Skip to main content
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1971 Mar;33(2):266–274. doi: 10.1136/hrt.33.2.266

3 and 12 lead electrocardiogram interpretation by computer. A comparison on 1093 patients.

P W Macfarlane, A R Lorimer, T D Lawrie
PMCID: PMC487174  PMID: 4929444

Full text

PDF
266

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ALLENSTEIN B. J., MORI H. Evaluation of electrocardiographic diagnosis of ventricular hypertrophy based on autopsy comparison. Circulation. 1960 Mar;21:401–412. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.21.3.401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BRODY D. A., ARZBAECHER R. C. A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SEVERAL CORRECTED VECTORCARDIOGRAPHIC LEADS. Circulation. 1964 Apr;29:SUPPL–SUPPL:545. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.29.4.533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bonner R. E., Schwetman H. D. Computer diagnosis of electrocardiograms. II. A computer program for EKG measurements. Comput Biomed Res. 1968 Feb;1(4):366–386. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(68)90066-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Borun E. R., Chapman J. M., Massey F. J., Jr Computer analysis of Frank lead electrocardiographic data recorded in an epidemiologic study. Am J Cardiol. 1966 Nov;18(5):664–671. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(66)90083-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. CACERES C. A., STEINBERG C. A., ABRAHAM S., CARBERY W. J., McBRIDE J. M., TOLLES W. E., RIKLI A. E. Computer extraction of electrocardiographic parameters. Circulation. 1962 Feb;25:356–362. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.25.2.356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. FRANK E. An accurate, clinically practical system for spatial vectorcardiography. Circulation. 1956 May;13(5):737–749. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.13.5.737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Holt J. H., Jr, Barnard A. C., Lynn M. S., Svendsen P. A study of the human heart as a multiple dipole electrical source. I. Normal adult male subjects. Circulation. 1969 Nov;40(5):687–696. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.40.5.687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Macfarlane P. W. A modified axial lead system for orthogonal lead electrocardiography. Cardiovasc Res. 1969 Oct;3(4):510–515. doi: 10.1093/cvr/3.4.510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pordy L., Jaffe H., Chesky K., Friedberg C. K., Fallowes L. Computer diagnosis of electrocardiograms. IV. A computer program for contous analysis with clinical results of rhythm and contour interpretation. Comput Biomed Res. 1968 Feb;1(4):408–433. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(68)90068-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. STALLMANN F. W., PIPBERGER H. V. Automatic recognition of electrocardiographic waves by digital computer. Circ Res. 1961 Nov;9:1138–1143. doi: 10.1161/01.res.9.6.1138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Spach M. S., Barr R. C., Havstad J. W., Long E. C. Skin-electrode impedance and its effect on recording cardiac potentials. Circulation. 1966 Oct;34(4):649–656. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.34.4.649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES