Skip to main content
NCBI home page
OncoTargets and Therapy logoLink to OncoTargets and Therapy
. 2016 May 17;9:2927–2934. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S106264

The association of the CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism with head and neck cancer risk: evidence based on a cumulative meta-analysis

Yadong Wang 1,2,*,✉, Haiyan Yang 3,*, Guangcai Duan 2, Haiyu Wang 1
PMCID: PMC4876098  PMID: 27274286

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to address the association between the Ile462Val polymorphism in the gene encoding cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) and the risk of head and neck cancer (HNC).

Materials and methods

The Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched. The strength of the association was evaluated by calculating the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

Overall, we observed an increased risk of HNC in patients with the Ile/Val+Val/Val genotype compared to those with the Ile/Ile genotype among the 6,367 cases and 6,395 controls evaluated in the 34 eligible studies, with a pooled OR of 1.284 (95% CI: 1.119–1.473). In addition, we observed an increased risk of HNC in patients with the Ile/Val+Val/Val genotype compared to those with the Ile/Ile genotype in the subgroup analyses (OR =1.362, 95% CI: 1.102–1.685 for laryngeal cancer; OR =1.519, 95% CI: 1.253–1.843 for pharyngeal cancer; OR =1.371, 95% CI: 1.111–1.693 for Asians; and OR =1.329, 95% CI: 1.138–1.551 for patients in studies using hospital-based controls).

Conclusion

This cumulative meta-analysis suggests that the CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism might contribute to the risk of HNC, particularly for pharyngeal cancer and laryngeal cancer.

Keywords: CYP1A1, polymorphism, head and neck cancer, oral cancer, laryngeal cancer, pharyngeal cancer, risk

Introduction

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is a broad term that encompasses epithelial malignancies that arise in the paranasal sinuses, nasal cavity, oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx. HNC is the sixth most common type of cancer, representing ~6% of all cancer cases and accounting for an estimated 650,000 new cases and 350,000 cancer deaths worldwide each year.1 Tobacco smoking and alcohol intake are considered the major risk factors for HNC;2 however, only a small proportion of smokers and alcohol users develop HNC in their lifetime, suggesting that individual susceptibility might also be a significant factor in disease etiology. The Cancer Genome Atlas profiled 279 head and neck squamous cell carcinomas and provides a comprehensive landscape of the somatic genomic aberrations associated with HNC.3

The gene encoding cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) maps to chromosome 15 and encodes an aryl hydrocarbon hydrolase that plays a role in the metabolism of the carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons that are present in tobacco smoke. Previous studies have demonstrated that an amino acid substitution from isoleucine to valine in codon 462 (rs1048943, A4889G) in exon 7 of CYP1A1 enhances the catalytic activity of the cytochrome P450 1A1 protein4,5 and influences the risk of several cancers.6–10 To date, a number of epidemiological studies that have explored the association between the CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism and the risk of HNC have been reported.11–44 However, the results of these studies have been conflicting rather than conclusive. Thus, we conducted a cumulative meta-analysis of eligible published studies to further evaluate the association between the Ile462Val polymorphism and HNC risk.

Materials and methods

Literature source and analytical methods

We searched the Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for articles published until December 31, 2015, using various combinations of the following keywords in the search parameters: HNC, oral cancer, oral cavity cancer, pharyngeal cancer, laryngeal cancer, CYP1A1, cytochrome P450 1A1, rs1048943, polymorphism, and variant. In addition, we manually searched the reference list of relevant publications to identify additional studies.

The selection criteria of the eligible publications included the following: 1) the study that evaluated the CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism and the risk of HNC; 2) the publication that reported a case–control study or cohort study; 3) the publication that reported all data regarding the genotype of the CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism that was required to calculate the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI); and 4) the study that used controls verified to have no clinical evidence of a malignancy. Accordingly, reviews and publications of overlapping studies were excluded. In the context of publications with overlapping data, those that included more data were preferentially used in the study. In total, 45 published studies evaluating the association between the CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism and the risk of HNC were identified. We reviewed all the articles in accordance with the criteria defined earlier and excluded nine reviews and two publications with overlapping data. Ultimately, 34 studies were deemed to be eligible for the present study. One additional article45 was included in the oral cancer subgroup analysis only.

Data extraction

Data were extracted, analyzed by two investigators, and entered into an electronic database. The following information was collected from each study: author, year of publication, country, ethnicity, the source of control (hospital-based controls, which mean controls from hospital, and population-based controls, which mean controls from randomly selected healthy individuals), study population size, genotype frequency, and tumor type. The key characteristics of the eligible studies are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Characteristics of the selected studies

First author Year Country Ethnicity Source of controls Tumor type Cases Controls
Park et al11 1997 USA Mixed HB Oral and laryngeal cancers 131 131
Matthias et al12 1998 Germany Caucasian HB Oral, laryngeal, and pharyngeal cancers 380 193
Oude Ophuis et al13 1998 the Netherlands Mixed HB Oral, laryngeal, and pharyngeal cancers 185 207
Katoh et al14 1999 Japan Asian HB Oral cancer 92 147
Morita et al15 1999 Japan Asian HB Oral, laryngeal, and pharyngeal cancers 145 164
McWilliams et al16 2000 USA Caucasian PB Oral, laryngeal, and pharyngeal cancers 139 121
Olshan et al17 2000 USA Mixed HB Oral, laryngeal, and pharyngeal cancers 171 189
Sato et al18 2000 Japan Asian PB Oral cancer 142 142
Ko et al19 2001 Germany Caucasian HB Oral, laryngeal, and pharyngeal cancers 312 300
Sreelekha et al20 2001 India Asian HB Oral cancer 98 60
Hahn et al21 2002 Germany Caucasian HB Oral cancer 94 92
Kao et al22 2002 People’s Republic of China Asian HB Oral cancer 106 146
Gronau et al23 2003 Germany Caucasian HB Oral, laryngeal, and pharyngeal cancers 187 139
Gronau et al45,a 2003 Germany Caucasian HB Oral cancer 73 136
Varzim et al24 2003 Portugal Caucasian HB Laryngeal cancer 88 177
Evans et al25 2004 USA Caucasian PB Oral, laryngeal, and pharyngeal cancers 281 208
Li et al26 2004 People’s Republic of China Asian HB Laryngeal cancer 89 164
Xie et al27 2004 USA Mixed PB Oral cancer 132 143
Gajecka et al28 2005 Poland Caucasian HB Laryngeal cancer 289 316
Leichsenring et al29 2006 Brazil Mixed PB Oral cancer 72 60
Marques et al30 2006 Brazil Mixed HB Oral cancer 231 212
Sugimura et al31 2006 Japan Asian HB Oral cancer 122 241
Reszka et al32 2008 Poland Caucasian HB Oral, laryngeal, and pharyngeal cancers 127 145
Sam et al33 2008 India Asian HB Oral, laryngeal, and pharyngeal cancers 408 220
Varela-Lema et al34 2008 Spain Caucasian HB Oral and pharyngeal cancers 66 92
Amtha et al35 2009 Indonesia Asian HB Oral cancer 81 162
Singh et al36 2009 India Asian HB Oral, laryngeal, and pharyngeal cancers 200 200
Sabitha et al37 2010 India Asian HB Oral, laryngeal, and pharyngeal cancers 205 245
Sharma et al38 2010 India Asian HB Oral, laryngeal, and pharyngeal cancers 203 201
Tai et al39 2010 People’s Republic of China Asian HB Laryngeal and pharyngeal cancers 278 278
Lourenco et al40 2011 Brazil Mixed HB Oral, laryngeal, and pharyngeal cancers 142 142
Balaji et al41 2012 India Asian HB Oral cancer 157 132
Szanyi et al42 2012 Hungary Caucasian HB Laryngeal and pharyngeal cancers 142 150
Singh et al43 2014 India Asian HB Oral cancer 122 127
Maurya et al44 2015 India Asian Unknown Oral, laryngeal, and pharyngeal cancers 750 749
Open in a new tab

Note:

a

Included in the oral cancer subgroup analysis only.

Abbreviations: HB, hospital-based control study; PB, population-based control study.

Quantitative data synthesis

A cumulative meta-analysis was performed to assess the association between the CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism and the risk of HNC.46 The Cochrane Q statistics test was used to examine heterogeneity.47 The data were combined using either a fixed-effects model or a random-effects model depending on the results of the heterogeneity test. The fixed-effects model was applied if no heterogeneity was detected. In all other cases, the random-effects model was applied.47 A funnel plot was created to assess publication bias. Begg’s test (a linear regression approach used to measure funnel plot asymmetry on the natural logarithm scale of the OR)48 was used to evaluate the symmetry of the funnel plot. A sensitivity analysis was conducted in which we sequentially removed each eligible study from the pooled data.46 The pooled OR of all the studies evaluated in this meta-analysis was calculated to evaluate the significance of the Ile/Val+Val/Val vs the Ile/Ile genotype in HNC.

All the statistical analyses were conducted using the STATA 10.0 software package (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA). All the tests were two-sided, and a P-value of ≤0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Meta-analysis databases

Table 1 lists some general information associated with the eligible studies, including the first author, year of publication, country, ethnicity of the patients, source of controls, tumor subtype, and study population size. We identified a total of 34 studies that included 6,367 cases and 6,395 controls that evaluated the association between the CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism and the risk of HNC.

Test of heterogeneity

No heterogeneity was observed for the CYP1A1 Ile/Val+Val/Val genotype vs the Ile/Ile genotype in the subgroup analyses of patients with pharyngeal cancer and Caucasian patients. Therefore, we calculated the pooled ORs for these two groups using the fixed-effects model. The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled OR for the remaining subgroup analyses.

Quantitative data synthesis

Table 2 lists the pooled ORs associated with the CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism and the risk of HNC calculated for the 6,367 cases and 6,395 controls evaluated. Overall, we observed an increased risk of HNC in patients with the Ile/Val+Val/Val genotype compared to those with the Ile/Ile genotype, with a pooled OR of 1.284 (95% CI: 1.119–1.473; Figure 1).

Table 2.

Pooled OR of the association between the CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism and the risk of head and neck cancer

Group Number of studies Heterogeneity test
Analysis model Cumulative OR (95% CI) Hypothesis test
Begg’s test
Q P Z P Z P
Overall 34 104.34 0.000 Random-effects model 1.284 (1.119–1.473) 3.561 0.000 0.36 0.722
Tumor subtype
 Oral cancer 21 74.59 0.000 Random-effects model 1.181 (0.930–1.500) 1.364 0.173 0.23 0.820
 Laryngeal cancer 11 22.44 0.013 Random-effects model 1.362 (1.102–1.685) 2.854 0.004 0.78 0.436
 Pharyngeal cancer 7 6.82 0.338 Fixed-effects model 1.519 (1.253–1.843) 4.250 0.000 0.30 0.764
Ethnicity
 Asians 16 59.89 0.000 Random-effects model 1.371 (1.111–1.693) 2.941 0.003 0.14 0.893
 Caucasians 11 14.98 0.135 Fixed-effects model 1.138 (0.941–1.376) 1.329 0.184 0.00 1.000
Source of controls
 Population based 5 14.08 0.007 Random-effects model 1.013 (0.606–1.694) 0.051 0.960 0.73 0.462
 Hospital based 28 80.64 0.000 Random-effects model 1.329 (1.138–1.551) 3.603 0.000 1.05 0.295
Open in a new tab

Abbreviation: OR, odds ratio.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The cumulative meta-analysis of the association between the CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism and the risk of head and neck cancer (Ile/Val+Val/Val vs Ile/Ile).

In the subgroup analyses of tumor types, we observed an increased risk of laryngeal cancer and pharyngeal cancer in patients with the Ile/Val+Val/Val genotype compared to those with the Ile/Ile genotype. The pooled ORs for laryngeal cancer and pharyngeal cancer were 1.362 (95% CI: 1.102–1.685) and 1.519 (95% CI: 1.253–1.843), respectively (Table 2). No significant association between the CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism and the risk of oral cancer was observed. The pooled OR associated with the risk of oral cancer was 1.181 (95% CI: 0.930–1.500; Table 2).

In the subgroup analyses of patients stratified by ethnicity, we observed an increased risk of HNC in Asians with the Ile/Val+Val/Val genotype compared to those with the Ile/Ile genotype, with a pooled OR of 1.371 (95% CI: 1.111–1.693; Table 2). No significant association between the CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism and the risk of HNC in Caucasians was observed. The pooled OR in this subgroup was 1.138 (95% CI: 0.941–1.376; Table 2).

In the subgroup analysis in which the data were stratified according to the source of controls used in the study, we observed an increased risk of HNC associated with the Ile/Val+Val/Val genotype compared to those with the Ile/Ile genotype in patients from studies that used hospital-based controls (OR =1.329, 95% CI: 1.138–1.551), but no significant association was observed in patients from studies that used population-based controls (OR =1.013, 95% CI: 0.606–1.694; Table 2).

Bias diagnosis

The publication bias was evaluated using a funnel plot analysis. The shape of the funnel plot appeared roughly symmetrical (Figure 2), and the results of Begg’s test suggested that publication bias would not significantly affect the summary estimates.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Funnel plot of the publication bias detected using Begg’s test (Ile/Val+Val/Val vs Ile/Ile).

Notes: The x-axis represents the standard error of the log of the odds ratio, and the y-axis represents the log of the odds ratio.

Abbreviations: SE, standard error; OR, odds ratio.

Sensitivity analysis

To determine the impact of the individual data sets on the pooled OR, we conducted a sensitivity analysis in which each eligible study was consecutively omitted from the pooled data. The pooled OR was not significantly affected by the sequential deletion of individual studies, indicating that the results of this study are reliable and robust (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Sensitivity analysis of the association between the CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism and the risk of head and neck cancer (Ile/Val+Val/Val vs Ile/Ile).

Discussion

Although two previously published meta-analyses evaluated the association between the CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism and the risk of HNC,49,50 careful examination of these data reveals several key issues worth noting. First, Qin et al mistakenly included a study published by Cascorbi et al51 that evaluated the association between the −463G/A variant of the myeloperoxidase gene and the risk of cancer of the aerodigestive tract in their meta-analysis (supplemental Table 1 and supplemental references in the study of Qin et al50). Similarly, Qin et al also mistakenly included a study published by Bufalo et al52 that evaluated the association between the CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism and the susceptibility of thyroid cancer in their meta-analysis (supplemental Table 1 and supplemental references in Qin et al50). Furthermore, Qin et al50 included one article with overlapping data.53

In the second meta-analysis, Liu et al49 reported data from a study by Katoh et al14 that were inconsistent with the data reported by Katoh et al14 in their original publication. Katoh et al reported that they evaluated 92 cases and 147 controls (Table 3 in Katoh et al14); however, Liu et al reported that 147 cases and 92 controls had been evaluated in that study (Table 1 in Liu et al49). Similarly, Liu et al reported that Reszka et al’s study evaluated 151 controls (Table 1 in Liu et al49), whereas Reszka et al reported that they evaluated 145 controls (Table 2 in Reszka et al32). Furthermore, Liu et al49 reported that the study by McWilliams et al16 evaluated 160 cases and 149 controls (Table 1 in Liu et al49). However, McWilliams et al reported that they evaluated 139 cases and 121 controls (Table 4 in McWilliams et al16). In addition, three eligible articles12,13,27 were not included in the study by Liu et al.49 Finally, although Sato et al reported that the CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism was associated with an increased risk of oral cancer,18 these data were not included in the oral cancer subgroup analysis in the Liu et al’s study (Figure 2A in Liu et al49).

Together, these observations indicate that current data describing the association between the CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism and the risk of HNC are not entirely reliable. Three recent studies41,43,44 on this topic have been subsequently published; however, further verification of the association between the CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism and the risk of HNC is still required. The cumulative meta-analysis reported here was conducted to verify the association of the CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism with the risk of HNC using data from a total of 34 studies that evaluated 6,367 cases and 6,395 controls. The goal of this study was to provide comprehensive and conclusive evidence regarding the association of the CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism with the risk of HNC. Overall, we observed an increased risk of HNC in patients with the Ile/Val+Val/Val genotype compared to those with the Ile/Ile genotype. We also observed an increased risk of HNC in patients with the Ile/Val+Val/Val genotype compared to those with the Ile/Ile genotype in various subgroups (laryngeal cancer, pharyngeal cancer, Asians, and patients in studies that used hospital-based controls).

The potential limitations of this meta-analysis should also be acknowledged. First, only published articles were selected in this study; therefore, publication bias might have influenced the results. To address this issue, we evaluated the eligible studies using Begg’s test and determined that the likelihood of publication bias was negligible. Second, although some confounding variables were well balanced between studies, different studies might have used different inclusion criteria and different sources of controls. These factors should be taken into account when interpreting the pooled data. To address this issue, we conducted subgroup analyses of patients in studies that used hospital-based controls and those that used population-based controls. Third, this cumulative meta-analysis is based on an unadjusted estimate; therefore, a more precise analysis accounting for adjusted factors should be carried out in the future.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that the CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism is associated with an increased risk of HNC, particularly in laryngeal cancer and pharyngeal cancer. The verification of our findings requires additional well-designed studies evaluating large sample sizes.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no U1404815) and the Henan Collaborative Innovation Center of Molecular Diagnosis and Laboratory Medicine (XTCX-2015-PY7). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the article.

Footnotes

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • 1.Argiris A, Karamouzis MV, Raben D, Ferris RL. Head and neck cancer. Lancet. 2008;371(9625):1695–1709. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60728-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hashibe M, Brennan P, Benhamou S, et al. Alcohol drinking in never users of tobacco, cigarette smoking in never drinkers, and the risk of head and neck cancer: pooled analysis in the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(10):777–789. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djk179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Network TCGA. Comprehensive genomic characterization of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Nature. 2015;517(7536):576–582. doi: 10.1038/nature14129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hayashi SI, Watanabe J, Nakachi K, Kawajiri K. PCR detection of an A/G polymorphism within exon 7 of the CYP1A1 gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19(17):4797. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.17.4797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Landi MT, Bertazzi PA, Shields PG, et al. Association between CYP1A1 genotype, mRNA expression and enzymatic activity in humans. Pharmacogenetics. 1994;4(5):242–246. doi: 10.1097/00008571-199410000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Han G, Ma Y, Liu P, Wei X, Zhang X, Zhu F. Quantitative synthesis of the association between the cytochrome P450 1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism and prostate cancer risk. Tumour Biol. 2013;34(3):1511–1516. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-0676-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gong FF, Lu SS, Hu CY, et al. Cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) polymorphism and susceptibility to esophageal cancer: an updated meta-analysis of 27 studies. Tumour Biol. 2014;35(10):10351–10361. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2341-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wei XP, Hu J. Cytochrome P450 1A1 exon 7 polymorphism and susceptibility to lung cancer in the Chinese population: an updated meta-analysis and review. Onco Targets Ther. 2015;8:1611–1618. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S84575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yang S, Jia C, Zhu H, Han S. CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism and cervical cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol. 2012;33(6):2265–2272. doi: 10.1007/s13277-012-0488-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lu J, Zhao Q, Zhai YJ, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of CYP1A1 and risk of leukemia: a meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther. 2015;8:2883–2902. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S92259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Park JY, Muscat JE, Ren Q, et al. CYP1A1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms and oral cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997;6(10):791–797. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Matthias C, Bockmuhl U, Jahnke V, et al. Polymorphism in cytochrome P450 CYP2D6, CYP1A1, CYP2E1 and glutathione S-transferase, GSTM1, GSTM3, GSTT1 and susceptibility to tobacco-related cancers: studies in upper aerodigestive tract cancers. Pharmacogenetics. 1998;8(2):91–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Oude Ophuis MB, van Lieshout EM, Roelofs HM, Peters WH, Manni JJ. Glutathione S-transferase M1 and T1 and cytochrome P4501A1 polymorphisms in relation to the risk for benign and malignant head and neck lesions. Cancer. 1998;82(5):936–943. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Katoh T, Kaneko S, Kohshi K, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of tobacco-and alcohol-related metabolizing enzymes and oral cavity cancer. Int J Cancer. 1999;83(5):606–609. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19991126)83:5<606::aid-ijc6>3.0.co;2-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Morita S, Yano M, Tsujinaka T, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of drug-metabolizing enzymes and susceptibility to head-and-neck squamous-cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 1999;80(5):685–688. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19990301)80:5<685::aid-ijc9>3.0.co;2-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McWilliams JE, Evans AJ, Beer TM, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in head and neck cancer risk. Head Neck. 2000;22(6):609–617. doi: 10.1002/1097-0347(200009)22:6<609::aid-hed10>3.0.co;2-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Olshan AF, Weissler MC, Watson MA, Bell DA. GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1, CYP1A1, and NAT1 polymorphisms, tobacco use, and the risk of head and neck cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000;9(2):185–191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sato M, Sato T, Izumo T, Amagasa T. Genetically high susceptibility to oral squamous cell carcinoma in terms of combined genotyping of CYP1A1 and GSTM1 genes. Oral Oncol. 2000;36(3):267–271. doi: 10.1016/s1368-8375(99)00090-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ko Y, Abel J, Harth V, et al. Association of CYP1B1 codon 432 mutant allele in head and neck squamous cell cancer is reflected by somatic mutations of p53 in tumor tissue. Cancer Res. 2001;61(11):4398–4404. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sreelekha TT, Ramadas K, Pandey M, Thomas G, Nalinakumari KR, Pillai MR. Genetic polymorphism of CYP1A1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes in Indian oral cancer. Oral Oncol. 2001;37(7):593–598. doi: 10.1016/s1368-8375(01)00028-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hahn M, Hagedorn G, Kuhlisch E, Schackert HK, Eckelt U. Genetic polymorphisms of drug-metabolizing enzymes and susceptibility to oral cavity cancer. Oral Oncol. 2002;38(5):486–490. doi: 10.1016/s1368-8375(01)00086-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kao SY, Wu CH, Lin SC, et al. Genetic polymorphism of cytochrome P4501A1 and susceptibility to oral squamous cell carcinoma and oral precancer lesions associated with smoking/betel use. J Oral Pathol Med. 2002;31(9):505–511. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0714.2002.00158.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gronau S, Koenig-Greger D, Jerg M, Riechelmann H. Gene polymorphisms in detoxification enzymes as susceptibility factor for head and neck cancer? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;128(5):674–680. doi: 10.1016/S0194-59980300176-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Varzim G, Monteiro E, Silva RA, Fernandes J, Lopes C. CYP1A1 and XRCC1 gene polymorphisms in SCC of the larynx. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2003;12(6):495–499. doi: 10.1097/00008469-200312000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Evans AJ, Henner WD, Eilers KM, et al. Polymorphisms of GSTT1 and related genes in head and neck cancer risk. Head Neck. 2004;26(1):63–70. doi: 10.1002/hed.10342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Li L, Lin P, Deng YF, Zhu ZL, Lu HH. Relationship between susceptibility and prognosis of laryngeal cancer and genetic polymorphisms in CYP1A1 and GSTM1. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 2004;39(1):2–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Xie H, Hou L, Shields PG, et al. Metabolic polymorphisms, smoking, and oral cancer in Puerto Rico. Oncol Res. 2004;14(6):315–320. doi: 10.3727/096504003773994851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gajecka M, Rydzanicz M, Jaskula-Sztul R, Kujawski M, Szyfter W, Szyfter K. CYP1A1, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, NAT2, GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms or their combinations are associated with the increased risk of the laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Mutat Res. 2005;574(1–2):112–123. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.01.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Leichsenring A, Losi-Guembarovski R, Maciel ME, et al. CYP1A1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms in an oral cancer case-control study. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2006;39(12):1569–1574. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2006001200007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Marques CF, Koifman S, Koifman RJ, Boffetta P, Brennan P, Hatagima A. Influence of CYP1A1, CYP2E1, GSTM3 and NAT2 genetic polymorphisms in oral cancer susceptibility: results from a case-control study in Rio de Janeiro. Oral Oncol. 2006;42(6):632–637. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sugimura T, Kumimoto H, Tohnai I, et al. Gene-environment interaction involved in oral carcinogenesis: molecular epidemiological study for metabolic and DNA repair gene polymorphisms. J Oral Pathol Med. 2006;35(1):11–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2005.00364.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Reszka E, Czekaj P, Adamska J, Wasowicz W. Relevance of glutathione S-transferase M1 and cytochrome P450 1A1 genetic polymorphisms to the development of head and neck cancers. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008;46(8):1090–1096. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2008.227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sam SS, Thomas V, Reddy SK, Surianarayanan G, Chandrasekaran A. CYP1A1 polymorphisms and the risk of upper aerodigestive tract cancers in an Indian population. Head Neck. 2008;30(12):1566–1574. doi: 10.1002/hed.20897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Varela-Lema L, Ruano-Ravina A, Juiz Crespo MA, Kelsey KT, Loidi L, Barros-Dios JM. CYP1A1, mEH, and GSTM1 polymophisms and risk of oral and pharyngeal cancer: a Spanish Case-Control Study. J Oncol. 2008;2008:741310. doi: 10.1155/2008/741310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Amtha R, Ching CS, Zain R, et al. GSTM1, GSTT1 and CYP1A1 polymorphisms and risk of oral cancer: a case-control study in Jakarta, Indonesia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2009;10(1):21–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Singh AP, Shah PP, Ruwali M, Mathur N, Pant MC, Parmar D. Polymorphism in cytochrome P4501A1 is significantly associated with head and neck cancer risk. Cancer Invest. 2009;27(8):869–876. doi: 10.1080/07357900902849657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sabitha K, Reddy MV, Jamil K. Smoking related risk involved in individuals carrying genetic variants of CYP1A1 gene in head and neck cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. 2010;34(5):587–592. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2010.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sharma R, Ahuja M, Panda NK, Khullar M. Combined effect of smoking and polymorphisms in tobacco carcinogen-metabolizing enzymes CYP1A1 and GSTM1 on the head and neck cancer risk in North Indians. DNA Cell Biol. 2010;29(8):441–448. doi: 10.1089/dna.2009.1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tai J, Yang M, Ni X, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 genes are associated with an increased risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx in a Chinese population. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2010;196(1):76–82. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2009.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lourenco GJ, Silva EF, Rinck-Junior JA, Chone CT, Lima CS. CYP1A1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms, tobacco and alcohol status and risk of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2011;32(6):1209–1215. doi: 10.1007/s13277-011-0224-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Balaji L, Singh KB, Bhaskar LV. CYP1A1 genotypes and haplotypes and risk of oral cancer: a case-control study in South Indians. Genet Mol Biol. 2012;35(2):407–412. doi: 10.1590/S1415-47572012005000024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Szanyi I, Rath G, Moricz P, et al. Effects of cytochrome P450 1A1 and uridine-diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 allelic polymorphisms on the risk of development and the prognosis of head and neck cancers. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2012;21(6):560–568. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e328350b04c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Singh RD, Haridas N, Shah FD, Patel JB, Shukla SN, Patel PS. Gene polymorphisms, tobacco exposure and oral cancer susceptibility: a study from Gujarat, West India. Oral Dis. 2014;20(1):84–93. doi: 10.1111/odi.12079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Maurya SS, Katiyar T, Dhawan A, et al. Gene-environment interactions in determining differences in genetic susceptibility to cancer in subsites of the head and neck. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2015;56(3):313–321. doi: 10.1002/em.21920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gronau S, Koenig-Greger D, Jerg M, Riechelmann H. GSTM1 enzyme concentration and enzyme activity in correlation to the genotype of detoxification enzymes in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Oral Dis. 2003;9(2):62–67. doi: 10.1034/j.1601-0825.2003.02866.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wang Y, Yang H, Wang H. The association of GSTT1 deletion polymorphism with lung cancer risk among Chinese population: evidence based on a cumulative meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther. 2015;8:2875–2882. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S93745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–188. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50(4):1088–1101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Liu L, Wu G, Xue F, et al. Functional CYP1A1 genetic variants, alone and in combination with smoking, contribute to development of head and neck cancers. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(9):2143–2151. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.01.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Qin J, Zhang JX, Li XP, Wu BQ, Chen GB, He XF. Association between the CYP1A1 A2455G polymorphism and risk of cancer: evidence from 272 case-control studies. Tumour Biol. 2014;35(4):3363–3376. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-1443-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Cascorbi I, Henning S, Brockmoller J, et al. Substantially reduced risk of cancer of the aerodigestive tract in subjects with variant – 463A of the myeloperoxidase gene. Cancer Res. 2000;60(3):644–649. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Bufalo NE, Leite JL, Guilhen AC, et al. Smoking and susceptibility to thyroid cancer: an inverse association with CYP1A1 allelic variants. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2006;13(4):1185–1193. doi: 10.1677/ERC-06-0002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Katoh T. Application of molecular biology to occupational health field – the frequency of gene polymorphism of cytochrome P450 1A1 and glutathione S-transferase M1 in patients with lung, oral and urothelial cancer. J UOEH. 1995;17(4):271–278. doi: 10.7888/juoeh.17.271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from OncoTargets and therapy are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES