Skip to main content
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine logoLink to American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
. 2016 May 15;193(10):1134–1142. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201508-1633OC

Long-Term Ozone Exposure and Mortality in a Large Prospective Study

Michelle C Turner 1,2,3,4,, Michael Jerrett 5, C Arden Pope III 6, Daniel Krewski 1,7, Susan M Gapstur 8, W Ryan Diver 8, Bernardo S Beckerman 5, Julian D Marshall 9, Jason Su 5, Daniel L Crouse 10, Richard T Burnett 11
PMCID: PMC4872664  PMID: 26680605

Abstract

Rationale: Tropospheric ozone (O3) is potentially associated with cardiovascular disease risk and premature death. Results from long-term epidemiological studies on O3 are scarce and inconclusive.

Objectives: In this study, we examined associations between chronic ambient O3 exposure and all-cause and cause-specific mortality in a large cohort of U.S. adults.

Methods: Cancer Prevention Study II participants were enrolled in 1982. A total of 669,046 participants were analyzed, among whom 237,201 deaths occurred through 2004. We obtained estimates of O3 concentrations at the participant’s residence from a hierarchical Bayesian space–time model. Estimates of fine particulate matter (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of up to 2.5 μm [PM2.5]) and NO2 concentrations were obtained from land use regression. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to examine mortality associations adjusted for individual- and ecological-level covariates.

Measurements and Main Results: In single-pollutant models, we observed significant positive associations between O3, PM2.5, and NO2 concentrations and all-cause and cause-specific mortality. In two-pollutant models adjusted for PM2.5, significant positive associations remained between O3 and all-cause (hazard ratio [HR] per 10 ppb, 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01–1.04), circulatory (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01–1.05), and respiratory mortality (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08–1.16) that were unchanged with further adjustment for NO2. We also observed positive mortality associations with both PM2.5 (both near source and regional) and NO2 in multipollutant models.

Conclusions: Findings derived from this large-scale prospective study suggest that long-term ambient O3 contributes to risk of respiratory and circulatory mortality. Substantial health and environmental benefits may be achieved by implementing further measures aimed at controlling O3 concentrations.

Keywords: air pollution, mortality, ozone, prospective study


At a Glance Commentary

Scientific Knowledge on the Subject

Tropospheric ozone (O3) might be associated with cardiovascular disease risk and premature death. Results from long-term epidemiological studies on O3 are scarce and inconclusive.

What This Study Adds to the Field

In this study, we examined the association between chronic ambient O3 exposure and all-cause and cause-specific mortality in an extended analysis of the Cancer Prevention Study II, using new national-level estimates of ambient O3, fine particulate matter (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of up to 2.5 μm [PM2.5]), and NO2 concentrations. Results from this large-scale prospective study suggest that long-term ambient O3 contributes to risk of respiratory and circulatory mortality. There were also positive mortality associations observed with PM2.5 (both near source and regional) and NO2 in multipollutant models.

Epidemiological studies investigating short-term exposures (ranging from hours to a few days) to ambient ozone (O3) showed positive associations with mortality, exacerbation of respiratory illness, and increased hospital admissions (1). There is suggestive evidence that short-term O3 is associated with adverse cardiovascular effects (2–4). Epidemiological studies of long-term O3 exposure are scarce, and the causal nature of associations uncertain (4, 5).

A prior study based on 18 years of follow-up of 448,850 participants, including 118,777 deaths, in the American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study-II (CPS-II) showed significant positive associations between long-term (1977–2000) O3 from available urban government monitors and both respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in single-pollutant models (6). In models adjusted for fine particulate matter (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of up to 2.5 μm [PM2.5]), only the association with respiratory mortality remained (hazard ratio [HR] per 10 ppb, 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01–1.07). There was a moderately high correlation between the two pollutants (r = 0.64).

The California Teachers Study showed positive associations between year-round O3 concentrations and mortality due to respiratory causes (HR per interquartile range [11.02 ppb], 1.07; 95% CI, 0.97–1.19) and ischemic heart disease (IHD) (HR per 11.02 ppb, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.99–1.14) (7). In two-pollutant models, the association with IHD was confounded by PM2.5. No positive mortality associations were observed in a U.K. patient cohort (8).

There was a positive association between long-term (2001–2008) county-level O3 concentrations and chronic lower respiratory disease mortality in a U.S. ecological study (9). Positive associations were observed with cardiometabolic but not respiratory mortality in multipollutant models adjusted for PM2.5 and NO2 in the Canadian CanCHEC study (10). There were no data on potential individual-level behavioral confounding factors, including cigarette smoking, in either study.

The worldwide mean 3-month hourly maximum O3 concentration in 2005 was 54 ppb (11), and it is increasing in densely populated areas of South Asia and East Asia due largely to growing O3 precursor emissions (9). O3 contributes to increased radiative forcing and climate change (12, 13).

On the basis of findings from the previous CPS-II study, more than 217,000 deaths caused by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) worldwide were attributed to long-term O3 exposure in 2013 (6, 14). Further evidence for long-term O3 effects would markedly increase the attributable disease burden. Recent advancements in O3 exposure assessment integrating air quality data from government monitors with estimates from photochemical models across the United States afford a unique opportunity to further examine O3 effects in larger national-level studies.

We assessed associations between long-term ambient O3 exposure and all-cause and cause-specific mortality in an extended analysis of the CPS-II study using new national-level estimates of ambient O3, PM2.5, and NO2 concentrations. The increased number of included participants and extended follow-up period (from 1982 to 2004) resulted in nearly double the number of deaths investigated previously (6). Research designed to disentangle the independent effects of such ambient air pollutants is a key research priority (5). Some results were previously reported in the form of an abstract (15).

Methods

Study Population

CPS-II is a prospective study of nearly 1.2 million participants enrolled in all 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico by 77,000 volunteers in 1982. Participants were largely friends and family members of volunteers, at least 30 years of age, and had a family member aged 45 years or older. A four-page, self-administered enrollment questionnaire was used to capture data on demographic, lifestyle, medical, and other factors (16). Ethical approval for CPS-II was obtained from the Emory University School of Medicine Human Investigations Committee.

In 1984, 1986, and 1988, vital status was ascertained by study volunteers and confirmed by corresponding death certificates. After 1989, computerized linkage to the National Death Index was used (17). Through 2004, 743,543 (62.8%) participants were alive, 438,123 (37.0%) had died, and 2,921 (0.2%) were lost to follow-up or had follow-up terminated in September 1988 due to insufficient record linkage information. Deaths were classified by underlying cause using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th revisions (18, 19). More than 99% of known deaths were assigned a cause.

A total of 669,046 participants were analyzed (see Figure E1 in the online supplement). The majority of exclusions were due to missing or invalid residence (n = 385,422) (20) or covariate (n = 130,119) data (Table E1). The study cohort included 237,201 deaths in 12,662,562 person-years of follow-up.

Estimates of Ambient Air Pollution Concentrations

Estimated O3 concentrations were obtained from the hierarchical Bayesian space–time model (HBM) of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Environmental Public Health Tracking Network (Figure 1) (21). The HBM combines ambient measurement data from the National Air Monitoring Stations/State and Local Air Monitoring Stations with gridded estimates from the Models-3/Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) photochemical model to obtain daily 8-hour maximum O3 concentrations in 36 × 36-km grids for the entire United States for the years 2001–2006. To coincide with our cohort follow-up, we examined both mean annual and summertime (April–September) estimates for the years 2002–2004; year 2001 estimates were omitted due to differences in model input meteorological parameters. Mean O3 (2002–2004) values were assigned to the geocoded participant residence at enrollment and used as an indicator of long-term O3 exposure.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Distribution of mean annual daily 8-hour maximum tropospheric ozone concentrations based on a hierarchical Bayesian space–time modeling system, United States, 2002–2004.

We also examined O3 concentrations derived from a Bayesian space–time downscaling fusion model (henceforth termed “Downscaler O3”) (22). Daily 8-hour maximum O3 concentrations at the census tract centroid were estimated on the basis of National Air Monitoring Stations/State and Local Air Monitoring Stations and CMAQ model data in 12 × 12-km grids for the years 2001–2008. Downscaler O3 estimates consider all monitors, as opposed to the most prevalent monitor, where there are multiple monitors per site. We assigned mean monthly daily estimates to 545,302 CPS-II participants, as data were available only for the eastern United States for 2002–2004. Model performance using the predictive mean absolute error showed that Downscaler O3 outperformed ordinary kriging or CMAQ models alone, with a predictive mean absolute error of 5 based on the square root of daily O3 values (23). Correlations with holdout locations for daily predictions ranged from 0.61 to 0.86 at three sites in the eastern United States.

Estimated PM2.5 concentrations were obtained using a national-level hybrid land use regression (LUR) and Bayesian maximum entropy (BME) interpolation model (Figure E2) (24). Monthly PM2.5 monitoring data were collected from 1,464 sites from 1999 through 2008, with 10% reserved for cross-validation. The base LUR model that predicted PM2.5 concentrations included traffic within 1 km and green space within 100 m3. Residual spatiotemporal variation in PM2.5 concentrations was interpolated with a BME interpolation model. The two estimates were then combined. The cross-validation R2 was approximately 0.79. Mean PM2.5 (1999–2004) concentrations were used here. To address potential confounding of O3–mortality associations by PM2.5, estimates of PM2.5 were decomposed a priori into near-source (LUR) and regional (LURBME-LUR) components to more accurately account for differences in correlation structure with O3 (Tables E2 and E3). Results for the overall LURBME PM2.5 are presented in Table E4 and elsewhere for selected mortality endpoints (20, 25). HBM PM2.5 data were also examined (above) (26).

NO2 concentrations were based on a national LUR model using regulatory monitoring (hourly data from 423 monitors) and satellite-based measurements (approximately 4 million measurements, aggregated into annual average values at 81,743 locations [approximately 10 × 10-km grids]) at the census block group level for the year 2006 (27). Additional independent variables included population; satellite-based classification of land uses, impervious surfaces, tree coverage, and distance to roadways (model R2 = 0.78).

Statistical Analysis

We used Cox proportional hazards regression models to examine associations between mean O3 (2002–2004), PM2.5 (1999–2004), and NO2 (2006) concentrations and all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Models were stratified by 1-year age categories, sex, and race (white, African American, or other). Follow-up time in days since enrollment was used as the time axis. The survival times of those alive at the end of follow-up were censored.

Models were adjusted a priori for the following covariates assessed at enrollment as in previous work (6, 20, 25, 2830): education; marital status; body mass index (BMI) and BMI squared; cigarette smoking status; cigarettes per day and cigarettes per day squared; years smoked and years smoked squared; started smoking at younger than 18 years of age; passive smoking (hours); vegetable, fruit, fiber, and fat intake; beer, wine, and liquor consumption; occupational exposures; an occupational dirtiness index; and six sociodemographic ecological covariates at both the postal code and postal code minus county-level mean derived from the 1990 U.S. Census (median household income and percentage of African American residents, Hispanic residents, adults with postsecondary education, unemployment, and poverty) (Table E5).

We examined potential confounding by elevation, metropolitan statistical area size, annual average daily maximum air temperature, and 1980 percentage of air conditioning (and mean county-level residential radon concentrations for respiratory and lung cancer mortality only) (6, 29, 31–34). We also used a proportional hazards model with a random effect for county of residence at enrollment. An interaction term between O3 and follow-up time was used to assess the proportional hazards assumption.

Threshold models, defined by setting the O3 concentration to 0 below the threshold and the concentration minus the threshold value otherwise, were examined at 1-ppb increments across the entire exposure range. Potential modification of O3 associations by age at enrollment, sex, education, BMI, cigarette-smoking status, passive smoking, prior cardiovascular disease (high blood pressure, heart disease, stroke, or diabetes) or respiratory disease (asthma, emphysema, or chronic bronchitis) at enrollment, and temperature was assessed using multiplicative interaction terms. Two-sided P values based on the likelihood ratio statistic were calculated to assess their significance.

For analyses, we used SAS version 9.2 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and specialized software developed for the random effects survival model (30, 35). Ethical approval for our present analysis was obtained from the Ottawa Hospital Research Ethics Board.

Results

Participants were largely between the ages of 40 and 69 years, female, and had more than a high school education (Table 1). There was little variation in O3 concentrations by participant characteristics.

Table 1.

Distribution of Selected Participant Characteristics at Enrollment (1982), American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study II Cohort, United States (n = 669,046)

Characteristic n (%)* HBM O3 (ppb) LURBME PM2.5 (μg/m3) LUR NO2 (ppb)
Age, yr        
 <40 29,615 (4.4) 38.0 (3.9) 12.8 (2.9) 12.4 (5.7)
 40–49 137,618 (20.6) 38.0 (3.9) 12.5 (2.8) 11.4 (5.1)
 50–59 245,195 (36.7) 38.1 (3.9) 12.6 (2.8) 11.6 (5.0)
 60–69 178,062 (26.6) 38.3 (4.1) 12.5 (2.9) 11.6 (5.1)
 70–79 66,527 (9.9) 38.4 (4.2) 12.6 (2.9) 11.8 (5.0)
 ≥80 12,029 (1.8) 38.3 (4.2) 12.7 (2.9) 12.2 (5.2)
Race        
 White 632,919 (94.6) 38.2 (3.9) 12.5 (2.8) 11.5 (5.0)
 African American 25,508 (3.8) 38.1 (3.3) 13.7 (2.5) 13.3 (5.2)
 Other 10,619 (1.6) 38.3 (5.9) 12.9 (4.3) 15.6 (6.4)
Sex        
 Male 292,772 (43.8) 38.2 (4.0) 12.5 (2.8) 11.5 (5.1)
 Female 376,274 (56.2) 38.2 (4.0) 12.6 (2.9) 11.7 (5.1)
Education        
 Less than high school 78,391 (11.7) 38.1 (3.8) 12.8 (2.8) 11.6 (5.3)
 High school 207,710 (31.1) 38.1 (3.7) 12.6 (2.8) 11.4 (5.1)
 High school or above 382,945 (57.2) 38.2 (4.1) 12.5 (2.9) 11.7 (5.0)
BMI, kg/m2        
 <18.5 11,904 (1.8) 38.4 (4.0) 12.6 (2.9) 11.7 (5.0)
 18.5–24.9 338,528 (50.6) 38.2 (4.0) 12.5 (2.9) 11.6 (5.1)
 25–29.9 242,144 (36.2) 38.1 (3.9) 12.6 (2.8) 11.6 (5.1)
 ≥30 76,470 (11.4) 38.1 (3.8) 12.8 (2.8) 11.7 (5.2)
Marital status        
 Single 21,966 (3.3) 37.5 (3.8) 13.0 (2.8) 13.1 (5.5)
 Married 564,186 (84.3) 38.2 (4.0) 12.5 (2.8) 11.5 (5.0)
 Other 82,894 (12.4) 38.1 (4.0) 12.9 (2.9) 12.3 (5.3)
Cigarette-smoking status        
 Never 299,530 (44.8) 38.4 (4.0) 12.6 (2.9) 11.5 (5.1)
 Current 129,876 (19.4) 38.0 (3.8) 12.7 (2.8) 11.8 (5.1)
 Former 172,689 (25.8) 38.0 (4.0) 12.5 (2.9) 11.7 (5.1)
 Ever pipe and/or cigar 66,951 (10.0) 38.0 (3.8) 12.5 (2.8) 11.5 (5.0)
1990 ecological covariates, mean (SD)        
 Median household income, $10,000s 3.5 (1.3)
 African American, % 8.9 (15.8)
 Hispanic, % 5.9 (10.9)
 Postsecondary education, % 38.6 (13.3)
 Unemployment, % 5.6 (2.9)
 Poverty, % 10.5 (7.8)

Definition of abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; HBM = hierarchical Bayesian space–time model; LUR = land use regression; LURBME = land use regression Bayesian maximum entropy; O3 = tropospheric ozone; PM2.5 = particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of up to 2.5 μm.

*

Except where otherwise indicated.

Year-round O3 concentrations ranged from 26.7 to 59.3 ppb, with a mean (SD) of 38.2 (4.0) ppb (Table E2). For PM2.5 and NO2, average concentrations ranged from 1.4 to 27.9 μg/m3 (mean [SD], 12.6 [2.9] μg/m3) and 1.0 to 37.6 ppb (mean [SD], 11.6 [5.1] ppb), respectively. Correlations between year-round O3 and both near-source and regional PM2.5 were weak (Pearson’s r = −0.13 and +0.23, respectively) (Table E3).

In single-pollutant models, significant positive associations were present between year-round O3 and all-cause (HR per 10 ppb, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01–1.04), circulatory (HR per 10 ppb, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02–1.05), and respiratory (HR per 10 ppb, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.10–1.18) mortality (Table E6). Significant positive associations were observed for both regional PM2.5, ranging up to HR per 10 μg/m3 of 1.16 (95% CI, 1.10–1.23) for respiratory mortality, and near-source PM2.5, ranging up to HR per 10 μg/m3 of 1.45 (95% CI, 1.35–1.57) for circulatory mortality. There were significant positive associations between NO2 and all-cause (HR per 10 ppb, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03–1.06) and circulatory (HR per 10 ppb, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.06–1.09) mortality but not respiratory mortality.

In two-pollutant models adjusted for PM2.5, significant positive associations between O3 and all-cause (HR per 10 ppb, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01–1.04), circulatory (HR per 10 ppb, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01–1.05), and respiratory (HR per 10 ppb, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08–1.16) mortality were observed (Table E7). Results were unchanged with further adjustment for NO2 (Table 2). The strongest O3 association was noted for diabetes mortality specifically (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.07–1.26), followed by mortality due to dysrhythmias, heart failure, and cardiac arrest; COPD; and pneumonia and influenza. Significant positive mortality associations also remained for both regional and near-source PM2.5 in the multipollutant model. For NO2, the association with circulatory mortality attenuated (HR per 10 ppb, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01–1.05) and that with all-cause mortality was not apparent.

Table 2.

All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality Hazard Ratios in Relation to Each 10-Unit Increase in Air Pollutant Concentrations, 1982–2004 Follow-up in American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study II Cohort, United States (n = 669,046)

Cause of Death ICD-9 Codes; ICD-10 Codes Deaths (n) Multipollutant Model Data, Fully Adjusted HR* (95% CI)
HBM O3 Regional PM2.5 Near-Source PM2.5 LUR NO2
All-cause mortality All 237,201 1.02 (1.01–1.04) 1.04 (1.02–1.06) 1.26 (1.19–1.34) 1.01 (1.00–1.03)
Diseases of the circulatory system (plus diabetes) (48) 390–459, 250; I00–I99, E10–E14 105,039 1.03 (1.01–1.05) 1.07 (1.04–1.10) 1.41 (1.29–1.54) 1.03 (1.01–1.05)
Cardiovascular 410–440; I20–I25, I30–I51, I60–I69, I70 84,132 1.03 (1.01–1.05) 1.07 (1.04–1.10) 1.35 (1.23–1.49) 1.03 (1.01–1.06)
Ischemic heart disease 410–414; I20–I25 45,644 0.98 (0.95–1.00) 1.06 (1.02–1.11) 1.40 (1.23–1.60) 1.09 (1.06–1.12)
Dysrhythmias, heart failure, cardiac arrest 420–429; I30–I51 18,314 1.15 (1.10–1.20) 1.06 (1.00–1.13) 1.15 (0.93–1.42) 0.99 (0.95–1.04)
Cerebrovascular disease 430–438; I60–I69 17,085 1.03 (0.98–1.07) 1.13 (1.06–1.21) 1.50 (1.21–1.87) 0.92 (0.88–0.97)
Diabetes 250; E10–E14 4,890 1.16 (1.07–1.26) 1.01 (0.90–1.15) 2.02 (1.33–3.07) 1.01 (0.92–1.10)
Diseases of the respiratory system 460–519; J00–J98 20,484 1.12 (1.08–1.16) 1.11 (1.05–1.18) 1.17 (0.96–1.42) 0.99 (0.95–1.04)
Pneumonia and influenza 480–487; J10–J18 6,599 1.10 (1.03–1.18) 1.24 (1.12–1.37) 1.01 (0.71–1.42) 1.07 (0.99–1.15)
COPD and allied conditions 490–496; J19–J46 9,967 1.14 (1.08–1.21) 1.06 (0.97–1.15) 1.24 (0.94–1.64) 0.97 (0.91–1.04)
Lung cancer 162; C33–34 16,432 0.96 (0.91–1.00) 1.13 (1.06–1.21) 1.31 (1.05–1.63) 0.94 (0.90–0.99)

Definition of abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HBM = hierarchical Bayesian space–time model; HR = hazard ratio; ICD-9 = International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision; ICD-10 = International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision; LUR = land use regression; O3 = tropospheric ozone; PM2.5 = particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of up to 2.5 μm.

*

HRs are derived from multipollutant models including all air pollutants simultaneously. HRs are age, race, and sex stratified and adjusted for education; marital status; body mass index; body mass index squared; cigarette smoking status; cigarettes smoked per day and cigarettes per day squared; years smoked and years smoked squared; age started smoking younger than 18 years; passive smoking; vegetable, fruit, and fiber intake; fat intake; beer, wine, and liquor intake; industrial exposures; an occupational dirtiness index; and 1990 ecological covariates: median household income and percentage of African Americans, Hispanics, postsecondary education, unemployment, and poverty.

Results for O3 strengthened slightly for respiratory mortality with adjustment for percentage with air conditioning (Table E8). Results were slightly attenuated for both for circulatory (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00–1.05) and respiratory (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.06–1.16) mortality with inclusion of a county-level random effect.

Similar results were observed using summer O3 concentrations, except for mortality due to dysrhythmias, heart failure, and cardiac arrest; diabetes; and respiratory causes. The latter results were attenuated (Table E9). Results were similar for O3 when adjusted for HBM PM2.5 compared with decomposed LURBME PM2.5 concentrations (Table E10). Results were slightly stronger using estimated Downscaler O3 concentrations (HR per 10 ppb, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03–1.07 [all-cause mortality]; HR per 10 ppb, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03–1.09 [circulatory mortality]; HR per 10 ppb, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.07–1.21 [respiratory mortality]), due largely to the subsample of included participants (Tables E2, E3, and E11).

The proportional hazards assumption was violated (P < 0.05) for associations between O3 and all-cause, circulatory, cardiovascular, and IHD mortality, with positive associations (except null results for IHD) observed in the middle 1990–1999 and later 2000–2004 time periods only, although the magnitude of the differences was small (Table E12). There was some evidence that a threshold model improved model fit for respiratory mortality at 35 ppb (P = 0.002) compared with a linear model using year-round but not summertime O3 (HR per 10 ppb using threshold O3 indicator at 35 ppb for respiratory mortality, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.11–1.22) (Figures E3 and E4). Results were somewhat suggestive of a threshold for circulatory mortality at 35 ppb (P = 0.07).

O3 circulatory and respiratory mortality associations varied according to temperature and prior cardiovascular or respiratory disease at enrollment, respectively (Table E13). Positive respiratory associations were also stronger in those younger than 65 years of age at enrollment.

For comparability across pollutants, results according to each fifth percentile–mean increment are presented in Table 3. Results were somewhat stronger with near-source PM2.5 for both all-cause (HR per 1.6 μg/m3, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03–1.05) and circulatory (HR per 1.6 μg/m3, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04–1.07) mortality and with O3 for respiratory mortality (HR per 7.1 ppb, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.05–1.11).

Table 3.

All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality Hazard Ratios in Relation to Each Fifth Percentile–Mean Increment in Air Pollutant Concentrations, 1982–2004 Follow-up in American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study II Cohort, United States (n = 669,046)

Cause of Death ICD-9 Codes; ICD-10 Codes Deaths (n) Multipollutant Model Data, Fully Adjusted HR* (95% CI)
HBM O3 (per 7.1 ppb) Regional PM2.5 (per 4.5 μg/m3) Near-Source PM2.5 (per 1.6 μg/m3) LUR NO2 (per 6.5 ppb)
All-cause All 237,201 1.02 (1.01–1.03) 1.02 (1.01–1.03) 1.04 (1.03–1.05) 1.01 (1.00–1.02)
Diseases of the circulatory system (plus diabetes) (48) 390–459, 250; I00–I99, E10–E14 105,039 1.02 (1.01–1.03) 1.03 (1.02–1.04) 1.06 (1.04–1.07) 1.02 (1.00–1.03)
Cardiovascular 410–440; I20–I25, I30–I51, I60–I69, I70 84,132 1.02 (1.01–1.03) 1.03 (1.02–1.04) 1.05 (1.03–1.07) 1.02 (1.01–1.04)
Ischemic heart disease 410–414; I20–I25 45,644 0.98 (0.97–1.00) 1.03 (1.01–1.05) 1.06 (1.03–1.08) 1.06 (1.04–1.08)
Dysrhythmias, heart failure, cardiac arrest 420–429; I30–I51 18,314 1.10 (1.07–1.14) 1.03 (1.00–1.06) 1.02 (0.99–1.06) 1.00 (0.97–1.03)
Cerebrovascular disease 430–438; I60–I69 17,085 1.02 (0.99–1.05) 1.06 (1.02–1.09) 1.07 (1.03–1.11) 0.95 (0.92–0.98)
Diabetes 250; E10–E14 4,890 1.11 (1.05–1.18) 1.01 (0.95–1.06) 1.12 (1.05–1.20) 1.01 (0.95–1.07)
Diseases of the respiratory system 460–519; J00–J98 20,484 1.08 (1.05–1.11) 1.05 (1.02–1.08) 1.03 (0.99–1.06) 1.00 (0.97–1.02)
Pneumonia and influenza 480–487; J10–J18 6,599 1.07 (1.02–1.12) 1.10 (1.05–1.15) 1.00 (0.95–1.06) 1.04 (0.99–1.10)
COPD and allied conditions 490–496; J19–J46 9,967 1.10 (1.05–1.14) 1.03 (0.99–1.07) 1.04 (0.99–1.08) 0.98 (0.94–1.02)
Lung cancer 162; C33–34 16,432 0.97 (0.94–1.00) 1.06 (1.03–1.09) 1.04 (1.01–1.08) 0.96 (0.93–0.99)

Definition of abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HBM = hierarchical Bayesian space–time model; HR = hazard ratio; ICD-9 = International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision; ICD-10 = International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision; LUR = land use regression; O3 = tropospheric ozone; PM2.5 = particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of up to 2.5 μm.

*

HRs are derived from multipollutant models including all air pollutants simultaneously. HRs are age, race, and sex stratified and adjusted for education; marital status; body mass index; body mass index squared; cigarette smoking status; cigarettes smoked per day and cigarettes per day squared; years smoked and years smoked squared; age started smoking younger than 18 years; passive smoking; vegetable, fruit, and fiber intake; fat intake; beer, wine, and liquor intake; industrial exposures; an occupational dirtiness index; and 1990 ecological covariates: median household income and percentage of African Americans, Hispanics, postsecondary education, unemployment, and poverty.

Discussion

We observed significant positive associations between long-term O3 and all-cause, circulatory, and respiratory mortality with 2%, 3%, and 12% increases in risk per 10 ppb, respectively, in this large-scale study with 22 years of follow-up. In a smaller prior study, researchers first reported long-term O3–mortality associations, but only that for respiratory mortality remained with adjustment for PM2.5 (6). We hypothesized that with improved exposure models and increased statistical power derived from longer follow-up, robust associations between O3 and both respiratory and circulatory mortality would be observed with adjustment for other copollutants. Results supporting our hypothesis were robust after adjustment for PM2.5 and NO2.

We used new national-level O3 exposure estimates extending our earlier work based on measured regional levels of air pollutants. Although there were also differences in the time period (2002–2004 vs. 1977–2000) and season (year-round vs. summertime) of O3 metrics used in the present study versus the previous study, their correlation was moderately strong (r = 0.70) (6). Analysis linking the current HBM O3 estimate to the previous analytic cohort showed stronger respiratory mortality HRs of 1.16 (95% CI, 1.09–1.24) per 10 ppb and 1.11 (95% CI, 1.06–1.17) per each fifth percentile–mean increment in two-pollutant models adjusted for PM2.5 (6). In comparison, HRs of 1.04 (95% CI, 1.01–1.07) per 10 ppb and 1.07 (95% CI, 1.02–1.12) per each fifth percentile–mean increment were observed using measured O3 data in previous work, indicating larger associations with more refined O3 estimates (6).

Our findings support previous associations with respiratory mortality in U.S. studies (6, 7). Possible biological mechanisms include oxidative stress and inflammatory pathways as well as adverse neural, epithelial, smooth muscle, and immune system impacts (4). In contrast, no positive association was observed in a large (n = 800,000) U.K. patient cohort (8). There O3 was negatively correlated with PM2.5 (r = −0.39), and regional patterns in O3 and mortality may explain the findings observed. There was no positive association with respiratory mortality in the CanCHEC study (10).

We observed a positive association with circulatory mortality that remained after adjustment for PM2.5 and NO2. Results from some previous studies were confounded by PM2.5 (6, 7). The researchers in the prior U.K. study reported no positive association with incident myocardial infarction, stroke, arrhythmia, or heart failure (36). Analysis of California CPS-II participants revealed a positive association with IHD mortality (HR per interquartile range [24.2 ppb], 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02–1.19), which remained after adjusting for PM2.5 and NO2 (29). Although we observed no association with IHD mortality here, upon restriction to California participants there was a weak positive association (HR per 10 ppb, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.99–1.14). Regional differences in these findings may relate to participant characteristics, death rates, death certificate coding, or air pollution composition. Positive associations with cardiometabolic disease mortality were observed in multipollutant models in the CanCHEC study, with the strongest findings being for diabetes (11% increase per 9.5 ppb) and IHD (6% increase) using a 21 × 21-km grid surface (10).

Findings for respiratory mortality were stronger among those with no prior respiratory disease at enrollment, suggesting a role for O3 in the development and exacerbation of disease. In a previous Medicare-based study, researchers reported positive associations between long-term O3 and mortality in those previously hospitalized for COPD, as well as in those with diabetes, congestive heart failure, or myocardial infarction (37). Findings were also stronger in younger participants. Little age difference was observed in short-term studies (38).

Stronger associations were observed in areas with lower temperature as well as in the highest temperature category. The relationship between ambient and personal O3 exposure is complex, weaker than with particles, and varies with time spent outdoors, indoor infiltration, and season (39). Time spent outdoors and engaged in sports may modify associations for asthma formation (40). Differences in short-term O3 mortality coefficients across 18 U.S. cities were related to differences in total O3 (outdoor plus indoor) exposure (41). Mitigation of short-term O3-related mortality by air conditioning prevalence was observed at high temperatures in 97 U.S. cities (42). Though results suggest a threshold for respiratory and, to a lesser extent, circulatory mortality at 35 ppb of O3 compared with that of 56 ppb (P = 0.06) in previous work (6), it remains unclear if the results represent a biological threshold per se or other such temperature-related, behavioral, or region-related processes. There were no data on time–activity patterns here.

We observed positive mortality associations with estimated LURBME PM2.5 concentrations (30). The LURBME PM2.5 model outperformed other remote sensing, geostatistical, and HBM models in CPS-II (25). Results were somewhat stronger with regional PM2.5 for respiratory mortality and near-source PM2.5 for circulatory mortality.

Correlations between O3 and PM2.5 were weak. Though air pollutants were estimated at different time periods using different methods and geographic units of scale, possibly complicating interpretation of their correlation structure, results for O3 were robust in two-pollutant models adjusted for HBM PM2.5 and estimated for the same time period and unit of scale. Their correlation was also weak (r= 0.04) (Tables E3 and E10). Results for O3 were similar using Downscaler O3 concentrations, estimated with a finer spatial resolution (12 × 12 km) (Table E11), compared with HBM O3. The correlation between HBM and Downscaler O3 was strong (r = 0.89) (Table E3).

We adjusted findings for decomposed LURBME PM2.5 and NO2 to address potential confounding in areas with low O3 but high near-source pollution (43). Negative correlations between Downscaler O3 and both near-source PM2.5 and NO2 (r = −0.41 and −0.42, respectively) were stronger than those for HBM O3 (r = −0.13 and −0.08, respectively). Downscaler HRs for all-cause and circulatory mortality also increased to a greater extent in multipollutant models compared with those for HBM O3 (Tables E3, E6, and E11).

Positive associations between NO2 and circulatory mortality were attenuated with adjustment for PM2.5 and O3. The association with all-cause mortality was no longer apparent. Currently, there is suggestive evidence for NO2-associated cardiovascular effects but uncertainty regarding its independent role (5, 44, 45). Results in two European studies revealed small positive associations with nonaccidental mortality that remained in two-pollutant models with PM2.5 (46, 47). There were also small positive mortality associations in multipollutant models with both PM2.5 and O3 in two North American studies (10, 29). Williams and colleagues (43) noted close linkages between NO2 and O3. Correlations between NO2 and HBM O3 (r = −0.08) were weak, possibly due to different units of scale and broad regional patterns of pollutants.

Limitations of this study include a lack of updated data on residential history, leading to potential misclassification of both air pollution concentrations and sociodemographic ecologic covariates over time, as well as of individual covariate data. There were no data on residential history before enrollment. Accounting for residential mobility, however, had little impact on long-term O3 or PM2.5 mortality associations in the CanCHEC study but strengthened those for more spatially resolved NO2 (10). Though there may be some selection bias due to the exclusion of participants with missing or invalid residence data, excluded participants were similar in terms of baseline sociodemographic factors (approximately 61% between 50 and 69 years of age, approximately 57% female, approximately 47% with more than high school level of education, and approximately 21% current cigarette smokers). Though we lacked historical O3 data, there was little difference in respiratory mortality HRs in previous work when researchers examined specific exposure time windows or O3 exposures matched more closely in time (5). Recent O3 concentrations are correlated with past estimates. Correlations between 1998–2000 concentrations and those from 1988–1990 and 1978–1980 were 0.80 and 0.58, respectively (6). Little is known regarding the most relevant exposure time window. Finally, multiple comparisons were performed, and some results may be due to chance.

In summary, findings derived from this large-scale prospective study suggest that long-term ambient O3 contributes to risk of respiratory and circulatory mortality. Results were robust after adjustment for PM2.5 and NO2. There were also positive mortality associations observed between PM2.5 (both near source and regional) and NO2 in multipollutant models. Substantial health and environmental benefits may be achieved by implementing further measures aimed at controlling O3 concentrations.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge Yuanli Shi for programming assistance, Marc Serre and Seung-Jae Lee for the development of the LURBME PM2.5 surface, and Kaz Ito for providing metropolitan statistical area–level O3 data used by Jerrett and colleagues (6).

Footnotes

M.C.T. was funded by a Government of Canada Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship. D.K. is the McLaughlin Chair in Risk Science at the University of Ottawa. Health Canada, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the National Institutes of Health funded the development of the PM2.5 exposure model. The American Cancer Society funded the creation, maintenance, and follow-up of the Cancer Prevention Study II cohort.

Author Contributions: Study conception and design: M.C.T., M.J., and R.T.B.; exposure assessment: M.J., B.S.B., J.D.M., J.S., and D.L.C.; provided cohort data: S.M.G. and W.R.D.; statistical analysis: M.C.T.; drafting of the manuscript: M.C.T. All authors participated in the interpretation of data as well as the revision and approval of the manuscript.

This article has an online supplement, which is accessible from this issue’s table of contents at www.atsjournals.org

Originally Published in Press as DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201508-1633OC on December 17, 2015

Author disclosuresare available with the text of this article at www.atsjournals.org.

References

  • 1.Berman JD, Fann N, Hollingsworth JW, Pinkerton KE, Rom WN, Szema AM, Breysse PN, White RH, Curriero FC. Health benefits from large-scale ozone reduction in the United States. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120:1404–1410. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1104851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ensor KB, Raun LH, Persse D. A case-crossover analysis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and air pollution. Circulation. 2013;127:1192–1199. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.000027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mustafic H, Jabre P, Caussin C, Murad MH, Escolano S, Tafflet M, Périer MC, Marijon E, Vernerey D, Empana JP, et al. Main air pollutants and myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2012;307:713–721. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency2013 Final report: integrated science assessment of ozone and related photochemical oxidants (EPA/600/R-10/076F)Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2013 [Google Scholar]
  • 5.World Health OrganizationReview of evidence on health aspects of air pollution – REVIHAPP Project.Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2013 [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jerrett M, Burnett RT, Pope CA, III, Ito K, Thurston G, Krewski D, Shi Y, Calle E, Thun M. Long-term ozone exposure and mortality. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1085–1095. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0803894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lipsett MJ, Ostro BD, Reynolds P, Goldberg D, Hertz A, Jerrett M, Smith DF, Garcia C, Chang ET, Bernstein L. Long-term exposure to air pollution and cardiorespiratory disease in the California Teachers Study cohort. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184:828–835. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201012-2082OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Carey IM, Atkinson RW, Kent AJ, van Staa T, Cook DG, Anderson HR. Mortality associations with long-term exposure to outdoor air pollution in a national English cohort. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187:1226–1233. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201210-1758OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hao Y, Balluz L, Strosnider H, Wen XJ, Li C, Qualters JR. Ozone, fine particulate matter, and chronic lower respiratory disease mortality in the United States. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192:337–341. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201410-1852OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Crouse DL, Peters PA, Hystad P, Brook JR, van Donkelaar A, Martin RV, Villeneuve PJ, Jerrett M, Goldberg MS, Pope CA, III, et al. Ambient PM2.5, O3, and NO2 exposures and associations with mortality over 16 years of follow-up in the Canadian Census Health and Environment Cohort (CanCHEC) Environ Health Perspect. 2015;123:1180–1186. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1409276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Brauer M, Amann M, Burnett RT, Cohen A, Dentener F, Ezzati M, Henderson SB, Krzyzanowski M, Martin RV, Van Dingenen R, et al. Exposure assessment for estimation of the global burden of disease attributable to outdoor air pollution. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:652–660. doi: 10.1021/es2025752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Parrish DD, Law KS, Staehelin J, Derwent R, Cooper OR, Tanimoto H, Volz-Thomas A, Gilge S, Scheel HE, Steinbacher M, et al. Long-term changes in lower tropospheric baseline ozone concentrations at northern mid-latitudes. Atmos Chem Phys. 2012;12:11485–11504. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC.et al. editors; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.New York: Cambridge University Press;2014 [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Forouzanfar MH, Alexander L, Anderson HR, Bachman VF, Biryukov S, Brauer M, Burnett R, Casey D, Coates MM, Cohen A, et al. GBD 2013 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015;386:2287–2323. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00128-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Turner M, Jerrett M, Krewski D, Gapstur S, Diver R, Beckerman B, Pope A.Long-term ozone and mortality in a large-scale prospective study [abstract 1679]. In: Abstracts of the 2014 Conference of the International Society of Environmental Epidemiology (ISEE). Research Triangle Park, NC: Environmental Health Perspectives; 2014 [Google Scholar]
  • 16.American Cancer SocietyCancer Prevention Study II (CPS II)Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; [accessed 2015 Dec 31]. Available from: http://www.cancer.org/research/researchtopreventcancer/currentcancerpreventionstudies/cancer-prevention-study [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Calle EE, Terrell DD. Utility of the National Death Index for ascertainment of mortality among cancer prevention study II participants. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137:235–241. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.World Health OrganizationInternational Classification of Diseases: manual of the international statistical classification of diseases, injuries, and causes of deathGeneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1977 [Google Scholar]
  • 19.World Health OrganizationICD-10: International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health ProblemsGeneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1992 [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pope CA, III, Turner MC, Burnett RT, Jerrett M, Gapstur SM, Diver WR, Krewski D, Brook RD. Relationships between fine particulate air pollution, cardiometabolic disorders, and cardiovascular mortality. Circ Res. 2015;116:108–115. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.305060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyAir quality data for the CDC National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network [accessed 2011 Oct 13]. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/heasd/research/cdc.html
  • 22.U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyFused air quality surfaces using downscaling tool for predicting daily air pollution [accessed 2014 Apr 2]. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/air-research/fused-air-quality-surfaces-using-downscaling-tool-predicting-daily-air-pollution
  • 23.Berrocal VJ, Gelfand AE, Holland DM. Space-time data fusion under error in computer model output: an application to modeling air quality. Biometrics. 2012;68:837–848. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01725.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Beckerman BS, Jerrett M, Serre M, Martin RV, Lee SJ, van Donkelaar A, Ross Z, Su J, Burnett RT. A hybrid approach to estimating national scale spatiotemporal variability of PM2.5 in the contiguous United States. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47:7233–7241. doi: 10.1021/es400039u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jerrett M, Turner M, Beckerman BS, Pope A, Martin RV, Serre M, Gapstur SM, Krewski D, Diver R, Thurston G, et al. Comparing remote sensing, atmospheric chemistry, and ground-based estimates of fine particulate matter on survival [abstract 5878]. In: Abstracts of the 2013 Conference of the International Society of Environmental Epidemiology (ISEE), the International Society of Exposure Science (ISES), and the International Society of Indoor Air Quality and Climate (ISIAQ). Research Triangle Park, NC: Environmental Health Perspectives; 2013 [Google Scholar]
  • 26.McMillan NJ, Holland DM, Morara M, Feng J. Combining numerical model output and particulate data using Bayesian space-time modeling. Environmetrics. 2010;21:48–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Novotny EV, Bechle MJ, Millet DB, Marshall JD. National satellite-based land-use regression: NO2 in the United States. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45:4407–4414. doi: 10.1021/es103578x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the CensusCensus of population and housing, 1990 (United States): summary tape file 3B (ICPSR 6116) [accessed 2015 Dec 31]. Available from: http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/RCMD/studies/6116
  • 29.Jerrett M, Burnett RT, Beckerman BS, Turner MC, Krewski D, Thurston G, Martin RV, van Donkelaar A, Hughes E, Shi Y, et al. Spatial analysis of air pollution and mortality in California. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188:593–599. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201303-0609OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Krewski D, Jerrett M, Burnett RT, Ma R, Hughes E, Shi Y, Turner MC, Pope CA, III, Thurston G, Calle EE, et al. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality. Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2009;140:5–114, discussion 115–136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.U.S. Geological Survey, EROS Data Center.National elevation dataset [accessed 2015 Dec 31]. Available from: http://egsc.usgs.gov/isb//pubs/factsheets/fs14899.html
  • 32.Centers for Disease Control and PreventionNorth America Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) daily air temperatures and heat index (1979–2011) [accessed 2015 Dec 31]. Available from: http://wonder.cdc.gov/NASA-NLDAS.html
  • 33.U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the CensusCensus of population and housing, 1980 (United States): summary tape file 3B (ICPSR 8318) [accessed 2015 Dec 31]. Available from: http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/RCMD/studies/8318
  • 34.Turner MC, Krewski D, Chen Y, Pope CA, III, Gapstur S, Thun MJ. Radon and lung cancer in the American Cancer Society cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:438–448. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.SAS version 9.2Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.2008 [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Atkinson RW, Carey IM, Kent AJ, van Staa TP, Anderson HR, Cook DG. Long-term exposure to outdoor air pollution and incidence of cardiovascular diseases. Epidemiology. 2013;24:44–53. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318276ccb8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zanobetti A, Schwartz J. Ozone and survival in four cohorts with potentially predisposing diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184:836–841. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201102-0227OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bell ML, Zanobetti A, Dominici F. Who is more affected by ozone pollution? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;180:15–28. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Brown KW, Sarnat JA, Suh HH, Coull BA, Koutrakis P. Factors influencing relationships between personal and ambient concentrations of gaseous and particulate pollutants. Sci Total Environ. 2009;407:3754–3765. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.McConnell R, Berhane K, Gilliland F, London SJ, Islam T, Gauderman WJ, Avol E, Margolis HG, Peters JM. Asthma in exercising children exposed to ozone: a cohort study. Lancet. 2002;359:386–391. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07597-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chen C, Zhao B, Weschler CJ. Assessing the influence of indoor exposure to “outdoor ozone” on the relationship between ozone and short-term mortality in U.S. communities. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120:235–240. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1103970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jhun I, Fann N, Zanobetti A, Hubbell B. Effect modification of ozone-related mortality risks by temperature in 97 US cities. Environ Int. 2014;73:128–134. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Williams ML, Atkinson RW, Anderson HR, Kelly FJ. Associations between daily mortality in London and combined oxidant capacity, ozone and nitrogen dioxide. Air Qual Atmos Health. 2014;7:407–414. doi: 10.1007/s11869-014-0249-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.U.S. EPAIntegrated science assessment for oxides of nitrogen – health criteria (2016 final report). Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2016. EPA/600/R-15/068. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Faustini A, Rapp R, Forastiere F. Nitrogen dioxide and mortality: review and meta-analysis of long-term studies. Eur Respir J. 2014;44:744–753. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00114713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Fischer PH, Marra M, Ameling CB, Hoek G, Beelen R, de Hoogh K, Breugelmans O, Kruize H, Janssen NA, Houthuijs D. Air pollution and mortality in seven million adults: the Dutch Environmental Longitudinal Study (DUELS) Environ Health Perspect. 2015;123:697–704. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1408254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cesaroni G, Badaloni C, Gariazzo C, Stafoggia M, Sozzi R, Davoli M, Forastiere F. Long-term exposure to urban air pollution and mortality in a cohort of more than a million adults in Rome. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121:324–331. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1205862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Pope CA, III, Burnett RT, Thurston GD, Thun MJ, Calle EE, Krewski D, Godleski JJ. Cardiovascular mortality and long-term exposure to particulate air pollution: epidemiological evidence of general pathophysiological pathways of disease. Circulation. 2004;109:71–77. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000108927.80044.7F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine are provided here courtesy of American Thoracic Society

RESOURCES