Skip to main content
PMC home page
Protein & Cell logoLink to Protein & Cell
. 2012 Apr 19;3(6):401–404. doi: 10.1007/s13238-012-2925-5

Fine-tune of intrinsic ERK activity by extrinsic BMP signaling in mouse embryonic stem cells

Zhongwei Li 1, Ye-Guang Chen 1,✉
PMCID: PMC4875488  PMID: 22528752

Abstract

Embryonic stem (ES) cells hold great promise in regenerative medicine and it is an urgent task to understand the underlying molecular mechanisms that control ES cell fate choice between self-renewal and differentiation. In mouse ES cells, extrinsic leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling pathways play pivotal roles in maintaining the self-renewal status under serum and feeder free culture conditions. Intrinsic extracellular-signal regulated kinase (ERK) activity is also important in determining mouse ES cell fate—low ERK activity keeps mouse ES cell self-renewal while high ERK activity drives differentiation. We recently found that while LIF signaling augments ERK activity, BMP signaling inhibits ERK activity in mouse ES cells via direct upregulation of an ERK phosphatase—dual-specificity phosphatase 9. The cooperative effects of LIF and BMP signaling keep appropriate ERK activity and maintain mouse ES cell self-renewal (Li et al., 2012). These findings shed light on how extrinsic signals converge to intrinsic signaling molecules to regulate cell fate determination. This perspective summarizes our recent new findings and discusses the current unsolved questions and future directions.

References

  1. Boyer L.A., Lee T.I., Cole M.F., Johnstone S.E., Levine S.S., Zucker J.P., Guenther M.G., Kumar R.M., Murray H.L., Jenner R.G., et al. Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells. Cell. 2005;122:947–956. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burdon T., Stracey C., Chambers I., Nichols J., Smith A. Suppression of SHP-2 and ERK signalling promotes self-renewal of mouse embryonic stem cells. Dev Biol. 1999;210:30–43. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1999.9265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chang H., Huylebroeck D., Verschueren K., Guo Q., Matzuk M.M., Zwijsen A. Smad5 knockout mice die at mid-gestation due to multiple embryonic and extraembryonic defects. Development. 1999;126:1631–1642. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.8.1631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Christie G.R., Williams D.J., Macisaac F., Dickinson R.J., Rosewell I., Keyse S.M. The dual-specificity protein phosphatase DUSP9/MKP-4 is essential for placental function but is not required for normal embryonic development. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:8323–8333. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.18.8323-8333.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fei T., Xia K., Li Z., Zhou B., Zhu S., Chen H., Zhang J., Chen Z., Xiao H., Han J.D., et al. Genome-wide mapping of SMAD target genes reveals the role of BMP signaling in embryonic stem cell fate determination. Genome Res. 2010;20:36–44. doi: 10.1101/gr.092114.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Feng X.H., Derynck R. Specificity and versatility in tgf-beta signaling through Smads. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2005;21:659–693. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.022404.142018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fong Y.W., Inouye C., Yamaguchi T., Cattoglio C., Grubisic I., Tjian R. A DNA repair complex functions as an Oct4/Sox2 coactivator in embryonic stem cells. Cell. 2011;147:120–131. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kolch W. Coordinating ERK/MAPK signalling through scaffolds and inhibitors. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:827–837. doi: 10.1038/nrm1743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kunath T., Saba-El-Leil M.K., Almousailleakh M., Wray J., Meloche S., Smith A. FGF stimulation of the Erk1/2 signalling cascade triggers transition of pluripotent embryonic stem cells from self-renewal to lineage commitment. Development. 2007;134:2895–2902. doi: 10.1242/dev.02880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Li Z., Fei T., Zhang J., Zhu G., Wang L., Lu D., Chi X., Teng Y., Hou N., Yang X., et al. BMP4 Signaling Acts via dual-specificity phosphatase 9 to control ERK activity in mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;10:171–182. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2011.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Massagué J., Chen Y.G. Controlling TGF-beta signaling. Genes Dev. 2000;14:627–644. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Orkin S.H., Hochedlinger K. Chromatin connections to pluripotency and cellular reprogramming. Cell. 2011;145:835–850. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.05.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Owens D.M., Keyse S.M. Differential regulation of MAP kinase signalling by dual-specificity protein phosphatases. Oncogene. 2007;26:3203–3213. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Passier R., van Laake L.W., Mummery C.L. Stem-cell-based therapy and lessons from the heart. Nature. 2008;453:322–329. doi: 10.1038/nature07040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pera M.F., Tam P.P. Extrinsic regulation of pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2010;465:713–720. doi: 10.1038/nature09228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Qi X., Li T.G., Hao J., Hu J., Wang J., Simmons H., Miura S., Mishina Y., Zhao G.Q. BMP4 supports self-renewal of embryonic stem cells by inhibiting mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:6027–6032. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401367101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sirard C., de la Pompa J.L., Elia A., Itie A., Mirtsos C., Cheung A., Hahn S., Wakeham A., Schwartz L., Kern S.E., et al. The tumor suppressor gene Smad4/Dpc4 is required for gastrulation and later for anterior development of the mouse embryo. Genes Dev. 1998;12:107–119. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.1.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Smith A.G. Embryo-derived stem cells: of mice and men. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2001;17:435–462. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.17.1.435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Yang X., Li C., Xu X., Deng C. The tumor suppressor SMAD4/DPC4 is essential for epiblast proliferation and mesoderm induction in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:3667–3672. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.7.3667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ying Q.L., Nichols J., Chambers I., Smith A. BMP induction of Id proteins suppresses differentiation and sustains embryonic stem cell self-renewal in collaboration with STAT3. Cell. 2003;115:281–292. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00847-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ying Q.L., Stavridis M., Griffiths D., Li M., Smith A. Conversion of embryonic stem cells into neuroectodermal precursors in adherent monoculture. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21:183–186. doi: 10.1038/nbt780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ying Q.L., Wray J., Nichols J., Batlle-Morera L., Doble B., Woodgett J., Cohen P., Smith A. The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature. 2008;453:519–523. doi: 10.1038/nature06968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Yoshida-Koide U., Matsuda T., Saikawa K., Nakanuma Y., Yokota T., Asashima M., Koide H. Involvement of Ras in extraembryonic endoderm differentiation of embryonic stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;313:475–481. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.11.138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Young R.A. Control of the embryonic stem cell state. Cell. 2011;144:940–954. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.01.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhang K., Li L., Huang C., Shen C., Tan F., Xia C., Liu P., Rossant J., Jing N. Distinct functions of BMP4 during different stages of mouse ES cell neural commitment. Development. 2010;137:2095–2105. doi: 10.1242/dev.049494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein & Cell are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES