitrogen concentrations altered the expression levels of SL biosynthesis genes. These results suggest a potential overlap between SL signaling and nitrogen deficient signaling pathways in Arabidopsis.
Nitrogen deficient affects anthocyanin accumulation, plant growth, and leaf senescence.26 Previously, it was shown that SL treatment in WT seedlings induced anthocyanin accumulation, reduction of plant growth and promotion of leaf senescence.16,17, In addition, we have previously shown that SL signaling regulates nitrogen-deficient-induced anthocyanin accumulation.17 To clarify the role of SL signaling in the other nitrogen deficient responses, we estimated the effects of nitrogen deficient on plant weight. We measured the plant weight of WT (Col-0), max1-1 (SL biosynthesis mutant),11 and atd14-1 (SL insensitive mutant)12 under nitrogen-limited conditions. Control medium used for the assay contained 5 mM KNO3, 1 mM KH2PO4, 1 mM MgSO4, 1.5 mM Ca(NO3)2, 1 mM NH4Cl, 50 µM Fe-EDTA, 46 µM HBO3, 10 µM MnSO4, 0.77 µM ZnSO4, 0.32 µM CuSO4, 0.58 µM Na2MoO4, 0.25 µM NH4VO3, 3 mM MES, 0.75% sucrose, and 0.7% agar (pH 5.7).27 Nitrogen deficient medium (pH 5.7) was prepared by partially replacing KNO3, Ca(NO3)2, and NH4Cl in the control medium with KCl, CaCl2, and NaCl, respectively. Plants grown on control medium for 3 days were transferred onto fresh media supplemented with or without nitrogen. After 3 weeks, plant weight was measured by using an AT261 Delta Range Analytical Balance (Mettler Toledo, Switzerland). The ratio of the weight of plants grown on nutrient-limited conditions to that grown on control medium was calculated.
Although plant growth was also inhibited in a nitrogen concentration-dependent manner in max1-1 and atd14-1 mutants, the ratio of plant weight under nitrogen-limited conditions tended to increase in max1-1 and atd14-1 compared to WT (Fig. 1A). Especially, when the plants were grown on 1/5 N media, the ratio of plant weight was significantly increased in both max1-1 and atd14-1. Thus, nitrogen deficiency had a lower impact on the growth of max1-1 and atd14-1 mutants than WT seedlings. Based on this result, we used the 1/5 N medium as a nitrogen deficient medium for subsequent study. Under nitrogen-sufficient conditions (1 N), SL treatment significantly reduced the weight of WT plant, as previously demonstrated.17 On the other hand, max1-1 mutant also showed reduced weight by SL treatment, but the difference was not significant, whereas atd14-1 did not (Fig. 1B), suggesting that SLs regulate plant weight. Under nitrogen-deficient conditions, SL treatment significantly reduced plant weight in max1-1, but not in atd14-1. These results suggest that SL signaling is required for the growth defect under nitrogen-deficient conditions.
Figure 1.

Comparison of weights of WT, max1-1, and atd14-1 plants. (A) Ratio of plant weight of WT, max1-1, and atd14-1 seedlings grown on nitrogen-limited medium. The weight of WT, max1-1 and atd14-1 grown under 1 N condition are 41.9 ± 8.2, 43.1 ± 1.7 and 45.1 ± 2.0 mg/seedling, respectively. (B) Effect of GR24 (synthetic SL analog) on plant weight under 1 N and 1/5 N conditions. 5 µM GR24 was added to 1 N or 1/5 N media. The weight of WT, max1-1 and atd14-1 grown under 1 N condition are 40.9 ± 1.8, 51.1 ± 6.5 and 60.3 ± 4.6 mg/seedling, respectively. Data represent means ± SD of 4 biological replicates (each replicate contained 16 seedlings). * and ** indicate significant differences from WT seedlings (A), and 0 µM GR24 treatment (B) (Student's t-test, *:P < 0.05, **: P < 0.01). Black, white, and gray bars represent WT, max1-1, and atd14-1 plants, respectively.
Nitrogen deficient also accelerates the reduction of chlorophyll content, which is induced by leaf senescence. In addition, SLs regulate dark-induced leaf senescence.28 Based on this information, we measured the chlorophyll content in the leaves of WT and max1-1 and atd14-1 mutants under nitrogen-sufficient (1 N) and nitrogen-deficient (1/5 N) conditions to examine the effect of SL signaling on nitrogen–deficient–induced leaf senescence (Fig. 2). Plants grown on control medium for 7 days were transferred onto fresh media supplemented with or without nitrogen. After 1 week, chlorophyll was extracted from each sample in dimethylformamide. Absorbance values at 663.8 and 646.8 nm were measured using a DU530 spectrometer (Beckman Coulter). Chlorophyll content was estimated as described previously.29
Figure 2.

Comparison of chlorophyll content in WT, max1-1, and atd14-1 plants. 5 µM GR24 was added to 1 N or 1/5 N media. Data represent means ± SD of 4 biological replicates each replicate contained 16 seedlings). * and ** indicate significant differences from WT seedlings (Student's t-test, *: P < 0.05, **: P < 0.01). Black, white, and gray bars represent WT, max1-1, and atd14-1 plants, respectively.
When the seedlings were grown on 1 N medium, no differences were observed in the chlorophyll content in max1-1 and atd14-1 mutants as well as in WT, regardless of SL treatment. In contrast, under 1/5 N condition, the chlorophyll content in max1-1 and atd14-1 mutants was about 2-fold higher than that in WT (Fig. 2). In addition, SL treatment of max1-1 mutant induced the reduction of chlorophyll content to a level similar to that in WT under 1/5 N condition. Moreover, the chlorophyll content in atd14-1 mutant was not affected by SL treatment under this condition. These results suggest that SLs modulate chlorophyll content under nitrogen-deficient as well as under dark conditions.
SL biosynthesis is up-regulated by nitrogen deficiency in some plants.30,31 However, the effect of nitrogen deficient on SL biosynthesis in Arabidopsis has not been studied thus far. To examine this, we performed the expression analysis of SL biosynthesis genes in WT roots, using real-time RT-PCR. Plants grown on control medium for 7 days were transferred onto fresh media supplemented with or without nitrogen. After 2 weeks, total RNA was extracted from roots and cDNA synthesis was performed. qRT-PCR was performed on a Takara Thermal Cycler Dice Real Time System using a SYBR premix Ex Taq (Takara). Specific primers used for qRT-PCR are designed as follows: MAX1 (forward: 5′-GGCCCTATTTTCAGATTTCAG-3′, reverse: 5′-TGGTGAAGAAGAGGCCTTTC-3′), AtD27 (forward: 5′-TCGCGTAACTTTGACACCAAGC-3′, reverse: 5′-CGAGACTTTTGAAGGTGGAAATGC-3′), MAX3 (forward: 5′-GTGTATTTAAGATGCCACCGA-3′, reverse: 5′-CTTGAATTCCGAATCATACTCAC-3′), MAX4 (forward: 5′-GTTTTACCCGATGCTAGGATC-3′, reverse: 5′-TGATGCTGCACATATCCATCG-3′), and UBC (encoding ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, At5g25760) (forward: 5′-TAGCATTGATGGCTCATCCT-3′, reverse: 5′-GGCGAGGCGTGTATACATTT-3′). Expression of UBC was used as an internal standard.32
MAX3 and MAX4 transcripts were significantly upregulated under 1/5 N condition as compared with 1 N condition (Fig. 3). However, the transcript levels of the other SL biosynthesis genes (MAX1 and D27) were not up-regulated under 1/5 N conditions. These data indicate that nitrogen-deficient treatment elevates the endogenous levels of SL via the up-regulation of the levels of the specific SL biosynthesis genes, MAX3 and MAX4. As shown in Fig. 1B and Fig. 2, SL treatment of WT seedlings did not result in reductions of plant weight and chlorophyll content under 1/5 N condition. Nitrogen-deficient condition enhanced the expression levels of SL biosynthesis genes, suggesting that endogenous SL levels were increased in WT seedlings (Fig. 3).30,31 These results suggest that nitrogen deficient up-regulates the endogenous levels of CL and its metabolites (carlactonoic acid, its methyl ester and SLs), and elevated levels of these chemicals partially induce the nitrogen deficient responses.
Figure 3.

Expression analysis of SL biosynthesis and signaling genes. Roots of 3-week-old Arabidopsis seedlings were used for expression analysis of SL biosynthesis and signaling genes. The expression level of each transcript was normalized with UBC and is displayed relative to the expression level in plant grown on the 1N condition (= 1). Data represent means ± SD of 3 biological replicates. ** indicates significant differences from the expression of plants grown on 1 N condition (Student's t-test, **: P < 0.01).
To clarify the role of SL signaling in nitrogen-deficient response, we examined morphological changes in both SL biosynthesis and signaling mutants under nitrogen-sufficient and nitrogen-deficient conditions. Under nitrogen-deficient conditions, the deficiencies in SL biosynthesis and signaling repressed the reductions of plant weight and chlorophyll content, which are responses indicative of nitrogen deficiency. In addition, we have previously shown that SLs modulate anthocyanin accumulation under nitrogen-limited conditions.17 Furthermore, in the present study, we found that nitrogen deficiency enhanced the expression levels of some SL biosynthesis genes. Our results indicate that SL signaling is involved in multiple responses to nitrogen as well as phosphate deficiency.
Disclosure of potential conflict of interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by the grants from the Kato memorial Bioscience Foundation (S. I.); and the Agricultural Chemical Research Foundation (S.I.)
References
- 1.Gomez-Roldan V, Fermas S, Brewer PB, Puech-Pagès V, Dun EA, Pillot JP, Letisse F, Matusova R, Danoun S, Portais JC, et al.. Strigolactone inhibition of shoot branching. Nature 2008; 455:189-94; PMID:18690209; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nature07271 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Umehara M, Hanada A, Yoshida S, Akiyama K, Arite T, Takeda-Kamiya N, Magome H, Kamiya Y, Shirasu K, Yoneyama K, et al.. Inhibition of shoot branching by new terpenoid plant hormones. Nature 2008; 455:195-200; PMID:18690207; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nature07272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Seto Y, Kameoka H, Yamaguchi S, Kyozuka J. Recent advances in strigolactone research: chemical and biological aspects. Plant Cell Physiol 2012; 53:1843-53; PMID:23054391; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/pcp/pcs142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Booker J, Auldridge M, Wills S, McCarty D, Klee H, Leyser O. MAX3/CCD7 is a carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase required for the synthesis of a novel plant signaling molecule. Curr Biol 2004; 14:1232-8; PMID:15268852; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Booker J, Sieberer T, Wright W, Williamson L, Willett B, Stirnberg P, Turnbull C, Srinivasan M, Goddard P, Leyser O. MAX1 encodes a cytochrome P450 family member that acts downstream of MAX3/4 to produce a carotenoid-derived branch-inhibiting hormone. Dev Cell 2005; 8:443-9; PMID:15737939; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.01.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Alder A, Jamil M, Marzorati M, Bruno M, Vermathen M, Bigler P, Ghisla S, Bouwmeester H, Beyer P, Al-Babili S. The path from β-carotene to carlactone, a strigolactone-like plant hormone. Science 2012; 335:1348-51; PMID:22422982; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1218094 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Waters MT, Brewer PB, Bussell JD, Smith SM, Beveridge CA. The Arabidopsis ortholog of rice DWARF27 acts upstream of MAX1 in the control of plant development by strigolactones. Plant Physiol 2012; 159:1073-85; PMID:22623516; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1104/pp.112.196253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhang Y, van Dijk AD, Scaffidi A, Flematti GR, Hofmann M, Charnikhova T, Verstappen F, Hepworth J, van der Krol S, Leyser O, et al.. Rice cytochrome P450 MAX1 homologs catalyze distinct steps in strigolactone biosynthesis. Nat Chem Biol 2014; 10(12):1028-33; PMID:25344813 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Abe S, Sado A, Tanaka K, Kisugi T, Asami K, Ota S, Kim HI, Yoneyama K, Xie X, Ohnishi T, et al.. Carlactone is converted to carlactonoic acid by MAX1 in Arabidopsis and its methyl ester can directly interact with AtD14 in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111:18084-9; PMID:25425668; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.1410801111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Woo HR, Chung KM, Park JH, Oh SA, Ahn T, Hong SH, Jang SK, Nam HG. ORE9, an F-box protein that regulates leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2001; 13:1779-90; PMID:11487692; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1105/tpc.13.8.1779 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Stirnberg P, van De Sande K, Leyser HM. MAX1 and MAX2 control shoot lateral branching in Arabidopsis. Development 2002; 129:1131-41; PMID:11874909 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Waters MT, Nelson DC, Scaffidi A, Flematti GR, Sun YK, Dixon KW, Smith SM. Specialisation within the DWARF14 protein family confers distinct responses to karrikins and strigolactones in Arabidopsis. Development 2012; 139:1285-95; PMID:22357928; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1242/dev.074567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Akiyama K, Matsuzaki K, Hayashi H. Plant sesquiterpenes induce hyphal branching in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Nature 2005; 435:824-7; PMID:15944706; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nature03608 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Umehara M, Hanada A, Magome H, Takeda-Kamiya N, Yamaguchi S. Contribution of strigolactones to the inhibition of tiller bud outgrowth under phosphate deficiency in rice. Plant Cell Physiol 2010; 51:1118-26; PMID:20542891; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/pcp/pcq084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mayzlish-Gati E, De-Cuyper C, Goormachtig S, Beeckman T, Vuylsteke M, Brewer PB, Beveridge CA, Yermiyahu U, Kaplan Y, Enzer Y, et al.. Strigolactones are involved in root response to low phosphate conditions in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2012; 160:1329-41; PMID:22968830; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1104/pp.112.202358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yamada Y, Furusawa S, Nagasaka S, Shimomura K, Yamaguchi S, Umehara M. Strigolactone signaling regulates rice leaf senescence in response to a phosphate deficiency. Planta 2014; 240:399-408; PMID:24888863; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s00425-014-2096-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ito S, Nozoye T, Sasaki E, Imai M, Shiwa Y, Shibata-Hatta M, Ishige T, Fukui K, Ito K, Nakanishi H, et al.. Strigolactone regulates anthocyanin accumulation, acid phosphatases production and plant growth under low phosphate condition in Arabidopsis. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0119724; PMID:25793732; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0119724 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Liu W, Kohlen W, Lillo A, Op den Camp R, Ivanov S, Hartog M, Limpens E, Jamil M, Smaczniak C, Kaufmann K, et al.. Strigolactone biosynthesis in Medicago truncatula and rice requires the symbiotic GRAS-type transcription factors NSP1 and NSP2. Plant Cell 2011; 23:3853-65; PMID:22039214; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1105/tpc.111.089771 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Foo E, Yoneyama K, Hugill CJ, Quittenden LJ, Reid JB. Strigolactones and the regulation of pea symbioses in response to nitrate and phosphate deficiency. Mol Plant 2013; 6:76-87; PMID:23066094; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/mp/sss115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.De Cuyper C, Fromentin J, Yocgo RE, De Keyser A, Guillotin B, Kunert K, Boyer FD, Goormachtig S. From lateral root density to nodule number, the strigolactone analogue GR24 shapes the root architecture of Medicago truncatula. J Exp Bot 2015; 66:137-46; PMID:25371499; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/jxb/eru404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Soto MJ, Fernández-Aparicio M, Castellanos-Morales V, García-Garrido JM, Ocampo JA, Delgado MJ, et al.. First indications for the involvement of strigolatones on nodule formation in alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Soil Biol Biochem 2010; 42:383-5; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Foo E, Davies NW. Strigolactones promote nodulation in pea. Planta 2011; 234:1073-81; PMID:21927948; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s00425-011-1516-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Marzec M, Muszynska A, Gruszka D. The role of strigolactones in nutrient-stress responses in plants. Int J Mol Sci 2013; 14:9286-304; PMID:23629665; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3390/ijms14059286 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.de Jong M, George G, Ongaro V, Williamson L, Willetts B, Ljung K, McCulloch H1, Leyser O. Auxin and strigolactone signaling are required for modulation of Arabidopsis shoot branching by nitrogen supply. Plant Physiol 2014; 166:384-95; PMID:25059707; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1104/pp.114.242388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sun H, Tao J, Liu S, Huang S, Chen S, Xie X, Yoneyama K, Zhang Y, Xu G. Strigolactones are involved in phosphate- and nitrate-deficiency-induced root development and auxin transport in rice. J Exp Bot 2014; 65:6735-46; PMID:24596173; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/jxb/eru029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vidal EA, Gutiérrez RA. A systems view of nitrogen nutrient and metabolite responses in Arabidopsis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2008; 11:521-9; PMID:18775665; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Norén H, Svensson P, Andersson B. A convenient and versatile hydroponic cultivation system for Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiol Plant. 2004;121:343-8; PMID:Can't; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.0031-9317.2004.00350.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ueda H, Kusaba M. Strigolactone Regulates Leaf Senescence in Concert with Ethylene in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2015; 169:138-47; PMID:25979917; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1104/pp.15.00325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Porra RJ, Thompson WA, Kriedemann PE. Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta 1989; 975:384-94; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S0005-2728(89)80347-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yoneyama K, Xie X, Kisugi T, Nomura T. Nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization negatively affects strigolactone production and exudation in sorghum. Planta 2013; 238:885-94; PMID:23925853; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s00425-013-1943-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yoneyama K, Xie X, Kusumoto D, Sekimoto H, Sugimoto Y, Takeuchi Y. Nitrogen deficiency as well as phosphorus deficiency in sorghum promotes the production and exudation of 5-deoxystrigol, the host recognition signal for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and root parasites. Planta 2007; 227:125-32; PMID:17684758; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s00425-007-0600-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mashiguchi K, Sasaki E, Shimada Y, Nagae M, Ueno K, Nakano T, Yoneyama K, Suzuki Y, Asami T. Feedback-regulation of strigolactone biosynthetic genes and strigolactone-regulated genes in Arabidopsis. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2009; 73:2460-5; PMID:19897913; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1271/bbb.90443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
