Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Oncology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Oncology
. 2016 Mar 14;34(13):1460–1468. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.0747

Frequency of Germline Mutations in 25 Cancer Susceptibility Genes in a Sequential Series of Patients With Breast Cancer

Nadine Tung 1,, Nancy U Lin 1, John Kidd 1, Brian A Allen 1, Nanda Singh 1, Richard J Wenstrup 1, Anne-Renee Hartman 1, Eric P Winer 1, Judy E Garber 1
PMCID: PMC4872307  PMID: 26976419

Abstract

Purpose

Testing for germline mutations in BRCA1/2 is standard for select patients with breast cancer to guide clinical management. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows testing for mutations in additional breast cancer predisposition genes. The frequency of germline mutations detected by using NGS has been reported in patients with breast cancer who were referred for BRCA1/2 testing or with triple-negative breast cancer. We assessed the frequency and predictors of mutations in 25 cancer predisposition genes, including BRCA1/2, in a sequential series of patients with breast cancer at an academic institution to examine the utility of genetic testing in this population.

Methods

Patients with stages I to III breast cancer who were seen at a single cancer center between 2010 and 2012, and who agreed to participate in research DNA banking, were included (N = 488). Personal and family cancer histories were collected and germline DNA was sequenced with NGS to identify mutations.

Results

Deleterious mutations were identified in 10.7% of women, including 6.1% in BRCA1/2 (5.1% in non-Ashkenazi Jewish patients) and 4.6% in other breast/ovarian cancer predisposition genes including CHEK2 (n = 10), ATM (n = 4), BRIP1 (n = 4), and one each in PALB2, PTEN, NBN, RAD51C, RAD51D, MSH6, and PMS2. Whereas young age (P < .01), Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry (P < .01), triple-negative breast cancer (P = .01), and family history of breast/ovarian cancer (P = .01) predicted for BRCA1/2 mutations, no factors predicted for mutations in other breast cancer predisposition genes.

Conclusion

Among sequential patients with breast cancer, 10.7% were found to have a germline mutation in a gene that predisposes women to breast or ovarian cancer, using a panel of 25 predisposition genes. Factors that predict for BRCA1/2 mutations do not predict for mutations in other breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility genes when these genes are analyzed as a single group. Additional cohorts will be helpful to define individuals at higher risk of carrying mutations in genes other than BRCA1/2.

INTRODUCTION

Testing for mutations in high-penetrance breast cancer predisposition genes, particularly BRCA1 and BRCA2, has become standard practice for patients with breast cancer. Lifetime estimates of breast cancer risk in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) carriers range from 36% to 90% and of ovarian cancer risk range from 24% to 59% and 8% to 35% in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, respectively.1-5 Identification of BRCA1/2 mutations permits the implementation of prevention strategies, including magnetic resonance imaging screening or risk-reducing surgeries, which improves survival.6,7 Genetic testing for other high-risk breast cancer susceptibility genes, such as TP53 (Li-Fraumeni syndrome), PTEN (Cowden’s syndrome), and CDH1 (hereditary diffuse gastric cancer), is also standard in appropriate patients.

More recently, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has enabled simultaneous testing for mutations in these high-penetrance genes and for other, more moderate-risk genes. Multigene panels are now commercially available and are increasingly being used in cancer risk assessment. Compared with high-penetrance genes, for which inherited mutations confer a five-fold or greater breast cancer risk, mutations in moderate-penetrance genes are associated with a two- to four-fold increase in risk. Cancer risks associated with mutations in these less potent predisposition genes are still being investigated. For example, mutations in PALB2, initially thought to confer a moderate risk of breast cancer, now seem to be associated with a five-fold or greater risk.8 NGS also allows simultaneous testing for other hereditary cancer risks, such as Lynch syndrome, in individuals with and without a suggestive family history. In addition, germline mutations in DNA repair genes such as BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D are associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer (Table 1).9-15

Table 1.

Cancer Susceptibility Genes Other Than BRCA1/2

Cancer Susceptibility Gene Breast Cancer RR (90% CI when available) or Inclusion Criteria
Breast
 ATM 2.8 (2.2 to 3.7)35
 BARD1 Breast cancer association reported; RR not yet determined17,46,47
 BRIP1 2.0 (1.3 to 3.0)48; ovarian cancer RR 11.29
 CDH1 6.6 (2.2 to 19.9)49
 CHEK2 3.0 (2.6 to 3.5)35; most data for 1100delC
 NBN 2.7 (1.9 to 3.7)35
 PALB2 5.3 (3.0 to 9.4)35
 PTEN RR 2.0-5.050,51
 STK11 RR 2.0-4.052,53
 TP53 105 (62 to 165)35
Other
 APC Familial adenomatous polyposis
 BMPR1A Juvenile polyposis syndrome
 CDK4 Melanoma syndrome
 CDKN2A Melanoma and pancreas cancer syndrome
 EPCAM Lynch syndrome
 MLH1 Lynch syndrome
 MSH2 Lynch syndrome
 MSH6 Lynch syndrome
 MUTYH* MUTYH-associated polyposis
 PMS2 Lynch syndrome
 RAD51C Ovarian cancer RR 5.2-6.311-13
 RAD51D Ovarian cancer RR 6.3-1212,15
 SMAD4 Juvenile polyposis syndrome

Abbreviations: APC, adenomatous polyposis coli; ATM, ataxia telangiectasia mutated; BARD1, BRCA1-associated RING domain 1; BMPR1A, bone morphogenetic protein receptor, type 1A; BRCA1/2, early-onset breast cancer genes BRCA1 and BRCA2; BRIP1, BRCA1 interacting protein C-terminal helicase 1; CDH1, E-cadherin; CDK4, cyclin-dependent kinase 4; CDKN2A, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A; CHEK2, checkpoint kinase 2; EPCAM, epithelial cell adhesion molecule; MLH1, mutL homolog 1; MSH2, mutS homolog 2; MSH6, mutS homolog 6; MUTYH, biallelic mutY homolog; NBN, nibrin; PALB2, partner and localizer of BRCA2; PMS2, PMS2 postmeiotic segregation increased 2; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog; RAD51C, RAD51 paralog C; RAD51D, RAD51 paralog D; RR, relative risk; SMAD4, SMAD family member 4; STK11, serine/threonine kinase 11; TP53, tumor protein 53.

*

Only tumors with biallelic MUTYH mutations were considered for this analysis.

To date, studies evaluating the prevalence of mutations in moderate-penetrance breast cancer predisposition genes have been conducted in select breast cancer populations including African Americans,16 patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC),17 and cases seen in high-risk genetic clinics.18-21 The prevalence of mutations among patients with breast cancer, who are unselected for specific risk factors such as age at diagnosis, breast cancer subtype, or family cancer history, is unknown.

Evidence-based guidelines for BRCA1/2 testing in patients with breast cancer have been established. Criteria include young age at diagnosis, TNBC, Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry, or a significant family history of breast, ovarian, or other related cancers.22,23 Existing recommendations for mutation detection in other high-penetrance genes are based on specific syndrome features.22 Criteria for testing of moderate-penetrance predisposition genes do not yet exist because predictive factors have not been identified and clinical utility is still being evaluated.

In this study, we assessed the frequency of deleterious germline mutations in 25 cancer susceptibility genes in a population of consecutive patients with breast cancer who presented to an academic cancer center. Our goals were to better understand the contribution of inherited mutations in moderate- and high-risk genes in a breast cancer cohort unselected for family history, breast cancer subtype, ethnicity, or age at diagnosis and to evaluate any clinical or pathologic factors that predict for mutations in moderate-risk genes.

METHODS

Patient Selection

All women with stages I to III breast cancer seen at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, MA) between April 2010 and July 2012, who consented to DNA banking for clinical research, were eligible. Patients with a previous breast cancer were excluded. Cases were identified retrospectively and blood samples were obtained from the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in breast cancer biobank. Clinical and pathologic data abstracted from medical records as part of the Clinical Outcomes for Research Information Service program included personal and family cancer histories, cancer histology, stage and receptor status, ancestry, and history of genetic testing. All breast cancers were reviewed by breast pathologists in the Department of Pathology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. ASCO/College of American Pathologists guidelines were used to define estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positivity. Women with bilateral breast cancer were eligible, provided their first breast cancer was diagnosed between April 2010 and July 2012; only features of the initial breast cancer were assessed. Genetic test results from this analysis were considered research and were not returned to study participants or used for clinical decision making. Specimens were collected for research purposes only and therefore did not comply with Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments chain of custody regulations for clinical testing. This study was approved by the institutional review board of the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center.

NGS Assay

Sample preparation for NGS was performed from frozen DNA using the RainDance microdroplet polymerase chain reaction (PCR) system (RainDance Technologies, Billerica, MA). Briefly, PCR products representing exons and proximal splicing elements of patient DNA were amplified in merged droplets consisting of fragmented patient DNA and select target enrichment primers. These PCR products were subsequently tagged with barcodes and sequencing adaptors for NGS on the Illumina HiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA). To circumvent highly homologous pseudogenes, modified sample preparation with long-range and nested PCR, followed by NGS on the Illumina MiSeq platform, was used for portions of the CHEK2 and PMS2 genes. All clinically actionable variants identified by NGS, as well as regions that did not meet our preset NGS quality metrics, were independently confirmed with orthogonal site-specific Sanger sequencing.

To detect exonic deletions and duplications, NGS dosage, microarray comparative genomic hybridization, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, or a combination of these analyses was performed,24 with all positive results confirmed by an orthogonal method. Gene variants deemed deleterious or suspected as deleterious were considered mutations. Analyzed genes were categorized into two groups (Table 1).

Variant Classification

Variants were classified using American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics recommendations, with supporting linkage, biochemical, clinical, functional, and statistical data used for specific missense and intronic alterations.25-27

Statistics

Participant characteristics and sequencing results were summarized with descriptive statistics, including medians, means, and standard deviations for continuous data. For categorical data, proportions with 95% CIs were calculated by the Clopper-Pearson method. Demographic, clinical, and pathologic characteristics were compared using the χ2 test (categorical variables) and the t test/analysis of variance (continuous variables). P values < .05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Study Population

During the study period, 69.8% of patients with breast cancer seen at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute agreed to use of their clinical data and specimens for research. Sixty-one percent of blood samples were collected within 90 days of the initial breast cancer diagnosis and 94% within 1 year of diagnosis. The median time from diagnosis to blood sample collection was 77 days. Blood samples from 582 cases were analyzed and 87 failed due to insufficient DNA quantity or poor DNA quality. Six cases were excluded due to a prior breast cancer diagnosis and one was excluded for lack of clinical data, resulting in 488 cases which comprised the study cohort. Clinical and tumor pathologic features for study participants are provided in Table 2. The mean age at diagnosis was 50.3 years (range, 28 to 88 years); 7.8% of the study population were Ashkenazi Jewish and 81.4% were non-Ashkenazi white. Nearly 18% of women had TNBC, and 82.6% had stage I or II disease. Further, 49.0% of patients reported having a first- or second-degree relative with breast or ovarian cancer.

Table 2.

Clinical and Tumor Characteristics in Study Cohort (N = 488)

Study Characteristic No. %
Age at diagnosis, years
 Mean ± SD 50.3 ± 11.3
 Median 49
 Range 28-88
 ≤ 45 180 36.9
 46-60 199 40.8
 > 60 109 22.3
Race/ethnicity
 Ashkenazi Jewish 38 7.8
 Non-Hispanic white (not Ashkenazi Jewish) 397 81.4
 Hispanic 17 3.5
 African American 12 2.5
 Asian 10 2.0
 Other 14 2.9
Ashkenazi Jewish ethnicity
 Yes 38 7.8
 No 450 92.2
Breast cancer subtypes, receptor status
 TNBC 87 17.8
 HR-positive/HER2-negative 301 61.7
 HR-negative/HER2-positive 37 7.6
 HR-positive/HER2-positive 63 12.9
Histology
 Ductal 357 73.2
 Lobular 36 7.4
 Ductal and lobular 68 13.9
 Other 27 5.5
Grade*
 1 60 12.3
 2 181 37.2
 3 246 50.5
Stage
 I 185 37.9
 II 218 44.7
 III 85 17.4
Bilateral disease
 Yes 9 1.8
 No 479 98.2
Patient history of prior cancer
 Yes 41 8.4
 No 447 91.6
First-degree relative with any cancer
 Yes 271 56.7
 No 207 43.3
First-/second-degree relative with any cancer
 Yes 403 84.3
 No 75 15.7
First-/second-degree relative with breast or ovarian cancer
 Yes 234 49.0
 No 244 51.0
First-/second-degree relative with breast cancer (< 50 years of age), male breast cancer, or ovarian cancer (any age)
 Yes 89 18.6
 No 389 81.4

Abbreviations: HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hormone receptor; SD, standard deviation, TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer.

*

Tumor grade was missing for one patient.

Excludes in situ cancers and nonmelanoma skin cancers.

Ten patients were missing family history information. These patients were excluded from analysis. If age at diagnosis was unavailable, it was conservatively considered to be older than 50 years.

Frequency of Deleterious Mutations

Among 488 patients with breast cancer, 55 deleterious mutations were identified in 52 (10.7%) women (Table 3; Appendix Table A1, online only). Thirty (6.1%) women had a germline BRCA1/2 mutation; 18 in BRCA1 and 12 in BRCA2. In addition, 20 (4.1%) women had a total of 21 deleterious mutations in non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer predisposition genes including CHEK2 (n = 10), ATM (n = 4), BRIP1 (n = 4), and one each in PALB2, PTEN, and NBN. One ATM mutation was identified in a woman with a BRCA2 mutation, and one patient had both an ATM and a CHEK2 mutation. Four (0.8%) women carried deleterious mutations in genes unrelated to breast cancer; two in Lynch-related genes (one each in MSH6 and PMS2), and one each in RAD51C and RAD51D. The patient with a PMS2 mutation also had a BRCA1 mutation. Thus, 49 (10.0%) women had an inherited mutation in a breast cancer predisposition gene and 52 (10.7%) in a gene associated with breast or ovarian cancer risk. Eight of the 10 CHEK2 mutations identified were 1100delC. No mutations in BARD1, CDH1, STK11, TP53, APC, BMPR1A, CDK4, CDKN2A p14, CDKN2A p16, EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2, MUTYH (biallelic), or SMAD4 were detected. Four patients with I1307K APC variants and nine women with monoallelic MUTYH mutations were identified but not included in this analysis due to lower associated cancer risk. Specific mutations identified and associated patient characteristics are provided in Appendix Table A1.

Table 3.

Germline Mutations Identified (N = 488)

Genes No. of Patients With Mutation Percent With Mutation 95% CI
Any deleterious mutation* 52 (55 total mutations) 10.7 8.1 to 13.7
Genes related to breast cancer* 49 10.0 7.5 to 13.1
 BRCA1 or BRCA2 30 6.1 4.2 to 8.7
  BRCA1* 18 3.7 2.2 to 5.8
  BRCA2* 12 2.5 1.3 to 4.3
 Other genes related to breast cancer* 20 (21 total mutations) 4.1 2.5 to 6.3
  ATM* 4 0.8 0.2 to 2.1
  BRIP1 4 0.8 0.2 to 2.1
  CHEK2* 10 2.1 1.0 to 3.7
  NBN 1 0.2 0.01 to 1.1
  PALB2 1 0.2 0.01 to 1.1
  PTEN 1 0.2 0.01 to 1.1
Genes not clearly related to breast cancer* 4 0.8 0.2 to 2.1
 MSH6 1 0.2 0.01 to 1.1
 PMS2* 1 0.2 0.01 to 1.1
 RAD51C 1 0.2 0.01 to 1.1
 RAD51D 1 0.2 0.01 to 1.1

NOTE. No mutations were identified in the following genes: BARD1; CDH1; STK11; TP53; APC; BMPR1A; CDK4; CDKN2A p14; CDKN2A p16; EPCAM; MLH1; MSH2; MUTYH (biallellic); and SMAD4.

*

One patient had deleterious mutations in both BRCA2 and ATM. Another patient had deleterious mutations in both BRCA1 and PMS2. Another patient had deleterious mutations in both ATM and CHEK2.

Eight of 10 CHEK2 mutations were 1100delC (Appendix Table A1).

Of the 30 patients with a BRCA1/2 mutation, four (13.3%) had not been clinically identified after diagnosis but did meet National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for BRCA1/2 testing.

Variants of Uncertain Significance

At least one variant of uncertain significance (VUS) was identified in 162 (33.2%) women, with as many as three variants found per patient. Fifteen patients with a VUS also had a deleterious mutation. All VUSs identified are listed in Appendix Table A2 (online only).

Predictors of Deleterious Mutations

Age.

For BRCA1/2, the prevalence of deleterious mutations decreased with age at breast cancer diagnosis, with a frequency of 12.2%, 3.0%, and 1.8% for women diagnosed at age ≤ 45 years, 46 to 60 years, and older than 60 years, respectively (Table 4). In contrast, for these same age groups, the frequency of mutations in other genes related to breast cancer ranged from 3.7% to 4.4%, irrespective of age at diagnosis (Table 4).

Table 4.

Frequency of Deleterious Mutations by Age at Breast Cancer Diagnosis

Patients ≤ 45 Years of Age With DM (n = 180) Patients 46-60 Years of Age With DM (n = 199) Patients > 60 Years of Age With DM (n = 109)
Genes No. % (95% CI) No. % (95% CI) No. % (95% CI)
Any deleterious mutation* 30 16.7 (11.5 to 22.9) 15 7.5 (4.3 to 12.1) 7 6.4 (2.6 to 12.8)
Genes related to breast cancer* 29 16.1 (11.1 to 22.3) 14 7.0 (3.9 to 11.5) 6 5.5 (2.1 to 11.6)
 BRCA1 or BRCA2 22 12.2 (7.8 to 17.9) 6 3.0 (1.1 to 6.5) 2 1.8 (0.2 to 6.5)
  BRCA1* 15 8.3 (4.7 to 13.4) 2 1.0 (0.1 to 3.6) 1 0.9 (0.02 to 5.0)
  BRCA2* 7 3.9 (1.6 to 7.9) 4 2.0 (0.6 to 5.1) 1 0.9 (0.02 to 5.0)
 Other genes related to breast cancer* 8 4.4 (1.9 to 8.6) 8 4.0 (1.8 to 7.8) 4 3.7 (1.0 to 9.1)
  ATM* 3 1.7 (0.4 to 4.8) 1 0.5 (0.01 to 2.8) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 3.3)
  BRIP1 1 0.6 (0.01 to 3.1) 2 1.0 (0.1 to 3.6) 1 0.9 (0.02 to 5.0)
  CHEK2* 4 2.2 (0.6 to 5.6) 3 1.5 (0.3 to 4.3) 3 2.8 (0.6 to 7.8)
  NBN 0 0.0 (0.0 to 2.0) 1 0.5 (0.01 to 2.8) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 3.3)
  PALB2 1 0.6 (0.01 to 3.1) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 1.8) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 3.3)
  PTEN 0 0.0 (0 to 2.0) 1 0.5 (0.01 to 2.8) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 3.3)
Genes not clearly related to breast cancer* 2 1.1 (0.1 to 4.0) 1 0.5 (0.01 to 2.8) 1 0.9 (0.02 to 5.0)
 MSH6 0 0.0 (0.0 to 2.0) 1 0.5 (0.01 to 2.8) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 3.3)
 PMS2* 1 0.6 (0.01 to 3.1) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 1.8) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 3.3)
 RAD51C 0 0.0 (0.0 to 2.0) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 1.8) 1 0.9 (0.02 to 5.0)
 RAD51D 1 0.6 (0.01 to 3.1) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 1.8) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 3.3)

NOTE. No mutations were identified in the following genes: BARD1; CDH1; STK11; TP53; APC; BMPR1A; CDK4; CDKN2A p14; CDKN2A p16; EPCAM; MLH1; MSH2; MUTYH (biallelic); and SMAD4.

Abbreviation: DM, deleterious mutation.

*

One patient diagnosed in the ≤ 45 years old group had deleterious mutations in both BRCA2 and ATM. Another patient diagnosed in the ≤ 45 years old group had deleterious mutations in both BRCA1 and PMS2. Another patient diagnosed in the ≤ 45 years old group had deleterious mutations in both ATM and CHEK2.

Breast cancer subtype.

Table 5 illustrates the prevalence of deleterious mutations according to breast cancer subtype. The highest prevalence of BRCA1/2 or of any mutations was in women with TNBC. Among 87 women with TNBC, 15 (17.2%) had a deleterious germline mutation, with 12 of these (13.8%) in BRCA1/2 (11 BRCA1, 1 BRCA2). Two (2.3%) women had a mutation in another breast cancer predisposition gene (one each in BRIP1 and NBN) and one (1.1%) in RAD51D. Among 301 women with ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer, 26 (8.6%) had at least one mutation, with 15 (5.0%) in BRCA1/2 (5 BRCA1, 10 BRCA2) and 11 (3.7%) in another breast/ovarian cancer predisposition gene including CHEK2 (n = 4), ATM (n = 3), and one each in PALB2, BRIP1, PTEN, RAD51C, and MSH6. One woman had mutations in both ATM and CHEK2. Among 37 women with ER-negative HER2-positive disease, two (5.4%) had a BRCA1 mutation and two (5.4%) had a CHEK2 mutation. Eleven percent of 63 women with ER-positive HER2-positive breast cancer had a mutation, one (1.6%) in BRCA2 (also in ATM) and six (9.5%) in other breast cancer predisposition genes including CHEK2 (n = 4) and BRIP1 (n = 2).

Table 5.

Deleterious Mutations by Breast Cancer Subtype (N = 488)

Patients With TNBC Mutation (n = 87) Patients With ER-Positive/HER2-Negative Mutation (n = 301) Patients With ER-Negative/HER2-Positive Mutation (n = 37) Patients With ER-Positive/HER2-Positive Mutation (n = 63)
Genes No. % (95% CI) No. % (95% CI) No. % (95% CI) No. % (95% CI)
Any deleterious mutation* 15 17.2 (10.0 to 26.8) 26 8.6 (5.7 to 12.4) 4 10.8 (3.0 to 25.4) 7 11.1 (4.6 to 21.6)
Genes related to breast cancer* 14 16.1 (9.1 to 25.5) 24 8.0 (5.2 to 11.6) 4 10.8 (3.0 to 25.4) 7 11.1 (4.6 to 21.6)
 BRCA1 or BRCA2 12 13.8 (7.3 to 22.9) 15 5.0 (2.8 to 8.1) 2 5.4 (0.7 to 18.2) 1 1.6 (0.04 to 8.5)
  BRCA1* 11 12.6 (6.5 to 21.5) 5 1.7 (0.5 to 3.8) 2 5.4 (0.7 to 18.2) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 5.7)
  BRCA2* 1 1.1 (0.03 to 6.2) 10 3.3 (1.6 to 6.0) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 9.5) 1 1.6 (0.04 to 8.5)
 Other genes related to breast cancer* 2 2.3 (0.3 to 8.1) 9 3.0 (1.4 to 5.6) 2 5.4 (0.7 to 18.2) 7 11.1 (4.6 to 21.6)
  ATM* 0 0.0 (0.0 to 4.2) 3 1.0 (0.2 to 2.9) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 9.5) 1 1.6 (0.04 to 8.5)
  BRIP1 1 1.1 (0.03 to 6.2) 1 0.3 (0.01 to 1.8) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 9.5) 2 3.2 (0.4 to 11.0)
  CHEK2* 0 0.0 (0.0 to 4.2) 4 1.3 (0.4 to 3.4) 2 5.4 (0.7 to 18.2) 4 6.3 (1.8 to 15.5)
  NBN 1 1.1 (0.03 to 6.2) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 1.2) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 9.5) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 5.7)
  PALB2 0 0.0 (0.0 to 4.2) 1 0.3 (0.01 to 1.8) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 9.5) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 5.7)
  PTEN 0 0.0 (0.0 to 4.2) 1 0.3 (0.01 to 1.8) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 9.5) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 5.7)
Genes not clearly related to breast cancer* 2 2.3 (0.3 to 8.1) 2 0.7 (0.1 to 2.4) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 9.5) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 5.7)
 MSH6 0 0.0 (0.0 to 4.2) 1 0.3 (0.01 to 1.8) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 9.5) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 5.7)
 PMS2* 1 1.1 (0.03 to 6.2) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 1.2) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 9.5) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 5.7)
 RAD51C 0 0.0 (0.0 to 4.2) 1 0.3 (0.01 to 1.8) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 9.5) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 5.7)
 RAD51D 1 1.1 (0.03 to 6.2) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 1.2) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 9.5) 0 0.0 (0.0 to 5.7)

NOTE. No mutations were identified in the following genes: BARD1; CDH1; STK11; TP53; APC; BMPR1A; CDK4; CDKN2A p14; CDKN2A p16; EPCAM; MLH1; MSH2; MUTYH (biallelic); and SMAD4.

Abbreviations: HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hormone receptor; TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer.

*

One HR-positive/HER2-positive patient had deleterious mutations in both BRCA2 and ATM. One TNBC patient had deleterious mutations in both BRCA1 and PMS2. One HR-positive/HER2-negative patient had deleterious mutations in both ATM and CHEK2.

All predictors.

Factors that significantly predicted for a BRCA1/2 mutation included younger age at breast cancer diagnosis (P < .01); Ashkenazi Jewish heritage (P < .01); TNBC (P = .01); tumor histologic grade 3 (P < .01); and family history of breast cancer diagnosed at age younger than 50 years, male breast cancer, or ovarian cancer (P < .01; Table 6). No factors predicted for a mutation in other breast cancer predisposition genes when these genes were analyzed as a single group.

Table 6.

Clinical and Pathologic Predictors of Germline Mutations in BRCA1/2 and Other Breast Cancer Predisposition Genes*

Variable No Mutation (n = 436) BRCA1/2 Mutation (n = 30) Other BC Mutation (n = 19)* P
No. % No. % No. % No Mutation v BRCA1/2 Mutation No Mutation v Other BC Mutation
Patient characteristic
 Age at BC diagnosis, years < .01 .72
  Mean ± SD 50.7 ± 11.2 42.6 ± 9.7 51.6 ± 10.9
  Median 49 40 53
  Range 28-88 31-66 34-68
  ≤ 45 150 34.4 22 73.3 7 36.8 < .01 .96
  46-60 184 42.2 6 20.0 8 42.1
  > 60 102 23.4 2 6.7 4 21.1
 Ashkenazi Jewish heritage
  Yes 29 6.7 7 23.3 2 10.5 < .01 .51
  No 407 93.3 23 76.7 17 89.5
 History of cancer
  Yes 37 8.5 1 3.3 3 15.8 .32 .27
  No 399 91.5 29 96.7 16 84.2
BC characteristic
 Subtype
  TNBC 72 16.5 12 40.0 2 10.5 .01 .11
  HR-positive/HER2-negative 275 63.1 15 50.0 9 47.4
  HR-negative/HER2-positive 33 7.6 2 6.7 2 10.5
  HR-positive/HER2-positive 56 12.8 1 3.3 6 31.6
 Histology
  Ductal 325 74.5 22 73.3 10 52.6 .50 .08
  Lobular 33 7.6 1 3.3 2 10.5
  Ductal and lobular 58 13.3 4 13.3 4 21.1
  Other 20 4.6 3 10.0 3 15.8
 Histologic grade§
  1 57 13.1 0 0.0 3 15.8 < .01 .94
  2 167 38.4 4 13.3 7 36.8
  3 211 48.5 26 86.7 9 47.4
 Stage
  I 169 38.8 12 40.0 4 21.1 .03 .12
  II 198 45.4 8 26.7 9 47.4
  III 69 15.8 10 33.3 6 31.6
 Bilateral disease
  Yes 8 1.8 0 0.0 1 5.3 .45 .29
  No 428 98.2 30 100.0 18 94.7
Family history of cancer and prior genetic testing
 First-degree relative with any cancer
  Yes 242 56.8 15 50.0 12 63.2 .47 .58
  No 184 43.2 15 50.0 7 36.8
 First- or second-degree relative with any cancer
  Yes 356 83.6 30 100.0 15 78.9 .02 .60
  No 70 16.4 0 0.0 4 21.1
 First- or second-degree relative with BC or ovarian cancer
  Yes 202 47.4 22 73.3 9 47.4 .01 1.0
  No 224 52.6 8 26.7 10 52.6
 First- or second-degree relative < 50 years of age with BC, ovarian cancer, or male BC
  Yes 71 16.7 12 40.0 5 26.3 < .01 .27
  No 355 83.3 18 60.0 14 73.7

Abbreviations: BC, breast cancer; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hormone receptor; SD, standard deviation; TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer.

*

Three patients with mutations not associated with breast cancer were not included in this analysis.

One patient with BRCA2 and ATM mutations is included with BRCA1/2 Mutation (not with Other BC Mutation).

Excludes in situ cancers and nonmelanoma skin cancers.

§

Tumor grade was missing for one patient without a mutation.

Ten patients were missing family history information. These patients were excluded from analysis. If age at diagnosis was unavailable, it was conservatively considered to be older than 50 years.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study of the frequency of germline mutations in BRCA1/2 and other breast cancer predisposition genes retrospectively done in a prospectively collected, sequential series of patients with breast cancer who consented to DNA banking for clinical research. Among 488 patients, we found that 6.1% had a BRCA1/2 mutation (18.4% among Ashkenazi Jewish and 5.1% among non-Ashkenazi) and an additional 3.9% had a mutation in another breast cancer predisposition gene. In addition, four (0.8%) patients had a mutation in a gene linked to ovarian cancer, RAD51C, RAD51D, or a Lynch syndrome gene, one of whom also had a BRCA1 mutation. In total, 10.7% of patients had a deleterious mutation in at least one cancer predisposition gene. The only other report of germline mutations among unselected patients with breast cancer is from The Cancer Genome Atlas, which found that among 507 cases, 5.5% had a germline BRCA1/2 mutation and 4.3% had a mutation in another cancer predisposition gene. The mutation distribution was almost identical to that found in our study.28 Likewise, the prevalence of mutations in non-BRCA1/2 predisposition genes was 3.7% in more than 1,800 TNBC cases17 and 4.5% in 289 African American women with breast cancer.16

Previous studies of multigene panel testing in patients with breast cancer, who were identified through high-risk clinics, have also consistently reported a prevalence of germline mutations in non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer predisposition genes of approximately 4%, with up to an additional 1% in other cancer susceptibility genes if heterozygous MUTYH mutations are excluded.18-21 The prevalence of mutations in moderate-penetrance breast cancer genes seems to be similar in this sequential series of breast cancer cases and in cases from high-risk clinics. Predictive factors for BRCA1/2 and other high-penetrance genes that lead to referral to high-risk clinics do not seem to predict for mutations in moderate-penetrance genes. For example, as expected, the frequency of BRCA1/2 mutations decreased with increasing age at breast cancer diagnosis. However, the frequency of deleterious mutations in non-BRCA1/2 predisposition genes is independent of age at diagnosis (Table 4). As a result, among women diagnosed with breast cancer between ages 46 and 60 years in our cohort, more than half the mutations are in genes other than BRCA1/2. Among women diagnosed after 60 years of age, 6.4% had a deleterious mutation, with almost three-fourths in genes other than BRCA1/2.

As expected, factors known to enrich for BRCA1/2 mutations (such as Ashkenazi heritage, TNBC subtype, and strong family history of breast or ovarian cancer) predicted for BRCA1/2 mutations in our study. However, these factors were not significantly associated with mutations in other breast cancer predisposition genes when these genes were analyzed as a single group. We were unable to identify any factors that predicted for a mutation in non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer genes. Larger cohorts of women with mutations in each gene are required to identify gene-specific predictors. For example, the prevalence of ER-positive breast cancer is higher among germline CHEK2 1100delC mutation carriers than noncarriers.29

We found that among non-BRCA1/2 genes, mutations in CHEK2 were most common. This is consistent with results from most studies that have evaluated multigene panels in breast cancer cohorts not enriched for TNBC.19,20,30 The clinical significance of mutations in moderate-risk breast cancer genes such as CHEK2, ATM, and NBN is still being evaluated. An increased risk of contralateral breast cancer has been associated with germline mutations in PALB2 and CHEK2, suggesting that subsequent screening with breast magnetic resonance imaging may be indicated in these patients.29,31-33 We identified one mutation in PTEN, a high-penetrance cancer predisposition gene associated with Cowden syndrome and an increased risk of breast, thyroid, endometrial, and other cancers. This result would allow initiation of appropriate surveillance and risk-reduction strategies.

We also identified six mutations in three genes (BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D) that are associated with a six- to 12-fold increased risk of ovarian cancer.10-13,15 Mutations were found even in women with breast cancer diagnosed after 60 years of age. Only two of the six mutation carriers had a personal or family history of ovarian cancer. It seems that identification of mutations in more moderate-penetrance ovarian cancer susceptibility genes will require testing of families with less notable cancer histories.34 Finally, we found two mutations in genes for Lynch syndrome. Identification of such mutations can lead to increased surveillance for and identification of colorectal, endometrial, ovarian, and other cancers in these patients with breast cancer and their relatives.18

The use of multigene panels for assessment of cancer susceptibility has been increasing rapidly in clinical practice. In addition to including high-penetrance genes with established clinical utility, these panels contain genes for which clinical validity or significance is less certain at this time.35 Proper interpretation of results is critical so that appropriate recommendations for risk management are offered. This presents challenges for clinicians, who often lack genetic training, and their patients, who face decisions about screening and prevention strategies.

Whereas the significance of mutations in several of the non-BRCA1/2 predisposition genes is still being studied, the benefit of identifying BRCA1/2 mutations is well established. In addition to cancer prevention strategies, BRCA-associated cancers have a greater response to therapies such as poly-(ADP) ribose polymerase inhibitors and platinum agents than sporadic cancers.36-39 Studying a sequential series of patients with breast cancer allowed us to evaluate how often BRCA mutations might be missed in clinical practice, at least in an academic setting. Only four (13.3%) of the BRCA1/2 mutation carriers were first identified through this study, and all 30 carriers fulfilled NCCN 2015 genetic testing criteria. Thus, clinicians seem to be recognizing patients with breast cancer who are appropriate for BRCA1/2 testing, and the NCCN criteria seem to perform well. Increased clinician education about testing criteria might decrease the frequency of unidentified carriers even further.

Consistent with previous studies, we found the highest prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations among cases with TNBC. For patients with ER-negative or ER-positive breast cancer, we found the frequency of BRCA mutations to be lower if the tumor also overexpressed HER2, consistent with previous reports (Table 5).40-43

Approximately one-third of patients had at least one VUS, as has been reported in other series evaluating NGS panels.18 Most of these variants will eventually be reclassified, primarily as benign, but some will likely be deleterious.27,44 VUSs should not be used to make clinical decisions.

Our study has limitations. Cases were ascertained from an academic center and may not reflect the breast cancer population or prevalence of mutations in the community. In our cohort, the median age at diagnosis was 50 years compared with 61 years in the United States.45 Likewise, compared with the general population, a higher proportion of individuals (7.8%) were of Ashkenazi descent. However, although these factors may increase the prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations, our results show that they do not seem to increase the frequency of mutations in moderate-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes. Indeed, one report found a lower frequency of non-BRCA1/2 mutations in the Ashkenazi population.19 Finally, only 11% of women in the study were nonwhite, limiting the generalizability of our findings in more diverse populations. Large population-based studies are needed to establish the true frequency of mutations in these genes.

In conclusion, this is the largest prospective study to date to assess the prevalence of mutations in cancer susceptibility genes among a sequential series of breast cancer cases seen at an academic institution and not otherwise selected for age, family history, ethnicity, or breast cancer subtype. We identified a mutation in 10.7% of patients, 6.1% in BRCA1/2 (5.1% in patients of non-Ashkenazi descent) and 4.6% in other breast/ovarian cancer predisposition genes. The prevalence of mutations in genes other than BRCA1/2 seems to be relatively consistent regardless of breast cancer population tested, when these genes are assessed as a single group. Although clinicians seem to be identifying the majority of patients with breast cancer who have BRCA1/2 mutations, the lack of predictive factors for mutations in other breast/ovarian cancer predisposition genes presents a challenge for identifying these carriers. Until better predictors emerge, it will be necessary to continue casting a wider net for identification of mutations in non-BRCA1/2 genes. This is despite the unclear clinical significance at present for several genes that are included in many commercially available, broad gene panels.

Acknowledgment

We thank Elizabeth Root and Elizabeth Cotter for research support with the study.

GLOSSARY TERMS

germline mutation:

an inherited variation in the lineage of germ cells. Germline mutations can be passed on to offspring.

NextGen Sequencing:

a non-Sanger rapid DNA sequencing method that can be done with greater speed, developed after the first methodologic articles describing relatively rapid DNA sequencing produced by Sanger et al (1977).

penetrance:

the likelihood that a given gene mutation will produce disease. This likelihood is calculated by examining the proportion of people with the particular genetic mutation that show symptoms of disease.

triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC):

breast tumors that are negative for estrogen and progesterone receptor expression and that also underexpress HER-neu.

Appendix

Table A1.

Mutations Identified in Study Cohort

Study ID Ashkenazi Decent Bilateral Breast Cancer Gene Mutation Mutation Effect Age at Dx (Years) Breast Cancer Subtype Family History
BOB16452 N N ATM c.5623C>T (p.Arg1875*) Truncation 60 HR+/HER- None
BOB17213 N N BRCA1 c.5467+3A>C Splice site 34 TNBC CO, LK, Ovary
BOB17227 Y N BRCA1 c.68_69del (p.Glu23Valfs*17) Frameshift 45 HR-/HER+ Breast, ES, UNP
BOB17377 Y N BRCA2 c.1754del (p.Lys585Argfs*29) Frameshift 62 HR+/HER- BL, LG, Ovary, LYM, CO
BOB17390 N N BRCA1 c.4327C>T (p.Arg1443*) truncation 32 TNBC Breast, Breast, Ovary, PAN
BOB17443 Y N BRCA1 c.68_69del (p.Glu23Valfs*17) Frameshift 66 TNBC Other, Ovary
BOB17447 Y N BRCA1 c.68_69del (p.Glu23Valfs*17) Frameshift 34 HR-/HER+ Breast, CNS, LK
BOB17521 N N CHEK2 c.1368dupA (p.Glu457Argfs*33) Frameshift 42 HR+/HER+ None
BOB17625 N N PALB2 c.599del (p.Leu200*) Frameshift 34 HR+/HER- Breast, UNP, UNP, LG
BOB17832 N N RAD51D del exon 1 Large rearrangement 40 TNBC STO, PR, Other, PR, Breast
BOB17843 N N CHEK2 c.1100del (p.Thr367Metfs*15) Frameshift 36 HR-/HER+ Breast, HD, Breast, LK
BOB17913 Y N BRIP1 c.2392C>T (p.Arg798*) Truncation 40 HR+/HER+ PR
BOB18197 N N BRCA2 c.5682C>A (p.Tyr1894*) Truncation 37 HR+/HER- Breast, STO, CO
BOB18292 N N BRCA1 c.4964_4982del (p.Ser1655Tyrfs*16) Frameshift 37 HR-/HER+ Ovary
BOB18356 N N BRCA1 c.220C>T (p.Gln74*) Truncation 59 TNBC LG, LG, LG
BOB18732 N N CHEK2 c.1100del (p.Thr367Metfs*15) Frameshift 68 HR+/HER+ PR, ES, Breast, FG, Breast
BOB18736 N N BRCA1 del exons 1-2 Large rearrangement 43 TNBC Breast, Breast
BOB18885 N N BRIP1 c.2392C>T (p.Arg798*) Truncation 50 HR+/HER+ PR, Other, Ovary, STO, Breast, ENDO
BOB200145 N N CHEK2 c.1100del (p.Thr367Metfs*15) Frameshift 58 HR-/HER+ None
BOB20037 N N BRCA1 c.4675+1G>A Splice site 39 HR+/HER- UNP
BOB20040 N N CHEK2 c.1100del (p.Thr367Metfs*15) Frameshift 64 HR+/HER+ CO, CO, LG, PAN
BOB20049 N N NBN c.127C>T (p.Arg43*) Truncation 56 TNBC LG, LG, LG, CNS, PAN
BOB20068 N N BRCA1 c.5266dupC (p.Gln1756Profs*74) Frameshift 43 HR+/HER- Breast, CO, Breast, LYM
BOB20216 N N BRCA2 c.6644dupA (p.Tyr2215*) Frameshift 34 HR+/HER+ Breast
BOB20297 N N CHEK2 c.1100del (p.Thr367Metfs*15) Frameshift 56 HR+/HER- MM, CO, LG, WT
BOB20304 Y N BRCA2 c.5946del (p.Ser1982Argfs*22) Frameshift 58 HR+/HER- PR
BOB20356WB Y N CHEK2 c.1100del (p.Thr367Metfs*15) Frameshift 46 HR+/HER- Breast, ENDO, CLL, Breast, STO, PR
BOB20421WB N N ATM c.7705del (p.Asp2569Metfs*4) Frameshift 39 HR+/HER- Other
BOB20467 N N ATM c.3381_3384del (p.Gln1128Lysfs*3) Frameshift 33 HR+/HER+ Breast, ES, THY, PAN, Breast
BOB20467 N N BRCA2 c.6267_6269delinsC (p.Glu2089Aspfs*2) Frameshift 33 HR+/HER+ Breast, ES, THY, PAN, Breast
BOB20605WB N N BRCA2 c.658_659del (p.Val220Ilefs*4) Frameshift 47 TNBC OCMEL
BOB20702WB N N BRIP1 c.2392C>T (p.Arg798*) Truncation 66 HR+/HER- CO
BOB20756 N N BRCA1 c.5137del (p.Val1713*) Frameshift 31 HR+/HER- Breast, Breast, BL, PR, LG, BL
BOB20822WB N N CHEK2 c.1100del (p.Thr367Metfs*15) Frameshift 45 HR+/HER+ KID, Breast, Breast, KID, LYM, PR
BOB20858WB N N BRCA1 c.5266dupC (p.Gln1756Profs*74) Frameshift 38 TNBC STO, BL, Breast, CO, PR
BOB20980WB N N BRCA2 c.5946del (p.Ser1982Argfs*22) Frameshift 53 HR+/HER- PR, BL
BOB20988WB N N BRCA2 c.7618-1G>A Splice site 48 HR+/HER- Breast, LG
BOB21280WB N N BRCA2 c.8585dupT (p.Glu2863Argfs*6) Frameshift 38 HR+/HER+ FT, Breast, Ovary, PR
BOB21299WB N N BRCA1 c.5503C>T (p.Arg1835*) Truncation 33 HR-/HER+ LG, Breast
BOB21299WB N N PMS2 c.137G>T (p.Ser46Ile) Missense 33 HR-/HER+ LG, Breast
BOB21399WB N N BRCA1 c.415C>T (p.Gln139*) Truncation 45 TNBC Breast, CO, BL, CO, Other, CO
BOB21568WB N N CHEK2 c.1100del (p.Thr367Metfs*15) Frameshift 68 HR+/HER+ Ovary, PAN
BOB21578WB N N BRCA2 c.8537_8538del (p.Glu2846Glyfs*22) Frameshift 41 HR+/HER- Breast, Breast, Breast, PR
BOB21663WB N N BRCA1 c.5266dupC (p.Gln1756Profs*74) Frameshift 33 TNBC Breast, Breast
BOB21668WB N N BRCA1 del exons 1-23 Large rearrangement 42 HR+/HER+ HN, Breast, Ovary, Cx
BOB21887WB N N BRIP1 c.2255_2256del (p.Lys752Argfs*12) Frameshift 53 TNBC BL, Breast, CNS, MEL
BOB21984WB Y N BRCA2 c.5946del (p.Ser1982Argfs*22) Frameshift 39 HR+/HER- LG
BOB22130WB N Y ATM c.3993+1G>A Splice site 44 HR+/HER- CO, Breast, Breast
BOB22130WB N Y CHEK2 c.444+1G>A Splice site 44 HR+/HER- CO, Breast, Breast
BOB22416WB N N RAD51C c.577C>T (p.Arg193*) Truncation 77 HR+/HER- None
BOB23112WB N N BRCA1 c.962G>A (p.Trp321*) Truncation 56 HR-/HER+ Breast, Breast
BOB23117WB N N PTEN c.388C>T (p.Arg130*) Truncation 56 HR+/HER- PR, THY, ENDO, LG, PAN
BOB23508WB N N MSH6 del exons 3-9 Large rearrangement 50 HR+/HER+ ENDO, ENDO, LG
BOB24634 Y N BRCA2 c.2808_2811del (p.Ala938Profs*21) Frameshift 45 HR+/HER+ ES, PR
BOB24943 N N BRCA1 c.5266dupC (p.Gln1756Profs*74) Frameshift 34 HR+/HER- LARYNX, Breast, LK, Breast, CO

Abbreviations: BL, bladder cancer; Breast, breast cancer; CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia; CNS, central nervous system cancer; CO, colorectal cancer; Cx, cervical cancer; Dx, diagnosis; ENDO, endometrial/uterine cancer; ES, esophageal cancer; FG, female genital cancer, unspecified; FT, fallopian tube cancer; HD, Hodgkins lymphoma; HER, human epidermal growth factor receptor; HN, head and neck cancer; HR, hormone receptor; KID, kidney cancer unspecified; larynx, laryngeal cancer; LG, lung cancer; LK, leukemia; LYM, lymphoma; MEL, melanoma; MM, multiple myeloma; N, no; OCMEL, ocular melanoma; Other, cancer unspecified; Ovary, ovarian cancer; PAN, pancreatic cancer-exocrine; PR, prostate cancer; STO, stomach cancer; THY, thyroid cancer; TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer; UNP, cancer of unknown primary; WT, wilms tumor; Y, yes.

P16 NM_000077.4 PALB2 NM_024675.3 PMS2 NM_000535.5 PTEN NM_000314.4 RAD51C NM_058216.2 RAD51D NM_002878.3 SMAD4 NM_005359.5 STK11 NM_000455.4 TP53 NM_000546.5

Table A2.

Variants of Unknown Significance Identified in Study Cohort

Study ID Gene Variant of Uncertain Significance
BOB21387WB APC c.5424_5426del (p.Asn1808del)
BOB20704WB APC c.437C>T (p.Ala146Val)
BOB20752WB APC c.1276G>T (p.Ala426Ser)
BOB20406WB APC c.2204C>T (p.Ala735Val)
BOB19922 APC c.8462A>G (p.Asp2821Gly)
BOB21973WB APC c.420G>C (p.Glu140Asp)
BOB20898WB APC c.95A>G (p.Asn32Ser)
BOB17786 APC c.7399C>A (p.Pro2467Thr)
BOB21159WB APC c.3511C>T (p.Arg1171Cys)
BOB21291WB APC c.4766G>A (p.Arg1589His)
BOB17786 APC c.5026A>G (p.Arg1676Gly)
BOB20049 APC c.5357G>A (p.Arg1786Lys)
BOB21384WB APC c.5357G>C (p.Arg1786Thr)
BOB24011 APC c.5503A>G (p.Arg1835Gly)
BOB16413 APC c.7589G>A (p.Arg2530Gln)
BOB17440 APC c.2717C>T (p.Ser906Phe)
BOB20365WB APC c.2725A>G (p.Thr909Ala)
BOB20054 APC c.3374T>C (p.Val1125Ala)
BOB18356 ATM c.1960C>A (p.Gln654Lys)
BOB21660WB ATM c.2096A>G (p.Glu699Gly)
BOB20412 ATM c.2275A>G (p.Ser759Gly)
BOB21410WB ATM c.2494C>T (p.Arg832Cys)
BOB22428WB ATM c.2494C>T (p.Arg832Cys)
BOB20047 ATM c.2552A>G (p.Asp851Gly)
BOB16447 ATM c.2699T>C (p.Met900Thr)
BOB17825 ATM c.3014A>G (p.Asn1005Ser)
BOB20403WB ATM c.3240C>A (p.Asp1080Glu)
BOB200138 ATM c.3467C>T (p.Thr1156Met)
BOB17688 ATM c.3590T>C (p.Val1197Ala)
BOB20212 ATM c.3925G>A (p.Ala1309Thr)
BOB21585WB ATM c.3925G>A (p.Ala1309Thr)
BOB21877WB ATM c.3993+5G>T
BOB21139WB ATM c.4148C>T (p.Ser1383Leu)
BOB21979WB ATM c.4324T>C (p.Tyr1442His)
BOB200137 ATM c.4375G>A (p.Gly1459Arg)
BOB22337WB ATM c.4388T>G (p.Phe1463Cys)
BOB24634 ATM c.4388T>G (p.Phe1463Cys)
BOB20412 ATM c.4420C>G (p.His1474Asp)
BOB20920WB ATM c.4424A>G (p.Tyr1475Cys)
BOB18118 ATM c.4709T>C (p.Val1570Ala)
BOB17701 ATM c.4949A>G (p.Asn1650Ser)
BOB20521WB ATM c.5693G>A (p.Arg1898Gln)
BOB17446 ATM c.6067G>A (p.Gly2023Arg)
BOB23405 ATM c.6067G>A (p.Gly2023Arg)
BOB18191 ATM c.6332A>G (p.His2111Arg)
BOB20888WB ATM c.6543G>T (p.Glu2181Asp)
BOB20885WB ATM c.6860G>C (p.Gly2287Ala)
BOB17443 ATM c.6919C>T (p.Leu2307Phe)
BOB21067WB ATM c.6919C>T (p.Leu2307Phe)
BOB21289WB ATM c.6919C>T (p.Leu2307Phe)
BOB21984WB ATM c.6919C>T (p.Leu2307Phe)
BOB17646 ATM c.7618G>A (p.Val2540Ile)
BOB20767WB ATM c.7740A>C (p.Arg2580Ser)
BOB17523 ATM c.7919C>T (p.Thr2640Ile)
BOB18813 ATM c.7988T>C (p.Val2663Ala)
BOB18356 ATM c.8147T>C (p.Val2716Ala)
BOB21385WB ATM c.8734A>G (p.Arg2912Gly)
BOB20044 ATM c.977T>C (p.Ile326Thr)
BOB21282WB BARD1 c.1042G>A (p.Val348Ile)
BOB20970WB BARD1 c.2183C>T (p.Ser728Phe)
BOB16447 BARD1 c.2282G>A (p.Ser761Asn)
BOB20049 BARD1 c.2282G>A (p.Ser761Asn)
BOB21068WB BARD1 c.2282G>A (p.Ser761Asn)
BOB21742WB BARD1 c.581G>A (p.Arg194Lys)
BOB20751WB BARD1 c.620A>G (p.Lys207Arg)
BOB20606WB BARD1 c.632T>C (p.Leu211Ser)
BOB22413WB BARD1 c.668A>G (p.Glu223Gly)
BOB200140 BARD1 c.716T>A (p.Leu239Gln)
BOB21660WB BARD1 c.841C>T (p.Pro281Ser)
BOB20049 BARD1 c.928T>G (p.Ser310Ala)
BOB17708 BMPR1A c.1327C>T (p.Arg443Cys)
BOB21384WB BMPR1A c.1327C>T (p.Arg443Cys)
BOB213892WB BMPR1A c.1327C>T (p.Arg443Cys)
BOB20235 BMPR1A c.560G>A (p.Arg187His)
BOB21048WB BMPR1A c.676-3A>C
BOB18108 BRCA1 c.1263A>C (p.Glu421Asp)
BOB21874WB BRCA1 c.5513T>A (p.Val1838Glu)
BOB18622 BRCA2 c.4901T>C (p.Phe1634Ser)
BOB23117WB BRCA2 c.7925T>G (p.Phe2642Cys)
BOB18803 BRCA2 c.7434A>C (p.Leu2478Phe)
BOB21143WB BRCA2 c.8902A>G (p.Thr2968Ala)
BOB20819WB BRIP1 c.1616G>A (p.Arg539Lys)
BOB17429 BRIP1 c.1899C>G (p.Ile633Met)
BOB17713 BRIP1 c.1899C>G (p.Ile633Met)
BOB20231 BRIP1 c.205+5G>A
BOB18605 BRIP1 c.2071A>C (p.Ile691Leu)
BOB22122WB BRIP1 c.2120G>A (p.Arg707His)
BOB20986WB BRIP1 c.262_264del (p.Cys88del)
BOB21880WB BRIP1 c.2830C>G (p.Gln944Glu)
BOB17212 BRIP1 c.337A>C (p.Thr113Pro)
BOB17786 BRIP1 c.3464G>A (p.Gly1155Glu)
BOB20223 BRIP1 c.3651G>T (p.Trp1217Cys)
BOB17776 BRIP1 c.380-17T>A
BOB20592WB BRIP1 c.728T>C (p.Ile243Thr)
BOB21143WB BRIP1 c.728T>C (p.Ile243Thr)
BOB21573WB BRIP1 c.778A>G (p.Thr260Ala)
BOB17377 BRIP1 c.790C>T (p.Arg264Trp)
BOB20756 BRIP1 c.790C>T (p.Arg264Trp)
BOB20988WB BRIP1 c.820A>G (p.Thr274Ala)
BOB18605 BRIP1 del exon 7
BOB21139WB CDH1 c.1090A>T (p.Thr364Ser)
BOB18734 CDH1 c.1297G>A (p.Asp433Asn)
BOB21048WB CDH1 c.2329G>A (p.Asp777Asn)
BOB18354 CDH1 c.499G>A (p.Glu167Lys)
BOB18287 CDH1 c.88C>A (p.Pro30Thr)
BOB21284WB CDK4 c.209A>G (p.Asn70Ser)
BOB18539 CDK4 c.820-15T>G
BOB21587WB CHEK2 c.1217G>A (p.Arg406His)
BOB17443 CHEK2 c.1283C>T (p.Ser428Phe)
BOB17433 CHEK2 c.1343T>G (p.Ile448Ser)
BOB20594WB CHEK2 c.1343T>G (p.Ile448Ser)
BOB200150 CHEK2 c.1558_1559insC (p.Lys520Thrfs*5)
BOB17184 CHEK2 c.190G>A (p.Glu64Lys)
BOB22413WB CHEK2 c.190G>A (p.Glu64Lys)
BOB18002 CHEK2 c.275C>T (p.Pro92Leu)
BOB18810 CHEK2 c.410G>A (p.Arg137Gln)
BOB17992 CHEK2 c.422A>C (p.Lys141Thr)
BOB18283 CHEK2 c.432T>G (p.Phe144Leu)
BOB21805WB CHEK2 c.470T>C (p.Ile157Thr)
BOB20237 CHEK2 c.499G>A (p.Gly167Arg)
BOB21046WB CHEK2 c.598G>A (p.Val200Ile)
BOB17828 CHEK2 c.715G>A (p.Glu239Lys)
BOB21787WB CHEK2 c.787G>C (p.Glu263Gln)
BOB21923WB CHEK2 c.931G>A (p.Asp311Asn)
BOB21384WB MLH1 dup entire MLH1 gene
BOB17691 MLH1 c.226G>A (p.Val76Ile)
BOB18664 MSH2 c.982G>C (p.Ala328Pro)
BOB17227 MSH2 c.944G>T (p.Gly315Val)
BOB20421WB MSH2 c.2458+6T>C
BOB18197 MSH2 c.835C>G (p.Leu279Val)
BOB17446 MSH2 c.775C>T (p.Pro259Ser)
BOB20874WB MSH2 c.2728C>A (p.Gln910Lys)
BOB17994 MSH2 c.440T>G (p.Val147Gly)
BOB17828 MSH6 c.3974_3976del (p.Lys1325del)
BOB20594WB MSH6 c.3294C>G (p.Cys1098Trp)
BOB18110 MSH6 c.1599G>C (p.Glu533Asp)
BOB16469 MSH6 c.3173-10C>A
BOB18399 MSH6 c.3801+5G>A
BOB21391WB MSH6 c.1793A>G (p.Lys598Arg)
BOB18268 MSH6 c.2225A>G (p.Asn742Ser)
BOB23707WB MSH6 c.41C>T (p.Ser14Phe)
BOB17777 MYH c.1013_1014delinsGC (p.Gln338delinsArg)
BOB20856WB MYH c.1013_1014delinsGC (p.Gln338delinsArg)
BOB20894WB MYH c.1013_1014delinsGC (p.Gln338delinsArg)
BOB18198 MYH c.821G>A (p.Arg274Gln)
BOB17696 MYH c.820C>T (p.Arg274Trp)
BOB17212 MYH c.1276C>T (p.Arg426Cys)
BOB18489 MYH c.1276C>T (p.Arg426Cys)
BOB200139 MYH c.305G>A (p.Ser102Asn)
BOB21157WB NBN c.1036G>A (p.Val346Met)
BOB20888WB NBN c.1354A>C (p.Thr452Pro)
BOB21973WB NBN c.1444A>G (p.Arg482Gly)
BOB24387 NBN c.1690G>A (p.Glu564Lys)
BOB17995 NBN c.1720T>A (p.Leu574Ile)
BOB18279 NBN c.1952C>T (p.Pro651Leu)
BOB18481 NBN c.643C>T (p.Arg215Trp)
BOB20974WB NBN c.643C>T (p.Arg215Trp)
BOB21578WB NBN c.643C>T (p.Arg215Trp)
BOB17928 P16 c.9_32del (p.Ala4_Pro11del)
BOB21134WB P16 c.430C>T (p.Arg144Cys)
BOB20888WB PALB2 c.400G>A (p.Asp134Asn)
BOB20592WB PALB2 c.656A>G (p.Asp219Gly)
BOB20988WB PALB2 c.656A>G (p.Asp219Gly)
BOB18125 PALB2 c.3037A>G (p.Ile1013Val)
BOB20870WB PALB2 c.3350+4A>G
BOB21672WB PALB2 c.298C>T (p.Leu100Phe)
BOB21660WB PALB2 c.1564C>T (p.Pro522Ser)
BOB20037 PALB2 c.22C>A (p.Pro8Thr)
BOB21587WB PALB2 c.109C>T (p.Arg37Cys)
BOB17440 PALB2 c.3296C>G (p.Thr1099Arg)
BOB18667 PALB2 c.950C>T (p.Thr317Ile)
BOB18594 PALB2 c.1430C>T (p.Thr477Ile)
BOB20237 PMS2 c.1092T>A (p.Asp364Glu)
BOB17523 PMS2 c.1417G>A (p.Glu473Lys)
BOB17824 PMS2 c.86G>C (p.Gly29Ala)
BOB20760WB PMS2 c.86G>C (p.Gly29Ala)
BOB24634 PMS2 c.53T>C (p.Ile18Thr)
BOB20970WB PMS2 c.935T>C (p.Met312Thr)
BOB21149WB PMS2 c.1723A>G (p.Asn575Asp)
BOB17523 PMS2 c.58C>G (p.Arg20Gly)
BOB20041 PMS2 c.1567T>A (p.Ser523Thr)
BOB17196 PMS2 c.2149G>A (p.Val717Met)
BOB20894WB PMS2 c.2149G>A (p.Val717Met)
BOB21149WB PMS2 c.2386G>A (p.Val796Ile)
BOB17992 PTEN c.210-7_210-3del
BOB20892WB RAD51C c.-13A>C
BOB20047 RAD51C c.428A>G (p.Gln143Arg)
BOB20233 RAD51C c.601C>G (p.Leu201Val)
BOB18416 RAD51C c.605A>G (p.Asp202Gly)
BOB18729 RAD51C c.752A>G (p.Asp251Gly)
BOB21394WB RAD51C c.790G>A (p.Gly264Ser)
BOB18729 RAD51C c.7G>A (p.Gly3Arg)
BOB20042 RAD51D c.491T>C (p.Leu164Pro)
BOB21149WB RAD51D c.620C>T (p.Ser207Leu)
BOB21391WB RAD51D c.972G>T (p.Gln324His)
BOB21979WB SMAD4 c.1448-18C>A
BOB18288 SMAD4 c.667+3G>A
BOB20958WB STK11 c.1040C>G (p.Ala347Gly)
BOB17218 STK11 c.1211C>T (p.Ser404Phe)
BOB18813 TP53 c.139C>T (p.Pro47Ser)
BOB22178WB TP53 c.139C>T (p.Pro47Ser)
BOB17207 TP53 c.329G>A (p.Arg110His)
BOB23508WB TP53 c.75-18T>G
BOB20974WB TP53 c.845G>A (p.Arg282Gln)
BOB20610WB TP53 c.877G>T (p.Gly293Trp)

Footnotes

See accompanying editorial on page 1433 and article on page 1455

Supported by grants from the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center Breast Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) (P50CA168504), the Susan F. Smith Center for Women’s Cancers Executive Council at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Myriad Genetics Laboratories, Inc. Myriad also conducted all germline blood testing free of charge for this retrospective study using the MyRisk assay.

Terms in blue are defined in the glossary, found at the end of this article and online at www.jco.org.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found in the article online at www.jco.org. Author contributions are found at the end of this article.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conception and design: Nadine Tung, Nancy U. Lin, Brian A. Allen, Anne-Renee Hartman, Eric P. Winer, Judy E. Garber

Financial support: Richard J. Wenstrup

Provision of study materials or patients: Nancy U. Lin, Eric P. Winer, Judy E. Garber

Collection and assembly of data: Nancy U. Lin, Eric P. Winer, Judy E. Garber

Data analysis and interpretation: Nadine Tung, Nancy U. Lin, John Kidd, Brian A. Allen, Nanda Singh, Richard J. Wenstrup, Anne-Renee Hartman, Judy E. Garber

Manuscript writing: All authors

Final approval of manuscript: All authors

AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Frequency of Germline Mutations in 25 Cancer Susceptibility Genes in a Sequential Series of Patients With Breast Cancer

The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or jco.ascopubs.org/site/ifc.

Nadine Tung

Research Funding: Myriad Genetics

Nancy U. Lin

No relationship to disclose

John Kidd

Employment: Myriad Genetics

Stock or Other Ownership: Myriad Genetics

Brian A. Allen

Employment: Myriad Genetics

Stock or Other Ownership: Myriad Genetics

Nanda Singh

Employment: Myriad Genetics

Stock or Other Ownership: Myriad Genetics

Richard J. Wenstrup

Employment: Myriad Genetics

Leadership: Myriad Genetics

Stock or Other Ownership: Myriad Genetics

Anne-Renee Hartman

Employment: Myriad Genetics

Stock or Other Ownership: Myriad Genetics

Eric P. Winer

No relationship to disclose

Judy E. Garber

Consulting or Advisory Role: Novartis (I), Pfizer (I), Pfizer, Sequenom, SV Life Sciences (I)

Research Funding: Myriad Genetics, Novartis (I), Pfizer (I), Ambry Laboratories

REFERENCES

  • 1.Risch HA, McLaughlin JR, Cole DE, et al. Population BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation frequencies and cancer penetrances: A kin-cohort study in Ontario, Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:1694–1706. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Begg CB, Haile RW, Borg A, et al. Variation of breast cancer risk among BRCA1/2 carriers. JAMA. 2008;299:194–201. doi: 10.1001/jama.2007.55-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chen S, Parmigiani G. Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1329–1333. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.1066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brose MS, Rebbeck TR, Calzone KA, et al. Cancer risk estimates for BRCA1 mutation carriers identified in a risk evaluation program. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:1365–1372. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.18.1365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.van der Kolk DM, de Bock GH, Leegte BK, et al. Penetrance of breast cancer, ovarian cancer and contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 families: High cancer incidence at older age. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;124:643–651. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0805-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Domchek SM, Friebel TM, Singer CF, et al. Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality. JAMA. 2010;304:967–975. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Finch AP, Lubinski J, Møller P, et al. Impact of oophorectomy on cancer incidence and mortality in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1547–1553. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.2820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Antoniou AC, Casadei S, Heikkinen T, et al. Breast-cancer risk in families with mutations in PALB2. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:497–506. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1400382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ramus SJ, Song H, Dicks E, et al. Germline mutations in the BRIP1, BARD1, PALB2, and NBN genes in women with ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107:pii: djv214. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rafnar T, Gudbjartsson DF, Sulem P, et al. Mutations in BRIP1 confer high risk of ovarian cancer. Nat Genet. 2011;43:1104–1107. doi: 10.1038/ng.955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Loveday C, Turnbull C, Ruark E, et al. Germline RAD51C mutations confer susceptibility to ovarian cancer. Nat Genet. 2012;44:475–476. doi: 10.1038/ng.2224. author reply 476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Song H, Dicks E, Ramus SJ, et al. Contribution of germline mutations in the RAD51B, RAD51C, and RAD51D genes to ovarian cancer in the population. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:2901–2907. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.2408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pelttari LM, Heikkinen T, Thompson D, et al. RAD51C is a susceptibility gene for ovarian cancer. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20:3278–3288. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Meindl A, Hellebrand H, Wiek C, et al. Germline mutations in breast and ovarian cancer pedigrees establish RAD51C as a human cancer susceptibility gene. Nat Genet. 2010;42:410–414. doi: 10.1038/ng.569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Loveday C, Turnbull C, Ramsay E, et al. Germline mutations in RAD51D confer susceptibility to ovarian cancer. Nat Genet. 2011;43:879–882. doi: 10.1038/ng.893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Churpek JE, Walsh T, Zheng Y, et al. Inherited predisposition to breast cancer among African American women. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;149:31–39. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-3195-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Couch FJ, Hart SN, Sharma P, et al. Inherited mutations in 17 breast cancer susceptibility genes among a large triple-negative breast cancer cohort unselected for family history of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:304–311. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.1414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kurian AW, Hare EE, Mills MA, et al. Clinical evaluation of a multiple-gene sequencing panel for hereditary cancer risk assessment. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:2001–2009. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.6607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tung N, Battelli C, Allen B, et al. Frequency of mutations in individuals with breast cancer referred for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing using next-generation sequencing with a 25-gene panel. Cancer. 2015;121:25–33. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Castéra L, Krieger S, Rousselin A, et al. Next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer using genomic capture targeting multiple candidate genes. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014;22:1305–1313. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Desmond A, Kurian AW, Gabree M, et al. Clinical actionability of multigene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk assessment. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:943–951. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp.
  • 23.Khatcheressian JL, Wolff AC, Smith TJ, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 update of the breast cancer follow-up and management guidelines in the adjuvant setting. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:5091–5097. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.8575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Judkins T, Leclair B, Bowles K, et al. Development and analytical validation of a 25-gene next generation sequencing panel that includes the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes to assess hereditary cancer risk. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:215. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1224-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405–424. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pruss D, Morris B, Hughes E, et al. Development and validation of a new algorithm for the reclassification of genetic variants identified in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;147:119–132. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-3065-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Eggington JM, Bowles KR, Moyes K, et al. A comprehensive laboratory-based program for classification of variants of uncertain significance in hereditary cancer genes. Clin Genet. 2014;86:229–237. doi: 10.1111/cge.12315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cancer Genome Atlas Network Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2012;490:61–70. doi: 10.1038/nature11412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Weischer M, Nordestgaard BG, Pharoah P, et al. CHEK2*1100delC heterozygosity in women with breast cancer associated with early death, breast cancer-specific death, and increased risk of a second breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:4308–4316. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.7336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Maxwell KN, Wubbenhorst B, D’Andrea K, et al. Prevalence of mutations in a panel of breast cancer susceptibility genes in BRCA1/2-negative patients with early-onset breast cancer. Genet Med. 2015;17:630–638. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tischkowitz M, Capanu M, Sabbaghian N, et al. Rare germline mutations in PALB2 and breast cancer risk: A population-based study. Hum Mutat. 2012;33:674–680. doi: 10.1002/humu.22022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cybulski C, Kluźniak W, Huzarski T, et al. Clinical outcomes in women with breast cancer and a PALB2 mutation: A prospective cohort analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:638–644. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70142-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kriege M, Hollestelle A, Jager A, et al. Survival and contralateral breast cancer in CHEK2 1100delC breast cancer patients: Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy. Br J Cancer. 2014;111:1004–1013. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sopik V, Akbari MR, Narod SA. Genetic testing for RAD51C mutations: In the clinic and community. Clin Genet. 2015;88:303–312. doi: 10.1111/cge.12548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Easton DF, Pharoah PD, Antoniou AC, et al. Gene-panel sequencing and the prediction of breast-cancer risk. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2243–2257. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1501341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tutt A, Robson M, Garber JE, et al. Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and advanced breast cancer: A proof-of-concept trial. Lancet. 2010;376:235–244. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60892-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gelmon KA, Hirte HW, Robidoux A, et al. Can we define tumors that will respond to PARP inhibitors? A phase II correlative study of olaparib in advanced serous ovarian cancer and triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28 (suppl; abstr 3002) [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Von Minckwitz G, Hahnen E, Fasching PA, et al. Pathological complete response (pCR) rates after carboplatin-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with germline BRCA (gBRCA) mutation and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): Results from GeparSixto. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32 (suppl; abstr 1005) [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Telli ML, Jensen KC, Kurian AW, et al. PrECOG 0105: Final efficacy results from a phase II study of gemcitabine (G) and carboplatin (C) plus iniparib (BSI-201) as neoadjuvant therapy for triple negative (TN) and BRCA1/2 mutation-associated breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.0085. (suppl; abstr 1003) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Atchley DP, Albarracin CT, Lopez A, et al. Clinical and pathologic characteristics of patients with BRCA-positive and BRCA-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:4282–4288. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bane AL, Beck JC, Bleiweiss I, et al. BRCA2 mutation-associated breast cancers exhibit a distinguishing phenotype based on morphology and molecular profiles from tissue microarrays. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31:121–128. doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000213351.49767.0f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Foulkes WD, Stefansson IM, Chappuis PO, et al. Germline BRCA1 mutations and a basal epithelial phenotype in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:1482–1485. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djg050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J, et al. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:8418–8423. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0932692100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Frank TS, Deffenbaugh AM, Reid JE, et al. Clinical characteristics of individuals with germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: Analysis of 10,000 individuals. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1480–1490. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.6.1480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Stat Fact Sheets SEER. Breast Cancer. http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html.
  • 46.Ratajska M, Antoszewska E, Piskorz A, et al. Cancer predisposing BARD1 mutations in breast-ovarian cancer families. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;131:89–97. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1403-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.De Brakeleer S, De Grève J, Loris R, et al. Cancer predisposing missense and protein truncating BARD1 mutations in non-BRCA1 or BRCA2 breast cancer families. Hum Mutat. 2010;31:E1175–E1185. doi: 10.1002/humu.21200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Seal S, Thompson D, Renwick A, et al. Truncating mutations in the Fanconi anemia J gene BRIP1 are low-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility alleles. Nat Genet. 2006;38:1239–1241. doi: 10.1038/ng1902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Pharoah PD, Guilford P, Caldas C. Incidence of gastric cancer and breast cancer in CDH1 (E-cadherin) mutation carriers from hereditary diffuse gastric cancer families. Gastroenterology. 2001;121:1348–1353. doi: 10.1053/gast.2001.29611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pilarsky C, Wenzig M, Specht T, et al. Identification and validation of commonly overexpressed genes in solid tumors by comparison of microarray data. Neoplasia. 2004;6:744–750. doi: 10.1593/neo.04277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Tan MH, Mester JL, Ngeow J, et al. Lifetime cancer risks in individuals with germline PTEN mutations. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:400–407. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hearle N, Schumacher V, Menko FH, et al. Frequency and spectrum of cancers in the Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:3209–3215. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lim W, Olschwang S, Keller JJ, et al. Relative frequency and morphology of cancers in STK11 mutation carriers. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:1788–1794. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Oncology are provided here courtesy of American Society of Clinical Oncology

RESOURCES