Abstract
Strigolactones (SLs) and their derivatives were recently defined as novel phytohormones that orchestrate shoot and root growth. Levels of SLs, which are produced mainly by plant roots, increase under low nitrogen and phosphate levels to regulate plant responses. Here, we summarize recent work on SL biology by describing their role in the regulation of root development and hormonal crosstalk during root deve-lopment. SLs promote the elongation of seminal/primary roots and adventitious roots (ARs) and they repress lateral root formation. In addition, auxin signaling acts downstream of SLs. AR formation is positively or negatively regulated by SLs depending largely on the plant species and experimental conditions. The relationship between SLs and auxin during AR formation appears to be complex. Most notably, this hormonal response is a key adaption that radically alters rice root architecture in response to nitrogen- and phosphate-deficient conditions.
Keywords: auxin, nitrogen (N), phosphate (P), root, strigolactone (SL)
Strigolactones (SLs) Regulate Root Development
Accumulating evidence indicates that SLs participate in root growth in many plant species. SLs promote the elongation of seminal/primary roots and adventitious roots (ARs)1-4 and they repress lateral root (LR) formation.1-3,5 In Arabidopsis, the length of the primary root in SL mutants was shown to be shorter than that in wild type plants due to a reduction in meristem cell number. This effect could be nullified by the application of GR24 (a synthetic and active SL) in wild-type and SL-deficient plants, but not in an SL-insensitive mutant.2 Interestingly, in rice, SLs also positively control the elongation of ARs.3-4 In the case of LR formation, LR density was shown to be increased in SL-deficient and -insensitive mutants of tomato,2,6,7 while GR24 application decreased the LR density via the signaling gene MAX2, which suppresses LR outgrowth in Arabidopsis.2 SLs positively or negatively regulate AR formation depending on the plant species and experimental conditions. For example, SLs act as suppressors of AR formation from non-root tissues.8,9 AR formation was enhanced in SL mutants of Arabidopsis and pea and an examination of CYCLIN B1 expression suggested that SLs restrain the AR number by inhibiting the first formative divisions of founder cells.8 Conversely, Sun et al.10 found that rice SL mutants produced fewer ARs at the seedling stage and a lower number of ARs per tiller at the mature stage. The AR number in an SL synthetic mutant (d10), but not in an SL signaling mutant (d3), was complemented by GR24 application.
SLs participate in root development in response to nitrogen (N) and phosphate (P) deficiencies
N and P are major nutrients required for plant growth.11,12 SLs play key roles in adaptive responses to N and P deficiencies due to elevated SL levels in roots.13-17 For example, SLs promote symbioses with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi by inducing hyphal branching and they adjust shoot architecture by inhibiting tiller bud outgrowth to better adapt to a P or N deficiency.14,16-21 Recently, it was reported that SLs regulate the perception or response of plants to P-limited conditions.22 In Arabidopsis, mutants of SL signaling (max2-1) and biosynthesis (max4-1) showed reduced responses to P-limited conditions relative to wild-type plants. In max4-1, but not max2-1, the reduced response to low P was compensated by GR24 application. Moreover, abamineSG, which decreases SL levels in plants, reduced the response to low P in wild-type, but not in SL mutant, plants.22 Interestingly, several lines of evidence suggest that SLs are involved in rice root growth in response to N and P deficiencies.3,4 The application of GR24 to wild-type plants and SL synthetic mutants, but not signaling mutants (d3), under nutrient-sufficient conditions led to the complete recovery of seminal root length and LR density compared to wild-type plants under N- and P-deficient conditions. This confirmed that elevated SL levels under nutrient-limiting conditions can lead to the D3-dependent induction of seminal root elongation and a reduction in LR density.4
Hormonal crosstalk between SLs and auxin during root development
In addition to SLs, auxins play a key role in establishing patterns of root morphology and are regulated by the levels of N and P.4,23-25 In terms of seminal root and AR elongation and LR formation, based on an analysis of SL and auxin signaling mutants, it was found that auxin signaling acts downstream of SLs.4,7,9,22 SLs may affect root growth via changes in auxin polar transport from shoot to root and/or auxin efflux in roots. Exogenous supplementation with GR24 interfered with PIN auxin-efflux carriers in roots,4 reducing the PIN1-GFP intensity in LR primordial.6 Thus, SLs might alter the level of auxin required for optimal root development and growth.2 However, the relationship between SLs and auxin in regulating AR formation appears to be complex.8,10 The positive effect of NAA (a synthetic auxin) application and the opposite effect of NPA (an auxin transport inhibitor) application on the AR number in wild-type plants suggests the importance of auxin for AR formation. Nevertheless, the AR number was still greater in wild-type plants compared to SL mutants, although they exhibited similar DR5::GUS expression levels regardless of the exogenous application of NAA or NPA.10 Similarly, SLs can at least partially reverse the stimulatory effect of auxin on adventitious rooting, and auxin can further increase the number of ARs in max mutants.8 At this stage, it is difficult to generalize about the interactions between SLs and auxin in AR formation.
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Acknowledgment
The English in this document has been checked by at least 2 professional editors, both native speakers of English. For a certificate, please see: http://www.textcheck.com/certificate/Xdw1qP.
Funding
Research in China was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation, Innovative Research Team Development Plan of the Ministry of Education of China (No. IRT1256), the 111 Project (No. 12009), and PAPD Project.
References
- 1.Kapulnik Y, Resnick N, Mayzlish-Gati E, Kaplan Y, Wininger S, Hershenhorn J, Koltai H. Strigolactones interact with ethylene and auxin in regulating root-hair elongation in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot 2011a; 62; 2915-24; PMID:21307387; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/jxb/erq464 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ruyter-Spira C, Al-Babili S, van der Krol S, Bouwmeester H. Physiological effects of the synthetic strigolactone analog GR24 on root system architecture in Arabidopsis: another belowground role for strigolactones? Plant Physiol 2011; 155:721-34; PMID:21119044; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1104/pp.110.166645 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Arite T, Kameoka H, Kyozuka J. Strigolactone positively controls crown root elongation in rice. J Plant Growth Regul 2012; 31:165-72; PMID:07217595; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s00344-011-9228-607217595 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sun H, Tao J, Liu S, Huang S, Chen S, Xie X, Yoneyama K, Zhang Y, Xu G. Strigolactones are involved in phosphate and nitrate deficiency-induced root development and auxin transport in rice. J Exp Bot 2014; 65:6735-46; PMID:24596173; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/jxb/eru029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kumar M, Pandya-Kumar N, Kapulnik Y, Koltai H. Strigolactone signaling in root development and phosphate starvation. Plant Signal Behav 2015; 10:7, e1045174; PMID:26251884; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/15592324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Koltai H, Dor E, Hershenhorn J, Joel D, Lekalla S, Shealtiel H, Bhattacharya C, Eliahu E, Resnick N, Barg R, Kapulnik Y. Strigolactones' effect on root growth and root-hair elongation may be mediated by auxin-efflux carriers. J Plant Growth Regul 2010; 29:129-36; PMID:07217595. http://dx.doi: 10.1007/s00344-009-9122-707217595 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kapulnik Y, Delaux PM, Resnick N, Mayzlish-Gati E, Wininger S, Bhattacharya C, Séjalon-Delmas N, Combier JP, Bécard G, Belausov E, Beeckman T, Dor E, Hershenhorn J, Koltai H. Strigolactones affect lateral root formation and root-hair elongation in Arabidopsis. Planta 2011b; 233:209-16; PMID:21080198; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s00425-010-1310-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rasmussen A, Mason MG, De Cuyper C, Brewer PB, Herold S, Agusti J, Geelen D, Greb T, Goormachtig S, Beeckman T, Beveridge CA. Strigolactones suppress adventitious rooting in Arabidopsis and Pea. Plant Physiol 2012; 158:1976-87; PMID:22323776; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1104/pp.111.187104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Brewer PB, Koltai H, Beverdge CA. Diverse roles of strigolactones in plant development. Mol Plant 2013; 6(1):18-28; PMID:23155045; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/mp/sss130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sun H, Tao J, Hou M, Huang S, Chen S, Liang Z, Xie T, Wei Y, Xie X, Yoneyama K, Xu G, Zhang Y. A strigolactones signal is required for adventitious root formation in rice. Ann Bot 2015; 115(7):1155-62; PMID:25888593; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/aob/mcv052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Forde B, Lorenzo H. The nutritional control of root development. Plant Soil 2001; 232:51-68; PMID:15735036; http://dx.doi: 10.1023/A:101032990216515735036 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.López-Bucio J, Cruz-Ramírez A, Herrera-Estrella L. The role of nutrient availability in regulating root architecture. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2003; 6:280-7; PMID:12753979; http://dx.doi: 10.1016/S1369-5266(03)00035-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yoneyama K, Yoneyama K, Takeuchi Y, Sekimoto H. Phosphorus deficiency in red clover promotes exudation of orobanchol, the signal for mycorrhizal symbionts and germination stimulant for root parasites. Planta 2007; 225:1031-8; PMID:17260144; http://dx.doi: 10.1007/s00425-006-0410-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Umehara M, Hanada A, Yoshida S, Akiyama K, Arite T, Takeda-Kamiya N, Magome H, Kamiya Y, Shirasu K, Yoneyama K et al.. Inhibition of shoot branching by new terpenoid plant hormones. Nature 2008; 455:195-200; PMID: 18690207; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nature07272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Xie X, Yoneyama K, Yoneyama K. The strigolactone story. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2010; 48:93-117; PMID:20687831; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev-phyto-073009-114453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.de Jong M, George G, Ongaro V, Williamson L, Willetts B, Ljung K, McCulloch H, Leyer O. Auxin and strigolactone signaling are required for modulation of Arabidopsis shoot branching by N supply. Plant Physiol 2014; 166(1):384-95; PMID:25059707; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1104/pp.114.242388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Xu J, Zha M, Li Y, Ding Y, Chen L, Ding C, Wang S. The interaction between nitrogen availability and auxin, cytokinin, and strigolactone in the control of shoot branching in rice (Oryza sativa L.) Plant Cell Rep 2015; 34:1647-62; PMID:26024762; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s00299-015-1815-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nagahashi G, Douds DD. Partial separation of root exudates components and their effects upon the growth of germinated spores of AM fungi. Mycol Res 2000; 104:1453-64; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1017/S0953756200002860 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Umehara M, Hanada A, Magome H, Takeda-Kamiya N, Yamaguchi S. Contribution of strigolactones to the inhibition of tiller bud outgrowth under phosphate deficiency in rice. Plant Cell Physiol 2010; 51:118-26; PMID:20542891; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/pcp/pcq084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kohlen W, Charnikhova T, Liu Q, Bours R, Domagalska MA, Beguerie S, Verstappen F, Leyser O, Bouwmeester HJ, Ruyter-spira C. Strigolactones are transported through the xylem and play a key role in shoot architectural response to phosphate deficiency in non-AM host Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol 2011; 155:974-87; PMID:21119045; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1104/pp.110.164640 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Czarnecki O, Yang J, Weston DJ, Tuskan GA, Chen JG. A dual role of strigolactones in phosphate acquisition and utilization in plants. Int J Mol Sci 2013; 14:7681-701; PMID:23612324; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3390/ijms14047681 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mayzlish-Gati E, De-Cuyper C, Goormachtig S, Beeckman T, Vuylsteke M, Brewer PB, Beveridge CA, Yermiyahu U, Kaplan Y, Enzer Y, et al.. Strigolactones are involved in root response to low phosphate conditions in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2012; 160:1329-41; PMID:22968830; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1104/pp.112.202358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Forde BG. The role of long-distance signaling in plant responses to nitrate and other nutrients. J Exp Bot 2002; 53:39-43; PMID:11741039; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/jexbot/53.366.39 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chiou TJ, Lin SI. Signaling network in sensing phosphate availability in plants. Ann Rev Plant Biol 2011; 62:185-206; PMID:21370979; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103849 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Niu YF, Chai RS, Jin GL, Wang H, Tang CX, Zhang YS. Responses of root architecture development to low phosphorus availability: a review. Ann Bot 2012; 112(2):391-408; PMID:237006; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/aob/mcs285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]