Skip to main content
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle logoLink to Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
letter
. 2016 May 22;7(2):235–236. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12123

Growth differentiation factor‐15 as a prognostic biomarker in cancer patients

Junichi Ishida 1,, Masaaki Konishi 1, Masakazu Saitoh 1, Jochen Springer 1
PMCID: PMC4876072  PMID: 27493877

Growth differentiation factor‐15 (GDF15) is a member of the transforming growth factor beta superfamily and has been demonstrated to play multiple roles in various pathological conditions such as cancer, inflammatory diseases, cardiovascular diseases, and metabolic disorders.1 Furthermore, recent studies have shown that plasma levels of GDF15 increased in patients with chronic diseases described previously1 and that elevated GDF15 was associated with poor prognosis in patients with malignancy such as prostate cancer and upper gastrointestinal cancer.2, 3 In this study, Lerner et al. reported that elevated plasma GDF15 levels are associated with increased cancer‐related weight loss and decreased survival in cancer male patients.4

Cancer‐related weight loss has been shown to be an independent predictor for survival in cancer patients,5 which suggests that treatment for cancer cachexia might lead to the better outcome in cancer patients with weight loss. Recent studies have found several diagnostic biomarkers for loss of muscle mass such as N‐terminal peptide of procollagen type III, C‐terminal agrin fragment, leptin, ghrelin, and obestatin6, 7 and prognostic biomarkers in cancer patients such as matrix metalloproteinases, survivin, and butyrylcholinesterase.8, 9, 10 Although GDF15 might also be a useful prognostic marker in cancer patients, the small sample size, the heterogeneous population, and the selection bias could have some impacts on the findings in this study. To clarify the pathophysiological significance of GDF15 in cancer patients, validation studies on larger sample size including various cancer types and different pathological stages are needed. In addition, further research should demonstrate which biomarker including GDF15 and other novel biomarkers shows better diagnostic or prognostic performance or whether a multi‐marker approach is superior to each biomarker. Finally, it is of great research interest and clinical value whether these biomarkers could be the cancer therapeutic targets in this population.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge support by the German Research Foundation and the Open Access Publication Funds of the Göttingen University.

We certify that we comply with the ethical guidelines for publishing in the Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle: update 2015.11

Ishida, J. , Konishi, M. , Saitoh, M. , and Springer, J. (2016) Growth differentiation factor‐15 as a prognostic biomarker in cancer patients. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 7: 235–236. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12123.

References

  • 1. Unsicker K, Spittau B, Krieglstein K. The multiple facets of the TGF‐β family cytokine growth/differentiation factor‐15/macrophage inhibitory cytokine‐1. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2013;24:373–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Brown DA, Lindmark F, Stattin P, Bälter K, Adami H‐O, Zheng SL, et al Macrophage inhibitory cytokine 1: a new prognostic marker in prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:6658–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Skipworth R, Deans D, Tan B, Sangster K, Paterson‐Brown S, Brown D, et al Plasma MIC‐1 correlates with systemic inflammation but is not an independent determinant of nutritional status or survival in oesophago‐gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 2010;102:665–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Lerner L, Hayes TG, Tao N, Krieger B, Feng B, Wu Z, et al Plasma growth differentiation factor 15 is associated with weight loss and mortality in cancer patients. J Cachex Sarcopenia Muscle 2015;6:317–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Vaughan VC, Martin P, Lewandowski PA. Cancer cachexia: impact, mechanisms and emerging treatments. J Cachex Sarcopenia Muscle 2013;4:95–109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Fragala MS, Jajtner AR, Beyer KS, Townsend JR, Emerson NS, Scanlon TC, et al Biomarkers of muscle quality: N‐terminal propeptide of type III procollagen and C‐terminal agrin fragment responses to resistance exercise training in older adults. J Cachex Sarcopenia Muscle 2014;5:139–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Drescher C, Konishi M, Ebner N, Springer J. Loss of muscle mass: current developments in cachexia and sarcopenia focused on biomarkers and treatment. J Cachex Sarcopenia Muscle 2015;6:303–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Santarpia L, Grandone I, Contaldo F, Pasanisi F. Butyrylcholinesterase as a prognostic marker: a review of the literature. J Cachex Sarcopenia Muscle 2013;4:31–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Vihinen P, Kähäri VM. Matrix metalloproteinases in cancer: prognostic markers and therapeutic targets. Int J Cancer 2002;99:157–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Altieri DC. Validating survivin as a cancer therapeutic target. Nat Rev Cancer 2003;3:46–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. von Haehling S, Morley JE, Coats AJS, Anker SD. Ethical guidelines for publishing in the Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle: update 2015. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2015;6: 315-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES