Skip to main content
PMC home page
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2016 May 19;11(5):e0155647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155647

ROS Involves the Fungicidal Actions of Thymol against Spores of Aspergillus flavus via the Induction of Nitric Oxide

Qingshan Shen 1, Wei Zhou 1, Hongbo Li 1, Liangbin Hu 1,*, Haizhen Mo 1
Editor: Zonghua Wang2
PMCID: PMC4872997  PMID: 27196096

Abstract

Aspergillus flavus is a well-known pathogenic fungus for both crops and human beings. The acquisition of resistance to azoles by A. flavus is leading to more failures occurring in the prevention of infection by A. flavus. In this study, we found that thymol, one of the major chemical constituents of the essential oil of Monarda punctate, had efficient fungicidal activity against A. flavus and led to sporular lysis. Further studies indicated that thymol treatment induced the generation of both ROS and NO in spores, whereas NO accumulation was far later than ROS accumulation in response to thymol. By blocking ROS production with the inhibitors of NADPH oxidase, NO generation was also significantly inhibited in the presence of thymol, which indicated that ROS induced NO generation in A. flavus in response to thymol treatment. Moreover, the removal of either ROS or NO attenuated lysis and death of spores exposed to thymol. The addition of SNP (exogenous NO donor) eliminated the protective effects of the inhibitors of NADPH oxidase on thymol-induced lysis and death of spores. Taken together, it could be concluded that ROS is involved in spore death induced by thymol via the induction of NO.

Introduction

Aspergillus flavus is a well-known saprotrophic and pathogenic fungus for its colonization of cereal grains, legumes and tree nuts [1], and many strains can produce toxic compounds, especially aflatoxin, which leads to rapid death and chronic outcomes such as hepatocellular carcinoma [2]. In addition, as an opportunistic human and animal pathogen, A. flavus causes aspergillosis in immunocompromised individuals [3]. In some tropical countries (e.g. India, Sudan, Kuwait, and Iran), A. flavus is also proved predominantly responsible for fungal rhinosinusitis and fungal eye infections (endopthalmitis and keratitis) [4–6]. To eliminate the adverse effects of A. flavus, some antifungal agents (e.g. voriconazole) have been developed to treat infections caused by this fungus. However, recent reports have showed clinical failures due to the acquirement of resistance to azoles by A. flavus [7–9]. Deep perception of mechanisms underlying death of A. flavus will contribute to the development of new efficient drugs against this pathogen.

Many kinds of essential oils have been showed with antifungal activities, and are obtaining intensive concern including in the control of A. flavus [10–12]. Thymol, one of major chemical constituents of essential oil in Monarda punctate, is capable of affecting the surface electrostatics of cell membrane and membrane integrity and killing fluconazole-resistant Candida isolates [13,14]. Experiments in vitro indicated that thymol inhibits H(+)-ATPase in the cytoplasmic membrane [15], ergosterol biosynthesis [13], and drug efflux pumps [16]. Through cell-based screen, Darvishi [17] built a new mode of thymol antifungal activity through inhibiting transcription of EST2 and thus telomerase activity, accelerating telomere shortening, and then increasing the rate of cell senescence and apoptosis. Taken together, thymol as an active small molecule, probably has several targets in the fungal cell. Recent studies show although many antibiotics have different targets in bacteria, the lethal actions are common by the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [18,19]. Thymol can also trigger the eruption of ROS to kill Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [20]. Whether ROS involves the fungicidal action of thymol remains to be elucidated. In this study we determined the antifungal activity of thymol against A. flavus, and discovered the involvement of ROS in fungicidal action via inducing nitric oxide (NO).

Materials and Methods

Chemicals

Thymol (≥99.0%) was purchased from SIGMA. The probes for ROS and NO detection were obtained from Beyotime. Other chemicals were reagent grade.

Spore suspension preparation

A. flavus CGMCC3.2890 was obtained from the China General Microbial culture collection Centre and recovered on the Sabouraud Dextrose (SD) medium containing 4% (w/v) glucose, 1% (w/v) peptone and 1.5% (w/v) agar. The spore suspension was collected by shaking the strain plate slightly with the addition of 0.1% Triton X-100. And spore numbers were counted by using a blood counting chamber under the microscope (Motic, BA210).

MIC measuring

Spore suspension of A. flavus was inoculated into the SD liquid medium with final concentration of 2×106 spores per milliliter, and the spore medium was divided into the cells of 96-well plate. Thymol was then added into the wells with the final concentrations of 0, 25, 50, 80, 100, 150 and 200 μg/mL, respectively. The plate was incubated at 30°C for 48h, and the growth of A. flavus in each well was assessed and compared through observation. And the optical density in each well was detected at 600nm through a microplate reader (Thermol, Varioskan Flash). The MIC (Minimum Inhibitory Concentration) of thymol to A. flavus was defined as no visible growth in the wells [21].

Spores viability assay

Spore numbers in wells were counted by using a microscope, and spores viability was analyzed by transferring the spore suspension onto SD agar plates. The spores were washed once with the saline solution before determining their survival. The suspension of spores was serial-diluted and transferred onto SD plates, and then incubated at 30°C for 12 h. The viable spores were calculated by counting the colony numbers on the plate.

Mycelial biomass assay

Spores suspension was inoculated into 20mL SD liquid media (105 /ml) containing 0, 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 μg/mL thymol, respectively. All treatments were incubated at 30°C, 150 rpm for 48 h. The dry weight of A. flavus mycelia were weighed after filtering (Millipore filters; 0.45μm pore size) to remove the medium and drying at 80°C for 24 h.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

A. flavus spores suspension (2×106/mL) was exposed to 200 μg/mL thymol at 30°C, 150 rpm for 24 h. Then all samples were centrifuged at 8000 g for 5 min to remove the media, washed with 1mL phosphate buffer saline (PBS, pH 7.4), and then fixed with pre-cooled 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO, EUA) at 4°C overnight. The fixed spores were washed with PBS, dehydrated with ethanol (from 30% to 100%) and then centrifuged at 8000 g for 5 min to remove ethanol. The pellets were resuspended twice with isoamyl acetate in an interval of 20 min. Finally, 10 μL spores suspension in isoamyl acetate was transferred onto an 8-mm disk and was dried at room temperature. All the treated samples were coated with gold in a metallizer (Shimadzu IC-50, Kyoto, Japan) before they were observed by SEM (SEM Shimadzu SS550, Kyoto, Japan).

ROS and NO assay

ROS in spores was visualized using DCFH-DA (2’, 7’-dichlorofluorescein diacetate) fluorescent probe described by Foreman [22] and NO in spores was visualized using DAF-FM DA (3-Amino, 4-aminomethyl-2’, 7’-difluorescein, diacetate) fluorescent probe described by Guo [23] through an inverted fluorescence microscope (excitation 488 nm and emission 525 nm) (ECLIPSE, TE2000-S, Nikon). The relative fluorescent density of the fluorescent images was analyzed using Image-Pro Plus 6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Inc.) [24]. All the probes were loaded into the spores by incubation in the cultures containing the probes at 37°C for 30 min before the treatment with thymol. Treated spores were sampled to remove the reagents by washing with the saline solution. Finally, 100 μL spores suspension in saline solution was added into the wells of 96-well plate directly for fluorescent photography. Three kinds of NADPH oxidase inhibitors, imidazole (IMZ, 1.2 mM), pyridine (PY, 10 mM), and diphenylene iodonium (DPI, 10 μM) were applied to prevent the generation of ROS respectively [25,26]. Tungstate (Na2WO4, 60μM) and NG-Monomethyl -L-arginine (L-NMMA, 0.4mM) were applied to remove NO as nitrate reductase (NR) inhibitor and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor, respectively [27,28]. The 2-(4-carboxy-2-phenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylinidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide (cPTIO, 0.2 mM) was applied as NO scavenger [29]. Sodium nitroprusside (SNP, 1 mM) was applied as NO donor. The scavengers and inhibitors of ROS and NO are all dissolved in water except DPI in DMSO.

Enzymatic activity assay

About 108 spores were collected after the exposure of 200μg/ml thymol and grounded in liquid nitrogen. The obtained powder was homogenized in the ice-cooled 100mM HEPES–KOH buffer (pH 7.5) containing 5mM DTT, 1mM ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA), 10% glycerol, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.5mM phenylmethylsulfonyl (PMSF), 20μM FAD, 25μM leupeptin, 5μM Na2MoO4 and 1% polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP). The homogenate was centrifuged at 13,000 g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was used as the crude extract for the assay of enzyme activities. The activity of NOS and NR was determined with NOS assay kit (Cat No. A1042, Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) and NR assay kit (Cat No. A096,Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) according to their instructions, respectively.

Transcript analysis

Spores exposed to 200 μg/ml thymol were sampled and grounded in liquid nitrogen. The total RNA was extracted with RNApure Plant Kit (Cat No. Cw0559, Beijing CoWin Bioscience Co. Ltd., Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted RNA was treated with DNase I (Takara, Otsu, Japan) at 37°C for 30 min to remove the genomic DNA and then reverse-transcribed to form the first-strand cDNA. The reaction was followed by denaturation at 92°C for 5 min and then cooling to 5°C. The obtained cDNA was then amplified for semi-quantitative analysis. The primers of NOS (forward: 5'-CTGAGCTCCGTGATCTGGTC-3'; reverse: 5'-GAGGCGGTATCCGTACTTCG -3') and NR (forward: 5'-CCCGGTCAAATAGGAGGACG-3'; reverse: 5'-AGTACATATCGCGAGGCTGC-3') were designed by Primer-blast in NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast). The 18S rRNA gene was used as the internal standard (forward 5'-ATGGCCGTTCTTAGTTGGTG-3'; reverse: 5'-GTACAAAGGGCAGGGACGTA-3'). The PCR programs included 30 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 55°C for 20 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min. The RNA samples were tested for genomic DNA contamination with the extracted RNA directly as the PCR template prior to cDNA synthesis and under the same PCR conditions. The RT-PCR products were separated on 2% agarose gels and stained with ethidium bromide. All of the RT-PCR reactions were performed at least three times. Densitometric scanning using a computer-assisted image analysis system (IP Lab Gel; Signal Analytics Corp., Vienna, VA, USA) was used to quantify the signal intensity of each band. The relative abundance of the transcripts were obtained by dividing the band intensity of target gene by the band density of the corresponding 18S rRNA.

Statistical analysis

Each result was presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three replicated measurements. Significant differences between treatments were statistically evaluated by SD and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS 2.0. The data between two specific different treatments were compared statistically by Student’s t-test. The differences were considered significant at P<0.05.

Results

Antifungal activity of thymol against A. flavus

Thymol showed efficient antifungal activity against A. flavus. The growth of spores decreased in the wells of 96-well plate with higher concentration of thymol. Almost no visible mycelia could be observed when the well containing more than 80 μg/mL of thymol, which was in line with the data of OD600 for each well (Fig 1A). The MIC of thymol against spore growth of A. flavus was defined as 80 μg/mL. Antifungal activity against A. flavus by thymol also could be found from the mycelial biomass formation (Fig 1B). More thymol led to less mycelial formation, and almost no mycelial ball formation could be visibly observed in the presence of 80μg/mL thymol (Fig 1B). To confirm whether the fungicidal effects or the fungistatic effects was involved in antifungal activity of thymol, we counted the number of spores including all spores and the viable spores remaining in the wells containing more than 80 μg/mL thymol. Seldom spores could be observed through microscopy. Considering the initial number (2×106/ml) of spores, it could be inferred that most of the spores had lysed post the exposure to more than 80μg/mL thymol. It was also supported by the results from the SEM results, indicating that considerable amounts of spores were lysed and much cell debris was produced with the exposure to 200 μg/mL thymol for 24 h (Fig 1C). Through viability assay, it was interesting to find that there were still surviving spores remaining in the wells even containing 200 μg/mL thymol (Fig 1D). However, more than 99.9% cells were killed efficiently by thymol. The survivors did not grow further in the presence of thymol, and seemed to be dormant cells (Fig 1A). Moreover, the number of survivors decreased very slowly as the concentration of thymol ranging from 80 to 200 μg/mL (Fig 1D). This phenomenon was like microbial drug persistence which has been found extensively in which a subpopulation of microorganisms is able to survive antimicrobial treatment without acquiring resistance-conferring genetic changes [30].

Fig 1. Antifungal effects of thymol on the A. flavus spores.

Fig 1

Open in a new tab

(A) The spore growth in the wells containing 0, 25, 50, 80, 100, 150 and 200 μg/mL thymol determined by the OD600 values and visible observation. (B) Mycelial biomass formations in the presence of thymol at different concentrations. (C) The morphology of spores exposed to 0 and 200 μg/mL thymol under SEM (20.0KV, 6000×). (D) The survival of spores in the wells exposed to more than 80μg/mL thymol. Each data point or bar was indicated as the means of 3 replicates ± standard deviation. Different letter indicate a significant difference between them (P <0.05).

Thymol induced ROS eruption and NO accumulation in spores

Considering the roles of ROS leading to cell death [18,31], we managed to perform in situ detection of intracellular ROS level in spores of A. flavus by using specific fluorescent probe DCFH-DA. At the same time NO generation in vivo also be monitored by using the specific probe DAF-FM DA, because NO often has some associations with ROS involving the signal regulation [29,32]. The results showed both dose-dependent generations of ROS (Fig 2A and 2B) and NO (Fig 3A and 3B) in response to the increasing thymol concentration. The addition of inhibitors of ROS production and NO scavenger (cPTIO) can significantly decrease the fluorescent intensity (Fig 2C and 2D), which confirmed the validity of these fluorescent probes to mark the level of ROS and NO in the spores of A. flavus. Both L-NMMA (NOS inhibitor) and tungstate (NR inhibitor) [27,28] decreased the NO generation (Fig 3C and 3D), and application of their combination led to the removal of most NO, suggesting that NOS and NR contribute to most NO generation in A. flavus under thymol treatment. Following RT-PCR results confirmed that the transcriptions of NOS and NR genes were upregulated in response to the treatment of thymol (Fig 3E and 3F), and their enzymatic activities also increased significantly (P<0.05) (Fig 3G). Taken together, it could be concluded that thymol induced both NOS- and NR-dependent NO generation in spores of A. flavus.

Fig 2. Thymol induced the generation of ROS in spores of A. flavus.

Fig 2

Open in a new tab

(A, B) The image and relative intensity of DCF fluorescence were obtained when the spores were exposed to thymol (0, 50, 100, 150, and 200 μg/mL, respectively) for 30 min; (C, D) The image and relative intensity of DCF fluorescence were obtained when the spores treated with NADPH oxidase inhibitors (DPI, PY, and IMZ) were exposed to 200μg/mL thymol for 30 min. Each data point or bar was indicated as the means of 3 replicates ± standard deviation. Asterisk indicates that mean values of three replicates are significantly different from the treatment of thymol (P<0.05). Different letter indicate a significant difference between them (P <0.05).

Fig 3. Thymol induced the generation of NO via NR and NOS in spores of A. flavus.

Fig 3

Open in a new tab

(A, B) The image and relative intensity of DAF fluorescence were obtained when the spores were exposed to thymol (0, 50, 100, 150, and 200 μg/mL, respectively) for 150 min; (C, D) The image and relative intensity of DAF fluorescence were obtained when the spores were exposed to 200μg/mL thymol for 150 min after the treatment with NOS inhibitors (L-NMMA), NR inhibitor (tungstate) and NO scavenger (cPTIO), respectively; (E, F) The RT-PCR products in the agarose gel and the relative transcription levels of NR and NOS gene normalized on 18S rRNA level in the spores post the exposure of thymol for 3h; (G) The NR and NOS activities in the spores post the exposure of thymol for 3h. Each data point or bar was indicated as the means of 3 replicates ± standard deviation. Asterisk indicates that mean values of three replicates are significantly different from the treatment of thymol (P<0.05). Different letter indicate a significant difference between them (P <0.05).

ROS Induced NO generation in thymol-treated spores

Through the time-course detection, it was found that thymol induced rapid accumulation of ROS in spores (Fig 4A and 4C). Compared to the control, the fluorescence of ROS increased more than 20 times at only 40min post the addition of thymol (Fig 4C). Significant increase in the NO generation mainly occurred at 60 min post the addition of thymol (Fig 4B and 4D), which was later than that of ROS. So a question arose that whether the NO generation was associated with the ROS generation. Thymol-induced NO generation decreased remarkably by blocking the ROS production with the inhibitors of NADPH oxidase (IMZ, PY, and DPI) (Fig 5A and 5B). These results suggested that ROS induced the generation of endogenous NO in A. flavus in response to thymol treatment.

Fig 4. Time course of ROS (A, C) and NO (B, D) generation in spores exposed to thymol.

Fig 4

Open in a new tab

(A) Image of DCF fluorescence was obtained when spores were exposed to 200μg/mL thymol for 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 min; (B) Image of DAF fluorescence was obtained when spores were exposed to 200μg/mL thymol for 30, 60, 90, 120 and 150 min; (C) Relative intensity of DCF fluorescence; (D) Relative intensity of DAF fluorescence. Each data point was indicated as the means of 3 replicates ± standard deviation.

Fig 5. NO generation by blocking the ROS generation in the spores exposed to thymol.

Fig 5

Open in a new tab

(A) The image of DAF fluorescence was obtained when the spores treated with NADPH oxidase inhibitors (DPI, PY, and IMZ) were exposed to 200μg/mL thymol for 150min; (B) Relative intensity of DAF fluorescence. Each data bar was indicated as the means of 3 replicates ± standard deviation. Asterisk indicates that mean values of three replicates are significantly different from the treatment of thymol (P<0.05).

ROS Involved in the spore death by thymol via NO

To determine the roles of the interaction between ROS and NO in spore lysis induced by thymol, the blockers of ROS and NO generation were applied before thymol exposure. The spore number was counted at 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h post the addition of thymol. Based on the existing spore number, it could be found that both the removal of ROS and NO modified the spore lysis by thymol (Fig 6A and 6B). The removal of NO by the addition of NR inhibitor tungstate resulted in the least NO generation in spores (Fig 3D), which allowed the most spores existing from lysis (Fig 6B). Here it should be noted that the spores without lysis did not equal to the surviving spores. After the recovery of these spores on SD plate, most of these spores were dead cells (Fig 6C and 6D). Similar with their protective effects on the spore lysis, both the removal of ROS and NO made more spores survive thymol treatment (Fig 6C and 6D). To confirm the dependence of ROS on NO in the protective effects, we supplied the NO by the addition of exogenous NO donor SNP after blocking the ROS production with the NADPH oxidase inhibitors. The results showed that the supplement of SNP could eliminate the protective roles of ROS removal in the presence of thymol (Fig 6D), whereas KNO2 and K4Fe(CN)6 (byproducts of SNP) had not significant effects (P<0.05) (S1 Fig). This indicated that NO blocked the protective roles of ROS removal. Taken together, it could be concluded that ROS-dependent NO generation was involved in the spore death induced by thymol.

Fig 6. Removal of ROS or NO led to less sporular lysis and death in A. flavus.

Fig 6

Open in a new tab

(A)The count of remaining spores when they were exposed to 200 μg/mL thymol for 6,12 and 24h after blocking the ROS generation by the addition of NADPH oxidase inhibitors (DPI, PY, and IMZ); (B) The count of remaining spores when they were exposed to 200 μg/mL thymol for 6,12 and 24h after blocking the NO generation by the addition of NOS inhibitors (L-NMMA), NR inhibitor (tungstate) and NO scavenger (cPTIO); (C) The survival spores when they were exposed to 200 μg/ml thymol for 12 h after blocking the NO generation by the addition of NOS inhibitors (L-NMMA), NR inhibitor (tungstate) and NO scavenger (cPTIO); (D) The survival spores when they were exposed to 200 μg/mL thymol for 12 after blocking the ROS generation by the addition of NADPH oxidase inhibitors (DPI, PY, and IMZ) and then supplying exogenous SNP as the NO donor. The original spore number before the addition of all kinds of drugs is 1.92×106. Each data bar was indicated as the means of 3 replicates ± standard deviation. Asterisk indicates that mean values of three replicates are significantly different between the different treatments (P<0.05)

Discussion

Since slow discovery of new antibiotics has not been competent to resolve continual emergence of resistant strains to antibiotics [33], existing resources have to be reconsidered and re-developed to help overcome this problem. Thymol is one of the most constitutes of thyme, which has historically been applied as a traditional medical purpose against alopecia areata, bronchitis, and cough [34]. Thymol has been registered as food additives in China (FEMA number, 3066) and medical drugs for skin care, dental care and oral hygiene based on its antibacterial activity (www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/cfrsearch.cfm?fr=310.545). Our results indicated that thymol has the efficient fungicidal activity against A. flavus, which facilitates it great potential to be developed as drugs for the medical treatment of aspergillosis disease. In addition, some essential oil containing thymol has been used to control the bacterial wilt incidence in tomato [35]. So thymol was supposed to be used on crops to decrease the infection of A. flavus.

ROS has been revealed to play important roles in cell death among species from bacteria, fungi, plant, and mammals [19,36–39]. Application of some antioxidants can significantly increase the tolerance to the stress by antimicrobials [40]. Through the ROS scavengers, we confirmed the positive roles of ROS in the fungicidal activity of thymol against A. flavus. Some bacteria generate nitric oxide (NO), which can induce antibiotic tolerance by blocking the Fenton reaction and stimulating antioxidant enzyme action [41]. It is very interesting that NO accumulation also occurs post the eruption of ROS in the A. flavus. Although NO as a highly reactive molecule has been recognized as an intra-and inter-cellular signaling molecule in animals, plants and microorganisms, it is discovered that fungi are capable of synthesizing NO until the last decade [42]. NO can induce sexual development and affect the morphogenesis in A. nidulans, which is possible in part via self-inflicted ROS production [43,44]. NO has also proved to involve in the protection of mycelia of edible fungi from heat stress-induced oxidative damage [45]. However, our present data suggested that NO promotes cell death but not protect cell from stresses. Indeed, both NO and ROS are established to be responsible for antimicrobial attack against both bacterial and fungal infection in the mammalian hosts [46]. In plant, endogenous NO is also actually required for cadmium-induced cell death [47], and mediates selenium-induced phytotoxicity by promoting ROS generation in Brassica rapa [29]. Out results showed that NO generation was induced by ROS, and involved the fungicidal role of thymol instead of ROS alone. To our knowledge, few reports have mentioned endogenous NO in fungi mediated the cell death in response to the chemical stresses.

How does NO lead to cell death? Many NO-induced effects are mediated by oxidative damage associated with the formation of the potent oxidant peroxynitrite via interaction with superoxide (NO + O2- → -ONOO) [32]. But our results showed given the removal of ROS with special scavengers, NO still mediated the spore death of A. flavus exposed to thymol. Derakhshan and colleagues elucidated [48] that NO signaling in biological systems and the molecular adaptations originated from its ability to selectively target a subset of protein Cys residues by S-nitrosylation. NO signaling cascade leading to cell death has been discovered, and it is initiated by S-nitrosylation of Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (on Cys150 in the updated sequence), resulting in the specific binding and stabilization of an otherwise labile protein mediator of apoptotic cell death, the E3 ubiquitin ligase, Siah1[49]. By sequence blast and model-template alignment through Swiss-Model, we identified GAPDH in A. flavus sharing more than 70% sequence identity and high structure similarity with that of in Rattus norvegicus. Especially the sequence around Cys residues by S-nitrosylation is the exactly same, which supports GAPDH in A. flavus might be the target of NO in the presence of thymol. However we could not make sure S-nitrosylation of GAPDH involve the cell death by thymol. After all NO mediated the cell death is dependent on the presence of thymol because the addition of only exogenous NO donor cannot inhibit the spore growth of A. flavus (S2 Fig). The NO signaling cascade in cell death in A. flavus induced by thymol remains to be further elucidated, and the effectors in this cascade could be considered as the targets in the new drugs development for aspergillosis or other fungal diseases.

Supporting Information

S1 Data. Dataset for this study.

(XLS)

Click here for additional data file. (37KB, xls)
S1 Fig. The survival spores when they were exposed to 200 μg/mL thymol for 12h after blocking the ROS generation by the addition of NADPH oxidase inhibitors (DPI, PY, and IMZ).

KNO2 and K4Fe(CN)6 are the products released from SNP in aqueous solution. The symbols of “+” and “-” were indicated with or without the treatment, respectively. Each data bar was indicated as the means of 3 replicates ± standard deviation. Asterisk indicates that mean values of three replicates are significantly different between the different treatments (P<0.05)

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file. (2.9MB, tif)
S2 Fig. Effects of SNP on the spore growth of A. flavus.

Fresh spores were inoculated into the wells (spores density: 106/ml) of the 96-well plate containing 200μL SD liquid media with different concentrations of SNP, and then was incubated at 30°C for 24h. The value of OD600 was detected by the microplate reader. Each data bar was indicated as the means of 3 replicates ± standard deviation.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file. (499.8KB, tif)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University NCET-12-0694, Program for Science and Technology Innovation Team in Universities of Henan Province (16IRTSTHN007) and Key scientific and technological projects of Henan Province (NO. 152102110086)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University, NCET-12-0694, to Haizhen Mo; the Program for Science and Technology Innovation Team in Universities of Henan Province (16IRTSTHN007) to Haizhen Mo; and Key scientific and technological projects of Henan Province (NO. 152102110086) to Liangbin Hu. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Machida M, Gomi K. Aspergillus: molecular biology and genomics: Horizon Scientific Press; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kensler TW, Roebuck BD, Wogan GN, Groopman JD. Aflatoxin: a 50-year odyssey of mechanistic and translational toxicology. Toxicol Sci. 2011;120 Suppl 1: S28–48. 10.1093/toxsci/kfq283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Amaike S, Keller NP. Aspergillus flavus. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2011;49: 107–133. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-072910-095221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chakrabarti A, Shivaprakash MR, Singh R, Tarai B, George VK, Fomda BA, et al. Fungal endophthalmitis: fourteen years’ experience from a center in India. Retina. 2008;28: 1400–1407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chakrabarti A, Rudramurthy SM, Panda N, Das A, Singh A. Epidemiology of chronic fungal rhinosinusitis in rural India. Mycoses. 2015;58: 294–302. 10.1111/myc.12314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chakrabarti A, Singh R. The emerging epidemiology of mould infections in developing countries. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2011;24: 521–526. 10.1097/QCO.0b013e32834ab21e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chowdhary A, Kathuria S, Xu J, Meis JF. Emergence of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus strains due to agricultural azole use creates an increasing threat to human health. Plos Pathogens. 2013; 9: 623–626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Liu W, Sun Y, Chen W, Liu W, Wan Z, et al. The T788G mutation in the cyp51C gene confers voriconazole resistance in Aspergillus flavus causing aspergillosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56: 2598–2603. 10.1128/AAC.05477-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Paul RA, Rudramurthy SM, Meis JF, Mouton JW, Chakrabarti A. A novel Y319H mutation in CYP51C associated with azole resistance in Aspergillus flavus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59: 6615–6619. 10.1128/AAC.00637-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Paranagama P, Abeysekera K, Abeywickrama K, Nugaliyadde L. Fungicidal and anti-aflatoxigenic effects of the essential oil of Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) Stapf.(lemongrass) against Aspergillus flavus Link. isolated from stored rice. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2003;37: 86–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Omidbeygi M, Barzegar M, Hamidi Z, Naghdibadi H. Antifungal activity of thyme, summer savory and clove essential oils against Aspergillus flavus in liquid medium and tomato paste. Food control. 2007;18: 1518–1523. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tian J, Ban X, Zeng H, He J, Chen Y, Wang Y, et al. The mechanism of antifungal action of essential oil from dill (Anethum graveolens L.) on Aspergillus flavus. PLoS ONE. 2012;7: e30147 10.1371/journal.pone.0030147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ahmad A, Khan A, Akhtar F, Yousuf S, Xess I, Khan LA, et al. Fungicidal activity of thymol and carvacrol by disrupting ergosterol biosynthesis and membrane integrity against Candida. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;30: 41–50. 10.1007/s10096-010-1050-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sánchez ME, del V Turina A, Garcıa DA, Nolan MV, Perillo MA. Surface activity of thymol: implications for an eventual pharmacological activity. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2004;34: 77–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ahmad A, Khan A, Yousuf S, Khan LA, Manzoor N. Proton translocating ATPase mediated fungicidal activity of eugenol and thymol. Fitoterapia. 2010;81: 1157–1162. 10.1016/j.fitote.2010.07.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ahmad A, Khan A, Manzoor N. Reversal of efflux mediated antifungal resistance underlies synergistic activity of two monoterpenes with fluconazole. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2013;48: 80–86. 10.1016/j.ejps.2012.09.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Darvishi E, Omidi M, Bushehri AA, Golshani A, Smith ML. Thymol antifungal mode of action involves telomerase inhibition. Medical mycology. 2013;51: 826–834. 10.3109/13693786.2013.795664 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kohanski MA, Dwyer DJ, Hayete B, Lawrence CA, Collins JJ. A common mechanism of cellular death induced by bactericidal antibiotics. Cell. 2007;130: 797–810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dwyer DJ, Kohanski MA, Collins JJ. Role of reactive oxygen species in antibiotic action and resistance. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2009;12: 482–489. 10.1016/j.mib.2009.06.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li H, Yang T, Li FY, Yao Y, Sun ZM. Antibacterial activity and mechanism of action of Monarda punctata essential oil and its main components against common bacterial pathogens in respiratory tract. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7: 7389 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.O'Shaughnessy EM, Meletiadis J, Stergiopoulou T, Demchok JP, Walsh TJ. Antifungal interactions within the triple combination of amphotericin B, caspofungin and voriconazole against Aspergillus species. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;58: 1168–1176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Foreman J, Demidchik V, Bothwell JH, Mylona P, Miedema H, Torres MA, et al. Reactive oxygen species produced by NADPH oxidase regulate plant cell growth. Nature. 2003;422: 442–446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Guo K, Xia K, Yang ZM. Regulation of tomato lateral root development by carbon monoxide and involvement in auxin and nitric oxide. J Exp Bot. 2008;59: 3443–3452. 10.1093/jxb/ern194 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chen Y, Mo HZ, Zheng MY, Xian M, Qi ZQ, Li YQ, et al. Selenium inhibits root elongation by repressing the generation of endogenous hydrogen sulfide in Brassica rapa. PLoS ONE. 2014;9: e110904 10.1371/journal.pone.0110904 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Auh CK, Murphy TM. Plasma membrane redox enzyme is involved in the synthesis of O2-and H2O2 by Phytophthora elicitor-stimulated rose cells. Plant Physiology. 1995;107: 1241–1247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Iizuka T, Kanegasaki S, Makino R, Tanaka T, Ishimura Y. Pyridine and imidazole reversibly inhibit the respiratory burst in porcine and human neutrophils: evidence for the involvement of cytochrome b558 in the reaction. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1985;130: 621–626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chen J, Zhang HQ, Hu LB, Shi ZQ. Microcystin-LR-induced phytotoxicity in rice crown root is associated with the cross-talk between auxin and nitric oxide. Chemosphere. 2013;93: 283–293. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.04.079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sun C, Lu L, Liu L, Liu W, Yu Y, Liu X, et al. Nitrate reductase-mediated early nitric oxide burst alleviates oxidative damage induced by aluminum through enhancement of antioxidant defenses in roots of wheat (Triticum aestivum). New Phytol. 2014;201: 1240–1250. 10.1111/nph.12597 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chen Y, Mo HZ, Hu LB, Li YQ, Chen J, Yang LF. The Endogenous Nitric Oxide Mediates Selenium-Induced Phytotoxicity by Promoting ROS Generation in Brassica rapa. PloS ONE. 2014;9:e110901–e110901. 10.1371/journal.pone.0110901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cohen NR, Lobritz MA, Collins JJ. Microbial persistence and the road to drug resistance. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;13: 632–642. 10.1016/j.chom.2013.05.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jha BK, Jung HJ, Seo I, Suh SI, Suh MH, Baek WK. Juglone induces cell death of Acanthamoeba through increased production of reactive oxygen species. Exp Parasitol. 2015;159: 100–106. 10.1016/j.exppara.2015.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mur LA, Carver TL, Prats E. NO way to live; the various roles of nitric oxide in plant–pathogen interactions. J Exp Bot. 2006;57: 489–505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lewis K. Platforms for antibiotic discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013;12: 371–387. 10.1038/nrd3975 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Basch E, Ulbricht C, Hammerness P, Bevins A, Sollars D. Thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.), thymol. J Herb Pharmacother. 2004;4: 49–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pradhanang P, Momol M, Olson S, Jones J. Effects of plant essential oils on Ralstonia solanacearum population density and bacterial wilt incidence in tomato. Plant disease. 2003;87: 423–427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chiappini F, Pontillo C, Randi A, Alvarez L, de Pisarev DLK. Reactive oxygen species and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 mediate hexachlorobenzene-induced cell death in FRTL-5 rat thyroid cells. Toxicol Sci. 2013;134: 276–290. 10.1093/toxsci/kft117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cotoras M, Castro P, Vivanco H, Melo R, Mendoza L. Farnesol induces apoptosis-like phenotype in the phytopathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea. Mycologia. 2013;105: 28–33. 10.3852/12-012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.You J, Chan Z. ROS regulation during abiotic stress responses in crop plants. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6: 1092 10.3389/fpls.2015.01092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Li ZY, Yang Y, Ming M, Liu B. Mitochondrial ROS generation for regulation of autophagic pathways in cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;414: 5–8. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.09.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Belenky P, Collins JJ. Antioxidant strategies to tolerate antibiotics. Science. 2011;334: 915–916. 10.1126/science.1214823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gusarov I, Shatalin K, Starodubtseva M, Nudler E. Endogenous nitric oxide protects bacteria against a wide spectrum of antibiotics. Science. 2009;325: 1380–1384. 10.1126/science.1175439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Vieira AL, Linares E, Augusto O, Gomes SL. Evidence of a Ca 2+-NO-cGMP signaling pathway controlling zoospore biogenesis in the aquatic fungus Blastocladiella emersonii. Fungal Genet Biol. 2009;46: 575–584. 10.1016/j.fgb.2009.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Baidya S, Cary JW, Grayburn WS, Calvo AM. Role of nitric oxide and flavohemoglobin homolog genes in Aspergillus nidulans sexual development and mycotoxin production. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77: 5524–5528. 10.1128/AEM.00638-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rodrigues AP, Carvalho AS, Santos AS, Alves CN, do Nascimento JL, Silva EO. Kojic acid, a secondary metabolite from Aspergillus sp., acts as an inducer of macrophage activation. Cell Biol Int. 2011;35: 335–343. 10.1042/CBI20100083 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kong W, Huang C, Chen Q, Zou Y, Zhang J. Nitric oxide alleviates heat stress-induced oxidative damage in Pleurotus eryngii var. tuoliensis. Fungal Genet Biol. 2012;49: 15–20. 10.1016/j.fgb.2011.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Missall TA, Pusateri ME, Donlin MJ, Chambers KT, Corbett JA, Lodge JK. Posttranslational, translational, and transcriptional responses to nitric oxide stress in Cryptococcus neoformans: implications for virulence. Eukaryotic cell. 2006;5: 518–529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.De Michele R, Vurro E, Rigo C, Costa A, Elviri L, Di Valentin M, et al. Nitric oxide is involved in cadmium-induced programmed cell death in Arabidopsis suspension cultures. Plant Physiology. 2009;150: 217–228. 10.1104/pp.108.133397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Derakhshan B, Hao G, Gross SS. Balancing reactivity against selectivity: the evolution of protein S-nitrosylation as an effector of cell signaling by nitric oxide. Cardiovasc Res. 2007;75: 210–219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hara MR, Agrawal N, Kim SF, Cascio MB, Fujimuro M, Ozeki Y, et al. S-nitrosylated GAPDH initiates apoptotic cell death by nuclear translocation following Siah1 binding. Nat Cell Biol. 2005;7: 665–674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Data. Dataset for this study.

(XLS)

Click here for additional data file. (37KB, xls)
S1 Fig. The survival spores when they were exposed to 200 μg/mL thymol for 12h after blocking the ROS generation by the addition of NADPH oxidase inhibitors (DPI, PY, and IMZ).

KNO2 and K4Fe(CN)6 are the products released from SNP in aqueous solution. The symbols of “+” and “-” were indicated with or without the treatment, respectively. Each data bar was indicated as the means of 3 replicates ± standard deviation. Asterisk indicates that mean values of three replicates are significantly different between the different treatments (P<0.05)

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file. (2.9MB, tif)
S2 Fig. Effects of SNP on the spore growth of A. flavus.

Fresh spores were inoculated into the wells (spores density: 106/ml) of the 96-well plate containing 200μL SD liquid media with different concentrations of SNP, and then was incubated at 30°C for 24h. The value of OD600 was detected by the microplate reader. Each data bar was indicated as the means of 3 replicates ± standard deviation.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file. (499.8KB, tif)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES