Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 May 19;6:26261. doi: 10.1038/srep26261

Legionella pneumophila strain associated with the first evidence of person-to-person transmission of Legionnaires’ disease: a unique mosaic genetic backbone

Vítor Borges 1,*, Alexandra Nunes 1,*, Daniel A Sampaio 2, Luís Vieira 2, Jorge Machado 3, Maria J Simões 4, Paulo Gonçalves 4, João P Gomes 1,a
PMCID: PMC4872527  PMID: 27196677

Abstract

A first strong evidence of person-to-person transmission of Legionnaires’ Disease (LD) was recently reported. Here, we characterize the genetic backbone of this case-related Legionella pneumophila strain (“PtVFX/2014”), which also caused a large outbreak of LD. PtVFX/2014 is phylogenetically divergent from the most worldwide studied outbreak-associated L. pneumophila subspecies pneumophila serogroup 1 strains. In fact, this strain is also from serogroup 1, but belongs to the L. pneumophila subspecies fraseri. Its genomic mosaic backbone reveals eight horizontally transferred regions encompassing genes, for instance, involved in lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis or encoding virulence-associated Dot/Icm type IVB secretion system (T4BSS) substrates. PtVFX/2014 also inherited a rare ~65 kb pathogenicity island carrying virulence factors and detoxifying enzymes believed to contribute to the emergence of best-fitted strains in water reservoirs and in human macrophages, as well as a inter-species transferred (from L. oakridgensis) ~37.5 kb genomic island (harboring a lvh/lvr T4ASS cluster) that had never been found intact within L. pneumophila species. PtVFX/2014 encodes another lvh/lvr cluster near to CRISPR-associated genes, which may boost L. pneumophila transition from an environmental bacterium to a human pathogen. Overall, this unique genomic make-up may impact PtVFX/2014 ability to adapt to diverse environments, and, ultimately, to be transmitted and cause human disease.


Legionnaires’ disease (LD) is a severe pneumonia with a case fatality rate of 8–12%, reaching higher values in elderly, smokers, and people with preexisting medical conditions, such as chronic cardiovascular or respiratory disease and diabetes1,2. LD is caused by Legionella spp., with L. pneumophila serogroup 1 accounting for most of the diagnosed cases3,4,5. L. pneumophila is a facultative intracellular Gram-negative aerobic bacterium that is widespread in nature, where water is its major reservoir, growing at the temperature range from 25 °C to 42 °C6. Transmission usually occurs by inhalation of aerosols or aspiration of water containing these bacteria6,7. Nevertheless, contrarily to what has been historically postulated, we have recently reported that person-to-person transmission of LD may occur8. LD has an incubation period typically ranging from 2–10 days, although longer and shorter periods have been described2. The vast majority of LD cases is sporadic, but large outbreaks may also occur9,10,11,12,13. The first reported outbreak dates back to 1976 and affected the members of an American Legion convention in Philadelphia, from which resulted the current disease designation14. The most common sources of outbreaks are contaminated cooling towers and hot water plumbing infrastructures, but decorative fountains, whirlpools or home showers15 have also been involved2. While the standardized sequence-based typing (SBT) has been useful for outbreak source identification and to study the molecular epidemiology of LD16,17, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is emerging as a more informative technology18,19,20,21 since it enables an in-depth investigation of outbreak-related strains and a higher resolution power for source attribution. It is also imperative to use WGS to deeply genetically characterize the strains associated with either endemic cases or large outbreaks. In fact, the conjugation of these two research areas (molecular epidemiology and comparative genomics) may considerably enhance our knowledge on LD and, thus, improve public health interventions.

One of the largest outbreaks of LD worldwide occurred in 2014 in Vila Franca de Xira (VFX), Portugal, yielding more than 400 cases and 14 deaths22. Epidemiological, environmental, microbiological and sequence-based molecular analyses traced industrial wet cooling systems as the potential source of infection and revealed that the outbreak-related strain (here designated PtVFX/2014) was a L. pneumophila serogroup 1 displaying the novel sequence type (ST) 190513. Remarkably, it was possible to implicate this L. pneumophila ST1905 strain into the strongest evidence to date of person-to-person transmission of LD8. Considering the huge genetic diversity within the L. pneumophila species11,23,24,25,26,27, marked by the presence of key virulence traits (like the well-described Dot/Icm type IVB secretion system – T4BSS) encoded in both core- and accessory-genomes28,29, we aimed to deeply characterize the genetic backbone of this novel person-to-person transmission- and outbreak-related strain by integrating it in the frame of the species phylogeny and diversity.

Results and Discussion

WGS-based outbreak investigation

In 2014, Portugal hosted the second largest outbreak worldwide of LD so far, which was caused by a novel ST1905 L. pneumophila serogroup 1 strain (PtVFX/2014) likely originated from local industrial cooling towers13. WGS was applied to strengthen the investigation of this LD outbreak as it provides a higher level of resolution than the traditional SBT scheme18,19,20,21, which is based on the sequence of seven loci (involving only ~2500 bp out of the ~3.4 Mbp of the L. pneumophila genome)16,17. The draft genome sequences of the outbreak-related strains were ~3.47 Mb in length. We found no nucleotide differences after performing pairwise comparisons between the environmental isolate and each clinical sample (using near-complete genome sequences; >99.7% of each draft genome), which suggested an industrial cooling tower as the potential source of the LD outbreak. The scenario of genomic identity among same-outbreak isolates observed here and in several other LD outbreaks is expected9,10,21, but contrasts with the recent findings described by Sánchez-Buso and colleagues12, who remarkably found non-clonal relationships among isolates epidemiologically linked to the same outbreak. In the LD outbreak occurred in Portugal, the observed clonality likely reflects the existence of a single physical environmental source with a L. pneumophila population markedly represented by the causative infection clone.

Of note, confirmation of the SBT-based ST1905 allelic profile highlighted a bias associated with the in silico extraction of the allele sequence from WGS data, as previously noticed by other authors18. In fact, the PtVFX/2014 strain displays two non-matching mompS copies (assigned with distinct allele numbers, 15 versus 7), which would hamper a proper ST attribution if the allelic profile was exclusively determined in silico.

Taken together, WGS enabled an in-depth investigation of the recent LD outbreak that occurred in Portugal, as it allowed the identification, with a high level of certainty, of an industrial cooling tower as the source of the epidemic.

SBT-based integration of PtVFX/2014 within the worldwide L. pneumophila genetic diversity

In order to integrate the novel ST1905 in the worldwide epidemiological picture of the L. pneumophila, the allelic profile of PtVFX/2014 was compared with all STs available at the European Working Group for Legionella Infections (EWGLI) SBT database16,17 (Fig. 1). ST1905 was found to differ just by one allele from ST154, ST159 and ST1127 (in mip locus), as well as from ST598 and ST1237 (in neuA locus). Nevertheless, these allelic profiles differ by seven to eight SNPs to ST1905, with exception of ST159 which displays only one nucleotide difference, being thus the closest ST to ST1905 (data not shown). No linkage can be made between the geographical source and the cluster enrolling these most close related STs, as isolates from these STs were already detected in worldwide spread countries (e.g., USA, Canada, UK, Italy, France, China, Japan, among others). For instance, ST159 has been described both in Europe and Asia.

Figure 1. SBT-based representation of the worldwide genetic diversity among L. pneumophila isolates.

Figure 1

Relationships between allelic profiles of 10085 isolates (from the EWGLI SBT database) are shown in a goeBURST full minimum spanning tree (MST) constructed using PHYLOViZ software. The MST connects the ST profiles in a way that the summed distance of all links of the tree is the minimum. STs are indicated by numbers within circles, where connecting lines are labeled with the number of allelic differences between STs. The cluster including the PtVFX/2014 ST1905 strain (in red) is zoomed, where STs found in more than one country are labeled with an asterisk. The matrix describes the ST profiles differing by a single allele from the ST1905.

Integration of the genetic backbone of the PtVFX/2014 strain in the frame of the species phylogeny and diversity

To get insight on the genetic backbone of the PtVFX/2014 strain and to infer its position within the phylogeny of L. pneumophila species, we constructed a core-genome alignment (encompassing both coding and non-coding regions) that comprises ~64% of the genome sequence of each of the 11 outbreak-associated clones and of the 24 selected publicly available strains. This comparative analysis enrolls isolates from different L. pneumophila subspecies (pneumophila, fraseri and pascullei) that were specifically selected in order to handle as much genetic diversity as possible. This contrasts with most of the genome-based comparative studies performed so far, which have been mainly focused on L. pneumophila subsp. pneumophila (mainly through the analysis of core genes)24,25,26,30,31.

Intriguingly, the serogroup 1 PtVFX/2014 clones were found to be phylogenetically close related with strains from L. pneumophila subsp. fraseri (Fig. 2A), and were clearly distinct from the most worldwide studied L. pneumophila serogroup 1 strains (Philadelphia-1, Paris, Lens, Corby, and 2300/99 Alcoy). For instance, we detected 224376 variant sites (within a ~87% core-genome) when comparing the PtVFX/2014 strain with the well-studied serogroup 1 L. pneumophila Philadelphia-1 strain, whereas the pairwise genome comparison against the most close related L. pneumophila subsp. fraseri ATCC33216 (or Dallas 1E) strain revealed just up to 17000 nucleotide differences within a ~98% core-genome. SNP density analysis throughout the genome revealed a non-random distribution, as those SNPs are clustered into eight distinct chromosome regions (Fig. 2A,B), which strongly suggests their inheritance by horizontal gene transfer (HGT). Overall, these HGT-inherited regions involve around 250 genes and represent ~8% of the genome length (Table 1). One of the clearest examples of a crossover region (affecting the gene lpg1817), where PtVFX/2014 genome abruptly exhibits a high concentration of homoplasic mutations, is shown in Supplementary Figure S1. This is not surprising as it is well-known that recombination events and HGT are major driving forces in shaping the highly dynamic L. pneumophila genomes12,23,24,25, with each strain possessing its own unique genomic mosaic as an outcome of its environmental context and its specific adaptive needs to infect different hosts or to persist in the environment32,33. For instance, recombination was found to be responsible for introducing genetic variation even in a L. pneumophila population markedly associated with recurrent outbreaks, with implications in public health interventions for outbreak investigation and source attribution12.

Figure 2. Phylogenomic analysis of PtVFX/2014 strain within the L. pneumophila species.

Figure 2

(A) A phylogenetic reconstruction enrolling genome sequences from 24 L. pneumophila strains and from 11 outbreak-associated PtVFX/2014 clones (ten clinical isolates plus one environmental isolate; in dark blue) is shown paired with the corresponding SNP density plot across the length of the genome. Serogroup (Sg) classification is also shown (see Supplementary Table S1 for details). The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths reflecting number of base substitutions per site. SNP density in the core-genome (~64% of the genome) is depicted proportionally to the color intensity and reflects SNPs against the genome of the L. pneumophila subsp. fraseri ATCC33216 strain (surrounded with a light blue box). Areas in grey refer to regions in the accessory genome. Genome orientation is according to that of the L. pneumophila Philadelphia-1 strain (GenBank accession number AE017354). (B) Detailed pairwise SNP density plot between PtVFX/2014 and the most close related L. pneumophila subsp. fraseri ATCC33216 strain showing putative HGT-inherited regions (labeled from A to H; see details in Table 1). Calculations of SNP density were performed across the genome alignment over a sliding window (window size = 25000 bp; step size = 25000 bp). Vertical dashed lines delimiting each region make the correspondence with the SNP density plot of panel (A).

Table 1. Description of HGT-inherited regions in PtVFX/2014.

Region Estimated length (Kbp) Genome location
Presence of Dot/Icm effectors coding genesc
Relevant genes includeda,d
lociPhiladelphia-1 straina loci PtVFX/2014b Philadelphia-1a PtVFX/2014b
A 113 lpg0831-lpg0723 PtVFX2014_03240-03730 lpg0733 PtVFX2014_03780 LPS biosynthesis loci (lpg0748-lpg0779)e (VFDB; 39); lpg0791/mip40; The iron assimilation- and virulence-associated lpg0746/iraAB locus (VFDB37;); lpg0742/ldsA38
B 21 lpg1025(yegE)-lpg0986 PtVFX2014_08445-08505 Genes potentially associated with resistance to antibiotics and toxic compounds
C 25 lpg1640-lpg1619(ftsl4) PtVFX2014_04280-04395 lpg1639; lpg1625; lpg1621 PtVFX2014_04285; PtVFX2014_04365; PtVFX2014_04385 MecI family transcriptional regulator associated with β-lactams resistance (lpg1620)
D 8 lpg1794-lpg1800(recX) PtVFX2014_11245-11275 lpg1798 PtVFX2014_11260 Transcriptional regulator LysR (lpg1796); Regulatory protein RecX (lpg1800).
E 33 lpg1817-lpg1845(vacJ) PtVFX2014_11360-11500 lpg1822; lpg1836 PtVFX2014_11385; PtVFX2014_11455 lpg1845/vacJ: encodes a lipoprotein associated with peptidoglycan stabilization (potential virulence factor in cell to cell migration36); lpg1818/msbA: encodes the Lipid A export ATP-binding/permease protein MsbA41
F 20 lpg2282(asnS)-lpg2262(ackA2) PtVFX2014_01325-01425 lpg2271 PtVFX2014_01380
G 34 lpg2462-lpg2426(mdcA) PtVFX2014_00340-00520 lpg2461; lpg2456; lpg2452; lpg2444; lpg2443; lpg2434; lpg2433 PtVFX2014_00345; PtVFX2014_00370; PtVFX2014_00395; PtVFX2014_00425; PtVFX2014_00430; PtVFX2014_00480; PtVFX2014_00485 lpg2438: encodes a florfenicol efflux pump
H 33 lpg2815-lpg2842(phoH) PtVFX2014_14890-15010 lpg2815; lpg2826; lpg2828; lpg2832 PtVFX2014_14890; PtVFX2014_14945; PtVFX2014_14955; PtVFX2014_14960 lpg2839/smpB (gene likely essential for viability of L. pneumophila42); lpg2825: gene associated with cold shock; lpg2841: putative antibiotic resistance-associated gene.

aLoci designations are based on the Philadelphia-1 strain genome annotation (GenBank accession number AE017354).

bLoci designations are based on the PtVFX/2014 strain genome annotation (GenBank accession number LORH00000000) (this study).

cPresence/absence analysis based on 303 known Dot/Icm substrates coding genes that were recently gathered in the literature for six sequenced L. pneumophila strains (Philadelphia-1, 2300/99 Alcoy, Corby, Paris, Lens and 130b).

dBased on specific literature and/or on the Virulence Factors Database (VFDB) (http://www.mgc.ac.cn/VFs/).

eCorrespond to the loci PtVFX2014_03470-03605. The genes lpg0778 and lpg0675 are absent in the PtVFX/2014 strain.

Among the loci imported from the detected HGT events in the PtVFX/2014 strain (Table 1), we highlight genes coding for proteins: i) from the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) biosynthesis cluster; ii) potentially associated with resistance to antibiotics and toxic compounds, or with iron acquisition; iii) that likely impact the bacterium ability to infect macrophages; and, iv) that are potentially essential for viability and cell to cell migration of L. pneumophila. Phylogenetic analysis of two genes (lpg0773/wzm and lpg0772/wzt) from the LPS cluster that have been used for genetic serogroup classification34,35 strongly sustains that the HGT inheritance of the LPS cluster is responsible for the serogroup 1 profile of PtVFX/2014 (Fig. 3). This is especially relevant since L. pneumophila serogroup 1 isolates are predominantly reported in LD cases worldwide3,5, although PtVFX/2014 is evolutionarily divergent from the L. pneumophila subsp. pneumophila serogroup 1 strains that have caused most of large outbreaks of LD described so far9,10,24,26,36. On the other hand, it corroborates that the LPS cluster determining serogroup 1 can be present in highly diverse genomic backbones, and that itself likely constitutes a major determinant of human disease35. It is also worth noting that this HGT-derived region also involves the inaAB locus, which was shown to be required for assimilation, intracellular infection and virulence37, as well as a gene (lpg0742/ldsA) coding for a protein that may affect virulence by interfering with the assembly and/or the activation of the Dot/Icm system38.

Figure 3. Genetic basis underlying the serogroup classification of PtVFX/2014.

Figure 3

Schematic non-scaled condensed trees showing the genetic relatedness among 25 L. pneumophila strains (Supplementary Table S1) based on the core-genome alignment from Fig. 2A (panel A), as well as on the individual alignments of two genes that have been applied for genetic serogroup classification: lpg0773/wzt (panel B) and lpg0772/wzm (panel C). For simplification purposes, only one clone of the serogroup 1 PtVFX/2014 strain is presented in all trees. The core-genome tree topology matches the one of Fig. 2A, while the lpg0773/wzt and lpg0772/wzm trees topologies were inferred in MEGA5 using the Neighbor-Joining method, with Kimura 2-parameter model for estimating evolutionary distances (Bootstrapping = 1000 replicates). Branches are colored according to the serogroup classification.

Also important was the exchange of multiple genes encoding substrates of the Dot/Icm T4BSS (Table 1). It is known that critical virulence traits of bacterial pathogens rely on a wide variety of secretion systems that translocate effector proteins into the host cell in order to promote infection and survival43,44, where the Dot/Icm T4BSS is the major essential virulence factor in L. pneumophila28,44,45. In this regard, those recombination events involving Dot/Icm T4BSS effectors may impact the PtVFX/2014 ability to infect, to be transmitted, and to cause disease. For instance, we highlight two exchanged Dot/Icm effectors (Lpg0733/RavH and Lpg2461) that were previously implicated in the modulation of eukaryotic vesicular trafficking46, and the protective B-cell antigen Lpg227147,48 (Table 1). Of note, multiple homoplasic mutations shared with the most worldwide studied outbreak-associated L. pneumophila serogroup 1 strains were detected in the genes encoding the Dot/Icm substrates Lpg2271 and Lpg1639. The mutational scenario observed for lpg1639 (Supplementary Fig. S2) was even more marked, since PtVFX/2014 is clearly divergent from the close-related strains from L. pneumophila subsp. fraseri or L. pneumophila subsp. pascullei in this gene. Given their relevance, a detailed description of the repertoire of known Dot/Icm effectors carried by the PtVFX/2014 strain is presented below. Taken together, these results point that the outbreak-related PtVFX/2014 strain acquired by HGT multiple genetic features that may be associated with specific virulence or transmission traits.

Other virulence-associated traits of the L. pneumophila PtVFX/2014 strain

It is well-known that the L. pneumophila genome is highly plastic, with an accessory genome marked by several pathogenicity islands, plasmid-like elements, phage-related genes and other virulence-associated loci potentially related to its ability to adapt and survive in diverse environments and to cause human disease12,20,24,25,49. From the inspection of the PtVFX/2014 accessory genome for either known genomic islands or strain-specific genetic traits, we highlight the presence of an ~37.5 kb region that was found to be intact and highly similar (BLASTn, cover 100%, identity 99%, E-value 0.0) in only one strain (ATCC 33761 = DSM 21215) of L. oakridgensis, a species that rarely causes LD50. The SNP density analysis throughout the core-genome alignment of L. pneumophila PTVFX/2014 versus L. oakridgensis ATCC 33761 (DSM 21215) (Fig. 4A) confirms the similarity, and clearly points that this region was acquired by inter-species HGT. It carries genes potentially involved in conjugation, such as a lvh/lvr cluster coding for a typical T4SS (T4ASS) and some tra conjugal transfer genes26,36,51, as well as a gene cluster homolog to a type I-like restriction-modification system. While the lvh/lvr T4ASS is thought to be involved in L. pneumophila entry, delay of phagosome acidification and intracellular multiplication, which are virulence-related mechanisms that may boost its transition from a environmental bacterium to a human pathogen52, little is known about the role of the restriction-modification systems in L. pneumophila, although they have been suggested to be involved in its adaptation to different environmental niches32,53. Noteworthy, this ~37.5 kb genomic island was not found to be intact in any L. pneumophila strain with the genome available at the GenBank (including the closest related L. pneumophila subsp. fraseri ATCC33216/Dallas 1E strain). In fact, BLASTn analyses of this island only revealed partial homology (cover < 67%, identity < 98%, E-value 0.0) mainly targeting the region involving the T4ASS lvh/lvr cluster in other L. pneumophila strains. However, this might be explained by the presence of T4ASS lvh/lvr cluster integrated in either other genomic islands or genome locations. This is not surprising as L. pneumophila genomes may carry more than one lvh/lvr T4ASS cluster27,30,31,36,49. Indeed, for instance, PtVFX2014 strain possesses an additional lvh/lvr T4ASS cluster upstream to this ~37.5 kb genomic island. Interestingly, in close proximity of this additional lvh/lvr cluster, we detected three genes (PtVFX2014_08925/cas1, PtVFX2014_08930/cas2 and PtVFX2014_08930/cas4) associated with the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) system (CRISPR-associated genes – cas). The CRISPR-Cas system is a RNA-mediated immunity system used by some bacteria to resist to phages and other invading DNA54. In L. pneumophila, although little is known about the impact of the CRISPR system on regulation of virulence-related traits55, it has been demonstrated that the CRISPR-associated gene cas2 of L. pneumophila strain 130b is required for intracellular infection of amoebae, indicating that it might play a role in the environment persistence and transmission of LD56. Of note, cas genes in the PTVFX/2014 strain resemble those annotated in the L. pneumophila strains 130 b and Paris26,27, but not in the 2300/99 Alcoy and Lens strains55.

Figure 4. Relevant putative pathogenicity islands inherited by PtVFX/2014.

Figure 4

(A) The graph shows the SNP density across a core-genome alignment (encompassing about 39–49% of each whole-genome sequence) between PtVFX/2014 and the L. oakridgensis ATCC 33761 (or DSM 21215) strain over a sliding window (window size = 38000 bp; step size = 38000 bp). Both gene content and organization of the ~37.5 kb genomic island is highlighted above the graph, where the lvh/lvr cluster is shown in black arrows, while the gene cluster homolog to a type I-like restriction-modification system is displayed in white arrows. (B) The graph shows the SNP density across a core-genome alignment (encompassing about 86–88% of each whole-genome sequence) between PtVFX/2014 and the L. pneumophila Philadelphia-1 strain over a slinding window (window size = 20000 bp; step size = 20000 bp). Gene organization of the ~65 kb genomic island is highlighted above the graph. For both graphs, core-genome alignments were extracted (using MAUVE software) by keeping and concatenating regions where genomes aligned over at least 500 bp, x-axis do not reflect any genome orientation. Genes delimiting each genomic island are labeled in each panel.

Another relevant feature of PtVFX/2014 is the presence of a ~65 kb pathogenicity island that was previously reported to be absent in the most worldwide studied L. pneumophila strains24,57, with exception of the Philadelphia-1 strain, in which it was firstly found58. Like above, this PtVFX/2014 island was likely imported via HGT, being highly similar (Fig. 4B) to the one described in the Philadelphia-1 strain58. This island was recently found to mediate oxidative stress resistance in vitro and in macrophages57, carrying a plasmid F-like element comprising homologs of the T4SS (tra/trb genes), a prpA-lvrABC gene cluster (PtVFX2014_07415-PtVFX2014_07430), several membrane transporters, and multiple other potential virulence factors58. For instance, it harbors a homolog of an efflux pump YdhE/NorM belonging to the multidrug and toxin extrusion (MATE) family (PtVFX2014_07605), which has been associated with resistance to several antimicrobial agents in other bacteria59, and a gene encoding a macrophage infectivity potentiator-related protein (lpg2112/PtVFX2014_07340)32,60. The prpA-lvrABC gene cluster includes a csrA paralog (lpg2094/PtVFX2014_07430) encoding a RNA-binding protein that belongs to a superfamily of global regulators that are widely distributed among bacterial species. In L. pneumophila, CsrA-like proteins have been implicated in several mechanisms, including the bacterial switch to a resilient state yielding persistence in water supplies or the regulation of the transition between the replicative and transmissive phases of its pathogenic life cycle46,61,62,63. In conclusion, similarly to the outbreak-related Philadelphia-1 strain, the presence of this island endows PtVFX/2014 with machinery for excision and transfer as well as with a number of putative virulence factors and detoxifying enzymes that are believed to contribute to the emergence and persistence of best-fitted strains in natural or human-built water reservoirs and in human macrophages57,58.

Repertoire of Dot/Icm T4BSS substrates in PtVFX/2014 strain

L. pneumophila encodes over 300 Dot/Icm T4BSS effectors that are translocated during the bacterial life-cycle into the host cell to subvert cellular functions, and thus, assuring intracellular survival and replication47,49,64,65. For instance, Dot/Icm effectors have been implicated in the bacterial uptake into the host cells, evasion of lysosome fusion, recruitment of host vesicles, lipid remodeling of the Legionella-containing vacuole, modulation of important cellular pathways (such as the host ubiquitin pathways) or host cell exit29,66,67,68. The majority of Dot/Icm effectors are shared by most L. pneumophila strains sequenced so far47,49,64,65. Nevertheless, there are still a considerable number of effectors that have been suggested to be present in just few strains or even to be strain-specific, making the investigation of the repertoire of Dot/Icm T4BSS effectors encoded in novel sequenced genomes important to understand potential strain-specific virulence or transmission traits.

In this regard, we screened the PtVFX/2014 genome for the presence/absence of 303 known Dot/Icm substrates coding genes that were recently gathered in the literature for six sequenced L. pneumophila strains (Philadelphia-1, 2300/99 Alcoy, Corby, Paris, Lens and 130b)49,64. This kind of presence/absence analysis has been mostly based on pairwise comparisons with data from the L. pneumophila Philadelphia-1 strain, so potential Dot/Icm effectors identified for the other sequenced strains were also not taken into account in the current study. Overall, 232 out of the 303 Dot/Icm substrates (~77%) are shared by the seven strains (Supplementary Table S2), which corroborates previous comparisons47,49,64,65. This observation gains even more relevance, since PVFX/2014 belongs to L. pneumophila subsp. fraseri, being phylogenetically distant from the strains used so far for Dot/Icm make-up comparisons. Thus, it is tempting to speculate that this set of ~230 shared substrates may constitute the “core” Dot/Icm arsenal within the L. pneumophila species.

Regarding PtVFX/2014, we identified 257 known Dot/Icm substrates (Supplementary Table S2), whose repertoire is most similar to the one carried by the L. pneumophila Paris strain (Fig. 5), differing by only 8% (22/276) of the substrates. In particular, PtVFX/2014 exclusively shares the Dot/Icm effector coding gene lpp2486/PtVFX2014_00550 with the Paris strain, which encodes an eukaryotic-like protein with an N-terminal F-box domain and a C-terminal coiled-coil motif that may play an important role in infection of Acanthamoeba castellanii and human macrophages69. Besides this substrate, we found just another Dot/Icm exclusively shared by PtVFX/2014 and a single strain, namely the gene PtVFX2014_12325 homolog of the lpg0402/ankY/legA9 of the Philadelphia-1 strain, which encodes a protein with an ankyrin motif. Despite its functional role is still unknown, ankyrin-containing proteins are thought to be important for L. pneumophila infection of eukaryotic host cells70. Indeed, AnkY/LegA9 was suggested to be involved in autophagy uptake of Legionella-containing vacuole and avoidance of lysosomal fusion71.

Figure 5. Repertoire of Dot/Icm T4BSS substrates in PtVFX/2014 strain.

Figure 5

(A) Venn diagram [constructed using jvenn] showing the distribution of 303 known Dot/Icm substrates among six L. pneumophila strains. Given that any counting of strain-specific substrates would be an underestimation (as deep functional studies have not been systematically performed for all strains), those substrates were labeled with a question mark, except for the Philadelphia-1 strain as it was used as a query in the pairwise comparisons. Corby strain is not represented in the Venn diagram as it possesses a Dot/Icm repertoire almost identical to that of Alcoy. The only exceptions occur in the genes lpg0080 and lpg1965, which are absent in Corby (lpg0080 is also absent in Lens, whereas lpg1965 is present in 130b and Philadelphia-1 besides 2300/99 Alcoy). Details regarding the Dot/Icm make-up of each strain are given in Supplementary Table S2. (B) goeBURST full minimum spanning tree showing that PtVFX/2014 (in red) carries a unique the Dot/Icm repertoire. Relationships based on the Dot/Icm make-up among strains were estimated using the goeBURST algorithm implemented in the PHYLOViZ software. Connecting lines are labeled with the number of Dot/Icm substrates differences between each strain. (C) Pairwise matrix displaying the number of Dot/Icm substrates that are shared (light red) or divergent (light blue) among strains. Diagonal values (in grey) represent the total number of Dot/Icm substrates inferred for each strain.

We cannot discard that PTVFX/2014 carries additional Dot/Icm substrates as, for instance, deep analysis of the recently sequenced 130b strain revealed the presence of 10 novel effectors (not addressed in Supplementary Table S2)27, where four of which (lpw_00581, lpw_16311, lpw_20091 and lpw_25791) are also encoded in the PtVFX/2014 genome. Moreover, we detected some PtVFX/2014-exclusive genes that are adjacent to known Dot/Icm coding genes. One of those examples refers to PtVFX2014_10440 (coding for a hypothetical protein), which is flanked by the two dot/icm genes lpg0171/legU1 and lpg0172. Whether these exclusive genes constitute novel L. pneumophila Dot/Icm substrates cannot be stated, although they may constitute potential targets for future functional studies, since dot/icm genes often appear in clusters spread throughout the genome. Similarly to what has been shown for other L. pneumophila strains, the novel outbreak-related PtVFX/2014 strain revealed a unique composition of Dot/Icm effectors that may underlie a distinct virulence profile.

Overall, in this study, we analyzed the genetic backbone of the PtVFX/2014 strain, which was associated with the first strong evidence of person-to-person transmission and with the second worldwide largest outbreak of LD so far. Comparative genomics revealed that PtVFX/2014 possesses a unique genomic make-up, marked by relevant HGT events enrolling multiple virulence factors, which endow it with specific traits that may impact its ability to adapt and persist in diverse environments, and, ultimately, to be transmitted and to cause human disease. It is our goal to apply phenotypic approaches to dissect, in near future, the transmission and virulence skills of PtVFX/2014 strain.

Methods

WGS for outbreak investigation

To investigate the genetic relatedness of ST1905 isolates and to confirm the source of LD outbreak occurred in Portugal, 10 clinical isolates and one environmental isolate obtained from an industrial cooling tower were selected for WGS. Briefly, high-quality genomic DNA samples from pure bacterial cultures of both the clinical and the environmental isolates were used to prepare Nextera XT Illumina libraries that were subjected to paired-end sequencing (2 × 150 bp) on a MiSeq system (Illumina Inc.), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, using a depth of coverage >100-fold for all samples. Obtained reads were subjected to quality assessment and improvement (using FastQC and FASTX tools), and further assembled using the Velvet version 1.2.10 (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/~zerbino/velvet/). The de novo assembly process was optimized using the VelvetOptimiser script version 2.2.5. To study the genetic relatedness between each clinical isolate and the environmental isolate, a pairwise strategy was used in order to maximize the extent of core-genome to be compared. Briefly, pairwise alignments of the draft genome sequences were performed using the progressive algorithm of Mauve software (version 2.3.1) (http://darlinglab.org/mauve/mauve.html), and core-alignments were extracted by keeping and concatenating regions where sequences aligned over at least 500 bp. Both DnaSP v5 (http://www.ub.edu/dnasp/) and MEGA5 (http://www.megasoftware.net/) software were then used to check potential nucleotide variants, with Tablet 1.14.04.10 (https://ics.hutton.ac.uk/tablet/) being further applied to exclude false positive polymorphisms.

goeBURST analysis based on allelic profiles of L. pneumophila STs

The European Working Group for Legionella Infections (EWGLI) SBT database (http://www.ewgli.org/)16,17 included data of 10085 isolates (with ST attributed) from 60 countries representing 2108 distinct STs, at the time this analysis was conducted (24.11.2015). To display the relationships between the allelic profile of ST1905 and the other STs described worldwide, we constructed a goeBURST full minimum spanning tree (MST)72 implemented in the PHYLOViZ software73.

Whole-genome comparative analyses within the L. pneumophila species

To integrate the genetic backbone of the L. pneumophila PtVFX/2014 strain in the frame of the species phylogeny, 10 close chromosome sequences (including those from the most studied outbreak-associated L. pneumophila serogroup 1 strains), four draft genomes from L. pneumophila subspecies other than the L. pneumophila subsp. pneumophila available at GenBank, and sequence data (retrieved from European Nucleotide Archive) from 10 isolates selected for increasing genetic diversity (see Supplementary Table S1) were also analyzed. This selection criterion allowed us to work with the 15 highly diverse phylogenetic clusters described by Underwood and colleagues20. A core-genome alignment (enrolling a total of 35 genome sequences) followed by phylogenetic inferences were performed with Parsnp implemented on Harvest suite74, using the default parameters, with exception of parameter –C, which was adjusted to 2000 in order to maximize the reference coverage. Whole-genome pairwise alignments performed using the progressive algorithm of MAUVE 2.3.1 software were also analyzed through the DnaSP v5 software in order to identify genomic regions with high single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) density. SimPlot/BootScan software (http://sray.med.som.jhmi.edu/SCRoftware/simplot/) was used to precisely identify breakpoint regions of putative recombination events. Multiple additional MAUVE alignments, RAST (http://rast.nmpdr.org/) and BLAST analyses were also performed to characterize the genome of the outbreak-associated ST1905 strain in regard to the presence of specific genomic islands, plasmids, prophages, virulence factors, and other relevant features.

Genetic analysis of wzt and wzm loci

In order to investigate the genetic basis determining the serogroup type of the strain PtVFX/2014 (serogroup 1), we analyzed the nucleotide sequences of two genes (wzt and wzm) belonging to the lipopolysaccaride (LPS) cluster of L. pneumophila39, since these loci were found to be good genetic markers for discriminating L. pneumophila serogroups34,35. In this regard, phylogenetic reconstructions over individual gene alignments were performed through MEGA5 by using the neighbor-joining method with bootstrapping (1000 replicates) and the Kimura-2-parameter for distance estimates.

Nucleotide sequence accession number

A draft genome sequence of one representative clone of the outbreak-related ST1905 strain (PtVFX/2014) was submitted to GenBank, annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genomes Annotation Pipeline 2.3, and is available under the accession number LORH00000000. Raw sequence reads of each PtVFX/2014 strain were deposited in Sequence Read Archive (SRA) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra) under the accession numbers: SRR3176625, SRR3176631, SRR3176714, SRR3176716, SRR3176831, SRR3176838, SRR3176884, SRR3176894, SRR3176900, SRR3176901 and SRR3176904.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Borges, V. et al. Legionella pneumophila strain associated with the first evidence of person-to-person transmission of Legionnaires’ disease: a unique mosaic genetic backbone. Sci. Rep. 6, 26261; doi: 10.1038/srep26261 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep26261-s1.pdf (589.6KB, pdf)

Footnotes

Author Contributions V.B., A.N. and J.P.G. conceived the study design and wrote the manuscript, V.B., A.N., D.A.S., L.V., J.M., M.J.S. and P.G. performed the experiments. All authors discussed the results and reviewed the manuscript.

References

  1. Dominguez A. et al. Factors influencing the case-fatality rate of Legionnaires’ disease. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 13, 407–412 (2009). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Phin N. et al. Epidemiology and clinical management of Legionnaires’ disease. Lancet Infect Dis 14, 1011–1021 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Yu V. L. et al. Distribution of Legionella species and serogroups isolated by culture in patients with sporadic community-acquired legionellosis: an international collaborative survey. J Infect Dis 186, 127–128 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Legionellosis–United States, 2000–2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 60, 1083–1086 (2011). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Legionnaires’ disease in Europe, 2012. (ECDC, Stockholm, 2014).
  6. Fields B. S., Benson R. F. & Besser R. E. Legionella and Legionnaires’ disease: 25 years of investigation. Clin Microbiol Rev 15, 506–526 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Muder R. R., Yu V. L. & Woo A. H. Mode of transmission of Legionella pneumophila. A critical review. Arch Intern Med 146, 1607–1612 (1986). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Correia A. M. et al. Probable Person-to-Person Transmission of Legionnaires’ Disease. N Engl J Med 374, 497–498 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Garcia-Fulgueiras A. et al. Legionnaires’ disease outbreak in Murcia, Spain. Emerg Infect Dis 9, 915–921 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Levesque S. et al. Genomic characterization of a large outbreak of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 strains in Quebec City, 2012. Plos One 9, e103852 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McAdam P. R. et al. Gene flow in environmental Legionella pneumophila leads to genetic and pathogenic heterogeneity within a Legionnaires’ disease outbreak. Genome Biol 15, 504 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sanchez-Buso L., Comas I., Jorques G. & Gonzalez-Candelas F. Recombination drives genome evolution in outbreak-related Legionella pneumophila isolates. Nat Genet 46, 1205–1211 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Shivaji T. et al. A large community outbreak of Legionnaires disease in Vila Franca de Xira, Portugal, October to November 2014. Euro Surveill 19, 20991 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fraser D. W. et al. Legionnaires’ disease: description of an epidemic of pneumonia. N Engl J Med 297, 1189–1197 (1977). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. van Heijnsbergen E. et al. Confirmed and Potential Sources of Legionella Reviewed. Environ Sci Technol 49, 4797–4815 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gaia V. et al. Consensus sequence-based scheme for epidemiological typing of clinical and environmental isolates of Legionella pneumophila. J Clin Microbiol 43, 2047–2052 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ratzow S., Gaia V., Helbig J. H., Fry N. K. & Luck P. C. Addition of neuA, the gene encoding N-acylneuraminate cytidylyl transferase, increases the discriminatory ability of the consensus sequence-based scheme for typing Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 strains. J Clin Microbiol 45, 1965–1968 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Moran-Gilad J. et al. Design and application of a core genome multilocus sequence typing scheme for investigation of Legionnaires’ disease incidents. Euro Surveill 20, 21186 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Reuter S. et al. A pilot study of rapid whole-genome sequencing for the investigation of a Legionella outbreak. BMJ Open 3, e002175 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Underwood A. P., Jones G., Mentasti M., Fry N. K. & Harrison T. G. Comparison of the Legionella pneumophila population structure as determined by sequence-based typing and whole genome sequencing. BMC Microbiol 13, 302 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Graham R. M., Doyle C. J. & Jennison A. V. Real-time investigation of a Legionella pneumophila outbreak using whole genome sequencing. Epidemiol Infect 142, 2347–2351 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pinto C. S. A large outbreak of Legionnaires’ Disease in Vila Franca de Xira, Portugal. Paper presented at Third Annual Scientific Conference of the the European Working Group for Legionella Infections (ESCMID) Study Group for Legionella infections (ESGLI) (ESGLI 2015), ESCMID. London. 2015, 16–17 September.
  23. Gomez-Valero L. et al. Extensive recombination events and horizontal gene transfer shaped the Legionella pneumophila genomes. BMC Genomics 12, 536 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. D’Auria G., Jimenez-Hernandez N., Peris-Bondia F., Moya A. & Latorre A. Legionella pneumophila pangenome reveals strain-specific virulence factors. BMC Genomics 11, 181 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Coscolla M., Comas I. & Gonzalez-Candelas F. Quantifying nonvertical inheritance in the evolution of Legionella pneumophila. Mol Biol Evol 28, 985–1001 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Cazalet C. et al. Evidence in the Legionella pneumophila genome for exploitation of host cell functions and high genome plasticity. Nat Genet 36, 1165–1173 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Schroeder G. N. et al. Legionella pneumophila strain 130b possesses a unique combination of type IV secretion systems and novel Dot/Icm secretion system effector proteins. J Bacteriol 192, 6001–6016 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ensminger A. W. & Isberg R. R. Legionella pneumophila Dot/Icm translocated substrates: a sum of parts. Curr Opin Microbiol 12, 67–73 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Luo Z. Q. & Isberg R. R. Multiple substrates of the Legionella pneumophila Dot/Icm system identified by interbacterial protein transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101, 841–846 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Glockner G. et al. Identification and characterization of a new conjugation/type IVA secretion system (trb/tra) of Legionella pneumophila Corby localized on two mobile genomic islands. Int J Med Microbiol 298, 411–428 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Steinert M., Heuner K., Buchrieser C., Albert-Weissenberger C. & Glockner G. Legionella pathogenicity: genome structure, regulatory networks and the host cell response. Int J Med Microbiol 297, 577–587 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jules M. & Buchrieser C. Legionella pneumophila adaptation to intracellular life and the host response: clues from genomics and transcriptomics. FEBS Lett 581, 2829–2838 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hilbi H., Hoffmann C. & Harrison C. F. Legionella spp. outdoors: colonization, communication and persistence. Environ Microbiol Rep 3, 286–296 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Cao B., Yao F., Liu X., Feng L. & Wang L. Development of a DNA microarray method for detection and identification of all 15 distinct O-antigen forms of Legionella pneumophila. Appl Environ Microbiol 79, 6647–6654 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Cazalet C. et al. Multigenome analysis identifies a worldwide distributed epidemic Legionella pneumophila clone that emerged within a highly diverse species. Genome Res 18, 431–441 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Chien M. et al. The genomic sequence of the accidental pathogen Legionella pneumophila. Science 305, 1966–1968 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Viswanathan V. K., Edelstein P. H., Pope C. D. & Cianciotto N. P. The Legionella pneumophila iraAB locus is required for iron assimilation, intracellular infection, and virulence. Infect Immun 68, 1069–1079 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Vincent C. D. et al. Identification of non-dot/icm suppressors of the Legionella pneumophila DeltadotL lethality phenotype. J Bacteriol 188, 8231–8243 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Petzold M. et al. A structural comparison of lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis loci of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 strains. BMC Microbiol 13, 198 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wintermeyer E. et al. Influence of site specifically altered Mip proteins on intracellular survival of Legionella pneumophila in eukaryotic cells. Infect Immun 63, 4576–4583 (1995). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Shevchuk O., Jager J. & Steinert M. Virulence properties of the Legionella pneumophila cell envelope. Front Microbiol 2, 74 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Charpentier X., Faucher S. P., Kalachikov S. & Shuman H. A. Loss of RNase R induces competence development in Legionella pneumophila. J Bacteriol 190, 8126–8136 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Cornelis G. R. The type III secretion injectisome. Nat Rev Microbiol 4, 811–825 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Isberg R. R., O’Connor T. J. & Heidtman M. The Legionella pneumophila replication vacuole: making a cosy niche inside host cells. Nat Rev Microbiol 7, 13–24 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ninio S. & Roy C. R. Effector proteins translocated by Legionella pneumophila: strength in numbers. Trends Microbiol 15, 372–380 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Nevo O., Zusman T., Rasis M., Lifshitz Z. & Segal G. Identification of Legionella pneumophila effectors regulated by the LetAS-RsmYZ-CsrA regulatory cascade, many of which modulate vesicular trafficking. J Bacteriol 196, 681–692 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhu W. et al. Comprehensive identification of protein substrates of the Dot/Icm type IV transporter of Legionella pneumophila. PLoS One 6, e17638 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Weber S. S. et al. Identification of protective B cell antigens of Legionella pneumophila. J Immunol 189, 841–849 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Gomez-Valero L. et al. Comparative analyses of Legionella species identifies genetic features of strains causing Legionnaires’ disease. Genome Biol 15, 505 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Brzuszkiewicz E. et al. Legionella oakridgensis ATCC 33761 genome sequence and phenotypic characterization reveals its replication capacity in amoebae. Int J Med Microbiol 303, 514–528 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Segal G., Russo J. J. & Shuman H. A. Relationships between a new type IV secretion system and the icm/dot virulence system of Legionella pneumophila. Mol Microbiol 34, 799–809 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Bandyopadhyay P., Liu S., Gabbai C. B., Venitelli Z. & Steinman H. M. Environmental mimics and the Lvh type IVA secretion system contribute to virulence-related phenotypes of Legionella pneumophila. Infect Immun 75, 723–735 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Marra A. & Shuman H. A. Isolation of a Legionella pneumophila restriction mutant with increased ability to act as a recipient in heterospecific matings. J Bacteriol 171, 2238–2240 (1989). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Horvath P. & Barrangou R. CRISPR/Cas, the immune system of bacteria and archaea. Science 327, 167–170 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Faucher S. P. & Shuman H. A. Small Regulatory RNA and Legionella pneumophila. Front Microbiol 2, 98 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Gunderson F. F. & Cianciotto N. P. The CRISPR-associated gene cas2 of Legionella pneumophila is required for intracellular infection of amoebae. MBio 4, e00074–00013 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Flynn K. J. & Swanson M. S. Integrative conjugative element ICE-betaox confers oxidative stress resistance to Legionella pneumophila in vitro and in macrophages. MBio 5, e01091–01014 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Brassinga A. K. et al. A 65-kilobase pathogenicity island is unique to Philadelphia-1 strains of Legionella pneumophila. J Bacteriol 185, 4630–4637 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Long F., Rouquette-Loughlin C., Shafer W. M. & Yu E. W. Functional cloning and characterization of the multidrug efflux pumps NorM from Neisseria gonorrhoeae and YdhE from Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52, 3052–3060 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Miyamoto H. et al. Protein profiles of Legionella pneumophila Philadelphia-1 grown in macrophages and characterization of a gene encoding a novel 24 kDa Legionella protein. Microb Pathog 15, 469–484 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Abbott Z. D., Yakhnin H., Babitzke P. & Swanson M. S. csrR, a paralog and direct target of CsrA, promotes Legionella pneumophila resilience in water. MBio 6, e00595 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Forsbach-Birk V., McNealy T., Shi C., Lynch D. & Marre R. Reduced expression of the global regulator protein CsrA in Legionella pneumophila affects virulence-associated regulators and growth in Acanthamoeba castellanii. Int J Med Microbiol 294, 15–25 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Molofsky A. B. & Swanson M. S. Legionella pneumophila CsrA is a pivotal repressor of transmission traits and activator of replication. Mol Microbiol 50, 445–461 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Gomez-Valero L., Rusniok C., Cazalet C. & Buchrieser C. Comparative and functional genomics of Legionella identified eukaryotic like proteins as key players in host-pathogen interactions. Front Microbiol 2, 208 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Lifshitz Z. et al. Computational modeling and experimental validation of the Legionella and Coxiella virulence-related type-IVB secretion signal. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, E707–715 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. de Felipe K. S. et al. Legionella eukaryotic-like type IV substrates interfere with organelle trafficking. PLoS Pathog 4, e1000117 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Ge J. & Shao F. Manipulation of host vesicular trafficking and innate immune defence by Legionella Dot/Icm effectors. Cell Microbiol 13, 1870–1880 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Isaac D. T. & Isberg R. Master manipulators: an update on Legionella pneumophila Icm/Dot translocated substrates and their host targets. Future Microbiol 9, 343–359 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Lomma M. et al. The Legionella pneumophila F-box protein Lpp2082 (AnkB) modulates ubiquitination of the host protein parvin B and promotes intracellular replication. Cell Microbiol 12, 1272–1291 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Pan X., Luhrmann A., Satoh A., Laskowski-Arce M. A. & Roy C. R. Ankyrin repeat proteins comprise a diverse family of bacterial type IV effectors. Science 320, 1651–1654 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Khweek A. A. et al. A bacterial protein promotes the recognition of the Legionella pneumophila vacuole by autophagy. Eur J Immunol 43, 1333–1344 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Francisco A. P., Bugalho M., Ramirez M. & Carrico J. A. Global optimal eBURST analysis of multilocus typing data using a graphic matroid approach. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 152 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Francisco A. P. et al. PHYLOViZ: phylogenetic inference and data visualization for sequence based typing methods. BMC Bioinformatics 13, 87 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Treangen T. J., Ondov B. D., Koren S. & Phillippy A. M. The Harvest suite for rapid core-genome alignment and visualization of thousands of intraspecific microbial genomes. Genome Biol 15, 524 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep26261-s1.pdf (589.6KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES